Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
com/tag/applications/page/3/
Home
About
Applications
Principles
Experimental
Copyright
Links
Archive
Like so many aspects of modern photochemistry, Ireland has some key researchers
in ruthenium photochemistry and the article below draws from a recent perspective
by John Kelly (TCD) and Han Vos (DCU). The fundamentals are discussed here
with applications discussed in a forthcoming article.
We have looked elsewhere at Jablonski diagrams for organic molecules. Inorganic molecules,
or more specifically d-block complexes, add an extra layer of molecular orbitals to this
Jablonski diagram, between the ground state (HOMO) of the organic compound (which is now
the ligand) and the excited state (LUMO). This opens up a range of new transitions, aside from
the HOMO-LUMO transition observed in organic chromophores. This latter transition in
inorganic photochemistry is called a ligand-field or ligand-ligand transition, as in the excited
state the electron is located on the ligand. As well as this, because of the presence of the
metal’s molecular orbitals, three other transitions are available – a d-d transition, where an
electron is excited from a metal orbital to an unoccupied metal orbital (this is usually referred to
as a metal centred (MC) transition as well as transitions between the metal and the ligand.
These can be either an electron excited from the ligand to the metal, called Ligand to Metal
Charge Transfer (LMCT) or from the metal to the ligand (MLCT). Because of the energy
differences between the various types of transitions, ligand field transitions are usually in the
near-UV region (analogous to where we would expect organic molecules to absorb light),
charge transfer transitions are in the visible region. The resulting emission from charge-transfer
states is often highly coloured.
In order to discuss these transitions in context, we will focus on the, that is, the, inorganic
photochemistry complex: Ru(II)(bpy)32+.
Because of the incorporation of metal orbitals, the Jablonski diagram needs to incorporate the
notation discussed above. Ruthenium in oxidation state II is d6, and so as an octahedral
complex its electrons are in the low-spin t2g6 configuration. Incident light at about 450 nm
promotes one of these electrons to a ligand anti-bonding orbital, a metal to ligand charge
transfer. (We’ll discuss this, but you might consider how this was established.) Therefore we
modify the S0 – S1 notation used in the Jablonski diagrams of organic molecules to one which
denotes the type of excited state in inorganic ones – in this case 1MLCT. Transfer to 3MLCT is
efficient (heavy atom effect) and so ruthenium complex’s photochemistry generally happens
from here. [Remember intersystem crossing is effectively an electron flip, from a situation
where electrons are paired to one where they are unpaired.]
The absorption and emission data are shown. Ruthenium absorbs at 450 nm (2.8 eV) and
emits strongly at ~620 nm (~2.0 eV) in water. This emission is caused by radiative process from
the 3MLCT state to the ground state. Emission lifetimes are approximately 200 ns in water in
aerated solution and 600 ns in deaerated water. The oxygen in water is a very efficient
quencher, and quenches emission with a rate of ~ 109 M-1 s-1. It is possible to map out the
various deactivation processes of the excited state to investigate its kinetics:
The quantum yield of emission is therefore affected by how efficient the rate of emission is
compared to the rates of deactivation and quenching. This is quantified by the Stern-Volmer
relationship (oxygen quenches according to the dynamic quenching model) as discussed in the
Quenching section, according to the equation below:
The rate constants, in particular the rate constant for deactivation, are dependent on how close
the ground and excited states are. The excited state of this complex is a charge-transfer state
(charge has moved from one region of the molecule to another), and therefore is very sensitive
to solvent polarity – it will be stabilised in more polar solvents. Therefore, changing solvent
polarity will affect the energy of the emitting state. It is found that on changing the solvent from
water to acetonitrile, the emission lifetime increases from 635 ns to 870 ns, and the quantum
yield of emission increases by 50% from 0.o4 to 0.o6. The emission maximum increases in
energy from 627 nm to 615 nm.
These results can be explained as follows: on decreasing polarity of the solvent, the emitting
state is destabilised by about 12 nm. This increase in energy difference between ground and
excited state means that there is poorer overlap of the vibrational levels of the ground and
excited state, so the deactivation process is not as efficient. Therefore the deactivation rate
constant term is lower in the expression for the emission quantum yield in the presence of
quencher, above, indicating a larger emission quantum yield. All of this is based on the
assumption that the radiative rate constant remains unchanged, which is found to be true in
practice. This observation is generally summarised as the Energy Gap Law – the larger the gap
between ground and excited state, the less efficient deactivation processes are.
Absorption and emission spectra give initial information on the excited state, and are the
photochemist’s initial tools to probe the excited state chemistry of molecules. To delve further,
flash photolysis/transient spectroscopy give more detailed information. Flash photolysis, as
mentioned elsewhere on this site, allows us to study the excited state by obtaining its lifetime
and absorption spectrum. An experimental set-up is outlined below (more details onthe general
details of flash photolysis in the Experimental article on Flash Photolysis). Excitation using, for
example a Nd:YAG laser at 355 nm, generates the excited state which quickly equilibrates to
the 3MLCT state. At this stage, a Xe or Hg/Xe obtains an absorption spectrum of the excited
state. This was traditionally acquired point by point (i.e. measuring the change in absorption at
400, then 410, then 420 nm, etc) but iCCD (intensified charge coupled device) detectors are
now the norm – these acquire information across a broad spectral range (~600 nm) at once. As
well as providing structural information on the nature of the excited state by generating its
absorption spectrum, flash photolysis also allows for the lifetime of this state to be measured,
by acquiring a spectrum at intervals after the laser flash, therefore monitoring the decay of the
excited state.
The transient spectrum is shown with the accompanying ground state absorption spectrum. In
the transient spectrum, it can be seen that some peaks have negative changes in absorbance
whereas others have positive changes. The negative changes in absorbance (“bleaching”)
occur where the molecule shows absorbance bands in the ground state. Hence, with a
transient spectrum, the lash flash results in the formation of the excited state, and the xenon
lamp records the loss of ground state chromophores – any absorbance that was present
because of these chromophores is now registered as negative changes in absorbance in the
transient spectrum. On formation of excited/transient state, new chromophores are present,
which are monitored by the xenon lamp, and hence appear as positive changes in absorption
(remember ground and excited states are chemically different species). To generate a true
transient spectrum, the differences in absorption is subtracted from the absorption spectrum,
although this is rarely necessary. The decay curve, in the inset is the rate of decay of one of
the peaks – e.g. the transient peak at 390 nm. Fitting this curve to an exponential function
allows for the rate constant (and hence lifetime) of the transient state to be easily determined.
For example, if the decay was found to be mono-exponential, the curve of intensity (I) versus
time (t) would be fitted to the expressionand allow for calculation of k.
The above experiment discusses results from a nanosecond experiment, but if we were to push
faster, into the picosecond and femtosecond domain, the processes of intersystem crossing
and relaxation in the triplet state would be observed. These kind of experiments are how
information such as charge injection rates in dye-sensitized solar cells can be determined.
The extent of positive absorbances in transient spectroscopy provide information on the nature
of the transient species or excited state. Like conventional UV/vis spectroscopy, broad
featureless bands very often don’t provide much direct information. However, considering the
various types of transitions available, why is the excited state assigned as a MLCT state? This
state, as indicated above, results in an extra electron residing on the bipyridyl (bpy) ligand,
after an electron was transferred from the metal to it. Therefore, the transient spectrum should
show characteristics of this bpy radical (called “bpy dot minus”). How can this be done? Well
with the assistance of our electrochemical friends, we can electrochemically generate the bpy
radical, and obtain its UV/vis spectrum (this technique is called spectroelectrochemistry). If it
has characteristics similar to those in the transient spectrum (which in this case it does, the
band at 368 nm), we can conclude that they must be attributed to the same chromophore.
3. Conclusion
In this first of two articles, we have looked at basic photophysical properties of a ruthenium
complex and examined how absorption, emission and transient spectroscopic studies provide
information on their excited state. In the second article, we will look at how these properties are
used in a variety of applications.
Vos, J. G. and Kelly, J. M., Ruthenium polypyridyl chemistry: from basic research to
applications and back again, Dalton. Trans., 2006, 4869 – 4883. Good ooverview of the
synthesis of these complexes and their variety of applications, especially looking at the role of
Irish researchers in the area
The Photochemistry Portal (photochemistryportal.net) is the new host for this site. You will
find all this content and more at the site!
Recent Posts
Archives
Tags
Top Posts
Blog Stats
18,313 hits
Photochem. Photobiol.
The (5-4) and (6-4) Adducts of 1-Methylthymine and Their Dewar Valence Isomers
Photochemical Reaction Fields with Strong Coupling between a Photon and a Molecule
April 20, 2011
Elaboration of stable anatase TiO2 through activated carbon addition with high
photocatalytic activity under visible light April 17, 2011
Light-assisted nucleation of silver nanowires during polyol synthesis April 17, 2011
Fluorescent and photooptical properties of H-bonded LC composites based on stilbazole
derivative April 17, 2011
Nature Photonics
Administrator
Register
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.com
Top WordPress
Copyright © 2009-2010 The Photochemistry Portal
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: INove by NeoEase.