Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Competition over border territory is an important cause of conflict among • MP1: how GF1
countries. A country will claim control over a certain land if it is is linked to
outbreak of
important to its defence and national pride. If one country tries to conflict
extend control by taking over territories which another country
sees as rightfully theirs and hence as a matter of pride, will do • Example and
something to protest, conflict will result. For example, the border line elaboration
between India and China was not clear because most of it lies in the
inaccessible Himalayas. China did not agree to the border line drawn by the
British when they ruled India. When India became independent in 1947,
China and India disputed over Aksai Chin Plateau and the North-East Frontier
Agency (NEFA), the 2 border territories that extends furthest into China and
• Remind marker
so important for China’s defence. China contested India’s presence in these you have
areas, for example when it built a road on the Aksai Chin plateau. The logically linked
Indian government protested but China argued that the border had not been GF1 to outbreak
fixed. However, India protested that China had violated India’s territorial of conflict
rights and that the boundaries had been clearly defined by the British. In
1959, fighting broke out in these regions and in 1962, war broke out
between them. It is a matter of national pride for India not to allow • MP2: how GF2
China to challenge her control over territories that she believes as is linked to
legally hers. Not to defend these territories would threaten India’s outbreak of
conflict
sovereignty as it could invite claims for more territories later.
• Example and
elaboration
Competition over scarce natural resources between countries is
also an important cause of conflict between countries because they
are unevenly distributed. Countries with less may use force to get
more resource. It becomes more important when the resource is
necessary for survival and economic growth; a country may use
force to gain more or to prevent another country from claiming the • Remind marker
that you have
same resource. For example, Iceland and Britain disputed over fishing logically linked
grounds in the 1970s. Iceland did not have many natural resources and GF2 to outbreak
depended on its fishing industry for its survival. Fresh fish and fish products of conflict
make up about 79% of Iceland’s total export. In the early 1970s the supply
of fish around Iceland decreased by a third because fishermen from other
European countries, especially from Britain, were overfishing around Iceland. • MP3: how GF3
is linked to
After failing to get the United Nations to intervene, Iceland extended the
outbreak of
zone of control of its fishing grounds from 50 nautical miles to 200 nautical conflict
miles beyond its shore. Britain did not recognize Iceland’s extended area
and continued fishing there. This resulted in frequent collisions between
Britain’s frigates protecting British fishing trawlers and Iceland’s Coast • Example and
elaboration
Guards. In February 1976, Iceland broke off diplomatic ties with Britain. The
conflict was caused by Iceland’s unilateral action of extending control
over a bigger fishing ground and using its coastguards to physically
prevent British fishing vessels from fishing there. These were all
2
All the reasons are equally likely to cause conflict as they are
related to national interests and all countries want to protect their MP4 (WEIGH)
national interests. Control over scarce resources is in a country’s national
Elaboration to
interest if it is important to a country’s economic survival as in the case of support MP4
fish for Iceland. Control of border territories is important for both India and
China’s national interest as they have to do with national pride and defence.
Even political ideology is related to national interest. For example, the USSR
believed that it was in its national interest to surround itself with as many
communist countries as possible. This explains why it set up a communist
government in N Korea. It also explains why North Korea attacked S Korea
and also why China helped N Korea to push the US-led troops back. Similarly
it also explains why the US and the Western allies intervened to prevent the
communist take-over of S Korea. Both sides felt that the ideology of the
other side was a threat to their national interest because it would drastically MP5 (WEIGH)
change their way of life. No matter what the factor is, as long as it is related
to national interests, it will cause conflict to break out between countries Elaboration to
support MP5
because all countries will want to protect their national interests.
3
Whether or not these factors will result in war depends on how each
country manages the conflict. Any one of these factors can lead to war.
And any one of these factors can be easy or difficult to solve, depending on
how the countries manage the conflict. The border conflict between India
and China led to war when China refused to go to the negotiating table and
took unilateral action to establish its claims; the war ended quickly because
both sides decided to discuss the issue peacefully but the territorial conflict
remains unresolved until today. In the case of Britain vs Iceland, it did not
lead to war but there were clashes between Iceland’s coastguards and
British frigates accompanying British fishing boats. The conflict was resolved
because there was compromise and accommodation by both sides when
they signed an agreement in 1976. Thus a war was averted. Similarly, the
conflict caused by different ideological systems also need not necessarily
lead to war because although the real rivalry was between the USA and the
USSR, there was no actual war between these two superpowers. Most
possibly it was because of the geographical distance between them.
However, when they ‘sponsored’ two opposite sides in the same country –
e.g. in Korea, war because of different ideology became more likely, not only
because Korea used to be one country but because the two sides are
geographical neighbours separated by an imaginary line, the 38th parallel.
The conflict started in 1947, but the Korean War started in 1950 because of
North Korea’s act of aggression when it attacked South Korea.
4
would prevent conflicts from worsening and triggering wars that Remind marker
can affect Singapore directly or indirectly. E.g. one of ASEAN’s what you have
aims is to provide opportunities for member countries to discuss linked logically
and resolve differences peacefully. This aim has helped countries
in the region to solve many of the disputes that affected the
region before the formation of ASEAN. Because of this, the region
became politically stable, economically vibrant and thus attracted
foreign investors. By being a member of the UN, Singapore is
better able to manage conflict because it has several organs and
mechanisms such as the Security Council, the General Assembly
and the International Court of Justice [ICJ] that focus on ensuring
world peace and security. The ICJ has helped Singapore and
Malaysia to settle their dispute over the water agreements and
land reclamation peacefully. Because of this, although there were
disagreements, Singapore’s friendly tie with Malaysia was still
maintained. Thus diplomacy is effective in managing
conflict for many countries including Singapore because
there is an underlying understanding that differences can
be settled peacefully when you are friends or when you are
part of the same organisation. Bilaterally, there is the
diplomat whose job is to ensure understanding between
the two countries. In both ASEAN and the UN, settling
disputes peacefully is embodied as one of the main aims of
these organizations.
the affected parties with disputes readily agree to have the UN as their Clincher –
neutral arbitrator and to accept the decisions made. If there was no UN remind
then there will not be any other organisation that is acceptable to both the marker what
parties. Thus, international diplomacy through the UN has you have
contributed to peace and stability by ensuring that conflicts do not proven
escalate into unmanageable proportions and are solved through
international diplomacy rather than force and violence.
However, bilateral diplomacy is also important to the the peace MP2: Explain
and stability in SEA. Bilateral diplomacy ensures that there are strong how AF1 also
friendships and bonds that promote greater cooperation among countries contributes to
in the region and enable them to reap mutual benefits. Such strong QF
bilateral ties have been instrumental in forming new economic, cultural and
humanitarian partnerships. For example, Singapore is constantly seeking Elaboration
ways to improve trade ties with her neighbours, and to maintain close and examples
cultural and social exchanges with Malaysia. Singapore is also ready to
assist in humanitarian missions to any country in the world, especially in
SEA. When there was an earthquake in 1990 in the Philippines, Singapore
sent a medical team to assist in humanitarian and medical aid to the
affected people. Besides that, because of her good bilateral ties with
Indonesia, Singapore has also extended massive help to that country
during times of natural disaster and calamities. During the 1998 Indonesian
economic crisis and the earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2004, Clincher –
Singapore played an active role in providing technical and humanitarian remind
assistance. The emphasis on forming strong bilateral friendships marker what
with countries in the region has produced win-win solutions, you have
enhanced trade ties, and deepened understanding. Most proven
importantly, one benefit is that it becomes unthinkable for two
neighbours with such close ties to ever threaten one another’s
peace and stability. Hence, the peace and stability in SEA is also
due to the close bilateral ties that the countries in the region have
with one another.
Regional diplomacy also plays an important role in ensuring the MP3: Explain
peace and stability in Southeast Asia. An important organisation that how AF2 also
ensures close co-operation and stability of the countries within the region is contributes to
ASEAN. ARF or ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) meets regularly to provide QF
occasions for ASEAN heads of state to discuss security issues and
confidence-building measures with other dialogue partners like the USA, Elaboration
China, Japan, South Korea and India. These dialogues help to ensure that and examples
member states are willing to discuss and negotiate to come to a peaceful
solution to problems rather than use force. Thus this actively helps to
promote peace and security in SEA. E.g. The Spratley island dispute and
the Litigan and Sipidan island dispute among member countries have not
been escalated to higher degrees mainly because of regional diplomacy.
Member states have pledged to solve such territorial disputes through
negotiation and discussion rather than the use of force. ASEAN members
are also cooperating economically to form a free trade zone known as
AFTA. This is to combine forces economically so as to cope with the Clincher –
economic challenges from China and India. Thus regional diplomacy remind
through ASEAN has promoted understanding and cooperation marker what
among member states and has contributed strongly to a climate of you have
peace and harmony. The effectiveness of regional diplomacy has proven
greatly aided disputing nations to resort to peaceful measures to
10
Having a citizen armed force is an important way for Singapore to MP1: GF1
prevent potential aggressors. All able-bodied male citizens in
Singapore serve 2-years of full time National Service. They are trained to Elaborate
defend the country militarily and the common experience they undergo
bond them and instils in them with a sense of loyalty, patriotism and a
shared destiny for Singapore. They serve for another 10 years as Link to QF
Operationally Ready NS men when they attend refresher courses to – show
ensure their competence in handling new weapons and new war tactics. impact
This factor is important because it ensures that Singapore is
militarily self-reliant and ready to defend its independence and
survival by land, air or sea. It also ensures that Singapore has a
large supply of well-trained and patriotic soldiers who are ready
to defend Singapore at all times despite Singapore’s small
population. A potential aggressor will know that Singapore has
the capacity to respond with all its might and an attacker will
suffer high casualties and would probably even fail in its battle
against Singapore. It will think twice about attacking Singapore.
Thus a citizen armed force deters aggressors and safeguards
Singapore’s national security.
However, total defence is also important for Singapore to deter MP2: GF2
potential aggressors. Total Defence involves the whole population in a
comprehensive and integrated defence strategy to deal with all kinds of Elaborate
threats and challenges. It is about different things that people can do in
every sector of the society to strengthen their resilience as a nation.
Collectively the 5 aspects of Total Defence ensure that the military is
operationally ready to meet all challenges, that ordinary citizens are
vigilant and alert, and know what to do during emergencies, that
Singapore has a strong economy that will not break down during any Link to QF
crisis, that Singaporeans of all races and religions live and work – show
harmoniously, and citizens are loyal and committed to Singapore, and impact
that they have the will and mental strength to overcome challenges.
Total Defence is important because potential aggressors will
think twice about attacking Singapore if they know they face the
entire nation and not just the armed forces. The enemy will
realise that attacking Singapore would be a difficult and costly
attempt which should be avoided.
11
The intervention of the USA did not worsen the Korean ONE SIDE:
War. By sending troops to defend South Korea, the US, its allies, Do not
and the UN Security Council prevented the North Korean troops agree
from taking over the whole of South Korea. They recaptured the
Elaborate
territories in South Korea that were overrun by the North Korean
troops and thus saved South Korea from communism. If the US
had not intervened, the conflict would have worsened because the
South would have been badly defeated by the militarily stronger
North. The North would have gotten away with forcefully taking Explain
over a country by carrying out military aggression and worse still,
the people of South Korea would have been forced to live under a
system of government that they do not support. The rest of the
13
region would have been their next target or would have felt Clincher –
threatened by such a violent communist takeover. The USA and show how
its allies would not have allowed this to happen. A third world war explanation
could have broken out. The outcome would have been worst is linked to
QF
without the US intervention. Therefore, by militarily
preventing the South from being forcefully taken over, US
intervention did not worsen the conflict, but instead
averted a more major war involving the whole region.
However, what the USA did after that worsened the OTHER
conflict. After driving the N Korean troops up the 38th parallel, SIDE:
the US-led UN troops, despite China’s warnings, continued to Agree
invade North Korea and reached as far north as the Yalu River near Elaborate
China. Feeling threatened, China moved its troops into North
Korea. The Chinese army then pushed the US-led troops back into
South Korea and more fighting took place in South Korea. US and
UN troops counter-attacked and drove the Chinese troops back to Explain
the 38th parallel. In carrying on fighting beyond the 38th parallel,
the US intervention did worsen the conflict. When they first Clincher –
entered the war, it was justified as they were defending S show how
Korea. However, when they went on the offensive and explanation
attacked N Korea, the US was responsible for worsening is linked to
the hostility as they were threatening the sovereignty and QF
political ideology of N Korea. This worsened the conflict as
the conflict became prolonged.
until today.