Affidavit of Specific Averment

Date: January 10, 2011

To: [STATE OF OREGON]

c/o John Kroger
Attorney General
1162 Court St NW
Salem, OR 97301-4096

From: Pixie, Affiant

c/o Linda Jones, Notary
112 my street
Douglass, near [82801]
Wyoming
Non-domestic, without the U.S.

I, Pixie, hereinafter “affiant”, being competent to testify do state that the following points
are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and understanding. Affiant declares
such under his full unlimited commercial liability.

1. It is the Affiant’s belief that there is a necessity to cause a determination in the purpose
of use of a legal fiction to endanger the affiant, supported by a bill of particulars, in order to
allow for more expedient remedy in any further claims against such legal fiction or the affiant.

2. It is the Affiant’s belief that [JOHN QUINCY DOE a/k/a PIXIE] is a legal fiction.
Affiant relies upon the following evidence to support this claim:

a. [Chicago Manual of Style, whose editors wrote “Writing names in all caps is
not conventional; it is not Chicago style to put anything in all caps;
“We're not sure in what context you would like your proper name to appear in all caps, but
it is likely to be seen as a bit odd.”]
b. [The Manual on Usage and Style, Eighth Edition, published by the Texas Law
Review in 1995, states in Section D, CAPITALIZATION,
paragraph D: 1:1: “Always capitalize proper nouns. [Proper nouns], independent of the
context in which they are used, refer to specific persons, places, or things (e.g., Dan, Austin,
Rolls Royce).” Paragraph D: 3:2 of Section D states: “Capitalize People, State, and any
other terms used to refer to the government as a litigant (e.g., the People's case, the State's
argument), but do not capitalize other words used to refer to litigants (e.g., the plaintiff,
defendant Manson).”]

Document Number: FRCP-9-ASNA-2011-P-1 Page Number: 1

 c. [U.S. Government Style Manual, March, 1984 edition Chapter 3,
Capitalization, prescribes rules for proper names: “Proper names are capitalized. [such as]
Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, Anglo-Saxon.” At Chapter 17,
Courtwork, the rules of capitalization, as mentioned in Chapter 3, are further reiterated: “In
the titles of cases the first letter of all principal words are capitalized, but not such terms as
defendant and appellee.”]
d. [NASA publication SP-7084, Grammar, Punctuation, and Capitilization, A
Handbook for Technical Writers and Editors. At Chapter 4. Capitalization, it states in 4.1
Introduction: “First we should define terms used when discussing capitalization: “Full caps
means that every letter in an expression is capital, LIKE THIS. “Caps & lc means that the
principal words of an expression are capitalized, Like This“. “Elements in a document such
as headings, titles, and captions may be capitalized in either sentence style or headline style:
Sentence style calls for capitalization of the first letter, and proper nouns of course.
Headline style calls for capitalization of all principal words (also called caps & lc). [Here
we see that in headlines, titles, captions, and in sentences, there is no authorized usage of
full caps].
At 4.4.1. Capitalization With Acronyms, we find the first authoritative use of full caps:
“Acronyms are always formed with capital letters. Acronyms are often coined for a
particular program or study and therefore require definition. The letters of the acronym are
not capitalized in the definition unless the acronym stands for a proper name.” This cites
that using full caps is allowable in an acronym. Acronyms are words formed from the initial
letters of successive parts of a term. They never contain periods and are often not standard,
so that definition is required.]
e. [Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, 1996, states: “legal fiction: something
assumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption.”]
f. [Gerald and Kathleen Hill, authors of The Real Life Dictionary of the Law,
describe the term legal fiction: “Legal fiction. n. A presumption of fact assumed by a court
for convenience, consistency or to achieve justice.]
g. [Oran’s Dictionary of the Law, 1999, this definition of legal fiction is found:
“A legal fiction is an assumption that something that is (or may be) false or nonexistent is
true or real. Legal fictions are assumed or invented to help do justice. For example, bringing
a lawsuit to throw a nonexistent “John Doe” off your property used to be the only way to
establish a clear right to the property when legal title was uncertain.”]

3. Affiant specifically negatively avers to and denies the existence of any evidence of a flesh
and blood contract in the name of [JOHN QUINCY DOE a/k/a PIXIE].

Document Number: FRCP-9-ASNA-2011-P-1 Page Number: 2

 4. It is Affiant’s understanding that the aforementioned points as presented in this form
complies with the rules governing the procedure regarding legal fictions [Fed Rules Civ. Proc.
(FRCP) 9 (a)(2)] and unrebutted shall stand as an undisputable point of FACT in any matter
whereby the [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] by or through any agent of any political,
corporate, or municipal subdivision shall bring claim against or charge the previously mentioned
ens legis.

“Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions”

Further affiant sayeth naught.

_________________________________
Without prejudice
Pixie - :
c/o Notary Acceptance
Linda Jones
112 my street
Douglass, near [82801]
Wyoming
Non-domestic, without the U.S.

JURAT:

STATE OF WYOMING )
) ss:
COUNTY OF DOUGLASS )

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this ________ day of _____________________,
by_____________________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who
appeared before me.
___________________________________
(seal) Signature
Linda Jones, NOTARY PUBLIC

Document Number: FRCP-9-ASNA-2011-P-1 Page Number: 3