Case 1:11-cr-00215-JCC Document 6 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 4

FILED
IN OPEN COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO I TF E

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division CLERK, U.S. DISfRicTfoUPT

ALEXANDRIA, vm^n, '

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 1:11CR215-JCC

Count 1:18 U.S.C. §2252(a)(2) and (b)(1)

Distribution of Child Pornography
MIKE DOUGLAS LATHAM
Count 2:18 U.S.C. §2252(a)(2) and (b)(1)
Defendant. Receipt of Child Pornography

Forfeiture Count: 18 U.S.C. §2253

INDICTMENT

May 2011 Term ~ at Alexandria

Count 1

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

Between on or about May 12,2010, and on or about October 14,2010, in Fairfax

County, Virginia, within the Eastern District of Virginia, the defendant, MIKE DOUGLAS

LATHAM, did unlawfully and knowingly attempt to distribute and distribute, via the Internet,

visual depictions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct, to wit: motion picture files and

still image files depicting prepubescent children engaging in sexually explicit conduct including

fellatio, actual and simulated vaginal and anal intercourse and the lascivious exhibition of the

genitals and pubic area, using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or that has

been mailed and shipped and transported in or affecting interstate and foreign commerce and

which contains materials which have been mailed and so shipped and transported, by any means

including by computer, if (i) the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor
 Case 1:11-cr-00215-JCC Document 6 Filed 05/12/11 Page 2 of 4

engaging in sexually explicitconduct and (ii) suchvisual depiction is of such conduct.

(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(b)(1) and 2256(8)(A).)
 Case 1:11-cr-00215-JCC Document 6 Filed 05/12/11 Page 3 of 4

Count 2

THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

Between on or about May 12, 2010 and on or about October 14, 2010, in Fairfax County,

Virginia, within the Eastern District of Virginia, the defendant, MIKE DOUGLAS LATHAM,

did unlawfully and knowingly receive and attempt to receive, via the Internet, visual depictions

of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct, to wit: motion picture files and still image files

depicting prepubescent children engaging in sexually explicit conduct including fellatio, actual

and simulated vaginal and anal intercourse and the lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic

area, using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or that has been mailed and

shipped and transported in or affecting interstate and foreign commerce and which contains

materials which have been mailed and so shipped and transported, by any means including by

computer, if (i) the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in

sexually explicit conduct and (ii) such visual depiction is of such conduct.

(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2252(a)(2), 2252(b)(1) and 2256(8)(A).)
 Case 1:11-cr-00215-JCC Document 6 Filed 05/12/11 Page 4 of 4

Forfeiture Count

Upon conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), defendant MIKE

DOUGLAS LATHAM shall forfeit to the United States any and all matter which contains visual

depictions described in section 2256(8)(A) produced, transported, shipped and received in

violation of Chapter 110; any property constituting or derived from any proceeds the defendant

obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the said violation; and any and all property used or

intended to be used in any manner or part to commit and to promote the commission of the

aforementioned violation, including but not limited to the following:

(1) One desktop computer; and,

(2) One Seagate hard disk drive, model ST3500630AS, s/n 5QG22E42.

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253.)

A TRUE BILL:

Pumuanl to the F>Govcmm(tnt Act,

the original ofthis page has bscn ft!«J
under seal is Ite Clerk* Office.
FOREPERSON

NEIL H. MACBRIDE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Gerald J. Sm^gfala &

Assistant United States Attorney
Virginia Bar #19923