Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY TOTAL QUALITY INSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Evaluation Results

The College of Nursing hosted the Faculty Assembly for A.Y. 2011-2012. There were a total of 148 participants/respondents for the evaluation of the program spearheaded by the College of Nursing. There were 15 respondents from the COE; 22 respondents from the CITHM; 7 from CIR; 5 from Administration; 77 from CAS; 10 CCS and 9 from CBA. One of the respondent came from NTP and 1 guest filled up the evaluation form. The overall result of the evaluation from the participants was an average of 87.09% or an equivalence of 4.35 which could be translated as VERY SATISFACTORY based on the scale of the evaluation, the scores from each participant is shown in the graph of each Department below:

Pigura 1: COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

Pigura 2: COLLEGE OF INTERNATIONAL TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT

Pigura 3: COLLEGE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Pigura 4: ADMINISTRATION

Pigura 5: COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES

Pigura 6: COLLEGE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

Pigura 7: COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

The respondents were asked to rate the program on the scale of 5- Excellent, 4- Very Satisfactory; 3Satisfactory; 2-Needs Improvement and 1-Unsatisfactory. The scores from each sector are shown in the graphs below. I: SEMINAR TOPIC 1. ATTAINMENT OF OBJECTIVES 2. APPLICABILITY AND USEFULNESS 3. EXTENSIVENESS OF INFORMATION

Pigura 8: SEMINAR TOPIC

II. RESOURCE SPEAKER 1. KNOWLEDGE OF THE TOPIC 2. CONTENT 3. CLARITY 4. METHOD OF PRESENTATION

Pigura 8: SEMINAR TOPIC

III. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: 1. PUNCTUALITY 2. TIME MANAGEMENT 3. ATTENDANCE 4. ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITY

IV: FACILITIES: 1. VENUE 2. TECHNICAL ARRANGEMENTS

V.

FOOD: 1. QUALITY 2. QUANTITY 3. SERVICE

Out of the total 148 respondents, 28 (18.21%) provided their comments on the program.

Summary of Comments on the TQIDP Program: 1. Breakfast serve is porridge; how about those who already have taken their breakfast; coffee should be served. 2. Treat us with dignity. 3. Very good 4. So far so good. 5. Dr. Villar was resource person unfortunately she was given a very limited time 6. Limit the number of speakers 7. What's meeting without coffee? 8. Coffee please. 9. since it is AM substancial quantity and quality is expected 10. good job for the CON 11. good job for the CON 12. more power 13. Teaching Start or creating a culture of research by Dr. Allan de Guzman USTY. 14. good job 15. Thank you for providing us additional knowledge regarding role of teacher to our students 16. Congratulations 17. Congratulations 18. Thank you and more power 19. Excellent 20. No coffee was served 21. More time to be alloted to the speakers 22. Started late program not followed 23. Next time serve coffee 24. Congratulations job well done 25. Very Enriching 26. Consider audience participation 27. Research related topics 28. The program started very late it was supposed to be at 8AM but it started at 8:45 There were 12.1% or 18 out of 148 faculty respondents who suggested topics for future seminars. The following are the Topics suggested:

1. LPU as a School with A Heart 2. Professional Ethics for College Professors 3. How to Become a Stand Up Comedian Teacher 4. Pedagogy 5. Dealing with Difficult students 6. Teaching Strategies 7. Stress Mgtnt, Fear management
8. Stress Mgtnt, Fear management 9. Strategies, Methods of Teaching 10.Hexagon water for perfect health 11.Hexagon water for perfect health 12.Stress management 13.seminar on Curriculum Development 14.Applicable for teaching college level 15.Teachers right 16.Methods and strategies for OBE 17.Interactive teaching strategies 18.Write"unleash" international

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi