Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ANSWERS
TO BAR EXAMINATION
IN
FORWARD
the issues touched by the Philippine Bar Examinations and its trend.
POLITICAL LAW
It is specially intended for law students from the provinces who,
We
goodwould (1987 – 2006)
like to seek the indulgence of the reader for some Bar
karma.
Updated
limited knowledge of the law. We would like to seek the reader’s
by:
Romualdo L. Señeris II, LLB.
indulgence for a lot of typographical errors in this work.
April 19, 2007
The Authors
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
SOVEREIGN RIGHTS — for the purpose of
exploring and exploiting, conserving and
managing the natural resources, whether living or
non-living, of the seabed and subsoil and the
superjacent waters, and with regard to other
activities such as the production of energy from
the water, currents and winds in an area not
extending more than 200 nautical miles beyond
the baseline from which the territorial sea is
measured. (See Art. 56, UNCLOS) Jurisdiction,
inter alia, with regard to:
(1) the establishment and use of artificial
islands, installations and structures;
(2) marine scientific research;
(3)
and the protection and preservation of the
marine environment.
through the territorial sea. (Article 14 of the such
No. as
1; What
low ordo non-existent
you understand taxationby or thelow"Doctrine
Convention on the Law of the Sea.) operating costs although
of Incorporation" the ship has
in Constitutional Law? no genuine
SUGGESTED
link with ANSWER:
that state. (Harris, Cases and
Under Section 1, Article I of the 1987 Constitution, Materials
The on International Law,
DOCTRINE OF 5th ed., 1998, p. 425.) means
INCORPORATION
the INTERNAL WATERS of the Philippines that the rules of International law form part of the
consist of the waters around, between and law of Territory
the land & Government (1996) action is
and no legislative
connecting the islands of the Philippine No. 8: A law
required was passed
to make dividing the
them applicable to Philippines
a country.
Archipelago, regardless of their breadth and into
Thethree regions (Luzon,
Philippines follows Visayas, and Mindanao),
this doctrine, because
dimensions, including the waters in bays, rivers each
Sectionconstituting
2. Articlean II ofindependent
the Constitutionstate states
exceptthat on
and lakes. No right of innocent passage for matters of foreign adopts
the Philippines relations, thenational
generally defense
acceptedand
foreign vessels exists in the case of internal national
principles taxation, which are
of international lawvested
as partinofthe theCentral
law of
waters. (Harris, Cases and Materials on government.
the land. Is the law valid? Explain.
International Law, 5th ed., 1998, p. 407.) Internal
waters are the waters on the landward side of DoctrineSUGGESTED ANSWER:
of Incorporation; Pacta Sunt
baselines from which the breadth of the territorial The law (2000)
Servanda dividing the Philippines into three
sea is calculated. (Brownlie, Principles of Public Noregions,
X. Theeach constituting
Philippines an independent
has become a member state
of
International Law, 4th ed., 1990, p. 120.) and
the vesting
World in a
Trade central government
Organization matters
(WTO) andof
foreign relations,
resultantly agreednationalthat itdefense,
"shall and ensure national
the
taxation, is unconstitutional.
conformity of its laws, regulations and
ARTICLE II Declaration of administrative procedures with its obligations as
First, it violates
provided in the Article
annexed I, which guarantees
Agreements." Thisthe is
Principles and State Policies integrity of the national territory
assailed as unconstitutional because this of the Philippines
because it unduly
undertaking divided limits,
the Philippines
restricts and intoimpairs
three
Armed Forces; Servant of the People (2003) Philippine states. sovereignty and means among others
No I - Article II. Section 3, of the 1987 that Congress could not pass legislation that will
Constitution expresses, in part, that the "Armed Second,
be goodit for violates Section interest
our national 1, Article andII general
of the
Forces of the Philippines is the protector of the Constitution, which provides for the
welfare if such legislation will not conform with the establishment
people and (of) the State." Describe briefly what ofWTOdemocratic
Agreements. and republic
Refute this States by replacing
argument. (5%) it
this provision means. Is the Philippine National with three States organized as a confederation.
Police covered by the same mandate? SUGGESTED ANSWER:
FIRST ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: According to Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18
Article II, Section 3 of the 1987 ConstitutionThird, (1997),it the violates Section of22,theArticle
sovereignty II of the
Philippines is
means that the Armed Forces of the PhilippinesConstitution, subject to restriction by its membership in and
which, while recognizing the
should not serve the interest of the President butpromoting family of nations the rights
and theof limitations
indigenous imposedculturalof
of the people and should not commit abusescommunities, treaty limitations. Section 2. Article II of and
provides for national unity the
against the people. (Record of the Constitutionaldevelopment. Constitution adopts the generally accepted
Commission, Vol. V, p. 133.) This provision isprinciples of international law as part of the law of
specifically addressed to the Armed Forces of theFourth, the land.it One violates Section
of such 15, Article
principles is pactaX of suntthe
Philippines and not to the Philippine NationalConstitution, which, provides
servanda. The Constitution did not envision a for autonomous
Police, because the latter is separate and distinctregions hermit-likein Muslim
isolation Mindanao and infrom
of the country the Cordilleras
the rest of
from the former. (Record of the Constitutionalwithin the
the world. framework of national sovereignty as
Commission, Vol. V, p. 296; Manalo v. Sistoza. 312well as territorial integrity of the Republic of the
SCR A 239 [1999].) Philippines.
Freedom from Nuclear Weapons; Foreign
SECOND ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Military Bases (1988)
Article II, Section 3 of the 1987 Constitution can No. Fifth, it violates
22: The Secretarythe ofsovereignty
Justice hadofrecently
the Republicruled
be interpreted to mean that the Armed Forces that of ofthethePresident
Philippines. may negotiate for a modification
the Philippines can be a legitimate instrument for or extension of military bases agreement with the
the
Flagoverthrow
State vs. of theof
Flag civilian government
Convenience (2004)if it has
Territorial
United Sea vs.
States Internal Waters
regardless of the(2004) "no nukes"
ceased to be the servant of the people. (Bernas,
(2-a-3) Distinguish: The flag state and the flag provisions in the 1987 Constitution.sea
(2-a-1) Distinguish: The territorial Theand the
President
The 1987 Constitution of
of convenience. SUGGESTED ANSWER: FLAG the Philippines: A internalannounced
forthwith waters of the thatPhilippines.
she finds the SUGGESTED
same opinion
Commentary,
STATE means 2003
a shiped.,has the This
p. 66.) provision
nationality of thedoes ANSWER:and
"acceptable" TERRITORIAL
will adopt it.SEA TheisSenators
an adjacent on the
not
flag ofapply to the
the state Philippine
it flies, but there National
must be aPolice, belt hand,
other of sea withled aby breadth of 12 nautical
the Senate President,miles are
because
genuine link it between
is separate and and
the state distinct from the
the ship. measured
skeptical, andfrom hadthe baselines
even warned of that
a state noand overor
treaty
Armed Forces of the Philippines. (Record of the international which the state has sovereignty.
agreement may go into (Articles
effect 2without
and 3
Constitutional Commission, Vol. V, p. 296, Manalo v. of the Convention on the Law of the Sea.) Ship of
(Article 91 of the Convention on the Law of the Sea.) the concurrence of two-thirds of all members of the
Sistoza. 312 SCRA 239 [1999].)
all states enjoy the right of innocent passage
Senate.
FLAG OF CONVENIENCE refers to a state with which a
Doctrine of Incorporation;
vessel is registered Constitutional Law
for various reasons
(1997)
A former senator had said, "it is completely the flag must be recognized by law, it implies
wrong, if not erroneous," and "is an amendment that certain aspects of the flag are subject to
of the Constitution by misinterpretation." Some change through legislative action.
members of the Lower House agree with
Secretary Ordonez, while others lament the Principle of Civilian Supremacy (Q6-2006)
latter's opinion as "questionable, unfortunate, and 2. What Constitutional provisions institutionalize
without any basis at all." Do you or do you not the principle of civilian supremacy? (2.5%)
agree with the aforementioned ruling of the SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Department of Justice? Why? The following constitutional provisions
institutionalize the principle of civilian supremacy:
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No. The Constitution provides that if foreign Civilian authority is at all times supreme over the
military bases, troops or facilities are to be military. [Article II, Section 3]
allowed after the expiration of the present The installation of the President, the highest
Philippine-American Military Bases Agreement civilianin authority, as the Commander-in-Chief of
1991, it must be "under a treaty duly concurred the in military. [Article VII, Section 18]
by the Senate and, when the Congress so The requirement that members of the AFP swear
to uphold and defend the Constitution, which is the
requires, ratified by a majority of the votes cast by
the people in a national referendum." (Art. XVIII, fundamental law of the civil government. [Article
sec. 25) A mere agreement, therefore, not XVI, a Section 5(1)]
treaty, without the concurrence of at least 2/3 of requirement that members of the AFP shall
The
all the members of the Senate will not be valid have respect for people's rights in the performance
of their duty. [Article XVI, Section 5(2)]
(Art. VII, sec. 21, Art. XVIII, sec. 4). With respect
to the provision allowing nuclear weapons within Professionalism in the armed forces. [Article XVI,
the bases, the Constitution appears to ban such Section 5(3)]
weapons from the Philippine territory. It declares Insulation of the AFP from partisan politics. [Article
as a state policy that "the Philippines, consistent XVI, Section 5(3)]
with the national interest, adopts and pursues Prohibition
a against the appointment of an AFP
policy of freedom from nuclear weapons in its member in the active service to a civilian position.
territory." (Art, II, sec. 8) However, the [Article XVI, Section 5(4)]
deliberations of the Constitutional Commission Compulsory retirement of officers without
would seem to indicate that this provision of the extension of service. [Article XVI, Section 5(5)]
Constitution is "not something absolute nor 100 Requirement of proportional recruitment from all
percent without exception." It may therefore be provinces and cities, so as to avoid any regional
that circumstances may justify a provision on clique from forming within the AFP. [Article XVI,
nuclear weapons. Section 5(7)]
A 3-year limitation on the tour of duty of the Chief
of Staff, which although extendible in case of
Philippine Flag (Q4-2006) emergency by the President, depends on
State whether or not the law is constitutional.Congressional declaration of emergency. [Article
Explain briefly. XVI, Section 5(6)]
1. A law changing the design of the
Philippine flag. (2%)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
The law is invalid considering that under Article
XVI, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, the flag
of the Philippines shall be red, white, and blue,
with a sun and three stars, as consecrated and
honored by the people and recognized by law.
Since the Constitution itself prescribes the
design, it can only be changed by constitutional
amendment.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
The law is valid, provided that the new design
does not change the elements and color scheme
of the flag as stated in the Constitution, and the
flag is consecrated and honored by the people.
Since the Constitution itself states that
combat boots at U.S. $30 per pair delivered in Consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a foreign
Jakarta on or before 30 October 1990. The court does not include waiver of the separate
contract was awarded by the Ministry of the Army immunity from execution. (Brownlie, Principles of
to Marikina Shoe Corporation and was signed by Public International Law, 4th ed., p. 344.) Thus, in
the parties in Jakarta. Marikina Shoe Corporation Dexter vs. Carpenter vs. Kunglig
was able to deliver only 200,000 pairs of combat Jarnvagsstyrelsen, 43 Fed 705, it was held the
boots in Jakarta by 30 October 1990 and it consent to be sued does not give consent to the
received payment for 100,000 pairs or a total of attachment of the property of a sovereign
U.S. $3,000,000.00. The Ministry of the Army government.
promised to pay for the other 100,000 pairs
already delivered as soon as the remaining State Immunity from Suit (1996)
300,000 pairs of combat boots are delivered, at No. 6; The Republic of the Balau (formerly Palau
which time the said 300,000 pairs will also be paidIslands) opened and operated in Manila an office
for. Marikina Shoe Corporation failed to deliver engaged in trading Balau products with Philippine
any more combat boots. products. In one transaction, the local buyer
complained that the Balau goods delivered to him
On 1 June 1991, the Republic of Indonesia filed were substandard and he sued the Republic of
an action before the Regional Trial Court of Pasig.Balau, before the Regional Trial Court of Pasig,
Rizal, to compel Marikina Shoe Corporation to for damages. a) How can the Republic of Balau
perform the balance of its obligations under the invoke its sovereign immunity? Explain. b) Will
contract and for damages. In its Answer, Marikinasuch defense of sovereign immunity prosper?
Shoe Corporation sets up a counterclaim for U.S. Explain.
$3,000,000.00 representing the payment for the
100,000 pairs of combat boots already delivered SUGGESTED ANSWER:
but unpaid. Indonesia moved to dismiss the A) The Republic of Balau can invoke its
counterclaim, asserting that it is entitled to sovereign Immunity by filing a motion to dismiss
sovereign Immunity from suit. The trial court in accordance with Section l(a), Rule 16 of the
denied the motion to dismiss and issued two writs Rules of Court on the ground that the court has
of garnishment upon Indonesian Government no jurisdiction over its person.
funds deposited in the Philippine National Bank
and Far East Bank. Indonesia went to the Court of According to the Holy See vs. Rosario, 238 SCRA
Appeals on a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 524, in Public International Law, when a State
of the Rules of Court. How would the Court of wishes to plead sovereign immunity in a foreign
Appeals decide the case? court, it requests the Foreign Office of the State
where it is being sued to convey to the court that it
is entitled to immunity. In the Philippines, the
SUGGESTED ANSWER: practice is for the foreign government to first
The Court of Appeals should dismiss the petition secure an executive endorsement of its claim of
insofar as it seeks to annul the order denying the sovereign immunity. In some cases, the defense
motion of the Government of Indonesia to dismissof sovereign immunity is submitted directly to the
the counterclaim. The counterclaim in this case islocal court by the foreign government through
a compulsory counterclaim since it arises from counsel by filing a motion to dismiss on the
the same contract involved in the complaint. As ground that the court has no Jurisdiction over its
such it must be set up otherwise it will be barred. person.
Above all, as held in Froilan vs. Pan Oriental
Shipping Co., 95 Phil. 905, by filing a complaint,b) No, the defense of sovereign Immunity will not
the state of Indonesia waived its immunity from prosper. The sale of Balau
The establishment of a products
police force is a contract
that is not
suit. It is not right that it can sue in the courts butinvolving a commercial
only civilian activity.
in character but In
also United
underStates vs.
the local
it cannot be sued. The defendant therefore Ruiz, 136SCRA487
executives. and
[Article United
XVI, States
Section 5(7)]vs. Guinto,
acquires the right to set up a compulsory 182 SCRA 644, it was stated that a foreign State
counterclaim against it. cannotState invoke Immunityfrom
Immunity from Suit
suit if(1991)
it enters into a
commercial
No. 13; In contract.
FebruaryThe Philippines
1990, the Ministry adheres
of theto
RESTRICTIVE
Army. Republic SOVEREIGN
of Indonesia, IMMUNITY.
invited bids for the
However, the Court of Appeals should grant the supply of 500,000 pairs of combat boots for the
petition of the Indonesian government insofar as use of the Indonesian Army. The Marikina Shoe
it sought to annul the garnishment of the funds of Corporation, State Immunity fromcorporation,
a Philippine Suit (1989)which has
Indonesia which were deposited in the Philippine no No.branch
13: A property
office andowner filed an
no assets action directly
in Indonesia,
National Bank and Far East Bank. in court against
submitted a bid tothe Republic
supply of thepairs
500,000 Philippines
of
seeking payment for a parcel of land which the
national government utilized for a road widening
project.
(1) Can the government invoke the doctrine of
non-suitability of the state?
(2) In connection with the preceding
question, can the property owner garnish public
funds to satisfy his claim for payment? Explain
your answers.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) No, the government cannot invoke the doctrine
of state of immunity from suit. As held in Ministerio
vs. Court of First Instance of Cebu, 40 SCRA 464,
when the government expropriates property for
public use without paying just compensation, it
cannot invoke its immunity from the suit.
Otherwise, the right guaranteed in Section 9,
Article III of the 1987 Constitution that private
property shall not be taken for public use without
just compensation will be rendered nugatory.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
(2) No, funds of the government on deposit in
the bank cannot be garnished for two reasons:
1Under Art. II, Sec. 29 (1) public funds cannot be spent
except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law,
and
essential public services will be impaired if funds of the
government were subject to execution, (Commissioner
of Public Highways vs. San Diego, 31 SCRA 616
(1970)). The remedy of the prevailing party is to have
the judgment credit in his favor included in the general
appropriations law for the next year.
No, the Northern Luzon Irrigation Authority mayeconomic SUGGESTEDconditions of those engaged in the
ANSWER:
not invoke the immunity of the State from suit,1) tobacco
Yes, the industry.
Municipality of Calumpit is liable for
because, as held in Fontanilla vs. Maliaman, 179the negligence of its driver Johnny. Under
SCRA 685 and 194 SCRA 486, irrigation is aSection State 24Immunity
of the Local from Suit (1987)Code, local
Government
proprietary function. Besides, the Northern Luzongovernment (a) "X" filed a case
units areagainst the Republic
not exempt of the for
from liability
Irrigation Authority has a juridical personalitydeath Philippines
or injuryfortodamages
personscausedor damage his yacht, which
to property.
separate and distinct from the government, a suitwas rammed by a navy vessel.
against it is not a suit against the State. Since the (b) ALTERNATIVE
"X" also sued in another case the
ANSWER:
waiver of the immunity from suit is without Secretary of Public Works
No, the municipality and the
is not liable forRepublic of the
the negligence
qualification, as held in Rayo vs. Court of First Philippines
of Johnny,forthe payment
prevailingof therulecompensation
in the law of of
Instance of Bulacan, 110 SCRA 456, the waiver the value of
municipal his land, which
corporations is thatwas a used as part is
municipality ofnot
includes an action based on a quasi-delict. the
liabletarmac
for of thethetorts
Cebucommitted
InternationalbyAirport, its regular
without
employees prior inexpropriation
the discharge proceedings.
of governmental
functions. The municipality is answerable only
State Immunity from Suit (1999) when it is acting in a proprietary capacity.
