Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13

Hydrometallurgy 60 Ž2001.

185–197
www.elsevier.nlrlocaterhydromet

Enhancement of chalcopyrite leaching by ferrous ions in acidic


ferric sulfate solutions
Naoki Hiroyoshi ) , Hajime Miki, Tsuyoshi Hirajima, Masami Tsunekawa
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido UniÕersity, Kita 13 Nishi 8, Sapporo, 060-8628, Japan
Received 1 July 1999; received in revised form 24 May 2000; accepted 13 September 2000

Abstract

The effects of ferrous ions on chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric ions in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid solutions were
investigated by leaching experiments at 303 K in nitrogen. With high cupric ion concentrations, the chalcopyrite oxidation
was enhanced by high concentrations of ferrous ions and copper extraction was mainly controlled by the concentration ratio
of ferrous to ferric ions or the redox potential of solutions. Ferrous ions, however, suppressed the chalcopyrite oxidation
when cupric ion concentrations were low. A reaction model, which involves chalcopyrite reduction to intermediate Cu 2 S by
ferrous ions and oxidation of the Cu 2 S by ferric ions, was proposed to interpret the results. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.

Keywords: Chalcopyrite; Oxidation; Leaching; Ferrous ions; Ferric ions; Cupric ions, redox potential

1. Introduction ously, the authors found that ferrous ions act to


promote the chalcopyrite oxidation with dissolved
Dump leaching is used to recover copper from oxygen w2–5x, and this phenomenon may contribute
low-grade ores that would otherwise be waste and to chalcopyrite leaching near the surface of leaching
the importance of leaching in copper production is dumps. However, chalcopyrite oxidation with dis-
increasing w1x. However, the leaching rate of chal- solved oxygen is less important in the deep parts of
copyrite, an abundant copper mineral, is very low. leaching dumps because oxygen concentrations de-
To improve leaching rates, the factors affecting chal- crease rapidly with increasing depth. In the deep
copyrite leaching must be better understood. parts, ferric ions are the more important oxidant for
In the leaching, chalcopyrite is oxidized by ferric leaching chalcopyrite.
ions andror dissolved oxygen in sulfuric acid solu- There are several reports of the effects of ferrous
tion to extract cupric ions. During this process, fer- ions on chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric ions.
rous ions are also extracted from chalcopyrite. Previ- Dutrizac et al. w6x and Hirato et al. w7x reported that
ferrous ions suppress chalcopyrite oxidation with
ferric ions in sulfuric acid solution. However, there
)
Corresponding author. Tel.: q81-11-706-6315; fax: q81-11-
is a report implying that ferrous ions promote this
706-6315. reaction. Kametani and Aoki w8x investigated the
E-mail address: hiroyosi@eng.hokudai.ac.jp ŽN. Hiroyoshi.. effect of the solution redox potential on chalcopyrite

0304-386Xr01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 0 4 - 3 8 6 X Ž 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 5 - 9
186 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

leaching in the presence of ferrous and ferric ions, oxygen using the needles as inlet and outlet. Then
and reported that leaching rates increased with in- the needles were removed from the plug and the
creasing the potential but decreased above a certain flask was reciprocally shaken in a water bath at 303
critical potential. The potential of solutions contain- K Žamplitude 40 mm; shaking speed 120 strokes
ing ferric and ferrous ions increases with increasing miny1 .. After 24 h, the leaching solution was fil-
concentration ratios of ferric to ferrous ions. There- tered with a membrane filter Žpore size: 0.22 mm.
fore, Kametani’s result indicates that the rate of and the copper and total soluble iron concentrations
chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric ions is higher in were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
the presence of an adequate amount of ferrous ions The redox potential of the leaching solution was
than in the absence of ferrous ions. measured at room temperature with a platinum elec-
In the present study, leaching experiments were trode using a saturated AgrAgCl electrode as the
carried out in nitrogen to establish the effects of reference electrode and it was converted to values
ferrous ions on chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric against a standard hydrogen electrode ŽSHE.. Final
ions in sulfuric acid solutions and it was found that concentrations of ferric and ferrous ions were calcu-
ferrous ions promote the chalcopyrite oxidation in lated based on the solution potential and total soluble
the presence of high concentrations of cupric ions. iron concentration using the Nernst equation for
sulfuric acid solution containing ferric and ferrous
ions ŽEq. Ž1.. w9x and the mass balance equation for
2. Method soluble iron species ŽEq. Ž2...
w Fe 3q x
2.1. Chalcopyrite sample and leaching solution

A very pure massive chalcopyrite sample was


E s 0.670 q 0.059log
ž w Fe 2q x / Ž 1.

w Total Fex s w Fe 2q x q w Fe 3q x Ž 2.
ground with an agate mortar. The components of this
sample were: copper 33.32%, iron 29.63%, zinc where wTotal Fex, wFe 3q x and wFe 2q x indicate the
0.2%, lead - 0.01% and silica 0.28%. With X-ray concentrations of total soluble iron, ferric ions and
diffraction analysis, only chalcopyrite was detected ferrous ions, and E is the solution potential ŽV vs.
in the sample. The ground sample was dry-sieved to SHE..
obtain the y200 mesh portion, and the y65 q 100 To determine the amount of elemental sulfur
mesh chalcopyrite sample was prepared by wet siev- formed during the leaching, shaking flask experi-
ing and drying at room temperature. ments were carried out with 500-cm3 Erlenmeyer
Leaching solutions were 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric flasks containing 1.0 g of chalcopyrite and 100 cm3
acid containing various concentrations of ferric, fer- of leaching solution in the same manner. After 24 h,
rous, and cupric ions. Reagent grade FeŽSO4 . P 7H 2 O, the residue was recovered by filtration using 5-A
Fe 2 ŽSO4 . 3 P nH 2 O, CuSO4 P 5H 2 O, H 2 SO4 ŽWako filter paper and washed with 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric
Pure Chemicals Ltd.., and distilled–deionized water acid and distilled–deionized water, then dried in air
were used to prepare the solution. at room temperature. Elemental sulfur was extracted
to benzene from the dried residue using Soxhlet’s
2.2. Shaking flask leaching experiments extractor and the sulfur concentration was deter-
mined from the light absorbance at 330 nm.
Except where mentioned, the shaking flask leach-
ing experiments were carried out as follows: a 10-cm3 2.3. Column leaching experiments
portion of the solution and 0.1 g of y200 mesh
chalcopyrite sample were mixed in a 50-cm3 Erlen- Column leaching was performed with the appara-
meyer flask and the flask was capped with a silicon tus outlined in Fig. 1. A glass tube Žinner diameter
rubber plug. Two injection needles were inserted 3.5 mm, height 10 cm. with a glass ball filter was
through the plug and 1 dm3 miny1 of nitrogen was used as the leaching column, and 0.50 g of the
introduced into the flask for about 15 min to remove chalcopyrite Žy65 q 100 mesh portion. was placed
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 187

Fig. 1. Column leaching arrangement.

in the column. Leaching solution was pumped to the trations of ferric, ferrous and cupric ions and the rest
column at 100 cm3 dayy1 from a leaching solution potential was measured using saturated Ag–AgCl
reservoir set in a water bath at 303 K. During the electrode as reference electrode at 303 K in nitrogen
experiments, nitrogen was introduced into the reser- with stirring. Significant changes in the potential
voirs to remove oxygen. The solution collected in the were not observed in 10 min. In this paper, the rest
effluent reservoir was removed daily, and its volume potentials after 10-min immersion were shown in
and copper ion concentration were measured to de- values against SHE.
termine the amount of extracted copper.

2.4. Chalcopyrite rest potential measurements 3. Results

A chalcopyrite electrode was prepared from the 3.1. Shaking flask leaching experiments
massive ore used for leaching experiments. A regular
shape specimen was cut from the ore and ground to a Table 1 shows the amounts of copper extracted
thickness of about 5 mm by using a120, a600, and the elemental sulfur formed after 24 h in the
a1000 and a3000 alumina powder in this order. The presence of 0.03 mol dmy3 ferric ions with or
specimen was washed in distilled–deionized water without 1.00 mol dmy3 ferrous ions. The amounts of
with ultrasonic washer and rinsed with acetone. A extracted copper and elemental sulfur were larger
gold thin layer was then sputter deposited on one with ferrous ions and the mole ratio of extracted
side of the specimen to give an ohmic contact and copper to elemental sulfur is about 2 both with and
copper wire was connected on the gold layer with without ferrous ions. Because a large amount of
conducting silver resin. Then the specimen was em-
bedded in insulating resin to expose only one side of
Table 1
the chalcopyrite. Before each measurement, the ex-
Effects of ferrous ions on the amounts of copper extracted and
posed surface of chalcopyrite was ground with a3000 elemental sulfur formed after 24 h in the presence of 0.03 mol
alumina powder and washed in the same manner dmy3 ferric ions Žunit: mmol dmy3 .
described above. The exposed surface area was de- FeŽII. added Cu extracted S formed
termined by image analysis to be 0.64 cm2 . 0 0.52 1.03
The chalcopyrite electrode was immersed in 0.1 1000 1.43 3.14
mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing various concen-
188 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

Table 2 in the amounts of extracted copper between large-


Reproducibility of copper extraction in shaking flask experiments scale experiments wŽTable 1.x and small-scale experi-
using 50-cm3 flask containing 0.1 g chalcopyrite and 10 cm3
leaching solution at 303 K in nitrogen Žunit: mmol dmy3 .
ments wŽTable 2.x may be interpreted by the differ-
ence in solution stirring. The flask shaking condition
Condition 1 Condition 2
Žamplitude and frequency. was the same in both
Run 1 1.13 3.09
scales, so solution stirring was weaker in the large-
Run 2 1.12 2.99
Run 3 1.09 3.09 scale experiments than that in the small-scale experi-
Run 4 1.10 3.09 ments and this may have caused the smaller amount
Average 1.11 3.06 of extracted copper in the large-scale experiments.
Standard deviation 0.02 0.05 Leaching experiments were carried out in the
The solutions were 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing 0.03
presence of various concentrations of ferric and fer-
mol dmy3 ferric ions. In the experiments indicated as ACondition rous ions without cupric ions. Fig. 2 shows the initial
1B, ferrous ions were not added. In the experiments indicated as solution potential as a function of the initial concen-
ACondition 2B, 1 mol dmy3 ferrous ions were added. tration ratio of ferric to ferrous ions. A dotted line in
the figure corresponds to the Nernst equation shown
in Eq. Ž1. and the experimental results agreed well
chalcopyrite sample is needed for elemental sulfur with Eq. Ž1..
assay, these experiments were carried out in a large Fig. 3 shows the amount of extracted copper,
scale Ž500-cm3 Erlenmeyer flasks containing 1.0 g of ferrous ions and ferric ions after 24 h as a function
chalcopyrite and 100 cm3 of leaching solution.. of the initial ferrous ion concentration. Even without
However, most of other experiments were carried out the addition of ferric ions, ferric ions and extracted
in a small scale Ž50-cm3 Erlenmeyer flasks contain- copper formed after 24 h. With ferric ion addition,
ing 0.1 g of chalcopyrite and 10 cm3 of leaching the amounts of extracted copper and consumption of
solution. for saving the chalcopyrite sample. ferric ions increased when high concentrations of
Table 2 shows the reproducibility of the small- ferrous ions were added. In all cases, ferrous ion
scale leaching experiments. In this series of experi- concentration after 24 h was almost the same as the
ments, copper extraction after 24 h was investigated initial concentration.
in the presence of 0.03 mol dmy3 ferric ions with or Figs. 4 and 5 show the amounts of extracted
without 1.00 mol dmy3 ferrous ions repeatedly. The copper after 24 h as a function of the initial ferrous
results indicate that enough reproducibility was ob- to ferric ion concentration ratio ŽFig. 4. and as a
tained in the small-scale experiments. The difference function of the initial solution potential ŽFig. 5.. The

Fig. 2. Relationship between the initial concentration ratio of ferric to ferrous ions ŽwFe 3q x 0rwFe 2q x 0 . and the initial redox potential Ž E . in
0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid.
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 189

Fig. 3. Effect of initial ferrous ion concentration ŽwFe 2q x 0 . on the leaching of a y200 mesh chalcopyrite sample with 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric
acid containing various initial concentrations of ferric ions ŽwFe 3q x0 .. Leaching time was 24 h.

amount of extracted copper mainly depended on the leaching experiments were carried out. The experi-
ferrous to ferric ion ratio or the potential, and in- mental conditions and results are summarized in
creased markedly at the ratios above 10 or at poten- Table 3. In the absence of oxidant ferric ions ŽNos. 1
tials below 610 mV vs. SHE. to 3., the amounts of extracted copper were negligi-
During the shaking flask leaching experiments, ble even with cupric ions or with ferrous and cupric
cupric ions were extracted from chalcopyrite and ions. However, in the presence of ferric ions ŽNos. 4
accumulated in the solutions. To clarify the role of to 7., more than 1 mmol dmy3 of copper ions was
cupric ions on chalcopyrite leaching, a series of extracted. The amount of extracted copper in the
190 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

Fig. 4. Relationship between initial ferrous to ferric ion concentration ratios and the amount of copper extracted from a y200 mesh
chalcopyrite sample after 24 h in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing various initial concentrations of ferric ions.

presence of ferric ions was the largest when ferrous experiments. At the desired time interval, a 1 to 2
and cupric ions coexisted ŽNo. 6., and larger with cm3 of solution was sampled using an injection
ferrous ions alone ŽNo. 5. than without ferrous and needle inserted through the silicon rubber plug and
cupric ions ŽNo. 4.. With only cupric ions added to nitrogen was introduced for about 15 min for keep-
the ferric solution ŽNo. 7., the amount of extracted ing anaerobic conditions. Without ferrous and cupric
copper was almost the same as that without cupric ions, only about 10% of the copper was extracted
ions ŽNo. 4.. even after 27 days. When only ferrous ions were
Fig. 6 shows the effect of cupric and ferrous ions added to the ferric solution, the leaching rate was
on the copper extraction and solution redox potential almost the same as that without ferrous ions during
behavior in the presence of 0.25 mol dmy3 ferric the initial period but became higher after 4 days and
ions. The experiments were performed with 500-cm3 about 75% of the copper was extracted after 27 days.
flasks containing 250 cm3 of leaching solution and When cupric and ferrous ions were added, the leach-
2.5 g of the chalcopyrite in nitrogen. Temperature ing rate was higher from the beginning and the
and shaking conditions were the same as in other fraction of extracted copper reached about 70% after

Fig. 5. Relationship between the initial redox potential of solution Ž E . and the amount of copper extracted from y200 mesh chalcopyrite
sample after 24 h in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing various initial concentrations of ferric ions.
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 191

Table 3 concentrations of ferrous ions. The experiments were


Effects of ferric, ferrous and cupric ions on chalcopyrite leaching carried out with a 50-cm3 flask containing 10 cm3
in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid at 303 K in nitrogen
solution and 0.1 g of the chalcopyrite sample. The
No. Experimental conditions Results
amounts of copper ions accumulated in the solutions
wFe l 3qx 0 wFe 2q x 0 wCu2q x 0 Cu extracted were considerably lower than with the y200 mesh
Žmol dmy3 . Žmol dmy3 . Žmol dmy3 . after 24 h
chalcopyrite ŽFig. 3.. As shown in Fig. 7, copper
Žmmol dmy3 .
extraction was not enhanced by adding ferrous ions
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61
with the y65 q 100 mesh chalcopyrite, while it was
2 0.00 0.50 0.01 0.21
3 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.21 markedly enhanced with the y200 mesh sample
4 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.08 ŽFig. 3..
5 0.03 0.50 0.00 1.66
6 0.03 0.50 0.01 3.28
7 0.03 0.00 0.01 1.02
3.2. Column leaching experiments

To investigate the effect of ferrous ions on chal-


copyrite leaching behavior at extremely low cupric
25 days. In all cases, solution potential decreased ion concentrations, column leaching experiments
with time. were carried out in 0.01 mol dmy3 ferric ion solu-
Fig. 7 shows the results of the shaking flask tions with or without 0.50 mol dmy3 ferrous ions.
experiments using the y65 q 100 mesh chalcopyrite To confirm the reproducibility, experiments were
in 0.03 mol dmy3 ferric solutions containing various duplicated in each condition. In the column leaching,

Fig. 6. Effect of ferrous and cupric ion addition on the leaching behavior of a y200 mesh chalcopyrite sample with 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric
acid containing 0.25 mol dmy3 ferric ions.
192 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

Fig. 7. Effect of initial ferrous ion concentration ŽwFe 2q x 0 . on the amount of copper extracted from y65 q 100 mesh chalcopyrite sample
after 24 h in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid. Initial ferric ion concentration: 0.03 mol dmy3 .

Fig. 8. Effect of ferrous ion on copper extraction in column leaching with 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing 0.03 mol dmy3 ferric ions
at 303 K in nitrogen.

Fig. 9. Rest potential of chalcopyrite Ž Ecp . as a function of ferrous ion concentration ŽwFe 2q x.. Solutions were 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid
containing 0.05 mol dmy3 cupric ions and various concentrations of ferric and ferrous ions.
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 193

Fig. 10. Rest potential of chalcopyrite Ž Ecp . as a function of cupric ions ŽwCu2q x.. Solutions were 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing 1
mol dmy3 ferrous ions and various concentrations of cupric and ferric ions.

copper ion concentrations in the effluent were mea- ing various concentrations of ferric, ferrous and
sured daily and less than 60% of those in the shaking cupric ions in nitrogen. As shown in Figs. 9 and 10,
flask experiments using the y65 q 100 mesh sample the rest potential was determined by the concentra-
ŽFig. 7. and less than 10% of those in the shaking tions of ferric and ferrous ions and was not affected
flask experiments using the y200 mesh sample ŽFig. by cupric ions. The potential decreased with ferrous
3. leached out. Fig. 8 shows the cumulated amounts ions and increased with ferric ions. Fig. 11 shows the
of extracted copper as a function of time. As shown relationship between the solution redox potential and
in this figure, reproducibility was enough and copper the rest potential of chalcopyrite in the presence of
extraction was suppressed by ferrous addition at the 0.05 mol dmy3 cupric ions and 0.03 or 0.25 mol
low copper ion concentrations. dmy3 ferric ions. The solution potential was adjusted
by adding various concentrations of ferrous ions.
3.3. Rest potential of chalcopyrite
When the solution redox potential was high, the rest
The rest potential of the chalcopyrite electrode potential of chalcopyrite was lower than the solution
was measured in 0.1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid contain- potential and it had a constant value that was deter-
mined by the ferric ion concentration. In the lower
potential region, however, the rest potential of chal-
copyrite gradually decreased with decreasing solu-
tion potential and was close to the solution potential.

4. Discussion

Chalcopyrite oxidation takes place with dissolved


oxygen andror with ferric ions in sulfuric acid solu-
tions:
CuFeS 2 q 4Hqq O 2 s Cu2qq Fe 2qq 2S q 2H 2 O
Ž 3.
Fig. 11. Relationship between the redox potential of solution Ž E . CuFeS 2 q 4Fe 3qs Cu2qq 5Fe 2qq 2S Ž 4.
and the rest potential of chalcopyrite Ž Ecp .. Solutions were 0.1
mol dmy3 sulfuric acid containing 0.05 mol dmy3 cupric ions Previous papers w2–5x reported that chalcopyrite
and various concentrations of ferrous and ferric ions. oxidation with dissolved oxygen ŽEq. Ž3.. is pro-
194 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

moted by ferrous ions. The present study set out to assume that copper extraction is due to chalcopyrite
clarify the effect of ferrous ions on chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric ions ŽEq. Ž4.. and there is no
oxidation with ferric ions ŽEq. Ž4.. and all experi- other reaction, the following relations are satisfied
ments were performed in nitrogen. during the batch leaching of chalcopyrite.
As shown in Fig. 3, when ferric ions were added,
high concentrations of ferrous ions enhanced copper w Cu2q x s w Cu2q x 0 q DCu Ž 6.
extraction and ferric ion consumption. Table 1 shows
w Fe 2q x s w Fe 2q x 0 q 5DCu Ž 7.
that the amounts of elemental sulfur formed during
the leaching was about twice the amount of extracted w Fe 3q x s w Fe 3q x 0 y 4DCu Ž 8.
copper both with and without ferrous ions. These
results imply that chalcopyrite oxidation due to ferric where, w J x 0 and w J x are the initial concentration and
ions ŽEq. Ž4.. is enhanced by ferrous ions. However, the concentration at a given time for species J, and
it is difficult to determine the effect of ferrous ions DCu is the amount of extracted copper.
on the stoichiometry of chalcopyrite leaching based Substituting Eqs. Ž7. and Ž8. into Eq. Ž1., the
on the results shown in Fig. 3, because the effect of following equation is obtained.
dissolved oxygen on the total copper extraction can-
w Fe 3q x 0 y 4DCu
not be ignored in these experiments as discussed
below.
If oxygen were completely removed from the
E s 0.670 q 0.059log
ž w Fe 2q x 0 q 5DCu / Ž 9.

system, there would be no copper extraction without Using this equation, the amount of extracted cop-
ferric ions. As shown in Fig. 3, however, even per, DCu, was calculated from the solution potential,
without ferric ion substantial amounts of copper E, and this theoretical amount was compared with
were extracted from chalcopyrite and ferric ions the experimental value. As shown in Fig. 12, there
were formed when ferrous ions were added alone. are deviations but the theoretical amounts of ex-
This indicates the presence of contaminant oxygen tracted copper almost match the experimental values
and that ferrous oxidation with the contaminant oxy- both in the case with and without ferrous ion addi-
gen takes place ŽEq. Ž5... tion. This indicates that copper extraction shown in
Fig. 6 is mainly due to the chalcopyrite oxidation
4Fe 2qq 4Hqq O 2 s 4Fe 3qq 2H 2 O Ž 5.

Therefore, it should be noted that chalcopyrite


oxidation with dissolved oxygen ŽEq. Ž2.. may occur
and contribute to copper extraction. Moreover, acid
soluble copper, which is due to the surface oxidized
matter formed during the preparation of chalcopyrite
sample, may contribute to the copper extraction
without ferric ions.
Extraction of acid soluble copper would be fin-
ished in a short period, so its contribution to total
copper extraction may be ignored in a long time
leaching. It is also expected that the effect of con-
taminant oxygen on copper extraction can be ignored
in a long time-leaching experiment if the contami-
nant oxygen is the oxygen remaining in flasks at the
beginning of experiments.
Considering the above, leaching experiments were Fig. 12. Plot of the experimental amounts of extracted copper vs.
performed in about 1 month to determine the stoi- the theoretical amounts using Eq. Ž9. and the solution potential
chiometory of chalcopyrite leaching ŽFig. 6.. If we data shown in Fig. 6. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 6.
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 195

with ferric ions ŽEq. Ž4.. and that ferrous ions do not and the potential difference was reduced with de-
affect the stoichiometory. Because the amount of creasing the solution potential as shown in Fig. 11.
extracted copper was larger with ferrous ions than Therefore, it may also be predicted that a lower
without ferrous ions ŽFig. 6., we can conclude that solution potential should cause slow copper extrac-
the ferrous ions enhance the chalcopyrite oxidation tion. However, these predictions conflict with the
according to Eq. Ž4.. observed results.
As shown in Figs. 4 and 5, copper extraction was If we use the model expressed by Eqs. Ž10. and
mainly controlled by the concentration ratio of fer- Ž11., the only way to avoid the conflict is to assume
rous to ferric ions or the redox potential of the the passivation of chalcopyrite in a higher potential
solutions Ža function of the concentration ratio., and region. In the case of metals like iron, the anodic
the extraction was enhanced at higher ferrous ratios dissolution rate and current increase with increasing
andror in the lower potential region. Figs. 9–11 potential but suddenly decrease at a passivation po-
show that the rest potential of chalcopyrite is deter- tential, due to the formation of a passive layer such
mined by the concentrations of ferric and ferrous as metal oxides on the metal surface. Warren et al.
ions and that it decreases with increasing ferrous w10x reported the passivation of the anodic dissolu-
ions, indicating that ferrous ions discharge on chal- tion of chalcopyrite in sulfuric acid solution. How-
copyrite surface, i.e. ferrous ions potentially act as a ever, the passive behavior of chalcopyrite is not
reductant on the mineral. These results imply that the similar to that of the typical passivating metals, i.e.,
ferrous-promoted chalcopyrite leaching is an electro- the anodic current due to Eq. Ž10. does not decrease
chemical phenomenon where ferrous ions act as a at a certain potential and the passive region can be
reductant. recognized as a region where the current is indepen-
The results in Table 3 and Fig. 6 show that dent from the potential w10x. Therefore, the passiva-
addition of cupric ions together with ferrous ions tion does not explain the drastic decrease in copper
enhanced copper extraction more than with ferrous extraction at higher potentials shown in Fig. 5.
addition alone. As shown in Figs. 7 and 8, ferrous To interpret the enhancement of chalcopyrite
ions suppressed chalcopyrite leaching when concen- leaching by ferrous and cupric ions, we propose the
trations of extracted cupric ions were low. These following two-step reaction model. In the presence
results indicate that cupric ions play an important of enough cupric and ferrous ions, chalcopyrite is
role in the ferrous-promoted chalcopyrite leaching reduced by ferrous ions to Cu 2 S according to
and that copper extraction is not enhanced with
ferrous ions alone. CuFeS 2 q 3Cu2qq 3Fe 2qs 2Cu 2 S q 4Fe 3q Ž 12 .
Generally, it has been accepted that chalcopyrite
oxidation with ferric ions ŽEq. Ž4.. can be decom- Then the intermediate Cu 2 S, which is more
posed into the following half-cell reactions: amenable to leaching than chalcopyrite, is oxidized
by ferric ions as follows:
CuFeS 2 s Cu2qq Fe 2qq 2S q 4ey Ž 10 . 2Cu 2 S q 8Fe 3qs 4Cu2qq S q 8Fe 2q Ž 13 .
3q y 2q
4Fe q 4e s 4Fe Ž 11 . Summing up Eqs. Ž12. and Ž13. gives Eq. Ž4. as
the overall reaction. Even when the concentrations of
According to this model, it may be expected that ferrous or cupric ions are not enough, the overall
copper extraction is suppressed by cupric and ferrous reaction of chalcopyrite leaching is given by Eq. Ž4..
ions because these ions are the products of the In this case, however, Cu 2 S does not form and
anodic and cathodic reactions. The driving force of chalcopyrite is directly oxidized by ferric ions ac-
chalcopyrite leaching in the model is the difference cording to Eqs. Ž10. and Ž11., and copper extraction
between chalcopyrite potential and solution redox rate is slower than that with ferrous and cupric ions.
potential that is determined by the concentration Thermodynamic aspect of the model was discussed
ratio of oxidant ferric ions to reductant ferrous ions, elsewhere w9,11x and it was shown that the criterion
196 N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197

of enhanced copper extraction by ferrous and cupric chalcopyrite concentrate Žmean diameter: 6.6 mm..
ions can be expressed as: During the experiments, potassium perchlorate was
titrated to reproduce the ferric ions consumed by the
Ec ) E ) Eox Ž 14 . chalcopyrite oxidation ŽEq. Ž4.. and to maintain a
constant solution potential. They reported that the
where Ec is the critical potential of Cu 2 S formation leaching rate increased with increasing potential but
and Eox is the oxidation potential of Cu 2 S. At 298 K that it suddenly decreased above a critical potential
and 1 atm, these potentials are given by Žabout 670 mV vs. SHE.. This may be interpreted as
0.75 follows: below the critical potential, intermediate
Ž aCu 2q . Cu 2 S is formed according to the chalcopyrite reduc-
Ec s 0.681 q 0.059log 0.25 Ž 15 .
Ž aFe 2q . tion shown in Eq. Ž12. because the chalcopyrite
concentrate used has a large specific surface area and
0.5
Eox s 0.561 q 0.059log Ž aCu 2q . Ž 16 . high concentrations of extracted cupric ions are pre-
sent in the solutions. In this potential region, the
where a i is the activities of speices i. leaching rate increases with increasing potential, be-
There are several reports of the effect of ferrous cause the concentration of ferric ions, which is need
ions on chalcopyrite oxidation by ferric ions in sulfu- to oxidize Cu 2 S, increases with increasing the poten-
ric acid solution, which apparently show conflicting tial in Kametani’s experimental system. At higher
results. Based on the proposed model, these conflicts potentials, intermediate Cu 2 S does not form and the
are discussed below. result is a decrease in the leaching rate above the
Dutrizac et al. w6x and Hirato et al. w7x reported critical potential.
that ferrous ions suppress chalcopyrite oxidation with In the presence of dissolved oxygen, ferrous ions
ferric ions ŽEq. Ž4... Here leaching experiments were promote chalcopyrite leaching w2–5x. The present
performed with a chalcopyrite crystal mounted in study shows that, even under anaerobic conditions,
resin. In these studies, the amount of extracted cop- chalcopyrite oxidation due to ferric ions is enhanced
per was reported in mole units but the volume of by ferrous ions in the presence of high concentra-
solutions is not detailed, so the concentration of tions of cupric ions. These results indicate that fer-
cupric ions accumulated in solution is not clear. In rous and cupric ions are important in interpreting the
such an experimental system, however, the concen- leaching behavior of chalcopyrite and when trying to
tration of cupric ions accumulated in the solutions establish optimum conditions for copper recovery in
would be low, because the surface area of the chal- dump leaching.
copyrite exposed to solution is small Ž5.8 cm2 in the
experiments by Dutrizac et al. and 0.3–0.5 cm2 in
the experiments by Hirato et al... Following to the 5. Conclusions
proposed model, enhanced copper extraction by fer-
rous ions occurs only when enough cupric ions are This paper investigates the effects of ferrous ions
present, because intermediate Cu 2 S does not form on chalcopyrite oxidation with ferric ions by leach-
without cupric ions. Direct oxidation of chalcopyrite ing experiments in nitrogen. In the presence of high
ŽEq. Ž4.., i.e. the reaction not involving the interme- concentrations of cupric ions, the chalcopyrite oxida-
diate Cu 2 S, is suppressed by ferrous ions, because tion was enhanced by high concentrations of ferrous
ferrous ions are the product of the reaction. There- ions and copper extraction was mainly controlled by
fore, in the Dutrizac et al. w6x and by Hirato et al. w7x the ferrous to ferric ion concentration ratio. When
studies, low cupric ion concentrations would cause a cupric ion concentrations were low, however, ferrous
suppression of copper extraction by ferrous ions. ions suppressed the chalcopyrite oxidation. These
Kametani et al. w8x investigated the effect of solu- results imply that ferrous promoted chalcopyrite
tion potential on the leaching of chalcopyrite concen- leaching is an electrochemical phenomenon where
trate at 323 to 363 K in 1 mol dmy3 sulfuric acid ferrous ions act as reductant and cupric ions play an
solutions containing ferrous and ferric ions using a important role.
N. Hiroyoshi et al.r Hydrometallurgy 60 (2001) 185–197 197

Acknowledgements Tsunekawa, Sigen-to-Sozai ŽJ. Min. Mater. Proc. Inst. Jpn..


114 Ž1998. 795–800.
w4x N. Hiroyoshi, H. Miki, T. Hirajima, M. Tsunekawa, Sigen-
The authors wish to express appreciation for sup-
to-Sozai ŽJ. Min. Mater. Proc. Inst. Jpn.. 115 Ž1999. 172–176.
port of this research by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific w5x N. Hiroyoshi, T. M.Hirota, M. Hirajima, Biotechnol. Bioeng.
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science 64 Ž1999. 478–483.
and Culture, and a Grant from the Arai Science and w6x J.E. Dutrizac, R.C. MacDonald, T.R. Ingraham, Trans. Met-
Technology Foundation. all. Soc. AIME 245 Ž1967. 489–496.
w7x T. Hirato, H. Majima, Y. Awakura, Metall. Trans. B 18B
Ž1987. 489–496.
w8x H. Kametani, A. Aoki, Metall. Trans. B 16B Ž1985. 695–705.
References w9x N. Hiroyoshi, H. Miki, T. Hirajima, M. Tsunekawa, Hy-
drometallurgy 57 Ž2000. 31–38.
w1x R.W. Bartlett, Solution Mining, Gordon and Breach Publish- w10x G.W. Warren, M.E. Wadsworth, S.M. El-Raghy, Metall.
ers, 1992, pp. 76–81. Trans. B 13B Ž1982. 571–579.
w2x N. Hiroyoshi, M. Hirota, T. Hirajima, M. Tsunekawa, Hy- w11x N. Hiroyoshi, H. Miki, T. Hirajima, M. Tsunekawa, Proceed-
drometallurgy 47 Ž1997. 37–45. ings of Annual Meeting of the Mineral and Material Process-
w3x N. Hiroyoshi, H. Maeda, H. Miki, T. Hirajima, M. ing Institute of Japan 2, 1999, pp. 114–115.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi