Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CENTURY
Neşe Yeşilkaya
Gazi University, Turkey
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we argue that one would not grasp the meanings of
transformation of İstanbul entirely without understanding the foundation
that Sultan Mahmud II constructed. Sultan Mahmud II transformed the city not
only with the buildings that he constructed but also by the areas that he
demolished. From this perspective we will discuss the critical role of
Sultan Mahmud II in the transformation history of İstanbul, during the
abolishment of Janissary Corps, by looking through the demolished
areas, such as Eski Odalar, Yeni Odalar and Ağa Kapısı.
KEY WORDS: İstanbul, Sultan Mahmud II, Janissaries, Eski Odalar, Yeni
Odalar, Ağa Kapısı
From the late eighteenth century through the beginning of the nineteenth century
the Ottoman Empire strengthened it’s rule and domination over the traditional
Janissary Corps. Particularly Sultan Mahmud II’s fight against the Janissary Corps
(Vak’a-i Hayriyye in 1826) left its imprints on the urban space at the beginning of
the nineteenth century. Osman Nuri Ergin’s (1995) and İlhan Tekeli’s (1994)
contributions set aside, the role of the abolishment of the Janissary
Corps in the transformation of urban space was not studied in
architectural or urban history of İstanbul.
Osman Nuri Ergin, in his book, Mecelle-i Umur-ı Belediye, emphasises the
significance of the year of the abolishment of the janissaries, i.e. 1826 [1241],
when the establishment of a new order in the place of the traditional system was
possible (1995: 931-936; 1263). Tekeli (1994:5) also points out the “former
changes” before the organisation of the modern administrative system.
Zeynep Çelik, in her book The Remaking of İstanbul, starts with the statement
that “The modern era had not yet left its mark on the Ottoman Capital in the early
decades of the nineteenth century” (1993: 3). She particularly draws attention to
the Tanzimat reforms (1839) and regulations on urban planning and building
codes (after 1848). She also elaborates the roles of big fires, which had
devastated huge areas in the city in 1850s and 1860s. She values the
1856 Aksaray Fire as “a major turning point in the history of İstanbul’s
urban form” (1993: 53). The project of Luigi Storari for the reorganization of
Aksaray, in which the crossroads were “emphasised” by “cutting of the corners”,
was regarded as “Though by no means a public square in the Western sense of
the word, the new intersection was perceived as such, and, for example, was
described by the Journal de Constantinople as a ‘belle place’.” (1993: 54).
For Doğan Kuban, Mahmud II was “the last sultan to rule in a pre-
industrial age” and Tanzimat is “the age of radical administrative
reforms” (1996: 376). Although Kuban claims that during the reign of Sultan
Mahmud II “the city’s physiognomy had been considerably altered” (1996: 376),
his particular emphasis is on the later regulations and building activities.
Sultan Mahmud II, who achieved to overcome Janissary power, realised a serial of
spatial strategies in the urban spaces of Istanbul. Having a control over the space
of the Capital Istanbul was necessary for the continuity of Ottoman Empire, which
was almost loosing the privilege of the Ottoman dynasty against its armed forces
i.e. Janissaries. By the abolishment of the Janissary Corps in 1826, Sultan
Mahmud II not only strengthened his authority in his empire but also eradicated
the signs of Janissaries from the landscape of the Capital. Sustaining his authority
over the empire and the city, Sultan Mahmud II created the basis for
modernisation efforts that took place thereafter. Economical and other
developments of Istanbul constructed on this new “secure” ground.
Here, we argue that the abolishment of Janissary Corps should be taken into
account as a factor of transformation. Spatial strategies of Sultan Mahmud II can
be seen in his attempts to control the urban space. By destroying traditional places
of janissaries, Sultan Mahmud II was not only eliminating the armed forces from
the Historical Peninsula but also removing the symbols and memories of the
janissaries from the inner city.
At the end of this power struggle Sultan Mahmud II destroyed the janissaries in
their barracks. What would have happened, if the janissaries had won the
struggle? Would they have destroyed Topkapı Palace besides Bâb-ı Âli,
which was destroyed not only in the Event of Alemdar and but also in
Vak’a-i Hayriyye? Would they have erased Topkapı and Bâb-ı Âli from
the map and remove the traces of the dynasty and empire from the
urban space? These are hypothetical and speculative questions and no
need to go further, but we have to grasp the problem from such a
strong power struggle that re-shaped the urban space of İstanbul.
Vak’a-i Hayriyye was a momentous event both for the history of the
Ottoman Empire and had important impact in transformation of İstanbul.
Sultan Mahmud II not only exterminated the Janissaries entirely but also
he removed their symbolic presence from the city. Mahmud II ordered
even the destruction of the tombstones of Janissaries in graveyards. Et
Meydanı (where the Janissaries came together in rebellions) Yeni Odalar
(New Barracks) and Eski Odalar (Old Barracks) were eradicated from the
map. Ağa Kapısı, the Headquarter of Janissaries, was damaged (and
later a new office was settled there). Now we will focus on these areas
to understand the effects of Vak’a-i Hayriyye on the transformation of
city of İstanbul in the early nineteenth century.
The main barracks of janissaries were Eski Odalar and Yeni Odalar in the city.
Besides them, there were other sections for the janissaries such as Cebeci
Barracks and the barracks inside the Topkapı. As Goodwin (1997: 72)
describes, janissary barracks were “monumental” and they could
accommodate 40.000 men in the 18th century.