A. 1.) What do you understand by state immunity
from suit? Explain. (2%) The Solicitor General moved to dismiss the two
2.) How may consent of the state to be sued be Incases the invoking
case atstate bar,immunity
Johnnyfrom wassuitaDecide.
regular
given? Explain. (2%) SUGGESTED ANSWER: employee of the
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Municipality of Calumpit as
1.) STATE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT means that (a) driver of its dump truck; he
The government cannot be sued for damagescommitted a tortious
the State cannot be sued without its consent. A considering act while discharging
that the agency a governmental
which caused function
the for
corollary of such principle is that properties used damages the municipality, ie., drivingNavy.
was the Philippine recklessly
Under the Art. said
by the State in the performance of its truck of
2180 loaded withCode,
the Civil sand the for state
the repair
consentsof municipal
to be
governmental functions cannot be subject to streets.
sued for aUndoubtedly
quasi-delict only then,when Johnny as driveris of
the damage
judicial execution. the dump
caused truck
by its wasagents.
special performing Hence, a duty or task
the Solicitor
pertainingmotion
General's to hisshould office. The construction
be granted and the suit or
maintenance
brought by "X" be of dismissed.
public streets are admittedly
2.) Consent of the State to be sued may be made governmental activities. At the time of the
expressly as in the case of a specific, express accident, Johnny was engaged in the discharge
provision of law as waiver of State immunity from of(b)governmental But the government functions. CANNOT INVOKE the
suit is not inferred lightly (e.g. C.A. 327 as amended state's immunity from suit. As held in Ministerio
by PD 1445} or impliedly as when the Statev.Hence, Court ofthe death
First of the40
Instance. twoSCRApassengers
464 (1971), of the
engages in proprietary functions (U.S. jeepney
which also-tragic
involved andthe deplorable
taking of though
private itproperty
may be
v. Ruiz, U.S. v. Guinto) or when it files a suit in whichwithout- imposed on theof municipality
the benefit expropriationno duty to pay
proceeding,
case the adverse party may file a counterclaim"The monetary
doctrine compensation,
of governmental as held
immunityin Municipality
from suit
(Froilan v. Pan Oriental Shipping) or when the doctrinecannot of San.serve
Fernando
as an v. Firme, 195
instrument forSCRA 692. an
perpetrating
would in effect be used to perpetuate an injusticeinjustice on a citizen. . . . When the government
(Amigable v. Cuenca, 43 takesState Immunity
any property for from
publicSuituse,(1992)
which is
SCRA 360). No. 9: Theupon
conditional Northern
the payment Luzon ofIrrigation
just Authority
(NLIA) was established
compensation, to be judiciallyby a legislative
ascertained, charter
it to
State Immunity from Suit (1999) strengthen
makes manifest the thatirrigation
it submits systems that supply
to the jurisdiction
No VI - B. The employees of the Philippineof water to farms
the court." Theand commercial
Solicitor General's growers
motion to in the
Tobacco Administration (PTA) sued to recoverdismiss area. Whileshould,the NLIA be
therefore, is denied.
able to generate
overtime pay. In resisting such claim, the PTArevenues through its operations, it receives an
theorized
State Immunitythat itfromis Suit
performing
(1994) governmentalannual appropriation from Congress. The NLIA is
functions.
No. 6; Johnny was employed (2%)
Decide and explain. as a driver by theauthorized to "exercise all the powers of a
SUGGESTED
Municipality of ANSWER:
Calumpit, Bulacan. While drivingcorporation under the Corporation Code."
As held in Philippine
recklessly a municipal Virginia
dump Tobacco
truck with its load of
Administration v. Court of Industrial
sand for the repair of municipal Relations,
streets, 65 Due to a miscalculation by some of its
Johnny
SCRA 416, the Philippine Tobacco Administration
hit a jeepney. Two passengers of the jeepneyemployees, there was a massive irrigation
is not killed.
were liable for overtime pay, since it is performingoverflow causing a flash flood in Barrio Zanjera. A
governmental functions. Among its purposes are child drowned in the incident and his parents now
to
The promote the effective
Sangguniang Bayanmerchandising of tobaccofile suit against The NLIA for damages.
passed an ordinance
so that those engaged
appropriating P300,000inasthe tobacco industry
compensation will
for the
have
heirs economic security,
of the victims. 1) Is to
thestabilize the price
municipality liableof May the NLIA validly invoke the immunity of the
tobacco, and to improve the living and
for the negligence State from suit? Discuss thoroughly.
of Johnny? 2) Is the municipal SUGGESTED ANSWER:
ordinance valid?
prove that the State is liable but the State retains
the right to raise all lawful defenses. c) Section 1, Article XVII of the Constitution
provides: "The FLAG OF THE PHILIPPINES
State Immunity from Suit (1993) shall be red, white, and blue, with a sun and
No 19: Devi is the owner of a piece of land.three stars, as consecrated and honored by the
Without prior expropriation or negotiated sale, thepeople and recognized by law."
national government used a portion thereof for the
widening of the national highway. Devi filed Section a 2, Article XVI of the Constitution states:
money claim with the Commission on Audit which The Congress may by law, adopt a new name for
was denied. Left with no other recourse, Devi filed the country, a national anthem, or a national seal,
a complaint for recovery of property and/or which shall all be truly reflective and symbolic of
damages against the Secretary of Public Works the ideals, history, and traditions of the people.
and Highways and the Republic of the Philippines, Such law shall take effect only upon its
The defendant moved for dismissal of the ratification by the people in a national
complaint contending that the government cannot referendum."
be sued without its consent. The RTC dismissed
the complaint. On appeal, how would you decide d) Section 22, Article II of the Constitution
the case. provides: The State recognizes and promotes the
rights of INDIGENOUS CULTURAL
SUGGESTED ANSWER: COMMUNITIES within the framework of national
The order dismissing the complaint should be unity and development."
reversed. In Ministerio v. Court of First Instance of
Cebu, 40 SCRA 464, it was held that when the Section 5, Article XII of the Constitution reads: The
government takes property from a private State, subject to the provisions of this Constitution
landowner without prior expropriation andor national development policies and programs,
negotiated sale, the landowner may maintain shall a protect the rights of indigenous cultural
suit against the government without violating the communities to their ancestral lands to ensure
doctrine of government Immunity from suit. The their economic, social and cultural well-being.
government should be deemed to have waived
impliedly its immunity from suit. Otherwise, the
constitutional guarantee that private property shall The Congress may provide for the applicability of
not be taken for public use without just customary laws governing property rights or
compensation will be rendered nugatory. relations in determining the ownership and extent
of the ancestral domains."
State Principles & Policies (1994) Section 6, Art. XIII of the Constitution provides: The
No. 1; What is the state policy on: State shall apply the principles of AGRARIAN
a) working women? b) ecology? REFORM or stewardship, whenever applicable in
c) the symbols of statehood? d) accordance with law, in the disposition or utilization
cultural minorities? e) science and of other natural resources, including lands of the
technology? public domain under lease or concession suitable
to agriculture, subject to prior rights, homestead
rights of small settlers, and the rights of indigenous
SUGGESTED ANSWER: communities to their ancestral lands.
a) Section 14, Article XIII of the ConstitutionState Immunity vs. Waiver of Immunity (1997)
provides: "The State shall protect WORKING
WOMEN by providing safe and healthful workingNo, 6: It is said that "waiver of immunity by the
conditions, taking into account their maternalStateThe State
doesmay not mean
resettlea landless
concessionfarmers
of itsand
liability".
farm
functions, and such facilities and opportunitiesWhat
workersareinthe
itsimplications
own agricultural
of this
estates
phrase? which shall
that will enhance their welfare and enable them tobe distributed to them in the manner provided by
realize their full potential in the service of thelaw."SUGGESTED ANSWER:
nation." The phrase that waiver of immunity by the State
does not
Section 17.mean a concession
Article of liability means
XIV of the Constitution states:
b) Section 16, Article II of the Constitution"The that State
by consenting to be sued,
shall recognize, the and
respect Stateprotect
does not
provides: The State shall protect and advancethe necessarily admit it is liable.
rights of indigenous Ascommunities
cultural stated in to
Philippine
the right of the people and their posterity to apreserve andRock Industries,
develop Inc. vs. Board
their cultures, of
traditions,
balanced and healthful ECOLOGY in accord withand Liquidators, 180It SCRA
institutions. shall 171, in such a case the
the rhythm and harmony of nature." State is merely giving the plaintiff a chance to
consider these rights in the formulation of Section 12, Article XIV of the Constitution reads:
national plans and policies." The State shall regulate the transfer and promote
the adaptation of technology from all sources for
e) Section 17, Article II of the Constitution the national benefit. It shall encourage widest
provides: "The State shall give priority to participation of private groups, local governments,
EDUCATION, SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, and community-based organizations in the
ARTS, CULTURE, and SPORTS to foster generation and utilization of science and
patriotism and nationalism, accelerate social technology."
progress, and promote total human liberation and
development." NOTE: It is suggested that if an examinee gave a substantive
answer without giving the exact provisions of the Constitution,
then he should be given full credit. Further, one provision
Section 14, Article XII of the Constitution reads inquoted/discussed by the examinee should be sufficient for him
part: "The sustained development of a reservoir ofto be given full credit.
NATIONAL TALENTS consisting of Filipino
scientists, entrepreneurs, professionals,Transparency; Matters of Public Interest
managers, high-level technical manpower and (1989)
skilled workers and craftsmen shall be promotedNo. 3: Does the 1987 Constitution provide for a
by the State, The State shall encouragepolicy of transparency in matters of public
appropriate technology and regulate Its transferinterest? Explain.
for the national benefit. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Yes, the 1987 Constitution provides for a policy
Sub-section 2, Section 3. Article XIV of theof transparency in matters of public interest.
Constitution states: "They (EDUCATIONALSection 28, Article II of the 1987 Constitution
INSTITUTIONS) shall inculcate patriotism andprovides:
nationalism, foster love of humanity, respect 1"Subject
for to reasonable conditions prescribed by
law,
human rights, appreciation of the role of national the State adopts and implements a policy of full
heroes in the historical development of the disclosure of all its transactions involving public
interest,"
country, teach the rights and duties of citizenship,
strengthen ethical and spiritual values, develop Section 7, Article III of the 1987 Constitution states:
moral character and personal discipline, "The right of the people to information on matters of
encourage critical and creative thinking, broadenpublic concern shall be recognized, Access to
scientific and technological knowledge, and official records, and to documents, and papers
promote vocational efficiency." pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions,
as well as to government research data used as
basis for policy development, shall be afforded the
Section 10. Article XIV of the Constitution declares:
"SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY are essentialcitizen, for subject to such limitations as may be
provided
national development and progress. The State shall by law."
give priority to research and development, Section 20, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution
reads:
invention, innovation, and their utilization; and to "The records and books of account of the
science and technology education, training, Congress shall be preserved and be open to the
public
services. It shall support indigenous, appropriate, in accordance with law, and such books shall
be audited
and self-reliant scientific and cultural capabilities, by the Commission on Audit which shall
and their application to the country's productivepublish annually an itemized list of amounts paid to
systems and national life." and expenses incurred for each member."
Under Section 17, Article XI of the 1987
Constitution, the sworn statement of assets,
liabilities and net worth of the President, the Vice-
Section 11, Article XIV of the Constitution provides:
"The Congress may provide for incentives, President, the Members of the Cabinet, the
including TAX DEDUCTIONS, to encourage Congress, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional
private participation in programs of basic Commission
and and other constitutional offices, and
officers of the
applied scientific research. Scholarships, grants-in-
aid or other forms of Incentives shall be provided to
deserving science students, researchers,
scientists, investors, technologists, and specially
gifted citizens."
armed forces with general or flag rank filed
upon their assumption of office shall be
disclosed to the public in the manner provided
by law.
5. "A public officer or employee shall, upon
1Section 21, Article XII of the Constitution declares:
assumption of office, and as often as thereafter
"Information on foreign loans obtained or guaranteed
may be required by law, submit a declaration under
by the government shall be made available to the oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the
public." case of the President, the Vice President, the
As held in Valmonte vs. Belmonte, G.R. No. 74930, Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the
Feb. 13, 1989, these provisions on public disclosures
Supreme Court, the Constitutional Commissions
are intended to enhance the role of the citizenry and
in other constitutional offices, and officers of the
governmental decision-making as well as in checking
armed forces with general or flag rank, the
abuse in government. declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the
manner provided by law." (Section 17, Article XI)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) Executive Orders Nos. 1, 2 and 14 were
issued in 1986. At that time President Corazon
Aquino exercised legislative power ....
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2} Pursuant to the decision in People us.
Castmillo. 213. SCRA 777, Johann need not be
informed of his right to counsel prior to his
identification during the police line-up. The police
line-up is not part of custodial investigation, since
Johann was not being questioned but was merely
being asked to exhibit his body for identification by
a witness.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER
It may be argued that in United States vs. Wade.
388 U.S. 218 (1967) and Gilbert vs. California.
388 U.S. 263 (1967) It was held that on the basis
of the Sixth, rather than the Fifth Amendment
(equivalent to Art. III. sec. 14 (2) rather than sec.
12 (1)), the police lineup is such a "critical stage"
that it carries "potential substantial prejudice" for
which reason the accused is entitled to the
assistance of counsel.
Due Process; Deportation (1994) 2) No, Stevie was not denied due process simply
No. 9: A complaint was filed by Intelligence agents
because the complainants, the prosecutor, and the
of the Bureau of Immigration and Deportation (BID)hearing officers were all subordinates of the
against Stevie, a German national, for his Commissioner of the Bureau of Immigration and
deportation as an undesirable alien. The Deportation. In accordance with the ruling in
Immigration Commissioner directed the Special Erianger & Galinger, Inc. vs. Court of Industrial
Board of Inquiry to conduct an Investigation. At the
Relations, 110 Phil. 470, the findings of the
said Investigation, a lawyer from the Legal subordinates are not conclusive upon the
Department of the BID presented as witnesses the Due Process; Absence
Commissioners, who have ofthe
Denial (1999)to accept
discretion
three Intelligence agents who filed the complaint.or
Noreject
VIII - them.
B. On Aprilis6,important
What 1963, Police Officer
is that StevieMario
was
On the basis of the findings, report and Gatdula
not was charged
deprived of his rightby the Mayor with
to present his Grave
own case
recommendation of the Board of Special Inquiry,andMisconduct
submitand Violationinof Law
evidence before
support the
thereof, the
the BID Commissioners unanimously voted for decision
MunicipalisBoard. The by
supported Board investigated
substantial Gatdula
evidence, and
Stevie's deportation. Stevie's lawyer questioned the
but
the commissioners
before the caseactedcouldon be their
decided,
own the City
independent
deportation order 1) On the ground that Stevie wascharter was approved.
consideration of the lawThe andCityfactsFiscal,
of theciting
case, and
denied due process because the BID Section
did not30simply
of the city charter,the
accept asserted
viewsthatofhe their
was
Commissioners who rendered the decision weresubordinates
authorized thereunder
in arrivingtoatinvestigate
a decision.city officers
not the ones who and employees. The case against Gatdula was
then forwarded to
Due Process; Forfeiture Proceedings (1993) the proceedings, and in the last analysis to avoid
No. 14: The S/S "Masoy" of Panamanian registry,a miscarriage of justice.
while moored at the South Harbor, was found to
have contraband goods on board. The Customs Due Process; Meeting vs. Hearing (1999)
Team found out that the vessel did not have the No VIII - C. On November 7, 1990, nine lawyers of
required ship's permit and shipping documents. the Legal Department of Y Bank who were all
The vessel and its cargo were held and a warrant under Fred Torre, sent a complaint to
of Seizure and Detention was issued after due management accusing Torre of abusive conduct
investigation. In the course of the forfeiture and mismanagement. Furnished with a copy of
proceedings, the ship captain and the ship's the complaint, Torre denied the charges. Two
resident agent executed sworn statements before days later, the lawyers and Torre were called to a
the Custom legal officer admitting that contraband conference in the office of the Board Chairman to
cargo were found aboard the vessel. The give their respective sides of the controversy.
shipping lines object to the admission of the However, no agreement was reached thereat.
statements as evidence contending that during Bank Director Romulo Moret was tasked to look
their execution, the captain and the shipping further into the matter. He met with the lawyers
agent were not assisted by counsel, in violation of together with Torre several times but to no avail.
due process. Decide. Moret then submitted a report sustaining the
charges of the lawyers. The Board Chairman
SUGGESTED ANSWER: wrote Torre to inform him that the bank had
The admission of the statements of the captainchosen the compassionate option of "waiting" for
and the shipping agent as evidence did notTorre's resignation. Torre was asked, without
violate due process even if they were notbeing dismissed, to turn over the documents of all
assisted by counsel. In Feeder International Line,cases handled by him to another official of the
Pts. Ltd. v. Court of Appeals, 197 SCRA 842, Itbank but Torre refused to resign and requested for
was held that the assistance of counsel is nota "full hearing". Days later, he reiterated his
indispensable to due process in forfeiturerequest for a "full hearing", claiming that he had
proceedings since such proceedings are notbeen "constructively dismissed". Moret assured
criminal in nature. Torre that he is "free to remain in the employ of
the bank" even if he has no particular work
Moreover, the strict rules of evidence and assignment. After another request for a "full
procedure will not apply in administrative hearing" was ignored, Torre filed a complaint with
proceedings like seizure and forfeiture
the arbitration branch of NLRC for illegal
proceedings. What is important is that the parties dismissal. Reacting thereto, the bank terminated
are afforded the opportunity to be heard and the the services of Torre. Questions: (a) Was Torre
decision of the administrative authority is based "constructively
on dismissed" before he filed his
substantial evidence. complaint? (b) Given the multiple meetings held
among the bank officials, the lawyers and Torre, is
Due Process; Media Coverage during Hearing it correct for him to say that he was not given an
(1996) opportunity to be heard? Explain your answers.
No 2: At the trial of a rape case where the victim- (4%)
complainant was a well known personality while
the accused was a popular movie star, a TV station
was allowed by the trial judge to televise the entire SUGGESTED ANSWER:
proceedings like the a) Torre was constructively dismissed, as held in
O.J. Simpson trial. The accused objected to the Equitable Banking Corporation v. National Labor
TV coverage and petitioned the Supreme Court Relations Commission, 273 SCRA 352. Allowing
to prohibit the said coverage. As the Supreme an employee to report for work without being
Court, how would you rule on the petition? assigned any work constitutes constructive
Explain. dismissal.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The Supreme Court should grant the petition. In b) Torre is correct in saying that he was not given
its Resolution dated October 22, 1991, the the chance to be heard. The meetings in the
Supreme Court prohibited live radio and televisionnature of consultations and conferences cannot
coverage of court proceedings to protect the right be considered as valid substitutes for the proper
of the parties to due process, to prevent the observance of notice and hearing.
distraction of the participants in
Due Process; Notice by Publication (1988)
No. 9: Macabebe, Pampanga has several barrios
along the Pampanga river. To service the needs
of their residentst the municipality has been
operating a ferry service at the same river, for a
number of years already.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The orders in this case involve the exercise of
judicial function by an administrative agency, and 2) Pursuant to the ruling in Pasay City
therefore, as a general rule, the cardinal primary Government vs. Court of First Instance of Manila,
rights enumerated in Ang Tibay v. CIR, 69 Phil. 132 SCRA 156, since the Municipality of Antipolo
635 (1940) must be observed. In Vigart has appropriated P1,000,000 to pay
for the lot, its bank account may be garnished
(2) As the judge, rule on the said objections.
but up to this amount only. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Eminent Domain; Garnishment (1998) (1) As counsel for C Company, I will argue that the
No VI - 2, If the City of Cebu has money in bank,taking of the property is not for a public use and
can it be garnished? [2%] that the ordinance cannot fix the compensation to
SUGGESTED ANSWER: be paid C Company, because this is a judicial
2. No, the money of the City of Cebu in the bankquestion that is for the courts to decide.
cannot be garnished if it came from public funds.
As held in Municipality of Makati vs. Court of(2) As judge, I will sustain the contention that the
Appeals, 190 SCRA 206, 212, public funds aretaking of the property of C Company to operate
exempted from garnishment. the commercial center established within it to
finance a housing project for city employees is not
Eminent Domain; immunity from suit (2001) for a public use but for a private purpose. As the
No III - The Republic of the Philippines, throughCourt indicated in a dictum in Manotok. v. National
the Department of Public Works and HighwaysHousing Authority, 150 SCRA 89, that the
(DPWH), constructed a new highway linkingexpropriation of a commercial center so that the
Metro Manila and Quezon province, and whichprofits derived from its operation can be used for
major thoroughfare traversed the land owned byhousing projects is a taking for a private purpose.
