Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DEER NUMBERS
*At the beginning of this century there were few if any deer in NJ. Fish and Game, in
their 1990 report, “An Assessment of Deer Hunting in New Jersey”, shows us clearly
how our current state wide situation with deer began:
“Deer were re-established in New Jersey by sportsmen-conservationists for the purpose
of sport hunting. Since that “restocking period” the responsible agency (now the
Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife) has been managing the deer resource for this
purpose.” (pg.7)
In “An Assessment of Deer Hunting in New Jersey,” Fish and Game offered a detailed
example of this process:
“One of the most dramatic examples of the effect of habitat improvement or food
availability on reproductive capacity occurred in the Earle Naval Ammunition Depot in
Monmouth County. Range conditions improved in this case by an annual removal of deer
by hunting. Between 1968 and 1973 the reproductive rate almost doubled, an indication
that the herd was in much healthier condition. The estimated fawn crop in 1969 was 116
fawns produced by 122 females, a reproductive rate of 0.95 fawns per doe, compared to
1974 when 78 does produced 133 fawns, or 1.70 fawns per doe” (Burke et al. 1975)
* “The most visible weakness in the assertion that hunting is necessary to control deer
populations is that it has largely failed to do so over the last two decades. … Just
because deer are being killed doesn’t mean that deer populations are being controlled.”
--Allen T. Rutberg, Ph.D., “The Science of Deer Management: An Animal Welfare
Perspective,” in The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population
Management, William J. McShea, H. Brian Underwood, and John H. Rappole, eds.
Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington & London, 1997.
*"The long-range objective of our deer management program in N.Y.S. has been to
provide the largest possible harvest of antlered deer compatible with land use and deer
herd health . ...."
"It ensures that deer will be in good physical condition and can grow and reproduce at
optimum rates." -
The Conservationist, N. Y. S. D. E. C.
*SPORTS & LEISURE MAGAZINE July 2006, “Woods and Water,” by Tim
Wright. He writes: "With most deer populations being below management
goals, the number of deer management permits (DMP) will be reduced
significantly for this upcoming season, approximately 60 percent to about
49,000 permits. This will allow deer populations to start increasing
toward management goals."
The author then goes on about Quality Deer Management. He says "As deer
populations and success rates decrease, interest is rapidly growing in New
York in promoting an alternative deer harvest strategy known as Quality
Deer Management (QDM)."
*"New York State has rapidly seen its whitetail deer herd grow from modest thousands
to more than an estimated million animals today. Every county in the state has a good
population of deer, and many have too many. Management techniques by DEC have
changed from how to increase our herd to how to keep it under control and successfully
manage it for future sportsmen."
Bow Season Bounty by Craig Robbins, New York Sportsman, 9/2001
By the late 1800's in New York State, the white-tailed deer had been virtually eliminated
due to over-exploitation and land use practices. Tighter hunting restrictions along with
reductions in the legal "harvest" were implemented to save the remaining deer.
In 1912, New York State. passed the "buck law" which restricted hunters to killing only
bucks. The remaining does were then free to reproduce at their maximum capacity due to
less competition for available resources, such as food. According to The Conservationist,
the primary objective of this law was to foster the greatest population growth by
protecting all fawns and adult females from hunting. This regulation contributed greatly
to the increase and spread of the deer population that took place in the state during the
next thirty years.
*"Game management is the art of making land produce sustained crops of wild game for
recreational use."
- Game Management, Aldo Leopold
*The frequently heard justification of managers that they manage deer for the "carrying
capacity" of the range was a bit of self-delusion, often dressed up by the euphemism
"scientific management."
-. White-tailed Deer Ecology and Management, Wildlife Management Institute
The goal of a deer management program is arbitrary, not scientific, which may be
upsetting news to some wildlife biologists and other resource managers as well as
citizens. Science does not make the decision. People do. Protectionist groups have
recognized intuitively that decisions by biologists and managers may have been biased
toward hunter interests, as the overall goal of maintaining sustainable harvests has been
pursued.
.. Ibid.
Ideally, if the desired number of antlered and antlerless deer are taken each year, the
population will comprise the highest number of breeding females and lowest number of
adult males that collectively can be supported on the critical winter range. As a result, a
maximum fawn crop will be produced each summer.
The Conservationist, N. Y. S. D. E. C.
.......exploitation acts to reduce numbers. In doing so, it brings the population once more
below the level at which it is limited by environmental resources, effectively releasing the
density-dependent brake on population growth. Reproduction increases, juvenile
mortality falls, and the whole population's age structure shifts towards the young animals,
which have a faster growth rate and higher efficiency of food conversion. Productivity of
the population rises.
