Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kamaruzzaman Sopian
Solar Energy Research Institute, Universiti kebangsaan Malaysia
(National University of Malaysia), 43600 angi, Selangor Malaysia
Nilofar Asim
Solar Energy Research Institute, Universiti kebangsaan Malaysia
(National University of Malaysia) 43600 angi, Selangor Malaysia
E-mail: n_asim2001@yahoo.com
Tel: +60-3-89214592; Fax: +60-3-89214593
Nowshad Amin
Solar Energy Research Institute, Universiti kebangsaan Malaysia
(National University of Malaysia), 43600 angi, Selangor Malaysia
Saleem H. Zaidi
Gratings, Incorporated, Albuquerque, NM 87107
Abstract
1. Introduction
Solar photovoltaic (PV) industry has maintained sustained growth rates over last 15 years [1], and the
future outlook appears to be even brighter considering continuously increasing oil prices and ensuing
environmental concerns [2]. Most of this growth has been confined to economically advanced
countries (Germany, Japan, and US), and has been tied to grid-connected applications [3]. The growth
of PV industry can, in large part, be attributed to subsidies and tax incentives provided by governments
[3]. In order to meet rising demands, the PV manufacturing sector has increasingly adopted automation
Can a High-Tech Silicon Photovoltaic (PV) be a Cottage Industry? 264
to increase throughputs [4]. This has come at the expense of very high capital equipment costs. The
cost of solar PV is still more than an order of magnitude higher than that produced by conventional
fossil-fuel based sources.
At the other end of the spectrum, the need for PV energy in poor, and developing countries is
real, and urgent. However, the technology is not cost-effective unless some creative mechanisms to
offset costs can be developed. The lack of grid-network in most of these countries can actually be
considered as a plus [5], since it can potentially lead to electricity generation at the point of need, and
thus stimulate the accelerated development of micro grid models [6]. Several economic analyses have
shown that de-centralized energy distribution using small power generators is both environmentally
and economically feasible [7]. In order for this to happen, the solar PV generation must be drastically
reduced. We investigate an alternate approach aimed at solar PV cost reduction by tailoring the
technology to the socio-economic culture of the society. Such an approach must include some of the
elements listed below:
• Creation of a PV-based cottage/community industry,
• Manufacturing processes tailored to the specific environment, and
• Creation of educational and technical infrastructure to support PV technology.
In the work presented here, almost entire equipment and manufacturing processes were based
on low-cost, simple, manual operation.
The Solar PV industry encompasses a wide range of technologies; only some of which are
suited for cottage industry environment. Fig. 1 shows a simplified drawing of the principal PV
technology sectors from starting point of Si purification to the end product in system integration. The
creation of solar-quality Si feedstock from raw quartz represents the most complex, and expensive
technology sector. Most multi-national solar companies are vertically integrated from crystal growth to
module fabrication. The processing and equipment costs become increasingly simpler and less
expensive as we move from left-to-right in the PV technology sectors described in Fig. 1. In this paper,
we examine the feasibility of the module manufacturing process conversion into a simplified, cost-
effective cottage-industry model.
Figure 1: Principal solar PV technology sectors from raw material to system integration.
2. Experimental Work
Fig. 2 describes a simplified diagram of the solar module manufacturing process. Equipment
manufacturing companies have developed completely automated systems to do almost all of the
processes outlined in Fig. 2. Such systems, although highly effective, are expensive. We focused on a
low-cost, manually-oriented approach to perform almost all of the processes described in Fig. 2.
Figures 3-7 show pictures of various simple layout stations for tabbing, stringing, pre-lamination
assembly, testing, framing, and final characterization. All the equipment was designed and fabricated at
our own facility except for the NPC vacuum laminator that had to be purchases, and proved to be the
most expensive equipment of the manufacturing process. The solar cell and modules were purchased
from vendors.
265 Kamaruzzaman Sopian, Abdul Latif Ibrahim, Nilofar Asim, Nowshad Amin and
Saleem H. Zaidi
Figure 8: Profit/loss analysis for module manufacturing operation in developing and advanced countries.
Considering that the startup equipment costs for a manually-operated system are estimated to
be ~ 10-15 times lower than a fully automated manufacturing facility, we expect manual/cottage
industry approach to be economically beneficial.
4. Conclusion
In this study, based on some assumption, profit/loss analysis for module manufacturing operation in
developing and advanced countries showed that breakeven point is reached for ~ 0.75 MW/year
productions for a manually-operated facility, while in an advanced country it is reached at ~ 2
MW/year capacities assuming a fully-automated manufacturing facility. These results revealed
considering that the startup equipment costs for a manually-operated system is estimated to be ~ 10-15
times lower than a fully automated manufacturing facility, we expect manual/cottage industry approach
to be economically beneficial. Further work is in progress.
269 Kamaruzzaman Sopian, Abdul Latif Ibrahim, Nilofar Asim, Nowshad Amin and
Saleem H. Zaidi
References
[1] Arnulf Jäger-Waldau, 2006. ” European Photovoltaics in world wide comparison”, Journal of
Non-Crystalline Solids, 352(9-20), pp. 1922-1927
[2] Website of the Cobalt Power Systems, Inc.,
http://www.cobaltpower.com/docs/wp_env_benefits_1.7.pdf
[3] Zahedi, A., 2006. ” Solar photovoltaic (PV) energy; latest developments in the building
integrated and hybrid PV systems”, Renewable Energy, 31(5) pp. 711-718
[4] Website of the Solarcoating Machinery, http://www.solarcoating.de/
[5] Celli, G., Pilo, F., Pisano, G. and Soma, G.G., 2005. “Optimal participation of a microgrid to
the energy market with an intelligent EMS”, Power Engineering Conference, IPEC 2005. The
7th International, 2, pp.663-668
[6] Lovins, A. B., Kyle Datta, E. , Feiler, T. , Rábago, K. R. , Swisher , J. N. , Lehmann, A. and
Wicker, K., 2002.” Small Is Profitable: The Hidden Economic Benefits of Making Electrical
Resources the Right Size”, Rocky Mountain Institute
[7] Website of the http://ecosyn.us/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Bulk_Sand