Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY Http://www.ceu.hu/crc/
The CRC Course Development Competition aims to encourage the development and
introduction of innovative university courses in the curricula of the universities of the
region.
Within the CDC program, the Pilot Course Portfolio project aims to develop the tools
for critical-self reflection and scholarly debate on the opportunities and barriers for
introducing innovative practices in university teaching, by investigating the
complexities of course design and course implementation process.
1. To introduce the scholarship of teaching approach using the course portfolio method
in order to promote the production and delivery of high-quality, student centred
university teaching understood as a scholarly activity an a par with academic
research.
2. To investigate barriers and create opportunities for innovation in university teaching
on the level of course design implementation, teaching and assessment techniques
and evaluation methods.
3. To support innovative teachers and promote their work as examples of best practice
in university teaching on the level of a single course.
4. To contribute to the development of scholarly debate on university teaching among
academic in the region by sharing knowledge on the production of innovative
approaches to designing and teaching university courses.
1
It was pioneered by a project of the American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) involving
faculty of American universities, in the context of public debate on the quality of teaching and the need
for more transparency and quality control of teaching as well as in the context of recognising and
rewarding teaching excellence among university professors.
Curriculum Resource Center: Pilot Course Portfolio Project: Overview 1
education, concerned with stressing and documenting the relationship between the
course concept/content and the teaching practice adopted by the teacher in order to
convey that concept. The teacher is able to compare his or her intentions with the actual
learning outcomes and to evaluate the appropriateness of course design and course
implementation choices he/she had made. Thus, the course portfolio makes critical self-
reflection of teaching possible. However, course portfolio is at the same time a method
of focusing the teacher’s attention on student learning and putting student-centred
education into practice (as it is documented and analysed during and after the
implementation of the course). 2
The underlying principle of the course portfolio is the scholarship of teaching concept,
postulated as an integral part of a faculty member’s work (alongside the scholarships of
discovery, integration and application). As explained by Lee Shulman ‘every course is
inherently an investigation, an experiment, a journey motivated by purpose and beset by
uncertainty. A course, therefore, in its design, enactment, and analysis, is as much an act
of inquiry and invention as any other activity more traditionally called “research” or the
scholarship of discovery.’3 This approach is consistent with a philosophy of student-
centred paradigm in teaching and with the demands for quality control and transparency
in the university teaching.
Thus, the main functions of a course portfolio project can be summarised as:
• An essay on the course concept and the questions that the professor aims to answer
by producing a course portfolio (which may be related to the relationship between
the course content and the course context: the particular institution, the background
and skills of the students, position within the curriculum, intended learning
outcomes).
• An extended complex syllabus with information related to the course content,
readings and planned methods of delivery and student assessment.
2
This summary is based on Pat Hutchings, (ed) The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine their
Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning, (Washington, DC: AAHE, 1998)
3
Lee S. Shulman, ‘Course Anatomy: The Dissection and Analysis of Knowledge Through Teaching’ in
Pat Hutchings, (ed) The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine their Teaching to Advance Practice
and Improve Student Learning, (Washington, DC: AAHE, 1998), 5.
4
Pat Hutchings ‘Defining Features and Significant Functions of the Course Portfolio’ in Pat Hutchings,
(ed) The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine their Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve
Student Learning, (Washington, DC: AAHE, 1998), 13-18.
In short, a course portfolio is an outcome of a research project into ones own teaching,
focusing on a single course, which is evidence-based, available for peer review and able
to stimulate debate among teaching academics.
3. The need for the project and the use of the concept
The particularities of our target region require a re-examination and re-working of the
traditional tools in teaching and learning. For some time, we have attempted to find a
‘middle ground’ which reflects best practice and local problems. But this has often
resulted in an uneasy compromise that does not give sufficient space to individual
reflection but simply promotes ‘best practice’ as an ‘opt in-opt out’ bag of tricks. This
intersection of needs with the teaching ‘canons’ should instead put the various
paradigms into a critical tension, allowing us to re-identify and re-work.
To change this situation, we have decided to adopt and revise the Course Portfolio
approach. The main purpose of the project is to develop the tools for critical-
self reflection and scholarly debate on the opportunities and barriers for
introducing innovative practices in university teaching. The pilot (which will
no doubt be one of several as we move our parameters) will experiment with a
variety of Portfolio approaches – from the guided to the free, and we will also
construct or ‘angle’ several guided Portfolios to promote understanding of the
relationship between the ‘transmission’ and the production of knowledge.
The concept of the Course portfolio will be adapted to match the specific needs of our
region. It will allow for the deepening of the participant’s application of the
received training in their classrooms. For instance, we will put more emphasis
on course design process, the institutional challenges in introducing new
courses and teaching practices, particularly at the level of teaching methods
and assessment techniques. Apart form providing space for discussion on the
course portfolio projects, the workshops will allow the participants to
gain/refresh their insight into all areas relevant to contemporary university
teaching (planning of courses, complex lesson planning and complex teaching
skills, peer and student evaluation and various methods of student assessment).
The participating university teachers will be supported by the CRC office throughout
their grant period by means of special training sessions, webforum and email and will
receive an additional 5 month-long grant extension
• Experiment with the course structure, by means of considering two different ways to
explore the topic of the course or of a section of the course during course design
• Introduce at least one new form of assessment
• Introduce one form of ongoing (formative) assessment
• Include at least one transferable skill into the course design
• Experiment with at least two new teaching methods during the course
implementation
• Experiment with at least two forms of student evaluation
• Involve one colleague from the department to provide a commentary on the course,
to be included in the portfolio
1. Free topic
2. Provide a reflective essay on your course and its innovations in relation to federal or
national educational standards (on curriculum and assessment standards)
3. Reflect on your own learning of the course content that was the result of the
teaching experience
4. Reflect on any possible changes of your own ideas about teaching and learning as a
result of the project experience
Curriculum Resource Center: Pilot Course Portfolio Project: Overview 4
5. Reflect on the relationship between your research and your teaching in this
particular course (if applicable).
6. Reflect on all the barriers you encountered in introducing the required innovations
during the course design and course implementation stage and on the ways you tried
to overcome them
1. Presentation of the work in progress, particularly the course concept and course
syllabus
2. Peer review and mutual evaluation of progress made
3. Discussion of plans and expectations for the teaching implementation stage
Project outcomes
The Pilot CDC Course Portfolio project will result in the production of the following:
• Print and web-based course portfolios and collection of evaluations and critical
remarks on the projects
• CRC working paper publication, possible as an edited volume of course portfolios
and commentaries
• The created courses (developed, taught and improved over a two-year period)
documented in the extended syllabi.
• Presentations of the course portfolio project outcomes at the participants’
universities and at appropriate conferences
• A course portfolio project methodology to be developed by the CRC office