Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ID: 806007430
language. You should consider a range of issues such as language variation and change,
c
The English spelling system has often been described as chaotic and not reflective of its
phonology. This premise is inaccurate as English is a fairly phonemic language with its spelling
being bound by morphophonemic rules with some irregularities in its spelling convention. The
irregularities stem from historical change, language variation, folk etymology, eye dialect and
spelling pronunciations.
A phonemic spelling system is one in which each sound has a single accompanying
orthographic symbol or letter. In English a single phoneme has several spellings. For example,
/p/ can be spelt as <p>, <pp>, <ph> or <gh>. However, the most common spelling of most
phonemes is usually a single letter. For example Carney states that 83.5 % of the spelling of /f/ is
<f> (Katamba, 201). Many spelling conventions are bound by phonological replacement rules,
thereby making English spelling rule governed. One such rule is voicing assimilation. This rule
states that voiced segments become voiceless in front of voiceless segments (Stockwell and
Minkova, 99). This means that [Îå, [ å and [å become [å, [å and [å respectively when
occurring before [å e.g. ï ï . A clear example of how morphology affects spelling is
seen in labial assimilation. This rule states that when [*å occurs at the end of a morpheme and
before [ * å it changes to [å e.g. @ . The exception to this rule is when the
morpheme - means µnot¶ e.g. Another replacement rule that affects spelling is T-
Lenition. This is when [å occurs before vocalic suffixes that either give the meaning of a noun
English indicates vowel length. A short vowel is indicated by consonant doubling when the
c
doubling e.g. ï. Vowel length can also be indicated by <e> at the end of a word. Its
presence shows either a long vowel as in or a diphthong. Consonant doubling also indicates
stress. If a disyllabic word has a stress on the second syllable consonant doubling occurs with the
Historical incidents have led to many spelling conventions that may not appear
phonemic. The period of the English language¶s codification and standardisation occurred with
the advent of the printing press. The presence of the ³silent /g/´ in words like ï @ is a result of
historical occurrence rather than phonology. Claxton¶s printing press used Dutch plates which
has /gh/ for /g/, which occurs in Dutch. This is how the convention was introduced in English
with some words retaining the digraph while others did not. Other spelling conventions that do
not match English phonology were introduced after the Norman conquest of Britain. The French
scribes that came institutes French spellings for similar sounds in English. For example /kw/ was
replaced by /qu/ as in
This shows that many spellings reflect the language¶s history and
changes in phonology are rarely reflected in spelling. An example is /gh/ representing /x/ in .
This is partly due to the popular belief in the supremacy of the written word. Writing is viewed
as official and timeless, hence it if far more conservative. An example of the conservative nature
of English spelling can be seen in the Great Vowel Shift. During this period of linguistic change
the phoneme /u/ underwent the following change: ' '' '
' '' '. Despite the change, the
phoneme is spelt /ou/. The changes that occurred during the Great Vowel Shift made the spelling
of English vowels in particular difficult. The Roman alphabet contains of five letters to represent
c
The existence of spelling pronunciations is another reason why English phonology is not
always reflected in its spelling. This is when a word¶s pronunciation is changed to bring it in line
with its spelling. It occurs frequently in words not used in daily speech and unfamiliar proper
nouns (Algeo and Pyles, 54). Examples of this phenomenon can be seen in words like
where the initial /h/ is now pronounced. Spelling pronunciations occur in many French
loanwords, for example ïand . In these words, [`å in the first syllable has moved to [ å.
It can also be seen in the pronunciation of /t/ in . The word forehead is now pronounced
is changed to suit its pronunciation. An example is the Italian loanword which had its
a familiar but incorrect etymology. Early English scribes attempted to orthographically indicate
the origin of a word in the English language (Fromkin, Rodman and Hyams, 565). With this,
came the addition of many µsilent letters¶ to show a Greek or Latin origin e.g. <b> in and
<p> in
. This can be described as an etymological respelling as a result of analogy of
Eye dialect is the indication that a word is non standard by its spelling e.g. @ being
spelt Eye dialect indicates whether a speaker speaks a non-standard form of English but
does not indicate a non-standard pronunciation. Eye dialect provides many alternative spelling,
in some cases a more phonemic one. The eye dialect spelling has become the choice in some
The English spelling has a close relationship with its pronunciation. Morphophonemic
rules ensure that most spelling follow a regular pattern. However when divergence from
c
phonology occurs there are reasonable explanations. English¶s history, spelling not relecting
language variation and the emergence of spelling pronunciations account for many
Works Cited
c