169 vues

Transféré par jorgetapia

- W2018 MATE202 (Assignment #1)
- Strain hardening
- BRC Strength of Materials
- Material & Processes for NDT part 4
- 127
- Stress and Strain
- IJETAE_0313_01
- Conexion a Momento Usando Viga Tipo I y Columna Tubular en Marco a Momento
- 10307581 User Manual Hdl 30 A
- U.K.Singh_Manufacturing_Processes
- Chap 1
- Nanba & Kamura Study on Behavior of HS CFT Columns
- Final paper_Yousuf_AJSE_241111.pdf
- lecture-31
- Asme Jemt 2008 Panda
- 2 Axial Loading
- IPC2012-90559
- Change in Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties With Beta Phase
- paperRPCMOD2007
- GetTRDoc

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Iftekhar Anam1 and Zebun Nessa Shoma2

Abstract: The importance of various nonliearities involved in the static and dynamic analyses of Reinforced Concrete

structures is investigated in this paper. The nonlinearities studied here are geometric (caused by large deformations

and consequent effect on the elastic properties of the structure) as well as material (due to the nonlinear stress-strain

relationship of concrete and steel). In the first part of the paper, the nonlinear moment-curvature relationship of

arbitrary Reinforced Concrete cross-sections is developed numerically using nonlinear stress-strain relationships for

concrete and steel. The relative importance of geometric and material nonlinearity is studied for a simple 2-storied

frame under static vertical load. Although the effect of material nonlinearity is more important in most of the cases

studied here, the geometric nonlinearity becomes significant at higher loads. The effect of axial load on the moment-

curvature relationship is studied, and the effect of typical axial loads on the flexural behavior of column is found to be

significant. The shear strength of the beams and columns (obtained from empirical equations suggested in the ACI

Code) prove to be very important here. Using the nonlinear sectional properties thus obtained, the nonlinear structural

dynamic analyses of the building are performed subjecting the structure to seismic vibrations using nonlinear

structural dynamics. Recorded ground motion data from two major earthquakes of the past; e.g., the El Centro

earthquake in USA (1940) and the Kobe earthquake in Japan (1995) are used in the dynamic analyses. The results

show the difference between the linear and the nonlinear structural response.

codes do not approach these possible causes of

Reinforced Concrete (commonly known as RCC for structural failure with enough importance. This study

Reinforced Cement Concrete) is a widely used aims to contribute to the existing knowledge of the

construction material in many parts the world. Due to elasto-plastic dynamic behavior of RCC.

the ready availability of its constituent materials, the

strength and economy it provides and the flexibility of Based on a rigorous nonlinear structural model of the

its forms, RCC is often preferred to steel, masonry or material and also considering the geometric

timber in building structures. nonlinearities, parametric studies are performed in this

study to investigate some important details of the

From a structural analysis and design point of view, behavior of RCC. A simple 2-storied, 2-dimensional

RCC is a very complex composite material. It frame is taken for nonlinear static structural analysis

provides a unique coupling of two materials (concrete under increasing vertical load and nonlinear dynamic

and steel) with entirely different mechanical analysis under combined vertical load and seismic

properties. They combine to produce a composite, vibrations. Various aspects of the nonlinear response

which behaves like an elasto-plastic material that of RCC are studied. These include the relative

responds differently to tensile and compressive importance of geometric and material nonlinearity, the

stresses. Also, due to the cracking of concrete, even effect of axial force on the Moment-Curvature (M-φ)

the sectional and therefore the structural properties relationship, importance of flexural strength and shear

depend on the nature and magnitude of the applied strength and the difference between linear and

loads. nonlinear dynamic analysis.

the structure is subjected to dynamic (time-varying) Nonlinearities in RCC

loads like wind, storm, wave and strong ground

motions like earthquake. Despite the importance of the Although the literature on concrete (Neville, 1963)

material nonlinearities or the time-varying properties, and RCC structures (Winter & Nilson 1983, Pillai &

they are rarely considered in the analysis and design of Menon 1998, Park & Paulay 1975) is full of elastic

structures made of RCC. parameters like proportional limit and modulus of

elasticity, the behavior of RCC cannot be modeled

The unsatisfactory behavior of several RCC buildings properly by linear elastic behavior. Recognizing this,

under severe loads like storms and earthquakes call for the design of RCC structures has gradually shifted

more rigorous research work on the elasto-plastic over the years from the ‘elastic’ Working Stress

behavior of RCC under dynamic loads. The Design (WSD) to the more rational Ultimate Strength

considerable amount of experimental work Design (USD). The nonlinearities in RCC members

notwithstanding, there is a growing need for can be geometric as well as material. Both of these

theoretical and computational work to form a more become more important at higher deformations.

1

Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Asia Pacific

2

Former Student, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Asia Pacific

Geometric Nonlinearity remains almost constant despite changes in strain.

Beyond the yield point, the stress increases again with

Linear structural analysis is based on the assumption strain (strain hardening) up to the maximum stress

of small deformations and linear elastic behavior of (ultimate strength, fult) when it decreases until failure

materials. The analysis is performed on the initial at about a stress (fbrk) quite close to the yield strength.

undeformed shape of the structure. As the applied The elastic-perfectly-plastic (EPP) model for steel

loads increase, this assumption is no longer accurate, (Fig. 2), which is used in this work, assumes the stress

because the deformations may cause significant to vary linearly with strain up to yield point and

changes in the structural shape. Geometric remain constant beyond that.

nonlinearity is the change in the elastic load-

deformation characteristics of the structure caused by Since concrete and steel are both strongly nonlinear

the change in the structural shape due to large materials, the material nonlinearity of RCC is a

deformations. While this requires complicated complex combination of both. They are approximately

formulation, reasonable accuracy can be achieved by considered in the USD method for RCC design. In this

suitable approximation of the problem. work, they are used to develop the Moment-Curvature

relationship for an arbitrary RCC section, beginning

For example, in one-dimensional flexural members with a stage where the section is uncracked, up to

modeled by the ‘Euler-Bernouli beam’, the geometric failure (a stage when the bending moment of the

nonlinearity can be reasonably represented by section decreases with increased curvature).

approximating the strains up to second order terms.

This causes a change in the Stiffness Matrix (with

additional nonlinear terms, i.e., function of the Moment-Curvature Relation for Arbitrary RCC

displacements) and the resulting structural analysis Section

needs to be performed by iterative methods, like direct

iteration (Picard method) or the Newton-Raphson The M-φ relationship of arbitrary RCC sections can be

method. These numerical methods are well known and derived numerically by the application of simple

are available in standard texts on structural analysis principles of Strength of Materials. As shown in Fig.

(Crisfield 1991, Reddy 1993). 3, the arbitrary area can be divided into a number of

segments. For a given curvature, the position of the

In RCC structures, among the various types of neutral axis can be determined by trial and error; i.e.,

Geometric nonlinearity, the structural instability or assuming a neutral axis, calculating the strain and

Moment magnification caused by large compressive stress at various points of the section and equating the

forces, stiffening of structures caused by large tensile compressive and tensile forces.

forces, change in structural parameters due to applied

loads (e.g., leading to changed damping or parametric Once the neutral axis is chosen, the moment M can be

resonance) are significant. calculated easily by summing the moments of all the

forces on the section. This method can also be used

Material Nonlinearity when there is an extra axial load on the section, as is

common for most structural members, particularly

Concrete and steel are the two constituents of RCC. building columns.

Among them, concrete is much stronger in

compression than in tension (tensile strength is of the In this work, this procedure is used to derive the

order of one-tenth of compressive strength). While its stress-strain relationship for various RCC cross-

tensile stress-strain relationship is almost linear, the sections

stress-strain relationship in compression is nonlinear

from the beginning. 1. A 16″ deep T-beam section (width 20″ at top and

10″ at bottom and 3″ slab thickness) with two layers of

Several researchers have worked on the nonlinear #6 bars (3 at bottom and 4 at top)

stress-strain relationship of concrete (Hognestad & co- 2. A 10″×10″ column section with two layers of #7

workers 1952, 1955, 1961, Rusch 1960, Kaar 1978). bars (2 at bottom and 2 at top)

Among them, the Hognestad model (Fig. 1) has been

chosen in this work. It approximates the stress-strain In both cases, the ultimate strength of concrete (fc′) is

relationship by a parabola up to the ultimate strength assumed to be 3 ksi, the tensile strength equal to 350

(fc′) and a straight line beyond that up to the crushing psi, the yield strength (fy) of steel 40 ksi and its

of concrete. The maximum crushing strain (εu) and the modulus of elasticity (Es) equal to 29000 ksi.

strain at ultimate strength of concrete (ε0) are about

0.003 and 0.002 respectively. The M-φ relationship for the T-beam (Fig. 4) shows an

almost linearly elastic initial portion. The stiffness is

Steel, on the other hand, is linearly elastic up to a reduced when the concrete cracks due to tension, but a

certain stress (called the proportional limit) after more significant change occurs due to the yielding of

which it reaches yield point (fy) where the stress

Parabola to tension, but the yielding of the reinforcing bars

1.0 Straight Line occurs at curvature ±0.00324 radian/ft, corresponding

to bending moment ±28 k-ft. Once again, the section

fc/fc′ does not fail up to curvatures of ±0.015 radian/ft, as

shown in Fig. 5.

90

60

0 1.0 εu/ε0

Moment (k-ft)

30

ε/ε0

0

Fig. 1: Hognestad Model for Concrete -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015

-30

-60

Typical Stress Strain Diagram

fult -90

fs fbrk Curvature (rad/ft)

fy

Fig. 4:4:Moment

Figure Momentvs.

vs.Curvature

Curvaturefor

forT-Beam

T-Beam

Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Model

E

30

ε 20

Moment (k-ft)

0

Compression -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015

-10

As′ As′ fs ′

-20

φ

NA -30

Curvature (rad/ft)

As fs

As Figure

Fig. 5:5:Moment

Momentvs.

vs.Curvature

Curvaturefor

forColumn

Column

Tension

significant axial forces. In fact for typical RCC

structures, columns are sometimes designed to resist

Fig. 3: Derivation of M-φ Relationship for RC Section axial forces only. Fig. 6 and 7 show families of M-φ

curves for the 10″×10″ square column section

analyzed earlier. Instead of the earlier analysis based

reinforcing bars at curvature of ± 0.00216 radian/ft, on no axial force, the column is now subjected to

corresponding to bending moment +60 k-ft or –75 k- compressive forces (P =) 25, 50, 75, 100, 200 and 300

ft. Here, the negative moment capacity is larger kips. For clarity of the presentation, the results are

because of the greater amount of negative (top) steel. presented in two different figures. Fig. 6 shows the

However due to the ductility of steel, the section does results for the smaller axial forces (25, 50 and 75

not fail until the concrete itself begins to lose strength kips), while Fig. 7 shows the results for the larger

at a strain of 0.002 or crushes at 0.003. A similar forces (100, 200 and 300 kips). The results show that

relationship for the rectangular column section (Fig. 5) the column loses ductility if the axial load is increased,

also shows little ‘kinks’ when the concrete cracks due which is due to the increased compressive strain on

concrete that pushes is closer to failure. At greater i.e., the yielding of steel or the crushing of concrete. If

axial loads, the M-φ diagram tends to go downwards the applied bending moment is ‘small’ compared to

(indicating failure) at smaller curvatures. For example, the axial load, the column fails by the crushing of

this critical curvature is beyond the range of the graph concrete; while the second mode governs for

for P = 25 and 50 kips, but at 75 kips, this curvature is comparatively smaller loads and larger bending

clearly shown to be 0.010 radian/ft. At 100, 200 and moments. In between, there is a balanced load Pb and

300 kips, the critical curvature decreases to 0.0079, corresponding moment Mb when these two ‘failures’

0.0047 and 0.0032 radian/ft respectively. However, occur simultaneously. Thus, if the axial load (P) is

the initial stiffness and moment capacity of the section greater than Pb, the column fails by concrete crushing

increases for P up to 100 kips in the cases studied here while the opposite happens if P is smaller than Pb.

(from 28 to 35, 43, 47 and 52 k-ft), beyond which the Also, the column moment capacity increases if P is

ultimate moment capacity decreases (to 44 and 23 k-ft increased from 0 to Pb while it decreases if P is

respectively). This is explained by the ‘failure’ modes increased beyond Pb. Details of such P-M ‘Interaction

of RCC column. diagrams’ are available in standard RCC texts and are

not repeated here. However, it can be concluded that

the effect of axial loads on the M-φ relationship for

P=25 k P=50 k P=75 k RCC members (particularly columns) is very

important.

60

40

Nonlinear Structural Responses

Moment (k-ft)

20

Based on the nonlinear structural properties derived in

the previous sections, the nonlinear response of a

0

simple 2-dimensional RCC frame is studied. The

-0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 frame is actually 3-dimensional, with the members in

-20

a direction perpendicular to the paper also contributing

-40 substantial loads on the columns. The 2-storied

structure (Fig. 8.) is made of the same beam and

-60 column as were studied earlier and it is subjected to

vertical load on the beams. In this first analysis, the

Curvature (radian/ft) M-φ relationships for the columns are chosen for the

case without axial load. The variation of the vertical

Figure 6: Moment vs. Curvature for deflection at the midspan (B) of the top floor beam for

Fig. 6: Moment vs. Curvature for

P = 25 ~ 75 k different values of the vertical load (w) is shown in

P = 25~75 k

Fig. 9. This figure shows the relative importance of

different nonlinearities on the structural response. The

deflection is much less (and almost linear elastic) if

only the geometric nonlinearities are included in the

P=100 k P=200 k P=300 k

analysis. However, if only the material nonlinearities

60 are considered, the midspan deflection suddenly

increases when the flexural capacity of the T-beam

40 section is exhausted; i.e. at a load of about 5 k/ft.

Although loads as high as 5 k/ft or greater are rare in

Moment (k-ft)

for the purpose of illustration. At even higher loads

0 (about 7 k/ft), the geometric nonlinearity tends to

-0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 stiffen the beam somewhat, so that the deflection at B

-20 does not increase as much as before. However, in the

absence of such stiffening (i.e., if the geometric

-40 nonlinearities are neglected), the midspan deflection

diverges markedly when the flexural capacity of the

-60 beam is reached.

Curvature (radian/ft)

As mentioned, these results are obtained for columns

Figure 7: Moment vs. Curvature for without axial load. If the effect of axial load on the

Fig. 7: Moment vs. Curvature for column properties is included, the results can be

PP == 100~300

100 ~ 300 k

k different. Fig. 10 shows that if the effect of column

axial load is neglected in the M-φ relationship, the

stiffness of the structure can be different, and the

The design strength of column (or other RCC analysis may not be able to predict the structural

members) can be governed by two modes of ‘failure’;

failure due to the exhaustion of column capacity (i.e., flexural strength. For an RCC member, it is a

a sharp increase in deflection in Fig. 10). combination of the shear capacity of the concrete and

lateral reinforcement and can be calculated from

w per unit length empirical equations suggested in the American

Concrete Institute (ACI) Code. Since it depends on the

axial load, neglecting the axial load in determining

A B C member properties can lead to erroneous estimation of

the shear strength. Fig. 11 shows that although the

flexural capacity of the T-beam under study is still not

w per unit length exceeded, it fails in shear when the uniformly

distributed vertical load is only about 3.55 k/ft.

Without Shear

Considering Shear strength

0.06

Fig. 8: 2-Storied Building Under Vertical Load 0.04

0.3 0

Midspan Deflection (ft)

0 1 2 3 4 5

0.2 Uniform Load (k/ft)

Figure

Fig.11:

11:Effect

EffectofofShear

ShearStrength

Strength

0.1

0 Analyses

0 2 4 6 8

Uniform Load, w (k/ft) The nonlinear properties of RCC can be used along

Uniform Load, (k/ft)

with a suitable time-step numerical integration scheme

Figure 9: Midspan Deflection (Clough & Penzien 1975, Chopra 1998) to evaluate the

Fig. 9: Midspan Deflection vs.vs. Load

Load nonlinear dynamic response of RCC structures. For

dynamic response, the elasto-plastic stress-strain

relationship can be extended for loading and

unloading, so that the stress-strain diagram can be

Without Axial Loads With Axial Load approximated by a hysteretic closed loop curve. The

2-storied model frame is used here again to observe

0.3 the difference between the linear and nonlinear

Midspan Deflection (ft)

uniformly distributed vertical load on beams (w = 1.5

0.2 k/ft), now the structure is also subjected to El Centro

(1940) and Kobe (1995) earthquake vibrations.

column is considered here for illustration. Fig. 12 and

13 show the results from linear and nonlinear analyses

0 respectively for El Centro earthquake vibration. The

0 2 4 6 8 ground motion used for study here had maximum

ground acceleration of about 0.3g. Other than minor

Uniform Load (k/ft) differences, the time-series variations of shear forces

Figure 10: Vertical Deflection for are similar in both the linear and nonlinear cases. The

The effect Fig. 10: Vertical

of shear strength Deflection for

on the structural response maximum shear force in the central column is about

different columnProperties

properties

is shown inDifferent

Fig. 11. Column

Shear strength can govern the 13 kips, which is within the shear capacity of the

failure pattern of RCC structures rather than the column. Therefore, the column does not fail in shear.

Also, no visible shift in the mean response is noted 30

(which remains almost zero throughout), indicating no

20

major yielding of the materials.

10

0

15

-10

Column Shear (kips)

10

-20

5

-30

0

0 10 20 30 40

-5

Time (sec)

-10

Fig. 14: Linear

Figure Response

14: Linear to Kobe

Response to

-15

Earthquake

Kobe Earthquake

0 10 20 30 40

Time (sec)

Fig. 12: Linear Response to El Centro

Earthquake 40

Figure 12: Linear Response to

30

El Centro Earthquake

20

15 10

Column Shear (kips)

10 0

5 -10

0 -20

-5 -30

0 10 20 30 40

-10

Time (sec)

-15

0 10 20 30 40 Figure 15: Nonlinear Response to

Fig. 15: Nonlinear Response to Kobe

Kobe Earthquake

Earthquake

Time (sec)

Figure

Fig. 13: 13: Nonlinear

Nonlinear ResponseResponse to

to El Centro Conclusions

El Centro Earthquake

Earthquake

The main conclusions of this study are

1. Both the geometric and material nonlinearities can

The results from Kobe earthquake vibration are shown be important in evaluating the structural responses

in Fig. 14 and 15. Here the maximum ground of RCC structures.

acceleration amplitude is about 0.55g, which causes 2. The Moment-Curvature relationship of RCC

significant nonlinear response of the structure under members strongly depends on the axial load.

study. The linear and nonlinear shear forces in the 3. The shear strength may govern the failure modes

ground floor column also show significant differences. of RCC members in many cases, particularly in

The maximum shear force for the nonlinear system is seismic vibrations.

about 35 kips, which is more than 30% greater than

the linear response. Also, there is a noticeable shift in

the mean shear of the column (from zero to about -8 References

kips) indicating significant yielding of the column. A

very important aspect of the nonlinear response is that Chopra, A. K. (1998). Dynamics of Structures: Theory

the maximum shear force is now greater than the shear and Application to Earthquake Engineering,

force capacity of the column (i.e., 19 kips), which Prentice Hall, India.

means that the column would fail in shear. Clough, R. W. and Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of

Structures, McGraw-Hill Intl., Singapore.

Crisfield, M. A. (1991). Non-Linear Finite Element

Analysis of Solids and Structures, Wiley,

Chichester, UK.

Hognestad, E. (1952). “Fundamental Concepts in

Ultimate Load of Reinforced Concrete Members”,

J. ACI, 48-53.

Hognestad, E., Hansson, N. W., and McHenry, D. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete

(1955). “Concrete Stress Distribution in Ultimate Structures, Wiley, New York.

Strength Design”, J. ACI, 55, p. 455. Reddy, J. N. (1993). Finite Element Method, McGraw-

Kaar, P. H., Hanson, N. W., and Capell, H. T. (1978). Hill Intl., Singapore.

“Stress-Strain Curves and Stress Block Rusch, H. (1960). “Researches towards a General

Coefficients for High Strength Concrete”, ACI Flexural Theory of Structural Concrete”, J. ACI,

Special Publication. 57, 1.

Mattock, A. H., Kriz, L. B., and Hognestad, E. (1961). Winter, G., and Nilson, A. H. (1983). Design of

“Rectangular Concrete Stress Distribution in Concrete Structures, McGraw-Hill International,

Ultimate Strength Design”, J. ACI, 57, 875. Kogakusha, Japan.

Neville, A. M. (1963). Properties of Concrete, Wiley,

New York.

Pillai, S. U., and Menon, D. (1998). Reinforced

Concrete Design, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi,

India.

- W2018 MATE202 (Assignment #1)Transféré parTahir
- Strain hardeningTransféré partndeshmukh
- BRC Strength of MaterialsTransféré parMarco Miso
- Material & Processes for NDT part 4Transféré parAnonymous gFcnQ4go
- 127Transféré parStefan Stanca
- Stress and StrainTransféré parSachin Chaturvedi
- IJETAE_0313_01Transféré pardan20050505
- Conexion a Momento Usando Viga Tipo I y Columna Tubular en Marco a MomentoTransféré parcontrerasc_sebastian988
- 10307581 User Manual Hdl 30 ATransféré parJuan Carlos May
- U.K.Singh_Manufacturing_ProcessesTransféré parGirish Dey
- Chap 1Transféré parLê Ngọc-Hà
- Nanba & Kamura Study on Behavior of HS CFT ColumnsTransféré parNgoc Ba Nguyen
- Final paper_Yousuf_AJSE_241111.pdfTransféré parchinmaya
- lecture-31Transféré partoor05142
- Asme Jemt 2008 PandaTransféré parwalidnasri
- 2 Axial LoadingTransféré parIvan Orlando Limouswan
- IPC2012-90559Transféré parMarcelo Varejão Casarin
- Change in Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties With Beta PhaseTransféré pargalih2010
- paperRPCMOD2007Transféré parJorge_UFCG
- GetTRDocTransféré parsohanlal29
- 0-Chapter-04-part-A.docTransféré parمحمد
- Revere Homework 1 SolutionsTransféré parEstefania Tapias Benitez
- Full TextTransféré parshreedharkolekar
- Case History of the Response of a Longwall Entry Subjected to Concentrated Horizontal StressTransféré parKatta Sridhar
- 1-10.pdfTransféré pareidelsayed
- IRJET-Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Column with Bamboo InfillTransféré parIRJET Journal
- Materia __ Cross Reference TableTransféré parMinh Le
- Gane San 2014Transféré parParveen Jangra
- CHAPTER 1Transféré parmr_sam91
- Thermal Cyclic Fatigue Analysis of Three Aluminum Piston AlloysTransféré parSEP-Publisher

