Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Tolerant Individual
Debra B. Gordon, RN, MS, FAAN
January 4, 2011 — The contaminated hands of anesthesia providers are a significant source of
patient environmental and stopcock set contamination in the operating room, according to the
results of a study by Randy W. Loftus, MD, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in
Lebanon, New Hampshire, and colleagues, reported in the January 2011 issue of Anesthesia &
Analgesia.
"As anesthesiologists, we like to think that the surgical drapes protect the patient from tens of
trillions of microorganisms that are in and on our bodies," said editor-in-chief of Anesthesia &
Analgesia Steven L. Shafer, from Columbia University in New York, NY, in a news release.
"Nope! These studies provide evidence that our bacterial flora contribute to surgical site
infections."
The hypothesis tested by this study was that bacterial contamination of anesthesia provider hands
before patient contact is a risk factor for direct intraoperative bacterial transmission. At
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, a tertiary care and level 1 trauma center with 400
inpatient beds and 28 operating suites, the first and second operative cases in each of 92
operating rooms were randomly selected for analysis. After exclusion of 10 pairs of cases
because of broken or missing sampling protocol and lost samples, 82 paired samples were
analyzed.
Using a previously validated protocol, the investigators identified cases of intraoperative
bacterial transmission to the patient IV stopcock set and the anesthesia environment (adjustable
pressure-limiting valve and agent dial) in each pair of operating rooms. Biotype analysis allowed
comparison of these identified organisms to those isolated from the hands of anesthesia
providers, which were cultured before each case began. When the same biotype of potential
pathogen was isolated from the patient stopcock set or environment and from the hands of
providers, it was considered to be provider-origin transmission.
By assessing isolated potential pathogens identified at the start of case 2, the investigators also
assessed the efficacy of the current intraoperative cleaning protocol, and they defined poor
intraoperative cleaning as 1 or more potential pathogens found in the anesthesia environment at
the beginning of case 2 that were not there at the start of case 1. To identify risk factors for
contamination, the investigators collected clinical and epidemiologic data on all 164 cases (82
case pairs).
Intraoperative bacterial transmission to the IV stopcock set occurred in 11.5% (19/164) of cases,
of which 47% (9/19) were of provider origin. Intraoperative bacterial transmission to the
anesthesia environment occurred in 89% (146/164) of cases, 12% (17/146) of which were of
provider origin.
Independent predictors of bacterial transmission events not directly linked to providers were the
number of rooms that an attending anesthesiologist supervised simultaneously, the age of the
patient, and patient discharge from the operating room to an intensive care unit (ICU).
Limitations of this study include the potential insensitivity of the methodology; sampling of
hands only in a single time window; lack of sampling of provider hands if prior physical patient
contact had occurred; and provider knowledge of the study, which may have led to exaggerated
hand hygiene compliance and therefore underestimated the significance of provider hand
contamination before patient care.
"Although we know that hand-washing is an important step, our compliance is poor, and there is
little excuse for hospitals not implementing systems that facilitate compliance with hand-
washing guidelines," Dr. Shafer said. "However, as [this report suggests], it is time to look at
additional measures to protect our patients from the biofilm that we take into the operating room
every day."
The study authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Anesth Analg. 2011;112:98-105. Abstract
Related Link
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings Web site
provides patient materials, guideline information, and materials useful in promoting improved
hand hygiene.
Clinical Context
Factors in the intraoperative environment may significantly affect the development of healthcare-
associated infections. An earlier study by this group showed that intraoperative bacterial
transmission to patient intravenous stopcock sets is associated with increased patient mortality
risk.
Preventive measures are needed to improve quality of patient care in this regard, which in turn
requires elucidation of the mechanisms underlying bacterial transmission in the operating room.
The hypothesis tested by the present study was that bacterial contamination of anesthesia
provider hands before patient contact would be an important risk factor underlying bacterial
transmission.
Study Highlights
• The primary goal of the study was to look for direct microbiological evidence
to support the study hypothesis.
