UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

David –Lee; Buess

&
Rodney –Dale; Class

Petitioners Creditors Civil Action 1: 09- CV-02151 (HHK)

VS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA dba

CORPORATION ,et al.,
DEFENDANTS DEBTOR

OBJECTION & AMENDMENT

TO COURT FILINGS
INTENTENTIONAL FRAUD
BY DEFENDANTS AND THEIR
AGENTS NEW UNDISCLOURSE
EVIDENT CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS
Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT FILING IS LATE

NOW, COMES, The Petitioners David –Lee; Buess & Rodney –Dale; Class with

a OBJECTION& AMENDMENT TO COURT FILINGS INTENTENTIONAL FRAUD

BY DEFENDANTS AND THEIR AGENTS NEW UNDISCLOURSE EVIDENT

CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT FILING IS LATE.

The Petitioner well reminds Judge Kennedy of Title 28 Judiciary & judicial

procedures section 1652 ACT OF CONGRESS.

The petitioner's are going to address the 12 b 6 issue, every attorney that

represents any public office has always screamed 12 b 6. But yet they fail to define the

1
relief that they're looking for. These same attorneys that represent people like the

petitioners will never apply for 12 B6 on behalf of the people in the same court that the

petitioners and the defendants are in now. 12 B6 is granted whenever those who hold

public office uphold their obligation of contract and their constitutional oath when they

received their position and compensation for that public office. When they violate their

obligation of contract and they violate their oath of office they wave their 12 B 6. No

court has ever defined what a 12 B 6 is too which relief could ever have been granted.

The courts have failed and are reluctance to define what a12 B 6 is. This is proof of the

fraud when attorneys claimed this when they represent public officials and fail to claim

this on behalf of the people. This now is discrimination and a civil rights violation against

a class of people in this country that is being denied relief by people like the defendants

were the people like the petitioners are brought before them.

The defendants wanted 12 B6 then they are required to have upheld the obligation

of their contract to the people, their oath to the Constitution, to that position which they

hold. Their failure to uphold the integrity of that public office is a waiver to which relief

could have been granted. The petitioners have now defined the phrase 12 B 6.

1. Mr. Christopher W. Saunders being an agent of the Internal Revenue Service

and collection agencies of the Federal Reserve Bank has knowledge of the Congressional

records of 1913 -1993.

2 The defendant /s and their Agents being educated in and knowledge of the law

and taxes codes also have knowledge of the Congressional records of 1913 -1993.

2
 3. The defendants and their Agent had collected credit not real money as pointed

out in the congressional statements below. To which the Petitioner can produce as

factually Congressional Records as evident.

4. The defendants and their Agents are aware that the UNITED STATES

DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA comes under the federal constitution of

the eleventh amendment. No judicial power. The parties are aware that it took an Act of

Congress to create the Eleventh Amendment. That why the defendants had it moved to

this court and out of an Administrative Court.

5. Judge Henry H. Kennedy also being aware of the Congressional Records from

1913 -1993 and is required to keep this “SECRET” that there is no money just internal

currency and only the credit off of the people labor allow the defendants to created a

National debt as report in the 1933 congressional records by Mr. Mc Fadden There is no

real money just credit.

6 The defendants and their agents have committed fraud with intent to harm and

steal the identity of all America Citizens by stealing their credit under the Trading with

the Enemy Act combine with the fraudulent bankruptcy created in 1933. “Banking

Emergency Act”. This is done in violation of the Bill of Rights without so much as a

document signed from the Secretary of Treasury, a warrant, a Court order, A KISS MY

ASS or by my leave. The defendants have placed levy on the Bank accounts of the

Petitioners to with draw funds out of their accounts to create hardships and injuries.

7. The defendants and their agents know under the 1826 Bankrupt Bill that the

Secretary of Treasury, Comptroller of Currency and the Secretary of Agriculture were

placed in charge of the all bankruptcy and debt collection.

3
 8. The comptroller of currency under Statute at Large Vol.48 pages 1-112 is

required to settle all debts and the defendants and agents have full understanding and full

knowledge of this. The comptroller of currency is the person the defendants need to

address instead of the Petitioners by placing levy on them as there is no real money.

