Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Disclaimer
Because USP text and publications may have legal implications in the U.S. and
elsewhere, their language must stand on its own. The USP shall not provide an
official ex post facto interpretation to one party, thereby placing other parties without
that interpretation at a possible disadvantage. The requirements shall be uniformly
and equally available to all parties.
In addition, USP shall not provide an official opinion as to whether a particular article
does or does not comply with compendial requirements, except as part of an
established USP verification or other conformity assessment program that is
conducted separately from and independent of USP's standard-setting activities.
2
Topics
• Definition
• Application
• Development of predictive dissolution method
- Selection of testing conditions
• Summary
feces tissue
4
Definition of Dissolution Rate
• Tablets
• Capsules
• Suspensions
• Ointments
• Creams
• Suppositories
• Pessaries
• Transdermals
• Implants
6
Goals of a Predictive Dissolution Testing
• Drug substance:
– Solubility in physiological relevant media
– Permeability
– Stability
Class 3 Class 4
high solubility low solubility
low permeability low permeability8
Factors Influencing Bioavailability
• Drug product:
– Excipients
• Presence of solubility enhancers
– Composition
• Viscosity
• Molecular weight
– Manufacturing
• Particle size
• Addition order
• Moisture
• Lubrication blend time
• Compression force
• Drying methods
• Coating
9
Method Development
10
Method Development
11
• <711> Dissolution
• <724> Drug Release
• <1092> The Dissolution Procedure: Development
and Validation
• <701> Disintegration
• <1087> Intrinsic Dissolution
• <1088> In vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Dosage
Forms
• <1090> In vivo Bioequivalence Guideline
• Monographs
12
Development of Dissolution Test
• selection of suitable
dissolution apparatus
• consideration of known
factors pH 1 – 3 fasted
- pH-value pH 4.5 – 5.5 (food intake)
- concentration of salts
- volume pH 4.9 -6.5
- temperature pH 6.6
- addition of enzymes
- addition of bile salts
13
14
USP Apparatus 1 - Basket
15
• Drug product
– Solids (mostly floating)
• Monodisperse (tablets)
• Polydisperse (encapsulated beads)
• Agitation
– Rotating stirrer
– Usual speed: 50 to 100 rpm
• Disadvantage
– Formulation may clog to 40 mesh screen
16
USP Apparatus 2 - Paddle
17
• Drug product
– Solids (mostly non floating)
• Monodisperse (tablets)
• Polydisperse (encapsulated beads)
• Agitation
– Rotating stirrer
– Usual speed: 25 to 75 rpm
• Disadvantages
– Floating dosage forms require sinker
– Cone formation
– Positioning of tablet
18
Paddle/ Basket Dissolution Apparatus
• Advantages
– Widely accepted apparatus for dissolution test
– Apparatus of first choice for solid oral dosage forms
– Standardized
– Easy to operate
– Robust
– Broad experience
• Disadvantages
– Limited volume
– Simulation of the gastrointestinal transit not possible
– Hydrodynamic conditions not known
19
20
USP Apparatus 3 - Reciprocating Cylinder
• Drug products
– Solids (mostly non disintegrating)
• Monodisperse (tablets)
• Polydisperse (encapsulated beads)
– Originally used for extended release products, particularly
beads in capsule
• Reciprocating agitation
– Reciprocating cylinder
– Usual speed 5 to 35 rpm (reciprocations per minute)
• Disadvantages
– Disintegrating dosage forms too low results
– Surfactant cause foaming
– Small volume 21
• Advantages
– Reciprocating cylinder programmed for
dissolution in various media for various
time
– Can change the media easily
– May start at pH 1 and then pH 4.5 and
then at pH 6.8
– Attempt to mirror pH changes and
transit times in the GI tract
22
USP Apparatus 4 - Flow Through Cell
23
24
Flow-through Cell Apparatus
• Advantages
– No limitation regarding the volume of media used for the
dissolution test
– Suitable for low soluble drugs
– Gentle hydrodynamic conditions
– Simulation of the gastrointestinal transit
– Suitable for special dosage forms
• Powder and granules
• Implants
• Disadvantages
– Limited experience
– Pump precision influences the results
– Fractioned primary data lead to greater experimental
error when computed to cumulative profiles 25
26
USP Apparatus 5 - Paddle Over Disk
28
USP Apparatus 6 - Cylinder
29
30
USP Apparatus 7 - Reciprocating
Holder
31
32
Vertical Diffusion Cell
33
E4
• Advantages
– Good simulation of the masticatory
activity
– Easy to use
• Disadvantages
– Apparatus not commercially
available
– Limited experience
– Limited volume 34
Slide 34
• Dissolution medium
– Sink conditions with regard to API
– Appropriate with regard to physiology
– Well characterized composition
– No organic solvents
– De-gassing if necessary
– Stable
– Environmental friendly
– ….
35
• Time points
– Immediate-release dosage forms
• The duration of the procedure is typically 30 to 60 minutes
• USP may have a single time point specification
• FDA may require additional time points for
– Product comparability
– Product registration
– Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)
• See FDA Guidance
• Drug product should release 85% or more of the active drug
substance within 15 minutes
• Single time point specification
36
Development Of A Dissolution Method
• Time points
– A sufficient number of time points should be selected to
adequately characterize the ascending and plateau
phases of the dissolution curve
– IR Products
• Dissolution profiles of immediate-release products typically
show a gradual increase reaching 85% to 100% at about 30
to 45 minutes
• Dissolution time points in the range of 15, 20, 30, 45, and 60
minutes are usual for most immediate-release products.
• For rapidly dissolving products, including suspensions,
useful information may be obtained from earlier points, e.g.,
5 to 10 minutes.
37
• Time points
– Slower dissolving drugs and modified release drug
products
• Time points later than 60 minutes may be useful
• May have time points in two different media
– Delayed release or enteric drug products
– Example: Diclofenac Sodium Delayed Release Tablets
– Acid stage (0.1N HCl) for 2 hr
– Buffer stage (Phosphate buffer, pH 6.8) for 45 min.
• At least three test time points are chosen to characterize the
in vitro drug release profile
38
Development Of A Dissolution Method
39
• Stirring rate
– Basket Apparatus: 100 rpm
– Paddle Apparatus: 50 rpm or 75 rpm
• Suspensions: 25 rpm
• Extended release formulations: 100 rpm
– Reciprocating Cylinder Apparatus
• 5 dips/min – 35 dips/min
• Temperature
– Orally administered drugs: 37°C
– Topical/ transdermals: 32°C
42
Sampling Time Points
• Immediate-release formulations
– Development: profiles to characterize the dissolution
pattern (e.g. 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min)
– QC: 15 min, 30 min, up to 60 min
– Rapidly dissolving products: 5 min or 10 min
• Modified release formulations
– Delayed release formulations
• Acidic stage: 1 h or 2 h
• Buffer stage: similar to IR formulations
– Extended release formulations
• One early time point: 1 or 2 hours
• Intermediate time point: 4 or 5 hours
• Final time point e.g. 8, 12 or 24 hours
43
Relevant Guidelines
• FDA
– Guidance for Industry: Dissolution Testing of Immediate
Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms, 1997
– SUPAC
– Guidance for Industry: Extended Release Solid Oral Dosage
Forms: Development, Evaluation and Application of in vitro/
in vivo Correlations, 1997
– Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products - General
Considerations, 2000
46
Relevant Guidelines
• FIP
– Guidelines to Dissolution/ in vitro Release Testing of
Novel/Special Dosage Forms, 2003
– Guidelines for Dissolution Testing of Solid Oral Products,
1997
47
• Advanced Dissolution
– In-depth review of USP dissolution and drug release testing,
covering method development, analytical instrument
qualification, and method validation.
• http://www.usp.org/education/classroom.html
48
Questions?
49
Thank You!
50