• The secondary study goal was to examine the potential role of environmental
decontamination practices in interrupting transmission of organisms in the
operating room.
• The study sample consisted of a random selection of the first and second
operative cases in each of 92 operating rooms at a tertiary care and level 1
trauma center with 400 inpatient beds and 28 operating suites.
• 10 pairs of cases were excluded because of broken or missing sampling
protocol and lost samples, leaving 82 paired samples for analysis.
• The anesthesia environment was defined as the adjustable pressure-limiting
valve and agent dial.
• Cases of intraoperative bacterial transmission to the patient IV stopcock set
and the anesthesia environment in each operating room pair were identified
by use of a previously validated protocol.
• Swabs from the hands of anesthesia providers were used to obtain cultures
before each case began.
• The investigators compared organisms from hands using biotype analysis
with those isolated from the patient stopcock set or environment.
• Provider-origin transmission was defined as isolation of the same biotype of
potential pathogen from the patient stopcock set or environment and from
the hands of providers.
• The researchers determined the effectiveness of the current intraoperative
cleaning protocol by characterizing potential pathogens identified at the start
of case 2.
• Poor intraoperative cleaning was defined as the presence of at least 1
potential pathogen in the anesthesia environment at the beginning of case 2
that was absent at the start of case 1.
• Risk factors for contamination were identified from clinical and epidemiologic
data collected on all 164 cases (82 case pairs).
• There was contamination with potentially pathogenic bacteria on the hands
of anesthesia providers in 66% of cases before surgery began.
• Of 19 cases (11.5%) of intraoperative bacterial transmission to the IV
stopcock set, 9 (47%) were of provider origin.
• Of 146 cases (89%) of intraoperative bacterial transmission to the anesthesia
environment, 17 (12%) were of provider origin.
• Independent predictors of bacterial transmission events not directly
associated with providers were larger number of rooms that an attending
anesthesiologist supervised simultaneously, greater patient age, and patient
discharge from the operating room to the ICU.
• The first case of the day was also associated with a larger magnitude of
overall bacterial transmission, suggesting that use of a surgical scrub, hand
hygiene interventions, or both during this period might reduce the quality
and number of overall contamination events and thereby reduce
postoperative infections.
• Study limitations include the potential insensitivity of the methodology and
possible underestimation of the significance of provider hand contamination
before patient care.
• On the basis of these findings, the investigators concluded that
contamination of provider hands before patient care is an important
modifiable risk factor for bacterial cross-contamination and that organisms
were likely brought to the patient and the environment as providers moved
from room to room with continued lapses in hand decontamination.
• The investigators also noted that compliance with hand-washing is poor and
that hospitals need to implement systems that facilitate compliance with
hand-washing guidelines by anesthesia providers both before and during
patient care, as well as intraoperative decontamination strategies.
• Patient age and patient discharge to the ICU were also independent risk
factors, which may reflect disease severity as well as associated competing
agendas (hand hygiene vs expedited patient care).
Clinical Implications
• The contaminated hands of anesthesia providers significantly contribute to
patient environmental and stopcock set contamination in the operating room.
This represents an important modifiable risk factor for bacterial cross-
contamination and supports initiatives designed to improve intraoperative
hand hygiene of anesthesia providers both before and during patient care.
• Patient age and patient discharge to the ICU were also independent risk
factors for intraoperative bacterial transmission. Additional sources of
intraoperative bacterial transmission, including postoperative environmental
cleaning practices, should be studied further.
CME Test
Top of Form
http://w w w .meds /qna/processor/1 19624 true
According to the study by Loftus and colleagues, which of the following statements
about the role of bacterial contamination of the hands of anesthesia providers in
intraoperative bacterial transmission is not correct?
RADIOBUTTON 0
111753
According to the study by Loftus and colleagues, which of the following is most
likely to be associated with bacterial transmission events not directly associated
with providers?
RADIOBUTTON 0
Bottom of Form