Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty whose presentations are chosen should be aware that they also are agreeing to
participate in the AAFP Assembly Online series.
Because presentations that are a part of the AAFP Assembly Online series will be
enduring materials, additional requirements and standards will be applied. As a result of
these additional requirements, an additional honorarium will be paid.
If your proposal is selected, your signature on the contract will indicate your agreement
to adhere to the additional stipulations listed below and will qualify you to receive the
additional honorarium.
1) The complete set of PowerPoint slides will be due to the AAFP on June 2. This
due date is earlier than that for presentations not selected for the AAFP
Assembly Online series; it accommodates the editorial and intellectual property
processes.
2) The slides will undergo a thorough edit to ensure that terminology and usage are
correct and that the content conforms to AMA style and ACCME requirements.
After this edit is completed, the slides will be returned to you to review changes
and answer queries. You will have one week to complete this review. The editing
process is collaborative, and you will be expected to engage with members of the
AAFP editorial staff to ensure timely completion.
3) Any images, tables, or figures in the slides that are not your original work and,
thus, you do not have copyright ownership of, will undergo an intellectual
property review. You will need to provide the source information for these items
after which the AAFP will contact the copyright owners and request permission to
use these items and pay any associated fees. If permission from the copyright
owners is declined, these slides will not be included in the AAFP Assembly
Online series.
4) The slides must be in the AAFP Scientific Assembly template and adhere to the
template style.
5) A set of 5 multiple choice questions and answers is required along with the
PowerPoint slides. Each answer should be found within your presentation.
Answers require a detailed explanation, and a reference to the slide they can be
found in.
Needs Assessment
It is estimated that as many as 23 million adults aged 20 or older have physiological
evidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), accounting for approximately 11.5% of the
adult population.1 However, only 2% (4.5 million adults) have reportedly been told by a
physician within the past 12 months that they had CKD. The 2009 National Health
Interview Survey reported that kidney disease is much more prevalent among poor
adults and those with less education; adults under the age of 65 covered by Medicaid –
and those with less than a high school education – have higher percentages of CKD.2
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), “kidney disease can be detected
earlier by standardized blood tests to estimate renal function and monitoring of urine
protein excretion. New drugs better control blood pressure and slow the rate of kidney
damage by about 50%.”3 Family physicians should conduct such blood tests as part of
routine screenings for patients with kidney disease, and many do. AAFP Practice Profile
data indicate that the majority of family physicians perform a variety of blood and urine
tests or collect the specimen and send to an outside lab; such tests include complete
blood count (CBC), Hemoglobin, dipstick urinalysis or urine microscopic exam.4
Screening and diagnosis of patients with CKD can help family physicians to classify
stages in the progression of the disease, which will allow them to better manage such
patients.
The National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI)
workgroup defines the criteria for CKD as having:5
• Kidney damage for more than three months, as defined by structural or functional
abnormalities of the kidney, with or without glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
o This may manifest as pathological abnormalities or blood/urine/imaging
markers of kidney disease.
• OR having GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.732 for more than three months, with or
without kidney damage.
Patients are either determined to be at increased risk (defined by GFR greater than 90),
or are stratified into five stages ranging from kidney damage with normal or high GFR to
kidney failure (also known as end-stage renal disease, or ESRD). If the disease
progresses to ESRD, patients are referred for dialysis or consideration for a kidney
transplant.5 However, patients must be considered “medically suitable” for a transplant,
and as such, they undergo an extensive evaluation to determine certain eligibility
requirements, which includes identifying the presence of co-morbid conditions, such
as:6,7
o Hematologic abnormalities such as anemia
o Upper and lower gastrointestinal tract abnormalities (such as gastritis, peptic
ulcer disease or diverticular disease)
o Viral hepatitis B or C
o Cardiovascular diseases or conditions such as hypertension or past myocardial
infarction
o Infections such as tuberculosis or osteomyelitis
Transplantation may also not be recommended for patients with a history of cancer,
immune dysfunction or generally unhealthy lifestyles (such as smoking or alcohol or
drug abuse).7 Alternative treatment options (such as dietary modifications and certain
medications) and end-of-life care should therefore be discussed with patients who not
qualify as kidney transplant recipients or who choose not to undergo hemodialysis. As
with other progressive and life-threatening illnesses, family physicians are uniquely
positioned to initiate important communication with patients and their families as they
approach ESRD. They can help patients and family members/caretakers to select
appropriate palliative care options when necessary, as well as guide them through the
complexities of the healthcare system. Because the rates of ESRD are much higher
among black and Native American populations,6 family physicians should exercise
culturally competent care in all interactions with patients and families as well.
According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK), the five primary diseases causing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were
diabetes, hypertension, glomerulonephritis, cystic kidney and urologic diseases.1
Current clinical practice guidelines recommend including treatment of co-morbidities
(specifically for cardiovascular disease) along with treatment of CKD to slow the
progression of the disease and prevent complications.5 If caught early enough, it may
be possible to restore some kidney function using more aggressive treatment and
management of conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and advanced forms of
cardiovascular disease. Thirty years ago, one-third of diabetic patients were destined to
develop kidney failure; now, fewer than 10% of diabetic patients with good care develop
kidney failure, presumably because of enhanced methods of screening, diagnosis and
treatment that have led to earlier interventions for kidney disease.3
Anemia is a common complication of CKD and ESRD, and although therapeutic options
primarily focus on treatment of kidney disease, erythropoietin-stimulating agents may be
indicated for use in some patients. It should be noted, however, that the use of such
agents remains controversial; some studies report a poor response to treatment,
significant side effects and decreased long-term effectiveness (in some cases, even
shorter survival rates).9,10 Erythropoietin-stimulating agents can increase blood pressure
and the risk for thromboembolic complications; hemoglobin levels should also be
checked monthly during therapy, and iron supplementation may also be warranted for
patients undergoing treatment.11
Treatment for even moderate anemia is usually indicated in patients with chronic illness,
including older adults. While some exceptions may apply to extremely ill patients or
those at the end of life who decline therapeutic interventions, one source notes that
even “in patients with renal failure who are receiving dialysis and in patients with cancer
who are undergoing chemotherapy, correction of anemia up to hemoglobin levels of
12g/dL is associated with an improvement in the quality of life.” Some research has
shown that patients with end-stage renal disease, for example, experience benefits from
iron treatment to improve hemoglobin levels.10 Further, the KDOQI guidelines
recommend that patients with anemia of CKD should aim to receive therapy that places
hemoglobin targets within 11 to 12 g/dL, not to exceed 13g/dL.12 It should be noted,
however, that ongoing research into the safety and effectiveness of treatments for
patients with anemia of chronic disease is being conducted.
Because of the high prevalence of kidney disease in the U.S., and the rising number of
patients that family physicians see with CKD, especially related to conditions such as
diabetes and hypertension, it is imperative that they be familiar with the KDOQI
guidelines for classifying patients in order to begin appropriate interventions. In cases
where patients require referral to sub-specialists for advanced testing, evaluation or
treatment (including hemodialysis or kidney transplantation), family physicians are
uniquely positioned to orchestrate patient care, assist family members/caregivers with
guidance and resources needed to navigate complexities of the healthcare system, and
provide ongoing treatment and follow-up.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this session, participants will be able to:
1. Incorporate the major points of the National Kidney Foundation Quality
Outcomes Initiative for chronic kidney disease (CKD) into practice.
2. Accurately identify, screen, evaluate and classify patients who are at risk or have
the diagnosis of CKD.
3. Reduce the risk for progression of CKD to ESRD by applying appropriate, proven
therapeutic interventions early in the disease process.
4. Compare management strategies for anemia, bone disease, malnutrition, and
electrolyte abnormalities in the later stages of CKD.
References:
1. Kidney and Urologic Diseases Statistics for the United States. National Kidney and Urologic
Diseases Information Clearinghouse (NKUDIC). National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases (NIDDKD). Available at
http://kidney.niddk.nih.gov/kudiseases/pubs/kustats/index.htm
2. Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2009 CDC Vital and
Health Statistics, Series 10, No. 249 National Center for Health Statistics. August 2010. Available
at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_249.pdf
3. Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Fact Sheet. March
2009. Available at http://www.nih.gov/about/researchresultsforthepublic/kidney.pdf
4. Practice Profile II Survey. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). November 2009.
5. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification and
Stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI). National Kidney Foundation,
2002. Available at http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_ckd/p1_exec.htm
7. Kidney Transplant. MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. National Library of Medicine. June 2009.
Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003005.htm
11. Weiss B, ed. Common Renal Conditions. FP Essentials™ 375, AAFP. August 2010. Leawood,
Kan.
12. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in
Chronic Kidney Disease: 2007 Update of Hemoglobin Target. National Kidney Foundation. 2007.
Available at http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_anemiaUP/index.htm