DC Insolvency: 1.

On August 2nd, 2011 the DC Trust formed in 1871 against our will and when women and persons who are nonwhite had no vote will enter bankruptcy as it cannot pay on a $14 trillion dollar debt. Nations who own the majority of this debt can and will foreclose on the Incorporated Trust once the US defaults. But not if Susan Herbert moved to foreclose on the US first and was successful hence the IMF fell too as it was never legal and the unjust men involved knew it and so now other nations cannot afford to pay The People what they owe us. As I foreclosed on the Trust thereby the rest of Earth first and no objection came as I stated the whole truth aka actual reality than YOU owe US, The People. What claim can any nation make against actual reality? If France borrowed money and so still owes us a debt for both WWI & II plus interest and now it owes us damages, what claim can it make that W I & WWII never happened? All France can do is pay up or concede. See last pages under The Plan To Vote .

2.

The People can make good on $14 trillion as our intellectual property is worth many times more than that amount so the rest of Earth owes us as we made ourselves solvent by gifting our intellectual property to The People not the DC Trust. The DC Trust then not The People is insolvent and bankrupt as it always was and always will be. Moral bankruptcy and financial bankruptcy go hand in hand. Check the Supreme Court record: I secured default first, on 11/05/08, as the US aka the DC Trust can may enter one answer alone, guilty, or it must fail to answer at all choosing default and it chose default thus concession (to prolong the agony, I suppose). If you install a foreigner as the Executive default is obvious but the unjust insist they must see the piece of paper so I secured it. I foreclosed on the unjust element across planet Earth on behalf of the constitutionally set government known as The People thus China owes us and exactly me for Korea, Vietnam and Iraq plus damages. As it cannot pay me what it owes me as that much money does not exist and even if it did money is not actual reality but only a lie you were led to believe? Then I thus The People own China and every other nation on Earth as they accepted aid from the US and failed to

make any return and/or they all participated in the IMF when the IMF is a legal impossibility.

3.

As the IMF is dependent upon the 1871 Trust and the UN can t exist w/o it or us then FDR had to first create the IMF ceding the institutions to the IMF as that s all the 1871 incorporation is, institutions not constitutions, and later file the so-called UN Treaty fully knowing it wasn t legal. If FDR ceded anything he ceded DC to the IMF. The UN can t exist w/o the IMF first existing. If you create the IMF first then you can t have a legal Treaty with the UN. You can t cede anything to a nonexistent legal entity nor can you enter a Treaty with a nonexistent entity as it won t exist until the IMF does. The UN might be standing; does it exist as a legal entity? Why build it if they might not come when you do? It s not legal reality if the Treaty was never filed and if its existence is dependent upon the IMF which in turn is dependent upon the 1871 Trust which MUST fail as its designed to fail or rather the DC Trust is intrinsically, fatally flawed as it was created. The vote DC casts in Congress not proscribed by law but by the DC Organic Act? That tips the balance of power in favor of death so it has to fail and will fail. Today we know: The Trust was broken irreparably when it failed to impeach Clinton on a charge of perjury. Clinton was installed in anticipation of the looming bankruptcy as unjust men now need to control you via controlling a commander in name only who s will is the will of the group not his own. Thus he or she will not act independently when bankruptcy is so America is ripe for a physical invasion and other nations will claim they have cause when in reality they do not. A foreign invasion is dependent upon your diminished capacity. Bill Clinton couldn t argue his way out of what is IS and Hilary Clinton, our current not legal Secretary of State, gave a speech in which she says that she did not know the CFR controlled the US until she was an adult or: Until her husband was installed in the Whitehouse when he was not qualified and when nobody ever heard of him. This speech is online; you read the transcript or you may watch the video of her saying this. Did you know at least two sitting Presidents and a Secretary of State legal or not truly believed that the Council on Foreign Relations not

foreign nations but some private club

orders us about? Obama truly believes this too.

The Pentagon Papers were just published in their entirety so you your own self can read how at least two other Presidents, also the product of the DC Trust and two party monopoly, lied to you fully intending to deceive you re Vietnam.

4.

Unjust men did nothing but act to escalate the injury

a criminals acts like a criminal as

is is a state of being - until finally DC cannot pay on August 2nd, 2011 when the payment is due but The People can, will and did make good on this $14 trillion. You cannot value what we own: Uniformity, the actual structure of time and when life actually begins in the womb as well as what the force that causes our human heart to beat spontaneously looks like. Its knowledge that is priceless on its own but the advancements this knowledge leads to are also priceless; China would give us anything we asked for in order to receive the benefit of our intellectual property. What then is the only possible settlement as no nation can pay us what we are owed? The People then own the Earth and everything on it including all 6 billion or so humans. You can only pay what you owe in terms of people. Legally I then own you not the other way around as first I did it on my own and then I brought the class forward. China won t balk as we proved its nuclear threat is empty and then we developed the knowledge to meet and exceed any newer weapon it devises. I already tested my theory. That s what Uniformity allows you to do, to see the invisible and to know the seemingly unknown. Conducting successful reconnaissance missions was easy for us as China doesn t get it: If money has become your opiate then we will let you get very drunk before we attack; buy all of the worthless debt you can as you are had. It s the same for the DC Trust for if you re reduced to committing crimes in plain sight yet denying your own words and actions then it s only a matter of timing: Jefferson told us you d volunteer to die before you ever left office so we sat back and let you commit suicide. Recognizing logician Kurt Godel s Incompleteness Theorem and a paradox I know the

whole truth as it s universal - I looked and as you will read in my Motion I discovered that the UN Treaty was filed 4 months after the IMF was created so it, both the UN and the IMF,

were never any good. Note: We voted down the League of Nations twice so everyone knew if they were going to force the UN on us they would have to violate the spirit of the law as well as the letter. They did. As for other nations knowing? Great Britain s Lloyd s of London issued its first ever re-insurance policy against the DC Trust in 1871. Thus everyone knew the DC Trust and the IMF/UN were not lawful or even possible.

DC cannot pay on its debt therefore it is bankrupt. When the IMF acts to foreclose we can and do make good on this debt thus we foreclose on DC. As the value of our intellectual property greatly exceeds $14 trillion we then call in every past due loan we ever made; as the IMF cannot pay us we foreclose on the IMF. Once the IMF is no more we then have foreclosed on every single nation as they all went bankrupt when the IMF did. To prevent foreclosure and to liberate themselves from e as I (we) now own the Earth and everything on it we make our demand: BECOME CONSTITUTIONAL & MEET US AT THE BAR UNDER STRICTEST STADARD THE HONOR BOND OR ELSE. As other nations have everything to

win and nothing to lose as you cannot possibly fix the IMF that form is always and forever intrinsically, fatally flawed DC? then every nation WILL see it our way. As we foreclosed on

BYE BYE SITTING OFFICERS, as INSOLVENCY=DISSOLUTION

More re insolvency so you might place it in context of the US, world and universe: What might a federal judge know but not own? You do not own the knowledge as wisdom that you already own the truth as you are that truth. You ve never been an authority case of o.j., you ve never been in compliance with the EP&DP clauses and/or you ve never actively but only passively used learning that is genetically encoded in humans. You never tested yourself so you never had that experience of life thus you know it intellectually but

not as wisdom. I added this as #4 (within complaint) but I ll go here again as you might not own the application, the facts or the actual reasoning: A very important date is looming in the near future, August 2nd, 2011. The Americans are going to default on the $14 trillion dollar debt on this date. It will be the SECOND time the US has defaulted not the first time as the US First officially defaulted on 11/05/08. Did it ever occur to you, a judge, that Susan Herbert colluded and conspired with the Office of the Solicitor General to then force default to occur? What if Susan Herbert wrote to the Office clearly reasoning why only default was the answer only default would be legal as I asked the unanswerable federal question so that any and all responses other than default would be criminal due to the existence of a waiver when that waiver itself is a legal impossibility? Ask yourself: If you are a paid Officer acting under the 1871 version of The Constitution does the Solicitor General have the right to waive your rights if the Chief Clerk of SCOTUS has already threatened to violate your rights criminally by denying you informed consent and so all of your other rights and he says that he has a way to then keep you in the dark for all time as he controls the docket and the other court clerks? If you had no opportunity to object and you truly believed direct entry was not possible, may the Solicitor then waive your rights or is it unlawful as YOU then were denied a hearing in person in any court? I made an attempt to reason the point of law regarding the Judiciary never being set so now the Judiciary must be of the ability to set themselves but I was never going to be able to reason everything they needed to know as the gap in knowledge was so great and events were continuing to transpire so that conditions changed. Do you see how by denying us a hearing in person what you are actually doing is denying yourself a hearing? So then, once I secured that first default I then contacted North Korea, China, the Hague and a few other nations or world courts. I told them my plans and that I had won the day. Our $14 trillion dollar debt that was mostly held by China then? That debt is effectively erased as soon as I set foot inside a federal courthouse thus our debt returns to zero as no nation can ever pay me what they owe me and then all Americans. China s bill would be a

bill for Korea, Vietnam and Iraq with interest plus damages. France s bill?Unpaid WWI & WWII loans with interest. I d levy damages but France does a great job damaging it own self and cruel and unusual punishment is not legal. Arguing the case across the Earth as no other nation has an elegant form of government I then calculated that no nation on Earth could ever pay us as that much money does not exist in reality but even if it did it is worthless. The only thing these nations have that ever covers the debts they owe us and that is actually valuable? THEIR PEOPLE! I, Susan, successfully pressed a case that then makes me the owner of every human on Earth. Now, you re my hostages i.e. slaves. I claimed title to the universe and won it. The reason the US is about to default on these loans thus then be owned by whomever carries the majority of this debt on August 2nd, 2011 is the IMF, created by the Brettonwoods Agreement. FDR ceded the US Treasury to the IMF but as the US Treasury is The People he could not possibly cede us to the IMF. FDR told himself and others involved that the US Treasury was Fort Knox or was Incorporated DC when that is not possible as gold and paper money does not act on its own and so has no power and authority it can lend to itself or to the paid Officers. Money empowers nothing and no person under US law. The existence of the IMF was contingent upon the US being a member and its main supporter. Then other nations would also join but the problem with all of this is the IMF was created - designed to be a pyramid scheme. It was never not going to collapse so

when you combine that with the fact that FDR had no legal power to cede The People or award our custody to the rest of Earth to everyone and everything but our own selves

then you have no rational basis for the IMF. When other nations agreed to participate they did so based upon the fact that they truly believed all of this was humanly possible and was legal; they were counting upon America to then support them and their nonsense when the energy needed to support this scam is nonexistent. As I know FDR, I know bad math is a pattern and I know crooks then I, Susan, knew to look up the dates of the IMF and the UN as to ceded the US Treasury to the IMF the UN would first have to exist as a legal entity and the UN cannot exist as a legal entity

unless FDR first agrees to act to do what is a crime as the UN is dependent upon the IMF first existing. You might recognize Kurt Godel s Theory of Incompleteness at work here: For the IMF to exist the UN has to exist as a legal entity we have a legal Treaty with but for that to happen first the IMF must exist; if the IMF exists first then FDR has agreed to do what is a crime FDR has agreed to cede our custody to the IMF thus the UN before we have a legal Treaty with the UN as that entity, The UN, will not exist until he does so. Once the UN exists as FDR has created the IMF with no power and authority to do so and when it s not possible as the UN does not yet exist as we have never legally acknowledged it THEN he can enter a Treaty with it! Is your head aching yet? If FDR presents his twisted logic to the Congress NOBODY on Earth is going to go along with this. I knew as absolute fact FDR had to circumvent Congress and/or create the IMF and then file the Treaty. That is the only way around his problem was to publicly enter a Treaty but not file it as the Treaty is only good upon filing. Filing is what counts as you can t consent or object until it s a matter of public record. If FDR wants to avoid a criminal prosecution and wants to avoid the wrath of Congress as well as deny you the right, all he has to do is withhold filing and then he can tell himself the lie that it is our fault as we should have known when in reality no person had access to these records and no person understood as wisdom that The People are the government not DC and not paid Officers. So I looked and sure enough FDR first ceded our custody to the IMF thereby creating it and then he filed the Treaty a few months afterwards thus no Treaty existed when he created the IMF via ceding the US Treasury to it. While the UN may have been a physical building standing in NY it was not a legal entity and it was not recognized by the US. The IMF/UN never owned us and no debt then was ever incurred, as it s not possible. You are not actualizing law. All you have been doing is realizing the lies you tell; it s made real as you manifest what you truly believe; you manifested injustice but injustice is not universal law, is it? You created and your creation is the product of lies but precisely as it is not born of law then it is not actual reality. But let s pretend it is as you may not understand what is real is not always actual reality or that we re a nation of law as the universe is of law the

caveat being you can defy nature as that s what sapience allows you to do; you exist according to universal law but then you choose to act or to behave in accordance with nature or against nature, as The Creator does not force you to act: If you ask other nations who or what the government is? They might say The People but most do not and of those who do say The People? They have no grasp of what that then means. When other nations entered the IMF/UN, did they know that not only did FDR violate US law in an impossible way but that eventually every nation not only the US would have to default as these amounts of energy do not exist in this universe and that all nations are doing is assigning arbitrary value to paper money thus then assigning an arbitrary value to the people so that the IMF would become the prison from which they could not escape? Did they fully understand that governments would be forced to print worthless currency to maintain a false appearance and that as it was designed to be a pyramid scheme it had to collapse? Did they know that you cannot possibly pin all your hopes upon Americans as your standard if you then seek to control the American people by buying worthless debt that you know is worthless? The answer is no as when I reason the point of law they then understand the logic dictates that the IMF/UN cannot be good at all in any way as it is not possible. UNIVERSAL LAW DICTATES THIS! Other nations did not know as in they knew but did not own the knowledge US law and US case law is not their native language; they have no life

experience - and so the reason the collapse of the US dollar is so vitally important is that every other nation in the world came to rely upon the IMF thus the Americans. Other nations do not own the knowledge as to why we are so able and capable while they are not. The exactly named class does own this knowledge. We exactly defined what other men could not define. To solve our own economic crisis is then to solve a worldwide economic crisis. What you need is a currency with a universal standard and then the means to institute it which I created by going through SCOTUS as the Sophists calling themselves Nobel Prize Winning Economists do not want you to know that they have solutions only for the effects so their answers are like putting a Band-Aid on a nicked artery. These

economists have a skeleton in their closest: All of their answers REQUIRE that a government assign an arbitrary value to humans so they REQUIRE that you hate women and people with skin color that is other than white. Our plan? When I contacted China and North Korea they knew I made the case. Suddenly the bulk of US debt was then taken on by Japan. I then told them Nice try, but no cigar as Japan owes me for Pearl Harbor as the reasons we fought both world wars ARE NOT American causes at some point we were going to have to intervene as only the Americans had the ability to defeat Hitler as we do not fall for the illusion (or we did not then) so Pearl Harbor never had to happen. Once it did? Then we had another problem: When the Japanese knew they had lost the war they announced they would fight until the last Japanese person was standing or take it to a new level of escalation, complete annihilation, thus we were FORCED to bomb Japan. Japan said: We will kill ourselves and you without any actual reasoning or any actual cause other than we can so we will. That s inorganic insanity. Japan might be under the delusion that it rebuilt itself or that it is successful economically because of something they themselves did but that is not the truth. There is a difference in the way Japanese and the US patents work and the reason that difference exists is due to an American as the business model Japan adopted is an American invention thus any economic success Japan has had is completely due to America. An American who understood that he would never be able to test his intellectual property here in his lifetime volunteered to go to Japan and rebuild it after the war so that he could test his property there. He taught the Japanese their business model. If we never bomb Japan and we never rebuild Japan then Japan never rises again. Since WWII we have been competing against our own selves economically not the Japanese as their model is the property of an American! Because I own this knowledge then Japan can and may buy up worthless US debt but I can yet argue it out of existence. Japan owes me and Japan cannot pay unless it pays in the form of every one of its citizens. The reason I contacted China? If I caused China to react as I predicted then my theory is proven as I am successfully proving the correct behavior of nature that no other human being knows. So the US debt is erased;

in return I argue the IMF out of existence thus every nation is liberated from it as no nation can succeed if they are still imprisoned by it so that every nation has zero debt. The reason we can all go to zero debt is: I possess the universal mean that can, will and does float a universal currency. If you ve been following Iceland s and Greece s insolvency you know that that the people are broken and rioting in the streets; it is said that Greece owes three times its energy. Greece cannot produce that energy any more than Congress can as that s the law of conservation of matter and energy: There s a set amount of energy in this universe and that energy changes form so energy is not being created nor destroyed. Greece belongs to the European Union, the modern day Romanesque empire. The latest Nobel worthy opinion I have heard is that the euro dollar is killing Greece. They are comparing Greece to England and claiming that while the euro works for England it doesn t work for Greece. How is that possible if they all joined a union? It s only possible if your monetary system enforces a class system and a denial of liberty. The person proffering this opinion kept referring to the euro dollar as currency when it is not claiming that it s Greece s currency that s the culprit. And then he told the truth: He said that the brilliant idea they had was to create another bank another bank! and so there would be two banks in Europe that

somehow supported the Union, with one bank being for poor nations like Greece and Spain and the other bank being for wealthy nations like England and France. Who among you goes to the poor bank when they set out to borrow or deposit money? What, nations that are labeled poor due to some overblown sense of entitlement France has would be barred from the wealthy bank? How is it that if you re born Greek and/or in Greece you are automatically poor? The IMF tried this; did it help any third world nation? Do you need a poor bank or is it that the euro dollar is at fault as are all dollars as they aid and abet your denial of reality, your sense of superiority that is w/o reason? I have an actual idea that is not Nobel worthy as it s not elitist: Shelve your fatally flawed ideas as millions of humans have tried them and they do not work and never will; shelve the fiat debt money system, banks and credit as you now know them and all forms of

money that do not rest upon a universal standard as without a universal standard all you ll experience is generational, endemic poverty, or, the same old result over again. Something has to give so what you need to do is change it up to then secure different results not be a passive victim of circumstance: On August 2nd, 2011 all outstanding US debt is called in; I answer by informing the planet of my good math: Dear Earth, The answer is: Nope, as we did not default as only DC defaulted thus on 11/05/08 all US debt became actually worthless and even carried a negative balance but yet you bought it. As you acted upon the belief that DC was and is the government when that Trust was not legal and never will be as it itself exists in open and direct violation of the Constitution due to the DC Organic Act that accords DC a vote in Congress, a vote that our Constitution does not allow for and that our Founders did not allow for as DC is not the constitutionally set government and that is what this vote is meant to install, an institution as the government, then you incurred the loss; you not me are liable. The DC Organic Act is dated 1871 and my absolute proof that on some level all of these nations had to know this was not legal and never would be? Lloyd s of London, a syndicate still in operation, as upon these actions Llloyd s then issued the world s first reinsurance policy, a policy meant to re-insure businesses operating in America as once the unlawful Trust was then these businesses had no insurance against losses, did they? Lloyd s issued its first re-insurance policy against America in: 1871. Thus on some level other nations had to know but yet participate. DC defaulted and every other nation defaulted but not The People; The People did not default! By my calculations you still owe me as I won all 6 billion of you and then I liberated you from the IMF so that you yet owe me. Upon the US debt dropping to zero and upon the dissolution of the IMF thus your debt drops to zero, we institute a

universal currency and so the only repayment you can ever make to us? The only award you have in your possession that you can grant to us? EVERY PERSON ON EARTH MUST ACT TO LIBERATE THEMSELVES AS INDIVIDUALS AND AS WHOLE NATIONS; THEY MUST FORGE THEIR OWN INDEPENDENCE BY DECLARING THEMSELVES AND INSTITUTING JUST GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE ACTUALLY CONSTITUTIONAL AND ARE ELEGANT. OR ELSE: I OWN YOU LEGALLY! I cannot give you liberation; liberty, by its very nature, is something that you must act to secure for yourselves. Your governments cannot buy you back as I OWN YOUR LEADERS AS WELL! There s nobody you can pay but me and I do not buy and sell human beings. I might come to own them as a court award your custody is now mine - but I cannot sell you what is not mine to sell as you are born into liberty by your very nature as sapient creatures. You can adopt our form or you can devise your own form based upon the elegant forms you find in America; you can avoid all of our mistakes and you have something we did not: you have the absolute proof that these elegant forms work in actual reality so that one lone vote can, does and will move an entire planet as I set the example for you. If I can do it then you can and as I know every nation s distinct identity as I demonstrated in my world suit then you have no excuse as it s possible and you will not become a copy of America. Your friend, Petition 07-9804, 08-6622 & 09-677 as 3 times is the charm. What will follow is every nation on Earth then is only as valuable as its citizens willingness to abide by universal law. This means each lone person decides his or her own worth so that it is no longer dependent upon outside things and arbitrary, transient values. If you have value and you own this knowledge than your currency does as we have a common understanding, people who value themselves so highly do not accept victimization and they do not go to these cheap places humans have been going to as it is no longer acceptable as it never works. For the very first time ever third world nations will have the

power and authority to pull themselves out of poverty, famine and pestilence as now the playing field is leveled between America and their person. Once you begin abiding by universal law then everyone is equally as valuable. You retain your uniqueness as a person as all humans are unique but all humans have the same potential in that we all have a gift to contribute. The universal mean that supports your currency? It s the numerical value of the godspark; it s the numerical value of your conscience or your motive and intent. As every human was imbued with sapience it is the same for all of us so that the difference becomes whatever you decide to make of yourself. Thus you are actually independent as no other human can stop you from achieving; no other human has the ability or capacity to prevent your truth and the truth from being revealed as that is a matter of what is universal law not what we make up in our fantasies. Other nations will no longer need US aid as they will now have the ability and capacity to help themselves and they will no longer tolerate the likes of the Obamas of this world or the other penny ante dictators of this world as they will own the knowledge that by acting to harm others or by acting to turn a blind eye to corruption they only harm themselves directly. When human beings have tangible evidence and proof that they ARE valuable and when they have the ability to effect change directly immediate effect when they can vote and that vote has an

then humans exert their best attempt each time and they never accept

less than your best attempt. Harming yourself directly is not necessary as you can help yourself directly. Recently NY Magazine reported that Obama asked 5 or 6 Nobel Prize Winning Economists to come to the Whitehouse; they did. The cover read something like How s that hopeychangy thing working for ya? Obama asked them to tell him what to do . No President legal or not should be asking other people what to do. Asking for advice is one thing but asking to be told what to do is another. It s not up to these economists. Barack Obama asked 5 or 6 Nobel winners what to do and yet he is sitting back and doing nothing when he knows August 2nd will be here and soon? Unjust men are not willing to face up to what

they have done as all of them knew August 2nd was coming; while they could not know default would occur in their lifetimes until 11/05/08 they have had all of that time since then and they have done nothing but make everything worse. Every expert I collected testimony from said that releasing some of our oil reserve as Obama announced he would do is in violation of that mandates original intent or the reserve was not created for this purpose as no severe supply problem exists and that this could very well be our ruination as it s at best a 3 or 4 month fix and you can never use these reserves to solve the problem long term; no oil reserve? China owns you as that reserve is meant to be leverage against the threat of an oil embargo. Once again Obama s exact words are a lie as nothing that happened in Libya or anywhere in the middle east has caused a severe shortage as defined by this mandate; there is no actual severe shortage of or in our oil supply; what Obama is short on is cash. The flawed thinking is if gas prices drop then that cash is then freed up when in reality it isn t as gas is so heavily taxed plus all of that money eventually finds its way into the IMF. All you do is place us in a worse position than before you touched the reserve as currently you are dependent upon oil. If the US enters financial default on August 2nd, 2011? A violent conflict will occur that will then turn into a world war as all any nation needs to invade the US is for the US to default on its loans and then enter a civil war waged by The People against the paid Officers. They, both The People and an invading foreign nation, will possess cause as we did not pay up, did we? Once you are already engaged in a violent conflict then you CANNOT enter a legal claim nor can you avoid death. As you are not abiding by the letter or the spirit of US law then you will have no moral authority and universal law will not be on your side. Default is the door China needs us to open but unjust men keep lying to themselves and so keep claiming that there s something they can do to save the IMF and Federal Reserve as we know it as a private not public corporation. This is not possible as the IMF has to crash as it was designed to do thus the difference between default or not defaulting then is the difference between global liberation or not as without the Americans then already injured people are so incapacitated that they cannot thwart or defeat a physical invasion. The lie

unjust men told themselves? That China would never make a play for global dominance when all China has ever said is it is working to destroy America so it can then take control of Earth. China has announced over and over that it will take advantage of an opportunity to invade. Don t believe me? Not only is China actively controlling supply and demand of oil thus manipulating oil prices but now they are manipulating the supply of rare earths which we use in almost all modern electronics. China undercut the market until every mine in the US closed; mines all over the Earth could not compete with the prices China charged. Once these mines closed? China announced that it will not sell its supply as China will use it. Guess what we use rare earths in? MILITARY EQUIPMENT. A mine in the US then reopened to address the shortage but it cannot produce enough of these minerals to meet our need. To force financial default China not only bought US debt but then exerted undue influence over the global markets and the US via the UN. What, nobody noticed that every major US manufacturer and retailer moved to China? That US citizens who owned these businesses began to negotiate private treaties with China thus they violated US law only to make more money but then have no long term future? You do not maintain a million man army for no reason. North Korea then began manipulating the US via taking hostages. They re testing us. US law is: YOU NEVER NEGOTIATE AS WHAT YOU NEVER NEGOTIATE IS OUR SAFETY; YOU NEVER, EVER VIOLATE US LAW TO GAIN THE APPROVAL OF AN UNJUST, INELEGANT GOVERNMENT. Barack Obama? He openly and directly violated US law when he claimed to be the lawfully set President and Commander but negotiated our safety when he acted to sign or to join the Copenhagen Accord as this accord demands that you cede your sovereignty. Sovereignty Obama never had as he is not a natural born American and he does not own us regardless so now you have a not legal President who is a foreigner according to every definition under US law and case law who may never have voted legally as he may not have ever possessed that right but took it for himself regardless and who somehow holds a Connecticut social security number when he worked in Hawaii as a teenager so should

have held a Hawaiian social security number to then first go to work acting to award our sovereignty to: The Copenhagen Model, a model that objectifies people and personifies things. You might want to take another peek at Godel s work, as you might come to understand the beauty and the absurdity of it all. In this case it was exactly named COPENHAGEN. No matter what form the Copenhagen Model takes it will always be wrong; be it a federal judge, a voter, a treaty, a scientific argument, an accord, a person or a book, this theory will always be wrong and will never even be so much as good theory as who can observe this universe and who can experience this world but yet theorize that the animate arises from the inanimate? They would be the same clowns who are running around Washington DC in a panic as the US will default unless we appear and so whatever they do on Earth they cannot let the citizens know that they could not pay but yet they told The People who could make good on this debt to never, ever tell the truth in federal court again as what they can t have you knowing is that they are so incompetent that they are absolutely unsafe. They are as unsafe as any foreign invader. Before they ever admit defeat they will kill you in a war waged against China when only Ray and I can win such a war as we always knew the key to defeating communism was to out think the enemy. If your starting position is we do not need oil or rare earths as we have something better than nuclear energy that will make for the biggest scientific advancements ever then you have won the war before you ever fire a single shot. A bloody conflict is totally unnecessary; the rest of Earth not encompassed by Washington DC? If they did not want us to liberate them from the IMF they would have objected or they would have acted against us but they did not. I gave everyone plenty of time to act. I gave them advanced warning and I did so three times. Periodically I would contact them, between filings. Earth has my phone number and my address. How easy would it be to stop us if they could? If they wanted to stop us? This easy as I purposely made it easy for them: Give me a passport and a one way ticket. Not one nation once objected in any way. Did you ever stop to reason that maybe, just maybe, as I offered these people

something they never had before, actual hope, that this spurred the recent revolutions you are witnessing across Europe and the Middle East? If I can run Obama all over the US and run China all over the planet then moving other nations is not so hard for me as all I need do is give them an idea, the actual means to a just ending. The US going broke due to a federal budget crisis is not the same thing as defaulting on loans. When we go broke we have failed to fund our government, we cannot make up for a shortfall or no budget has yet been signed into law. Eventually federal employees are paid and resources are provided. When we go broke we do not foreclose on ourselves. Defaulting on loans is bankruptcy so then the bank, the IMF, can and will foreclose on you. But not if Susan Herbert defied a Federal Appellate judge and so placed all of this within her Motion To Reconsider Your Own Destiny And Fate as she knew as long as she got it on the record and it remained on the record then it stands. If this court contacts Andrea within the 11th District Appellate she will be able to produce the documents although the ruling ORDERS her to remove them from the files and mail them back to me. What sane person would pull files from a federal courthouse and mail them back to the litigant as if they never existed? An unsuspecting person. I told Andrea to be forewarned, that as this judge was already in the process of committing a crime as she signs her name Frank when she knew this case is about the false appearance of the paper so that every reader believed she was a man and this was no accident as it was meant to ping your subconscious mind to then make or force you to believe a lie thus your reality is changed then we could depend upon her nature so she would, as absolute fact, order Andrea to remove the files only this order would itself be in violation of the law as that was her only option plus that s the pattern or the pathology of the disease. If liberty and justice was possible then I never would have entered SCOTUS directly. As I did then we know as absolute fact that liberty and justice must have been made impossible from a time before I entered the 11th District. I named a crime committed by the Governor of FL that then served to be supporting proof as if a governor who is in the 11th District has committed at least one crime by my count

(two acts but one charge) that a lawyer then independently confirmed had indeed happened then the Federal Judiciary had to have fallen upon a district wide level as both of these acts were in conjunction with: Federal Court Appeals concerning women. Therefore justice for women and children was never possible in the 11th District. A Federal Appellate judge never needed to violate the law in letter or spirit as the Governor of FL did it for her already as at least one of these cases was then heard in SCOTUS and women lost their lives and unjustly so thus all the Federal Appellate ever had to do is: Hear the case in person. If you believe you can deny your actions by striking the documents removing them from

the files you can t as even if you remove the paper then how do you kill the court clerk so they never testify that they read and filed the documents? If you use fear conditioning to force your clerks to lie then how do you kill the mailman so he never testifies that he delivered the documents? Okay then: HOW DO YOU KILL 300 MILLION PEOPLE TO STOP THEM FROM TESTIFYING? A physical war with China is one way! Once a sitting President commits a crime and it is ruled that he alone is above the law so that he is not guilty when he is guilty then no federal judge needs to commit a crime as Bill Clinton did it for you already. No matter how tempted you are do not waste your energy as it s actually futile. Obama should have known his actions are futile. It is as several Americans have said: These people make Watergate look like child s play , or, it s not about being caught as we already caught you. US V Nixon? Caught you! In Re Susan Herbert? And how! Feeling sorry for any of these people paid and unpaid officers - makes everything worse

as these people aren t sorry; they aren t remorseful and they do not feel guilty; in some cases the ability to feel guilt is not theirs. They will keep killing Americans including those they consider as being of their own kind until they no longer receive any reward for actions that are selfish, greedy and cruel. When they no longer receive whatever they have labeled a benefit then they no longer have motivation to continue.

It s my sworn testimony that although Ray Morton and I knew we owned trillion dollar intellectual property that far exceeds the value of US debt we could not sell it so we could not earn a living from it as then unjust men would exploit it to their advantage. A reward wasn t to be had. They would kill millions of you at once rather than kill you one at a time. They claim that they want it to then protect and defend the US but that is a lie as what they want to do is control the knowledge thus keep it from you. If they have it and you do not then you are at their mercy. A reward might never be in the cards for us under US

law it s an award - and we paid the ultimate price. Does this bother us? Nope. It s difficult to watch criminals be rewarded while we suffer sometimes but we are not angry, resentful or remorseful; we are not sorry we made the decision we made for there was no other choice as any other choice is denying reality in such a way we would offend the Creator. We would be challenging universal law when like no other people on Earth we own it. What secret? Nothing is a secret if you never diminish your own capacity. Secrets do not actually exist in this universe. Unjust men would maintain control of the knowledge for about 5 seconds before China then had it as per usual. In our case even Article 1 Section 8 was violated. Do you realize how incredible this is? Article 1 Section 8 protects the founding documents as our own unique intellectual property but now we cannot benefit from that knowledge, as if the governing documents do not exist and never did? Forget our own unique property as now we were being prevented from benefitting from the scientific discovery known as US law. Ray lit up when I told him I was thinking when I entered SCOTUS directly thus legally I filed what constitutes a good copyright and good patent; I used those exact words clearly reasoning my position as SCOTUS is unique to America; Ray said I may have secured the strictest kind of patent there is then as it would not be subject to time limits as patents are. I told Ray that I had incontrovertible proof that those of us who never violate our ethic are rewarded in the long haul and that unjust men only seem to triumph; I promised Ray that in his lifetime he would be able to benefit and would be able to earn a living upon his own work. Then William Suter and Danny Bickle acted to harm us once more on Ray s birthday; as this could be an injury that is self-annihilating and as I did not know it was set to happen on

Ray s birthday until it was too late to act? I had to find a way to make that promise come true as I keep my promises. As I sat reasoning my position in space as I have a personal and spatial relationship with The Creator an idea struck me. I named the Ft. Laramie Treaty in my first filing in SCOTUS. You must be able to enforce it not merely uphold a clause or two. I can and lucky for us the National Park Service has been holding almost all of that land in trust. It s so simple to enforce it s absolutely ridiculous that no one has done it as allodial title means you cannot make substantive changes so both the National Park Service and the Sioux have the same exact goal. What s the problem? First you must be able to undo every contract going back to the first contract we had in Eden. You must argue federally held lands as bad then reason it forward as then you re standing upon our original governing documents including A Summary View; when Ray once told me to shut up and I did? He named that argument. Before I ever put it down anywhere! I had never even said it out loud. He: Staked his claim. So then, once you enforce the Ft. Laramie contract as that s the only justice you can ever accord the Sioux what happens to the fund that they never accepted?! I forgot about that fund! My reasoning was and is: Once you return the land then you return the original $20 million The People placed in trust. You return it to the very same people. The People do not get to profit from an act of injustice and the Sioux cannot be made more than whole so the balance of about $750 million would then be THE FEE YOU PAY OUT TO THE LAWYERS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MAKE THE CASE!!! These lawyers had to be righteous they are or

else they never would have been able to do this. I, Susan, not once considered this money. Now I did and what motivated me? Preventing another person from being injured and maybe fatally so. I immediately wrote to Ray and said, Remember my promise? Okay Ray, the Ft. Laramie Fund how much of $750 million would make you whole? How much do

you want? as by my reckoning it belongs to us once we repay the original $20 million back. That s our fee. What is so important about this for us?

This would be a particularly sweet award to receive as every single time I asked a lawyer to help I heard: There s no money in it for me. If a lawyer had bothered to tell me they meant FEE not PROFIT then I could have said YES THERE IS but they said no money as in no profit and there is not any profit so I never named the fund or so much as considered it. That $750 million is only worth what Ray and I make it worth so it s not profit but just compensation. That money is only good if we are as it has a universal value not an arbitrary value. Remember, we gifted our intellectual property to The People so if you do no more than add up the value of all of the advancements and new technology that will be made actual reality as a result of our science then you are in the trillions and trillions of dollars. That s why we were harmed as the potential for profit is so great in our unique case. It s

larger than any other discovery so far. It s bigger than Relativity. I told Ray I was going to see to it that an actual check was issued in our names for all of that money minus $20 million as if nothing else then every lawyer alive will have to look at that check staring back at them and know: $750 million could have been mine if only I wasn t so greedy. A lawyer used to tell me all of the fantastical awards attorneys have claimed in various ways; he used to name multi-million dollar settlements that nobody could have foreseen and that some lawyer won accidentally as the lawyer never meant to do it or something changed. He was not naming giant sized class actions but the lone lawyer usually with a lone litigant that results in a huge award. Our fee then would be the largest single fee any attorney ever received and we came by it justly. How does $750 million hit you, or $350 million a piece? We could afford to give every American natural born, naturalized and

illegal - a dollar a piece and we d still have about $400 million left over for ourselves. How much interest accrues per day on $400 million in cash? At the lowest, worst rate a bank offers we would be in the black until the day we died, living off of the interest alone. HA HA lawyers across the Earth, as you told us there was no money in it! You said, There s no money in upholding US law and US case law and as there isn t, I then agreed with you. Money as you meant it? That is not to be found in The Constitution at all and anyways, it is not legal to trade the law upon money or for a profit as that then constitutes buying and

selling people for a profit. You said that unless you acted to overthrow US law thus The People there was no money to be had thus you needed to be able to injure The People so I whole heartedly agreed. If you said there s no money to be had in doing the right thing I would have disagreed and told you as an award not a reward can take any form then I possessed incontrovertible proof the victory goes to the righteous whether you believe it or not. I would have told you about the award that The Creator accorded me as no court on Earth can award what I received. Once you heard my testimony? You would have known that I had to be telling the truth as I knew all of the science, science you know already or that you can check easily. I connected the dots that you couldn t. I then would have given you the Ft. Laramie argument as that court case is about money versus currency and so valuing people as a dollar amount. But you said profit not fee so I agreed with you as it s a simple fact of my life: Against the actual value of our work $750 million means there is no profit to be had!!! You still owe us a price we cannot name but $14 trillion is a start. I then wrote to every Sioux tribe informing them that they might not know it but I actually could enforce the Ft. Laramie Treaty; I told them what they might not have understood as I contacted them before. I told them that we had no evidence that Roberts had ever seen the Petitions, that Marshall ruled for the Cherokee and that all that counted was making it onto the docket as direct entry IS adjudication due to the nature of the case. Then I told them my reasoning regarding the fund and that I was going to enter the court again so that if they had any objection they needed to let me know or else that fund minus the original deposit would be our fee. American citizenship does not demand that Natives give up what makes them unique but they have never known this and thy have never been accorded an opportunity as to this day the federal government keeps money in trust for tribes thus if they need to build something like a drainage ditch they must petition the fed for the money as if they are children not adults; they must ask permission as if they are not in control of their own lives. The fed claims that we have to protect Natives from the folly of their own decisions when

NO WE DON T! If you give Natives all of that money and they choose to buy a couple of million dollars worth of cotton candy? I guess they ll learn from their mistake mistake if it is a

and so not do it again. If it is not a mistake? Maybe they ll buy more cotton

candy; why is the fed so hot to treat them like children? To maintain control of them that s why. It s patriarchy, that s why. I received no objections. I made certain to tell them no answer then is an answer in the affirmative. The US dollar is honor bound; what you know of today began when DC was created as Hamilton got his bank in order to repay our Revolutionary War debts. We then would be the very first nation to do so thus we would have honor and so moral authority that no nation could then deny. All of this went down within an honor bound agreement between Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton. 54 Wall Street was the address of Hamilton s home; said to have created the stock market or at least an early form of it, Hamilton s home was once an actual slave market and it is now the exact address of the NY Stock Exchange. Everything is one and the same; finally the vote has come home to roost! The reason we left a metal standard is exactly this as the legal presumption is the US will always be able to pay and we can we are able to pay as every nation agrees that our intellectual property is the most valuable thus they spend trillions each year in pursuit of it. $14 trillion is small potatoes to us. Ray and I never violated the honor bond. We not only incurred no debts but we paid in full on behalf of all of you when you never once acted for us; we won t experience a return, not even a court date? Something as tiny as a date in federal court is too much to repay upon the debt incurred by you and your existence when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington? You must be a victim of your own excess. It seems to me that you should gladly repay this debt. As It seems to me that we already took care of our own liability award. This won t cost you a cent.

Think: It s a fee but it also makes Ray and I trustees. Our $750 million as it has a universal value as does as your $20 million is then the bank or the physical reserve America rests upon as it allows us to pay if we say we will so it has the same cache as our original honor bond. What other President and Commander who is also the CFO can back their word up with cold, hard cash? I m the first one to actualize the US Treasury so I bring the fortune into the Office with me. These dollars can sit and accrue interest as the interest alone is massive; as you need a representative currency until you conquer the learning curve thus go to zero paper dollars our fee is the currency you stand upon much like Hamilton s bank. It s not about money or amounts of money but about y-o-u and if you can make good on whatever bill of goods you re shoveling our way at any given time. If Ray and I wanted $750 million we d have it as it was there for the taking; we do not need paper to secure what we want and need in life as we have brains. Ray and I along with the class will demonstrate how you trade upon ownership of the knowledge not the pieces of paper. You have everything to gain and nothing to lose but $14 trillion in debt. Lastly, when I claim that you have nothing to fear? You don t as we have changed it up so that the burden of proof falls on the Defendants. We are yet standing upon exactly worded law and case law while these people are not. We entered directly and they defaulted legally in court and in actual reality upon Obama s installation. To meet the burden of proof they must prove absolutely that Thomas Jefferson never lived, that we never became sapient as Eve never picked the apple, that the Earth was never formed and so the universe was never born thus The Creator does not exist; these people must prove that they do not exist and never will. To first meet us at the bar they must concede that the DC Trust was created as a criminal enterprise and that like lawyers are out of nasty tricks they are too as there is no trick available to them that will ever make them actually solvent or actually legal. They can meet us but never exceed us as what you can t exceed is The Creator. They must enter the court upon the claim that the DC Trust never was, is not now and never will be as they (it) denied the Southern states their right of dissolution, engaged in war against The People, shot Lincoln and impeached Andrew Johnson for firing the

Secretary of War, Stanton, thus forcing Executive Order #100 and The Trading With The Enemies Act upon us when US history is: Abraham Lincoln reminded Secretary of State William Seward to his face that he, Lincoln, is the President and Commander in Chief not Seward no matter what Seward might mistakenly believe. Seward? He was born in Florida, New York and he purchased Alaska. It seems as if once again Florida is exactly named as is NY, Alaska and Russia; we even have a kitchen cabinet debate brewing: The Secretary of War another Cabinet position - is the

person Johnson fired when he became President after Lincoln s death. Johnson sought to remove Stanton and replace him with Ulysses S. Grant in violation of the Office in Tenure Act. Johnson vetoed this act meant to protect Stanton claiming it was within his power as the legal successor to Lincoln; that is Would Congress make these appointments or would the sitting President? Congress logic means Congress could force me to keep Obama s cabinet. When Johnson vetoed the act he exactly wrote in like manner appointed and duly qualified thus such an Act could protect an appointment in the event it was not possible to execute procedural and substantive due process. An example is the Post Master General serving or delivering a commission upon or to the Chief Justice; could the Post Master be fired and/or criminally charged as this event would only occur upon endemic criminal corruption and when the Post Master himself is the direct victim of a crime? In this case the act would protect the Post Master for I then would have to invoke martial law against this person when there is an absence of any wrong doing. It s not possible to fire him for there are no grounds. This legal battle is about the balancing and counterbalancing of moral authority and legal power. Grant refused the appointment; Lorenzo Thomas acted to move into the office and Stanton had him arrested. Grant would go on to become President. The battle would go on to become Myers V US in 1926 in which the Supreme Court opined such acts were unconstitutional. I agree in that Congress is writing law and this act s express intent was to protect one person thereby giving Congress power not named in the law. I disagree in that

facts are stubborn but facts change thus current conditions as you came to realize them do protect a civil servant. I can name two who are protected. I, Susan, do not need an Act of Congress or a SCOTUS opinion to know as fact and law what is right or wrong. Congress did not have the requisite moral authority to impeach Johnson thus his impeachment was no good while Clinton s is as nobody involved had actual moral authority thus they, Clinton and the other paid Officers, were equally bankrupt. The persons who sat in Congress when Johnson was impeached owned the knowledge that what they had done was not legal. Although his impeachment failed it never should have begun. Or maybe it should have; maybe Johnson meant to be fundamentally responsible for a Supreme Court case named In Re Susan Herbert as if you tell me that as Lincoln appointed Stanton then even if Lincoln falls Stanton does not then you are telling me even if Lincoln falls Executive Order #100 does not, and that is false as the war conducted by persons in uniform ended: Lee surrendered his sword but not in person. Lee then ended the uniformed fight only as the civil fight is rages on. This is already proven absolutely for when Johnson returned to Congress after sitting as the Executive he was given a standing ovation by the very same persons who once acted to remove him thereby us; they were wrong and they owned it as your actions and so what you manifest are the absolute proof. The reason Johnson s impeachment failed and by one vote? 7 Senators voted against it as they were disturbed by how the proceedings had been manipulated to present evidence in support of only one side, Congress , which is the very same thing that happened to me as opposing council has never entered any evidence or proof at all, not in the family court, not in the state court, not in the federal court and not in the Supreme Court. And so here we are The People having entered the Supreme Court and having been victorious once more as the only sword that actually counts never left our possession: Is the charge, obviously falsified, that The People first violated Thou shall not kill ? We wouldn t need to kill in self-defense if they would stop acting in defiance of nature. Selfdefense is acting in accordance with nature not against it as The People will never not be

liberated and not be independent no matter what the corrupted do or say as sapience is. The charge is levied against them not The People as the cause is nature. Fear not for you have nothing to be afraid of, as there is no defense they or any man can mount against nature. An unjust Congress was not actually remorseful then nor did it actually respect Johnson or us anymore than it does now or they would have acted to abide by the law; instead they continue to violate US law as they believe the contents of their hearts and the truth of their actions thus their persons are a secret . That s the delusion as all of this is in plain sight; nobody ever sued as nobody ever had the capacity until I sued as BVG did not exist. I own the knowledge I am the first absolute and whole class of one in the history of the world and that this then makes me unique in all of this universe as I successfully staked the claim that the Americans are the indigenous people of Earth known as earthlings as we mastered government on Earth becoming creators in our own right, creators that are greater than the sum of our parts.

Andrew Johnson is said to be one of the worst US Presidents in history. We dissent:

Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson?Caught you, pre-emptively.

Susan Forever Pro Se Herbert, on behalf of the class with Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Susan Clemons, Ray Morton and other Voters who also gifted their intellectual property to The People, Richard Pait, Pryce P., Al Franken, Kurt Kallenbach, Tim Thomas, Linda Thomas, Charles Rangel, Rick Webbe , Henry Adams, Tommy Pritchard, A. Snitker, Ron and Cameron

Gardiner, Hugh Everett, Ethan and Christopher Quinones, Wen Ho Lee, The Iroquois, Sioux, Hopi etc. etc. et al