Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
of Performance
4.5 Discussion
A secondary variable, distinctive to a contra-rotating
turbine, is that of inter-rotor spacing. The rotor design
assumed that the rotors are in close proximity, and
function as a single actuator disc as far as blade
element theory is concerned. Correct inter-rotor
spacing is therefore critical to ensure efficient
operation of the overall system through minimisation
of swirl and wake turbulence.
Figures 2 and 3 detail the effects of variation in blade Figure 4: Simple FLUENT CFD comparison of
spacing to achieve a good match between rotor sets. vorticity for a dual and single rotor tidal turbine
A reduction in performance is noted when the blade in a tidal stream of 1.5ms-1 velocity.
5.2 Blade Structural Analysis
The mechanical performance of the larger 1/10th
scale turbine blade was assessed by Finite Element
Analysis (FEA) to ensure sufficient strength for the
forces encountered, and with regard to fatiguing.
Several models were produced as the design
developed, the final comprising three integrated
components, namely: the spar, the outer skin, and the
solid fill.
The stepped stainless steel spar was modelled using
3 node beam elements beam189 with ANSYS [17].
The solid volume of the turbine blade was modelled
as a 3D volume and meshed using 10 node
isoparametric tetrahedral solid elements, solid92. The
trailing edge of the blade is truncated to minimise
meshing problems. The effect of this approximation Figure 6: Stainless steel spar – von Mises
on the structural response will be negligible. The solid
volume of the blade is formed from a fill of
equivalent stress.
microballoons and very slow epoxy resin. Isotropic
resin material properties were assumed.
The outer skin was modelled using 8 node
quadrilateral shell elements degenerated into 6 node
triangular shell elements, shown in Figure 5. The
outer skin consists of an anisotropic glass-carbon-
epoxy composite. This complex material was
approximated by a similar isotropic shell layer bonded
to the fill material.
Rotor 1
Disk Brake
Pitchable
Blade
Central Spine
Shaft
1 Revolution
10 Further Work
The work on CoRMaT continues with development in
a number of specific areas:
• Further testing of CoRMaT and refinement of its
1 Revolution
systems in a tidal stream over an extended
period of 8 months.
• Installation of a complete electrical power take-
off utilising direct-drive induction machinery
and power conditioning to provide grid-
Figure 14: Blade thrust and edgewise loadings compliant power.
(arbitrary units) recorded over time:: front rotors • Further flume and tow-tank tests with respect to
stationary, downstream rotating. the stability and dynamic properties of moored
and freely ‘flying’ turbines.
Figure 14 is a recording during the same test-run • Continued analysis and testing programme for
under similar conditions to those in Figure 13, except rotor blade materials to provide structural
that the upstream rotor (R1) has been stopped. integrity and resistance to the harsh marine
environment.
9.2 Discussion
In the test depicted in Figure 13, the speeds of the two
rotors are nearly equal. The shaft torques are also 11 Conclusions
similar, but not identical: the comparison here is
between 3 times the R1 edge loading, and 4 times the The benefits of a contra-rotating marine current
edge load for R2. Both edge traces show a once-per- turbine have been described and demonstrated with
revolution ripple from gravitational effects. reference to scaled tow-tank testing and sea-trials.
The upstream rotor R1 experienced periodic falls in its The experimental results confirm that it is possible
thrust loading due to interference from the front to offset marine turbine reactive torque (and hence
support frame (seen in Figure 12), which remained in mooring cost) by means of contra-rotation, although
place during this test. The wakes from the two lower further work is required to prove the robustness of the
arms of the frame seem to have merged to some sea-going prototype’s active hydraulic control.
extent. Power take-off data is in excellent agreement with
The downstream rotor R2 would be expected to show the predicted Cp values calculated by modified BEM
signs of disturbance from the 3-bladed rotor codes, for both the 1/30th and 1/10th scale CoRMaT.
immediately upstream, at a frequency of 3(f1 + f2), Power output data from the 1/10th scale CoRMaT was
where f1 and f2 are the rotational frequencies of the however limited by the weather during the test period,
two rotors. In this case where f1 and f2 are similar, and further testing in higher tidal currents is scheduled
disturbances should come approximately 6 times per to produce further confirmation of performance.
revolution. However, the thrust trace for R2 (Figure
13) seems to be dominated by a twice-per-revolution
effect, suggesting that (as for R1) the support frame Acknowledgements
was the culprit. It is difficult to detect any regular
disturbances for R2 at a higher frequency. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of
With rotor 1 stalled (Figure 14) disturbances to rotor 2 Scottish Enterprise Proof of Concept funding and the
should occur 3 times per revolution, and this effect is services of Seafarer Services Scotland.
clearly visible for both thrust and edge loads. The
interesting feature is the magnitude of cyclic thrust
loadings produced in passing through the wakes of the References
stationary blades. The conclusion from these tests is
that wakes from stationary bluff bodies are potentially [1] Black & Veatch, 18th July 2005: UK Tidal Stream
far more serious than the blade / blade interactions in a Energy Resource and Technology. Summary Report
properly functioning contra-rotating turbine: to the for the Carbon Trust.
extent of an order of magnitude in the cases presented www.thecarbontrust.co.uk/ctmarine3/res/PhaseIITidal
here. The consequences for rotors operating in close StreamResourceReport.pdf.
proximity to supporting structures are clear to see.
[2] Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU), 2001: UK [15] J. A. Clarke, G. Connor, A. D. Grant, C. M.
Energy Review. Johnstone and D. Mackenzie, 19 -25 August, 2006:
http://www.piu.gov.uk/2002/energy/report/index.htm Design and initial testing of a contra-rotating tidal
current turbine. Proceedings of the World Renewable
[3] Future Energy Solutions, 2003: Analysis for Energy Congress 2006, Florence, Italy.
Energy White Paper, using the MARKAL Model.
http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file10719.pdf [16] Somers D M, 1997: Design and experimental
TSO, ISBN 0-10-157612-9 results for the S814 airfoil. Airfoil Incorporated, State
College Pennsylvania, Subcontractor report
[4] UK Interdepartmental Analysts’ Group. DTI, NREL/SR-440-6019.
DEFRA, DfT, Treasury, Carbon Trust and Energy
Savings Trust. 2001. [17] ANSYS Version 10, ANSYS Inc., Canonsberg,
PA 15317; 2005.
[5] UK DTI, January 2006: UK Energy Review
Consultation Document. Annex B, pg 70.