Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
(In process)
[Note of 20 May 2011. These materials are still in incomplete working draft
form. They will be further developed, and will be fully on line and ready to go at
09:00 on 1 June 2011.]]
2. Signing in:
Registered students are required to prepare and submit a one page bio note, photo
and short statement of their expectations, hopes for the course. (You will find a rough
example <a href="http://wp.me/P1zD54-1r">here</a>).
1. Any related topic you want – please check with me first before starting work on
it though.
2. Agenda 21
3. Brundtland Commission
4. Carbon tax
5. Carsharing
6. Climate modification
7. Club of Rome
8. Corporate social responsibility
9. Dematerialization
10.Factor of four
11.Global footprint
12.Global warming
13.Jane Jacobs
14.Limits to Growth
Orientation of presentation:
We will want to hear from you not only to tell us about what this particular
report/event/strategy might mean, but also to share your first remarks with us on what
message you get from it when it come to the sustainability/business interface. Both
problems, constraints and opportunities. (Of course you will not be able to dig very far
into that, but you will have more time for the longer presentation that will take place
on Tuesday. This will however give you some first feedback from the discussions which
hopefully will help you as you take your idea the next stage.
Short written report of no more than two pages consisting of (a) short methodological
note, (b) citation of at least three sources consulted for presentation; and (3) your
presentation notes (perhaps in the form of bullet points)
Note: You may chose to make this first short report as a trial run for the full 50
presentation on 10 June. And possibly beyond that your main course paper. The idea
for those who chose to take this course is that you can get iterations of feedback from
the class. (And possibly from the auditors, though that has yet to be nailed down.)
Afternoon Session:
Each presentation will require submittal of a 2 page written summary of the main
points and possibly the contradictions of the document and program in question. The
summary will be posted on the website and the class will silently review. This will be
followed by a half hour presentation setting out the stuendt's arguments and
conclusion in more detail, and will be followed by questions and open discussion by
the class.