Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2009
Picking fruit
Credits: 3
© Crown 2009 1
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
Teacher Guidelines:
The following guidelines are supplied to enable teachers to carry out valid and
consistent assessment using this internal assessment resource.
Context/setting:
This assessment is based on the scenario of an apple orchard. Students are given a
map of the orchard with data on each tree. Students must then select a sample and
make inferences to assist the orchard owner in making estimates about apple yields.
Note that stratification is difficult to justify for this task. While the numbers of apples
change as you go from South to North there are no clear divisions where subgroups
that are significantly different (yet are homogeneous within themselves) in terms the
numbers of apples per tree can be identified.
Conditions:
This is an individual classroom activity. It is recommended that up to two hours be
given for this assessment.
The activity can be split over two sessions. Recommended split is to do parts 1 – 3
in the first session and the rest in the second session.
Resource requirements:
Map and data.
Note:
It may be better to initially only hand out the map of the orchard. Once students
have selected their sample they can then get the data.
© Crown 2009 2
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR STUDENT USE
2009
Picking Fruit
The Situation:
There are 280 trees in an apple orchard.
The orchard slopes upwards from rich soil near a river in the south towards a stony
ridge line to the north.
Your Task
The orchardist has asked for information about the number of apples in the orchard.
It would take long too long to find the number of apples on every tree and so
sampling must be used.
1. Write down a purpose statement for your task. Use appropriate statistical
terminology.
3. Use the results of your sample to obtain a value that will help the orchardist.
Perform the necessary calculations and provide the orchardist with the required
information. Explain how you drew this conclusion.
4. Write the name of your sampling method and describe the method in
sufficient detail so that it could be carried out by someone else
without any knowledge of sampling.
© Crown 2009 3
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR STUDENT USE
5. Give reasons for the sampling method you have used. You could
include reasons why you did not use another method. Comments
need to refer to the context of an orchard.
© Crown 2009 4
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR STUDENT USE
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126
127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144
145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162
163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179
180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213
214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229
230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245
246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258
259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
River
ROAD
© Crown 2009 5
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR STUDENT USE
© Crown 2009 6
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
2 Sample of at least 20
trees is taken.
ACHIEVEMENT
A range of acceptable
comments must be
included in the
schedule to ensure
consistency of
assessor judgements.
© Crown 2009 7
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
Assessment
Task Evidence Judgement Sufficiency
Criteria
© Crown 2009 8
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
© Crown 2009 9
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
© Crown 2009 10
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
© Crown 2009 11
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
© Crown 2009 12
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
5
At least one valid
justification that
Justify sampling method makes reference to
SRS – easy and quick, no strata, the characteristics of
the population.
produces an unbiased sample. If
bias is mentioned then a
contextual understanding of it
would be expected, eg giving an
example of a case where a biased
sample would be obtained.
Systematic – no known patterns of
the numbers of apples on trees.
Justify 3 Stratified is not obvious as there
inferences are no clear subgroups that are
At least one valid
made about significantly different. justification or one
the valid comment
population. recognising variability
Justify inference of sampling.
Justification (qn3) is unambiguous
and will refer to sample value – eg
estimate of population mean is ...
because sample mean is .....
OR
A comment that recognises the
variability of sampling – that if
another sample was taken then a
different inference would be
obtained (but if the process was
repeated a number of times it
would be expected that most
sample means would be ‘close’ to
the population mean).
© Crown 2009 13
Internal assessment resource reference number Maths/2/5_E5
PAGE FOR TEACHER USE
Assessment
Task Evidence Judgement Sufficiency
Criteria
Critically 6 The method used is clearly Where some comments Merit plus 6
evaluate the justified (qn5) and two other lack depth other
sampling sampling methods (qn6) are evaluation comments
ACHIEVEMENT WITH EXCELLENCE
A range of acceptable
comments must be included
in the schedule to ensure
consistency of assessor
judgements.
© Crown 2009 14