Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=maa. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The American Mathematical Monthly.
http://www.jstor.org
1984] NOTES 641
R =[+1 ?]
whereS is 3 x 3 orthogonal in the standardbasis. Hence R has the same formin the basis
eo, n, V3, v4.This concludestheproofoutline.
The physicalinterpretation of thetheorem is worthnoting:The theoremclaimsthatif L is
linear and satisfies(2) and if R is orientation in the sense that Rll = +1 and
preserving
detS = + 1, thenL is thetransformation of coordinatesfroma rocketto a lab framein which
case n pointsin thedirection ofmotionof therocket.FinallynotethatL maybe decomposedas
L = RA. The readerwillfindthattherelationships amongR, A, R, A haveinterestingcomputa-
tionaldetails.
References
1. Morton Hamermesh,Group Theoryand its Applicationto PhysicalProblems,Addison-Wesley,Reading,
MA, 1964.
2. KennethHoffmanand Ray Kunze, LinearAlgebra,Prentice-Hall, EnglewoodCliffs,NJ,1971.
3. L. Janossy,Theoryof RelativityBased on PhysicalReality,AkademiaiKiado, Budapest,1971.
4. Ian R. Porteous,TopologicalGroups,Van NostrandReinhold,London, 1969.
5. H. P. Robertsonand Thomas W. Noonan, Relativitivy and Cosmology,W. B. Saunders,Philadelphia,1969.
6. E. F. Taylor and J.A. Wheeler,SpacetimePhysics,Freeman,1966.
7. HermannWeyl,The Theoryof Groups and QuantumMechanics,Dover,New York, 1950.
THE JORDAN CURVE THEOREM VIA THE BROUWER FIXED POINT THEOREM
RYuJiMAEHARA
Department
ofMathematics,
University
ofRyukyu,
Okinawa,Japan
We willshowthatthisleads to a contradiction.
By thepreceding
remark(a), R2 - J has at least
one boundedcomponent. Let o be a pointin a boundedcomponent;if U itselfis boundedwe
choose o in U. Let D be a largediskwithcentero suchthatits interior
containsJ. Then the
boundaryS of D is containedin the unboundedcomponentof R2 - J. Since arc A is
homeomorphicto the interval[0,1], the identitymap A -- A has a continuousextension
r: D -* A by the Tietze ExtensionTheorem(see, forexample, [2]). We definea map q: D -' D -
{ o }, accordingas U is boundedor not,by
( ~r(z) forz E=U, z forzeGU,
q(z) (r()for
Z z Uc, or q(z) r(z) forzE Uc
respectively. of thetwoclosedsetsU and Uc liesin A on whichr is the
By (#), theintersection
identitymap. Thus q is well definedand continuous.Note that q(z) = z if z E S. Let
p: D - { o } -> S be thenaturalprojectionand let t: S -- S be the antipodalmap. Then the
compositiont -p q: D -* S c D has no fixedpoint.This contradicts theBrouwerfixedpoint
theorem.
Note thatthepreceding proofimplicitlycontainsa proofthatno arc separatesR2, whichis
oftena lemmato theJordancurvetheorem.
We need anotherlemma for our purpose. Let E(a, b; c, d) denote the rectangularset
{(x,y)la < x < b,c < y S d} in theplane R2, wherea < b and c < d.
LEMMA2. Let h(t) = (h1(t), h2(t)) and v(t) = ( v1(t), V2() ) 1 < t 1) be continuous
paths in E(a, b; c, d) satisfying
(#:$)~ ~~h h( -1) =a, h (1) = b, V2(-l) C, V2(1)= d.
Then the twopaths meet,i.e., h(s) = v(t) for some s, t in [-1,1].
Proof. Supposeh(s) * v(t) forall s, t. Let N(s, t) denotethemaximum-norm
of h(s) - v(t),
i.e.,
N(s, t) = Max( 1hl(s) - vl(t) 1, Ih2(s) - V2( t) I}
Then N(s, t) # 0 forall s, t. We definea continuous
map F fromE(- 1,1; -1,1) intoitselfby
=
/v1(t) -
h1(s) h2(s) -
V2(t)
F(s,t)
Note thattheimageof F is in theboundaryof E(- 1,1; -1,1). To see thatF has no fixedpoint,
assume F(so, to) = (so, to). By the above remark,we have IsoI = 1 or ItoI = 1. Suppose, for
example, so = -1. Then by (#X#), the first coordinate of F(-1, to), (vl(to) -
h1(-1))/N(-1,to), is nonnegative and hence cannot equal so(= -1). Similarly, the other
of IsoI = 1 or ItoI = 1 cannotoccur.Thiscontradicts
possibilities theBrouwerfixedpointtheorem
since E(- 1,1; -1,1) is homeomorphic to a disk.
We are now readyto provetheJordancurvetheorem. By Lemma1, we need onlyshowthat
R2 - J has one and onlyone boundedcomponent. The proofwillconsistof thefollowing three
steps:Establishing thenotationand defininga pointzo in R2 - J; provingthatthecomponentU
containingzo is bounded;and provingthatthereis no boundedcomponent otherthanU.
Since J is compact,thereexistpointsa, b in J suchthatthedistanceIla - bllis thelargest.
We may assume that a = (-1,0) and b = (1,0). Then the rectangular set E(-1,1; -2,2)
containsJ, and itsboundaryF meetsJ at exactlytwopointsa and b. Let n be themiddlepoint
of thetop side of E( -1,1; - 2,2), and s themiddlepointof thebottomside; i.e., n = (0,2) and
s = (0, - 2). The segment ns meetsJ by Lemma2. Let / be they-maximal point(thatmeansthe
point(0,y) withmaximaly) in J n ns. Pointsa and b divideJ intotwoarcs;we denotetheone
containing/ by Jnand the otherby Js. Let m be the y-minimal pointin Jnn ns (possibly,
/= m). Then thesegmentms meetsJs;otherwise, thepathnl + Im + ms (whereIm denotesthe
subarcof Jnwithend points/ and m) couldnotmeetJs,contradicting Lemma2. Let p and q
1984] NOTES 643
FIG. 1