Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Business Ethics.
http://www.jstor.org
Journal of Business Ethics (2006) 67:201-217 ? Springer 2006
DOI 10.1007/sl0551-006-9024-6
ABSTPJVCT. Within the limited, but growing, litera of ethnic minority enterprises (Ede et al., 2000;
ture on small business ethics almost no attention has et al., 2003).
Spence
been paid to the issue of social responsibility within This with is
pre-occupation larger organisations
ethnic businesses. a social
minority Using capital per all the more surprising when one considers the social
this paper on an and
spective, reports exploratory and economic of smaller firms to a
into
importance
qualitative investigation the attitudinal and
modern economy. In the U.K. for instance, small
behavioural manifestations of CSR within small and
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) constitute
medium-sized Asian owned or firms in the
managed
over 99% of all businesses and make significant
U.K., with reference to the distinctive factors
particular
It offers alternative contributions to employment, wealth creation,
motivating organisational responses.
of behaviour and investment, innovation and overseas trade. Within
explanations entrepreneurial suggests
areas for further research. the SME sector, ethnic minority businesses represent
around 10% of the total business stock (Barclays
KEY WORDS: Corporate social responsibility, ethnic Bank, 2005). According to the 2001/02 Annual
minority businesses, small and medium-sized enterprises, Local Area Labour Force the level of self
Survey
social drivers of CSR
capital, community engagement,
employment for all ethnic groups mirrors that of the
white community at around 11%, although rates of
s some ethnic
elf-employment among groups (e.g.
Pakistani and Chinese) are considerably higher
Introduction (Barclays Bank, 2005).
It is against this background that the study re
Questions concerning the role of business in ported below was undertaken. In essence the main
society have
engaged academics and practitioners
aim of the research, which was carried out in 2003,
for over three decades and have rise to a was to examine how social responsibility was
given
burgeoning body of literature on the basis for and understood and practised within the Asian small
relative merits of greater corporate social respon business community in the U.K. and to investigate
sibility (CSR) (Carroll 1999; Friedman, 1970). As what motivated Asian small firm owners and/or
the latter phrase implies, the focus of much of this managers to engage in CSR. Given the virtual ab
literature has been the activities of larger firms, sence of any prior research in this area, an
explor
transnational in atory rather than a hypothesis-led approach was
particularly corporations operating
the mainstream of corporate adopted in order to build up a picture of current
experience (Spence
et al., 2003). Only has the concept of experience and practice. Using a framework of social
infrequently
social responsibility been applied to the attitudes capital theory, the intention is that this study will
and behaviour of smaller businesses (Quinn, 1997; provide initial insights into CSR in Asian SMEs and
Spence, 1999; Spence and Rutherfoord, 2001; will form the baseline for further research into eth
Vyakarnam et al., 1997). Nowhere is this observa ical behaviour within ethnic minority communities
tion more pertinent than with respect to the study in the U.K. and elsewhere.
202Ian Worthington et al.
(1995) define it as "the sum of the actual and build upon their personal and social ties to engage in
potential resources embedded within, available actions which can help to develop organisational
through, and derived from the network of rela social capital (see below). For smaller family enter
tionships possessed by an individual or social unit." prises in particular (e.g. micro firms), there tend to
While Putnam (2000, p. 19) states that it refers to be blurred boundaries between the household and
"connections among individuals-social networks and the firm (Baines and Wheelock, 1998), a fact which
the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that allows the organisation to draw substantially upon
arise from them." resources inherent in family ties and informal rela
Boiled down to its essence, social capital concerns tionships as well as those embedded in business
the resources which reside in, and emanate from, networks and other forms of association.
respect, friendship); what Portes (1998) deems the Social capital and CSR
positive outcomes of sociability. Like other forms of
- - seen
capital, it is normally though not invariably As implied in the discussion above, social capital also
as a beneficialresource, having linked variously been offers a useful tool for understanding business ethics/
to the development of human capital (Coleman, CSR within the small firm context (Spence et al.,
1988; Loury, 1977) and to the economic perfor 2003, 2004). Extant research on small firm attitudes
mance of firms (Baker, 1990), geographic regions and behaviour indicates that SMEs frequently and
(Putnam, 1993, 1995) and even nation states willingly engage in a variety of social, ethical and
(Fukuyama, 1995). environmental activities that involve interactions
While all organisations can provide institutional beyond their direct
commercial concerns (see e.g.
settings conducive to the development of social BCC, 2000) and which, as previously indicated, help
capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998), the concept to embed them more fully in the community in
Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility 203
which they exist and operate. Put simply, a firm's (Janjuha-Jivraj, 2003) and as a mechanism for
involvement in various forms of socially responsible mobilising businesses' resources in the absence or
behaviour not only contributes to the "common insufficiency of external sources of assistance (Flap
good", but it can also help to build social capital for et al., 2000; Ram et al., 2003).
individuals, for the enterprise (Moon, 2001; Spence While theoretical explanations of Asian entrepre
and Schmidpeter, 2003) and for the community as a neurship per se remain a contested arena
(see e.g.
whole (Habisch, 2004). Barrett et al., 1996; Jones and Ram, 2003; Ram et al.,
Adopting a social capital approach to small firm 2000), there is broad agreement within the literature
CSR has analytical appeal, not least because social that the mobiUsation and exploitation of social capital is
- -
responsibility basically focuses on how firms do an
important
no means feature
though by unique
business and on the contributions
they make to the of Asian entrepreneurial activity. Moreover while the
economy and to society generally. In making such family and co-ethnic ties have been regularly identi
contributions through various forms of civic, social fied by researchers as key resources utilised within
and economic engagement, small firm owner
many Asian enterprises, a number of studies have
managers (and employees)their interact with a linked ethnic business to entrepre
development
variety of individuals and groups, thereby creating a neurial involvement in other networks and relation
network of formal and informal relationships within ships within the wider community, including business
(and sometimes beyond) the local community clubs and associations, chambers of commerce and
(Cooke and Wills, 1999) that act as both a source other forms of civic engagement (Amin, 1995;
and expression of social capital within a given spatial Bashir, 1991; Fadahunsi et al., 2000). In practice, of
context. This and its associated social course, with business and social net
engagement, engagement
capital, helps not only to create and sustain small firm works can stem from an entrepreneur's
of this kind
embeddedness, but can also provide certain
organi family and personal ties (Adler and Kwon, 2002),
sational advantages, including the development of building on the social capital of the latter to generate
social contacts and tacit knowledge that might prove mutually beneficial relationships which can satisfy a
commercially beneficial to the enterprise in the fu combination of business and social needs (Janjuha
ture (Habisch, 2004). Jivraj, 2003).
This theme of the interplay between business and
the social relationships and networks within which
Social capital and Asian small businesses firms are entwined is weU represented in the litera
ture and resonates weU with notions of CSR.
The importance of social capital to ethnic business Writers such as Basu (1998), Metcalf et al. (1996)
formation and growth has been a recurring theme in and Werbner (1990), all make the point that, in the
the literature of Asian entrepreneurship. Nowhere is value-system of Asian entrepreneurs, business tends
this more evident than in studies within the "cul to mean more than material enrichment or the
turalist" tradition which have tended to concentrate provision of a livelihood. Among the various stated
on the "ethnic" resources of minority groups, or implied non-material benefits of business life are
including the role of the family and social networks standing in the community and the ability to do
in and activ
good for that community: an explicit
encouraging sustaining entrepreneurial recognition
ity (Basu, 1998; Srinivasan, 1995; Werbner, 1990). that business can no be treated as a
enterprise longer
As Barrett et al. (1996) point out, family and com purely economic but is deeply
phenomenon
munity networks have been shown in past research to grounded in and shaped by its social and cultural
be extremely important within the Asian community environment. This environment resources
provides
as a source of business resources low-cost which the individual from can obtain
including entrepreneur
female labour and finance for business ventures. The his/herpersonal social network of family, friends and
support offered by the Asian community through the community such as interest free loans and uncosted
extended family and kinship ties has been portrayed labour: in short, transactions based on trust rather
as ameans by which Asian businesses have been able than enforced by law or contract, thereby saving the
to negotiate significant competition in their markets SME considerable expense and paperwork.
204Ian Worthington et al.
invest in social relations according to the expected express "the desire to give
something back to the
value of the social resources made by these available community" (Janjuha-Jivrav 2003, p. 41). This
relations" (Flap et al., 2000, p. 147). In this sense, it "giving back" can take many forms and in the fol
might be said that CSR itself is neither more nor less lowing sections we intend to build upon and flesh
a
than process of investment in social capital, inwhich out these insights with explicit reference to CSR.
ostensibly altruistic behaviour may actually achieve a
long term pay-back in terms of enhancing the firm's
reputation, creating a favourable climate of opinion The study
towards it and possibly even attracting reciprocal fa
vours. Certainly the business by owners interviewed Aims and focus
Spence (2003) were
et al. actively developing and
sustaining their social capital networks by all manner As indicated
above, the research was designed to
of engagement with the wider community across a explore CSR practices and motivations within Asian
range from volunteerism and charitable donation to owned or Asian-run SMEs in order to provide insight
civic service as JPs and elected councillors. into the links between smaller Asian businesses and the
Interestingly one of the firms highlighted by these communities inwhich they operate. For the purposes
authors as particularly heavily involved in charity of this study SMEs were defined as having fewer than
work was an Asian-owned family business. While 250 employees in keeping with European Union
one example in itself is hardly indicative, elsewhere definitions. Rather than having a single research
in the literature the case for the strength of ethnic question, the study focused on a number of key issues
minority social capital networks is certainly vigor pertinent to the notions of CSR and social capital.
ously canvassed. Writers like Flap et al. (2000) and These included: (1) owner?manager understanding of
Portes (1998) argue that ethnic minorities have and attitudes to CSR (2) actions taken in pursuit of a
denser and stronger community networks than those more socially responsible approach (3) drivers of
of the general population and operate in a social socially responsible behaviour (4) perceptions of
context where informal contractual obligations can organisational benefit from CSR (5) structural
be powerfully enforced
by the moral authority of the arrangements for CSR (6) barriers to involvement in
community. is to be ostracised, a form of
To default social, ethical and environmental issues.
were examined in the following towns and cities in a series of questions aimed at
eliciting information on
the U.K.: Birmingham, Blackburn, Bolton, Brad organisational attitudes, beliefs and assumptions
ford, Cardiff, Glasgow, Leeds, Leicester, London regarding CSR. Some questions utilised a Likert
and Manchester. All 32 firms participated in the ranking scale to indicate either relative importance
survey and 30 in the interview phase of the project. attached to or levels of agreement/disagreement
Locating firms who were willing to participate in with specific propositions; others called upon
the research was not a simple task. Apart from the respondents to consider which of a series of state
well-known problems of securing research access to ments most closely matched the views of their
SMEs in general, ethnic minority businesses can organisation. In Section C (20 questions) the focus
a to the researcher, was on issues related to actions and
present significant challenge organisational
given that many ethnic minority firms do not appear practices, with most questions based on yes/no
in business directories and are often not to be found responses.
on the databases of local business support institu The second stage of the project comprised of
tions. To overcome these difficulties, the research semi-structured interviews with owner?managers
team decided to seek access to a cross-section of and involved a more detailed discussion on how
Asian SMEs in different regions of the U.K. by social responsibility practised was
and understood
approaching influential Asian leaders and business within each firm and what influenced the organisa
groups who had
knowledge of local conditions. tion to become involved in CSR. The interviews
These gatekeepers were asked to assist in locating enabled to (1) provide their own
respondents
firms that exhibited behaviours consistent with the interpretations of CSR (2) explain in their own
notion of CSR. This approach is similar to that words their motivations for involvement (3) identify
adopted by Janjuha-Jivraj (2003) and is justifiable examples of different forms of community engage
given that the aim of the research was not to measure ment (4) suggest benefits which might accrue to the
the extent of CSR in ethnic small firms, but to gain organisation from investing in social capital via CSR.
an of how social responsibility was
understanding By splitting the information gathering process into
currently viewed and practised within Asian SMEs two separate parts, it was
possible
to cross-check
and to
explore owner-manager motivations. some of the information provided by the written
questionnaire and to explore in more detail those
Methodology employed areas of CSR and its associated social capital which
had meaning for Asian SMEs. In this way we were
The data collection process comprised two main able to add significant value to the project.
elements. First, each was asked to
respondent
and Randall, 1992; Randall and Fernandes, 1991). ganisations (around two-thirds) were family-owned
businesses.
were important to the enterprise, with 13 (41%) What clearly emerges from Table II is a picture of
that such issues were in strong for attitudes and
claiming "very important" support socially responsible
organisational terms. When asked to indicate to actions and recognition (when prompted by the
what extent their organisation was socially, ethically question) that CSR can have distinct organisational
and environmentally responsible, 13 (41%) claimed benefits, both in resource terms and in building
"a great deal", irrespective
of the size, age, sector, stakeholder relationships, advantages that might help
primary purpose or legal status of the enterprise. to
leverage commercial gain. The one area where
That said, many of the individuals questioned were respondents held mixed views was with
regard to the
generally unable to identify the key issues of CSR relative importance of social and economic goals,
which influenced the organisation's behaviour, with the numbers fairly evenly split between those
although
some reference was made to
making
a who thought CSR more important than profit,
contribution to the community and to environ those who believed the opposite and those who felt
mental concerns actions. In effect, the initial
and neither one
thing
nor the other.
the benefits of
responsibilitysocial either environmental areas, with donations to causes/local
outweigh (13 firms or 41%) or are equal to charities, sponsorship for local events, support for
the costs over time (11 firms or 34%) local schools and colleges, environmental initiatives
CSR can create value for the organisation and staff related
issues particularly prominent. The
(20 firms or 63%). picture that emerges from the survey (and which was
positive orientation towards social responsibility effort to community activities as well as donations in
exists
alongside
a more
pragmatic
concern with cash, goods and/or equipment. The fact that such
economic and commercial imperatives.
Moreover engagement occurred not just within but beyond the
while amajority of respondents evidently recognised local ethnic community clearly provided the enter
that CSR could help to create organisational prise with opportunities to create and/or sustain
advantage, many firms initially appeared unclear as both "bonding" and "bridging" social capital (for a
to what might constitute socially responsible discussion see e.g. Adler and Kwon, 2002; Putnam,
behaviour. 2000; Werner and Spence, 2004).
To obtain amore detailed insight into underlying Withregard to organisational practices for man
attitudes, beliefs and assumptions, respondents were aging CSR, 17 firms (53%) stated that their social,
subsequently invited to indicate the extent to which ethical and environmental objectives were reflected
they agreed or disagreed with a series of proposi in their mission statements, while a smaller number
tions, using a five point Likert scale. The summary claimed that they were also referred to in other
data from this part of the questionnaire are shown in documents (e.g. vision statements, business plans,
Table II below. annual reports or policy papers). Discussion of issues
Ian et al.
Worthington
TABLE II
practices
Being sociaUy, ethicaUy and environmentaUy 24 0
is linked to success
responsible organisational
improves in organisa- 24 1
Employee performance
tions which are and environ
sociaUy, ethicaUy
mentaUy responsible
Social, ethical and environmental 12 10
responsib?ity
ismore important than pursuing economic goals
(e.g. profit/growth)
Organisations should integrate social, ethical and 25
environmental into their core or
responsibility
ganisational strategies
An customers are 18 11
organisation's (or clients)
influenced by its social, ethical and environ
mental behaviour
of CSR was also evidently undertaken at Board level or goals regarding social, ethical and environmental
in over half of the respondent organisations (18 firms performance and only two (6%) claimed to have
or 59%). Only three firms (9%), however, said that made use of performance indicators in these areas,
choosing instead to designate an individual within This relative reluctance to publicise the firm's
the organisation to deal with the various areas of socially responsible behaviour in a formal manner
social, ethical and environmental concern. needs to be set in the context of each organisation's
The survey responses suggest that such concerns network of business and social relationships. As far
were integrated to some degree into the organisa as external involvement was concerned, 15
tion's daily activities and into management training respondents (47%) claimed that their firms had
programmes, with a few firms indicating that they collaborated with other organisations on social,
had adopted guideline policies and/or practices on ethical and/or environmental issues, while 25 (78%)
CSR. That said, only six (19%) of the organisations indicated that they had consulted to some degree
questioned indicated that they had set specific targets with external bodies or stakeholders in these areas,
Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility 209
TABLE III
Donations to causes 25 4
community
Donations to charities 26 3
of events 21 6
Sponsorship community (e.g. sport)
ognised in the local community. the majority of respondent organisations. Given the
nature of the sample, it was not surprising to find
that this positive orientation towards CSR was
The interview results tempered by a significant degree of pragmatism. For
opportunity to add value to the information derived more important once the organisation had achieved
from the questionnaires and to explore in more its commercial and economic goals and that the latter
detail some key areas associated with the idea of might be seen as the springboard from which action
CSR. As will be evident from the analysis below, in the wider community could be launched. As one
some important findings have emerged from this respondent put it:
210Ian Worthington et al.
"At this stage it is not the number one priority but views. One interviewee spoke of social responsibility
it will come to a stage when it will become as having both an "intrinsic" and "extrinsic" side:
number one... You can start to think about social
is very important, without "The intrinsic side is about your employees, cus
responsibility; profit
that you cannot be socially responsible." tomers, investors and .... On the
yourselves
This idea that CSR had both an internal and an deliberately engaged in such forms of CSR to build
external in a number of the inter both bonding and bridging social capital, but that
aspect emerged
Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility 211
this was a likely outcome of their actions, even if it reference to religious influence. "Doing your duty to
was serendipitous (Maskell, 2001). the community and workers" is one rather striking
"In my faith it is a responsibility to others rather appear to have had only very limited impact in shaping
than You have to see under you;
organisational attitudes and behaviour regarding so
yourself. people
we are so we to cial, ethical and environmental issues. Thus, whilst a
the ones, have contribute
lucky
to people who have not got what we have got." few observers claimed that government legislation and
had had some influence in areas such as
(Financial Services Company, Wales) regulation
waste disposal and packaging, most respondents felt
if from the environment
With regard to the motivations for engaging in little, any, pressure regulatory
activities which can help to develop individual and other than compliance. Equally, there appeared to be
social capital, the above quotes point no significant supply chain influences nor other
organisational
to a distinctive ethnic difference: namely that the stakeholder demands from customers, investors or
ethical beliefs and behaviour of some Asian entre community groups. This relative lack of external
preneurs appear to be shaped to a significant drivers can be explained in part by the size of the
degree
by the individual's prior philosophical and religious enterprises in the sample.
affinities (Chatterjee and Pearson, 2003). Where
true, it could be argued that such faith-based com Perceptions of benefit
mitments are likely to prove stronger and deeper
than more secular rationalisations, given that deities The survey data had revealed that respondents saw
are not
normally open to
negotiation. CSR as conferring benefits on the organisation both
That
said, it isworth noting that many of the other on the demand and supply side (e.g.
employee-linked
respondents in the case study sample tended to considerations). The interviews provided an oppor
rationalise their CSR efforts without any direct tunity to examine this perception in more detail and
212Ian Worthington et al.
to seek concrete evidence of organisational gain. It gained a better, more satisfied and more loyal
should be stressed that achieving commercial benefits workforce as a result of investing in social capital
increased revenue and/or was not a via CSR was a recurrent theme in the interviews.
(e.g. profits) pre
enterprises was frequently ad hoc, informal and reac involved in formal community roles, the commit
tive, although some businesses had built up regular ment of personal
time and expense
was often sub
patterns of support for various charities, local causes stantial, with little, if any, tangible return for the
and organisations (e.g. sports clubs) and some indi organisation. For more
recently established enter
viduals had committed specific amounts of time to prises, business survival and growth understandably
roles in the local community (see above). were the key organisational goals.
significant
This informality was also reflected in internal
structures for managing social, ethical and environ
employees. If any discussion took place, this tended insight into the ethical attitudes, behaviour and
to be at board level (orwith partners) and there were motivations of an important but largely neglected
very few attempts to create a formal structure through element of the business community (Ede et al.,
which to manage CSR decisions, other than those 2000). Using the lens of social capital theory, the
associated with accreditation to the various external research has revealed that social responsibility is re
standards (e.g. Investors in People; the environ garded as an important business issue within the
mental management standard ISO 14001). U.K. Asian small business community, irrespective
With regard to performance measurement and of the size, age, sector, primary purpose or location
reporting, the picture was essentially the same, with of the enterprise. VirtuaUy aU the organisations
no real evidence of any attempt to set specific goals questioned a positive commitment
demonstrated to
or
targets for social, ethical or environmental per socially responsible behaviour, engaged in a variety
formance nor to establish performance indicators for of sociaUy responsible actions and did so notwith
measuring
outcomes. As for reporting
on the orga standing any benefits that such actions might bring
nisation's CSR activities, this was done largely on an to the organisation. Much of this activity tended to
informal, word of mouth basis both internally and be low key and informal, with firms quietly and
externally via the various
organisational networks. unobtrusively a
engaged in variety of actions in the
No audit existed of CSR within the respondent local community and beyond that provided oppor
enterprises. tunities for creating and/or sustaining both bridging
Given the size of the sample organisations and the and bonding social capital for the organisation.
