Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3
4
5
Cross-Tabulation
• Monthly Income and Monthly Expense for Mobile
• Frequency of changing the SIM and Monthly Income
Chi Square Tests
• Age and Impact of Celebrities
• Monthly income and Monthly Expense
• Usage of SIM and Tariff Scheme.22
Correlation
• Correlation between Monthly expenditure and Age
• Correlation between Minutes Per Day And Age
• Correlation between SMS per day and Age
• Correlation between Tariff preference and Age
ANOVA
• Monthly Expenditure and Monthly Income
6
Monthly Income
2-5 times 5 7 2 0 14
>10 times 0 1 0 0 1
Total 25 58 11 5 99
Correlations
Impact of Inference:
Age Group celebrities We got the significant
Age Group Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
1 .104
.151
level as 0.104 and is
Sum of Squares and 10.190 1.080 greater than p-value
Cross-products
Covariance .103 .011
0.05. So there is
N 100 100 significant relationship
Impact of celebrities Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
.104
.151
1
between the variables.
Sum of Squares and 1.080 10.560
Cross-products
Covariance .011 .107
N 100 100
Chi-Square Tests
Inference:
Asymp. Sig. (2- We got the significant
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 18.323a 9 .032 level as .032 and is
Likelihood Ratio 16.743 9 .053
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.255 1 .004
less than p-value 0.05.
N of Valid Cases 100 So there is no
a. 10 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .65. significant relationship
between the variables.
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no significant relationship between Monthly income and monthly
expense.
H1: There is significant relationship between Monthly income and monthly expense.
10
Inference:
Chi-Square Tests
We got the significant
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
level as 0.005 and is
Pearson Chi-Square 18.425a 6 .005 much lesser than 0.05. So
Likelihood Ratio 17.262 6 .008 there is no significant
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.171 1 .075
relationship between the
N of Valid Cases 99
a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
variables.
count is .97.
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no significant relationship between Usage of SIM and Tariff
Scheme.
H1: There is significant relationship between Usage of SIM and Tariff
Scheme.
11
Correlations
Inference:
Monthly
The output confirms the result
Age Group Expenses of scatter plot has a
Age Group Pearson Correlation 1 -.030 significant negative
Sig. (1-tailed) .382 relationship exist between
N 100 100 monthly expenditure and age
Monthly Expenses Pearson Correlation -.030 1 (since r=-0.3). So p-value is
Sig. (1-tailed) .382 greater than 0.05 and it is
N 100 100 0.382. So we cannot reject the
null hypothesis.
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no relationship exist between monthly expenditure and age.
H1: There is relationship exist between monthly expenditure and age.
12
Correlations
Minutes per Inference:
Age Group day
Age Group Pearson Correlation 1 .141 The output confirms the result
Sig. (1-tailed) .081
of scatter plot has a
Sum of Squares and 10.190 3.140
Cross-products
significant negative
Covariance .103 .032 relationship exist between talk
N 100 100 time and age (since r=.141).
Minutes per day Pearson Correlation .141 1
So p-value is greater than
Sig. (1-tailed) .081
Sum of Squares and 3.140 48.840
0.05 and it is 0.141. So we
Cross-products can reject the null hypothesis.
Covariance .032 .493
N 100 100
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no relationship exist between talk time and age.
H1: There is relationship exist between talk time and age.
13
Correlations
SMS per
Age Group day
Inference:
Age Group Pearson Correlation 1 -.131
Sig. (1-tailed) .097
The output confirms the result of
Sum of Squares and 10.190 -3.760 scatter plot has a significant
Cross-products negative relationship exist
Covariance .103 -.038
between SMS per day and age
N 100 100
SMS per day Pearson Correlation -.131 1 (since r=-.131). So p-value is
Sig. (1-tailed) .097 greater than 0.05 and it is -
Sum of Squares and -3.760 81.040 0.131. So we cannot reject the
Cross-products
Covariance -.038 .819
null hypothesis.
N 100 100
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no relationship exist between SMS per day and age.
H1: There is relationship exist between SMS per day and age.
14
Correlations
Call Tariff Inference:
Age Group preference
The output confirms the result
Age Group Pearson Correlation 1 -.161
Sig. (1-tailed) .055
of scatter plot has a
Sum of Squares and 10.190 -3.000 significant negative
Cross-products relationship exist between
Covariance
N
.103
100
-.031
99
tariff preference and age
Call Tariff preference Pearson Correlation -.161 1 (since r=-.161). So p-value is
Sig. (1-tailed) .055 greater than 0.05 and it is -
Sum of Squares and -3.000 34.000
0.161. So we cannot reject the
Cross-products
Covariance -.031 .347
null hypothesis.
N 99 99
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no relationship exist between tariff preference and age.
H1: There is relationship exist between tariff preference and age.
15
Inference:
ANOVA
Here degree of freedom is
Monthly Expenses
3 and 96. Also here if p-
Between Groups
Sum of Squares
7.051
df
3
Mean Square
2.350
F
3.143
Sig.
.029
value obtained is less than
0.05 we can reject the null
Within Groups 71.789 96 .748
hypothesis. F(3,96)=3.143
Total 78.840 99
and p-value=0.029 which
is<0.05. So we can reject
the null hypothesis.
Hypothesis:
H0:Monthly expenditure and monthly income is same.
H1:Monthly expenditure and monthly income is not same.
16
Cross Tab
Monthly Income and Monthly Expense for Mobile
Here irrespective of Monthly income, most of the people spent `50-`400 per month.
Frequency of changing the SIM and Monthly Income
Here, irrespective of monthly income, most of the people have changed their SIM very less (0-2
times).
Chi-Square Test
Age and Impact of Celebrities
No significant relationship.
Monthly income and Monthly Expense
No Significant relationship.
Usage of SIM and Tariff Scheme
No Significant relationship.
17
Correlation
Correlation between Monthly expenditure and Age
Relationship exists between these two.
Correlation between Minutes Per Day And Age
Relationship exists between these two.
Correlation between SMS per day and Age
No relationship exists.
Correlation between Tariff preference and Age
No relationship exists.
ANOVA
Monthly Expenditure and Monthly Income
Significant relation between Monthly Expenditure and Monthly Income.
18