- Apunte4Transféré parJaviera Araseli Aguayo Torres
- Apunte4Transféré parJaviera Araseli Aguayo Torres
- Tablas Perfiles.xlsTransféré parjorgetapia
- DISEÑO DE PLANCHA BASE Y BARRAS DE ANCLAJETransféré parFelipe Morales
- Coefficient of FrictionTransféré parjorgetapia
- Roce deslizante y en giroTransféré parjorgetapia
- Formulario VigasTransféré parjcarvacho
- CAP 8 - FatigaTransféré parjorgetapia
- Clasificación de MaderaTransféré parharshenry
- 37257977-Rocas-ensayosTransféré parbrokita
- Columns Biaxial BendingTransféré parjorgetapia
- Acero 03A Propiedades y ProteccionTransféré parjorgetapia
- ATC-40Transféré parAZ314
- 10.1.1.65.8809Transféré parjorgetapia
- 3-p34-OroscoTransféré parjorgetapia
- tema12Transféré parfmriveros

- Outline 2011Transféré pardesi_paris
- Mole ConceptTransféré parAshpreet Saluja
- Chapter 8 PlastringTransféré parIbrahim Mostazid
- Steel IdentificationTransféré parAhmad Suffian Ismail
- Quantum Hall EffectTransféré partridevmishra
- US EPA 2016Transféré parfatjon
- PRES-1 External Presure Design_07.02.16Transféré parmithuwan
- Structural Design of Metallic ComponentsTransféré parmeial2335
- Dianzuo Wang (Auth.)-Flotation Reagents_ Applied Surface Chemistry on Minerals Flotation and Energy Resources Beneficiation_ Volume 1_ Functional Principle-Springer Singapore (2016)_5Transféré parvahid
- NDT BrochureTransféré parMonica Carroll
- manual safeTransféré parAxel Yohann Montes Mondalgo
- Leaching and Recovery of Platinum Group Metals From UG-2 ConcentratesTransféré parAFLAC ............
- IRJET-Use of Copper Slag in Concrete and Cement Mortar as Replacement of SandTransféré parIRJET Journal
- A536Transféré parCicic Diana
- Unit 7-Partition WallsTransféré parSamhitha
- assessment of NDE for HDPE piping.pdfTransféré parhellmanya
- 2009Transféré parankitgaurav3497
- Weee Recycling Paper Oct14Transféré parRazvan Mican
- ADSORPTION.docxTransféré parpriya_piglet
- U4 - WeldingTransféré parAnonymous LM9RaUA4y
- FPH Flanged Pipe HeaterTransféré parlyorhitma
- DownloadTransféré parCong-OanhNguyen
- ANION HALAMAN 1Transféré parIndra Jemain
- The Von Mises Yield CriterionTransféré parHeinz D'Curva Sud
- CBSE 12th 2015 Chemistry Question Paper SolutionTransféré parkunal bansal
- sciencedirect6c66492f-2a5c-20140518125837Transféré paramirlove206
- Evaluation of Pyrolysis and Steam Gasification Processes of Sugarcane Bagasse in a Fixed Bed ReactorTransféré parGunawanAdiWicaksana
- Principles of Cathodic ProtectionTransféré parRanjitKumar
- 6_CPUNFAO Rheology and Aggregation of Cactus (Opuntia Ficus-Indica) MucilageTransféré parFábio Souza
- Service Manual Toshiba Estia 3rd GEN EnTransféré parALFONSO BARROETA