stated predispositions of interviewees, none of these The evidence suggests that CSR is seen
accordingly often
uncoordinated, unplanned and their personal and emotional problems. A large part
non-strategic in approach. In this respect, Asian of the activity in this latter area reflected a pater
small firms in the U.K. appear to practice CSR very nalistic and moraUy based approach by employers to
much in line with their counterparts in the wider the weU-being and happiness of their staff. Such an
small business community (see below). approach had the concomitant effect of engendering
214Ian Worthington et al.
employee loyalty and commitment, thereby creating responsible manner. Though there is no direct evi
value for the organisation in the longer term. dence from the present survey, it seems unlikely that
While there was recognition that behaving in a religious faith would be cited by many non-Asian
socially responsible manner could provide both de British small firms as a motivation for CSR.2
mand and supply side benefits, this does not appear
to have been a significant factor in explaining why
the sample firms invested in social capital via CSR. Limitations and areas for further research
Nor could we find any substantial evidence that their
behaviour was shaped by external influences or was Small-scale, cross-sectional and exploratory studies
designed to be strategic (see e.g. Burke and Logsdon, have their limitations which we readily acknowl
1996; Lantos, 2001). Organisational and individual edge. Apart from issues of sample size and time
involvement in social, ethical or environmental frame, the focus of this study on smaU firm owners
initiatives appears to have been relatively ad hoc and and/or managers inevitably circumscribes our
driven predominantly by the personal attitudes, knowledge and understanding of the nature and
values and beliefs of the individuals owning and/or extent of CSR as practised within the Asian smaU
managing the respondent organisations. These atti business community. In this context we believe that
tudinal predispositions frequentlywere shaped in research which investigates the reservoir of social
turn by religious, cultural and/or moral influences capital tied up in employee/manager CSR-based
within the individual's environment. relationships might prove particularly informative,
How can we interpret the attitudes and actions of not least in shedding further light on the notion of
small Asian firms to the social responsibility agenda? organisational embeddedness, including issues of
On the one hand it can be argued that the trust, loyalty and mutual obligation.
evidence presented here indicates that the behaviour As Spence et al. (2003) have pointed out, reli
and predispositions of the respondent organisations gious and ethnic groups are also an area for future
mirror those of the U.K. small business community research and we would encourage more
investiga
generally, as indicated by recent research into CSR tions of CSR in other ethnic business communities
and smaller enterprises (BCC, 2000; BITC et al., in the U.K. and beyond,
in order to enhance our
2002). What the extant literature shows is that U.K. understanding of small firm engagement with the
small firms largely express a positive attitude towards social responsibility agenda. It would be interesting
the idea of social responsibility and many appear to to know, for example,
what differences, if any, ex
engage in a variety of actions in the local community isted in the interpretation and practice of CSR be
of the type revealed by this study. For the most part tween different ethnic business communities and
this activity takes place on an ad hoc, informal and how far the motivations for engagement revealed by
unstructured basis and is predominantly driven by this study were culturally distinctive both nationally
the philanthropic wishes of the owners and senior and cross-nationally. With respect to the latter issue,
managers rather than by
an
attempt to
leverage
or more work on the question of the link between
ganisational gain. Such engagement is normally CSR and perceptions of organisational advantage
characterised as "giving back to the local commu would be both timely and instructive, given gov
nity", underlining the moral basis of organisational ernmental attempts to spread the message that "it
decisions and responses. pays to be good" (see e.g. Irwin, 2002).
On the other hand it seems reasonable to argue Finally, the role played by civic engagement in
that what is perhaps distinctive about some of the building bridging social capital between the Asian
small firms in this sample is that their attitudes and small business sector and the wider community is
behaviour a religious rather than a secular basis
have worthy of further clarification. The present study has
that is rooted in the ethnic and cultural background indicated that in addition to engagement with
of individual entrepreneurs. As the analysis above has individuals and groups from their own ethnic
demonstrated, for a significant number of the case community,
some Asian small firm owner-managers
had a high priority and considerable time and effort to voluntary
study firms religious motives devoted
underpinned the notion of acting in a socially civic duties that benefited local citizens generaUy.
Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility 215
While there is no firm evidence from the research to the Sociology of Education (Greenwood, New York), pp.
motivated considerations of "bridge building", Bourdieu, P.: 1993, Sociology in Question (Sage, London)
by
L. and J. M. 'How
off-the record remarks by a number of interviewees Burke, Logsdon: 1996, Corporate
Socialresponsibility Pays Off, Long Range Planning
linked community engagement to notions of
down and
29(4), 405-502.
"breaking barriers", "reducing racism",
Business Community Connections (BCC): 2000, Con
"achieving greater integration". Whether this is
necting SMEs with theCommunity: A Research Report on
perception or reality merits serious investigation.
the Involvement of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
(SMEs) in Community Causes (BCC, London).
Notes Business in the Community (BITC) et al.: 2002, Engaging
SMEs in Community and Social Issues (Research
For the of the CSR was taken to Consortium Partners, London).
purpose study,
mean A. B.: Social
those forms of behaviour that (1) were beyond Carroll, 1999, 'Corporate Responsibility:
the were so Evolution of a Definitional Business and
simply legal minimum (2) concerned with Construct',
cial and/or environmental aspects of organisational Society 38(3), 268-296.
as weU as commercial indi Chatterjee, S. R. and C. A. L. Pearson: 2003, 'Ethical
behaviour, imperatives (3)
cated an ethical to business and other stake Perceptions of Asian Managers: Evidence of Trends in
approach
holder Pinkston and Six Divergent National Contexts', Business Ethics: A
relationships (see e.g. Carroll,
Amin, V.: 1995, and External Networks to the Cooke, P. and D. Wills: 1999, 'Small Firms, Social
Informal Paper
on Asian and the Enhancement of Business Performance
Conference Researching Entrepreneurship (Roe Capital
hampton Institute, London). Through Innovation Programmes', Small Business
Baker, W.: 1990, 'Market Networks and Corporate Department of Trade and Industry (DTI): 2002, Social
Behaviour', American Journal of Sociology 96, 589?625. A Success
Enterprise: Strategy for (DTI, London).
Barclays Bank: 2005, Black and Minority Ethnic Business Ede, F. O., B. Panigrahi, J. Stuart and S. Calcich: 2000,
Owners: A Market Research SME 'Ethics in Small Minority
Perspective (Barclays Businesses', Journal of Business
Research Team, London). Ethics 26, 133-146.
Barrett, G. A., T. and D. McEvoy: 1996, 'Ethnic Fadahunsi, A., D. Smallbone and S. 2000, 'Net
P.Jones Supri:
Minority Business: Theoretical Discourse in Britain and Ethnic
working Minority Enterprise Develop
and North America', Urban Studies 33(4/5), 783-809. ment:
Insights from a North London Study', Journal
Bashir, A.: 1991, Tackling the Barriers to
Enterprise. Paper
to
of Small Business and Enterprise Development 7(3), 228
the Conference on and 240.
Entrepreneurs Equal Oppor
tunity, University of Bradford. Fernandes, M. F. and D. M. Randall: 1992, 'The Nature
Basu, A.: 1998, 'An Exploration of Entrepreneurial of Social Desirability Response Effects in Ethics
Activity Among Asian SmaU Businesses in Britain', Research', Business Ethics 183-205.
Quarterly 2(2),
Small Business Economics 10, 313-326. H., A. Kumcu and B. Bulder: 2000, 'The Social
Flap,
Bourdieu, P.: 1986, 'The Forms of
Capital', in J. G.
Capital of Ethnic Entrepreneurs and their Business
Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for Success', in J. Rath (ed.), Immigrant Businesses: The
216Ian Worthington et al.
Economie, Political and Social Environment (Macmillan, Putnam, R. D.: 1993, 'The Prosperous Community:
London), pp. 142-161. Social Capital and Public Life', American Prospect 13,
Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of 35-42.
Business Is to Increase its Profits', The New York Times Putnam, R. D.: 1995, Alone: America's
'Bowling
Magazine, 13 September.
Declining Social Capital', Journal of Democracy 6,
Fukuyama, F.: 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the 65-78.
Creation of Prosperity (Hamish Hamilton, London) Putnam, R.: 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and
Habisch, A.: 2004, 'Social Responsibility, Social Capital Revival of American Community (Simon Schuster, New
and SMEs', in L. J. Spence, A. Habisch and R. Sch York)
midpeter (eds.), Responsibility and Social Capital: The Quinn, J. J.: 1997, 'Personal Ethics and Business Ethics:
World of Small andMedium Sized Enterprises (Palgrave The Ethical Attitudes of Owner/Managers of SmaU
Macmillan, Basingstoke), pp. 25-34. Business', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 119?127.
Holliday, R.: 1995, Investigating Small Firms (Routledge, Ram, M., B. Sanghera, T. Abbas, G. Barlow and
Lantos, G. P.: 2001, 'The Boundaries of Strategic Cor Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research', Journal
porate Social Responsibility', The Journal of Consumer of Business Ethics 10, 805-817.
Marketing 18(7), 593-630. Rudelms, W. and R. A. Buchholz: 1979, 'What Indus
G. O: 1977, 'A Dynamic of Racial Income trial Purchasers See as Ethical Dilemmas',
Loury, Theory Key Journal of
Differences', in P. A. Wallace and A. M. LaMonde and Materials 15(4), 2-10.
Purchasing Management
(eds.), Women, Minorities and Employment Discrimination Southwell, C: 2004, 'Engaging SMEs in Community
(Lexington Books, Lexington MA), pp. 153-186. and Social Issues', in L. J. Spence, A. Habisch and R.
Maskell, P.: 2001 ((or 2000) 'Social Capital, Innovation Schmidpeter (eds.), Responsibility and Social Capital:
and Competitiveness', In S. Baron, J. Field and The World of Small andMedium Sized Enterprises (Pal
T. Schuller, Social Capital: Critical Perspectives (OUP, grave Macmillan, Basingstoke), pp. 96-111.
Oxford), Chapter 6. Spence, L. J.: 1999, 'Does Size Matter? The State of the
McBain, R.: 2005, the Value of Human and Art in Small Business Ethics', Business Ethics: A Euro
'Appreciating
Social Capital', Henley Manager Update 16(3), 25-33. pean Review 8(3), 163-174.
McGrath, R., Jr. and W. L. Sparks: 2005, 'The Impor Spence L. J. A. Habisch and R. Schmidpeter.: 2004,
tance of Building Social Capital', Quality Progress 38(2), Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and
45-49. Medium Sized Enterprises (Palgrave Macmillan, Bas
England (Policy Studies Institute, London). Responsibility, Profit Maximisation and the SmaU
Moon, J.: 2001, 'Business Social Responsibility: A Source Firm Journal of Small Business and
Owner-Manager',
of Social Capital', Reason in Practice 3(1), 1-12. Enterprise Development 8(2), 126-139.
and S. Ghoshal: 1998, 'Social Spence, L. J. and R. 2003, 'SMEs, Social
Nahapiet, J. Capital, Schmidpeter:
Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advan Capital and the Common Good', Journal of Business
Academy ofManagement Review 23(2), 242-266. Ethics 45, 93-108.
tage',
L. A.
Pinkston, T. S. and A. B. Carroll: 1996, 'A Retrospective Spence, J., R. Schmidpeter and Habisch: 2003,
Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They 'Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized
Changed?', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 199-206. Enterprises in Germany and the UK', Journal of Business
Portes, A.: 1998, 'Social Capital: Its Origins and Appli Ethics 47(1), 17-29.
cations in Modern Annual Review of Soci Srinivasan, S.: 1995, The South Asian Petty Bourgeoisie: An
Sociology',
ology 24, 1-24. Oxford Case Study (Avebury, Aldershot).
Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility 217
Vyakarnam, S., A. Bailey, A. Myers and D. Burnett: Capital: The World of Small andMedium Sized Enterprises
1997, 'Towards an of Ethical Behav Macmillan, pp. 7-24.
Understanding (Palgrave Basingstoke),
iour in Small Firms', Jo urnal of Business Ethics 16, 1625
1636.
Werbner, P.: 1990, an Industrial Past: British Centre for Research in Ethnic Minority
'Renewing
Pakistani in Manchester', Migration
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship (CREME),
8, 7-41.
De Montfort University,
Werner, A. and L. J. Spence: 2004, 'Literature Review:
Leicester, LEI 9BH,
Social Capital and SMEs', in L. J. Spence, A. Habisch
UK
and R. Schmidpeter (eds.), Responsibility and Social