Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
11 The East Coast Expressway (Phase 2) is 190km long and when completed, will connect Jabur Interchange to
12 Kuala Terengganu. Ground treatment works were instituted where the highway passes through swampy ground
13 and soft alluvial, in particular where high fill embankments were constructed. The objectives are to ensure
14 embankment stability and restrict settlements to within acceptable limits. Several types of ground improvement
15 techniques were implemented such as vertical drains and surcharging; vibro sand and stone columns and
16 dynamic replacement. Typically, treatment depth ranged from 4 to 16m depth. This paper describes the design
17 and construction of the ground improvement methods including quality control measures and insitu tests. The
18 embankments were instrumented and monitored during construction to ensure performance was according to
19 design requirements.
20 Keywords: embankment; soft ground; ground improvement; prefabricated vertical drain; vibro stone
21 columns; vibro sand columns; dynamic replacement.
22 1.0 Introduction
23 The East Coast Expressway, Phase 2 (ECE 2) transverses 190 km long from Kuantan to
24 Kuala Terengganu. It complements Phase I of East Coast Expressway (ECE 1) which
25 connects Karak to Kuantan. When completed in 2011, it is expected to act as a catalyst to
26 stimulate the economic growth of east coast of Peninsular Malaysia, particularly the state
27 of Terengganu.
28
29 The ECE 2 was designed as a four-lane dual carriageway with an average width of about
30 32m. The finished level was required to be higher than the flood level of 100 year return
31 period as the east coast of Malaysia is often inundated by flood during the annual
32 monsoon season.
33
34 The structures of ECE 2 comprise of bridges, culverts, elevated structures, fill
35 embankments and cut slopes. For the areas where fill embankments crosses swampy
36 ground and soft alluvial sediments, various ground improvement techniques were
37 employed to ensure embankment stability and restrict post-construction settlements to
38 within acceptable limits.
1 The ECE 2 project was demarcated into 12 separate sub-packages under distinct work
2 contracts. This paper presents the application of various ground improvement techniques,
3 namely (i) Prefabricated Vertical Drain, (ii) Vibro Sand Column, (iii) Vibro Stone
4 Column and (iv) Dynamic Replacement in 6 packages (2, 3, 9, 10, 11 &12). The design
5 and construction of each ground improvement technique are described including relevant
6 quality control procedures and insitu tests. The performance of various ground
7 improvement techniques is explained from ground movement monitoring data.
8 Figure 1. Typical cross section for Vibro Stone Column (left) and Dynamic Replacement Column (right).
9 Figure 2. “Dry” Vibro Stone Column Rig Figure 3. Dynamic Replacement Rig
10 6.0 Execution
20
21 Figure 4. Schematic granular column formed by dynamic replacement method
1
Tip Resistance Qc [MPa]
Tip Resistance Qc [MPa]
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
2 0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
0.0
0.5 0.5 Post-treatment CPT
1.0 1.0
0m, 0.5m & 1m from
3 Pre-treatment the centre of column
1.5
Post-treatment 1.5
2.0 2.0
4 2.5 2.5
3.0 3.0
3.5
D e p th [M ]
3.5
5 4.0
Depth [M]
4.0
Remoulded 4.5 Post-treatment CPT
4.5
Zone 5.0 Remoulded 1.5m from the centre
6 5.5 Zone
5.0 of column
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.5
7 6.5
7.0
7.0
7.5
8.0 7.5
8
8.0
9 5a. Pre and Post treatment CPT indicating 5b. Post treatment CPT from centre of
10 remoulded zone below DR column DR column to prove 2.5 m dia. column
9.0
8.0
7.0
Embankment Heights (m)
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0
-50
-100
-150
Settlement (mm)
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
-500
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
Days
9 8.0 Conclusion
10 Ground improvement techniques applied as foundation for highway projects are widely
11 accepted and are increasing in application in Malaysia. This paper presents the
12 application of ground improvement techniques (i) Prefabricated Vertical Drain (ii) Vibro
13 Sand Column (iii) Vibro Stone Column and (iiii) Dynamic Replacement in ECE 2. The
14 concepts behind each technique are discussed, as well as their respective design
15 methodology, execution, and QA/QC plan. Generally, ground improvement techniques
16 were found to be adequate in supporting high embankments without instability and
17 settlement issues. The selection of suitable method is dependant on factors such as
18 embankment height, soil condition (strength and depth), availability of material and costs.
19 Acknowledgments
20 The authors wish to thank the Public Work Department and Malaysia Highway
21 Authorities for allowing us to participate in this important project. We would also like to
22 acknowledge the management and staff of the Main Contractors and Consultants (MTD
23 Capital Berhad, GPQ-Bukit Puteri JV Sdn Bhd, Tidal Marine Sdn Bhd, TSR Bina Sdn
24 Bhd, Cergas Murni Sdn Bhd, HSSI Integrated Sdn Bhd, Minconsult Sdn Bhd, Terratech
25 Consultants Sdn Bhd and WNA Consultant Sdn Bhd) for their valuable contribution in
26 the implementation of the ground improvement works. Colleagues in Keller who
27 contributed immensely in the design and construction, in particular: Dr. V.R. Raju, Mr.
28 Saw Hong Seik and Mr. Sreenivas are also appreciated.
29 References
30 Priebe, H.J., The Design of Vibro Replacement, Ground Engineering: p.31–37, (1995)
31
32 British Standard: BS EN 14731:2005, Execution of special geotechnical works – Ground treatment
33 by deep vibration., 2005.
34
35 Building Research Establishment, Specifying dynamic compaction. BRE458. Garston, BRE
36 Bookshop, 2003.
37
38 Yee, Y.W. and Raju, V.R., Ground Improvement Using Vibro Replacement (Vibro Stone Columns)
39 – Historical Development, Advancements and Case Histories in Malaysia, 16th Southeast Asian
40 Geotechnical Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2007.