Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 1 of 6

Page ID#: 444

\W.Terry Scannell, OSBNo. 95322 Ilmail: terr),@scannel law.com 650Pioneer Tower ti88S.W.FifthAvenue Poftland, Oregon 97204-2021 'llelephone: (503)776-0806 trax: (503)294-3995 Of Attorneys plaintiffs fbr
IN'fI-IE UNII'ED STATESDIS'I'RIC]'I COUR-f I]OR TTTE DIS'I'RIC OF OREGON f PORI'I,AND DIVISION

D O U G L A S A . J A M E S a n dE I L E E N M .

J,AMES, llusband Wif'e. and Plaintitl's, vs.

) ) ) CivilNo. 3:ll-CV00324-S] ) S ) JTJDGE TTiWART

RECONTRTIST COMPANY. NA. an Unknown F,ntity Operating the Stale in olOregon, BAC HOME LOAN SERVICI,{G LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Tcxas a LimLited ) Pzrftnership. MORTGAGE and ) E]LECTRONIC REGISTRATIONSYSI'EM, ) Il{C a Delaware Corporation. ) Det'endants.
) )

UNOPPOSED OTION FOR M BXTBNSIONOF TIMI.] TO RT'SPOND T O D B F B N D A N T SM O T I O N T O ' DISMISS

LR 7-1 CERTIFICII.TE (fF CONFERRAL Counselfor Plaintiffs,Douglasand Eileern Jamcsccrtiflcsthat on June26 and27. 201l, he conferred with counselfor all DefendeLnts email regarding via this motion,and Defendants not opposethis motion. do

Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 2 of 6

Page ID#: 445

M@ request respectfully pursuanrro R. Civ.P.6(bX1)(A) LR 16.3, Plaintiffs rrnd Fed.

that this Cour-t issue an order extending the deadline fbr Plaintiff's to respond to rcquestthat Complaint. Plaintifl's Arnended Motion to Dismiss Plaintift's' Defendants' to the Court grant them an extension respondto Defcndants'Motion by .luly 5' 2011. 'Ihe this deadline. do Defendants not oppose This requestis not fited fbr the purposeof delay, but rather is the result of the raised by Plaintiftsrequiring additionaltime to respondto the numerousallegations sincc the their response havc been fonnLrlating in Defendants their Motion. Plaintifl-s filing of the Motion. Ilowever, Dcfcndants'Motion contains40 pagcs o1'arguments, in all attacking o1-the causesof aotion raisedby Plaintil-fs their ArncndedCornplaint' by and response thc Plaintif'f-s. analysis which requirein-depth of T'hisMotion is not fited fbr the prurposc delay and no parly will bc prt:.iudiccd by the grantingof this Motion. 'l-[re of'timc will havc no impacton extension requestc,C

in or settings, schedulcs this mattcr. This Motion is supported otherexistingcleadlines, hercwith. filcd concurrently Scannell, o1-'l'erry by the Declaration

' D A T E Dt h i s2 B ' 'd a yo f J u n c2 0 1| . ,

Scanncll /rs/Terrv

'l'erry (OSI3 #853220) Scanncll Suite 650 8188 FifthAvenue. SW 97204 Oregon ['ortland, 'l'el:(503) 2 F 1 7 6 - 0 8 0 6 ,' a x(:5 0 3 ) 1 4 - 1 2 1 4 Law.com I: Ei-mai terry@scannel lbr Of Attorneys Plaintiffs

Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 3 of 6

Page ID#: 446

\fV.Terry Scannell,OSB No. 85322 Ilmail : terry@scannellaw.com Tower 650 Pioneer

S.W. Fifth Avenue tl88

Poftland,Oregon 97204-2021 'felephone: (503) 776-0806 lrax: (503) 294-3995 Of Attomeys lbr Plaintiffs

COURT DISTRICT IN'I'HEUNITEDSI-ATES OF FORTHE DISTRICIT ORDGON PORTL/TND DIVISION

]DOUGLAS JAMES andEILEEN M. A. .tAMES,Ilusband Wifc, and

Plaintiff.s,

( l i v i lN o . 3 : l l - C V 0 0 3 2 4 - S ' l ' J U D G LS ' I ' E W A R ' f DECI,AIIATION OF TERRY ()F SCANNELL IN ST,iPPORT MOTION F'OR IJNOPPOSED I'XTBNSIONOF TIME TO RESPONI) MOTI0N TO TO DEFENDANTS' I)ISMISS

vs. IRIICONT'ITUST COMPANY, NA, an lJnknown lintityOpcrating thc State in ol' Oregon, IIAC HOME LOAN SBRVICIING L|MITED PARTNERSHIP, Texas a Limitccl Partnership, MORTGAGE and IOLECTIIONICREGISTRATION SYSTBN{. llNCa Delaware Corooration.
Defbndants

l, Terry Scannell, declare and testifyas follows: i) | am the attorney for thc I'laintiffs, Douglas and Eileen Jamcsrin the

above-captioned matter. I am competent tesrtify basedon my to and make this declaration

Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 4 of 6

Page ID#: 447

personal knowledge. I make this declaral.ion suppottof Plaintiffs'Unopposed in Motign fbr Extension rime to Respond Defendants' of to Motion to Dismiss. ii) Plaintiflb initiated the conf-erral processwith defensecounsel as required

b'yLR 7-1. Plaintiffsrequested additional tim,; to respond the Motion to Disrniss a to as resultof the numerous allegations raisedby Drefendants their Motion. As a rcsultof in the conferral, Detbndants not oppose do grantingPlaintiffs extension time until July an of 5, 201I to respond Defcndants' to Motion to Disnriss. iii) 1'his requestis not filcd lbr the purposeof delay and no party will be

prejudiced thc grantingof this Motion, 'l'hc rcquested by cxtension ol'time will l-ravc no irnpact othcr existingdcadlincs, on settings, schedulcs this matter. or in

Pursuant 28 U.S.C. 1746, dcolare to I $ penalty pcriury undcr of thatthelbregoing isl trueandcorrect.

D I A T E D h i s 2 8 " ' d a yo 1 ' J u n e , 2 0 l l . t

/s/'l'crry Scannell

Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 5 of 6

Page ID#: 448

COLJRT DIST'RICT IN THE UNITEDSTATES FORTHE DISTRIC]'T OREGON OF PORTLI,ND ]DIVISION

DOUGLAS A. JAMES and EILEBN M. JAMES, Ilusbandand Wif-e,

C i v i lN o . 3 : l l - C V 0 0 3 2 4 - 5 1 ' S .f JDGIi 'l'DWAR'l' t ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION F'OR TJNOPI'OSED OF T]XTENSION TIME TO RESPOND MOTION TO TO DEFENDANTS' DISMISS

Plaintif 1-s. vs. IRECONTRUST COMPANY, NA, an IJnknown EntityC)perating the Statc in ol' Oregon, BAC HOME LOAN SE,RVICIING ILIMITEDPAR'INERSHIP, a'['cxas Limitccl Partnership, MORTGAGE and IDI,ECTIION REGISTRATION SYSITIII\{. IC llNCa Delaware Corporation, Dcfbndants.

lJponthe LJnopposed Motion of the PlaLintitf] additional time to requesting respond Defendants' to Motion to Dismiss, this Court herebyGRAN'fS Plaintiffs' IVlotion and will allow until July 5,2011 lbr Plaintifl's llle their rcsponse to to l)efendant's Motion to Dismiss.

l)atcdthis _

day ol'

. 2 0 t| .

J l - l D G tJ A N I C I l M . S T E W A R ' f 1

Case 3:11-cv-00324-ST

Document 27

Filed 06/28/11

Page 6 of 6

Page ID#: 449

CERTIF'ICA TE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 28th day of June. 2011, a copy of Plaintitts' Motion to Dismiss, to Motion for Extension Time to ltespond Defbndants' of Unopposed Motion for Extension of of of the Declaration Terry Scannellin Suprport the Unopposed l'ime, and the ProposedOrder granting the Motion for Extension of Time were llled Noticc of this filing will be sent by operationof thc Court's electronic electronically. liling receipt. Particsma'/ access filing systemto all partiesindicated the eleotronic on this filing throughthc Court's system.

Scannell /s/'l'errv

'l-erry (OSB#853'220) Scannelt