Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ROC(D)
Vol. 12, No. 3, 2002. pp. 100-105
*Department of Chemistry
National Kaohsiung Normal University
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
**Graduate Institute of Science Education
National Kaohsiung Normal University
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate the difficulties students have in learning electrochemistry.
The answers on an open-ended test on electrochemistry obtained from 9th graders, 12th graders, and college
chemistry major students were compared and analyzed. The results of frequency analyses of student misconceptions
and data from interviews revealed that a larger percentage of college students had misconceptions about the function
of electrolytes in an electrochemical cell than did 9th or 12th graders. This study indicates that advanced study
in chemistry does not always result in better understanding of certain basic concepts. More importantly, if the
concepts are not clearly explained, students’ misconceptions may become firm and remain during their continued
study of chemistry even at the college level. It is also found that the students’ misconceptions likely result from
wrong impression given by pictures and statements in textbooks and improper classroom instructions.
I. Introduction the salt bridge and the electrolyte solution transfer electrons
from the cathode to the anode, and that the half-cell potential
Electrochemistry has been regarded as one of the most is an intrinsic property that can be used to predict the
difficult subjects to learn for both students and teachers spontaneity of an individual cell. In addition to the assess-
(Finley, Stewart, & Yarroch, 1982; Johnstone, 1980). As ment for misconceptions, Sanger & Greenbowe (1997a)
Butts & Smith (1987) indicated, secondary school students reported that proper computer animations aimed at dealing
find that electrochemical cells and electrolytic cells are very with misconceptions could reduce the number of students
difficult for them to understand since these topics involve who kept them.
concepts about electricity and oxidation-reduction, both of In a review of the literatures, we found that student
which are very challenging. misconceptions in electrochemistry are numerous and varied.
If chemistry teachers can diagnose students’ difficul- In general, students start to learn some basic concepts of
ties in learning, and the origins of their misconceptions, electrochemistry, including oxidations, reductions, cathodes,
then their teaching effectiveness could be greatly improved. anodes, electrolytes, salt bridges, and electrical current etc.,
In the 1980s, quite a few studies focused on the assessment at the age of 15 (i.e., 9th grade). They continue to study
of student misconceptions in chemistry (Hackling & Garnett, advanced concepts, including the standard reduction
1985; Gorodetsky & Gussarsky, 1986; Mitchell & Gunstone, potential, electromotive force, and half-cell reactions in the
1984). In the 1990s, a number of researchers (Garnett & 12th grade. In college, students are exposed to the principles
Treagust, 1992a, 1992b; Ogude & Bradley, 1994; Sanger of electrochemical cells in general chemistry course in
& Greenbowe, 1997a, 1997b) diagnosed student miscon- greater depth and detail. We were curious about and
ceptions in electrochemistry. It was found that the most examined the growth of student understanding of the basic
common misconceptions included the ideas that electrons principles of electrochemistry. We also tried to identify
flow through a salt bridge and electrolyte solutions to the common misconceptions that occur in students of
complete an electrical circuit, that anions and cations in different levels. In addition, we explored the reasons for
− 100 −
Students’ Difficulties in Electrochemistry
students’ learning difficulties in electrochemistry. chemical cell with a regular salt bridge and an electrochemi-
cal cell with a copper wire used to connect the two half
II. Methodology cells. In a study by Ogude & Bradley (1994), a cell con-
taining a copper wire showed no voltage at all. This was
An open-ended paper-pencil test containing four items mainly because no ions could carry an electrical charge
(see Appendix) was used to assess students’ understanding through the wire to complete the circuit. We, however,
in the concepts of oxidation, reduction, and electrochem- were surprised by finding a net reading of 0.6 V in a similar
istry and to assess their explanations. experiment. Why we obtained results different from those
Item 1 asked the students to predict whether there was of Ogude & Bradley (1994) needs further examination. For
electric current in a cell containing Zn and Cu electrodes this item, a reasonable prediction is that the electrochemical
and 1.0 M CuSO4 as electrolyte. In addition, students were cell with a regular salt bridge can provide a higher voltage
asked to explain the reasons for their prediction. Apparently, reading than the cell with a copper wire. A sound expla-
the diagram used for Item 1 was different from a typical nation would be that the ions can carry electrical charges
diagram of a Galvanic cell shown in most high school or through the salt bridge to complete the electrical circuit,
college chemistry textbooks. It consisted of a single cell while the cell with copper wire does not have the same
with two electrodes and no salt bridge. The two electrodes conductive capacity and mechanism.
in the same beaker were connected by a wire and immersed Item 4 discerned students’ understanding of the dif-
in the same electrolyte. The correct prediction of this item ference in the voltage reading between a chemical cell with
should be that electrical current flows through this cell since Zn and Cu electrodes and a cell with two graphite electrodes.
the electrons move from the Zn electrode to the Cu electrode It is apparent that there will be no voltage reading for the
through the external wire and the cations in the solution later cell. This is because no oxidation or reduction will
gain electrons that are plated onto the electrode. The elec- occur. In contrast, the electrochemical cell with Zn and
trolyte conducts electricity within the cell through the action Cu electrodes could have a net voltage reading resulting
of dissolving ions. The movement of ions completes the from the oxidation of Zn and the reduction of Cu2+.
circuit and maintains electrical neutrality. Despite the fact In order to identify the conceptual difficulties that
that there is only one cell but no salt bridge, the electrical high school and the college students have, the same test
circuit is still complete in such a cell. A voltage meter was administered to 182 9th graders, 75 college-bound 12th
shown in the external circuit will detect the electromotive graders, and 49 senior college students whose major was
force. We conducted the experiment and found that a chemistry. The 9th graders were picked from six classes
reading of 1.0 volt was shown on the meter. In addition, in three high schools. The 12th graders were from two
the zinc electrode gradually dissolved in the CuSO4 solution. classes in two high schools, who had taken a curriculum
Solid copper resulting from the reduction of Cu2+ was based on science or engineering. All the students who
observed at the copper electrode and on the bottom of the participated in this study had learned the concepts that were
beaker. The oxidation-reduction reaction lasted for about examined in the test. A longitudinal comparison of 9th,
20 minutes. 12th, and senior college students’ conceptual difficulties
Item 2 asked the students what would happen if the can help teachers understand what concepts are often
electrolyte consisting of 1.0 M CuSO4 was replaced with misunderstood by students of different levels. In addition,
electrolyte consisting of 1.0 M ZnSO4 in the cell shown for the purpose of exploring possible sources of and reasons
in Item 1. A prediction that the indicator of the voltage for student learning difficulties, three students from each
meter would move was considered correct. Explanations of the three levels who made wrong predictions and wrote
that were consistent with the following statements are inappropriate explanations were randomly selected for a
considered to indicate sound understanding. The ions of semi-structured interview. Each of them was individually
Zn2+ in the electrolyte accept electrons and reduce to Zn. interviewed for thirty minutes to solicit further explanations
As a result, the cathode becomes coated with Zn, and the of and reasons for their predictions. All the interviews were
current stops. Then, no further oxidation-reduction reaction audio-taped and transcribed.
or electromotive force is observed in the cell since the two
electrodes have the same standard reduction potential. When III. Results
we carried out this experiment, we found that the initial
voltage reading was 1.0 V. The reaction went on slowly Table 1 shows the percentages of students who made
and lasted for more than 16 hours with a reading of wrong predictions or gave wrong explanations for test Items
0.9 V. 1 and 2. It can be seen that two major misconceptions were
Item 3 discerned students’ understanding of the dif- consistently held by the three grade levels of students. The
ference in the voltage reading between a typical electro- first one concerned the function of a salt bridge. 17.6%
− 101 −
H.S. Lin et al.
of the 9th graders, 9.3% of the 12th graders, and 12.2% a copper wire, the net voltage will remain unchanged. They
of the senior college students thought that a salt bridge was thought that the function and principle of the salt bridge
indispensable for a galvanic for having a close circuit. They are the same as those of the copper wire. In fact, the copper
believed that without a salt bridge, the cell could not work wire does not contain ions dissociated from the electrolyte
properly. inside the salt bridge. The ions play the important role of
Another major misconception held by the three groups carrying electrical charges to complete the electrical circuit.
of students concerned the type of electrolyte used in a Although copper is a conductor, it conducts electrons instead
Galvanic cell. About 10.8% of the junior high students, of ions. In this case, there are no electrons going through
9.3% of the senior high students, and 53.1% of the college the solution (Ogude & Bradley, 1994). Apparently, the
students explained that if the electrolyte does not contain copper wire is not able to transfer ions as the salt bridge
the cation of the cathode (i.e., Cu2+ for the Cu cathode), does since there is no electrolyte in it.
then the cell will not have any electromotive force. We The major misconception of the students revealed by
were surprised that more than one-half of the college students Item 4 was that even if the Zn and Cu electrodes were
who were majoring in chemistry held the same miscon- replaced with two carbon bars, the cell would still create
ceptions as the secondary school students did. While the a net voltage. We were surprised by that 36.7% of the
reasons they gave were different from those given by the college students held this misconception.
secondary school students, the college students firmly held It should also be noted that 4.9% of the 9th graders,
the same misconceptions. 5.3% of the 12th graders, and 6.1% of the college students
Table 2 presents the percentages of students who had did not understand the difference between an electrochemi-
major misconceptions as revealed by test Items 3 and 4. cal cell and an electrolytic cell. An electrochemical cell
For Item 3, 19.8% of the 9th graders, 8.0% of the 12th creates electrical current through the chemical reactions of
graders, and 14.3% of the college students believed that oxidation and reduction. In contrast, an electrolytic cell
if the salt bridge in an electrochemical cell is replaced with uses electrical current to decompose compounds into
− 102 −
Students’ Difficulties in Electrochemistry
− 103 −
H.S. Lin et al.
The finding that students typically believed that a salt neutrality in operating electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical
bridge is necessary in a Galvanic cell should be noted by Education, 71(1), 29-34.
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997a). Common student miscon-
chemistry teachers. About one-sixth of the ninth graders, ceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentra-
one-tenth of the 12th graders, and one-eighth of the college tion cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377-398.
chemistry majors believed that a salt bridge is absolutely Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997b). Students’ misconceptions in
necessary in a Galvanic cell to create electromotive force. electrochemistry: Current flow in electrolyte solutions and the salt
The follow-up interviews revealed that these students’ bridge. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(7), 819-823.
conceptions were likely influenced by textbooks and class-
Appendix
room instructions. All the students who were interviewed
The Open-Ended Test Items 1 to 4
expressed that their explanations regarding the Galvanic
cell were based on the pictures and statements they had 1. In the following diagram, Zn and Cu electrodes are connected at one
seen and read, respectively, in textbooks and on their end by an electrical wire and a voltage meter. The other end of each
teachers’ instructions. It seems that textbook writers and electrodes is immersed into a solution consisting of 1.0 M CuSO4. Do
chemistry teachers should be particularly careful when you think the voltage meter will show a reading or not? Please explain
explaining the structure and principles of a Galvanic cell. as well as you can.
After introducing examples of Galvanic cells, open discus-
sion and further practice in designing a variety of Galvanic
cells might help students construct their own understanding
and to try out their own hypotheses. In addition, introducing
the students to Volta’s 1799 experiment may reduce the
number of students who hold the typical misconceptions
since Volta did not use any salt bridge in his demonstration
of the electrochemical cell. Further studies on applying
conceptual change teaching approaches are encouraged.
Acknowledgment
− 104 −
Students’ Difficulties in Electrochemistry
!"#$%#&'()*
! ! !
* * * **
*
!"#$%&%'
**
!"#$%&%'()*+
!"#$!%&'()*(+,-(./0123)456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGBH
!"#$%&$'($)*+,-./01234(5678!"9:;<=>?&$'($)*
! !"#$%&' !"#$%&'( )*+,-&./0123456789':;*<=+
!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789':;<"#$=>?@834'AB<CD8
!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=)>(?@) !ABCDEFGH
!"#$%&'(')*
− 105 −