Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The phrase “law on the books” refers to the “official rules and procedures
specifying what should occur at any given step in the legal process.” The phrase
Technically, only the laws relative to the case and admissible evidence should
play a role in each case that moves through our legal system. Unfortunately,
however, research has shown that outside forces have been known to influence
cases. These forces can be anything from the nonverbal behavior of the judge to
the political mood of the people involved in the case. (Meyer, 2003).
The theory that the law is objective is just that, a theory. In reality, “a
judge (and sometimes a jury) must interpret and apply the law given a particular
set of facts in a case, and this means that human discretion must enter the
picture.” Because the law is open to interpretation, it is impossible for the law to
be applied the same way in every case. In a perfect world, judges and juries
would only apply the law, not interpret it. (Meyer, 2003).
Picture the law as a flower. The first thing you would do is plant a seed.
As the flower grows, it changes. The stem grows, then the leaves grow, then the
petals grow to form the flower. The law is similar to a flower in that it is always
changing. “Different areas of law that are germane to a particular legal issue
Due process of law has been around since the enactment of the Fifth
of due process was that it would protect “citizens only from infringements of their
basic civil rights by agents of the federal government, but not agents of state
which provided a “federal legal mechanism for enforcing state violations of civil
rights.” The purpose of due process of law is to provide “standards for fair
treated equally and fairly when involved with the legal system. A negative aspect
of due process is that it can place limitations on the legal system. The
interpretation of due process has changed since the September 11th attacks in
that, even though the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution have not been amended, even people accused of terrorism are
given the same rights as United States citizens, such as in the case of the
Rights of the accused are part of the due process protection given United
States citizens and date as far back as the enactment of the Bill of Rights.
People accused of committing crimes are provided protection under the United
States Constitution to ensure the legal proceedings are fair. A positive aspect of
the protections given to accused citizens is that these rights prevent the legal
protections given to accused citizens is that even the most violent criminals are
given the same rights as law-abiding citizens. The interpretation of the rights of
the accused has changed since the September 11th attacks in that police and
their clients.
References
Meyer, J.F. & Grant, D.R. (2003). The Courts in Our Criminal Justice System.
Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/classroom/ic/classroom.aspx