Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Twenty-five years ago, when companies like W.L. Gore, Volvo, and General
Foods introduced teams into their production processes, it made news because
no one else was doing it. Today, it’s just the opposite. It‘s the organization that
doesn’t use teams that has become newsworthy. Currently, 80 percent of
Fortune 500 companies have half or more of their employees on teams. And 68
percent of small U.S manufactures are using teams in their production area.
DEFINITIONS OF TEAM
1
Stephen Robbins describes a work team as “a group whose individual efforts
results in a performance that is greater than the sum of those individual inputs”.
The important characteristic of a team are:
• A team consists of few peoples as the interaction and influence processes
needed for the team to function can occur only when the number is small.
• A team includes people with a mix of skills appropriate to the tasks to be
done.
• A team comes together to take action to pursue a goal. The purpose
becomes the focus of the team, which makes all decisions in pursuit of the
goal.
• Mutual accountability is a kind of promise that members make to each
other to do everything possible to achieve their goals, and it requires
commitment and trust of all members.
There are several important distinctions between teams and work groups.
There are as follows:
Performance.
Accountability.
Commitment.
2
Connection to management.
Performance : In work groups, performance depends on the work of
individual members. On the other hand, the performance of a team
depends on both individual contribution and collective work products. That
is the point outcome of members working individually and collectively.
Accountability : In a team the focus is on individual accountability as well
as mutual accountability. The team works together to produce an outcome
and each team member is responsible for that outcome. Rewards are
shared in a team. In a group, members do not consider themselves
responsible for any result other than their own. Although members pool
their resources together to attain the goal, it is individual performance that
is taken in to account while giving rewards.
Commitment : In a group, members share a common interest goal. Team
members not only have common goal but they also have a common
commitment to the purpose.
Connection to management : Team differ from work groups with regard to
the nature of their connections to management. Teams usually have
greater autonomy than groups. Work group have to respond regularly to
the demands placed on them by the management. In contrast work team
have greater flexibility and less interference from the management.
TYPES OF TEAM
3
2) Problem solving teams or improvement teams: Some teams are concerned
with ways of improving quality, efficiency, and the work environment. Such
teams are referred to as problem – solving teams or improvement teams.
Their mission is to increase the effectiveness of the processes that are used
by the organization.
In problem-solving teams, members share ideas or offer
suggestions on how work processes and methods can be improved. Rarely,
however, are these teams given the authority to unilaterally implement any
of their suggested actions.
A problem-solving team usually consists of 8 to 10 employees and
supervisors who meet regularly to discuss quality
problems, investigate causes of the problems, recommend solutions, and
take corrective actions.
These work teams and problem-solving teams or improvement teams
are differ from each other with regard to their purpose or mission.
3) Temporary teams: Some teams are established for a specific project and for
a specific time only. They are disbanded once the job is done. Teams of
such kinds are known as temporary teams.
4
leader’s orders. Such teams are becoming increasingly less popular in
organizations today.
7) Intact teams: In some teams, people operate within a certain area only and
do not move away from their area of expertise. Such teams are known as
intact teams.
8) Cross-functional teams : Cross-functional teams have employees
from about the same level but from different work areas, who come together
to accomplish a task. Such teams are composed of people from different
specialty areas with the organization.
Custom Research’s reorganization illustrates the use of cross-functional
teams. These teams are made up of employees from about the same
hierarchical level, but from different work areas, who come together to
accomplish a task.
Many organizations have used horizontal, boundary-spanning groups for
decades. For example, IBM created a large task force in the 1960s – to
5
develop its highly successful system 360. And a task force is really nothing
other than a temporary cross-functional team.
6
Hackman has proposed a model which provides useful guidelines on how to
design work teams. This model suggest that the process involves four distinct
stages. Keep in mid two caveats before we proceed. First, team differ in form and
structure. Since the model we presents attempt to generalize across all varieties
of teams, we need to be careful not to rigidly apply the model’s predictions to all
the teams. The model should be used as a guide, not as an inflexible
prescription. Second the model assumes that it’s already been determined that
teamwork is preferable over individual work. Creating effective teams in situation
in which individuals can do he job better is equivalent to solving the wrong
problem perfectly. Now let us see the four stages :
7
is expected from them. What is their area of responsibility and what they
are supposed to do.
4) Provide ongoing assistance: The manager should provide whatever
support and assistance the team need. Although he need not directly
intervene in its routine functioning, he can support the team by removing
any obstacles that the team encounters such as replacing uncooperative
members, ensuring regular supply of material resources and so on. Such
ongoing assistance will help the team to perform even better.
8
3) Reward : The reward system should be redesigned to encourage
employees to work as team players. For instance, Hallmark Cards,
Inc; added an annual bonus based on achievement of team goals to its
basic individual incentive system. Promotion, pay raise, and other
forms of recognition should be given to individuals for how effective
they are as a collaborative team member. This doesn’t mean individual
contributions are ignored; rather, they are balanced with selfless
contribution to the team. Lastly, don’t forget the intrinsic reward that
employees can receive from teamwork in the form of opportunities for
developing friendship, helping teammates, being a member of a
successful team and the satisfaction of personal development.
9
2.Cooperation is superior to individualistic efforts in promoting
achievement and productivity.
3.Cooperation without intergroup competition promotes higher
achievement and productivity than cooperation with intergroup
competition.
10
COHESIVENESS : Cohesiveness is a process by which a sense of “we
ness” makes people forget individual differences. Members of a cohesive
group stick together. On the basis of these two reasons, sociologists have
identified two types of cohesiveness. There are socio-emotional
cohesiveness and instrumental cohesiveness.
Socio-emotional cohesiveness is a sense of togetherness that develops
when individual derive emotional satisfaction from group participation.
Instrumental cohesiveness is a sense of togetherness based on mutual
dependency needed for getting the job done. Supports of team-based
work assume that both types of cohesiveness are essential to productive
teamwork.
Instrumental cohesiveness.
1) Regularly update and clarify the team’s goal.
2) Give every team member a vital “piece of action”.
3) Channel each team member’s special talents towards the common
goal.
4) Recognize and reinforce every member’s contribution.
5) Frequently remind team members that they need each other to get the
job done.
11
SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL TEAMS
Considerable research work has been done to determined why some teams
succeed while others fails. Although researchers have not been able to come to
any conclusive findings, it has been found that a wide variety of factors play an
important role in determining whether a team succeed of fails.
According to Newstrom and Davis, the following ingredients are essential for a
team to succeed:
1) Supportive environment : A supportive management is essential for a
team to flourish. The management can develop a supportive environment
by :
a. Encouraging member to think like a team.
b. Proving adequate time for meetings.
c. Demonstrating faith in the team members capacity to achieve.
Such an environment boosts the morale of the team and motivates them to
perform better.
2) Skill and role capacity : Team members must have clear and proper
understanding about their team members. They should know what exactly
they and their team mates are supposed to in order to attain the team
goals. Such clarity lets a team member act immediately without waiting for
instructions.
3) Super-ordinate goals : It is desirable for the manager to create super
ordinate goals. A super ordinate goal is a higher goal that integrates the
efforts of two or more persons. Super ordinate goals helps the team to
focus its unity efforts and become more cohesive. It also helps to resolve
internal conflicts.
12
4) Team rewards : Rewards that are valued by the team members and which
are dependent on the group’s task performance encourage, teamwork and
contribute to the success of the team. Reward may be financial or they
could be in the form of recognition.
Team do not always succeed, they sometimes fail. Some of the factors that
serve as obstacles to a team’s success are:
1) Lack of co-operation : Team fail when members are unwilling to co-
operate with each other. This happens when members do not share a
common vision and re not committed to attaining it.
2) Lack of management support : Team often fail when they do not receive
adequate support from the top management. If the teams mission or
project is not a priority with the management, or if the management does
not provide the team with required resources then the chances of the team
succeeding are dim.
3) Unwillingness of managers to give up control : Managers are used to
giving orders and having them followed. However in team managers have
to build consensus and allow team members to make decisions.
Managers often find hard to let go their control resulting in conflicts with
their team mates.
4) Failure to co-operate with other teams : Although teams may have their
specific objective. It must ultimately contribute to the attainment of the
organization’s goals. When the different teams in the organization do not
co-operates with each other, the organization will not reap the benefits
due to it from the creation of teams.
We have examined the various factors that contribute to the success or failure
of a team. If a team is to yield high performance then it should be properly cared
13
and maintained. Greenberg and Baron have identified several vital elements that
a manager needs to pay attention to in order to build high performance teams:
1) Small size: Good teams are usually small teams. A team should not have
more people than required. The ideal number is 10 to 12.
If the number is too small then team members feel over burdened. However if
the number is too big then coordination among members becomes difficult. They
have difficulty agreeing and the feeling of oneness does not develop. The
commitment and mutual accountability essential for high performance is absent.
2) Members with diverse skills: It is vital that a team has the right mix of
members. It must have members with diverse skills and experiences. It needs
members with three different types of skills:
a) Technical expertise
b) Problem-solving and decision-making skills
c) Interpersonal skills
If a team does not have members who possess the three skills then it is
difficult for it attain a high level of performance.
3) Proper selection: As far as possible only those individuals who like working in
teams must be selected. Individuals who are loners must not be selected. Team
members must be selected on the basis of the skills they possess to accomplish
the task.
4) Training: team members need to be given trained in skills that they are lacking
in. training in technical skills, interpersonal skills, decision making and problem
solving skills may be given to the team members to develop them in to high
performance teams.
5) Proper role allocation: The manager must attempt to understand the strengths
and weakness of each team member and allocate them roles that fit the team’s
requirements as well as the individual’s preference.
14
6) Goal clarity: The team goals must be clearly stated. It must be specific and
realistic so that all the team members can put their efforts in the same direction.
10) Creating team spirit: Team members must be supportive of each other and
they must also have the backing of the top management. Everything should be
done to create a positive and ‘can do’ attitude among the team members.
12) Urgency: Certain amount urgency about the task must be created in teams
as it challenges and pushes them to deliver a high caliber performance.
13) Clarify rule behaviour: It must be clearly stated to the team what standards of
behaviors are expected from them. Ambiguity of any kind must be totally
avoided.
15
14) Confront teams with new facts: Teams should be regularly provided with new
facts and information that will encourage innovation. New developments
challenge teams and charge them up.
15) Acknowledge and reward contribution to the team: Besides linking rewards to
the team performance, spectacular contribution of individuals to the success of
the team should be acknowledged and rewarded.
16) Develop mutual trust: Members of high performance teams have a high level
of mutual trust. However trust takes a long time to built and is easily destroyed.
Managers must ensures that any misunderstanding among team members is
quickly sorted out.
16
BIBLIOGRAPHY
17