Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MUHAMMAD A. QATTAN
1. INTRODUCTION
The Shari[ah governance process (SGP) is a unique institutional building block
of the Islamic financial architecture. Since clients of Islamic financial institutions
select their business partners on the basis of Shari[ah compliance requirements,
they can enforce discipline in the institutions they participate. There are several
forms of supervisory oversight in Islam: God’s oversight over His creations; self-
control by a person; a person’s supervision of another person; and the
accountability system (hisbah) in general. Within this broad framework of
oversight, the Islamic financial institutions have adopted a rigorous system of self
regulation in the form of Shari[ah supervision.
The organizational structure of the Shari[ah supervision is formalized in
different forms in different institutions, we can assign the SGP the generic name:
the Shari[ah Control Committee (SCC). We consider the work of the SCC similar
to and affiliated with the work of hisbah. The work of the SCC includes all the
supervisory elements and activities that are used to ensure the compatibility of
Islamic banks with Shari[ah. SCC makes sure that the work of an organization is
compatible with Shari[ah rules according to the accredited and agreed legal
opinions (fatwa). SCC ensures the compliance of all activities of an Islamic bank
with the provisions of Islamic Laws.
It is understandable that Shari[ah non-compliance entails a serious reputation
risk and can cause a volcanic eruption of factors that cause quick corporate failure.
Shari[ah non-compliance is hence a systemic risk and can cause financial
instability by triggering bank failure. The SGP plays a unique role in ensuring the
voluntary compliance of the Islamic financial institutions to the Shari[ah. Hence it
ensures the control of reputation risk, which is an important element of operational
risk, and adds to the stability of the financial system. The SGP is architectural in
nature. This nature of the process has not yet been formally discussed in the
literature. In this chapter we discuss the SGP and the SCC in a systematic manner
as a basic building block of the Islamic financial architecture. Our approach in this
study is descriptive and institutional in nature.
274
iii. An independent SCC, detached from the Central Bank, which services
a group of Islamic banks, e.g. the United Shari[ah Committee for the
Dallah al-Baraka Group.
iv. A central advisory committee, either within or outside the bank, which
only gives advice on issues which are formulated. It has nothing to do
with following-up. Fatwa Administration in the Kuwaiti Ministry of
Awqaf is an example of the latter structure.
v. An independent SCC within the bank pertaining to the General
Assembly of shareholders (GA). It plays a comprehensive role as
Shari[ah supervisor and advisor. This is the case in the Sudanese
Faisal Islamic Bank.
vi. A comprehensive Shari[ah system. This system does not relate to the
GA. Its members are chosen by the GA and include some muftis
(Shari[ah advisors), Consultants, Auditors, Controllers, in addition to
the chairman, a General Secretary, a number of missionaries and some
Guides. This structure is most applicable to SCC in KFH, although it
does not specify which members carry out auditing and follow-up.
vii. A separate or fractional part of the administration for SCC. This is a
part of the internal auditing or an independent administration called the
Shari[ah Internal Auditing Administration. For instance, in the Articles
of Association (AA) of the Islamic Solidarity Bank a specialized
administration called the Administration for fatwas and Research
comprised three departments: Shari[ah, Law and the Economy.
viii. A Shari[ah consultant whose opinion is sought regarding certain
activities, but who has no relationship with the implemented actions.
An example of this is the Islamic Banking Scheme in Malaysia and the
Jordan Islamic Bank.
ix. There can be a member of SCC in each administration and department,
as in the Sudanese Solidarity Bank.
x. A Shari[ah scholar for each bank, as in the Egyptian-Saudi Financial
Bank.
xi. A Shari[ah Auditor (SA) for each bank, as with the Islamic Bank in
Denmark which had assigned an internal SA with an External Auditor
(EA).
Table – 1 provides a summary of various institutions that have Shari[ah
committees. About 10-15 scholars are working with over 90% of the Shari[ah
committees of the various institutions.
277
Table – 1
Summary of Shari[ah Control Committees
Nature of Institutions having Specific examples of institutions having
Shari[ah Committees Shari[ah committees
Shari[ah committees of Almost all financial institutions mandated to
individual Islamic financial undertake Shari[ah compatible operations
institutions in national have their own Shari[ah committees
jurisdictions
Shari[ah committees of central Several central banks including, Bank Negara
banks Malaysia, State Bank of Pakistan, and the
Sudanese Central Bank have Shari[ah
committees
Shari[ah committees of supra These institutions include the Islamic
national institutions Development Bank (IDB)1, Islamic
Corporation for the Development of Private
Sector, Accounting and Auditing Organization
for the Islamic Financial Institutions,
International Islamic Financial Market,
Liquidity Management Centre and General
Council of Islamic Banks and Financial
Institutions
Shari[ah committees of special These include Shari[ah committees of the
purpose vehicles (SPVs) various SPVs that issue corporate and
sovereign Sukuk
Shari[ah registration offices For example, the Security and Exchange
Commission of Pakistan has an office named
as Religious Registrar which screens the
applications for registrations of Mudarabah
companies since 1984.
3.2 Size of SCC
The size of most standing Shari[ah committees ranges between 4-6. However,
the number also varies between institutions depending on their types. Although
some central banks have mandatory requirements for Shari[ah supervision in
Islamic financial institutions, yet there are no regulatory requirements on the
membership size of such committees. Neither one can specify the ideal number of
SCC for an Islamic bank until the size, work, activities and the number of branches
of the bank are known. Nevertheless, the minimum number of 1-2 Shari[ah
1
The General Council of the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) has mandated the
IFSB to benefit from the Shari[ah Board of the IDB for the time being.
278
meetings or does not conduct the work assigned to him in a satisfactory manner,
the other members should advise him to ensure he is made aware of his full duties.
If they receive no response from him, they should report to the GA of shareholders
or depositors (if any), based on a mutual agreement among other committee
members, in order to select a replacement. Concerning this matter, in the AA of the
Dubai Islamic Bank, another opinion is to be found. Article 83 says that any issue
related to SCC members shall be forwarded to the Higher Committee for Shari[ah
Control within the IAIBs. The IAIBs does no longer exist. However, the principle
seems to remain valid.
3.9 Legal Authority
The authority of the SCC comes from its position in the framework of the bank,
the entity it belongs to and from which it receives its authority. SCCs hold their
authority on the basis of the following considerations:
i. SCC is one of the different forms of control in Islam, like self-control,
monetary control and God’s control. These controls are understood
from the five objective of the Shari[ah: religion, self, offspring, intellect
and money.
ii. Since the AA of the Islamic bank should stipulate its exclusive
conformity with Shari[ah rules and reject all Shari[ah conflicts, and
consider them invalid, and the text obliging the bank to follow Shari[ah
rules is not susceptible to amendment or cancellation alone, hence, the
permanent Shari[ah role which SCC plays is what gives this committee
its legal status and strength in the Islamic bank.
iii. Some regulatory laws of Islamic banks require them to stipulate, in
their AAs, how to establish an SCC, the way in which it should function
and the nature of its authority, for instance, the decision of the Islamic
World League and the Union Law for the United Arab Emirates. It is
considered one of the components of the Bank’s organization.
iv. From a legal point of view, SCC is considered the regulating and
establishing the constitution of a bank, since most of an Islamic bank’s
transactions fall outside the framework of the General Law. Therefore,
legal entities rely to a great degree on the opinion of those committees.
v. Those committees derive their authority from the GA of shareholders.
vi. Because depositors are affected by the bank’s losses and gains, and they
do not participate in choosing the BD or the EA, this makes them
unable to monitor the work in which they are partners. Thus it becomes
necessary to ensure that the SCC safeguards the depositors' rights, as
they do not have a representative supervisor within the bank. If SCC
undertook this role, it would gain more strength from the depositors as
well as from the shareholders.
281
vii. The opinion that SCC should have a representative on the BD would
give SCC real and legal support within the bank.
viii. The EA is requested to verify the complete compliance of the bank with
regulations and SCC decisions. Consequently the decisions of SCC
have a strong effect on the EA's report, as accredited by the regulatory
authority.
ix. SCC is requested to review all works and transactions. This review
requires a neutral auditor, one who is totally free from being influenced
by the people whose work is reviewed. Consequently, SCC members
should think objectively and independently regarding all issues related
to review and auditing. Their decisions, thinking and opinions should
be independent, which, in turn, would give them legal strength and
authority within the bank.
Based on the above mentioned matters of conscience, it is wrong to make those
committees follow any administrative rules, directives or bodies which take their
authority from any other entity than the GA.
3.10 Obligations
The level of obligation of SCC decisions depends on their status within the
bank’s framework, how their decisions are applied within the bank in general, and
the strength of personality of the members. The more these members are
committed to their opinions and impose them on the administration, the more they
have personal power. But if administrative decisions govern those of the
committee, then administrative decisions govern the SCC. SCC decisions - whether
they are taken unanimously or by a majority, and irrelevant to its position in the
bank's framework - are obligatory. This obligation comes from the fact that these
fatwas made by SCC are a religious judgment and should in the Islamic manner be
followed and this must be stipulated in the AA of the bank.
3.11 Functions and tasks
SCC takes on many duties, most of which are mentioned in the paragraphs
below.
Issuing fatwa
Within the process of issuing fatwa, the following points will be raised:
i. The SCC usually establishes a curriculum to offer fatwa, and to reply to all
queries.
ii. If some issues or unseen prohibited actions related to the question and the
questioner pass unnoticed, the committee should point them out.
iii. The SCC should not give any fatwa regarding a phenomenon until they
have before them the complete details of the issue related to this question,
282
because it could contain some violations which were not included in the
question.
iv. The SCC member should be committed to the committee fatwas within the
bank, but he may give his own opinion outside the bank or another
committee.
v. Questions may be presented by any employee or client of the bank and
should not be limited to the SCC, the director or any party in the bank.
Making an employee free to present questions to the SCC makes him more
able to understand the eventual answer. In addition, it is his question, so he
becomes better able to clarify the question to the committee and he can
also get more satisfactory clarifications.
vi. Questions are accepted by the executive member of the committee or by its
secretary. It is better to have someone constantly available to receive
questions.
vii. After a question has been posed, the committee has to ascertain the
practical reality of the question in order to ensure that their advice will be
practical or to ensure that the question is comprehensive and that no
information is lacking.
viii. Deliberation could mean that the committee will have to meet more than
once. Therefore the committee is not obliged to issue a fatwa regarding a
project or question at the same meeting.
ix. Some committees apply the fatwa during the meeting after the official
approval of the project. The committee reviews the fatwa for the last time,
approves the minutes and then the fatwa comes into effect and is
distributed to all the administrative offices and sectors. Although this
suggests a picture of administrative cooperation and orderliness, no amount
of routine should impede the issuance of fatwa.
x. Though it is rare, it is acceptable to change a fatwa from time to time and
from one place to another. This is due to the fact that:
All the transactions in Islamic banks are still in the process of trial and
error and when the whole picture for such issues becomes clear -
usually by trial - the fatwa will also change.
All fatwas depend on several schools of fiqh, which have so far not
been able to unite and will never do so.
It is accepted among all scholars that several opinions may be
expressed regarding one issue based on correct evidence. Therefore,
there is no objection to multiple opinions, so long as they are based on
evidence which is religiously correct. Anyone who fails to understand
283
deception, lying, fraud or perjury, because these are among the greatest sins. This
is one of the advantages accruing from the fact that SCC members number at least
three. In addition, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) has said: My
nation does not rally on straying. Assuming that an unfortunate, transgression takes
place, it was because of a bad choice of SCC members. If all of them default,
which could reach the extreme position of leading to inflicting damage on others
who trusted their statements, are they liable for disciplinary action or a penalty?
We note that the liability of an auditor before depositors is considered a civil
liability, namely, 1) they may claim compensation for the damage which they
sustain as a result of a wrong evaluation; 2) the depositors would appoint an
independent auditor for them; or 3) the central bank would appoint an auditor for
them.
So, if the SCC has:
i. Signed the annual report after inaccurate perusal failed to express its
comments on the report or on all the work which it examined or if it has
not examined all the bank’s activities;
ii. Approved the annual profits without auditing the statements and
accounts or not reporting any default in distribution;
iii. Concealed or disregarded the unlawful transactions which it has
examined at the bank;
iv. Omitted to define the zakah base and its implementation;
v. Concealed any kind of default in applying Shari[ah transactions or
Islamic behaviour inside the bank which might affect the legality of the
bank’s transactions;
vi. Defaulted in examining the reports and files submitted to it or the
questions addressed to it;
vii. Approved an act involving a Shari[ah violation or doubtful matter
according to Shari[ah;
viii. Accepted an employee who did not fulfil the required standard for
employment in the bank;
ix. Repeated excuses, absences or disagreement on certain matters, it shall
be considered a party defaulting in its duties or violating the trust
assigned to it;
x. Breached the rule of a profession, which is particularly based on trust
and honesty, is a transgression of public interest, which is considered by
scholars as God’s right i.e. the right of society, which is a damage that
must be eliminated. Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
There should be neither damage nor indemnity.
286