Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
WITH
WITH
WITH
WITH
Lokhandwala Idnfrastructure
Pvt.Ltd. .. Petitioner
Versus
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
and Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WITH
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WITH
WITH
Rs.12.5 Crores.
up in this Court.
functioning?
our purpose:-
is to say:-
(h) preservation,
conservation and development of
area of natural scenery and
landscape;
for them.
28
this Chapter.
photo-pass;
29
accommodation.
Government.
developers/builders.
36
be 1.00.
or access.
January 1995.
summarised hereinbelow.
8 S.C.C. 200]
a slum area.
Rehabilitation Scheme.
appropriate orders.
regard to the same are set out under the Slum Act
light of,
Regulations.
1971.
exhausted.
Constitution of India.
S.R.A.
India.
petition.
226.
Authority.
exercised.
78
be laid down.
Constitution of India.
observes thus:-
appropriate relief."
Constitution......"
Supreme Court.
observed thus:-
the Constitution."
observed thus:-
to writ jurisdiction.
is that :-
exercise them.
statutory remedy.
evidence.
incurred.
implication.
raised grievances.
follows:-
observed:-
reads as follows:-
34 to 46.
conclusion.
scheme.
litigation.
accepted principles.
Authorities.
Gr.Mumbai.
above remedy.
opinion at all.
rehabilitation scheme.
behalf.
Rehabilitation Authority/Public
above.
131
representations/applications despite
or Arbitration.
valuable assistance.
(Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)