Dasmarinas 1

Annotated Bibliography
Primary Sources

CBS News, RealAgentofSHIELD. "YouTube - Roe V. Wade." YouTube - Broadcast

Yourself. Youtube, 17 June 2008. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=6n10mp2qguQ&feature=player_embedded>.
This primary source is an actual news footage by CBS on January 22, 1973. It is useful
because it summarizes the court decision in a different way, through multimedia. I used it
as a video clip for my website.

Cgk. "Roe v Wade: FULL Text (The Decision That Wiped out an Entire Generation 33 Years
Ago Today)." Roe v. Wade Full Text Decision. 22 Jan. 2006. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562778/posts>.
This primary source is the full text decision of the Supreme Court regarding Roe v.
Wade. This is useful for thorough review of the arguments presented and the decision
itself. I used it as a primary source link for my website.

Creative Commons, By. "Abortion in the United States." Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia. Web. 12 Dec. 2010.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States>.
This primary source is a graph showing American opinion prior to Roe v. Wade. This is a
very useful source that clearly demonstrates the change of opinion after Roe v. Wade if
compared to the graphs showing opinion after Roe v. Wade. I used this for mere
comparison between previous and current opinions.

DemocraticMediaMKII. "YouTube - Roe V Wade @ Hofstra Presidential Debate." YouTube -

Broadcast Yourself. 15 Oct. 2008. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=SVI7eYbWtak>.
This primary source is a video footage of McCain and Obama's debate on abortion in
Hofstra University. It was useful as evidence to the ongoing debate. I used it as a video
link for my website.

"Employment Situation Summary." U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Nov. 2010. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm>.
This primary source is a employment situation summary from the US Bureau of Labor
Statistics. It is useful to show how the current unemployment rate of the nation. I used to
show the Pro Life argument that the costs of abortion will not be of benefit to women
who are unemployed or simply cannot afford it.

Garrow, David J. Liberty and Sexuality: the Right to Privacy and the Making of
Roe v. Wade. New York: Macmillan Pub., 1994. Print.
This primary source is a book by David J. Garrow. It is useful because it gave the
information on how the case progressed in the Supreme Court. I used it on my historical
analysis of Roe v. Wade.
 Dasmarinas 2

Gallup. "Abortion Graphs and Charts." Clinic Quotes. Clinic Quotes. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://clinicquotes.com/site/story.php?id=174>.
These graphs are primary source graphs that show opinion on Pro Choice and Pro Life,
and abortion as either morally wrong or not. These are useful because it shows actual
opinion. I used these as a graphic representations to present my arguments on how Roe v.
Wade sparked off a national debate.

McCorvey, Norma, and Andy Meisler. I Am Roe: My Life, Roe v. Wade, and Freedom
of Choice. New York: HarperCollinsPublishers, 1994. Print.
This primary source is a book by Norma McCorvey "Jane Roe" herself, with the help of
Andy Meisler. This is useful for learning about the history of Roe v. Wade, at least based
on her perspective. I used it for my analysis on the case itself on "Background" section of
my project.

"Read The Bill: H.R. 227 - GovTrack.us." GovTrack.us: Tracking the U.S.
Congress.Paul Broun.GovTrack. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-227>.
This primary source is a bill in the House of Representatives. It is useful to me because
its main goal is to make "life at conception" a law. I used this a Pro Life argument.

Roe v. Wade. Supreme Court. 22 Jan. 1973. Google Scholars. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?
case=12334123945835207673&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr>.
This is a primary source document containing actual Supreme Court texts regarding Roe
v. Wade. It is useful for thorough review of the arguments and basis of the decision. I
used it as a primary source link in my website.

Roe v. Wade. United States District Court of Texas. 17 June 2003. United States District
Court of Northern Texas. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/judges/notable2.html#mccorvey>.
These are primary source documents that contain actions made by the United States
District Court of Northern Texas regarding Roe v. Wade. These are useful documents
because they contain actual court texts. I used these as links to five documents in my
website.

"Shutup About Your “Issues” « Rube Reality." Rube Reality. Wordpress, 2009. Web. Dec.
2010. <http://rubereality.com/2009/10/14/shutup-about-your-issues/>.
This primary source is an image of the actual NY Times headline. It is useful to me
because it gives the actual headline text on January 22, 1973, the day of the decision. I
used in my project as an image for "Background" section of my project.

Supreme Court of the United States. Web. Dec. 2010.

<http://www.supremecourt.gov/>.
 Dasmarinas 3

This is the Supreme Court of the United States official website. I used it as a direct to the
Supreme Court.

Wright, Wendy. "Planned Parenthood - Answers in Genesis." Answers in Genesis -

Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics. 1 Jan. 2007. Web. 12 Dec. 2010.
<http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n1/planned-parenthood>.
This primary source is an image of protesters in front of the Minnesota Capitol Building
used by an article author. This image is useful to get a glimpse into the world of the
actual protests going on preceding the Roe v. Wade decision. I used it in my project to
show an example of a protest going on.

Secondary Sources

"About.com:" Women's History - Comprehensive Women's History Research

Guide. Web. 12 Dec. 2010. <http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/o.htm?
zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=womenshistory&cdn=education&tm=234&f=10&su=p897.10.336.ip_&tt
=11&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http://www.galegroup.com/free%5Fresources/whm/trials/roe.htm>.
This secondary source is a brief summary of Roe v. Wade. It is useful to me because it
saved me time from reading the actual Court documents and actually understanding them.
I used it in my paper to give a background information on Roe v. Wade case.

"Adoption vs. Abortion vs. Parenting." American Adoptions - A Full Service Adoption
Agency. American Adoptions. Web. 12 Dec. 2010.
<http://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/adoption_abortion_parenting>.
This secondary source is a comparison between the effects on abortion and adoption. This
source is useful my to Pro Life argument analysis because it shows the benefits the
mother would have if she considered adoption rather than abortion. I used it for my Pro
Life argument.

Alcorn, Randy. "PROLIFE: 10 Arguments Against Abortion." Christian Action. Christian

Action, 2003. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.christianaction.org.za/articles/10rguments.htm>.
This secondary source is an estimation of abortion costs. It is useful to me because it gave
me information to include in my Pro Life analysis. I used it as a Pro Life argument in my
website.

"April 2009." *Rachael's Diary*. Blogspot, 20 Apr. 2009. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://heiressroyalty.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html>.
This source is a poster of Pro Life. It is useful to present a Pro Life argument as a graphic
representation. I used this for Pro Life analysis.

"Convention on the Rights of Child." UNICEF - Convention on the Rights of a Child.

UNICEF, 26 Aug. 2008. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.unicef.org/crc/>.
This secondary source is an article about UNICEF's child rights convention. It is useful to
me because it gave me the information that the right to life was the right of a child. I used
it in my Pro Life argument.
 Dasmarinas 4

Gabe. The Science of Abortion. Wordpress, 18 Nov. 2009. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://logicalscience.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/the-science-of-abortion/>.
This source is an actual Pro Choice poster. It is useful to show Pro Choice argument as a
graphic. I used this source as an image for Pro Choice.

Glenn, Alexis. Pro-choice and Pro-life Protesters Mark Roe v. Wade Anniversary
in Washington. Web. Dec. 2010. <https://rcclibrary.wikispaces.com/Abortion>.
This source is an image of current protesters for Pro Choice. It is useful
to present current debate over abortion. I used this as my main website picture.

Lowen, Linda. "McCain and Obama Discuss Abortion at Third Presidential Debate of 2008."
Women's Issues - All About Women's Issues. About.com, 2008. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://womensissues.about.com/od/womensissuesin2008race/qt/3rdDebat08Abort.htm>.
This secondary source is the third presidential debate between Obama and McCain
regarding abortion. It is useful for showing that there is still debate going on about
abortion. I used this as ongoing debate evidence.

Lowen, Linda. "McCain and Obama Discuss Abortion at Third Presidential Debate of 2008."
Women's Issues - All About Women's Issues. About.com, 2008. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://womensissues.about.com/od/womensissuesin2008race/qt/3rdDebat08Abort.htm>.
This source is an image of Obama and McCain’s debate over abortion. This was useful to
my project because it shows evidence of the debate. I used this as an image for “Ongoing
Debate” section of my website.

Lieberman, Brett. "Abortion March Draws Many from Pennsylvania." 23 Jan. 2008. Web. Dec.
2010. <http://blog.pennlive.com/pennsyltucky/2008/01/AP080122026539.jpg>.
This source is an image of Pro Life protesters. I found this useful as evidence to ongoing
abortion debate for Pro Life. I used this source as a main image for my website.

"NARAL." NARAL Pro-Choice America. Web. 12 Dec. 2010. <http://www.naral.org/>.

This primary source is the official website of NARAL, a Pro Choice organization of
today. This was useful to me for information on their arguments and goals. I used this for
the "Today" section of my website.

National Right to Life. NRLC. Web. Dec. 2010. <http://www.nrlc.org/>.

This primary source is the official website of NRLC, a Pro Life Organization. It was
useful for information on their arguments and goals. I used this source on the “Today"
section of my website.

Pendergraft IV, M.D, James S. "Is A Fetus A Person? The Reason for Legal Abortion."
Women's Center. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://www.womenscenter.com/pdfs/Is_A_Fetus_A_Person.pdf>.
This secondary source is an article about a fetus not being a person. It is useful to my
research because it gave me the information on how Pro Choice considers a fetus not a
 Dasmarinas 5

legal person because it is not under the Constitution. I used this for my Pro Choice
analysis.

Pomeroy, Claire. "Abortion and Women's Rights: Unification of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice
through Feminism." Serendip. Serendip, 15 Jan. 2008. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1845>.
This secondary source is an article about Pro Choice Feminism. It is useful because it
discusses forcing a woman to have the child is against her right to choose, which is as
integral as her right to freedom. I used it as a Pro Choice argument in my website.

Reardon Ph.D, David C. "Abortion Risks: A List of Major Physical Complications Related to
Abortion." Afterabortion.org. Afterabortion.org, 2000. Web. 12 Dec. 2010.
<http://www.afterabortion.org/physica.html>.
This secondary source is an article about health risks that could be possibly developed
after abortion. It is useful to my research because it shows an evidence to Pro Life
argument that a woman who practices abortion would develop help risks. I used it in my
Pro Life argument.

Shoot, Brittany. "More Than Forty Percent of Women Seeking Abortions Are Poor." Poverty
in America | Change.org. Change.org, 4 May 2010. Web. Dec. 2010.
<http://uspoverty.change.org/blog/view/more_than_forty_percent_of_women_seeking_abortions
_are_poor>.
This secondary source is an article that talks about how a big percentage of women who
undergo abortions are poor. It is useful to presenting Pro Choice argument that women do
not have the money to support the unborn child. I used it as a Pro Choice argument in my
Pro Choice analysis.