Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dynamics
Laboratory Report
Dynamics
Nusrath
4/29/2010
Contents
Contents..................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction.......................................................................................................... 3
Background and Theory.......................................................................................3
Apparatus.............................................................................................................4
Experimental procedure.......................................................................................5
Results.................................................................................................................6
Calculations..........................................................................................................7
Discussion............................................................................................................ 9
Conclusion............................................................................................................ 9
References...........................................................................................................9
Introduction
This is the equation that will be used to calculate the frequency from the laboratory experiment.
The natural frequency of free vibration of the assembled system is given by:
f1 =
When a body is simply suspended from a spring, the natural frequency of free vibration is given
by:
f2=
In the bifilar suspension the two light cords of length, L, are separated throughout by 2a. For
small rotary displacement of the suspended body (the pulley), the natural frequency of free
vibration is given by:
f3=
• Light string
• Weighing machine
• Pulley
• Stirrup
• Spring
• Body
Using the balance the masses (m1, m2, m3 and m4) were measured. The smallest
degree of accuracy was 1 gram.
The radius of the pulley was measured from the centre line of the cord.
The apparatus was setup in order to collect data for measuring the spring constant.
The body was setup in order to oscillated up and down (vertically) by hand this was
done by pulley the body down and then releasing the body. Using a stop watch the
time taken for 20 oscillations were recorded from spring release, this was used to
calculate one oscillation (to reduce errors). This procedure was repeated three
times to calculate the average.
The apparatus was shown in figure 1.2. The distance 2a and L were measured,
using a measuring tape. The pulley was twisted and then was released to oscillate
in the horizontal axis. Using a stop watch the time taken for 20 oscillations were
recorded from pulley release, this was used to calculate one oscillation (to reduce
errors). This procedure was repeated three times to calculate the average.
The apparatus was setup as shown in figure 1.1. The body was carefully setup in
order to move vertically up and down oscillation by hand, this was done by pulling
the body down and then releasing. Using a stop watch the time taken for 20
oscillations were recorded from spring release, this was used to calculate one
oscillation (to reduce errors). This procedure was repeated three times to calculate
the average.
Results
k = ? (Find out using equation f2)
m1 = 0.23kg
m2 = 0.055kg
m3 = 0.002kg
m4 = 0.35kg
Ic = ? (Find out using equation f3)
r = 0.075m
a= = 0.0705m
L = 2.13m
Time of 20 oscillations
41.92s
16.73s
f2=
2.6918 =
k = 100.31 N/m
Finding Ic using f 3 :
f3=
0.4772 =
Ic = 5.849 kg m2
f1 =
Substituting the values into f1:
f1 =
f1 = 1.1953 Hz
Error percentage:
Discussion
Conclusion
The experiment successfully met the aim which was to determine the experimental
frequency compared to the theoretical frequency. The experimental frequency was
calculated 1.2058 and the theoretical frequency was 1.1953. It is clearly showing
that the values are close to each other. It was concluded that the theoretical simple
harmonic motion model were idealistic for this experiment (did not take energy loss
and damping effects into account). There were minimal impact errors in the
measurements of length and mass while calculating values of experimental
frequency. The value obtained from the experimental frequency is more accurate
compared to the theoretical frequency as experimental is a real-life situation.
References