9. The Federal Constitution under the 14th amendment section 4 allow a bounty to

be placed on those whom have created such public debt and they are held accountable to

repay such debt by freezing their assets under such debt is paid back and cleared. The

Petitioner now ORDER the UNITED STATES DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA to up hold the Act of Congress under the 14th amendment section 4 bounty

of the public debt against the defendants and their agents until such Nation debt is paid

off by the defendants and their agents

10. Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT point out 26 USC 6331(a) which is levy and distraint.

Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT client JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON was aware of this Tax

Code when he allows the IRS agents to place a levy on the Petitioner David -L.; Buess

bank account with out a lawful court order. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON did

willfully violate the Bill of Rights under the Article 4 or the 4th amendment of the Bill of

Rights when he cover up for the IRS agents and allowed this to happen.

§ 6331. Levy and distraint

(a) Authority of Secretary

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days
after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such
further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all
property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334)

4
belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the
payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any
officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia,
or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by
serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer,
employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such
tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made
by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy
shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

11. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON operating as an Administrative Law Judge

knowing that the Internal Revenue Service is a “private independent establishment” of
the Federal Reserve Bank acting as their collection agency was required to protect the
Petitioner David L. Buess rights under the 4th article or amendment of the Bill of Rights.
His failure to follow procedure and Act of Congress and definitions as defined in 28 USC
451. Holding office during good behavior. There by willfully cause injury and harm to
the Petitioner, David L. Buess and violating his rights.

The term "judge of the United States" includes judges of the courts of
appeals, district courts, Court of International Trade and any court
created by Act of Congress, the judges of which are entitled to hold
office during good behavior.

12. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON being such a judge had full knowledge that

only those under 26 USC 6331 (a) being levy or distraint are for those who hold public

offices and not the people such as the Petitioners. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON

had the duty to up hold the Petitioner David -L.; Buess claim against the IRS in that

Court room. JUDGE REGINALD J. ROUTSON violated Article 1 section 10 clause 1

“Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts,” He violate his Constitutional Oath to up

5
hold the Supreme Law of the Law he also violate Title 10 Section 333 under the Army

Regulation 840-10 the Army flag flying in his courtroom .

13. Mr. JUSTIN M.FLINT made comments of the F.S.I.A of the defendants being

under foreign state. It’s a Congressional fact that the defendants and their agents come

under the International Organizations Immunities Act, December 9, 1945 (I.O.I.A) under

the United Nation jurisdiction. The defendants were required to give the same immunity

and 12 b 6 to the Petitioners as they now expect out of this Court. The defendants’ failure

to comply with this Act of Congress has waived the relief that could have been granted.

It is also an Act of Congress that the defendants and their agents hold a 14th

amendment citizenship as foreign agents to the Federal District of D.C .and not the

State of DC under the Reconstruction Act of 1867.To ware the People of this Country

hold a Natural liberty..

The term "agency" includes any department, independent

establishment, commission, administration, authority, board or bureau
of the United States or any corporation in which the United States has a
proprietary interest, unless the context shows that such term was
intended to be used in a more limited sense.

The term "department" means one of the executive departments

enumerated in section 1 of Title 5, unless the context shows that such
term was intended to describe the executive, legislative, or judicial
branches of the government.

TITLE 5 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 105 Executive agency

For the purpose of this title, “Executive agency” means an Executive
department, a Government corporation, and an independent
establishment.

6
5 U.S.C. § 556 : US Code - Section 556: Hearings; presiding employees; powers and
duties; burden of proof; evidence; record as basis of decision

(d) Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the
burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a
matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly
repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on
consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by
and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
The agency may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the
underlying statutes administered by the agency, consider a violation of section 557(d) of
this title sufficient grounds for a decision adverse to a party who has knowingly
committed such violation or knowingly caused such violation to occur. A party is entitled
to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal
evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true
disclosure of the facts. In rule making or determining claims for money or benefits or
applications for initial licenses an agency may, when a party will not be prejudiced
thereby, adopt procedures for the submission of all or part of the evidence in written
form.
14. The defendants and their agents might have had jurisdiction at one time, but

they lost it when they denied the Petitioners due process. The defendants and their agents

have full knowledge the bankruptcy of 1933 and the Acts of Congress and the intent of

these Acts as placed on the floor of Congress. They willfully with intent failed to

disclosures this issue to the Petitioners to which the Petitioner could have receive relief..

It is a Congressional fact in Congressional Records

1. Congressional Records show in 1916 Mr. McAdoo The Secretary of the

Treasury point out that the Since the Federal Reserve Banks are, as I have

7
 already stated, private corporations, just as are the national banks, the duty

of providing the necessary storage vaults and of assuming the custody and

control of these trust funds.

2. In 1917 Mr. Lindbergh brought action before Congress against the Federal

Reserves for corruption and impeachment.

3. In 1932 Mr. McFadden brought his claim before Congress showing was the

Federal Reserve took over 60 and half billion dollars in gold out of the united

States Treasury in or around 1928 before the Wall Street crash in 1929 and

before the Banking Emergency Act was declare to cause this Nation to

become Bankruptcy.

4. In 1932 Mr. McFadden on the floor of Congress stated that the Federal

Reserve was funding the Country of Germany just before World War II

started with the gold removed from the united States treasury.

5. In the March 1933 Congressional Record of the House It Quoted” the money

so issue will not have one penny of gold coverage behind it., because it is

really not needed. We do not need gold to back our internal currency” (end of

quote)

6. In the 1933 Congressional Record of the House; I Quote “The money will be

worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the CREDIT OF THE

NATION. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of

all the people in the nation” (end of quote)

8
7. In 1993 MR, Traficant on the floor of Congress speech. Found under: united

States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303“ Mr.

Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11 Members of Congress are

official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt

entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth

hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a

coroner's report that will lead to our demise.

8. The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of

sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the

international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock

and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law

making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in

1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although

post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3] The Federal

Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the

federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender,

and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating

exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears

the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the

interest, or premiums are the same.

9. Federal Reserve Act (1913)"Hypothecated" all property within the federal

United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the

Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee)

9
 was registered as a” beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In

1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future

properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S.

citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

10. Congressional Record will show when The Bankruptcy Bill of 1826 and the

Federal Reserve Act 1913 was created it place all land under agriculture.

11. Congress just passed new agriculture law “Farm Bill” preventing the people

from growing a gardening on their property as all private ,business,

commercial property ,etc comes under agriculture

12. Congressional Record Shows the federal United States did have assets;

because the Federal Reserve stole 60 and half billion dollars in gold, before

1928. The federal United States has agrees to assign the private property of

the U.S. citizens as collateral against future debt from the Federal Reserve.

The federal United States also pledged the unincorporated federal territories,

national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as

collateral against the federal debt.

CONCLUSION

The Petitioners will point out that Judge Henry H. Kennedy and the

defendants and their agents has failed to disprove any of the Petitioners Facts in

Law, Acts of Congress, U.S.C.., CFR, Statutes at Large, Court decisions,

Regulation, Procedures and etc. Now the Petitioner are placing Congressional

10
Statements from 1913 to 1993 of the 1933 Bankruptcy as held on the floor of

Congress to be rebutted or be proven false by the defendants and their agents and

this Court when the Congressional record proves the Petitioners case. Judge

Henry H. Kennedy, the defendants and their agent’s failure to dispute or rebut

these Act of Congress or the Rules of Law when the defendants and their agents

had Judge Henry H. Kennedy dismisses this case in September 2nd of 2010. This

is just cause to validate the Rule 60 claim of FRAUD.

The Petitioners will also address that the Petitioners never receive

any such judge from the Clerk of Court of any order on September 2, 2010 of the

motions to dismiss. It was not until December 28th 2010 or their about were the

Petitioners notify of such ruling after the Court and the defendants new the

Petitioners Appeal time ran out, then the Petitioner were notified .

The Petitioners keep laying out the U.S.C., CFR, Congressional Records,

Statutes at Large, Rules ,Regulation, Procedurals violation, etc,etc,etc,etc. .The

Petitioners has now proven that their no end to the corruption, to these public

office and private corporation to steal the people credit.

The secret behind the 1933 Banking Emergency Act and the misuse of the

Trading with the Enemy Act is no longer a “SECRET” the cat is out of the bag

and it all over the international and nation internet. The C.R.IS. , C.U.I.SP, and

the private money laundering is now all out in the open of these courts and their

attorneys. These actions violate the compensation clause of these public offices in

the constitution and violate the Obligation of Contract to the people for honest

11
 service. These actions violate the Bill of Rights 4, 5,6,7,8, 9 & 10 and it violates

11th amendment no judicial power.

The Petitioners come to this court with clean hands and in honor, which is

more then the defendants did. The Petitioners try to be fair, reasonability and all

we wanted was for the defendants to leave us alone and go to the comptroller of

currency and settle the dispute. The defendants knew, you as a federal judge know

this and the petitioners have known that there is just credit and not real value to

the money. This is why on the news that the United States is talking about getting

back on the gold standard in order to back its money..

How much further you want to push this issue?

Declaratory judgment

As the defendants has giving this Court jurisdiction under 28 USC 1442 to make

ruling. The Court has only one choice and that choice is to declare fraud upon the

defendants and their agents, hold them accountability under the Act of Congress and the

federal constitution 14th amendment section 4 bounties against the public debt.

The defendants are now responsible for all public debt of this Nation now and

any future public debt created by this Nation. The Petitioners will now set the proper

jurisdiction under 28 USC 1346, 1343, 1652 to set this Court Hearing for trial date and

for a trial by jury and allow a jury to Rule on these issue. Judge Henry H. Kennedy has

shown to be bias and Prejudiced and the Petitioners Demand for Judge Henry H.

Kennedy to refusal himself off this case and for a New Title 5 USC 3105 Administrative

12
Law Judge to step and hear this case. The petitioners now demand for this hearing to take

place.

CURE

The petitioners now come in as the Creditors of our trust and demand an audit of

such trust. The Petitioners demands an accounting for any and all shortages of our trust,

and as the defendants are the Debtor and now can be held accountable for such shortages

from the Petitioner trust by such Act of Congress

To have the trust release over to the Petitioners as that trust is credit and not gold

backed

. ALL RIGHT RESERVED TO AMEND WITHOUT LEAVE OF COURT

_______________________________
David- Lee; Buess
Private Attorney General
22014 Delaware Township Road 184
Arlington, Ohio [45814]
419 694 5796

_________________________
Private Attorney General Seal Rodney -Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
P.O. Box 435
High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]
704 742 3123

13
 PROOF OF SERVICE
I, David- Lee; Buess & Rodney- Dale; Class come with, OBJECTION& AMENDMENT

TO COURT FILINGS INTENTENTIONAL FRAUD BY DEFENDANTS AND THEIR

AGENTS NEW UNDISCLOURSE EVIDENT CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS Mr.

JUSTIN M.FLINT FILING IS LATE. this being placed before the Clerk of Court of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA on this

day of _____________ and month of_____________ in the year of our Lord 2011 AD.

Service will be delivered by U.S.P.S. certified mail with green card return.

_____________________________
David Lee; Buess
Private Attorney General
22014 Delaware Township Road 184
Arlington, Ohio [45814]
419 694 5796

_____________________________
Rodney Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
P. O. Box 435
High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]
704 742 3123

Cc:
Christopher Wright Sanders
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division
P.O. Box 227
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044

14
Franchise Corporation
STATE OF OHIO dba Corporation
LAW FIRM RICHARD CORDRAY
30 E. Broad Street, 17th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215

Employee of Corporation
REGINALD J. ROUTSON
300 South Main Street
Findlay, Ohio 45840

Franchise Corporation
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA dba Corporation
LAW FIRM ROY COOPER
9001 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-9001

Employee of Corporation
GASTON COUNTY dba Corporation
TAX DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 1578 Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
Defendants
Secretary Janet Napolitano
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Rep. Bennie G. Thompson

U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20515

Coast Guard Headquarters

Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard,
2100 Second Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20593

15