Amelia Sauceda Verification Fraud in Lee County-June-2010-110503

AMELIA
SAUCEDA
ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT FOR BANK
OF NY MELLON, HSBC, BANK OF NY, US
BANK, BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING,
WELLS FARGO AND MAYBE MORE
THIS EXPOSE’ EXHIBITS SEVERAL
VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT AFFIDAVITS IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS FORECLOSURE
COMPLAINTS FILED WITHIN THE 20TH CIRCUIT
ROCKET DOCKET OF FLORIDA IN JUNE OF 2010
Original Document release 5/1/2011
This edit was reformatted to allow easier viewing in a more user friendly format
The creation of this document was intended to shed light on one of the many questionable
practices found in the foreclosure industry. Does one really believe Amelia Sauceda is the
Assistant Vice President for all of the banks she signs affidavits for or just a front for another
entity. The affidavits exhibited herein were filed within the 20th Circuit Court of Florida also
known as the ROCKET DOCKET. Any individual whose Verification of Complaint affidavit was
signed by Amelia Sauceda should be aware of this information. Please post your affidavits or
case numbers and filing locations online so the courts and the public will see what is happening
to our justice system in your name.
AMELIA SAUCEDA IS THE ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT FOR THE FOLLOWING BANKS; BANK OF NY
MELLON, HSBC, BANK OF NY, US BANK, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, WELLS FARGO ETC. HERE ARE
JUST A FEW VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE 20TH CIRCUIT IN FLORIDA
THE LEE COUNTY ROCKET DOCKET LOCATED IN THE 20 TH CIRCUIT OF
FLORIDA ACCEPTED THE FOLLOWING VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT
AFFIDAVITS IN SUPPORT OF FORECLOSURE COMPLAINTS WITHOUT
NOTICING THAT THE AFFIANT WORKS FOR SEVERAL BANKS AS AVP!
SOME OF THE AFFIDAVITS WERE NOTARIZED BUT MOST WERE NOT.
Page 1 of 18
Page 2 of 18
Page 3 of 18
Page 4 of 18
Page 5 of 18
Page 6 of 18
Page 7 of 18
Page 8 of 18
Page 9 of 18
Page 10 of 18
Page 11 of 18
Page 12 of 18
Page 13 of 18
Page 14 of 18
Page 15 of 18
Page 16 of 18
Final Comments on the “MEET WATSON” Verification of

Complaint Boiler Plate Form
1. In Paragraph one the affiant, Amelia Sauceda uses the term,

“personally familiar”. It avers that as an employee of BAC Home Loan
Servicing, L.P. F/K/A Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., she is
familiar with the loan. If true then she is also familiar with loans from a
half dozen other financial institutions and holders of MBS’s etc. The
language in each separate affidavit in support of these foreclosure
complaints contradicts one another, thus rendering each one invalid
through contradiction.
2. In Paragraph one the affiant, Amelia Sauceda avers that she has
read the Complaint. Does anyone know how long it would take to read
and verify a complaint of average length? Does anyone know how many
VOC affidavits she signed on any given day? After reading the
complaint which database would she access to verify the complaint with
what she just read? It probably depends on the bank she is verifying for;
BAC, U.S. Bank, NY Mellon, Wells etc.
3. In Paragraph two the affiant, Amelia Sauceda avers that, “The
Plaintiff is entitled to enforce the subject loan.” If Amelia Sauceda had
read and understood the Plaintiffs Complaint and she was familiar with
Florida Law, specifically, The MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE FORM
1.944 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provides specific
requirements for submitting a mortgage foreclosure complaint to the
court. The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.944(3) state that the
Plaintiff must allege that the “Plaintiff owns and holds the note and
mortgage.” This was not the case in 10-ca-056111, but she signed the
Page 17 of 18
affidavit anyway. Furthermore, by not attaching the written
authorization of the true party with standing to bring suit, a failure to
comply with 1.130(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure occurs.
The appearance of haste to sign all these affidavits is evident in her short
curved squiggle she uses as a signature.
4. In Paragraph three the affiant, Amelia Sauceda avers that, “A
payment default has occurred and no subsequent payments have been
made.” Complaints often are filed without the necessary payment log
documentation attachments as required by Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure 1.130(a), but this doesn’t slow down the Rocket Docket or
Amelia in signing these affidavits.
5. In Paragraph four the affiant, Amelia Sauceda avers that, “All
conditions precedent have been “MEET” prior to the institution of this
action.” Pardon the typo and focus on the intent of this statement. It
intends to claim all the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure have been met
in accordance with the filing of the complaint she is verifying. I won’t
bore you with an exhaustive critique of this averment as plainly in many
cases there are obvious omissions and false claims.
6. Finally, In Paragraph five the affiant, Amelia Sauceda avers that,
“Plaintiff has obligated itself to pay the Law Offices of Marshall C.
Watson…” Who is she averring will pay Marshall C. Watson? FNMA,
the one authorized to bring suit or BAC the servicer who is listed on the
Complaint as Plaintiff?
If anyone has any affidavits signed by Amelia Sauceda or any
information about her job duties or who she really works for that seem
legally problematic, post them and maybe we’ll get to the bottom of this
fraud.
Page 18 of 18

Amelia Sauceda Verification Fraud in Lee County-June-2010-110503

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Amelia Sauceda Verification Fraud in Lee County-June-2010-110503

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

AMELIA

SOME OF THE AFFIDAVITS WERE NOTARIZED BUT MOST WERE NOT.

Final Comments on the “MEET WATSON” Verification of

1. In Paragraph one the affiant, Amelia Sauceda uses the term,

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi