Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Pro Index
Donation Rates Not Significant 2
Altruistic System Inadequate 2
Altruism Not Sufficient 2
Required Request Laws Not Sufficient 2
Moral Rewards Don’t Solve Supply Problem 2
Supply of living donors for kidneys and liver lobes limitless 3
Donation rates could triple 3
Financial Incentives are not Coercion 3
Attractive Options are not Coercion 3
Ethical Arguments Against Compensation are Disingenuous 4
Living Donors Reduce Wait Time, Save Money 4
Incentives Help Cost Effectiveness 4
Vendor-Donors Generate Savings for Recipients 4
Doubling Amount of Living Donors Plausible Economically 4
Transplantation can remain cost effective 5
Distributive Justice Rationale Flawed 5
Wealth Already Affects Health Care Quality 5
Regulations Could Help Combat Exploitation of Poor 5
Lack of Informed Consent Arguments are Paternalistic 5
Commodification Argument Not Rational 6
Incentives to Family Members Do Affect Donation Rates 6
Objections Do Not Stand Up to Scrutiny 6
Kantian Degradation Argument Does Not Apply 6
Recipients of Organs Use Fewer Resources 6
Payment Does Not Render Act Uncharitable 7
Increased Costs Arguments Do Not Hold 7
Benefits to the Rich Non-Unique 7
Keeping Poor From Organ Sales Immoral 7
Sales are still a Humanitarian Act 7
Incentives Do Not Promote Slavery 8
Incentives Extend Autonomy 8
Current Law Allows For Everyone But Donor To Profit 8
Tax Incentives Don’t Put Pressure on the Poor 8
Futures Market Doesn’t Pressure Poor 9
Incentives Should Be Offered To Increase Supply 9
Incentives Benefit Poor 9
Altruistic Donors Subject to Same Risks 9
Assumptions That Rich Will Always Get Organs Flawed 9
Egalitarian Theories Unwise 10
2
PDF to Word