Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Bonita Castleberry
Jennifer Edwards
Georgia Southern University
Spring 2011
1
Technology Plan Evaluation
Part 1: Comparison of Dr. Paul Allen’s Rubric from the University of Texas with
Executive Summary 1
Indentifies Contributors and Stakeholders 2
Vision Statement 3
Mission Statement 2
Goals 3
Objectives 3
Needs Assessment 3
General Issues 2
Conclusions and Recommendations 1
Acceptable Use Policy 3
Technology Learning Statement 3
Technology standards, requirements, and 3
2
Part 2: Supporting Documentation
The Technology Plan for Pulaski County was last updated in 2008. It is a three -
year plan that was submitted to and approved by HGRESA and State DOE on June 17,
2008. The plan is currently in its third year. It covers the Elementary School, Middle
School and High School within the district. All three schools in the district are connected
via a fiber optic WAN. The T-1 connections are provided to the school district via the
Georgia DOE. A Citrix network is in place to give students and staff access to software
applications and resources at home or from any Internet connected computer. In 2008, a
server was purchased and installed on the network that is solely dedicated to hosting all
of the content from United Streaming / Discovery Education. This was done to decrease
the strain on the network’s Internet resources. Every classroom in the Pulaski County
School District has a minimum of three Internet – Ready computers for students and
teachers were given the option of a laptop or desktop system for his/her classroom.
budget constraints. To help with the budgets constraints, two Technology Grants have
been written and awarded to the school. These grants allowed for the purchase of Mac
Book laptop computers, Smart Boards, video cameras, digital cameras, projectors, Mp3
players, Dell Laptops and Laptop cart and other various technology resources.
Executive Summary:
In comparing Pulaski County’s Technology Plan to Dr. Paul Allen’s Rubric from
the University of Texas, the Executive Summary was absent and therefore scored a one
3
the county’s technology situation, the reader must read the section Instructional
Technology Use. This section describes the technology each school has within the
system. In order to improve this score, a section entitled Executive Summary would need
to be added that would clearly outline the vision, mission, goals, objectives, backgrounds,
findings, issues, conclusions, and recommendations of the technology plan for Pulaski
County.
When comparing Pulaski County’s Technology Plan to Dr. Paul Allen’s Rubric
from the University of Texas, Pulaski County scored a two out of three in the
Contributors and Stakeholders section. After reading through the section Vision for
Technology Use, the plan does briefly mention the stakeholders as being: students,
members. To improve this portion of the plan, a more defined list of the stakeholders
should be included along with their jobs and contributions to the Technology Plan.
Vision Statement:
Comparing the analysis rubric with Pulaski County’s Technology Plan, Pulaski
scored a three on a three-point scale. Pulaski’s vision for technology use within the
system is comprehensive and deals with student’s use of technology to improve and
enhance learning and not just merely technology usage. The vision statement for the
…to provide state of the art technologies to our students and staff, provide
4
professional learning opportunities to assist teachers in the use of these
technologies to produce maximum student achievement, and to provide support to
ensure the success of these initiatives.
5
monitoring, and other data regarding the students’ academic
standing;
• Create baseline standards for classroom technology and
initiate system wide purchasing policies;
• Provide high performance, web-based software with adequate
training to administrative personnel that will allow easy data
collection and distribution to school personnel;
• Provide current, web-based information to inform the
community of overall student requirements, performance, and
achievement;
• Extend the availability of school technology resources to our
students outside of the classroom;
• Extend the availability of school technology resources to the
community.
The Technology Plan also clearly states the vision for using technology
Some benefits and results from the use of technology by students and
staff that are indicated in Pulaski County’s Technology Plan state that
6
…technology will enable us to prepare our students for future
careers. Our classrooms will be enriched with relief performance tasks,
collaborative planning and completion of assignments by diversified
groups of students…Our classrooms are student centered where the
teacher serves as a coach guiding his/her students through new and
exciting learning experiences through the use of technology.
Mission Statement:
Goals:
7
• Increase the application and use of technology to enhance
job performance and productivity
• Utilize technology to enhance community communication
and provide additional standards based material
Each of these goals direct teachers and administrators in the area of Instructional
Technology. The Technology Plan also does a very good job of identifying who is
responsible for each goal, when the goal is to be implemented/attained, how it will be
Objectives:
Comparing the Analysis Rubric with Pulaski County’s Technology Plan in the
area of objectives, Pulaski scored a three on a three-point scale. The rubric states that
Technology Plan, these steps are clearly identified and realistic. For example, one
objective states that parents will have access to homework, assignments, and assistance
via teacher and standards-based websites. In order to assess this, the Technology
Director and Principal use a Quality Website Rubric as well as Nettrekker Usage Reports.
Needs Assessment:
needs assessment, and Maturity Model Benchmark surveys. Pulaski County scored a
three on a three-point scale. Pulaski County utilizes the following data sources to collect
8
• Annual technology budget which identifies:
o Capital purchases and support expenditures.
o New and alternative funding sources.
General Issues:
Comparing the Analysis Rubric with Pulaski County Technology Plan, Pulaski
scored a 2.8 out of a three-point scale. All of the components were clearly addressed in
9
learning.
Of the eleven components on the Analysis Rubric, only one was not identified. In order
to receive a three out of three, the plan needs to include a section with the National
A review of this technology plan reveals that it scored a one out of three on a
three-point Analysis Rubric scale. This plan does not identify the most important needs
and challenges confronting the school. The school system needs to recommend the
The Pulaski County Technology Plan does include an acceptable use policy thus
scoring a three out of a three-point scale. Acceptable Use Policies are necessary to
ensure proper use of the technology resource. These policies are included in the plan’s
Appendix A outlines the Board Policy in regards to Internet use and safety. The
includes a Student User Contract, Parent Internet Use Permission Slip, and
technology plan clearly provides how technology is used in the learning environment and
10
ways it will be used to achieve instructional outcomes. This plan provides an appendix
County scored a three on a three-point Analysis Rubric scale. A clear and comprehensive
…Pulaski County’s Technology Plan denotes what hardware and software exits at
its schools. Each classroom is equipped with two to five modern computers (laptops or
response system. In addition, wireless access points were installed in all schools, all
switches were replaced with 1GB capacity equipment and several servers were replaced.
A Citrix network is in place to give students and staff access to software applications and
Accelerated Math, STAR Reading, STAR Math, Class Works, Microsoft Excel,
Math, STAR Reading, STAR Math, Class Works, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel,
Photo Story. Hawkinsville High School utilizes Accelerated Reader, Accelerated Math,
11
STAR Reading, STAR Math, Class Works, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft
Publisher, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Movie Maker, Microsoft Photo Story, Page
The Technology Plan for Pulaski County describes the learning environments that
…Pulaski County Elementary School has one computer lab and a mobile lab of
laptop computers. The cart houses 25 machines and is easily moved to any classroom in
the building. The computers are equipped with the Microsoft Office Suite as well as
configured to access the school network and then Internet via a wireless connection.
…Pulaski County Middle School provides three computer labs. One lab is
equipped with 28 computer workstations and is used for instruction of Connections class;
the second lab is equipped with 28 computer workstations used for academic remediation
and enrichment; and the third lab is outfitted with win-terms that connect to the Citrix
network only and is available for a teacher to schedule to bring their classes.
…Hawkinsville High School provides two computer labs used to teach Business
Education classes, one lab used for Computer Assisted Drafting, one lab used in the
Information Technology vocational program, and one general ‘sign up’ lab. The science
department is equipped with digital microscopes and several sets of student response
Technology and Learning, Pulaski County should continue to engage in data driven
decision making as a result of current data being available through the use of technology
12
as well as comparing themselves to other school district technology departments.
Staff Development
opportunities in the area of technology for all Pulaski County personnel. The Heart of
Georgia Educational Technology Training Center also offers classes on a regular basis
and ETTC personnel will go into individual classrooms and assist teachers and students
or model lessons.
The plan does not describe how teachers and other staff will move from present level of
technology competency and knowledge to the level of skill required in the plan. An
assessment should be taken to determine the technology needs of teachers and staff in
Technical Support
support. Technical support provides available services and support technology for
schools within a district. This district’s networks are maintained by the technology
Pulaski County employs one full time Technology Specialist and on half time
work orders. Pulaski County lacks the comprehensive element of the plan. Clear details
13
should be stated in the plan for the requirements and plans need to support network,
Pulaski County scored a three on the Analysis Rubric scale on their technology
plan in the area of projects, budgets, and timelines. A prioritized list of major technology
plan projects with budget summary estimates and funding resources was thoroughly
addressed.
Clarity of Writing
County scored a three on a three-point scale. The plan used concise and clear writing
with not misspelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes evident. Pulaski County should
preserve this means of communication when appraising and updating its technology plan.
Summary
organized format. The use of Dr. Paul Allen’s Technology Planning Analysis Rubric
plan. The technology plan for Pulaski County was enlightening and followed the State of
Georgia mandates for a school technology plan. When comparing the technology plan to
Dr. Allen’s rubric, three components of were found lacking and four components were
found incomplete. The plan should include an Executive Summary, Conclusions and
14
improvement include a revised Table of Content that is more in line with Dr. Paul Allen’s
Technology Planning Analysis Rubric. Out of the six goals established by Pulaski
County, three have been successfully achieved. Completion of the remaining goals
should be realized prior to the expiration date of the technology plan as of June 30, 2011.
Pulaski County has made several major improvements in the area of technology:
Century equipment.
• Expanded use of on-line credit courses via Odyssey and Georgia Virtual
Major budget constraints over the last several years, have prevented the successful
demands, Pulaski County should update their technology plan annually rather than every
three years.
15
References
https://goml.view.usg.edu/webct/urw/lc18395011.tp0/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct
White, R. (2008, July 1). Pulaski county three-year technology plan. Retrieved from
rwhite@pulaski.k12.ga.us
16