*Wayne Evans, PhD, assistant director of the State of New Mexico Department of Fish
and Game said, “No one will ever be so rash to claim that if there is no hunting, the
population will grow to infinity or sink to extinction. In fact, hunting maximizes fawn
production. . . . More animals are produced for the gun."
“The American Hunting Myth,” by Ron Baker (Vantage Press 1985). On page 79 Baker
quotes a portion of a July 26, 1978 letter by Evans to a Brandon Reines.
*"To many wildlife biologists and resource managers, it is an article of faith that deer
populations need to be hunted. That a hunting harvest is sustainable is not the same as
(its) being necessary. "
White-tailed Deer Ecology and Management, Wildlife Management Institute
* “The Good Old Days Are Now
Never before have New York's deer hunters been so successful
Success rates for bagging bucks have doubled in the past 20 years.
Hunter success has increased largely because many deer herds are now more productive.”
From the N.Y.S.D.E.C. Big Game Guide.
Here’s what Dave Arnold, a DNR executive, told the Free Press on Jan. 1, 1980:
“Don’t lose sight of the purpose of the (DRIP) program. When the DNR decided
several years ago to try and increase the herd to about one million animals, we knew
the auto collision rate and crop damage would rise.”
PREDATOR/PREY RELATIONSHIP
*Lack of predators: the prey population effects the number of predators, not vice versa:
The fact that in the majority of cases populations do eventually stabilize at some
equilibrium point even in predator-free environments suggests, however, that there must
also be a series of intrinsic factors which may effect population performance in these and
other deer populations, in such a way that populations will eventually stabilize on their
own.
- The Natural History of Deer, Rory Putman
DEER-CAR COLLISIONS
* See Dave Arnold in first section
*According to the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration, most car/deer
collisions happen during hunting season. It is not difficult to understand why the hunting
in the woods would send deer out onto the roads, in a panic.
An article in the Dec. 8, 1998 Trenton Times related a serious car/deer collision that
occurred on the opening day of the 1998 shotgun hunting season. A spokesman for the
state Department of Environmental Protection said, “the presence of hunters in the woods
puts animals, including deer and bear, on the run and often causes them to leave wooded
areas.”
*Sudharsan, K., Riley, S.J., Winterstein, S.R. (2006), “Relationship of autumn hunting
season to the frequency of deer-vehicle collisions in Michigan. Journal of Wildlife
Management 70(4):1161-1164.
“It can be reasonably argued that if in fact hunting advocates believe the rut is
partially to blame for these accidents, hunters who douse themselves in estrus deer
urine should be culpable.”
"What is the reason for the management problem? Hunters, who have paid
the freight with their license dollar, have always asked for more deer.
Biologists have responded with various techniques that allow deer herds to
build beyond the carrying capacity of the forests, and now they are paying
the penalty with declining forest regeneration. The basic premise is that
biologists have kept hunters happy but ruined the forest."
“The dilemma - hunters are never happy with the numbers of deer they see and forest
managers are never happy unless the forest dollars per acre are maximized.”
Dam, referring to a quote in the latest issue of National Wildlife, in an article entitled,
"How Deer are Redesigning Our Forests," by James P. Sterba, a staff writer for the Wall
Street Journal, uses Gary Alt's statement "deer management has been the biggest mistake
in the history of wildlife management." Alt refers to it as "malpractice." (Alt was the
Chief Deer Biologist in PA until he resigned in 2004).
LYME
* “Killing deer has been suggested as a way to attack Lyme disease. But experts say
such action is premature and dangerous. Deprived of their usual hosts, infected adult ticks
become a more immediate nuisance, as happened when deer on an island off
Massachusetts were virtually exterminated. Wandering ticks threatened the populace as
they searched for new hosts.”
(Consumers Reports June, 1988)
STARVATION
*As is pointed out at the beginning of this report, game species such as deer are
"managed" to produce a surplus of animals for hunting above what nature would be able
to create and maintain. As a result, a larger-than-normal number of deer - i.e., more than
the winter range can sustain - may be carried over into winter. Severe weather will reduce
the herd through winter kill regardless of the "success" rate of hunting in the fall.
*Weather influences the movement, productivity, and mortality rate of white-tailed deer
by affecting the growth and seasonal availability of food and by placing an energy stress
on (the) animals.
- White-tailed Deer Ecology and Management, Wildlife Management Institute
*In a corralled herd of white-tailed deer in N.Y.S., the average number of fawns born to
each female was 1.9 when food was plentiful, but dropped to only 0.43 when food was
scarce owing to higher (emphasis added) population densities. (Chaetum and
Severinghaus,1950).