Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MAJORITY GROUP
The majority is the group, and usually there is only one majority group or very small number of majority groups, with the most power and control in the society. Control the major institutions (economy, government, education, science, medicine) Run important groups and organizations Own or control most of the important resources (money, information, media, formal social control) Members of the majority have better opportunities compared to minorities and usually enjoy better lifechances. They have the necessary resources to control their destiny, protect themselves and their loved ones from the capricious forces of nature and society, and achieve their dreams and goals. They have the power to shape social institutions to their advantage. Often members of the majority see themselves as superior to minorities and often that belief gets strong support by an ideology of superiority embedded deeply into the culture and social practices. Believe they have a proprietary claim to privilege, power, and prestige Label minorities as inferior; minority chars as inferior or deviant While not every member of the majority group sees themselves as superior to minorities or acts that way, majority superiority/minority inferiority is so deeply embedded in the culture and social structure that is operates as an unconscious, background assumption working behind the scenes, even if some majority persons don't acknowledge it or try to resist its influence. The majority has a primary interest in maintaining its control of institutions and resources. As a result, majority members often feel threatened by minorities, fearing the minority is trying to take away what they've got. The majority often responds defensively to situations, using violence if necessary to protect its property, power, position, advantages, and opportunities.
MINORITY GROUP
Minority groups lack access, resources, privileges, and opportunities; they are systematically excluded from positions of power and wealth or limited in what positions and power they can attain. Minorities have less power over their daily lives, often the victim of social forces and trends, lacking many of the resources needed to control their destiny. Rather than shaping social institutions, the lives of minorities get controlled by institutions that serve the interests of the majority.
Minorities as a group systematically experience unequal treatment compared to the majority group. Minority group members often experience prejudice, discrimination, and oppression at the hands of majority group members or disadvantages and discrimination when dealing with the core institutions and organizations in the society.
The main forms of majority group acceptance are: Fusion (sometimes called Amalgamation) Groups and subcultures blend together, forming a new group (e.g., interracial marriage in Brazil). This is the highest level of majority group acceptance, a true "melting pot." No strong evidence of a true melting pot in American society. Assimilation (sometimes referred to as Integration) Majority allows (even encourages) minority groups to adopt the dominant group's culture. Creates a "melting pot" heavily biased towards the majority (more accurately a "salad bowl" than a "melting pot"). There are three general levels of assimilation, each representing a deeper, more profound acceptance of minorities by majorities: Economic assimilation [Working together] This occurs when minorities can get jobs and establish careers in economic sectors with high wages and salaries and low unemployment. Within these sectors, it means minorities filling organizational positions with managerial authority, decision-making power, and influence over organizational policy. Social assimilation [Living together] A deeper level of assimilation occurring when minorities can move from ethnically and racially segregated neighborhoods and buy housing in communities with a high percentage of majority populations. Intimate assimilation [Marrying each other] A deep level of assimilation that occurs when majority and minority individuals intermarry and mix at primary group levels. In the United States the successful assimilation of white ethnics (e.g., Italians, Poles, Irish, etc.) into the majority WASP society has created an American culture based on "Anglo-conformity." White ethnics voluntarily gave up (even rejected) many of their distinctive cultural practices and eagerly adopted the ways of the Anglo/WASP majority. Examples English as the "unofficial" language used throughout the United States "Suburban lawn, white picket fence" ideal for housing Christmas trees (German practice) & Christmas cards (English custom) Altering surnames (Zimmermann becomes Carpenter; Rittinghuysen becomes Rittenhouse; Rivoire becomes Revere; Whittier was originally Feuillevert) Skinny, fair skinned standards of feminine beauty Coats and ties as the "official" business costume for men (and similar formal modes for women) Generally this assimilation followed a three step process: First economic assimilation created conditions for social assimilation, which opened up opportunities for intimate assimilation. Although Asian ethnic groups have not followed this pattern as strongly as white ethnics, the on-going assimilation of Hispanic populations is following this general pattern. Anglo-conformity has been enormously successful in maintaining peace and stability in our multiethnic society. Around the world and throughout history such a ethnic mixture, especially the astounding number of ethnic groups in America, tends to result in suppression, oppression, violence, and civil war. Not so in America, one of the truly significant facts about our society when compared to others.
Still Anglo-conformity is controversial. Such assimilation required minorities to give up large parts of their ethnic identity and cultural ways and adopt majority practices. While this conformity was voluntary, with many white ethnics eager to become American, it still called for ethnics to reject their heritage (even be ashamed of that heritage), resulting in less diversity and tolerance in our society. Today a weakened form of Anglo-conformity still occurs. Assimilation across racial lines in America has been much less successful. While white ethnics successfully assimilated in the late 19th and early 20th century, assimilation for African-Americans shipwrecked on the racism of Jim Crow society and white immigrants. Some economic assimilation occurred as a result of the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s. Even that was been slow and largely resisted by white society and has not smoothly lead into social assimilation. African-Americans have enjoyed some degree of economic mobility and gained basic civil rights of political participation, access to public services and decreased discrimination in housing. To this day America has not really experienced any significant intimate assimilation between whites and blacks. Pluralism Majority group peaceful coexists with other racial and ethnic groups, each retaining its own subculture. (e.g., Germans, Italians and French co-exist relatively peacefully in Switzerland). While minorities can attempt to force any of these outcomes, the crucial factor is majority group reaction, whether or not the majority "allows" minorities to intermarry with them (fusion), adopt their ways (assimilation), or exist independently (pluralism). Almost by definition, the majority group has the power to dictate the outcome. Even in the case of assimilation, which is usually analyzed from the viewpoint of minorities, the majority has to allow assimilation, often controlling the extent and forms of assimilation.
Historical Examples 97% annihilation of the Native American population by whites (18th and 19th centuries) Australian slaughter of aboriginal peoples (18th and 19th centuries) Turkish slaughter of over 2/3s of the Armenian population (1915-1916) Soviet Purges (1933-35) Hitler's Final Solution (1940s) Idi Amin's genocide in Uganda (1970s) Cambodia's "killing fields" (1975-79) Ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and other areas of the former Yugoslavia (1990s) Sadam Hussein's actions against Kurds (1990s) Segregation Minorities physically separated (spatial and social separation; residence, workplace and social functions) from the majority group, usually forced to live in inferior conditions. Can be de jure segregation mandated by law (e.g., Jim Crow period in the US; Apartheid in South Africa) or de facto segregation based on social customs or practices (e.g., not selling homes to minorities in majority neighborhoods, local school systems, refusal to admit minorities to social clubs, etc.) Segregation is the opposite of assimilation or integration. Where assimilation is allowed to occur, segregation is impossible to uphold. If integration becomes a strong social process and political policy, then segregation will eventually fade away. Like assimilation/integration, there are three levels of segregation, each one deeper and more serious than the ones before. Economic segregation: Labor markets and occupations segmented into majority jobs and occupations and minority jobs and occupations, with minority ones with lower wages and salaries, higher unemployment, and less power. Social segregation: Separate neighborhoods and living arrangements for majority and minority populations, with poorer housing in minority neighborhoods, higher crime rates, and lower-quality standard of living. Intimate segregation: No intermarriage (or low rates of intermarriage) between majority and minority individuals and little mixing of majority and minority populations at primary group levels.
Minority group members accept their inferior status, yet reject segregate themselves by withdrawing from their minority group (e.g., Black nationalism).