HAIRBRUSH, SARA N 16038 10TH AVE SW BURIEN WA, 98166

WASHINGTON STATE dba DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING

P.O. Box 9030
Olympia, WA 98507-9030

Notice to WASHINGTON STATE dba DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING.

XXXXX, 2011

RE Letter dated February 15, 2011 / License #: 1212121212 / Case/Item No.: 1212121212

Dear “Driver Records”,

I am writing in response to the details for the person HAIRBRUSH, SARA N. and its driving
privilege.

You indicate that “if you have issues with the attorney WILLIAM P HARRIS you need to clear this
up with him.” In my first letter I indicated that “my attempt to switch from partial monthly payments
to a single one-time payment for the full balance due” is in fact clearing up issues with WILLIAM P
HARRIS. So, by your instructions to “clear things up” seems to insinuate, without being direct, that
clearing things up is not being done. It is my understanding that by my attempting to pay WILLIAM
P HARRIS is in fact, good faith in discussion and negotiation and can be characterized as “clearing
things up”. It is my understanding that this kind of response from “Driver Records” is deliberate and
willful misrepresentation on the part of the author of the above mentioned letter from “Driver
Records”, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING.

It is my understanding that as circumstances change that parties have a duty to discuss and negotiate
in good faith to resolve any issues to the satisfaction of those involved. Your letter also indicates that
the author of the above referenced letter identified only as “Driver Records” will only discuss and
negotiate in the narrowest view within the guidelines “as required by law”. It is my understanding
that this is not discussion and negotiations in good faith, but rather an excuse and an artifice used to
compel me to act in a way that suits only the agents of WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING. It is also my understanding that those guidelines are actually statutory in nature and not
“law” per se and that failure to distinguish between statute and law is gross negligence equivalent to
fraud.

It is my understanding that driving is an activity that is specifically commercial in nature and that
vehicles are machines used in commerce and that a license is permission to engage in an otherwise
unlawful activity. Thus far I have kept a license valid for my person, SARA HAIRBRUSH, because it
is my understanding that the vast majority of governmental bureaucrats such as police officers, etc,
are not able or unwilling to discern the difference between traveling and driving and are trained to
extract the maximum amount of revenue by way of this ignorance through force and coercion. Since
all of my operation of my automobile is concerned with traveling or journeying at this time, my
activities are such that a driver’s license is not something that is required in my regular routine.
It is my understanding that this notice and all concepts as described herein will stand as the
agreement between myself and those of the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING unless rebutted point-by-point, relevantly and unambiguously by a living man or
woman signed with an original autographed signature. Replies sent anonymously such as those
signed off as “Driver Records” will be disregarded. If no one within the DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING is willing to take a position in person in the same capacity as myself, then our
agreement stands as outlined herein.

So, again, I would like the author of “Driver Records” of the DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING to
extend the deadline of March 14, 2011 by 120 days.

In the alternative, I would like a certified, verified letter from the DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING indicating that I have an unqualified right to travel or journey in my automobile
without the need of permission and that by doing so, while not engaged in commerce, no
license is required.

Until this matter is resolved to my satisfaction, I hereby rescind all previous agreements
and associated signatures with WASHINGTON STATE and the DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING and expect that the doctrine of Respondeat Superior to take effect with the
Agency Director, Liz Luce, if this request is dishonored.

It is my understanding that upon resolution of this matter, it will be communicated to

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING by the clerk of the court, just as non payment is outlined
in RCW 46.29.310 .

For HAIRBRUSH, SARA