Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Gianni Sutaniman
Abstract
Intertidal zones are environments where marine and terrestrial ecosystems meet. There are a
variety of marine organisms that are present in this habitat. The distribution and abundance of
these organisms are dictated by the different gradients present in intertidal zones. The focal
organism that was studied was Littorina littorea, the periwinkle. Using data collection and
statistical tests, it can be observed that the population of periwinkles are affected by Both
environmental factors such as tidal activities and biological interactions with other organisms.
Introduction
Intertidal zones are areas in between marine and terrestrial ecosystems. This type of
environment is dictated by the daily cycles of tides. Lower intertidal zone is exposed only
during low tides and marine organisms dominate this community. Organisms living here are
defined by environmental factors such as desiccation and high temperature. For example,
Populations of periwinkle that live in the lower zonation are more affected by predator
density and amount of green algae (Carlson et al. 2006). The focal species of this experiment
is the periwinkle (Littorina littorea). These organisms are grazers that belong to the phylum
mollusca and class gastropoda. They have vestigial internal shell and foot.
limpet populations. The small space in intertidal habitats promotes competition between
species and causes limited adaptations or may favor a single intermediate phenotype (Hays
2007). We also hypothesized that there is a relationship between periwinkle populations and
environmental gradients also affects the community structure and diversity in intertidal
Methods
We conducted the observations and data collection in Spring 2011 in lower intertidal
Crescent Bay in Laguna Beach. Firstly, a 50 m rope that acts as a baseline was placed along
the north side of the study site, beginning at the upper intertidal zone and continues down to
the lower zone. At the baseline distance, we laid out a 25 foot transect perpendicular to the
baseline and used this area for our data collection. We used a random numbers table to obtain
a random distance from the baseline. In each plot we estimated the percentage of the plot that
is covered by water and recorded the data. For the organisms in the first 10 rows of the data
sheet, we observed and estimated the percent cover within the plot and recorded the data. We
used the small discs that are provided to estimate percent cover for these organisms. For the
remaining organisms, we counted the number of organisms of each taxon in the plot and
For the data analysis procedure, we used Microsoft excel and StatCat. First we did a
normality test for our focal organism, which was the periwinkle. The normality test showed
that our focal organism’s distribution was not normal. Therefore, it can be assumed that our
other two organisms are also not normal. For the periwinkle and limpets, we did a
contingency table. Because our contingency is a 2x2 table and had a degree of freedom of 1,
we used the Yates correction. From this, we acquired Chi-squared c (χ²c) and the p-value.
The same test was used for periwinkles and anemones. The spearman rank correlation was
used for periwinkles and limpets. We repeated the procedure for the correlation between
periwinkles and water cover. The last statistical test we used was a regression correlation
between periwinkles and intertidal gradient. We used StatCat to obtain the F value and p-
value.
Results
crescent bay.
Results showed that the alternative hypothesis was accepted using a contingency table
between periwinkle and limpet populations (χ²c = 9.340, p=0.0022), but rejected for
periwinkle and anemone (χ²c =1.692, p= 0.1933). The results also showed that there is a
(F=11.9134, p=0.0027).
Discussion
It can be observed that the tidal activity in the upper intertidal environment directly
affects the distribution and abundance of organisms such as periwinkles, limpets, and
anemone. Based on our results, there is a very strong correlation between intertidal gradient
and the distribution of marine organisms. Our results supported our hypothesis that there was
an association between the densities of periwinkles and limpets. However, our result showed
a negative association between periwinkles and anemones. Our hypothesis was supported that
there was a difference between periwinkles and limpets populations. There was also a
difference between periwinkles and water coverage. Populations of periwinkles are dictated
by the emersion time in water (Hays, 2007). Our last hypothesis was also supported that there
This study is important to see the effects of organisms living in intertidal habitats.
The study can be useful in correlating the effect of climate changes to marine ecosystems. An
increased in global warming causes an increase in sea water levels and temperature in
intertidal habitats. For example, organisms that usually live in drier environment are now
experiencing more water coverage. Another factor is the explosion of a certain population of
populations by increasing their reproductive rate and extending the reproduction period
(Moore et al. 2011). In conclusion, it is important to monitor the distribution and abundance
Carlson, R., M. Shulman, & J. Ellis. 2006. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 72: 211.
Gingold, R., M. Mundo, & O. Holovachov. 2010. The role of habitat heterogeneity in
structuring the community of intertidal free-living marine nematodes. Marine Biology 157:
1741.
Hays, C. 2007. Adaptive phenotypic differentiation across the intertidal gradient in the alga
con0specific gastropoda in response to climate warning. Global Change Biology 17: 709.