Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
William Chow
MAE 221A
Abstract:
This paper investigates how two-phase heat transfer methods can be applied to the
cooling of high-power density electronic devices; specifically focusing on the methods which
involve the use of liquid droplet sprays and jets. Examples of current research work will be
discussed, as well as a detailed description of the importance and history of electronics
cooling. The conclusion of this report finds that, although its still in early stages of
development, two-phase liquid-vapor cooling techniques are a viable solution for future high-
heat flux electronics, offering at least twice the heat dissipation of current mainstream cooling
systems.
Introduction:
and more powerful electronics, increasing the importance of efficient thermal management in
these components. Looking specifically at the computer processor industry, the seemingly
processes has led to products with significant heat dissipation demands. Current computer
processors already possess heat fluxes of 50 W/cm2 to 80 W/cm2, and this number will only
increase as time goes on. Unfortunately, the performance of traditional air-cooling methods is
quickly becoming insufficient to handle these growing high heat flux requirements. Therefore,
new and more active methods of cooling these electronics must be developed.
The use of liquids, as an alternative to air, as the cooling medium appears to be the
most sensible solution to this dilemma. Newer, more efficient cooling systems involving
liquids will no doubt be prevalent in the future. In fact, several advanced thermal management
techniques that far exceed the heat flux requirements of modern electronics already exist.
However, they have yet to be simplified into the scalable and reliable form suitable for
consumer electronics. And with the increased demand for portability in today’s market, the
specifically focusing on those which involve the use of liquid droplet sprays and jets. These
two-phase cooling methods are appealing than single-phase methods since the working fluid
is vaporized in one section and then condensed in another, leading to much higher heat
advantageous because it is one of the few methods that are able to provide direct cooling to
the surface of the microchip, while other liquid cooling methods can only provide indirect
cooling through conductive surfaces. The ultimate goal of this report will be to sum up the
current research progress for this cooling method and provide insight into how practical it will
Importance:
effect of poor temperature control in these devices is twofold; not only does it degrade the
overall performance, but it will also affect the reliability of the component. If an electronic
device is not properly cooled, it will only be able to operate for short periods of time, greatly
detracting from its overall usability and may cause damage, shortening the lifespan of the
component. Because of this, it is essential that the temperature of the device stay within its
operating limits, which is only possible through effective heat diffusion methods.
Figure 2: Apple Computer Inc. CEO Steve Jobs announcing the switch from PowerPC processors to Intel.
Source: Apple Computer Inc.
Another limitation caused by excess heat generation is that it directly limits the
performance potential of the component. A good example of this effect is in the case of
computer processors. As the speed of the processor is increased, the amount of heat the device
generates increases proportionally. Since this heat is typically dissipated by some external
cooling system, the performance of the processor is directly linked to how well this system
operates, so if it has limitations, those limitations will be reflected back onto the performance
of the processor. A good example of this comes from recent history; In the middle of 2005,
Apple Computer Inc. announced that they would stop using IBM’s PowerPC processor in
their computers and switch to Intel’s Core Duo line of processors. The main motivation
behind this switch was the fact that IBM’s processor ran at very high temperatures when
compared to Intel’s chip. Since most modern personal computers are still air-cooled using
fans and heatsinks, the IBM processor ultimately reached its limit; it could no longer increase
its performance without exceeding the heat flux capacity of its air-cooling system.
its ideal operating temperature possesses even more consequences. Not only should the
temperature be within the correct operating range for both performance and reliability, this
ideal temperature should be low enough for safe handling by the consumer. For example, a
common complaint about portable computers is that they tend to dissipate heat poorly,
causing the heat from its internal components to radiate through the outer casing, making the
surfaces hot to the touch. This is an obvious deterrent, for if the temperature were to reach an
unsafe level, the risk of injury would increase. Furthermore, the increasing demand for
portability in modern electronics only further emphasizes the need for more effective methods
of high-heat dissipation.
History:
The traditional method for cooling modern electronics is through air-cooling. The heat
generated by the integrated circuits present in the device needs to be dissipated in order to
keep the component at a safe and reliable operating temperature. The idea behind the use of
air-cooling is that it allows this heat generated to be dispersed into the surroundings through
convection. Early electronic devices were relatively simple and consequently did not possess
high rate of power consumption, which allowed them to be passively cooled using only
increasing heat transfer area was enough to keep it in an ideal operating range.
Figure 3: A modern fan & heatsink computer processor cooler.
Source: Zalman Tech.
amount of heat produced became a side effect of the increased complexity and power
consumption of these devices. To offset this increase in temperature, more active cooling
methods have been created. The addition of larger heatsinks and electric fans has allowed the
use of forced convection to improve heat transfer rates. The use of a fan allows the hot air
around the device to be pushed away, while drawing in cooler air from the surrounding
environment. In fact, this fan and heatsink combination is the most widely used method for
cooling high power density electronics. However, as these integrated circuits become smaller
and more intricate, the heat flux necessary to cool them quickly becomes out of the reach of
Current alternatives to air-cooling include the use of liquids as the cooling medium.
Water-cooling is one method, commonly found in large data processing systems, where water
instead of air flows over a heatsink attached to the electronic component. Because water
possesses a higher heat capacity compared to air, it is able to transmit heat away from the
source at a much higher rate, resulting in more efficient cooling and a lower temperature
difference. Other, more uncommon cooling methods include submersion cooling, where the
components are placed directly into a dielectric fluid, allowing passive cooling between the
device and the working fluid. Again, due to the liquid’s higher heat capacity, this method
Jet impingement cooling has always been an attractive alternative to common cooling
methods, mainly because it is capable of very high heat removal rates. It is currently used in
many industrial applications, including, but not limited to, metal sheet cooling, cooling of
turbine blades and temperature regulation in high powered lasers. Jet impingement, as well as
other two-phase cooling methods allow for higher rates of heat dispersion when compared to
single-phase cooling due to the large amount energy absorbed by the phase change of the
liquid. Adapting this mechanism for use in electronic systems would offer a significant
improvement over traditional air-cooling or even more recent single-phase liquid cooling
techniques.
Two-phase cooling methods involving a liquid-vapor phase change have always been
an appealing option for removing heat from high power density electronics because their heat
transfer coefficients are typically high. Although these techniques have long been used in
many industrial applications, they only have recently become a viable for high-powered
thermal management solutions, and therefore, many studies have been aimed directly at this
type of application.
cooling methods on high heat flux electronics using sprays and microjets. An experiment was
conducted using HAGO nozzles and orifice plates to create droplet sprays and arrays of
microjets. The experimental setup diagram is shown in Figure 4. The jets possessed diameters
ranging from 69 to 250 μm, and used deionized water with jet Reynolds numbers ranging
from 43 and 3813. The experiment concluded that the microjet arrays were superior to the
spray nozzles, since they required less pumping power per unit of power removed, as well as
the fact that the pressure drop needed by the HAGO nozzles quickly reached values that were
of water of 140 μm resulted in heat fluxes as high as 300 W/cm2 for a surface temperature of
80 °C.
Figure 4: Schematic of the cooling experiment done using droplet sprays and arrays of microjets.
Source: Fabbri et al. [1]
Additional research in the area of two phase cooling systems has been done using
microsprays. Amon et al. [2] developed an integrated droplet impingement cooling device
specifically designed for removing heat fluxes from computer chips. The system “of
microspray nozzles designed to produce droplets 50-100 μm in diameter, along with a specific
texturing pattern on the heat transfer surface meant to promote droplet spreading, as seen in
Figure 5. The experiment also investigated the effect of different nozzle orifice shapes, and
their effect in promoting uniform heat transfer from the surface of the component. The final
experiment was conducted on a notebook computer processor using the EDIFICE system with
a “swirl” type nozzle orifice and HFE-7200 dielectric coolant as the working fluid. The results
of the prototype experiment gave a uniform heat flux of 45 W/cm2 over the surface of the
Figure 5: Schematic of the EDIFICE cooling system which makes use of microspray droplets.
Source: Anon et al. [2]
Mathematical Background:
The physical theory behind the heat dissipation process using impinging droplets is
very complex and not yet fully understood, so other examples of research work have focused
more on the mathematics behind these two-phase heat transfer methods. Early research done
by Jiji and Dragan [3] investigated the heat transfer effects of single-phase jets impinging on
microelectrical heat sources. Experiments were conducted using square arrays of 1, 4 and 9
jets, FC77 as the test fluid and square heat sources 12.7 × 12.7 mm in size. From the results of
this experiment, the area-averaged Nusselt number was correlated as function of the Reynolds
⎛ L ⎞
NuL = 3.84 Re1δ n2 Pr1 3 ⎜ 0.08 N + 1⎟
⎝ δn ⎠
Where δ n is the jet diameter, L is the length of the heat source, and N is the number of jets.
Another important conclusion from their research was the notion that the surface temperature
of the heat source became more uniform as the distance between the jets and the surface
decreased.
For arrays of multiple jets, there is a difference in heat transfer at the stagnation points
and the radial flow regions on the surface. Research done by Womac et al. [4] first
investigated two different jet configurations, one with 2 × 2 jets, and another with 3 × 3 jets.
Using both water and FC77 as the cooling fluid, experiments were conduction with Reynolds
numbers for both laminar and turbulent flow, ranging from 500 to 20,000. The rate of heat
transfer increased for cases of increasing jet velocity, but very significant heat transfer losses
were found when the fluid flow rate was decreased in the case of very low flow rates.
However, to account for the differences due to the stagnation points on the heat transfer
surface, an area-weighted method was used, and the resulting correlation for average Nusselt
is the critical heat flux. The critical heat flux is the maximum heat flux on the boiling curve of
the cooling liquid. If the critical heat flux is exceeded, a significant increase in the
temperature of the object will occur. Because of this, the critical heat flux turns out to be the
upper design limit for any cooling systems of this type. Nakayama et al. [5] researched the
boiling of jet impinging flows using FC72 as the working fluid. The conclusions from this
research found that increases in jet velocities or the number of nozzles lead to higher values
for the critical heat flux. Critical heat flux values of up to 200 W/cm2 were obtained using a
system of multiple jets. In comparison, the heat flux needed by future high-power electronics
is estimated to be near100 W/cm2, showing that phase-change cooling systems are capable of
choose to investigate the reliability of such systems. Current cooling systems, such as the fan
and heatsink combination for personal computers, have a lifespan of at least 40,000 hours. So
even if a two-phase jet impingement cooling system was adapted for mainstream use, it would
still need to meet the reliability of current solutions, despite its increase in cooling
performance.
For an experiment, I would propose setting up a system similar to those already used
in current research work. Since the general consensus is that jet impinging systems perform
better than sprays, I would choose to focus on the reliability of that type of system. However,
instead of system with variable specifications, I would choose fixed system parameters, such
as the number of jets, the jet Reynolds number, the heat source area, and so on. These
parameters would be chosen so that the resulting heat flux capacity is something reasonable
(>100 W/cm2), so that the reliability results can be representative of how an actual,
mainstream system would perform. So the final experiment would simply leave the system
running at set operating specifications, to determine if such a system could match the
[1] Fabbri, M., Jiang, S., and Dhir, V. K., 2005, “A Comparative Study of Cooling of High
Power Density Electronics Using Sprays and Microjets,” ASME Journal of Heat Transfer,
127, pp. 38-48.
[2] Amon, C. H., Yao, S. C., Wu, C. F., Hsieh, C. C., 2005, “Microelectromechanical System-
Based Evaporative Thermal Management of High Heat Flux Electronics,” ASME Journal of
Heat Transfer, 127, pp. 66-75.
[3] Jiji, L. J., and Dagan, Z., 1987, ‘‘Experimental Investigation of Single-Phase Multijet
Impingement Cooling of an Array of Microelectronic Heat Sources,’’ Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Cooling Technology for Electronic Equipment, W. Aung, ed.,
Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D.C., pp. 333–351.
[4] Womac, D. J., Ramadhyani, S., and Incropera, F. P., 1993, ‘‘Correlating Equations for
Impingement Cooling of Small Heat Sources With Single Circular Liquid Jets,’’ ASME
Journal of Heat Transfer, 115, pp. 106–115.
[5] Nakayama, W., and Copeland, D., 1994, ‘‘Heat Transfer from Chips to Dielectric Coolant:
Enhanced Pool Boiling Versus Jet Impingement Cooling,’’ J. Enhanced Heat Transfer, 1(3),
pp. 231–243.