FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano

Potential Failure Modes and
Effects Analysis
(Information Sheet)
PFMEA Number:
Process Name:
Process Responsibility:
Prepared By:
Affected Product(s):
PFMEA Key Date:
PFMEA Origination Date:
PFMEA Revision Date:
Core Team Members:

C
Process Potential Failure S l Potential O Current D R Responsible S O
Potential Failure Recommend Taken
# Function Modes (process E a Causes of C Process E P Person & E C
Effects (KPOVs) Actions Actions
(Step) defects) V s Failure (KPIVs) C Controls T N Target Date V C
s
Falla en boton
1 0 0 0
accionador
Falla en
2
Energizamiento
Falla en
3
Calibración
Falla en Panel
4
Control
10
11
12
13
14
15
C
s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
C
s
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C
s
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
C
s
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
C
s
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
C
s
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D R
E P
T N
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
Effect Criteria: Severity of Effect Defined Ranking
May endanger operator. Failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and / or
Hazardous:
involves noncompliance with government regulation. Failure will occur WITHOUT 10
Without Warning
warning.
May endanger operator. Failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and / or
Hazardous: With
involves noncompliance with government regulation. Failure will occur WITH 9
Warning
warning.
Major disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be scrapped.

Very High 8
Vehicle / item inoperable, loss of primary function. Customer very dissatisfied.
Minor disruption to production line. Product may have to be sorted and a portion
High (less than 100%) scrapped. Vehicle operable, but at a reduced level of 7
performance. Customer dissatisfied.
Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) may have to be
Moderate scrapped (no sorting). Vehicle / item operable, but some comfort / convenience 6
item(s) inoperable. Customers experience discomfort.
Minor disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be reworked.

Low Vehicle / item operable, but some comfort / convenience item(s) operable at 5
reduced level of performance. Customer experiences some dissatisfaction.
Minor disruption to production line. The product may have to be sorted and a
Very Low portion (less than 100%) reworked. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item does not 4
conform. Defect noticed by most customers.
Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) of the product may
Minor have to be reworked on-line but out-of-station. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item does 3
not conform. Defect noticed by average customers.
Minor disruption to production line. A portion (less than 100%) of the product may
Very Minor have to be reworked on-line but in-station. Fit / finish / squeak / rattle item does not 2
conform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers.
None No effect. 1
Probability of Failure Possible Failure Rates Cpk Ranking
Very High: ³ 1 in 2 < 0.33 10
Failure is almost inevitable 1 in 3 ³ 0.33 9
High: Generally associated with
1 in 8 ³ 0.51 8
processes similar to previous
processes that have often failed 1 in 20 ³ 0.67 7
Moderate: Generally associated

1 in 80 ³ 0.83 6
with processes similar to
previous processes which have 1 in 400 ³ 1.00 5
experienced occasional failures,
1 in 2,000 ³ 1.17 4
but not in major proportions
Low: Isolated failures associated

1 in 15,000 ³ 1.33 3
with similar processes
Very Low: Only isolated failures

associated with almost identical 1 in 150,000 ³ 1.5 2
processes
Remote: Failure is unlikely. No
failures ever associated with almost £ 1 in 1,500,000 ³ 1.67 1
identical processes
Detection Criteria: Liklihood the existence of a defect will be Ranking
detected by test content before product advances to
next or subsequent process
Almost Impossible Test content detects < 80 % of failures 10
Very Remote Test content must detect 80 % of failures 9

Remote Test content must detect 82.5 % of failures 8
Very Low Test content must detect 85 % of failures 7
Low Test content must detect 87.5 % of failures 6
Moderate Test content must detect 90 % of failures 5
Moderately High Test content must detect 92.5 % of failures 4
High Test content must detect 95 % of failures 3
Very High Test content must detect 97.5 % of failures 2
Almost Certain Test content must detect 99.5 % of failures 1
Steps in the FMEA Process
1. Select the Process FMEA 8. For each Process Inp
team that it can vary (cau
2. Develop a Process Map and identify associated F
identify all process steps and Effects
3. List all the Key Process 9. List all other Causes
Outputs to satisfy internal and variability) and asso
external customer and Effects
requirements 10. Assign Severity, Oc
4. For each Process Step, list Detection rating to e
Key Process Inputs 11. Calculate the risk pr
5. For the Process Define matrix (RPN) for each pote
relating Product Outputs to mode scenario
Process Variables 12. Determine recomme
6. Rank the inputs according to to reduce all RPNs
importance
Note: 13. Take appropriate
Note:When
Whendoing
doingaaProcess
ProcessFMEA,
FMEA,first
firstassume
assumethe
thematerial
materialisisgood,
good,bu
b
7.
bad. Start
Then the process
assume the FMEA
process is good, but the 14. Re-calculate
material is bad. Last,all RPN
assume
bad. Then assume the process is good, but the material is bad. Last, assum
unsafe.
unsafe.
ocess
ch Process Input, List ways
can vary (causes) and
y associated Failure Modes
ffects
l other Causes (sources of
ility) and associated FM’s
ffects
n Severity, Occurrence and
ion rating to each Cause
ate the risk priority number
for each potential failure
scenario
mine recommended actions
uce all RPNs
e appropriate
erial isisgood, actions
aterial good,but
butthe
theprocess
processisis
culate
ad.
bad. Last, all
Last, RPNsthe
assume
assume theprocess
processisis

FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

FMEA - Maquina Neumatica Soriano

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Potential Failure Modes and

PFMEA Key Date:

PFMEA Origination Date:

PFMEA Revision Date:

Core Team Members:

Major disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be scrapped.

Minor disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be reworked.

processes that have often failed 1 in 20 ³ 0.67 7

Moderate: Generally associated

Low: Isolated failures associated

Very Low: Only isolated failures

Almost Impossible Test content detects < 80 % of failures 10

Very Remote Test content must detect 80 % of failures 9

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi