Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3) Fluctuating Returns :-Mutual funds are like many other investments without a
guaranteed return. There is always the possibility that the value of your mutua
l fund will depreciate. Unlike fixed-income products, such as Bonds and Treasury
Bills, mutual funds experience price fluctuations along with stocks that make u
p the fund.
4) Costs Despite Negative Returns :- Investors must pay sales charges, annual f
ees, service charges and other expenses regardless of how the fund performs. In
addition, depending on the timing of their investment, investors may also have t
o pay taxes on any capital gains distribution they receive – even if the fund went
on to perform poorly after they bought shares.
5) Misleading Advertisements :-The misleading advertisements of different funds
can guide investors down the wrong path. Some funds may be incorrectly labeled
as growth funds, while others are classified as small-cap or income.
6) Evaluating Funds :-Not offer investors the opportunity to compare the P/E rat
io, sales growth, earnings share, etc. A Mutual Fund’s Net Asset Value gives the i
nvestors the total value of the Another limitation of mutual fund is the difficu
lty they pose for investors interested in researching and evaluating the differe
nt funds. Unlike stocks, mutual funds do fund’s portfolio less liabilities.
High
Equity Capital Market, Equity Funds (Diversified as well as Sector) Diversif
ication, Expertise in stock picking, Liquidity, Tax free dividends
Month
Amount Invested
Purchase Price
No of Units Purchased
1
1000
10
100
2
1000
09
111.11
3
1000
10
100
4
1000
11
90.9
Total Investment = Rs. 4000; No of units purchased is 402.21. The averag
e cost per units work out to be Rs9.95.
As illustrated, over time you have a lower average cost
per unit. By investing a fixed amount of money at regular intervals, you as an i
nvestor stand to gain reasonable returns and create significantly wealth-over ti
me.
Lower Cost of Investing:
Getting into SIP program does not required large investment amounts at r
egular intervals. Even as small as Rs. 1000 can be invested at regular intervals
.
\
AMFI is an APEX body of all Asset Management Companies (AMC), which has
been registered with SEBI. Till date all the AMC’s are that have launched mutual f
und schemes are its members. It functions under the supervision and guidelines o
f its Board of Directors.
Association of Mutual Funds of India has brought down the Indian Mutual
Fund Industry to a professional and healthy market with ethical lines enhancing
and maintaining standards. It follows the principle of both protecting and promo
ting the interests of mutual funds as well as their unit holders.
Objectives
The AMFI works with 30 registered AMC’s of the country. It has certain def
ined objectives, which juxtaposes the guidelines of its Board of Directors. The
objectives are as follows:
This mutual fund association of India maintains high professional and ethical st
andards in all areas of operation of the industry.
It also recommends and promotes the top class business practices and code of con
duct which is followed by members and related people engaged in the activities o
f MF and asset management. The agencies who are by any means connected or involv
ed in the field of capital markets and financial services also involved in this
code of conduct of the association.
AMFI interacts with SEBI and works according to SEBI’s guidelines in the mutual fu
nd industry.
AMFI do represent the Government of India, the Reserve Bank of India and other r
elated bodies on matters relating to the Mutual Fund Industry.
It develops a term of well-qualified and trained Agent distributors. It implemen
ts a programmed of training and certification for all intermediaries and other e
ngaged in the mutual fund industry.
AMFI undertakes all India awareness programmed for investors in order to promote
proper understanding of the concept and working of mutual funds.
At last but not the least association of mutual fund of India also disseminate i
nformation on Mutual funds Industry and undertakes studies and research either d
irectly or in association with other bodies.
INDUSTRY PROFILE
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The securities market achieves one of the most important functions of channeling
idle resources to productive resources or from less productive resources to mor
e productive resources. Hence in the broader context the people who save and inv
estors who invest focus more towards the economy’s abilities to invest and save re
spectively. This enhances savings and investments in the economy, the two pillar
s for economic growth. The Indian Capital Market has come a long way in this pro
cess and with a strong regulator it has been able to usher an era of a modern ca
pital market regime. The past decade in many ways has been remarkable for securi
ties market in India. It has grown exponentially as measured in terms of amount
raised from the market, the number of listed stocks, market capitalization, trad
ing volumes and turnover on stock exchanges, and investor population. The market
has witnessed fundamental institutional changes resulting in drastic reduction
in transaction costs and significant improvements in efficiency, transparency an
d safety.
Stock Exchange:
A stock exchange, share market or bourse is a corporation or mutual organization
which provides facilities for stock brokers and traders, to trade company stock
s and other securities. Stock exchanges also provide facilities for the issue an
d redemption of securities, as well as, other financial instruments and capital
events including the payment of income and dividends. The securities traded on a
stock exchange include: shares issued by companies, unit trusts and other poole
d investment products and bonds. To be able to trade a security on a certain sto
ck exchange, it has to be listed there. Usually there is a central location at l
east for recordkeeping, but trade is less and less linked to such a physical pla
ce, as modern markets are electronic networks, which gives them advantages Of sp
eed and cost of transactions. Trade on an exchange is by members only. The initi
al offering of stocks and bonds to investors is by definition done in the primar
y market and subsequent trading is done in the secondary market. A stock exchang
e is often the most important component of a stock market. Supply and demand in
stock a market is driven by various factors which, as in all free markets, affec
t the price of stocks (see stock valuation).
There is usually no compulsion to issue stock via the stock exchange itself, nor
must stock be subsequently traded on the exchange. Such trading is said to be o
ff exchange or over-the-counter. This is the usual way that bonds are traded. In
creasingly, stock exchanges are part of a global market for securities.
History of stock exchanges:
In 12th century France the courratiers de change were concerned with managing an
d regulating the debts of agricultural communities on behalf of the banks. As th
ese men also traded in debts, they could be called the first brokers.
Some stories suggest that the origins of the term "bourse" come from the Latin b
ursa meaning a bag because, in 13th century Bruges, the sign of a purse (or perh
aps three purses), hung on the front of the house where merchants met.
However, it is more likely that in the late 13th century commodity traders in Br
uges gathered inside the house of a man called Van deer Burse, and in 1309 they
institutionalized this until now informal meeting and became the "Bruges Bourse"
. The idea spread quickly around Flanders and neighboring counties and "Bourses"
soon opened in Ghent and Amsterdam.
In the middle of the 13th century, Venetian bankers began to trade in government
securities. In 1351, the Venetian Government outlawed spreading rumors intended
to lower the price of government funds. There were people in Pisa, Verona, Geno
a and Florence who also began trading in government securities during the 14th c
entury. This was only possible because these were independent city states ruled
by a council of Influential citizens, not by a duke.
The Dutch later started joint stock companies, which let shareholders invest in
business ventures and get a share of their profits - or losses. In 1602, the Dut
ch East India Company issued the first shares on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. I
t was the first company to issue stocks and bonds. In 1688, the trading of stock
s began on a stock exchange in London. Stock Exchang.
The role of stock exchanges:
Stock exchanges have multiple roles in the economy, this may include the followi
ng:
1. Raising capital for businesses:- The Stock Exchange provides companies with t
he facility to raise capital for expansion through selling shares to the investi
ng public.
2. Mobilizing savings for investment:-When people draw their savings and invest
in shares, it leads to a more rational allocation of resources because funds, wh
ich could have been consumed, or kept in idle deposits with banks, are mobilized
and redirected to promote business activity with benefits for several economic
sectors such as agriculture, commerce and industry, resulting in a stronger econ
omic growth and higher productivity levels.
Share
A unit of ownership interest in a corporation or financial asset. While owning s
hares in a business does not mean that the shareholder has direct control over t
he business s day-to-day operations, being a shareholder does entitle the posses
sor to an equal distribution in any profits, if any are declared in the form of
dividends. The two main types of shares are common shares and preferred shares.
In the past, shareholders received a physical paper stock certificate that indic
ated that they owned "x" shares in a company. Today, brokerages have electronic
records that show ownership details. Owning a paperless share makes conducting t
rades a simpler and more streamlined process, which is a far cry from the days w
ere stock certificates needed to be taken to a. Brokerage before a trade could b
e conducted. While shares are often used to refer to the stock of a corporation,
shares can also represent ownership of other classes of financial assets, such
as mutual funds.
BSE INDICES
INDEX: An Index is used to summarize the price movements of a unique set of goo
ds in the financial, commodity, forex or any other market place. Financial indic
es are created to measure price movements of stocks, bonds, T-bills and other ty
pe of financial securities. More specifically, a stock index is created to provi
de investors with the information regarding the average share price in the stock
market. Broad indices are expected to capture the overall behavior of equity ma
rket and need to represent the return obtained by typical portfolios in the coun
try
SENSEX:SENSEX is India s first Index compiled in 1986. It is a basket of 30 cons
tituent stocks representing a sample of large, liquid and representative compani
es.
The base year of BSE-SENSEX is 1978-79 and the base value is 100. The index is w
idely reported in both domestic and international markets through print as well
as electronic media. Due to its wide acceptance amongst the investors, SENSEX is
regarded to be the pulse of the Indian stock market. All leading business newsp
apers and the business channels report SENSEX, as it is the language that all in
vestors understand.
SENSEX is calculated using a market capitalization weighted method. As per this
methodology, the level of the index reflects the total market value of all 30- c
omponent stocks from different industries related to particular base period. The
total market value of a company is determined by multiplying the price of the s
tock by the number of shares outstanding Statisticians call the index of a set o
f combined variables (such as price and No. of shares) a composite index. An ind
exed number is used to represent the results of this calculation in order to mak
e the value easier to work with and track over a time. It is much easier to grap
h a chart based on indexed values than one used on actual values.
In practice, the daily calculation of SENSEX is done by dividing the aggregate m
arket value of the 30 Companies in the index by a number called the Index Diviso
r. The Divisor is the only link to the original based period value of the SENSEX
. The Divisor keeps the Index comparable over a period of time and the reference
point for the entire index maintenance adjustments. SENSEX is widely used to de
scribe the mood in the Indian Stock Markets
COMPANY PROFILE
INTRODUCTION:
Inter-connected Stock Exchange of India Limited (ISE) is a national-level sto
ck exchange, providing trading, clearing, settlement, risk management and survei
llance support to its Trading Members. It has 841 Trading Members, who are locat
ed in 131 cities spread across 25 states. These intermediaries are administrativ
ely supported through the regional offices at Delhi, Kolkata, Patna, Ahmadabad,
Coimbatore and Nagpur, besides Mumbai.
ISE aims to address the needs of small companies and retail investors b
y harnessing the potential of regional markets, so as to transform them into a l
iquid and vibrant market using state-of-the art technology and networking.
ISE has floated ISE Securities & Services Limited (ISS) as a wholly-owne
d subsidiary under the policy formulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI) for “Revival of Small Stock Exchanges”. The policy enunciated by SEBI
permits a stock exchange to float a subsidiary, which can take up membership of
larger stock exchanges, such as the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NS
E), and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE). ISS has been registered by SEBI as
a Trading-cum-Clearing Member in the Capital Market segment and Futures & Option
s segment of NSE and Capital Market segment of BSE. Trading Members of ISE can a
ccess NSE and BSE by registering themselves as Sub-brokers of ISS. Thus, the tra
ding intermediaries of ISS can access other markets in addition to the ISE marke
t. ISS thus provides the investors in smaller cities, a one-stop solution for co
st-effective and efficient trading and settlement services in securities.
Complementing the stock trading function, ISE’s depository participant (DP
) services reach out to intermediaries and investors at industry-leading prices.
The full suite of DP services is offered using online software, accessible thro
ugh multiple connectivity modes - leased lines, VSATs and internet. Operation of
the demat account by a client requires just a few mouse clicks.
The Research Cell has been established with the objective of carrying o
ut quality research on various facets of the Indian financial system in general
and the capital market in particular.
It brings out a monthly newsletter titled “NISE” and a fortnightly public
ation titled “V share”. The Research Cell plans to expand its activities by publishi
ng a host of value based research publications, covering a number of areas, such
as equities, derivatives, bonds, mutual funds, risk management, pension funds,
money markets and commodities. The ISE Training Centre conducts class-room train
ing programmers on different subjects related to the capital market, such as equ
ities trading and settlement, derivatives trading, day trading, arbitrage operat
ions, technical analysis, financial planning, compliance requirement, etc. Throu
gh these courses, the training centre provides knowledge to stock brokers, sub-b
rokers, professionals and investors to also appear for the certificate courses c
onducted by the stock exchanges.
It also aims to make and build the professional careers of MBAs, post gr
aduates and graduates, with a view to enabling them to work effectively in secur
ities trading, risk management, financial management, corporate finance discipli
nes or function as intermediaries.
MILESTONES
July 6, 1996 A report on Inter-connected Market System (ICMS) submitted to th
e Federation of Indian Stock Exchange (FISE).
October 26, 1996 Steering Committee was constituted by FISE at Hyderabad.
January 4, 1997 Pricewater House Coopers,the management consultancy firm, submit
ted a feasibility report and recommended the establishment of ICMS.
January 22, 1998 ISE incorporated as a company limited by guarantee.
November 18, 1998 SEBI grants recognition to ISE.
February 26, 1999 Commencement of trading on ISE.
December 31, 1999 Induction of 450 Dealers commences.
January 18, 2000 Incorporation of ISS as a company limited by share capit
al.
February 24, 2000 SEBI registers ISS for the Capital Market segment of NSE
.
May 3, 2000 Commencement of trading by ISS in the Capital Market segment of
NSE.
January 10 , 2001 Turnover in the Capital Market segment of NSE crosses Rs
. 1000 million per day.
February 28, 2001 Turnover of Rs. 1508.80 million recorded by ISS in the C
apital Market segment of NSE.
May 4, 2001 Internet trading for clients started by ISS for the NSE segment
through DotEx Plaza.
May 19, 2001 ISE’s website, www.iseindia.com, launched.
February 13, 2002 SEBI registers ISS for the Futures & Options segment of
NSE.
May 6, 2002 ISS commences trading in the Futures & Options segment of NSE.
March 12, 2003 ISS admitted as a member of the Equities segment of BSE.
April 1, 2003 DP services through CDSL launched by ISE.
June 21, 2003 First Investor Education Program under the Securities Market Awa
reness Campaign (SMAC) of SEBI conducted at Vashi.
January 9, 2004 Peak turnover of Rs. 3034.90 million recorded by ISS in the Capi
tal Market segment of NSE.
May 17, 2004 First DP branch office opened at Coimbatore by ISE.
July 17, 2004 First Investor Point opened at the Vashi Railway Station Complex
by ISE.
July 24, 2004 Second DP branch opened at New Delhi by ISE.
September 3, 2004 Third DP branch opened at Kolkata by ISE.
December 27, 2004 Trading in the BSE equities segment started by ISS.
September 15, 2005 Approval of ISE’s Corporatisation and Demutualisation Sche
me by SEBI.
October 20, 2005 Switchover to Direct Client Dealing commences in ISS.
November 24, 2005 ISE re-registered as a “for profit” company, limited by shar
es.
November 24, 2005 Board of ISE reconstituted in tune with the Corporatizat
ion and Demutualization provisions.
MISSION
ISE shall endeavor to provide flexible and cost-effective access to mul
tiple markets to its intermediaries across the country using the latest technolo
gy.
OBJECTIVE
• Create a single integrated national-level solution with access to multiple marke
ts by providing high cost-effective service to investors across the country.
• Create a liquid and vibrant national-level market for all listed companies in ge
neral and small capital companies in particular.
• Optimally utilizing the existing infrastructure and other resources of Participa
ting Stock Exchanges, which are under-utilized now.
• Provide a level playing field to small Trading Members by offering opportunity t
o participate in a national market for investment-oriented business.
• Provide clearing and settlement facilities to the Trading Members across the cou
ntry at their doorstep in a decentralized mode.
• Spread demats trading across the country.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
• Sri K. Rajendran Nair - Chairman, Public Interest Director
• Sri A. K. Mago - Public Interest Director
• Sri H. C. Parekh - Public Interest Director
• Sri K. V. Thomas - Shareholder Director
• Sri K. D. Gupta - Shareholder Director
• Sri A. K. Chakrawal - Shareholder Director
• Sri Debraj Biswal - Shareholder Director
• Sri Dharmendra B. Mehta - Shareholder Director
• Sri P. Sivakumar - Shareholder Director
• Sri Surendra Holani - Trading Member Director
• Sri Rajeeb Ranjan Kumar - Trading Member Director
• Sri P. J. Mathew - Managing Director.
LIMITATIONS
The data that is considered for the Comparative analysis of various Mutual Funds
returns of Open-Ended Balanced Growth Fund are only for a period of five year (
31st Dec, 2006 to 31st Dec, 2010) and performance during this period may not be
same in future.
Mutual Funds of only three organizations are taken into account for analyzing th
eir performance, because the time duration of the project is short and limited.
The performances of these funds since inception are not considered.
The study is restricted to Open-Ended Balanced Schemes only. The core details a
re untouched.
The data taken into account for analysis is very general. Confidential data is i
gnored as it is highly sensitive. As a result the information presented in the r
esearch report is limited.
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Grinblatt and Titman [1994] conducted a study that analyzed the performa
nce evaluation techniques and the determinants of mutual fund performance, inclu
ding the effect of the load status on performance. Their data consisted of 279 m
utual funds between 1974 and 1984. Their findings suggest that there is no stati
stically significant relationship between performance and expense ratios and net
asset values, but there is a statistically significant relationship between per
formance and both management fees and loads.
2. Drom and Walker [1994] reviewed international mutual funds by using a po
oled cross-sectional/time series regression model to determine whether load/no-l
oad status, asset size, expense ratios, and turnover rate were related to unadju
sted and risk-adjusted returns. They found no performance difference between no-
load and load funds when using unadjusted and risk-adjusted returns. In fact, pe
rformance was not related to asset size, expense ratio, turnover, or load status
. Their conclusion is that there is no reward for paying a load fee when investi
ng in mutual funds. They assert that mutual funds in the aggregate, whether load
or no-load, earn comparable returns. Their analysis does not support the common
marketing argument that load funds result in incentives for better investment p
erformance.
3. Ippolito [1989] focused on evaluating the overall mutual fund industry a
nd how the performance of a random selection of mutual funds compared to an inde
x fund. Ippolito also considered turnover rates. The data in this study consiste
d of 143 mutual funds during the period of 1965-1984. The results of this study
indicate that mutual funds with higher turnovers, fees, and expenses earn rates
of return sufficiently high to offset the higher charges. These results were con
sistent with the notion that mutual funds are efficient in their trading and inf
ormation-gathering activities.
4. James L. Kuhle and Ralph A. Pope analyzed the load vs. no-load issue in
relation to the investment horizon. They hypothesized that there is an investor’s
indifference period. That is, assuming that there is no significant difference i
n risk-adjusted gross return performance between load and no-load funds and that
annual expenses are greater for no-load funds than load funds, a point is reach
ed in which the returns for a no-load and load funds are the same. Further, give
n an expanded investment horizon, it was hypothesized that the overall performan
ce of the load fund investor would surpass that of the no-load investor. The res
ults of this study indicate that there is no statistical difference in the magni
tude of the expense ratio between load and no-load funds, with no-loads having a
higher average expense ratio. However, the difference in average net returns wa
s not statistically significant.
5. Lybos Pastor and Robert F. Stambaugh (2000) developed and applies a fram
ework in which beliefs about pricing models and managerial skill play roles in b
oth performance evaluation and investment decisions. Evaluating and Investing in
Mutual Funds combines both data and Judgement. Using a sample of 2,069 U.S. equ
ity mutual funds, they demonstrate that the returns on non-benchmark assets cont
ain substantial information about fund performance. Compared to the usual estima
tes, the estimates of alpha that incorporate the information in the non-benchmar
k assets tend to exhibit less variation across different specifications of the b
enchmarks. An important practical motivation for mutual-fund performance evaluat
ion is to help an investor decide in which funds to invest.
6. Chen, (1984) performed a cross-sectional analysis focusing on security s
election and market timing abilities of mutual fund managers. This study also in
cluded an analysis of the relationship of load vs. no-load status to overall per
formance. They found that there was no difference between load and no-load funds
when selectivity is considered. Funds with load charges performed no better tha
n those with no-load charges from the period January 1972 to March 1984. Consequ
ently, investors in load funds did worse than those in no-load funds for the giv
en time period.
7. Spuma M. Rao (1996) specifies that an investment company which stands r
eady at all times to purchase its own shares at or near their net asset value is
termed an open-end investment company (or open-end mutual fund). Most of these
companies, commonly known as mutual funds, also continuously offer new shares to
the public for a price at or near their net asset values. Hence their capitaliz
ation is open, with the number of shares outstanding changing on a daily basis.
Some open end companies, known as no-load funds, sell their shares at a price eq
ual to net asset value. Others known as load funds, offer shares through brokers
or other selling organizations, which add a percentage load charge to the net a
sset value. The percentage charged is usually smaller, the greater the amount in
vested, and by law cannot exceed 8.5% of the amount invested. This study examine
s the empirical relation between 12b-1 plans and the mutual fund expense ratios
in a cross sectional sample of 964 mutual funds. By developing a model of factor
s influencing expense ratios, the impact of 12b-1 plan was examined simultaneous
ly with other factors such as size, age, objective, load vs no-load status. The
main conclusion is that the 12b-1 plan did not offer economic value to sharehold
ers; in fact, the existence of the plan resulted in increased expense ratio.
8. Arnold L. Redman, N.S. Gullett and Herman Manakyan (2000) demonstrated t
hat the Investors can choose to purchase shares in various domestic funds or fur
ther diversify their holdings by investing a portion of their portfolios in inte
rnational and/or global mutual funds. The financial success of an internationall
y diversified mutual fund portfolio depends partly on the ability of the total p
ortfolio to generate risk-adjusted returns equal to or greater than the domestic
stock market. Success is also determined by the ability of the international fu
nds within the portfolio to match or outperform market benchmarks. Generally, th
ere are potential diversification benefits to adding global funds to portfolios
of domestic mutual funds. Mutual funds that invest solely in foreign securities
or in combinations of U. S. stocks outperformed the U. S. market over the past t
en years. A portfolio of funds investing in Pacific Rim issued stocks tended to
have greater risk-adjusted returns compared to a portfolio of funds investing in
European stocks and only a small relationship to returns in the U.S. stock mark
et. It is also interesting to note that the relative risk-adjusted performance o
f U.S. and international equity funds may differ substantially depending on the
period examined
9. Haslem, Baker and Smith (2008) investigate the relation between performa
nce and expense ratios of 1,779 domestic, actively managed retail equity funds.
They conclude that superior performance, on average, occurs among large funds wi
th low expense ratios, low trading activity and no or low front-end loads.
10. Massa and Patgiri (2008) studied the impact of contractual incentives on
the performance of mutual funds. They found that high incentive contracts induc
e managers to take more risk and actually reduce the funds’ likelihood of survival
. These funds, even with high risk, deliver higher risk-adjusted returns. The to
p incentive quintile of funds outperforms the bottom quintile by 2.70% per year.
Moreover, high-incentive winner funds from one year have a positive alpha of 0.
41% per month in the following year. Focusing on funds’ holdings, they show that a
ctive portfolio rebalancing is the main channel through which incentives increas
e performance.
11. Yan (2008) examined U.S. actively managed funds from 1993 to 2002 to det
ermine the effect of liquidity and investment style on the relation between fund
size and fund performance. He found a significant inverse relation between fund
size and fund performance, especially those funds holding less liquid portfolio
s.
12. Ang, Chen, and Lin (1998) explored equity mutual fund management reactio
n to poor performance using data beginning in 1994. They observed that managemen
t had good reason to be concerned about poor performance, as management compensa
tion is based upon the amount of money under management and performance of the f
und. Their analysis explores possible management reactions to poor performance.
Management could trade more often, reduce costs, take more risks, or adopt a mor
e aggressive marketing strategy. They found that the management of lower perform
ing funds did more trading and had greater expense ratios than the management of
funds that had good performance. We examine these issues and contribute to the
understanding of mutual fund performance by studying a later time period with a
larger sample and by including xed income as well as equity funds. We also contri
bute by considering the role of economies of scale both at the level of the indi
vidual fund and the level of the fund family.
13. Malhotra and McLeod (1997) argue that investors ignore aspects of fund m
anagement other than performance. They also argue that this behavior is suboptim
al in that net performance after consideration of fees and taxes is a more appro
priate measure. They found that fund expenses and tax costs do signi cantly reduce
returns. They found that tax costs are of greater magnitude than the costs of m
anaging the fund.
14. Droms and Walker (2001) studied 151 mutual funds over a 20-year period f
ound no long-term persistence in returns, expenses, or turnover rates. They exam
ine a longer time period than this study, but a smaller sample of investment com
panies. Their ndings could support various explanations. Changes in returns, expe
nses, and turnover rate could be due to changes in fund management or management
philosophy. The possibility that the quality of oversight from the independent
trustees varies over time.
15. Dowen, R. J., & Mann, T. (2004) studied some aspects of mutual fund beha
vior. They found that over time, the managers of larger funds and larger fund fa
milies produce greater returns at lower cost. Much of the difference in performa
nce is related to differences in portfolio objective and may be due to the time
period studied. The mutual fund industry is a concentrated industry with nearly
three fourths of the equity assets and more than 65% of the xed income assets hel
d by the largest size. These larger funds had the lowest tax cost ratio. For the
individual investor, the conclusion that larger funds that are members of large
fund families are more likely to produce superior returns at lower cost.
References:
1. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman, “A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns a
nd Performance Evaluation Techniques,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analy
sis, Vol. 29, No. 3, September 1994, pp. 419-444.
2. Droms, William G., and David A Walker, “Investment Performance of International
Funds,” The Journal of Financial Research, Vol. XVII, No. 1, Spring 1994, pp. 1-1
4.
3. Ippolito, Richard A., “Efficiency with Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fu
nd Performance, 1965-1984,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CIV, February
1989, pp.
4. James L. Kuhle and Ralph A. Pope “A Comprehensive Long term Performance analysi
s of Load Vs No-Load Mutual Funds” Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions Vo
lume 13 Number 2 Summer 2000, p.1-10
5. Lubos Pastor and Robert F. “Evaluating and Investing in Equity Mutual Funds”
Stambaugh May 18, 2000 p.1-49
6. Chen, Carl R., “A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Mutual Funds’ Market Timing and Sec
urity Selection Skill,” Journal of Business and Finance Accounting, Vol. 19, No. 5
, September 1984, p. 659-675.
