0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
54 vues3 pages
ABC Company planned to launch its new dream car models X and Y in 2001. Bookings for the models were successful, with over 80% for model X. Delivery was delayed due to problems with the air conditioning (AC) accessories supplier, Z Limited. Z Limited also supplies AC accessories to Nissan, a competitor of ABC. ABC officials allege that Z Limited is delaying AC accessory supply to ABC under pressure from Nissan, in order to give Nissan an advantage. If not resolved, ABC will switch from Z Limited to supplier K for model X AC accessories.
ABC Company planned to launch its new dream car models X and Y in 2001. Bookings for the models were successful, with over 80% for model X. Delivery was delayed due to problems with the air conditioning (AC) accessories supplier, Z Limited. Z Limited also supplies AC accessories to Nissan, a competitor of ABC. ABC officials allege that Z Limited is delaying AC accessory supply to ABC under pressure from Nissan, in order to give Nissan an advantage. If not resolved, ABC will switch from Z Limited to supplier K for model X AC accessories.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
ABC Company planned to launch its new dream car models X and Y in 2001. Bookings for the models were successful, with over 80% for model X. Delivery was delayed due to problems with the air conditioning (AC) accessories supplier, Z Limited. Z Limited also supplies AC accessories to Nissan, a competitor of ABC. ABC officials allege that Z Limited is delaying AC accessory supply to ABC under pressure from Nissan, in order to give Nissan an advantage. If not resolved, ABC will switch from Z Limited to supplier K for model X AC accessories.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Case- Study One company ABC opens outlets from different model of their dream car in the year 2000. The consumer response was overwhelming. The bookings were mainly for the Ac model X and Y. The X model accounted for more than 80% of the booking. ABC has planned to commence delivery of the vehicle by early 2001. Meanwhile delivery schedules of their Ac model were upset due to some problems on the role of front. As per report in times in 2000 ABC official told about delay that is non - availability of (Ac) accessories. The Z limited supply (Ac) accessories for the X model and K is the vendor Y for version. Incidentally Z limited also supplies the Ac to NISSAN. The ABC official alleged that Z limited is creating pressure through the competitors to delay the supply of (Ac) accessories. Now if suppose this continues, we will be forced to ask K to supply Ac accessories for the X version as well, our top official said. Ques.1-Analyse the ethical issues involved in this case. Ques.2- If you think that the eligation about the supplier is right, justify it.
Date-14-dec-2008 Munawar Ali
(08/MBA/33) Summary:- ABC Company is a automatic company and it is planning its dream car. X and Y is the Ac model of the car and the car response was very effective. ABC Company announced to launch the vehicle in early 2001. But due to the supplying of the Ac accessories by Z ltd to ABC is not proper so the launching of the car is being delayed. As the Z is also a vendor of NISSAN the competitor of ABC car and delay in supply of the accessories is due to forcing of its competitor. Finally the ABC officials decided to have accessories from K limited. Ques.1- The ethical issues presented in the case as follows, 1) The business ethic of ABC Company that delaying of Ac accessories from Z limited is because of competitor ship from Nissan as Nissan is forcing Z limited to delay the delivery of Ac accessories. So the dis- honest competitor ship is presented in this case. 2) ABC Company announced the launching of their car in early 2001 but because of delay in accessories they are unable to perform their commitment. Ques.2- As per the case says the eligation about the supplier is right because Z limited is the vendor of accessories to ABC and NISSAN so they have to treat them both equally limited is delaying the delivery to ABC under the force of the NISSAN cause of the competitor ship and ABC unable to perform their commitment to people.