Mang Pandoy. The government neither filed any
expropriation proceedings nor paid any
compensation to Mang Pandoy for the land thus
taken and used as a public road.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The motion to dismiss should be denied. As held in
Amigable v. Cuenca, 43 SCRA 300 (1972), when
the Government expropriates private property
without paying compensation, it is deemed to have
waived its immunity from suit. Otherwise, the
constitutional guarantee that private property shall
not be taken for public use without payment of just
compensation will be rendered nugatory.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The arguments of Madlangbayan are not
meritorious. According to Manosca v. Court of
Appeals, 252 SCRA 412 (1996), the power of
eminent domain is not confined to expropriation of
vast tracts of the land. The expropriation of the lot
to preserve it as the birthplace of the founder of
the religious sect because of his role in Philippine
history and culture is for a public purpose,
because public use is no longer restricted to the
traditional concept. The fact that the expropriation
will benefit the members of the religious sect is
merely incidental. The fact that other birthplaces
have not been expropriated is likewise not a valid
basis for opposing the expropriation. As held in
J.M. Tuason and Company, Inc. v. Land Tenure
Administration, 31 SCRA 413 (1970), the
expropriating authority is not required to adhere to
the policy of "all or none".
The Asian Broadcasting Network (ABN), a Police Power; Zoning Ordinance vs. Non-
privately owned television station, refuses to air Impairment of Contracts (2001)
the advertisement in compliance with the law. No XVIII In the deeds of sale to, and in the land
Decide the constitutionality of the law in question.titles of homeowners of a residential subdivision in
Pasig City, there are restrictions annotated therein
SUGGESTED ANSWER: to the effect that only residential houses or
The law is constitutional. It is a valid exercise structures
of may be built or constructed on the lots.
police power, because smoking is harmful However, to the City Council of Pasig enacted an
health. In Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates vs. ordinance amending the existing zoning ordinance
Tourism Company of Puerto Rico, 478 U.S. 328,by it changing the zone classification in that place
was ruled that a law prohibiting certain types from of purely residential to commercial.
advertisements is valid if it was adopted in the
interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the
people. In Capital Broadcasting Company us. "A", a lot owner, sold his lot to a banking firm and
Mitchell 333 F Supp 582, a law making it unlawful the latter started constructing a commercial
to advertise cigarettes on any medium building of on the lot to house a bank inside the
electronic communication was upheld. subdivision. The subdivision owner and the
The
United States Supreme Court summarily homeowners' association filed a case in court to
sustained this ruling in Capita! Broadcasting stop the construction of the building for banking
Company us, Acting Attorney General 405 U.S. business purposes and to respect the restrictions
1000. The law in question was enacted on the embodied in the deed of sale by the subdivision
developer to the lot owners, as well as the
basis of the legislative finding that there is a need
to protect public health, because smoking causes annotation in the titles.
lung diseases. Cowboy Levy's has not
overthrown this finding. If you were the Judge, how would you resolve
the case? (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Police Power; Zoning Ordinance vs. Non- If I were the judge, I would dismiss the case. As
Impairment of Contracts (1989) held in Ortigas and Company Limited Partnership
No. 12: Pedro bought a parcel of land from Smart vs. FEATI Bank and Trust Company. 94 SCRA
Corporation, a realty firm engaged in developing 633 (1979), the zoning ordinance is a valid
and selling lots to the public. One of the exercise of police power and prevails over the
restrictions in the deed of sale which was contractual stipulation restricting the use of the lot
annotated in the title is that the lot shall be usedto residential purposes.
by the buyer exclusively for residential purposes.
A main highway having been constructed across
the subdivision, the area became commercial in Privacy of Communication (2001)
nature. The municipality later passed a zoning No XII - "A" has a telephone line with an extension.
ordinance declaring the area as a commercial One day, "A" was talking to "B" over the telephone.
bank building on his lot. Smart Corporation went "A" conspired with his friend "C", who was at the
end of the extension line listening to "A's"
to court to stop the construction as violative of the
telephone conversation with "B" in order to
building restrictions imposed by it. The corporation
contends that the zoning ordinance cannot nullify overhear and tape-record the conversation wherein
the contractual obligation assumed by the buyer. "B" confidentially admitted that with evident
Decide the case. premeditation, he (B) killed "D" for having cheated
him in their business partnership. "B" was not
SUGGESTED ANSWER: aware that the telephone conversation was being
The case must be dismissed. As held in Ortigastape-recorded.
and Company, Limited Partnership vs. FEATIi
Bank and Trust Company, 94 SCRA 533, such a
restriction in the contract cannot prevail over the
zoning ordinance, because the enactment
In the criminal case against "B" for murder, is the moved for its return on the ground that it violates
tape-recorded conversation containing his the right of "X" against unlawful search and
admission admissible in evidence? Why? (5%) seizure. Decide.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The tape-recorded conversation is not admissibleThe objection of the lawyer must be sustained,
in evidence. As held in Salcedo-Ortanez vs. CourtSection 3(1), Article IV of the 1987 Constitution
of Appeals, 235 SCRA 111 (1994). Republic Actprovides:
No. 4200 makes the tape-recording of a telephone"The privacy of communication and
conversation done without the authorizationcorrespondence
of all shall be inviolable except
the parties to the conversation, inadmissible upon in lawful order of the court, or when public
evidence. In addition, the taping ofsafety theor order requires otherwise as
conversation violated the guarantee of privacy of prescribed by law."
communications enunciated in Section 3, Article III
of the Constitution. There was no court order which authorized the
warden to read the letter of "X". Neither is there
any law specifically authorizing the Bureau of
Privacy of Correspondence (1998) Prisons to read the letter of "X", Under Section
No VII. - The police had suspicions that Juan3(1), Article III of the 1987 Constitution, to
Samson, member of the subversive Newinterfere with any correspondence when there is
Proletarian Army, was using the mail forno court order, there must be a law authorizing it
propaganda purposes in gaining new adherentsin the interest of public safety or order.
to its cause. The Chief of Police of Bantolan,
Lanao del Sur ordered the Postmaster of the town
to intercept and open all mail addressed to andThe ruling of the United States Supreme Court in
coming from Juan Samson in the interest of thethe case of Stroud vs. United States, 251
national security. Was the order of the Chief of U.S. 15 is not applicable here, because Section
Police valid? (5%) 3(1), Article III of the 1987 Constitution has no
SUGGESTED ANSWER: counterpart in the American Constitution. Hence,
No, the order of the Chief of Police is not valid,in accordance with Section 3(2), Article III of the
because there is no law which authorizes him to1987 Constitution, the letter is inadmissible in
order the Postmaster to open the letters evidence.
addressed to and coming from Juan Samson. An
official in the Executive Department cannot ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
interfere with the privacy of correspondence and The objection of the lawyer must be overruled. In
communication in the absence of a law Hudson vs. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, it was held that
authorizing him to do so or a lawful order of the the constitutional prohibition against illegal
court. Section 3(1), Article III of the Constitutionsearches and seizures does not extend to the
provides: confines of the prison. In Stroud vs. United States,
"The privacy of communication and 251 U.S. 15, the United States Supreme Court held
correspondence shall be inviolable that letters voluntarily written by a prisoner and
except upon lawful order of the court, or examined by the warden which contained
when public safety or order requires incriminatory statements were admissible in
otherwise as prescribed by law." evidence. Their inspection by the prison authorities
did not violate the constitutional prohibition against
Privacy of Correspondence; Jail (1989) illegal searches and seizures. This is an
No. 8: While serving sentence in Muntinlupa for established practice reasonably designed to
the crime of theft, "X" stabbed dead one of his promote discipline within the penitentiary.
guards, "X" was charged with murder. During his
trial, the prosecution introduced as evidence a
letter written in prison by "X" to his wife tending toRight to Assembly; Permit Application;
establish that the crime of murder was the result Freedom Parks (Q2-2006)
of premeditation. The letter was written The Samahan ng mga Mahihirap (SM) filed with
voluntarily. In the course of inspection, it was the Office of the City Mayor of Manila an
opened and read by a warden pursuant to the application for permit to hold a rally on Mendiola
rules of discipline of the Bureau of Prisons and Street on September 5, 2006 from 10:00 a.m. to
considering its contents, the letter was turned 3:00 p.m. to protest the political killings of
over to the prosecutor. The lawyer of "X" journalists. However, the City Mayor denied their
objected to the presentation of the letter and application on the ground that a rally at the
time and place applied for will block the traffic in SUGGESTED ANSWER:
the San Miguel and Quiapo Districts. He The arrests are unlawful. What is prohibited and
suggested the Liwasang Bonifacio, which has penalized under Sec. 13 (a) and 14 (a) of B.P.
been designated a Freedom Park, as venue for Big 880 is "the holding of any public assembly as
the rally. defined in this Act by any leader or organizer
without having first secured that written permit
1. Does the SM have a remedy to contest where a permit is required from the office
the denial of its application for a permit? (2.5%) concerned x x x Provided, however, that no
person can be punished or held criminally liable
SUGGESTED ANSWER: for participating in or attending an otherwise
Yes, SM has a remedy. Under B.P. Big. 880 (Thepeaceful assembly."
Public Assembly Act of 1985), in the event of
denial of the application for a permit, the applicantThus, only the leader or organizer of the rally
may contest the decision in an appropriate courtwithout a permit may be arrested without a
of law. The court must decide within twenty-fourwarrant while the members may not be arrested,
(24) hours from the date of filing of the case. Saidas they can not be punished or held criminally
decision may be appealed to the appropriateliable for attending the rally. However, under
court within forty-eight (48) hours after receipt ofSection 12 thereof, when the public assembly is
the same. In all cases, any decision may beheld without a permit where a permit is required,
appealed to the Supreme Court (Bayan Muna v.the said public assembly may be peacefully
Ermita, G.R. No. 169838, April 25, 2006). dispersed.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) Yes, the police operatives may lawfully seize
the cocaine, because it is an item whose
possession is prohibited by law, it was in plain
view and it was only inadvertently discovered in
the course of a lawful search. The possession of
cocaine is prohibited by Section 8 of the
Dangerous Drugs Act. As held in Magoncia v.
Palacio, 80 Phil. 770, an article whose possession
is prohibited by law may be seized without the
need of any search warrant if it was discovered
during a lawful search. The additional requirement
laid down in Roan v. Gonzales, 145 SCRA 687
that the discovery of the article must have been
made inadvertently was also satisfied in this case.
Citizenship; Elected Official (1993) the United States but also to the Republic of
No. 7: Ferdie immigrated to the United States in China. Decide. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
the 1980s. Thereafter, he visited his hometown, The electoral contest must be dismissed.
Makahoy, every other year during town fiestas. In
January 1993. Ferdie came home and filed his
certificate of candidacy for Mayor of Makahoy. He(a) "A" is a natural born citizen. Art. IV, Sec. 2 of
won in the elections. Joe, the defeated candidate, the 1987 Constitution provides that "those who
learned that Ferdie is a greencard holder which elect Philippine citizenship in accordance with
on its face identifies Ferdie as a "resident alien" paragraph (3), Sec. 1 hereof shall be deemed
and on the back thereof is clearly printed: natural born citizens." The purpose of this
provision is to equalize the status of those who
"Person identified by this card is entitled to elected Philippine citizenship before and those
reside permanently and work in the United who did so after January 17, 1973 when the
States." Joe filed a case to disqualify Ferdie previous Constitution took effect.
from assuming the mayorship of Maka-hoy.
Questions: (b) The "DUAL ALLEGIANCE" declared inimical
(1) Whether or not a green card is proof that the to national interest in Art. IV, Sec. 5 refers to the
holder is a permanent resident of the United dual allegiance of some such as naturalized
States. Filipino citizens (mostly Chinese) who maintain
allegiance to Nationalist China as
shown in some cases by their membership in the
legislative Yuan after their naturalization asof the Philippines (Art. IV, sec. 1(3)). Under Art.
citizens of the Philippines. The prohibition doesIV, sec, 2 he is also deemed a natural-born
not apply in situations brought about by dualcitizen.
citizenship, such as the one involved in the
problem. Indeed, a Filipino woman can have dual2. The Constitution requires, among other things,
allegiance resulting from her marriage to athat a candidate for member of the House of
foreigner under Sec. 4, so long as she does notRepresentatives must be at least 25 years of age
do or omit to do an act amounting to renunciation"on the day of the election." (Art. VI, sec. 6). As
under Commonwealth Act. No. 63, Sec. 1(2).Brown was born on May 15, 1962, he did not
Under this law, express renunciation is differentbecome 25 years old until May 15, 1987. Hence
from an act of allegiance to a foreign power as aon May 11, 1987, when the election was held, he
ground for loss of Philippine citizenship.was 4 days short of the required age.
Moreover, what constitutes "dual allegiance"
inimical to national interest is and what the
3. The Constitution provides that those who seek
sanctions for such dual allegiance will be, will still
have to be defined by law pending adoption of either to change their citizenship or to acquire the
such legislation, objection based on dual status of an immigrant of another country "during
allegiance will be premature. their tenure" shall be dealt with by law (Art. XI,
sec. 17). The provision cannot apply to Brown for
the following reasons: First, Brown is in addition
Dual Allegiance vs. Dual Citizenship (1988) an American citizen and thus has a dual
No. 13: Robert Brown was born in Hawaii on May citizenship which is allowed by the Constitution.
15, 1962, of an American father and a Filipina (Cf. Art. IV, sec. 4), Second, Brown did not seek
mother. On May 16, 1983 while holding an to acquire the status of an immigrant, but is an
American passport, he registered as a Filipino American by birth under the principle of jus soli
with the Philippine Consulate at Honolulu, Hawaii. obtaining in the United States. Third, he did not
In September, 1983 he returned to the seek to change his status during his tenure as a
Philippines, and took up residence at Boac, public officer. Fourth, the provision of Art. XI, sec.
Marinduque, hometown of his mother. He 17 is not self-executing but requires an
registered as a voter, voted, and even participatedimplementing law. Fifth, but above all, the House
Electoral Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide this
as a leader of one of the candidates in that district
in the 1984 Batasan elections. In the elections of question since it does not concern the
1987, he ran for Congressman, and won. His sole qualification of a member-elect.
opponent is now questioning his qualifications and
is trying to oust him on two basic claims:
(1) He is not a natural born Filipino citizen, but is Dual Citizenship (1994)
in fact, an American, born in Hawaii, an integralNo. 8: In 1989, Zeny Reyes married Ben Tulog, a
portion of the U.S.A., who holds an American national of the State of Kongo. Under the laws of
passport; Kongo, an alien woman marrying a Kongo national
(2) He did not meet the age requirement; and automatically acquires Kongo citizenship. After her
(3) He has a "green card" from the U.S. marriage, Zeny resided in Kongo and acquired a
Government. Kongo passport. In 1991, Zeny returned to the
Philippines to run for Governor of Sorsogon.
Assume that you are a member of the House (1) Was Zeny qualified to run for Governor?
Electoral Tribunal where the petition for Brown's (2) Suppose instead of entering politics. Zeny
ouster is pending. How would you decide the just got herself elected as vice-president of the
three issues raised against him? Philippine Bulletin, a local newspaper. Was she
SUGGESTED ANSWER: qualified to hold that position?
The first and third grounds have no merit. But
the second is well taken and, therefore, Brown
should be disqualified.
1. Robert Brown is a natural born citizen of the
Philippines. A person born of a Filipino mother
and an alien father before January 17, 1973, who
thereafter upon reaching the age of majority elect
Philippine citizenship, is a citizen
the day of the election, Zeny is not qualified to run not qualify to participate in the management of
for Governor of Sorsogon. Under Section 39(a) of the Bulletin as Vice-President thereof.
the Local Government Code, a candidate for
governor must be a resident in the province Effect of Marriage; Filipino (1989)
where he intends to run at least one No, 2: (1) Lily Teh arrived in Manila on one of her
(1) year immediately preceding the day of the regular tours to the Philippines from Taipeh. She
election. By residing in Kongo upon her marriagemet Peter Go, a naturalized Filipino citizen. After a
in 1989, Zeny abandoned her residence in the whirlwind courtship, Lily and Peter were married at
Philippines. This is in accordance with the the San Agustin Church. A week after the wedding,
decision in Caasi vs. Court of Appeals, 191 SCRA Lily Teh petitioned in administrative proceedings
229. before immigration authorities to declare her a
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Filipino citizen stating that she had none of the
No. Zeny was not qualified to run for Governor. disqualifications provided in the Revised
Under the Constitution, "citizens of the Philippines
Naturalization Law. The jilted Filipino girlfriend of
who marry aliens shall retain their citizenship, Peter Go opposed the petition claiming that Lily
unless by their act or omission they are deemed, Teh was still a minor who had not even celebrated
under the law to have renounced it." (Sec. 4, Art. her 21st birthday, who never resided in the
IV, Constitution). Her residing in Kongo and Philippines except during her one-week visit as
acquiring a Kongo passport are indicative of her tourist from Taipeh during the Chinese New Year,
renunciation of Philippine citizenship, which iswho a spoke only Chinese, and who had radical
ground for loss of her citizenship which she was ideas liked advocating unification of Taiwan with
supposed to have retained. When she ran mainland for China. Lily Teh, however, swore that she
Governor of Sorsogon, Zeny was no longerwas a renouncing her Chinese allegiance and while
Philippine citizen and, hence, was disqualified shefor knew no Filipino customs and traditions as yet,
said position. she evinced a sincere desire to learn and embrace
them. Would Lily Teh succeed in becoming a
Filipino citizen through her marriage to Peter Go?
2) Although under Section 11(1), Article XVI ofExplain.
the
Constitution, mass media must be wholly owned by
Filipino citizens and under Section 2 of the Anti-
Dummy Law aliens may not intervene in the SUGGESTED ANSWER:
management of any nationalized business activity. Yes, Lily Teh ipso facto became a Philippine
Zeny may be elected vice president of the Philippinecitizen upon her marriage to Peter Go, who is a
Bulletin, because she has remained a Filipino Philippine citizen, provided she possesses none of
citizen. Under Section 4, Article IV of the thedisqualifications laid down in Section 4 of the
Constitution, Filipino citizens who marry aliens Revised Naturalization Law. According to to the
retains their citizenship unless by their actruling or in Moy Ya Lim Yao vs. Commissioner of
omission they are deemed, under the law, to have Immigration, 41 SCRA 292, an alien woman who
renounced it. The acts or omission which will resultmarries a Filipino husband ipso facto becomes a
in loss of citizenship are enumerated Filipino in citizen without having to possess any of
Commonwealth Act No, 63. Zeny is not guilty of the any qualifications prescribed in Section 2 of the
of them. As held in Kawakita vs. United States, Revised
343 Naturalization Law provided she
U.S. 717, a person who possesses dual citizenship possesses none of the disqualifications set forth in
like Zeny may exercise rights of citizenship in bothSection 4 of the same law. All of the grounds
countries and the use of a passport pertaining invoked
to by the former girlfriend of Peter Go for
one country does not result in loss of citizenship opposing
in the petition of Lily Teh, except for the
the other country. last one, are qualifications, which Lily Teh need
not possess. The fact that Lily Teh is advocating
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: the unification of Taiwan with mainland China is
Neither, was Zeny qualified to hold the position ofnot a ground
SUGGESTED ANSWER: under Section 4 of
for disqualification
vice-president of Philippine Bulletin. Under the the1) Under Section
Revised 4, Article Law.
Naturalization IV of the Constitution.
Constitution, "the ownership and management ofZeny retained her Filipino citizenship. Since she
mass media shall be limited to citizens, of the also became a citizen of Kongo, she possesses
Philippines, or to corporation, cooperatives or dual citizenship.
Effect of Oath of Allegiance
Pursuant to Section(2004)
40 (d) of the
associations wholly owned and managed by such (4-a)Government
Local TCA, a Filipina medical
Code, she istechnologist, leftrun
disqualified to in
citizens" (Section XI [1], Art. XVI), Being a non- for1975 to work
governor. Ininaddition,
ZOZ State. In 1988
if Zeny she to
returned married
the
Philippine citizen, Zeny can ODH, a citizen
Philippines, of ZOZ.
less than Pursuant
a year to ZOZ's
immediately law,
before
by taking an oath of allegiance, she
acquired her husband's citizenship. ODH died in Effect of Repatriation (2002)
2001, leaving her financially secured. She No I - A was born in the Philippines of Filipino
returned home in 2002, and sought elective office parents. When martial law was declared in the
in 2004 by running for Mayor of APP, her Philippines on September 21, 1972, he went to the
hometown. Her opponent sought to have her United States and was naturalized as an American
disqualified because of her ZOZ citizenship. Shecitizen. After the EDSA Revolution, he came home
replied that although she acquired ZOZ's to the Philippines and later on reacquired Philippine
citizenship because of marriage, she did not lose citizenship by repatriation. Suppose in the May
her Filipino citizenship. Both her parents, she 2004 elections he is elected Member of the House
said, are Filipino citizens. Is TCA qualified to runof Representatives and a case is filed seeking his
for Mayor? (5%) disqualification on the ground that he is not a
natural-born citizen of the Philippines, how should
SUGGESTED ANSWER: the case against him be decided? Explain your
On the assumption that TCA took an oath answer. of (5%)
allegiance to ZOZ to acquire the citizenship of
her husband, she is not qualified to run for SUGGESTED ANSWER:
mayor. She did not become a citizen of ZOZThe case should be decided in favor of A. As held
merely by virtue of her marriage, she also tookIn Bengson v. House of Representatives
an oath of allegiance to ZOZ. By this act, she lostElectoral Tribunal, 357 SCRA 545 (2001),
her Philippine citizenship. (Section 1 [3],repatriation results in the recovery of the original
Commonwealth Act No. 63.) nationality. Since A was a natural-born Filipino
citizen before he became a naturalized American
Effect of Repatriation (1999) citizen, he was restored to his former status as a
No III - B. Julio Hortal was born of Filipinonatural-born Filipino when he repatriated.
parents. Upon reaching the age of majority, he
became a naturalized citizen in another country.
Later, he reacquired Philippine citizenship. Could Effect of Repatriation (2003)
Hortal regain his status as natural born Filipino No IV - Juan Cruz was born of Filipino parents in
citizen? Would your answer be the same whether 1960 in Pampanga. In 1985, he enlisted in the
he reacquires his Filipino-citizenship U.S. Marine Corps and took an oath of allegiance
by
repatriation or by act of Congress? Explain. (3%) to the United States of America. In 1990, he was
naturalized as an American citizen. In 1994, he
FIRST ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: was repatriated under Republic Act No. 2430.
Julian Mortal can regain his status as a natural During the 1998 National Elections, he ran for
born citizen by repatriating. Since repatriation and was elected representative of the First
involves restoration of a person to citizenship District of Pampanga where he resided since his
previously lost by expatriation and Julian Mortal repatriation. Was he qualified to run for the
was previously a natural born citizen, in case he position? Explain.
repatriates he will be restored to his status as a SUGGESTED ANSWER:
natural born citizen. If he reacquired his citizenshipCruz was qualified to run as representative of the
by an act of Congress, Julian Hortal will not be First a District of Pampanga. Since his parents were
natural born citizen, since he reacquired his Filipino citizens, he was a natural-born citizen.
citizenship by legislative naturalization. Although he became a naturalized American
citizen, under the ruling in Bengson v. House of
Representatives Electoral Tribunal. 357 SCRA
SECOND ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: 545 [2001], by virtue of his repatriation, Cruz was
Julian Hortal cannot regain his status as a naturalrestored to his original status as a natural-born
born citizen by repatriating. He had to performFilipino citizen.
an act to acquire his citizenship, i.e., repatriation.
Under Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution, Effects of Marriages (1999)
natural born citizens are those who are citizens No III- What are the effects of marriages of:
from birth without having to perform an act to 1a citizen to an alien; (1%)
acquire or perfect their citizenship. If he an alien to a citizen; on their spouses and
reacquired his citizenship by an act of Congress, children? Discuss. (1%)
Julian Hortal will not be a natural born citizen
since he reacquired his citizenship by legislative
naturalization.
omission they are deemed, under the law, to
have renounced it. Elected Official (1992)
No. 16: Edwin Nicasio, born in the Philippines of
2) According to Mo Ya Lim Yao v. CommissionerFilipino parents and raised in the province of
of Immigration, 41 SCRA 292, under Section 15 ofNueva Ecija, ran for Governor of his home
the Revised Naturalization Law, a foreign womanprovince. He won and he was sworn into office. It
who marries a Filipino citizen becomes a Filipinowas recently revealed, however, that Nicasio is a
citizen provided she possesses none of thenaturalized American citizen. a) Does he still
disqualifications for naturalization. A foreign manpossess Philippine citizenship? b) If the second-
who marries a Filipino citizen does not acquireplacer in the gubernatorial
Philippine citizenship. However, under Section elections
3 files a quo warranto suit against
of the Revised Naturalization Act, in such a Nicasio
case and he is found to be disqualified
from
the residence requirement for naturalization will be office, can the second-placer be sworn
reduced from ten (10) to five (5) years. Underinto office as governor? c) If, instead, Nicasio
Section 1(2), Article IV of the Constitution, thehad been born (of the
children of an alien and a Filipino citizensame are set of parents) in the United States
citizens of the Philippines. and he thereby acquired American
citizenship by birth, would your answer be
different? SUGGESTED ANSWER: a) No, Nicasio
Effects of Philippine Bill of 1902 (2001) no longer possesses Philippine citizenship. As held
No I - From mainland China where he was born in Frivaldo vs. COMELEC, 174 SCRA 245, by
of Chinese parents, Mr Nya Tsa Chan migrated becoming a naturalized American citizen, Nicasio
to the Philippines in 1894. As of April 11, 1899,lost his Philippine citizenship. Under Section 1(1) of
he was already a permanent resident of the Commonwealth Act No. 63, Philippine citizenship is
Philippine Islands and continued to reside in this
lost by naturalization in a foreign country,
country until his death. During his lifetime and
when he was already in the Philippines, Mr. Nya
Tsa Chan married Charing, a Filipina, with whom
he begot one son, Hap Chan, who was born on
October 18. 1897. Hap Chan got married also tob) 2nd placer can’t be sworn to office...
Nimfa, a Filipina, and one of their children was
Lacqui Chan who was born on September 27,c) If Nicasio was born in the United States, he
1936. Lacqui Chan finished the course Bachelorwould still be a citizen of the Philippines, since his
of Science in Commerce and eventually engagedparents are Filipinos. Under Section 1(2), those
in business. whose fathers or mothers are citizens of the
Philippines are citizens of the Philippines. Nicasio
In the May 1989 election, Lacqui Chan ran forwould and possess dual citizenship, since under
was elected Representative (Congressman). HisAmericanrival Law persons born in the United States
candidate, Ramon Deloria, filed a quo warranto areorAmerican citizens. As held in Aznor vs.
disqualification case against him on the groundCOMELEC.
that 185 SCRA 703, a person who
he was not a Filipino citizen. It was pointed out in
possesses both Philippine and American
particular, that Lacqui Chan did not elect Philippine
citizenship is still a Filipino and does not lose his
citizenship upon reaching the age of 21. Philippine citizenship unless he renounces it.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The citizenship requirement is to be possessed by
an elective official at the latest as of the time he is
proclaimed and at the start of the term of office to
which he has been elected. Section 39 of the
Local Government Code, which enumerates the
qualifications of elective local government officials,
does not specify any particular date or time when
the candidate must possess citizenship. (Frivaldo
v. COMELEC,
G.R. No. 120295, June 28,1996)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Under Section 39 of the Local Government
Code, an individual must possess the residency
requirement in the locality where he intends to
run at least one year immediately preceding the
day of election.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) T, the losing candidate, should question the
election of Y before the Senate Electoral Tribunal, "In other words, the tax amnesty does not have
.... the effect of obliterating his lack of good moral
character and irreproachable conduct which
(2) Yes, Y is a Filipino citizen. More than that he are grounds for denaturalization,"
is a natural born citizen of the Philippines
qualified to become a Senator. Since Y is an Residency Requirements; Elective Official
illegitimate child of a Filipino mother, he follows (Q9-2005)
the citizenship of his mother. He need not elect (1) In the May 8,1995 elections for local
Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of officials whose terms were to commence on June
majority as held In re Mallare. 59 SCRA 45. In 30, 1995, Ricky filed on March 20, 1995 his
Osias v. Antonino, Electoral Case No. 11, August certificate of candidacy for the Office of Governor
6, 1971, the Senate Electoral Tribunal held that of Laguna. He won, but his qualifications as an
the illegitimate child of an alien father and a elected official was questioned. It is admitted that
Filipino mother is a Filipino citizen and is qualified
to be a Senator.
lawfully married just two years ago. Is Miguel Sin Status; Illegitimate Child; Dual Citizenship
a Filipino citizen? (1996)
SUGGESTED ANSWER: No. 8: 2) X was born in the United States of a
Miguel Sin is a Filipino citizen because he is theFilipino father and a Mexican mother. He returned
legitimate child of a Filipino mother. Under Articleto the Philippines when he was twenty-six years
IV, Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution, his motherof age, carrying an American passport and he
retained her Philippine citizenship despite herwas registered as an alien with the Bureau of
marriage to an alien husband, and according toImmigration.
Article IV, Section 1(2) of the 1987 Constitution,
children born of a Filipino mother are FilipinoWas X qualified to run for membership in the
citizens. House of Representatives in the 1995 elections?
Explain.
Ways of Reacquiring Citizenship (2000) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No XVIII. - Cruz, a Filipino by birth, became an Whether or not X was qualified to run for
American citizen. In his old age he has returned membership in the House of Representatives in the
to the country and wants to become a Filipino 1995 election depends on the circumstances.
again. As his lawyer, enumerate the ways by
which citizenship may be reacquired. (2%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER: If X was an Illegitimate child, he is not qualified to
Cruz may reacquire Philippine citizenship in the run for the House of Representatives. According
following ways: to the case of in re Mallare, 59 SCRA 45, an
1By naturalization; illegitimate child follows the citizenship of the
By repatriation pursuant to Republic Act No. 8171;mother.
and Since the mother of X is a Mexican, he
By direct act of Congress (Section 2 of will be a Mexican citizen if he is an illegitimate
Commonwealth Act No. 63). child, even if his father is a Filipino.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
If X has taken an oath of allegiance to the U.S. he
will be deemed to have renounced his Philippine
citizenship. Consequently, he is disqualified to run
for the House of Representatives.
Should BART refund to the government the With whose contention do you agree, that of the
salaries and allowances he had received as Federal Party or that of Representative X? Why?
Congressman? (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
What will happen to the bills that BART alone I agree with the contention of Representative X. As
authored and were approved by the House of held In Bondoc v. Pineda, 201 SCRA 792 (1991),
Representatives while he was seated as the members of the House of Representatives
Congressman? Reason and explain briefly. (5%) Electoral Tribunal are entitled to security of tenure
like members of the judiciary. Membership in it may
not be terminated except for a just cause. Disloyalty
SUGGESTED ANSWER: AVE cannot collect to party is not a valid ground for the expulsion of a
salaries and allowances from the government for member of the House of Representatives Electoral
the first two years of his term, because in the Tribunal. Its members must discharge their
meanwhile BART collected the salaries and functions with impartiality and
allowances. BART
independence from the political party to which
they belong. agreement must be concurred in by at least two-
thirds of all the Members of the Senate.
Electoral Tribunal; Senate; Jurisdiction (1990)
Section 4, Article XVIII of the Constitution
No. 3: Y was elected Senator in the May 1987 provides: "All existing treaties or international
national elections. He was born out of wedlock in agreements which have not been ratified shall not
1949 of an American father and a naturalized be renewed or extended without the concurrence
Filipina mother. Y never elected Philippine of at least two-thirds of all the Members of the
citizenship upon reaching the age of majority. Senate.”
Before what body should T, the losing
candidate, question the election of Y? Investigations in Aid of Legislation (1992)
State the reasons for your answer. Is Y a No. 8: A case was filed before the Sandiganbayan
Filipino citizen? Explain your answer. regarding a questionable government transaction.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: In the course of the proceedings, newspapers
(1) T, the losing candidate, should question the linked the name of Senator J. de Leon to the
election of Y before the Senate Electoral Tribunal, scandal.
because the issue involved is the qualification of
Y to be a Senator. Section 17, Article VI of the Senator de Leon took the floor of the Senate to
1987 Constitution provides that. The Senate and speak on a "matter of personal privilege" to
the House of Representatives shall each-have anvindicate his honor against those "baseless and
Electoral Tribunal which shall be the sole judge ofmalicious" allegations. The matter was referred to
all contests relating to the election, returns, and the Committee on Accountability of Public
qualifications of their respective Members." Officers, which proceeded to conduct a legislative
inquiry. The Committee asked Mr. Vince
Ledesma, a businessman linked to the transaction
(2) Yes, Y is a natural born Filipino citizen. .... and now a respondent before the Sandiganbayan,
to appear and to testify before the Committee.
On the other hand, a multi-party system may (1) There is a war or other national emergency:
make it difficult to obtain a stable and workable (2) The grant of emergency powers must be for
majority, since probably no party will get a a limited period;
majority. Likewise, the opposition will be(3) The grant of emergency powers is subject to
weakened if there are several minority parties. such restrictions as Congress may prescribe; and
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) The President is correct. Under Presidential
Decree No. 360, the grade of four-star general is
conferred only upon the Chief of Staff. Hence, the
appointment of Renato de Silva as a four-star
general must be deemed to carry with it his
appointment as Chief of Staff of the AFP,
Pardoning Power; Amnesty (1993) 3. The Solicitor General argues that, in any
No 20: - The National Unification Commissionevent, the determination of whether the rebellion
has recommended the grant of absolute andposes danger to public safety involves a question
unconditional amnesty to all rebels. There is theof fact and the Supreme Court is not a trier of
view that it is not necessary for the rebels tofacts. What should be the ruling of the Court?
admit the commission of the crime charged, it(2.5%)
being enough that the offense falls within the SUGGESTED ANSWER:
scope of the amnesty proclamation following the Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of
doctrine laid down in Barrioquinto vs. Fernandez,justice to settle actual controversies involving
82 Phil. 642. In other words, admission of guilt rights
is which are legally demandable and
not a condition sine qua non for the availment ofenforceable, and to determine whether or not there
amnesty. Is this correct? Explain. has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any
SUGGESTED ANSWER: branch or instrumentality of the Government (Art.
The view that it is not necessary for rebels to Vin, Sec. 1, par. 2,1987 Constitution). When the
admit the commission of the crime charged in grant of power is qualified, conditional or subject to
order to avail themselves of the benefits of limitations, the issue of whether the prescribed
amnesty is not correct. As stated in Vera v. qualifications or conditions have been met or the
People, 7 SCRA 156, the doctrine laid down in limitations respected, is justiciable — the problem
Borrioquinto vs. Fernandez, 82 Phil. 642 has being one of legality or validity, not its wisdom.
been overturned. Amnesty presupposes the
commission of a crime. It is inconsistent for
someone to seek for forgiveness for a crime
which he denies having committed. (People vs.Article VII, Section 18 of the 1987 Constitution
Pasilan, 14 SCRA 694). specifically grants the Supreme Court the power
to review, in an appropriate proceeding filed by
Pardoning Power; Amnesty (1995) any citizen, the sufficiency of the factual basis of
No. 5: Lucas, a ranking member of the NDF, wasthe proclamation of martial law. Thus, in the
captured by policemen while about to board amatter of such declaration, two conditions must
passenger bus bound for Sorsogon. Chargedconcur: (1) there must be an actual invasion or
with rebellion he pleaded not guilty whenrebellion; and (2) public safety must require it.
arraigned. Before trial he was granted absoluteThe Supreme Court cannot renege on its
pardon by the President to allow him toconstitutional duty to determine whether or not
participate in the peace talks between thethe said factual conditions exist (IBP v. Zamora,
government and the communist rebels. G.R. No. 141284, August 15, 2000).
3. Instead of a pardon, may the President grant 4. Finally, the Solicitor General maintains
the accused amnesty if favorably recommended that the President reported to Congress such
by the National Amnesty Commission? Explain. proclamation of Martial Law, but Congress did not
revoke the proclamation. What is the effect of the
4. May the accused avail of the benefits of inaction of Congress on the suit brought by
amnesty despite the fact the he continued to Robert to the Supreme Court? (2.5%)
SUGGESTED
profess innocence?
ANSWER:
Explain.
The Supreme Court should rule that his deter- SUGGESTED ANSWER:
mination is not conclusive upon the courts. The The inaction of Congress has no effect on the
1987 Constitution allows a citizen, in an suit brought by Robert to the Supreme Court as
appropriate proceeding, to file a petition Article VIII, Section 18 provides for checks on
questioning the sufficiency of the factual basis of the President's power to declare martial law to
said proclamation. Moreover, the power to be exercised separately by Congress and the
when arraigned. Before trial he was granted
absolute pardon by the President to allow him to 4. No, the accused cannot avail of the benefits of
participate in the peace talks between the inamnesty
criminalifcases,
he continues
it wouldtohave
profess
beenhis innocence.
unnecessary
government and the communist rebels. In Vera vs. People, 7 SCRA 152. since
to exclude impeachment cases from this scope. amnesty If
(1) Is the pardon of the President valid? presupposes the commission of a crime.
the President can grant pardons in criminal cases, It is
Explain. inconsistent
with for an
more reason he accused
can granttoexecutive
seek forgiveness
(2) Assuming that the pardon is valid, can Lucas clemency
for something which he claims
in administrative cases, which he are
haslessnot
reject it? Explain. committed.
serious.
(e) The membership of the President of the (4) Cases heard by a division when the
Philippine Chamber of Commerce may also be required majority is not obtained;
upheld on the ground that Congress has the
power to prescribe qualifications for the office. (5) Cases where a doctrine or principle of law
previously laid down will be modified or reversed;
Suspension of Writ of Habeas Corpus (1997)
(a) When may the privilege of the writ of habeas (6) Administrative cases against judges when
corpus be suspended? the penalty is dismissal; and
(b) If validly declared, what would be the full
consequences of such suspension? (7) Election contests for President or Vice-
President.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) Under Section 16, Article VII of the
Constitution, the privilege of the writ of habeas
corpus may be suspended when there is an
invasion or rebellion and public safety requires it.
(2) The RTC decision, having become final and Political Question (1995)
executory, can it still be vacated? No. 13: Judicial power as defined in Sec. 1, 2nd
par., Art. VIII, 1987 Constitution, now "includes the
SUGGESTED ANSWER: duty of the Courts of Justice to settle actual
1} As held in Estate Developers and Investorscontroversies involving rights which are legally
Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 213 SCRA 353,demandable and enforceable, and to determine
pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 1344, it iswhether or not there has been a grave abuse of
the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Boarddiscretion amounting to lack of excess of
which has jurisdiction over the claim of ajurisdiction on the part of any branch or
developer against a buyer for the payment of theinstrumentality of the Government. "This definition
balance of the purchase price of a lot. Theis said to have expanded the power of the
jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Court over casesjudiciary to include political questions formerly
in which the amount of controversy exceedsbeyond its jurisdiction.
P20,000.00 exists only in all cases where the
case does not otherwise fall within the exclusive (1) Do you agree with such as interpretation of the
jurisdiction of any other court, tribunal, person constitutional
or definition of judicial power that would
body exercising Judicial or quasi-judicial authorize the courts to review and, if warranted,
functions, reverse the exercise of discretion by the political
departments (executive and legislative) of the
2) Yes, because it is void.... government, including the Constitutional
Commissions? Discuss fully,
Mandatory Period For Deciding Cases (1989) (2) In your opinion, how should such definition be
No. 10: (2) Despite the lapse of 4 months from construed so as not to erode considerably or
the time that the trial was terminated and the disregard entirely the existing "political question"
case submitted for decision, the trial court failed doctrine? Discuss fully.
to decide the case. The defense counsel moved
to dismiss the case on the ground that after the
lapse of 90 days, the court had lost jurisdiction to SUGGESTED ANSWER:
decide the case. Should the motion be granted? 1. Yes, the second paragraph of Section 1,
Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution has
SUGGESTED ANSWER: expanded the power of the Judiciary to
No, the motion should not be granted. Section 15 include political questions. This was not found
(4), Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution provides: in the 1935 and the 1973 Constitution,
Jurisdiction
Precisely, of HLURB
the framers (1993)
of the 1987 constitution
"Despite the expiration of the applicable No. intended
8; The to ABC Realty,
widen Inc, filed
the scope a complaint
of judicial review.
mandatory period, the court, without prejudice against
As pointed Rico
out inforMarcos
the vs. collection
Manglapus, of 177unpaid
to such responsibility as may have been installments
SCRA 668, so onasa subdivision
not to disregardlot purchased
entirely the by the
incurred in consequence thereof, shall decide political
latter, Rico failed doctrine,
question to file anthe answer,
extentwas declared
of judicial
or resolve the case or matter submitted in default;
review and after
when political reception
questions of plaintiffs
are involved
thereto for determination, without further evidence
should ex parte,
be limited judgment was
to a determination rendered
of whether or
delay." not
against
therehim.
hasThebeen decision
a gravebecame
abuse offinal,
discretion
and upon
amounting
motion by ABC to lackRealty,
or excessthe judge
of jurisdiction
issued aonwrit theof
Thus, the failure of the trial court to decide thepart of the official whose act is being questioned.
execution.
case within ninety days did not oust it ofIf grave abuse of discretion is not shown, the
jurisdiction to decide the case. Rico now
courts files not
should a motion
substituteto quash the writ and
their judgment fortothat
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: vacate
of the Judgment
the official concerned contending
and decide thata itmatter
is the
The 1973 Constitution provided for certain Housing
which by and Land Use
its nature or byRegulatory Board
law is for the latter alone
consequences on the decisions of courts in case to (HLURB)
decide.which is vested with original and
of the failure of the Supreme Court and other exclusive Jurisdiction over cases involving the
inferior collegiate courts to decide cases within real estate business. Rico prays for the dismissal
prescribed periods. But it did not provide for of the complaint and for the nullity of the decision.
consequences on the decisions of trial courts as The realty firm opposes the
a result of their failure to decide cases
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The assault of a fellow Senator constitutes
Section 1, Article VIII of the Constitution hasdisorderly behavior.
expanded the scope of judicial power by including
the duty of the courts of Justice to settle actual Political Question; To Settle Actual
controversies involving rights which are legally Controversies (2004)
demandable and enforceable, and to determine(a) The 1935, 1973 and 1987 Constitutions
whether or not there has been a grave abuse ofcommonly provide that "Judicial power shall be
discretion amounting to lack or excess ofvested in one Supreme Court and in such lower
jurisdiction on the part of any branch orcourts as may be established by law."
instrumentality of the Government. In Marcos vs.
Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668, the Supreme CourtWhat is the effect of the addition in the 1987
stated that because of this courts of justice mayConstitution of the following provision: "Judicial
decide political questions if there was grave abusepower includes the duty of the courts of justice to
of discretion amounting to lack or excess ofsettle actual controversies involving rights which
jurisdiction on the part of the official whose actionare legally demandable and enforceable, and to
is being questioned. determine whether or not there has been grave
abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess
of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or
Political Question: Separation of Powersinstrumentality of the government"? Discuss
(2004) briefly, citing at least one illustrative case. (5%)
(b) SDO was elected Congressman. Before the SUGGESTED ANSWER:
end of his first year in office, he inflicted physical
The effect of the second paragraph of Section 1,
injuries on a colleague, ET, in the course of Articlea VIII of the 1987 Constitution is to limit
heated debate. Charges were filed in court against resort to the political question doctrine and to
him as well as in the House Ethics Committee. broaden the scope of judicial inquiry into areas
Later, the House of Representatives, dividing which the Judiciary, under the previous
along party lines, voted to expel him. Claiming thatConstitutions, would have left to the political
his expulsion was railroaded and tainted by departments to decide. If a political question is
bribery, he filed a petition seeking a declaration by
involved, the Judiciary can determine whether or
the Supreme Court that the House gravely abused not the official whose action is being questioned
its discretion and violated the Constitution. He acted with grave abuse of discretion amounting to
prayed that his expulsion be annulled and that he lack or excess of jurisdiction (Marcos v.
should be restored by the Speaker to his position Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 [1989]); (Daza v.
as Congressman. Is SDO's petition before the Singson, 180 SCRA 496 [1989]). Thus, although
Supreme Court justiciable? Cite pertinent issues the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal
for consideration. (5%) has exclusive jurisdiction to decide election
contests involving members of the House of
Representatives, the Supreme Court nullified the
SUGGESTED ANSWER: removal of one of its members for voting in favor
While under Section 1, Article VIII of the 1987 of the protestant, who belonged to a different
Constitution the Supreme Court may inquire party. (Bondoc v. Pineda, 201 SCRA 792 [1991]).
whether or not the decision to expel SDO is
tainted with grave abuse of discretion amounting
to lack or excess of jurisdiction, the petition should Political Questions (1988)
be dismissed. In Alejandrino v. Quezon (46 Phil.No. 23: In accordance with the opinion of the
83 [1924]), the Supreme Court held that it couldSecretary of Justice, and believing that it would
not compel the Senate to reinstate a Senator whobe good for the country, the President enters into
assaulted another Senator and was suspended foran agreement with the Americans for an
disorderly behavior, because it could not compel aextension for another five (5) years of their stay
separate and co-equal department to take anyat their military bases in the Philippines, in
particular action. In Osmeña v. Pendatun (109consideration of:
Phil. 863 [1960]), it was held that the Supreme
Court could not interfere with the suspension of a(1) A yearly rental of one billion U.S. dollars,
Congressman for disorderly behavior, because thepayable to the Philippine government in advance;
House of Representatives is the judge of what(2) An undertaking
Political on the
Question part of the
Doctrine American
(1997)
constitutes disorderly behavior. government
No. 5; To whatto implement
extent, ifimmediately
at all, has the
themini-
1987
Marshall plan affected
Constitution for the country
the involving
"political question
doctrine"?
ten billion U.S. dollars in aids andNo. 11: How may the following be removed from
concessional loans; and office: 1) Senators & Congressmen 2) Judges of
(3) An undertaking to help persuade Americanlower courts 3) Officers and employees in the
banks to condone interests and other charges onCivil Service
the country's out-standing loans.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) As to Sen & Cong, Art. III, section 16(3), of
In return, the President agreed to allow Americanthe Constitution, ... 2) Under Art. VIII, sec. 11 of
nuclear vessels to stay for short visits at Subic,the Constitution, Judges of lower courts may be
and in case of vital military need, to store nuclearremoved by dismissal by the Supreme by a vote
weapons at Subic and at Clark Field. A vitalof a majority of the Members who actually took
military need comes, under the agreement, whenpart in the deliberation on the issues in the case
the sealanes from the Persian Gulf to the Pacific,and voted thereon. 3) As to Civ Service Empl,
are threatened by hostile military forces. Art. IX-B. Sec. 2(3) of the Constitution, ...
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Votes required for declaring a law
unconstitutional (1996)
No. 7: Can five members of the Supreme Court
declare a municipal ordinance unconstitutional?
ARTICLE IX Civil Service
Explain. Commission
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Yes. five Members of the Supreme Court sitting en- Career Service; Characteristics (1999)
banc can declare a municipal ordinance No IX - What characterizes the career service
unconstitutional. Under Section 4(2). Article VIII of
and what are included in the career service?
the Constitution, a municipal ordinance can be (2%)
declared unconstitutional with the concurrence of a SUGGESTED ANSWER:
majority of the Members of the Supreme Court who According to Section 7, Chapter 2, Title I, Book V
actually took part in the deliberation on the issuesof the Administrative Code of 1987, the career
in the case and voted thereon. If only eight service is characterized by
Members of the Supreme Court actually took part (1) Entrance based on merit and fitness to be
in deciding the case, there will still be a quorum.determined as far as practicable by competitive
Five Members will constitute a majority of those examination or based on highly technical
who actually took part in deciding the case. qualifications;
(2) opportunity for advancement to higher career
positions; and
(3) security of tenure.
ARTICLE IX Constitutional
The career service includes:
Commissions Rotational (1) OPEN CAREER POSITIONS for
Scheme (1999) appointment to which prior qualifications in an
No XIII - What are the requisites for the effective In order examination
appropriate that a taxpayer may have standing to
is required;
operation of the so-called "Rotational Scheme" forchallenge
(2) CLOSED theCAREER
legality POSITIONS
of an officialwhich act of
arethe
Constitutional Commissions? (2%) government, the technical
scientific or highly act being questioned must
in nature;
involve
(3) a disbursement
Positions in the CAREER of public funds upon the
EXECUTIVE
SUGGESTED ANSWER: theory that the expenditure of public funds for an
SERVICE;
As held in Republic v. Imperial, 96 Phil. 770, for
(4)unconstitutional
Career officers actotheris than
a misapplication of such
those in the career
the effective operation of the rotational scheme of funds, which
executive maywho
service, be enjoined at the by
are appointed instance
the of a
the Constitutional Commission, the first taxpayer.
President;
Commissioner should start on a common date (5) Commissioned officers and enlisted men of
and any vacancy before the expiration of the term the Armed
Term ofForces;
Office; Justices (1996)
should be filled only for the unexpired balance of(6)
No.Personnel
9: A, an of associate
government justice of the
-owned or Supreme
the term. Court reached
controlled the agewhether
corporations, of seventy on July 1,
performing
1996. Thereor was
governmental a case
proprietary calendared
functions, for
who do not
Constitutional Commissions & Council (Q7- fall deliberation
under theon that day service;
non-career where the andvote of A was
2006) crucial. Can A hold over the position and
2. The legislature may abolish this body: (5%)
(7)participate
Permanent in the deliberation
laborers, whether of skilled,
the case on July
Commission on Appointments 1, 1996? Explain.
semiskilled, or unskilled.
Ombudsman SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Judicial and Bar Council No. A cannot hold over his position as Associate
Court of Tax Appeals Justice of the Supreme Court and participate in
Commission on Audit the deliberations of the case on July 1, 1996.
Under Section 11, Article VIII of the Constitution,
Members of the Supreme Court hold office until
SUGGESTED ANSWER: they reach the age of seventy years or become
The legislature may abolish the d) COURT OFincapacitated to discharge their duties.
TAX APPEALS since it is merely a creation ofConstitutional officers whose terms are fixed by
law unlike the Commission on Appointments,the Constitution have no right to hold over their
Ombudsman, Judicial and Bar Council andpositions until their successors shall have been
Commission on Audit which are all constitutionalappointed and qualified unless otherwise
creations. Thus, the latter agencies may only beprovided in the Constitution. (Mechem, A Treaties
abolished by way of an amendment or revision ofon the Law of Public Offices and Officers, p. 258.)
the Constitution.
which ruled that the amounts due are the 1The rule prohibiting the appointment to certain
personal liabilities of the former Governor who government positions, of the spouse and relatives
dismissed the employees in bad faith. Thus, ADSof the President within the fourth degree of
refused to pay. The final CSC decision, however,consanguinity or affinity. [2%]
did not find the former Governor in bad faith. TheThe rule making it incompatible for members of
former Governor was likewise not heard on the Congress to hold offices or employment in the
question of his liability. government. [2%]
The rule prohibiting members of the Constitutional
Is ADS' refusal justified? Can COA disallow the Commissions, during their tenure, to be financially
payment of backwages by ADS to the dismissed interested in any contract with or any franchise or
employees due under a final CSC decision? privilege granted by the government, [2%]
Decide and reason briefly. (5%) The rule providing for post audit by the COA of
certain government agencies. [2%]
SUGGESTED ANSWER: The rule requiring Congress to provide for the
A. The refusal of ADS is not justified, and standardization
the of compensation of government
Commission on Audit cannot disallow the payment officials and employees. [2%]
of backwages by ADS to the dismissed employee.
The Commission on Audit cannot make a ruling that
it is the former governor who should be personally
liable, since the former governor was not given the
opportunity to be heard. In addition, the Commission
on Audit cannot set aside a final decision of the Civil
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Service Commission. The payment of backwages to
illegally dismissed government employee is1Section
not an 13. Article VII of the Constitution, which
irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant or the President from appointing his spouse and
prohibits
unconscionable expenditure. (Uy v. Commission relativeson within the fourth degree of consanguinity or
Audit, 328 SCRA 607 [2000]). affinity does not distinguish between government
corporations with original charters and their
subsidiaries, because the prohibition applies to both.
2Section 13, Article VII of the Constitution, which
Function of CSC (1994) prohibits Members of Congress from holding any other
No. 15 - 2) Can the Civil Service Commission office during their term without forfeiting their seat,
revoke an appointment by the appointing power does not distinguish between government
and direct the appointment of an individual of its
corporations with original charters and their
choice? subsidiaries, because the prohibition applies to both.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Section 2, Article IX-A of the Constitution, which
According to the ruling in Medalla vs. Sto. Tomas,
prohibits Members of the Constitutional Commissions
208 SCRA 351, the Civil Service Commission from being financially interested in any contract with or
cannot dictate to the appointing power whom anytofranchise or privilege granted by the Government,
appoint. Its function is limited to determiningdoes not distinguish between government
whether or not the appointee meets the minimum corporations with original charters and their
qualification requirements prescribed forsubsidiaries,
the because the prohibition applies to both.
position. Otherwise, it would be encroaching Civil Service
Section Commission
2(1), Article vs.Constitution
IX-D of the COA (2004)which
(9-a) forFormer
upon the discretion of the appointing power. provides Governor
post audit by the PP of ADS Province
Commission on audit had
of
dismissed
government several employees
corporations, does not to scale down the
distinguish
operations
between of corporations
government his Office. withThe employees
original
GOCCs Without Original Charter vs. GOCCs complained
charters to subsidiaries,
and their the Merit Systems
becauseProtection Board,
the provision
With Original Charter (1998) which
applies ruled that the Civil Service rules were
to both.
No II.-- The Constitution distinguishes between violated
two
3Section when the
5, Article IX-Bemployees were dismissed.
of the Constitution, which The
types of owned and/or controlled corporations: Civil Service Commission
provides for the standardization of the (CSC) affirmed the
those with original charters and those which are MSPB decision, and ordered ADS to reinstate the
subsidiaries of such corporations. In which of the employees with full backwages. ADS did not
following rule/rules is such a distinction made? appeal and the order became final.
Consider each of the following items and explain
briefly your answer, citing pertinent provisions of
the Constitution. Instead of complying immediately, BOP, the
incumbent Governor of ADS, referred the matter
to the Commission on Audit (COA),
compensation of government officials memorandum-order,
and directs the corporation to
employees, distinguishes between government comply with Civil Service Rules in the
corporations and their subsidiaries, for appointment
the of all of its officers and employees.
provision applies only to government corporations
The memorandum-order of the CSC is assailed by
with original charters. the corporation, as well as by its officers and
employees, before the court. How should the case
be resolved?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Jurisdiction over the GOCCs (1999)
The memorandum-order of the Civil Service
No IX - Luzviminda Marfel, joined by eleven other
Commission should be declared void. As held in
retrenched employees, filed a complaint with the
Gamogamo v. PNOC Shipping and Transit
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) for
Corporation. 381 SCRA 742 (2002). under Article
unpaid retrenchment or separation pay,
IX-B, Section 2(1) of the 1987 Constitution
underpayment of wages and non-payment of
government-owned or controlled corporations
emergency cost of living allowance. The
organized under the Corporation Code are not
complaint was filed against Food Terminal, Inc.
covered by the Civil Service Law but by the Labor
Food Terminal Inc. moved to dismiss on the
Code, because only government-owned or
ground of lack of jurisdiction, theorizing that it is a
controlled corporations with original charters are
government-owned and controlled corporation and
covered by the Civil Service.
its employees are governed by the Civil Service
Law and not by the Labor Code. Marfel opposed
the motion to dismiss, contending that although
Modes of Removal from Office (1993)
Food Terminal, Inc. is a corporation owned and
No. 11: How may the following be removed from
controlled by the government earlier created and
office: 1) Senators & Congressmen 2) Judges of
organized under the general corporation law as
lower courts 3) Officers and employees in the
"The Greater Manila Food Terminal, Inc.", it has
Civil Service
still the marks of a private corporation: it directly
hires its employees without seeking approval from SUGGESTED ANSWER:
the Civil Service Commission and its personnel1) Senators, Cong., Art. III, section 16(3), of the
are covered by the Social Security System and notConstitution, ...
the Government Service Insurance System, The
question posed in the petition for certiorari 2)
at Judges,
bar is Art. VIII, sec. 11 of the Constitution,
whether or not a labor law claim against a
government-owned or controlled corporation like3) Under Art. IX-B. Sec. 2(3) of the Constitution,
the Food Terminal, Inc. falls within the jurisdictionofficers and employees in the Civil Service may
of the Department of Labor and Employment oronly be removed for cause as provided by law
the Civil Service Commission? Decide andand after observance of due process.
ratiocinate. (4%)
Their removal must be effected by the appropriate
disciplinary authority in accordance with Ch. 7
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
secs. 47-48 of Book V of the Administrative Code
The claim of the retrenched employees falls under
of 1987 and the Civil Service Rules and
the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations
Regulations.
Commission and not under the jurisdiction of the
Civil Service Commission. As held in Lumanta v.
Receiving of Indirect Compensation (1997)
National Labor Relations Commission, 170 SCRA
No. 18; A, while an incumbent Governor of his
79, since Food Terminal, Inc. was organized
province, was invited by the Government of
under the Corporation Law and was not created
Cambodia as its official guest. While there, the
by a special law in accordance with Section 2(1),
sovereign king awarded Governor A with a
Article IX-B of the Constitution, it is not covered by
decoration of honor and gifted him with a gold
the civil service.
ring of insignificant monetary value, both of which
he accepted.
Jurisdiction over the GOCCs (2003)
Was Governor A's acceptance of the decoration
No VII - A corporation, a holder of a certificate of
and gift violative of the Constitution?
registration issued by the Securities and Exchange
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Commission, is owned and controlled by the
Yes, it violated Section 8, Article IX-B of the
Republic of the Philippines. The Civil Service
Constitution. For his acceptance of the
Commission (CSC), in a
decoration of honor and the gold ring from the
Government of Cambodia to be valid, Governor
A should first obtain the consent of Congress.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1. I would invoke the resolution in Jose v. Arroyo,
G.R. No. 78435, Aug. 11, 1987, in which the
Supreme Court held that under Art. XVIII, sec, 16
of the Constitution, career service employees
may be removed "not for cause but as a result of
the reorganization pursuant to Proclamation No.
3 dated March 25, 1986 and the reorganization
following the ratification of this Constitution." By
virtue of this provision, it was held that the
reorganization of the Bureau of Customs under
Executive Order No, 127 may continue even after
the ratification of the Constitution, and career
service employees may be separated from the
service without cause as a result of such
reorganization.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) No need to expressly impose – they are
accessory penalties.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) No, A may not continue with his protest. Right to Vote; Jurisdiction (2001)
.... No II - Let us suppose that Congress enacted a
(2) No, A cannot ask that he be proclaimed law which amended the Omnibus Election Code
elected in place of B. The votes cast for B were (particularly Sections 138, 139, 142, 143) by
not invalid votes. Hence, A garnered only the vesting , in the COMELEC the jurisdiction over
second highest number of votes. Only the inclusion and exclusion cases filed by voters,
candidate who obtained the majority or plurality of instead of in the courts (MTC, then RTC). Is the
the votes is entitled to be proclaimed elected. On law valid or not, and why? (5%)
this ground, it was held in Labo v. COMELEC, SUGGESTED ANSWER:
176 SCRA 1, that the fact that the candidate whoThe law granting the COMELEC jurisdiction over
obtained the highest number of votes is not inclusion and exclusion cases is unconstitutional.
eligible does not entitle the candidate who Under Section 2(3), Article IXC of the Constitution,
obtained the second highest number of votes to the COMELEC cannot decide the right to vote,
be proclaimed the winner. which refers to the inclusion and exclusion of
voters. Under Section 2(6), Article IX-C of the
Judicial Review of Decisions (2001) Constitution, it can only file petitions in court for
No XVI - In an election protest involving the inclusion or exclusion of voters.
position of Governor of the Province of Laguna
between "A", the protestee, and "B", the
protestant, the First Division of the COMELEC Election Laws 2nd
rendered a decision upholding B's protest Placer Rule (2003)
No VIII - In the municipal mayoralty elections in
Can "A" file a petition for certiorari with the 1980, the candidate who obtained the highest
Supreme Court under Rule 65 of the Rules of number of votes was subsequently declared to
discharge the office of mayor. Under Section 44 ofb) If the second-placer in the gubematorial
the Local Government Code, it is the vice mayor elections files a quo warranto suit against Nicasio
who should succeed in case of permanent and he is found to be disqualified from office, can
vacancy in the office of the mayor. It is only when the second-placer be sworn into office as
the position of the vice mayor is also vacant that governor?
the member of the Sangguniang Bayan who c) If, instead, Nicasio had been born (of the
obtained the highest number of votes will succeed same set of parents) in the United States and he
to the office of mayor. thereby acquired American citizenship by birth,
would your answer be different?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1. According to Section 7, Article IX-A of the
1987 Constitution, the COMELEC shall decide
by a MAJORITY VOTE of all its members any
case or matter brought before it In Cua vs.
COMELEC, 156 SCRA582, the Supreme Court
stated that a two-to-one decision rendered by a
Division of the COMELEC and a three-to-two
decision rendered by the COMELEC en banc
was valid where only five members took part in
deciding the case.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2) According to Section 243 of the Omnibus
Election Code, the following issues can be
properly raised.
1The composition or proceedings of the board of
canvassers are illegal;
The canvassed election returns are incomplete, contain
material defects, approved to be tampered with, or
contain discrepancy in the same returns or in other
authenticated copies;
The election returns were prepared under duress, threats,
coercion, or intimidation, or they are obviously
manufactured or not authentic; and
Substitute or fraudulent returns in controverted
The following
polling have jurisdiction over election
places were canvassed, the results of which materiallycontests:
affected the standing of the aggrieved candidate or a) Barangay officials - Inferior Court;
candidates. b) Municipal officials -Regional Trial
Court;
c) Regional, provincial, and city officials
COMELEC (Section 2(2), Art. IX-C of
the Constitution);
d) Congressman -House of
Representatives Electoral Tribunal.
e) Senators - Senate Electoral Tribunal.
(Section 1. Article VI of the
Constitution);
f) President and Vice President -
Supreme Court (Section 4, Article VII of
the Constitution).
Yes, the vice mayor can continue to run as vice What is the effect, if any, of the privatization of
mayor. At the time that he filed his certificate of PNB on the audit Jurisdiction of the COA? (5%)
candidacy, the vice mayor ran for the same office SUGGESTED ANSWER:
he was holding. In determining whether a In accordance with the ruling in Philippine Airlines
candidate is running for a position other than the vs. Commission on Audit, 245 SCRA 39,(1995),
one he is holding in a permanent capacity and since the Philippine National Bank is no longer
should be considered resigned, it is the office he owned by the Government, the Commission on
was holding at the time he filed his certificate of Audit no longer has jurisdiction to audit it as an
candidacy should be considered. There is no legal institution. Under Section 2(2), Article IX-D of the
impediment to the vice mayor running as mayor to Constitution, it is government-owned or controlled
replace the vice mayor who died under Section 77 corporations and their subsidiaries which are
of the Omnibus Election Code, if a candidate dies subject to audit by the Commission on Audit.
However, in accordance with Section 2(1), Article
after the last day for filing certificates of candidacy,
he may be replaced by a person belonging to hisIX-D of the Constitution, the Commission on Audit
political party. However, it is required that he can audit the Philippine National Bank with respect
should first withdraw his Certificate of Candidacyto its accounts because the Government still has
for Vice-Mayor and file a new Certificate of equity in it.
Candidacy for Mayor.
COA; Money Claims (1998)
Vacancy; SB; Rule on Succession (2002) No I. - The Department of National Defense
No XV. A vacancy occurred in the sangguniang entered into a contract with Raintree Corporation
bayan of a municipality when X, a member, died. for the supply of ponchos to the Armed Forces of
X did not belong to any political party. the Philippines (AFP), stipulating that, in the event
of breach, action may be filed in the proper courts
To fill up the vacancy, the provincial governor in Manila.
appointed A upon the recommendation of the
sangguniang panlalawigan. On the other hand, Suppose the AFP fails to pay for delivered
for the same vacancy, the municipal mayor ponchos, where must Raintree Corporation file
appointed B upon the recommendation of the its claim? Why? [ 10%]
sangguniang bayan. Which of these SUGGESTED ANSWER:
appointments is valid? (5%) Raintree Corporation must file its claim with the
Commission on Audit, Under Section 2(1) IX-D
of the Constitution, the Commission on Audit has
the authority to settle all accounts pertaining to
expenditure of public funds. Raintree Corporation ARTICLE X Local Government
cannot file a case in court. The Republic of the Appointment of Budget Officer; control vs
Philippines did not waive its immunity from suit supervision (1999)
when it entered into the contract with Raintree No V - D. On May 17, 1988, the position of
Corporation for the supply of ponchos for the useProvincial Budget Officer of Province X became
of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. The vacant. Pedro Castahon, governor of the province,
contract involves the defense of the Philippines pursuant to Sec. 1 of E.O. No. 112, submitted the
and therefore relates to a sovereign function. names of three nominees for the aforesaid
position to the Department of Budget
Management (DBM), one of whom was that of
In United States vs. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487, 492, Marta Mahonhon. A month later, Castahon
the Supreme Court held; "The restrictive informed the DBM that Mahonhon had assumed
application of State immunity is proper only the office of PBO and requested that she be
when the proceedings arise out of commercial extended the appropriate appointment. The DBM
transactions of the foreign sovereign. Its Secretary appointed Josefa Kalayon instead.
commercial activities or economic affairs. Castahon protested the appointment of Kalayon
Stated differently, a State may be said to haveinsisting that it is he who had the right to choose
descended to the level of an individual and the PBO by submitting the names of his three
can thus be deemed to have tacitly given its nominees and Kalayon was not one of them. The
consent to be sued only when it enters into DBM countered that none of the governor's
business contracts. It does not apply where nominees have the necessary qualifications for
the contract relates to the exercise of its the position. Specifically, Mahonhon lacked the
sovereign functions. In this case the projects five-year experience in budgeting. Hence, the
are an integral part of the naval base which DBM
is was left with no alternative but to name one
devoted to the defense of both the United
who possesses all the requisite qualifications in
States and the Philippines, indisputably a
the person of Kalayon. It cited Section 6.0 of the
function of the government of the highest
DBM Local Budget Circular No. 31 which states,
order; they are not utilized for nor dedicated to
"The DBM reserves the right to fill up any existing
commercial or business purposes."
vacancy where none of the nominees of the local
chief executive meet the prescribed
requirements."
The provision for venue in the contract does not (a) Was the DBM's appointment valid? (2%)
constitute a waiver of the State Immunity from(b) What can you say regarding the above-
suit, because the express waiver of this immunityquoted Section 6.0 of DBM's Local Budget
can only be made by a statute. Circular No. 31? Explain your answers. (2%)
In Republic us. Purisima 78 SCRA 470, 474,
the Supreme Court ruled: "Apparently
respondent Judge was misled by the terms of
the contract between the private respondent,
plaintiff in his sala and defendant Rice and
Corn Administration which, according to him,
anticipated the case of a breach of contract
between the parties and the suits that may
thereafter arise. The consent, to be effective
though, must come from the State acting
through a duly enacted statute as pointed out
by Justice Bengzon in Mobil."
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
In accordance with the doctrine of exhaustion of
administrative remedies, Raintree Corporation
should first file a claim with the Commission on
Audit. If the claim is denied, it should file a
petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court.
Boundary Dispute Resolution; LGU; RTC’s
Jurisdiction (Q10-2005)
1 - There was a boundary dispute between
Duenas, a municipality, and Passi, an
independent component city, both of the same
province. State how the two local government
units should settle their boundary dispute. (5%)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Boundary disputes between local government
units should, as much as possible, be settled
amicably. After efforts at settlement fail, then the
dispute may be brought to the appropriate
Regional Trial Court in the said province. Since
the Local Government Code is silent as to what
body has exclusive jurisdiction over the settlement
of boundary disputes between a municipality and
an independent component city of the same
province, the Regional Trial Courts have general
jurisdiction to adjudicate the said controversy.
(Mun. of Kananga v. Madrona, G.R. No. 141375,
April 30, 2003)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
D. (a) Under Section 1 of Executive Order No.
112, the Provincial Budget Officer must be
recommended by the Governor. Since Josefa
Kalayon was not recommended by the Governor,
her appointment is not valid. As held in San Juan
v. Civil Service Commission, 196 SCRA 69, if the
person recommended by the Governor is not
qualified, what the Secretary of Budget and
Management should do is to ask him to
recommend someone who is eligible.
Police Power; LLDA (1995) Power to Issue Subpoena & Cite For Contempt
No. 9: The Municipality of Binangonan, Rizal, (1993)
passed a resolution authorizing the operation of No
an 6: Mayor Alfredo Lim closed the funhouses in
open garbage dumpsite in a 9- hectare land in thethe Ermita district suspected of being fronts for
Reyes Estate within the Municipality's territorial
prostitution. To determine the feasibility of putting
limits. Some concerned residents of Binangonan up a legalized red light district, the city council
filed a complaint with the Laguna Lake conducted an inquiry and invited operators of the
Development Authority (LLDA) to stop the closed funhouses to get their views. No one
operation of the dumpsite due to its harmful effects
honored the Invitation. The city council issued
on the health of the residents. The LLDA conducted
subpoenas to compel the attendance of the
an on-site investigation, monitoring, testing andoperators but which were completely disregarded.
water sampling and found that the dumpsite would The council declared the operators guilty of
contaminate Laguna de Bay and the surrounding contempt and issued warrants for their arrest.
areas of the Municipality. The LLDA also
discovered that no environmental clearance was
secured by the Municipality from the Department ofThe operators come to you for legal advice,
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and asking the following questions:
the LLDA as required by law. The LLDA therefore
issued to the Binangonan municipal government(1)a Is the council empowered to issue
cease and desist order to stop the operation of the
subpoenas
(2) Does the
to compel
council their
haveattendance?
the power to cite for
dumpsite. The Municipality of Binangonan filed contempt?
a
case to annul the order issued by the LLDA.
(2) The city council does not have the power toThe question of whether there is genuine
cite for contempt. There is likewise no provision innecessity for the expropriation of Christina's lot or
the Constitution, the Local Government Code, orwhether the municipality has other and better lots
any other laws granting local legislative bodies thefor the purpose is a matter that will have to be
power to cite for contempt. Such power cannot beresolved by the Court upon presentation of
deemed implied in the delegation of legislativeevidence by the parties to the case.
power to local legislative bodies, for the existence
of such power poses a potential derogation ofPowers of Barangay Assembly (2003)
individual rights. Can a Barangay Assembly exercise any police
power?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Power; Eminent Domain; LGU; Right to No, the Barangay Assembly cannot exercise any
Exercise (Q10-2005) police power. Under Section 398 of the Local
The Sangguniang Bayan of the Municipality Government of Code, it can only recommend to the
Santa, Ilocos Sur passed Resolution No. Sangguniang 1 Barangay the adoption of measures
authorizing its Mayor to initiate a petition for the for the welfare of the barangay and decide on the
expropriation of a lot owned by Christina as site adoption of an initiative.
for its municipal sports center. This was approved
by the Mayor. However, the Sangguniang
Panlalawigan of Ilocos Sur disapproved the Powers; Liga ng mga Barangay (2003)
Resolution as there might still be other available Can the Liga ng mga Barangay exercise
lots in Santa for a sports center. legislative powers?
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The Liga ng Mga Barangay cannot exercise
Nonetheless, the Municipality of Santa, throughlegislative
its powers. As stated in Bito-Onon v.
Mayor, filed a complaint for eminent domain. Fernandez. 350 SCRA 732 [2001], it is not a local
Christina opposed this on the following grounds: (a)
government unit and its primary purpose is to
the Municipality of Santa has no power to determine representation of the mga in the
expropriate; (b) Resolution No. 1 has been voided sanggunians; to ventilate, articulate, and crystallize
since the Sangguniang Panlalawigan disapproved issues affecting barangay government
it for being arbitrary; and (c) the Municipality of administration; and to secure solutions for them
Santa has other and better lots for that purpose. through proper and legal means.
Resolve the case with reasons. (5%)
The contention of Representative Valera is not No XVI. In the elections of May 1992, Cruz and
correct As held in Santiago v. Sandiganbayan, Santos were the candidates for the office of
356 SCRA 636, the suspension contemplated in Municipal Mayor, the term of which was to expire
Article VI, Section 16(3) of the Constitution is a on June 30, 1995. Finding that he won by a
punishment that is imposed by the Senate or margin of 20 votes, the Municipal Board of
House of Representatives upon an erring Canvassers proclaimed Cruz as the duly elected
member, it is distinct from the suspension under Mayor. Santos filed an election protest
before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) which B. AVE cannot collect salaries and allowances
decided that it was Santos who had the plurality from the government for the first two years of his
of 30 votes and proclaimed him the winner. On term, because in the meanwhile BART collected
motion made, the RTC granted execution the salaries and allowances. BART was a de
pending the appeal of Cruz to the COMELEC facto officer while he was in possession of the
(Comelec) and on this basis. Santos assumed office. To allow AVE to collect the salaries and
office and served as Municipal Mayor. In time, theallowances will result in making the government
Comelec reversed the ruling of the RTC and pay a second time. (Mechem, A Treatise on the
instead ruled that Cruz won by a margin of 40 Law of Public Offices and Public Officers, [1890]
votes and proclaimed him the duly elected pp. 222-223.)
Municipal Mayor.
BART is not required to refund to the government
a) It is now beyond June 30, 1995. Can Cruz
the salaries and allowances he received. As a de
still hold office for the portion of the term he has
facto officer, he is entitled to the salaries and
failed to serve? Why? (3%)
allowances because he rendered services during
b) Was Santos a usurper and should he pay his incumbency. (Rodriguez v. Tan, 91 Phil. 724
back what he has received while holding the 119520.
office as Municipal Mayor? Why? (2%)
The bills which BART alone authored and were
SUGGESTED ANSWER;
approved by the House of Representatives are
a) Cruz can no longer hold office for the portion valid because he was a de facto officer during
of the term he failed to serve since his term has his incumbency. The acts of a de facto officer are
expired. valid insofar as the public is concerned. (People
v. Garcia, 313 SCRA 279 [19990.
b) Santos was not a usurper. He was a de facto
officer, since he had a color of election to the
office of Municipal Mayor by virtue of the
Graft and Corruption; Prescription of Crime
decision in the election protest. Hence, he is
(2002)
entitled to the emoluments of the office.
No XII. Suppose a public officer has committed a
violation of Section 3 (b) and (c) of the Anti-Graft
Elective Public Officers; De Facto Officer; and Corrupt Practices Act {RA No, 3019), as
effects (2004) amended, by receiving monetary and other
material considerations for contracts entered into
X-B. AVE ran for Congressman of QU province.
by him in behalf of the government and in
However, his opponent, BART, was the one
connection with other transactions, as a result of
proclaimed and seated as the winner of the
which he has amassed illegally acquired wealth.
election by the COMELEC. AVE filed seasonably
a protest before HRET (House of Representatives
Electoral Tribunal). After two years, HRET (a) Does the criminal offense committed
reversed the COMELEC’s decision and AVE was prescribe? (2%)
proclaimed finally as the duly elected
(b) Does the right of the government to recover
Congressman. Thus, he had only one year to
the illegally acquired wealth prescribe? (3%)
serve in Congress.
Can AVE collect salaries and allowances from the
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
government for the first two years of his term as
Congressman? (a) A violation of Section 3(b) and (c) of the Anti-
Graft and Corrupt Practices Act prescribes. As
Should BART refund to the government the
held in Presidential Ad-Hoc Fact-Finding
salaries and allowances he had received as
Committee on Behest Loans v. Desierto, 317
Congressman?
SCRA 272 (1999), Article XI, Section 15 of the
What will happen to the bills that BART alone Constitution does not apply to criminal cases for
authored and were approved by the House of violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices
Representatives while he was seated asAct
Congressman? Reason and explain briefly. (5%)
(b) Article XI, Section 15 of the Constitution
provides that the right of the State to recover
SUGGESTED ANSWER: properties unlawfully acquired by public officials
or employees, or from them or from their
nominees or transferees, shall not be barred by
prescription.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1. A private communication made by any person
No, the City Mayor may not accept his designationto another in the performance of any legal, moral
without forfeiting his elective positions. As statedor social duty;"
in Flores vs. Drilon 223 SCRA 568, it is the
In Deano v. Godinez, 12 SCRA 483, it was held
intention of Section 7, Article X-B of the 1987
that a report sent by a public official to his superior
Constitution that local elective officials should
is privileged communication, because its
devote their full time to their constituents. While
submission is pursuant to the performance of a
second paragraph of Section 7, Article IX-B of the
legal duty.
1987 Constitution allows appointive officials to
hold other offices when allowed by law or by the Besides, in sending his report, the Secretary of
primary functions of their positions, no such Public Works acted in the discharge of his official
exception is made in the first paragraph, which duties. Hence, he was acting in behalf of the
Republic of the Philippines and within the scope
deals with elective officials. It is the Intention of
the 1987 Constitution to be more stringent with of his authority According to the ruling in Sanders
elective local officials. v. Veridiano, 162 SCRA 88, a suit brought against
a public official for writing a letter which is alleged
to be libelous but which was written while he was
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
acting as agent of the government and within the
Yes, he may accept such designation without scope of his authority is actually a suit against the
forfeiting his mayorship. The Constitutional provision
State without its consent.
being cited contemplates a "public office or position".
It is believed that the Local Amnesty Board is not
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
such an office since it is merely an ad hoc body.
Besides, it is believed that its functions are The not question does not specify how the libel was
committed. If the libelous statement was not
"sovereign" in character which is one of the elements
of a public office. relevant to the report on the alleged illegal
encroachment of the river, the fact that it was
made in the course of an official report does not
No II A group of losing litigants in a case decidedhis authority. Congress intended to empower the
by the Supreme Court filed a complaint beforeOmbudsman to suspend all officers, even if they
the Ombudsman charging the Justices withare employed in other offices in the Government.
knowingly and deliberately rendering an unjustThe words "subordinate" and "in his bureau" do
decision in utter violation of the penal laws of thenot appear in the grant of such power to the
land. Can the Ombudsman validly takeOmbudsman.
cognizance of the case? Explain.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: Power to Issue Subpoena; validity of
delegation (1989)
No, the Ombudsman cannot entertain the
complaint. As stated in the case of In re: Laureta.No. 17: Assume that under the charter of the City
148 SCRA 382 [1987], pursuant to the principleofof Manila, the City Mayor has the power to
separation of powers, the correctness of the investigate city officials and employees appointed
decisions of the Supreme Court as final arbiterby of him and in connection therewith, administer
oath,
all justiciable disputes is conclusive upon all other take testimony and issue subpoenas. The
departments of the government; the Ombudsman mayor issued an executive order creating a
has no power to review the decisions of the committee, chaired by "X", to investigate
Supreme Court by entertaining a complaint anomalies involving licensed inspectors of the
against the Justices of the Supreme Court for License Inspection Division of the Office of the City
knowingly rendering an unjust decision. Treasurer, In the course of its investigation, "X"
subpoenaed "Y", a private citizen working as
bookkeeper of Asia Hardware. "Y" refused to
SECOND ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: appear contending that theThe Committee of of"X" has
SUGGESTED ANSWER: contention
Article XI, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution no power to issue subpoenas. Decide.
Director WOW is not meritorious. The suspension
provides that public officers must at all times bemeted out to him is preventive and not punitive.
accountable to the people. Section 22 of theSection 24 of Republic
SUGGESTED Act No. 6770 grants the
ANSWER:
Ombudsman Act provides that the Office of theOmbudsman the power to impose preventive
Ombudsman has the power to investigate any Yes, the committee
suspension up to six months.has no power to issue
Preventive
serious misconduct allegedly committed bysuspension maybe imposed withoutvs,
subpoenas according to Carmelo anyRamos,
notice or6
officials removable by impeachment for the SCRA
hearing.836.It isInmerely
creating the committee,
a preliminary step inthe
an mayor
did not grant it the power
purpose of filing a verified complaint foradministrative investigation and is not the final to issue subpoenas.
impeachment if warranted. The Ombudsman can Besides, the mayor
determination of the cannot
guilt of delegate
the officerhis power to
concerned.
entertain the complaint for this purpose. issue subpoenas.
(Garcia v. Mojica, 314 SCRA 207 [1999]).
Prohibition On Elective Officer to Hold Public
Ombudsman; Power to Suspend; Preventive Office (2002)
Suspension (1996) B. For his part, the Ombudsman moved to
No VII. X was elected provincial governor for a
dismiss WOWs petition. According to the
No. 10: 2) An administrative complaint for violationterm of three years. He was subsequently
Ombudsman the evidence of guilt of WOW is
of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act against X
appointed by the President of the Philippines
strong, and petitioner failed to exhaust
was filed with the Ombudsman. Immediately after serving at her pleasure, as concurrent Presidential
administrative remedies. WOW admitted he filed
taking cognizance of the case and the affidavits Assistant for Political Affairs in the Office of the
no motion for reconsideration, but only because
submitted to him, the Ombudsman ordered President, the without additional compensation.
the order suspending him was immediately
preventive suspension of X pending preliminary
executory. Should the motion to dismiss be
investigation. X questioned the suspension order,
Is X's
granted or appointment
not? Discussvalid? briefly.(5%)
(5%)
contending that the Ombudsman can only suspend
preventively subordinate employees in his own SUGGESTED ANSWER:
office.
The SUGGESTED
appointment ofANSWER: X is not valid, because the
position
B. The motionof Presidential
to dismiss should Assistant for Political
be denied. Since
Is X correct? Explain. Affairs
the is a public
suspension office. Article
of Director WOWIX-B was Section 7 of
the Constitution
immediately provides
executory, he that
would nohaveelective official
suffered
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
shall be eligible
irreparable injuryforhad appointment or designation in
he tried to exhaust
No, X is not correct. As held in Buenaseda vs. administrative
any capacity remedies to any public before office
filing a or position
petition in
Flavier, 226 SCRA 645. under Section 24 of during his tenure. As held in Flores
court (University of the Philippines Board of
Republic Act No. 6770, the Ombudsman can v. Drilon,
Regents 223 SCRA
v. Rasul, 200 SCRA 568 685 (1993), since an
[19910Besides,
place under preventive suspension any officer elective official is ineligible for
the question involved is purely legal. (Azarcon v. an appointive
under his disciplinary authority pending an position, his
Bunagan, 399 appointment
SCRA 365 is not valid.
[2003]).
investigation. The moment a complaint is filed
Public Office; Public Trust (1998)
with the Ombudsman, the respondent is underOmbudsman; Power to Investigate (2003)
No V. - Suppose Congress passed a law to
Implement the Constitutional principle that a incrimination seeks to prevent is the conviction of
public office is a public trust, by providing as the witness on the basis of testimony elicited
follows: from him. The rule is satisfied when he is granted
immunity.
"No employee of the Civil Service shall be excused
from attending and testifying or from producing books,ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
records, correspondence, documents or other
1. In accordance with Evangelista vs. Jarencio,
evidence in any administrative investigation
68 SCRA 99, 107-108, If Ong is being cited
concerning the office in which he is employed on the
merely as a witness, he may not refuse to
ground that his testimony or the evidence required of
answer. However, if the question tends to violate
him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a
his right against self-incrimination, he may object
penalty or forfeiture; but his testimony or any evidence
to it. On the other hand, under the ruling in
produced by him shall not be used against him in
Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663, 680,
criminal prosecution based on the transaction, matter
If he is a respondent, Ong may refuse to answer
or thing concerning which is compelled, after invoking
any question because of his right against self-
his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or
incrimination.
produce evidence. Provided, however, that such
individual so testifying shall not be exempt fromSUGGESTED ANSWER:
prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in Ong cannot argue that the Civil Service
2. No
so testifying nor shall he be exempt from demotion orCommission inferred his guilt from his refusal
removal from office. Any employee who refuses toto answer. He was not dismissed because of
testify or produce any documents under this Act shallhis involvement in the leakage in the medical
be dismissed from the service," examination but for his refusal to answer.
This is a violation of the law. He could be
compelled to answer the question on pain of
being dismissed in case of his refusal,
because he was granted Immunity.
Suppose further, that Ong, a member of the
Professional Regulatory Board, is required to
answer questions in an investigation regarding a
LEAKAGE in a medical examination.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1. No, Ong cannot refuse to answer the question
on the ground that he would incriminate himself,
since the law grants him immunity and prohibits
the use against him in a criminal prosecution of
the testimony or evidence produced by him. As
stated by the United States Supreme Court in
Brown vs. Walker. 161 U.S. 591, 597, what the
constitutional prohibition against self-
No. 9: 2) A, an employee of the National
Treasurer, retired on January 10, 1996. Before 1. I disagree. Under Section 7, Article XII of the
she could collect her retirement benefits, the Constitution, a corporation or association which is
National Treasurer discovered that A had been sixty percent owned by Filipino citizens can
negligent in the encashment of falsified treasury acquire private land, because it can lease public
warrants. It appears, however, that A had received land and can therefore hold public land. However,
all money and property clearances from the it cannot acquire public land. Under Section 3,
National Treasurer before her retirement. Article XII of the Constitution, private corporations
and associations can only lease and cannot
acquire public land.
Can the National Treasurer withhold the
retirement of A pending determination of her
negligence in the encashment of the falsifiedUnder Section 8, Article XII of the Constitution, a
treasury warrants? Explain. natural-born Filipino citizen who lost his Philippine
citizenship may acquire private land only and
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
cannot acquire public land.
2) In accordance with Tantuico vs. Domingo, 230
SCRA 391 and Cruz us. Tantuico, 166 SCRA 670,
2. I disagree. The mere fact that a corporation is
the National Treasurer cannot withhold the
religious does not entitle it to own public land. As
payment of the retirement benefits of A pending
held In Register of Deeds vs. Ung Siu Si Temple,
determination of her liability for negligence in the
97 Phil. 58, 61, land tenure is not indispensable
encashment of the falsified treasury warrants,
to the free exercise and enjoyment of religious
because her retirement benefits are exempt from
profession of worship. The religious corporation
execution.
can own private land only if it is at least sixty per
cent owned by Filipino citizens.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
B. ARI cannot acquire a portion of Liberty Islands
because, although EAP has title to Liberty Islands
and thus such lands are alienable and disposable
land, they cannot be sold, only leased, to private
corporations. The portion of the area to be
reclaimed cannot be sold and transferred to ARI
because the seabed is inalienable land of the
public domain. (Section 3, Article XII of the 1987
Constitution; Chavez v. Public Estates Authority,
384 SCRA 152 [2002]).
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Ownership Requirement of Mass Media (1989) SUGGESTED ANSWER: The law is valid as
under Article XII, Section 2 of the 1987
Constitution, the exploration, development,
No. 11: (1) A domestic corporation with 30%
and utilization of natural resources shall be
foreign equity proposes to publish a weekly
under the full control and supervision of the
magazine for general circulation in Metro Manila
State. It is also provided that the State may
which will feature the lifestyles of the rich and the
directly undertake such activities or it may
famous. May this be done? Cite the constitutional
enter into co-production, joint venture or
provision in point.
sharing agreements with Filipino citizens or
SUGGESTED ANSWER: corporations or associations, at least 60%
(1) No, the corporation cannot publish a weekly Filipino-owned.
magazine since it is engaged in the operation of
a mass media and is not wholly owned by Furthermore, the President may enter into
Philippine citizens. agreements with foreign-owned corporations
involving technical or financial assistance for
Section 11(1), Article XVI of the 1987 Constitution
large-scale exploration, development, and
provides; "The ownership and management of
utilization of minerals, petroleum and other
mass media shall be limited to citizens of the
mineral oils, according to terms and conditions
Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or
provided by law. A state corporation, unlike a
associations, wholly-owned and managed by
private corporation, may be created by special
such citizens."
law and placed under the control of the
President, subject to such conditions as the
Chinese citizens; engaging in retail trade (Q4- creating statute may provide.
2006)
State whether or not the following laws are
constitutional. Explain briefly.
4. A law prohibiting Chinese citizens from ARTICLE XIII Social Justice and
engaging in retail trade. (2%) SUGGESTED
ANSWER: The law is invalid as it singles out and Human Rights Agrarian Reform Law;
deprives Chinese citizens from engaging in retail Coverage (1992)
trade. In Ichong v. Hernandez, No. 12: Teodoro Luzung is engaged in the
business of prawn farming, The prawns are
G.R. No. L-7995, May 31,1957, the courtnurtured in his fishponds in Mindoro and, upon
held that the Treaty of Amity between theharvest, are immediately frozen for export.
Republic of the Philippines and the Republic
of China guarantees equality of treatment tob) Congress
At least passed
seventythe Comprehensive
percent (70%) of the Agrarian
equity of
Reform Law of 1988 which provides
the Chinese nationals "upon the same termsbusiness entities engaged in advertising must be among
others that
as the nationals of any other country." Thus,owned all private
by Filipino landsunder
citizens devotedthe to agriculture
Constitution.
shall be subject to agrarian
the court ruled therein that the nationals of(Section 11(2), Article XVI) reform. The law
China are not discriminated against because includes under the term "agriculture" the
nationals of all other countries, except thosefollowing activities: cultivation of the soil, planting
of the United States, who are grantedof c) crops, growing
Mass media of fruit
must trees, raising
be wholly ownedofby Filipino
special rights by the Constitution, are allcitizens under the Constitution (Sectionof11(1),
livestock, poultry or fish. The Department
prohibited from engaging in the retail trade.Agrarian Reform issued an implementing order
Article XVI).
In the case at bar, the law discriminates only which provides that commercial farms used for
against Chinese citizens and thus violates aqua-culture, including salt-beds, fishponds and
the equal protection clause. prawn farms are within
2) Under the Constitution, the scope
aliensof may
the law.
acquire
equity but cannot participate in the
Can the law be declared unconstitutional? management of
business
Decide. entities engaged in the following
activities:
Exploration, development, and utilization of SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) Public utilities (Section 11, Article
natural resources (Q4-2006) As held in XII)
Luz Farms vs. Secretary of the
State whether or not the law is constitutional. Department of Agrarian Reform, 192 SCRA 51, the
Explain briefly. law2)is unconstitutional
Education (Section
insofar as 4(2) .Article XIV)
it included
5. A law creating a state corporation livestock,
to poultry and swine raising. In the definition
3) Advertising (Section 11(2), Article
exploit, develop, and utilize compressed natural of the agricultural land which the Constitutional
XVI)
gas. (2%) Commission adopted in
connection with agrarian reform, lands devoted tothe occupants to vacate the structures within five
such purposes were not included. However, both days from notice, otherwise they would be evicted
the law and the implementing order are and relocated and their shanties removed, in
constitutional insofar as they included fishponds. order that the parcel of land could be converted
The definition of agricultural land which the into a park for public use and enjoyment. The
Constitutional Commission adopted included inhabitants of the parcel of land complained to the
fishponds. Commission on Human Rights urging that the
Mayor of Quezon City be stopped from doing
what he has threatened to do. The Commission
Commission on Human Rights; Power toon Human Rights, after conducting an
investigate (1992) investigation and finding that the shanties of
petitioners were already being demolished by
No. 15 -Walang Sugat, a vigilante group
then, ordered the Quezon City Mayor and persons
composed of private businessmen and civic
Implementing his order to cease and desist from
leaders previously victimized by the Nationalist
demolishing petitioners' shanties under pain of
Patriotic Army (NPA) rebel group, was implicated
contempt.
in the torture and kidnapping of Dr. Mengele, a
known NPA sympathizer. What have you to say on the validity of the
actuation of the Commission on Human Rights in
b) Does the Commission on Human Rights have
relation to that of the Quezon City Mayor?
the power to investigate and adjudicate the
matter? SUGGESTED ANSWER:
SUGGESTED ANSWER; The actuation of the Commission on Human
Rights is void. In Simon vs. Commission on
b) Under Section 18, Article XIII of the
Human Rights, 229 SCRA 117. the Court held
Constitution, the Commission on Human Rights
that the Commission on Human Rights has no
has the power to investigate all forms of human
power to issue a restraining order or a writ of
rights violations involving civil and political rights
injunction and has no power to cite for contempt
and to monitor the compliance by the government
for violation of the restraining order or a writ of
with international treaty obligations on human
preliminary injunction. The cease and desist
rights. As held in Carino vs. Commission on
order, according to the Court, is a semantic
Human Rights, 204 SCRA 483, the Commission
Interplay for a restraining order. Its power to cite
on Human Rights has no power to decide cases
for contempt should be understood to apply only
involving violations of civil and political rights. It
to violations of its adopted operational guidelines
can only investigate them and then refer the
and rules of procedure essential to carry out its
matter to the appropriate government agency.
investigatorial powers, which it is constitutionally
authorized to adopt.
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
If what is referred to in the problem is the
Commission on Human Rights; Power to
Commission on Human Rights under the United
issue TRO (2001)
National Economic and Social Council, the case
may be investigated by the Commission based on No VI - In order to implement a big government
a special procedure for fact-finding and inquiryflood control project, the Department of Public
based on the consent of the States concerned. Works and Highways (DPWH) and a local
However, this does not constitute investigation in
government unit (LGU) removed squatters from
the bank of a river and certain esteros for
the usual sense of the term, with no objective of
establishing culpability. The Commission on relocation to another place. Their shanties were
Human Rights is not empowered to make demolished. The Commission on Human Rights
adjudications. (CHR) conducted an investigation and issued an
order for the DPWH and the LGU to cease and
desist from effecting the removal of the squatters
Commission on Human Rights; Power toon the ground that the human rights of the
issue TRO (1997) squatters were being violated. The DPWH and
No. 8 - About a hundred people occupied a the LGU objected to the order of the CHR
parcel of land in Quezon City belonging to the city
government and built shanties thereon which Resolve which position is correct. Reasons (5%)
they utilized for dwelling, sari-sari stores, etc. The
City Mayor issued an order directing
SUGGESTED ANSWER; consequent danger to life and limb cannot
be ignored. It is paradoxical that a right
The position of the Department of Public Works
which is claimed to have been violated is
and Highways and of the local government unit is
one that cannot, in the first place, even be
correct. As held in Export Processing Zone
invoked, if it is, in fact, extant. Based on
Authority v. Commission on Human Rights, 208
the circumstances obtaining in this
SCRA125 (1992), no provision in the Constitution
instance, the CHR order for demolition do
or any law confers on the Commission on Human
not fall within the compartment of human
Rights jurisdiction to issue temporary restraining
rights violations involving civil and political
orders or writs of preliminary injunction. The
rights intended by the Constitution. (Simon
Commission on Human Rights has no judicial
v. Commission on Human Rights, G.R. No.
power. Its powers are merely investigatory.
100150, January 5, 1994)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(b) The seminary has institutional autonomy
which gives it the right, all things being equal, to
choose whom it will admit as student. (Garcia v.
Faculty of Admission, Loyola School of Theology,
68 SCRA 277 (1975); Villar v. Technological
Institute of the Philippines, 135 SCRA 706
(1985); Tangonan
v. Cruz Pano, 137 SCRA 245 (1985) ) This
autonomy is sufficiently large to permit in this
case the seminary to choose between the rich
man's son and the poor man's son.
No. 18: Ting, a student of Bangkerohan University, (c) The preference given to the poor man's son is
was given
1The State
a failing
shallgrade
establish,
by Professor
maintain Mahigpit.
and support academic a
justified. freedom
Not only ofisanthe institution
seminary of higher
entitled to
complete, adequate,
Ting confronted Professor and integrated
Mahigpit at thesystem
corridor of education
learning
choose includes
whom itthe willfreedom
admit to determine
because it who
enjoys
relevant
after class andtoathe needs
heated of the people
argument ensued. andCooler
society.
may [Section
teach, what
institutional may be(Art.
autonomy taught,
XIV,howSec.it shall
5(2) be ) but
heads2(1)]
prevented the verbal war ending in physical taught,
the choice and who made mayinbethis admitted
case to is study.
a wise and
The StateMahigpit
confrontation. shall establish
left theand maintain
campus anda went
systemBecause of free
judicious ofone.
academic
The rich freedom,
man's an son
institution
had beenof
public
shopping In education
a department in the elementary
store. Ting saw and highhigher
Mahigpit schoollearning
expelled levels.
from can refuse toschool
another re-enrollbecause
a student of
and [Section
without 2(2)]any warning mauled the latter. who
academicis academically
delinquency. deficient or whothe
Despite haseconomic
violated
The filed
Mahigpit Stateanshall establish and
administrative maintainagainst
complaint a systemthe of of and
rules
advantage discipline. Academic
opportunity freedom
he had, he stillgrants
failed
Ting scholarship
before the Dean grants,ofstudent
Students loanforprograms,
breach of subsidies,
institutions
in his school andof higher
work, learning
warranting the adiscretion
finding that to he
otherrules
university incentives which shallThe
and regulations. be available
Dean settothe deserving
formulate
cannot really rulesdoforschool
the granting
work. On of honors.
the other hand,
students
complaint for inhearing.
both public and private
However, Tingschools, especially
filed Likewise,
a poor man's
the to sonofmay
because academic freedom, an
be academically deficient
thebefore
petition underprivileged.
the RTC to [Section
prohibit2(3)]the Dean and institution
precisely as of higher
a resultlearning
of poverty can so
closethata ifschool.
relieved
The State
the school fromshall encourage
investigating himnon-formal,
contending informal
that and
of its effects it is probable he will do better in
indigenous
the mauling learning
incident systems,
happened as well
outside theasschool
self-learning,
school. The democratization of wealth and power,
independent
premises and out-ofschool
and therefore, outside study the program
school's particularly
implicit in Art. XIII, Sec. 1, and justifies the
those that respond to community
jurisdiction. The school and the Dean answered needs,Education;
[Section
decision Alien
2|4|]of the Enrollees
Rector in&this Donors
case.(1999)
The State shall provide adult
that the school can investigate Ting since his citizens, the disabled, and
No II - C. What is the rule on the number of aliens
conductout-of-school
outside school youthhours
with training
and even in civics,
outsidevocational
of may enroll in educational institutions in the
who
schoolefficiency
premisesand otherthe
affect skills. [Section
welfare of the2(5)]
school; Education; Academic Freedom (1989)
Philippines. Give the exception to the rule. May
The State shall
and furthermore, the take
caseinto account
involves regional and
a student and sectoral
No. institutions
such 9: What doaccept you understand
donations by from academic
foreign
facultyneeds
member. and conditions
If you wereand theshall
judge,encourage
how would local planning
freedom?
students under the pretext that such donations are
in the the
you decide development
case? of educational policies and programs.
to be used to buy equipment and improve school
[Section 5(1|] SUGGESTED ANSWER:
facilities? Explain. (2%)
The State shall enhance the rights of teachers to
According to Sidney Hook, academic freedom is
professional advancement. Non-teaching academic and
SUGGESTED ANSWER: the freedom of professionally qualified persons to
non-academic personnel shall enjoy the protection SUGGESTED
of the ANSWER:
inquire, discover, publish and teach the truth as
If I were
State.the[Section
Judge, 5(4)]
I would dismiss the petition.
C.theyUnder
see it inSection
the field 4(2),
of theirArticle
competenceXIV of the
without
In Angeles
The State v Sison, 112 SCRA
shall assign 26, it budgetary
the highest was held priority to
Constitution,
being subjectnoto group any control of aliens shall comprise
or authority except
that aeducation
school can andsubject
ensuretothat disciplinary
teaching action a and retain
will attract
more than or
the control one-third
authorityofof the rational
enrollment methodsin anyby
student who assaulted
its rightful share of the a professor
best available outside the through
talents
school.
which truthsThe or exception
conclusionsrefers to schools
are sought and
schooladequate
premises, because theand
remuneration misconduct
other means of theof job
established
established for foreign
in these diplomatic personnel and
disciplines.
student involves and
satisfaction his fulfillment.
status as, a student
[Section 5(5)] or
their dependents and, unless otherwise provided
affects the good name or reputation of the
by law, for other foreign temporary residents.
school. The misconduct of Ting directly affectsIn Garcia vs. Faculty Admission Committee, 68
his suitability as a student. SCRA 277, it was held that the academic freedom
of
Educational
institutions institutions
of higher learning may acceptinvolves donations
a wide
from foreign
sphere of autonomy students. No provision
in deciding in the
their objectives
and
Constitution
the bestor means any law of prohibits
attaining
it. them without
outside interference except when overriding public
welfare calls for some restraint. Thus, a school
can Education;
determine Duties for itselfofwho Statemayinteach,
Re Education
who may
be(1999)
taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be
enjoyed by institutions of higher learning. admitted (2%)
No to study.
II - B. Give In Tangonon
two duties of the state vs.mandated
Pano, 137 by
SCRA
the Constitution regarding education. (2%) freedom
245, it was held that the academic
SUGGESTED ANSWER: of an institution of higher learning includes the
A. According to Reyes v. Court of Appeals, 194 right to prescribe academic standards and to
refuseSUGGESTED
re-enrollmentANSWER: to students for academic
SCRA 402, academic freedom is the freedom of a
deficiencies and violation of disciplinary
faculty member to pursue his studies in hisB. Article XIV of the Constitution imposes the
regulations. According to University of San Carlos
particular specialty and thereafter to make knownfollowing duties regarding education upon the
vs. Court of Appeals,
or publish the result of his endeavors without fearState:
that retribution would be visited on him in the
G.R. 1. No. 79237, The State
October shall18,
protect
1988,andacademic
promote
event that his conclusions are found distasteful or the right of all citizens
freedom includes the to qualitytoeducation
right prescribe at
objectionable by the powers that be, whether in all levelsforand
requirements theshall take appropriate
conferment of honors.steps to
the political, economic, or academic make such education accessible to all.
establishments. (Section 1)
In Garcia v. Faculty Admission Committee, 68 Education; Academic Freedom (1993)
SCRA 277, it was held that the
Education; Flag Salute (1987)
No. XIII: The requirement that school children
participate in flag ceremonies has been the
subject of controversy. On the one hand it is the
view that the requirement violates religious
freedom; on the other is the Supreme Court
decision that because of relevant provisions of
the 1935 Constitution the flag salute may be
validly required.
Which of the above finds support on 1987
Constitution, Cite at least two provisions to prove
your point.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The view that flag salute may validly be required
finds support in the following provisions of the
1987 Constitution:
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
I shall take the proposition for Team C.
International Law and municipal law are supreme
in their own respective fields. Neither has
hegemony over the other. (Brownlie, Principles of
Public International Law, 4th ed. p. 157.) Under
Article II, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution, the
generally accepted principles of international law
form part of the law of the land. Since they merely
have the force of law, if
wish to take an active part in international politics. Outer space in this estimate begins from the
The power that guarantee its neutralization may belowest altitude an artificial satellite can remain in
motivated either by balance of power considerations orbit. Under the Moon Treaty of 1979 the moon
or by the desire to make the weak state a buffer and the other celestial bodies form part of outer
between the territories of the great powers. (J. space.
SALONGA & P. YAP, PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL
In outer space, the space satellites or objects are
LAW 76 (1966)).
under the jurisdiction of States of registry which
covers astronauts and cosmonauts. This matter is
2. Firstly, neutrality obtains only during war, covered by the Registration of Objects in Space
whereas neutralization is a condition that applies Convention of 1974 and the Liability for Damage
in peace or in war. Secondly, neutralization is Caused
a by Spaced Objects Convention of 1972.
status created by means of treaty, whereas
neutrality is a status created under international
Principle of Auto-Limitation (Q10-2006)
law, by means of a stand on the part of a state not
1. What is the principle of auto-limitation?
to side with any of the parties at war. Thirdly,
(2.5%) ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Under the
neutrality is brought about by a unilateral
principle of auto-limitation, any state may by its
declaration by the neutral State, while
consent, express or implied, submit to a
neutralization cannot be effected by unilateral act,
restriction of its sovereign rights. There may thus
but must be recognized by other States. (Id.)
be a curtailment of what otherwise is a plenary
power (Reagan v. CIR, G.R. L-26379, December
Outer Space; Jurisdiction (2003) 27, 1969).
No XIX - What is outer-space? Who or which
can exercise jurisdiction over astronauts while in
outer space?
Reciprocity v. Principle of Auto-Limitation
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: (Q10-2006)
2. What is the relationship between reciprocity
There are several schools of thought regarding the
and the principle of auto-limitation? (2.5%)
determination of outer space, such as the limit of
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: When the Philippines
air flight, the height of atmospheric space, infinity,
enters into treaties, necessarily, these international
the lowest altitude of an artificial satellite, and an
agreements may contain limitations on Philippine
altitude approximating aerodynamic lift. Another
sovereignty. The consideration in this partial surrender
school of thought proceeds by analogy to the law
of sovereignty is the reciprocal commitment of other
of the sea. It proposes that a State should exercise
contracting states in granting the same privilege and
full sovereignty up to the height to which an aircraft
immunities to the Philippines. For example, this kind of
can ascend. Non-militant flight instrumentalities
reciprocity in relation to the principle of auto-limitation
should be allowed over a second area, a
characterizes the Philippine commitments under
contiguous zone of 300 miles. Over that should be
WTO-GATT. This is based on the constitutional
outer space. The boundary between airspace and
provision that the Philippines "adopts the generally
outer space has not yet been defined. (Harris,
accepted principles of international law as part of the
Cases and Materials on International Law, 5th ed..
law of the land and adheres to the policy of ...
pp. 251-253.) Under Article 8 of the Treaty on the
cooperation and amity with all nations" (Tanada v.
Principles Governing the Activities of States in the
Angara, G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997).
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the
Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, a State on
whose registry an object launched into outer space
retains jurisdiction over the astronauts while they
are in outer space. SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1. Whether simple or composite, a State is said to
be neutralized where its independence and
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: integrity are guaranteed by an international
convention on the condition that such State
Outer space is the space beyond the airspace
obligates
Recognitionitself of
never
States;
to take
De up
Facto
armsvs.
against
De Jureany
surrounding the Earth or beyond the national
other State, except
Recognition for self-defense, or enter into
(1998)
airspace. In law, the boundary between outer space
such international obligations as would indirectly
and airspace has remained undetermined. ButNoinXII. Distinguish between de facto recognition
involve it in war. A State seeks neutralization
and
theory, this has been estimated to be between 80 to de jure recognition of states. [5%)
where it is weak and does not
90 kilometers.
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
The following are the distinctions between de
facto recognition and de Jure recognition of a
government:
1De facto recognition is provisional, de Jure recognition
is relatively permanent;
De facto recognition does not vest title in the
government to its properties abroad; de Jure
recognition does;
De facto recognition is limited to certain juridical
relations; de jure recognition brings about full diplomatic
relations. (Cruz. International Law. 1996 ed.. p. 83.)
passage of warships through Mantranas Strait various parts of
Batanes. ByAsia. The Japanese
international Government
convention certain has
without giving any reason therefor. Subsequently, accordingly
corals are launched
protected a goodwill
species.campaign andthe
Just before has
another warship of Beta passed through the offered said vessel the Philippine
reached the Government
high seas, substantial
the Coast Guard
strait, and was fired upon by Epsilon's coastal assistance for a program
patrol intercepted thethat
vesselwill and
promote
seized— its
through
cargo
battery. Beta protested the aforesaid act of Epsilon government
includingand tuna.non-governmental
The master of the organizations
vessel and — the
drawing attention to the existing customary womens' owner rights,
of thechild
cargo welfare, nutrition
protested, and family
claiming the rights
international law that the regime of innocent health of care.
transit passage and innocent passage, and
passage (even of transit passage) is non- sought recovery of the cargo and the release of
suspendable. Epsilon countered that Mantranas the ship. Is the claim meritorious or not? Reason
An executive agreement is about to be signed for
Strait is not a necessary route, there being another briefly. (5%) SUGGESTED ANSWER; The claim
that purpose. The agreement includes a clause
suitable alternative route. Resolve the above- of innocent passage is not meritorious. While the
whereby the Philippine Government acknowledges
mentioned controversy, Explain your answer. (4%) vessel has the right of innocent passage, it should
that any liability to the "comfort women" or their
not commit a violation of any international
descendants are deemed covered by the
convention. The vessel did not merely navigate
SUGGESTED ANSWER: reparations agreements signed and implemented
through the territorial sea, it also dragged red
immediately after the Second World War.
Assuming that Epsilon and Beta are parties tocorals in violation of the international convention
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:
the UNCLOS, the controversy maybe resolvedwhich protected the red corals. This is prejudicial
Thefollows:
as distinction between de facto recognition and toJuliano
the goodIglesias,
order of the a Philippines.
descendant(Articleof a19(2) now
de jure recognition of a State is not clear of indeceased
the Conventioncomfortonwoman,
the Lawseeks of theyour
Sea)advice on
Under the UNCLOS, warships enjoy a right of
international law. It is, however, usually assumedthe validity of the agreement. Advise him.
innocent passage. It appearing that the portion of
as a point of distinction that while de facto
Epsilon's territorial sea in question is a strait used SUGGESTED ANSWER:
recognition is provisional and hence may be
for international navigation, Epsilon has no right
withdrawn, de jure recognition is final and cannot The agreement is valid. The comfort women and
under international law to suspend the right of
be withdrawn. their descendants cannot assert individual claims
innocent passage. Article 45(2) of the UNCLOS isRights and Obligation under UN Charter
against Japan. As stated in Davis & Moore vs.
Confronted
clear with the emergence
in providing that thereof shall
a new be no(1991)
political
Regan, 453 U.S. 654, the sovereign authority of a
entity in the of
suspension international community,
innocent passage a State
through may
straits
No. 14: State claims
X invades and conquers Stateforeign
Y.
State to settle of its nationals against
experience
used some difficulty
for international in responding to the
navigation.
countries has repeatedly been recognized. the
The United Nations Security Council declares This
question whether the new political order qualifies invasion and conquest illegal and orders
may be made without the consent of thean nationals
to be regarded as a state under international law, international embargo againstwith Statethem.
X. Since the
On the assumption that the straits in question isor noteven without consultation
in particular from the viewpoint of its effectiveness Subsequently,
used for international navigation, still continued the amity between a State anda other
the same U.N. body adopts
and independence on a permanent basis. The resolution calling for an
suspension of innocent passage by Epsilon cannot countries may require a enforcement action against
satisfactory compromise of
recognizing State may consider its act in regard State to
be effective because suspension is required under mutual claims, the necessary power toCharter.
X under Chapter VII of the U.N. make such
the new political entity as merely a de facto State Z, a U.N. member, religiously complies with
international law to be duly published before it compromises
can has been recognized. The settlement
recognition, implying that it may withdraw it if the in embargo but refuses to take part in the
take effect. There being no publication prior toofthesuch claims may be made by executive
the end it turns out that the conditions enforcement of
suspension of innocent passage by Beta's warship, agreement. action, sending a medical mission
statehood are not fulfilled should the new authority instead of fighting troops to the troubled area.
Epsilon's act acquires no validity.
not remain in power.
Right to Innocent Passage (1999)
Moreover, Epsilon's suspension of (a) Did State Z violate its obligations under the
innocent
But even then, a de facto recognition in this No X U.N.- C. Charter?
State Epsilon, during peace time, has
passage may not be valid for the reason that there
context produces legal effects in the same way as allowed foreign ships innocent passage through
is no showing that it is essential for the protection
de jure recognition. Whether recognition is de Mantranas Strait, a strait within Epsilon's territorial
of its security. The actuation of Beta's warship in(b) If so, what sanctions may be taken against
facto or de jure, steps may be taken to withdraw sea which has been used by foreign ships for
resorting to delayed passage is for causeit?
recognition if the conditions of statehood in international
(c) If not, navigation.
why not? Such passage enabled
recognized by the UNCLOS as excusable, i.e., for
international law are not fulfilled. Thus, from this the said ships to traverse the strait between one
the purpose of rendering assistance to persons or
standpoint, the distinction is not legally significant.part of the high seas to another. On June 7,
ship in distress, as provided in Article 18(2) of the
1997,ANSWER:
a warship of State Beta passed through the
UNCLOS. Hence, Beta's warship complied with
above-named strait. Instead of passing through
Note: The question
the international lawshould
normsrefer
on to recognition
right of innocentof
continuously
(a) No, State and Z didexpeditiously,
not violate itsthe ship delayed
obligations under
government
passage. not recognition of state because
its passage to render assistance to a ship of State
there is no such distinction in recognition ofthe United Nations Charter. It complied with the
Gamma which
resolution calling wasfordistressed
enforcement withaction
no one nearby
against
state.
Right to Transit and Innocent Passage (2004) State to assist. When confronted
X, because it sent a medical team.by Epsilon about the
II-B. En route to the tuna fishing grounds in the delay, Beta explained that the delay was due to
Reparations
Pacific Ocean,Agreement; Validityin(1992)
a vessel registered Country TWforce (b) No sanctions
majeure may be taken
in conformity against
with the Stateof
provision Z.
entered
No. 14: Thethe Balintang
JapaneseChannel northconfirmed
Government because it did not violate its
of Babuyan Article 18(2) of the 1982 Convention on the Law obligation under the
of
Island and with
that during special World
the Second hooks War,
and nets dragged
Filipinas United Nations Charter.
werethe Sea (UNCLOS). Seven months later, Epsilon
up red corals
among those found near as "comfort women" (orsuspended
conscripted (c) Compliance the right
with of
theinnocent
resolution calling for
prostitutes) for Japanese troops in enforcement action against Slate X does not
necessarily call for the sending of
fighting troops. Under Art 43 of the United
Nations Charter, compliance with the call for
enforcement action against State X has to be
made in accordance with a special agreement
with the Security Council and such agreement
shall govern the numbers and types of forces,
their degree of readiness and general locations,
and the nature of the facilities and assistance to
be supplied by members of the United Nations.
SUGGESTED ANSWER: An
INSTRUMENTALITY refers to any agency
of the national government not integrated
within the departmental framework, vested
with special functions or jurisdiction by law,
with some if not all corporate powers,
administering special funds, and enjoying
operational autonomy, usually through a
charter. (Iron and Steel Authority v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 102976, October 25,
1995)