7. Spuma M. Rao “ Does 12B-1 Plan offer Economic Value to Shareholders on Mutual f
unds? ,”The Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 9 Number 3 Fall 19
96 p. 1-36
8. Arnold L. Redman*, N.S. Gullett* and Herman Manakyan “ The Performance of Globa
l and International Mutual Funds” Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions Vol
ume 13 Number 1 Spring 2000 p.75-84
9. Haslem, John A., Baker and Smith, “Performance and Characteristics of Actively
Managed Retail Equity Mutual Funds with Diverse Expense Ratios,” Financial Service
s Review, Vol 17, Issue 1, Spring 2008, pages 49-68.
10. Massa, Massimo and Rajdeep Patgiri, “Incentives and Mutual Fund Performance: H
igher Performance or Just Higher Risk Taking?” The Review of Financial Studies, Vo
l. 22, Issue 5, May 2009, pages 1777-1815.
11. Yan, Xuemin, “Liquidity, Investment Style, and the Relation Between Fund Size
and Fund Performance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 43, No
. 3, September 2008, pages 741-768.
12. Ang, J., Chen, C. R., & Wuh Lin, J. (1998). Mutual fund managers’ efforts and
performance. Journal of Investing, 7, 68 –75.
13. Malhotra, D. K., & McLeod, R. W. (1997). An empirical analysis of mutual fun
d expenses. Journal of Financial Research, 20, 175–190.
14. Droms, W., & Walker, D. A. (2001). Persistence of mutual fund operating cha
racteristics: Returns, turnover rates,and expense ratios. Applied Financial Econ
omics II, 457– 466.
15. Dowen, R. J., & Mann, T. (2004). Mutual fund performance,management behavior
, and investor costs. Financial Services Review, 13, 79–9
OBJECTIVE:-
To provide investors long term capital appreciation along with the liqui
dity of an open-ended scheme by investing in a mix of debt and equity. The schem
e will invest in a diversified portfolio of equities of high growth companies an
d balance the risk through investing the rest in a relatively safe portfolio of
debt.
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Cash Current Assets NA 10.52 NA 54.72 174.78
GOI Sovereign NA 8.59 NA 44.68 27.43
Bajaj Finance Ltd. NBFC 17.1 5.84 NA 30.38 -0.44
Reliance Industries Ltd Petrol, Gas 17.46 3.6 189,983 18.72 -10.1
Bharti Airtel Ltd Telecom 16.15 3.44 496,808 17.89 10.66
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engi and Cap Goods 34.92 3.37 89,887 17.53
-3.69
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 3.19 145,278 16.59 136.57
ITC Ltd FMCG 29.32 2.65 801,833 13.78 -0.23
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 2.65 46,065 13.78 -5.01
Tata Motors Ltd Auto & Ancillaries 40.57 2.62 110,348 13.63 17.88
SECTOR ALLOCATION
Auto & Auto Ancillaries 3.29
Banks 8.56
Construction and Infrastructure 1.72
Consumer Durables and Electronics 2.11
Current Assets 10.52
Custodial, Depository, Exchanges and rating agencies 1.5
Electronics & Electrical Equipments 2.44
Engineering and Capital Goods 7.45
FI 3.89
FMCG 2.65
HFC 3.5
Media and Entertainment 1.94
NBFC 7.72
Paper and Natural fibre 1.01
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 5.48
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 4.49
Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 2.05
Power Generation 0.71
Power Transmission 1.79
Realty 0.94
Retailers 3.65
Software and Consultancy Services 6.6
Sovereign 8.59
Steel and Ferrous Metal 1.03
Telecom Services 3.44
Tourism and Hospitality 1.32
Utilities - Gas, Power 1.61
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
RISK&RETURN
Scheme Performance (%) as on Dec 24, 2010
1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception
-0.15 -1.53 7.71 11.83 1.54 15.07 16.04
SECTOR ALLOCATION
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Magma Shrachi Finance Ltd. NBFC 11.95 14.98 40 4 -0.75
Cash Current Assets NA 14.21 NA 3.8 241.21
Hindustan Lever Ltd FMCG 31.68 7.27 65,000 1.94 1.48
Hindalco Industries Ltd Non Ferrous metals 19.15 6.17 80,000 1.65
-2.02
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engi Cap Goods 34.92 5.84 8,000 1.56 -3.55
Gas Authority Of India Ltd Petroleum, Gas 17.37 5.5 30,000 1.47
19.96
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 15.97 5.34
25,000 1.43 -1.34
HCL Technologies Ltd. Software and Consultancy Services 29.01 5.29
35,000 1.41 74.42
Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. Banks 12.51 5.19 85,000
1.39 -3.82
PTC India Ltd. Utilities - Gas, Power 36.24 4.51 100,660 1.2 -11.03
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
Banks 11.65
Construction materials 2.63
Current Assets 14.21
Engineering and Capital Goods 5.84
FI 6.96
FMCG 7.27
Mining and Minerals 4.61
NBFC 14.98
Non Ferrous metals 6.17
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 9.36
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 6.52
Software and Consultancy Services 5.29
Utilities - Gas, Power 4.51
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd NBFC 16.78 5.21 NA NA
NA
Emmar MGF Land Pvt. Ltd. Realty NA 5.03 NA NA NA
Infosys Technologies Ltd Software and Consultancy Services 29.54
2.99 NA NA NA
Reliance Industries Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 17.46
2.69 NA NA NA
Bharti Airtel Ltd Telecom Services 16.15 2.55 NA NA
NA
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 2.48 NA NA NA
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd HFC 32.5 2.46 NA
NA NA
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 2.42 NA NA NA
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Software and Consultancy Services 33.12
2.35 NA NA NA
Axis Bank Ltd Banks 19.34 2.29 NA NA NA
SECTOR ALLOCATION (%)
Auto & Auto Ancillaries 5.63
Banks 17.1
Construction and Infrastructure 0.96
Construction materials 3.24
Current Assets 0.37
Diversified 1.18
Engineering and Capital Goods 6.83
FI 0.99
FMCG 1.92
Food & Food Processing, Beverages 1.1
HFC 2.46
Mining and Minerals 0.47
NBFC 11.11
Non Ferrous metals 1.5
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 6.97
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 4.92
Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 1.78
Power Generation 1.11
Power Transmission 1.93
Realty 6.48
Retailers 1.03
Shipping 1.51
Software and Consultancy Services 8.65
Steel and Ferrous Metal 1.99
Sugar 1.28
Telecom Services 2.55
Textiles 0.17
Tourism and Hospitality 1.37
Utilities - Gas, Power 3.4
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
RISK&RETURN
Scheme Performance (%) as on Dec 24, 2010
1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Since Inception
0.04 -0.44 9.25 15.5 4.33 13.69 14.79
RETURNS
Mean -0.34 Treynor -0.48
Standard Deviation 3.61 Sortino -0.22
Sharpe -0.12 Correlation 0.93
Beta 0.91 Fama -0.05
SBI MUTUAL FUNDS
SBI EQUITY MUTUAL FUND
Scheme : Open Ended
Nature : Equity
Option : Growth
Inception date : Jan 1, 1991
Face value : 10
Fund size : 459.25 as on Nov 30, 2010
Minimum investment : 1000
Entry load : Entry Load is 0%.
Exit load : If redeemed bet. 0 Year to 1 Yea
r; Exit load is1%.
Objectives:-
To provide the investor Long-term capital appreciation by investing in high grow
th companies along with the liquidity of an open-ended scheme through investment
s primarily in equities and the balance in debt and money market instruments.
ASSET ALLOCATION
Equity Debt Cash & Equivalent
92.49 0 7.51
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 7.17 110,046 32.93 112.47
Coal India Ltd. Mining and Minerals 52.89 4.95 NA 22.73 NA
Oil & Natural Gas Corpn Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products
16.81 4.62 170,379 21.22 -4.28
HDFC Bank Ltd Banks 31.38 4.49 90,226 20.62 36.35
Bharti Airtel Ltd Telecom Services 16.15 4.32 550,868 19.84
10.87
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 4.23 170,092 19.43 44.15
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 24.66 3.51 209,836
16.12 29.52
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 22.53
3.36 70,012 15.43 -9.99
Page Industries Ltd Garments, Fashionwear, Lifestyle 32.87 2.83
89,540 13 NA
Cipla Ltd Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 27.87 2.77 370,555 12.72
-2.58
SECTOR ALLOCATION
Auto & Auto Ancillaries 10
Banks 15.89
Chemicals 2.13
Construction and Infrastructure 2.35
Current Assets 7.51
Custodial, Depository, Exchanges and rating agencies 2.74
Engineering and Capital Goods 2.34
FMCG 2.61
Food & Food Processing, Beverages 2.71
Garments, Fashionwear, Lifestyle 2.83
Media and Entertainment 1.86
Mining and Minerals 4.95
NBFC 2.29
Non Ferrous metals 1.97
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 10.76
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 6.28
Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 3.36
Software and Consultancy Services 5.59
Steel and Ferrous Metal 1.8
Telecom Services 4.32
Textiles 1.81
Transportation, Supply Chain and Logistics Services 1.93
Utilities - Gas, Power 1.97
SECTOR ALLOCATION (%)
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Reliance Industries Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 17.46
8.53 88,750 8.76 -9.92
Infosys Technologies Ltd Software and Consultancy Services 29.54
5.94 20,000 6.1 2.71
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 5.57 50,000 5.72 -1.52
HDFC Bank Ltd Banks 31.38 4.26 19,132 4.38 74.79
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 22.53
4.19 19,500 4.3 -9.84
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engineering and Capital Goods 34.92 4.08 21,500
4.19 -15.41
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd HFC 32.5 4.06 60,551
4.17 0.29
ITC Ltd FMCG 29.32 3.65 219,194 3.75 22.27
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Banks 48.05 3.24 70,000 3.33 2.34
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 3.21 11,000 3.29 -5.09
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
Auto & Auto Ancillaries 6.31
Banks 21.02
Construction and Infrastructure 0.48
Construction materials 0.91
Consumer Durables and Electronics 2.68
Current Assets 2.37
Engineering and Capital Goods 4.08
Fertilizers, Pesticides & Agrochemicals 0.22
FI 1.78
FMCG 3.65
HFC 4.06
Media and Entertainment 0.03
Mining and Minerals 2.71
Non Ferrous metals 3.11
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 14.66
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 5.13
Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 4.19
Power Generation 0.82
Power Transmission 1.06
Realty 0.03
Software and Consultancy Services 11.47
Steel and Ferrous Metal 4.25
Telecom Services 1.4
Tourism and Hospitality 1.25
Utilities - Gas, Power 2.33
SECTOR ALLOCATION (%)
NAV
YEAR 31-03-2010 31-03-2009 31-03-2008 31-03-2007 31-03-20
06
NAV 24.9041 14.458 22.4469 19.1692 19.8465
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
UTI OPEN ENDED EQUITY GROWTH FUND
YEAR 31-03-2010 31-03-2009 31-03-2008 31-03-2007 31-03-20
06
NAV 48.39 26.67 38.22 30.7 32.12
Objective
The scheme will adopt a passive investment strategy. The scheme will invest in s
tocks comprising the S&P CNX Nifty index in the same proportion as in the index
with the objective of achieving returns equivalent to the Total Returns Index of
S&P CNX Nifty index by minimizing the performance difference between the benchm
ark index and the scheme. The Total Returns Index is an index that reflects the
returns on the index from index gain/loss plus dividend payments by the constitu
ent stocks.
ASSET ALLOCATION
Equity Debt Cash & Equivalent
99.03 0 0.97
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Reliance Industries Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 17.46
9.53 19,548 1.93 -9.64
Infosys Technologies Ltd Software and Consultancy Services 29.54
8.4 5,566 1.7 3.1
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 7.49 13,259 1.51 68.51
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engineering and Capital Goods 34.92 5.91 6,127
1.19 -3.86
ITC Ltd FMCG 29.32 5.15 60,569 1.04 0.66
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd HFC 32.5 5.07 14,928
1.03 0.69
HDFC Bank Ltd Banks 31.38 4.6 4,069 0.93 0.57
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 4.41 2,980 0.89 -4.81
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Software and Consultancy Services 33.12
3.11 5,843 0.63 2.65
Bharti Airtel Ltd Telecom Services 16.15 2.51 14,090 0.51
11.29
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
Auto & Auto Ancillaries 7.52
Banks 20.41
Construction and Infrastructure 0.72
Construction materials 1.23
Current Assets 0.97
Engineering and Capital Goods 5.91
FI 1.22
FMCG 6.93
HFC 5.07
Mining and Minerals 0.67
NBFC 0.42
Non Ferrous metals 2.99
Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 14.47
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 3.74
Power & Control equipment Manufacturer 2.21
Power Generation 1.68
Power Transmission 0.98
Realty 0.64
Software and Consultancy Services 13.24
Steel and Ferrous Metal 4.07
Telecom Services 3.01
Utilities - Gas, Power 1.9
SECTOR ALLOCATION(%)
SBI OPEN ENDED INDEX GROWTH FUND
YEAR 31-03-2010 31-03-2009 31-03-2008 31-03-2007 31-03-20
06
NAV 44.609 25.8283 41.577 34.8498 30.4901
ASSET ALLOCATION
Equity Debt Cash & Equivalent
99.88 0 0.12
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Reliance Industries Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 17.46
9.6 63,266 6.24 -15.08
Infosys Technologies Ltd Software and Consultancy Services 29.54
8.46 18,013 5.5 -3.02
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 7.55 42,957 4.91 -7.15
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engineering and Capital Goods 34.92 5.95 19,833
3.87 -9.22
ITC Ltd FMCG 29.32 5.22 197,097 3.39 -4.74
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd HFC 32.5 5.12 48,396
3.32 -5.76
HDFC Bank Ltd Banks 31.38 4.66 13,252 3.03 -4.85
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 4.44 9,630 2.88 -10.41
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Software and Consultancy Services 33.12
3.14 18,968 2.04 -3.52
Bharti Airtel Ltd Telecom Services 16.15 2.53 45,574 1.64
4.39
TOP 10 HOLDINGS
Stock Sector P/E Percentage of Net Assets Qty Value Percenta
ge of Change with last month
Reliance Industries Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products 17.46
11.53 NA NA NA
Infosys Technologies Ltd Software and Consultancy Services 29.54
9.66 NA NA NA
ICICI BANK LTD. Banks 30.06 8.52 NA NA NA
Larsen & Toubro Limited Engineering and Capital Goods 34.92 6.92 NA
NA NA
ITC Ltd FMCG 29.32 5.98 NA NA NA
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd HFC 32.5 5.87 NA
NA NA
State Bank of India Banks 19.48 5.55 NA NA NA
HDFC Bank Ltd Banks 31.38 5.5 NA NA NA
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Software and Consultancy Services 33.12
4.1 NA NA NA
Oil & Natural Gas Corpn Ltd Petroleum, Gas and petrochemical products
16.81 3.47 NA NA NA
CONCLUSION
The information in this project report will provide the investors the basic know
ledge about Mutual Funds and enable them to choose the best investments suiting
their risk/return profile. Basing on the information in this project, recommenda
tions made to investors are as follows:-
Mutual funds provide regular and steady income to investors.
Systematic investment plan in Mutual Funds is the best tool for sound investment
to small investors who prefer investments in installments.
Liquidity, transparency, well regulated and flexibility are some of the features
of Mutual funds which is very advantageous to investors.
The entry load and exit load in Mutual Funds is very low which does not affect t
he ultimate yields.
Safety of funds & positive rate of return over inflation are the basic two needs
of traditional investor. Mutual Fund is well equipped to cater to these basic d
esires of investors.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. Thomas S Y Ho: Security valuation, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2009 2
. S.Kevin: Security Analysis and Portfolio Management, PHI Learning, New Delhi,
2009
2. Punithavathy Pandian: Security Analysis and Portfolio Management, Vikas Publi
shing House, New Delhi, 2009
3. Sudhendra Bhat: Security Analysis Portfolio Management, Excel Books, New Delh
i, 2009.
4. Shashi K Gupta: Security Analysis Portfolio Management, Kalyani Publishers, N
ew Delhi, 2010
NEWS PAPERS
The Economic Times
The New Indian Express
MAGAZINES
Business World
WEBSITES
www.mutualfundsindia.com
www.stockholding.com
www.moneypore.com
www.amfiindia.com
www.moneycontrol.com