Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NOTES ON DIAGRAMMING SYLLOGISMS A syllogism is a three-part argument with two premises and a conclusion. A premise gives a statement that should be generally accepted as true. A conclusion is a truth derived from the acceptance of the two premises. Example: All teachers are human beings (and ) Mr. Everett is a teacher (therefore) Mr. Everett is a human being
Premises conclusion
We can diagram the syllogism to see if the conclusion really is acceptable based on the premises. If we accept the TRUTH of the premises and all three statements exist in the same diagram (are VALID in other words) then we must accept the truth of the conclusion. The syllogism and the diagram started with Aristotle in the 2nd century b.c. as a means of creating and validating a deductive argument. Euler simply made a few adjustments.
Here is one way of diagramming a syllogism (created by Leonard Euler in the 18th century):
Since teachers are inside the category of human beings and Mr. Everett is inside the category of teachers, Mr. Everett must also exist inside the category of human beings. Thus, the syllogism is VALID. Here are the two statements combined in one Diagram: human beings teachers Mr. Everett
The circles are actually spheres. Each one exists inside the other. Think of them as balloons inside of balloons. **Remember, you only diagram the premises, not the conclusion. Once youve diagrammed the premises, you simply sit back and look to see if the diagram matches the conclusion. If it does, its valid. Otherwise, its invalid.
2
Symbolic Logic Practice (with Positive and Negative Terms) Part I: SYLLOGISMS
Directions: 1) assign the terms, 2) diagram the syllogism, 3) declare whether the conclusion is valid or invalid based on the premises.
1.
All computers compute stuff, and broken calculators do not compute stuff. Thus, broken calculators are not computers. Steve does not like going to the movies. But Steve is Amish. Thus, the Amish do not like going to the movies. Motorcycles are faster than cars. Also, things that are faster than cars are not as fast as jets. Therefore, motorcycles are not as fast as jets. No keys work in this door, and all keys work in the other door. Consequently, this door is not the other door. Wearing Ties is appropriate in this office. However, wearing ties is not casual dress. Thus, casual dress is not appropriate in this office.
3.
4.
6. People who like sandwiches like fast food, and people who like fast food do not like stew. Thus, people who like stew do not like sandwiches. 7. Since all As are Bs, no Bs are Cs because no As are Cs. 8. No donuts are fat-free because the Bear Claw is a donut and the Bear Claw is not fat-free. 9. All Ds are Js and no Js are Ks; thus, no Ks are Ds. 10. All teachers were once students because all students become teachers and no one who was once a student is a student.
Symbolic Logic Practice II (with Positive and Negative Terms) Part I: SYLLOGISMS
Directions: 1) assign the terms, 2) diagram the syllogism, 3) declare whether the conclusion is valid or invalid based on the premises.
1.
No students who play an instrument are underachievers, Tom is not an underachiever. Thus, Tom plays an instrument. People who smoke have an increased health risk. Juanita does not smoke. Thus, Juanita does not have an increased health risk. A good neighbor maintains his yard. Jim is a good neighbor. Therefore, Jim maintains his yard. No one who eats lettuce dislikes salads, Janie dislikes salads. Consequently, Janie does not eat lettuce. People who fear flying have a phobia. However, Elizabeth does not fear flying. Thus, Elizabeth does not have a phobia.
3.
4.
6. Bodybuilders are healthy because they do not eat unhealthily. 7. Since I dont eat meat, I am a vegetarian. 8. I dont hug trees, so I am not an environmentalist. 9. Republicans support free enterprise; thus, Sam is not a republican. 10. I dont like leeches because they are slimy.
3.
4.
5.
Part II Directions: 1) Write out the following sentence into syllogism form. Pay attention to transitions that signal conclusions and premises. 2) Assign the terms, 3) diagram the syllogism, and 4) declare whether it is valid or invalid. 6. All junk food is unhealthy, but apples are not junk food, so apples are not unhealthy.
7.
No computers are infallable because things that are infallable are perfect and computers arent perfect.
8.
11.
PART IV Directions: 1) Create three of your own syllogisms with negative terms that are valid. 2) Diagram them to prove their validity.
12.
13.
14.
Symbolic Logic Practice II (with Positive and Negative Terms) 1. invalid 2. invalid 3. valid 4. valid 5. invalid 6. People who eat unhealthily are not healty (and vice versa). 7. (impossible to have a type A conclusion with a Type B premise) 8. Environmentalists hug trees. 9. Sam does not support free enterprise. 10. I dont like slimy things. Symbolic Logic Exam: Positive and Negative Terms 1. valid 2. invalid (4 terms) 3. valid 4. invalid 5. valid 6. valid Symbolic Logic Exam: On Positive and Negative Terms Part I: 1. invalid 2. invalid 3. invalid 4. invalid Part II: Part III: 6. invalid 7. valid 8. valid
5. valid
9. All Cs are As 10. No snakes have fur. 11. All rocket scientists are geniuses. (Answers will vary.)
Part IV: