} Course pane a Nikhil Santosh Roll no 16: y Seat no +§ r Div Engin caring t Specimen preparation for microscope ——— examination ____— Rimi To Pind oot ee ) yowious phases present ia _motteriet Hardness —_ond__strength- OP _moderie) $$ aN Composition of_modericd + ___ has 4) Reasan of Failure of _moteriel ____— Qaneiple_: Microscope werk on_principle_ofjneagemy MIT | Engineering un uacomons neta hie 1 bis I 4H 1 Med ks . | o allographic is_4he studs. _of physicod otru chee. ond Trees oF meted by using. micros copy - Lerostructure arrongemerds of grains isis is__geo metric and _ different : Bi phases present jn moteriol . tt Metal ; [ Sllogra phic Specimen preparedlian procedures ; a Be ot *) Mounting. iii) Grinding iv) Polishing. mH ) ee > vx). Microscopic examination are ste ps “7 include _tor_proper preparation of metollagraphic ~—Sfedimens. ta_delermine microstructure, =| ——Ihe First Stage of a microsco ple examinecian Tees of on appra priate _spedmen | ample. + — When _specimen_is_ selected! it must be cut fram the Sample __ ce a -=—When specimen_is_cut from gample it must be _ __prepared for _examinatian, ond i+ invalves nting and poli'shin i imen 15 mounted thau9h —_ must be polished . adh we have td etched specimen _ imen will be _excumined 3 microscope. =academy 2 MIT | tnsineorg = rine es = a8 Stodg : ee ee «Specimen was selected from on alo nim) = cD ug wacked dion choit cer ya hace aled ) Sect on'in Specimen Section was Aronsvers € = it was “cut Prom lovlk_ sample using cutting wheel. : ti Mountin’ The specimen _was mounted using i Lbokelvte “thermoplastic _ “The specimen _was——— mt Olacel hn in 1 0 PR-25 moonting. pre S$ __ Fhe_s. pecisnen_was_set_on_jhe_pom_ond Tom, was lowered | Ake —_wokelite disc was set onthe $ecimen_.—The ___|_ top _enclusre _wias “seoled ond Me heoter_ wes ured | an. Te _rom_coskrel_arm_was— wed to mantoyn Ped o_const Pressure for dhe. duration tne bu’ ‘ _tmer ‘when —the- }mer_ Sounded _qftere_cppras’im. 4 One _ cooling process 4 .e-mavited specimen ee arias. _}ne_specimen_had. “cooled it bench gfind er Tre tough edges “motoriol —wered removed fF pee| , ee | IVI esas \ aye ‘ ie ie gtinder was. filed with series of sition cotbide-— aoe was. 5 round on the 240, 920 , 400 cod Since uae size“ papers for opproximad Fixe 73 een four_poper were lybricoded with — 4 Washed yen ep ee specimen wos Hrralghty | r gon ate b_to prevent i larger SiC _gran__cartled on to the next grmding-- it av} falishing : the specimen was polished first on wheed ulth_(un_dromand paste then with a.$ sun _dlamend past. “The spedmen was palished_for appron motel. 1S_minutes_. a Etching the sped men was. then taken +6 ae the fme__neod _for_etchivg_. ~The specimen__ was _jmmersed in_a_o-S*/— nydro_-Alvaric 3 for fens second ._fhen_ specimen was “removed fam a immedi. ely_pinsedl_witth wale Fe “the specimen was exortined —_—_— = atin wes. in Increased to __ “specimen has_meny- ‘ores were ckoMe —Figure 4: Photomicrograph of as-polished specimen at 50x magnificationFigure 7: Etched photomicrograph at 500x magnificationFigure 6: Etched photomicrograph at 50x magnificationpcade amy ¢ Engine’ ng ry nee | fNandages : Kwith the inion of specimen exeminedion We con ane mecteriex conclude, reason of failure te ony. specimen » ‘ *) Proper preparatiod a af metollographic. Specimens {s kev. Step to defermine ne acturare microstrauture of a maderic! 3) the metollagrephic Cxerninadion of specimen “ cllow the metollayapher to abserve » record te crpstolline _stYeuture. sae es: i yt mproper renee Method mop obs¢ure features , ond " even create artifacts that may. be mis interpreated . ; pot Aipplicotion : LV Tt help to Find out ouch as: well so 4 04 strength _of att moter} E42 Alea with ie help“ of exomination _! we oo at Ciaaal behing d moterio| — eee