An extremely large complex, Yeni Odalar was erected in the 16 th century. 173
odas were located here, from totally 199 oda belonging to different ortas
(janissary company), (Sakaoğlu, 1994: 467b). Unfortunately, we do have
neither any visual material nor any information about the architectural
features of the barracks. The important point here is, although it was a
huge complex, it is difficult to find the traces of Yeni Odalar today.
Eski Odalar had been built in the reign of Fatih Sultan Mehmed. The area
that we called today Şehzadebaşı was then called “Eskiodalarbaşı”
(Ünver, 1995:128) pointing to its association with janissaries. Subsequent to the
removal of barracks, the area was re-named.
The only plan showing the janissary barracks, that we have, is Water Distribution
Map of Sipahi Seyyid Hasan (Figure 1). Twenty-six orta (janissary company) were
accommodated in the Eski Odalar and they were probably arranged in a “series of
cells” (Goodwin, 1997:72).
Figure 1. Eski Odalar in the Map of Sipahi Seyyid Hasan (1813), (Published in
Çeçen, 1997).
Note: The map is turned upside down for our orientation according to the North.
On the Sipahi Seyyid Hasan’s map we can see that Janissary barracks were
organised around two courtyards. The two groups of barracks were separated with
a straight axis from the south to the north. Osman Nuri Ergin stated that, Fatih
used to have a break in front of this gate, when he arrived the city from the Edirne
Gate (Edirne Kapısı). When he did not stop here, it meant that he was not
satisfied with the efforts of Janissaries (quoted in Ünver, 1995:133).
Therefore, it was a ceremonial place both for people and the janissaries.
On the day of Vak’a-i Hayriyye Yeni Odalar and Et Meydanı were demolished
first. Eski Odalar was deliberately destroyed a few days later (Lûtfî
Efendi: 118). Today the Bath of Acemoğlu is the only construction that
remains from Eski Odalar. Because of its close location to the city
center, firstly, the Eski Odalar complex was re-built as a residential
neighbourhood; Fevziye (Lûtfî Efendi: 118). After then, the complex of Yeni Odalar
was occupied and replaced by the Ahmediye neighbourhood. The monumental
janissary barracks were lost under the residential areas. Hence, today it is not
possible to find the traces of these large barracks in the city. Mahmud II’s policy
was to erase the memories of the old order and its traces from the city space
entirely.
The residence of the head of the Janissary’s was named as Ağa Kapısı or
Tekeli Köşkü (Goodwin, 1997: 70). Ağa Kapısı was located on the North
of the Süleymaniye Mosque. We can see the courtyard of the Ağa Kapısı
from Sipahi Seyyid Hasan’s Map (Figure 2). We can also see the fire
tower of the Ağa Kapısı from Barker’s (1813) Istanbul panorama (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Ağa Kapısı in the Map of Sipahi Seyyid Hasan (1813), (Published
in Çeçen, 1997).
Figure 3. Ağa Kapısı in the Panorama of Barker (1813), (Published in Eldem, 1979)
Ağa Kapısı was one of the ceremonial places of Istanbul. For instance,
the birth of a new member to the Ottoman’s Imperial family was
celebrated in front of the Ağa Kapısı (Cevdet Paşa :2607) besides the other
places such as Bâb-ı Âli. Ağa Kapısı and its tower were damaged during the Vak’a-i
Hayriyye. In 1827, Mahmud II laid the foundation of the Sublime Porte
Building again. During the construction, Sublime Porte was moved to the
Ağa Kapısı, which was not used by janissaries anymore.
Actually, after the Vak’a-i Hayriyye, Ağa Kapısı was used as the Headquarter of
the new army for a very short time (Lûtfî Efendi: 118). Later Bâb-ı Fetva
was established here. By replacing Ağa Kapısı with Bâb-ı Fetva, Mahmud
II not only honoured the Şeyhülislam but also he relegated the Ağa
Kapısı laden with sad memories into history. In his Hatt-ı Hümayun
(imperial order), Sultan Mahmud II clearly emphasized that he aimed to
“extract even the phrase Ağa Kapısı from public language” (quoted from
Hatt-ı Hümayun in Lûtfî Efendi: 118). He stated that, by a strong belief to şeri’at, it
was aimed to erase the memory of Ağa Kapısı totally (quoted from Hatt-
ı Hümayun in Lûtfî Efendi: 118-9).
REFERENCES
Çelik, Z., 1993. The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City In the Nineteenth
Century. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
Ergin, O. N., 1995. Mecelle-i Umur-ı Belediye. İstanbul: İstanbul Büyük Şehir
Belediyesi Kültür İşleri Daire Başkanlığı Yayınları.
Lûtfî Efendi., 1999. Vak’anüvîs Ahmed Lûtfî Efendi Tarihi, (Transcription Ahmet
Hezarfen). İstanbul: YKY.
Tekeli, İ., 1994. The Development of the Istanbul Metropolitan Area: Urban
Administration Planning. Istanbul: IULA-EMME. p.5.
Communication Address
Neşe Yeşilkaya
Gazi University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of
Architecture
06570 Maltepe / Ankara
Phone: +90 312 23174 00/2622
Fax: +90 312 2308434
E-mail: gurallar@gazi.edu.tr