Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Saturday, June 4, 2011 Captain Kirk never said "Beam me up, Scotty!" Ilsa Laszlow never said, "Play it again, Sam," and Sherlock Holmes never said, "Elementary, my Dear Watson." But there these misquotes are, firmly lodged in the public consciousness, even though they appear nowhere in the original works. The same is true for things "said" that is, widely believed to be said but not actually said by political figures. Sometimes a misquote is cooked up by opponents or parodists as a way of discrediting or mocking the figure. Sometimes a line is attributed to a widely admired person as a way of making it sound more authoritative, like when someone co-signs a loan. And sometimes it's just a mistake. Here are 10 of the most widely believed but completely bogus things ever "said" by political figures.
- Eoin O'Carroll, CSMonitor.com
house!"
Sarah Palin
It was actually comedian Tina Fey, who was impersonating Ms. Palin on Saturday Night Live who uttered this line that is now widely attributed to the former Alaska governor. The basis for this line comes from a September 2008 interview with ABC News's Charles Gibson, who asked Palin what insights she had from her state being so close to Russia. She responded: "They're our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska." This is true. As Slate has pointed out, on a clear day, those on the Alaskan island of Little Diomede can see the Russian island of Big Diomede, located across the
International Date Line some two and a half miles away. Given that Big Diomede has no permanent population, the amount of foreign policy experience one can gain from staring at it is debatable. But you can see Russian soil while standing in Alaska.
Then they laugh at you. Then they attack you. Then you win."
- Mohandas Gandhi
This line is probably the best summary of Gandhi's philosophy of satyagraha as you can get in 16 words. But there's no evidence that the Great Soul ever said this. We don't know where this quote came from, but it is strikingly similar to something that the trade unionist Nicholas Klein gave in a 1914 address to the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America in Baltimore: "First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you. And that, is what is going to happen to the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America."
Latin America, and the only regret I have was that I didn't study Latin harder in school so I could converse with those people."
Dan Quayle
Dan Quayle has certainly uttered his share of malapropisms, solecisms, and straight-up absurdities, but he didn't say this one. According to the indispensable urban-legend-debunking website Snopes.com, the quote originated in 1989 with Representative Claudine Schneider of Rhode Island, a Republican. Speaking to a group of fellow Republicans, she recounted that the she and Quayle had attended an event at the Belgian embassy, where vice president Quayle complimented Schneider on her command of French (this was back when speaking French wasn't regarded as a political liability). Schneider then attributed to Quayle the belief that Latin was the lingua franca of
Latin America, before concluding that the whole story was a joke. But many publications, including Newsday, The Chicago Tribune, Newsweek, and Time, reported Schneider's joke as fact, further cementing in the public consciousness the perception of the vice president as an intellectual lightweight.
For that reason, let a prince have the credit of conquering and holding his state, the means will always be considered honest, and he will be praised by everybody because the vulgar are always taken by what a thing seems to be and by what comes of it; and in the world there are only the vulgar, for the few find a place there only when the many have no ground to rest on. Needless to say, this is considerably more nuanced than the stick-figure consequentialism commonly attributed to the Florentine political theorist. What's more, it's not clear that Machiavelli is being completely serious here. Philosopher and writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau long maintained that "The Prince" was a work of satire that sought to expose the cynicism of one-man rule. This doesn't sound that far-fetched when you consider that Machiavelli was arrested and tortured by agents of the Medici family, whose members he dedicated "The Prince" to. And there's no denying that Machiavelli had an impish streak; during his later years, he wrote several popular and politically stinging satirical comedies for the stage.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0603/Political-misquotes-The-10-most-famous-thing s-never-actually-said/