Welcome

Post Goods Issue without reference to order
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 12:44 PM Last Post By: Farhan Qaiser
Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Farhan Qaiser
Posts: 20 Registered: 10/3/07 Forum Points: 0
Post Goods Issue without reference to order

Posted: Jul 13, 2008 10:48 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear All We are using both Account and Costing Based COPA. We do post goods issue with out reference to order. Now our problem is that at the time of post goods issue there is no Profit Analysis document posted in the system and Profit Segment field is not modifiable. We have marked the field profit segment optional in movement type 601. Please let me know what can be the problem. Regards Farhan Qaiser
Cyrus Minab
Re: Post Goods Issue without reference to order

Posted: Jul 13, 2008 6:17 PM response to: Farhan Qaiser in
E-mail this message
Reply
Check the field status variant on GL (OBC4)
Farhan Qaiser
Re: Post Goods Issue without reference to order

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 12:44 PM response to: Farhan Qaiser in
E-mail this message
Reply
I have already done it
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
New content since your last visit Updated content since your last visit
Powered by Jive Software
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Control Panel Your Reward Points Your Questions
Expert Forums SAP Solutions ERP Financials - Controlling
Thread: backup of Cost Center

This question is not answered.
Reply to this Thread
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 1:19 PM Last Post By: vaibhav shah
Daniel Rocha
backup of Cost Center
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi we need to make a backup of Cost Center. Does exists any tools in Sap r/3 for download or make a backup of all Cost Center ? Thank you.
vaibhav shah
Re: backup of Cost Center

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 1:19 PM in response to: Daniel Rocha
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi For backup of Cost Center use transactions code KSH3 from Easy access menu. Using this Transaction code you will be able to find cost center group wise cost center details. You can save the data on your desktop by going to following path System(Menu) -> List-> Save-> Local File In case of further clarification kindly let me know. If satisfied with the answer then please reward. Regards Vaibhav
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Controlling-Cost Centre Accounting.

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 0 - Pages: 1
jalla nageswar ...

Controlling-Cost Centre Accounting.

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 12:17 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Gurus! I am working on 4.7ee,according to client requirement, i have created another(NEW) company code with the same chart of accounts in FI,but created separate Controlling area for the new company-Will there be any issues in the future? Thanks in Advance . Regards, Nageswar Rao Jalla
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Welcome, Udit Sheth
Thread: cash journal

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
kunal ingale
cash journal
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:57 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
hi i want to make business area field mandetory in FBCJ (cash journal) plz help from where to do this points will be rewrded regards kunal
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 11:17 AM Last Post By: Vivek Sahni
neha dhillon
How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 11:08 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear SAP Gurus How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ? ND
Vivek Sahni
Re: How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 11:17 AM in response to: neha dhillon
E-mail this message
Reply
ND SAP provides with two methods of calculating the accrued costs in CO:Target=Actual Method Cost Element Percent method Regards Vivek
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Differentiate between REAL & STATISTICAL POSTINGS in CO ?
This question is answered.
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
neha dhillon
Differentiate between REAL & STATISTICAL POSTINGS in CO ?

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 11:12 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear SAP Gurus Differentiate between REAL & STATISTICAL POSTINGS in CO ? Regards nd
Vivek Sahni
Re: Differentiate between REAL & STATISTICAL POSTINGS in CO ?

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 11:16 AM response to: neha dhillon in
E-mail this message
Reply
NEHA The REAL POSTINGS allow you to further allocate settle those costs to any other cost object in CO either as SENDERS or RECEIVERS.Objects allowed to have real postings include :Cost centres Internal Orders Networks Projects Profitability Segments The STATISTICAL POSTING on the other hand, is only for Information Purpose.Further Settlement/Allocation of these statistical costs to other cost objects is not possible.Such objects are like :1.Statistical Orders 2.Statistical Projects 3.Profit Centres Regards Vivek
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: WBS project currency

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 11:11 AM Last Post By: Edward Threads: [ Previous | Next ] Pliner
Edward Pliner
WBS project currency

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:19 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
We have controlling area currency USD, company code currency USD. Is any way to follow WBS project budget in other currency? Thank's Edward
Mayank Agrawal
Re: WBS project currency

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:56 AM to: Edward Pliner in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You can specify the curreny you want to use while maintaining budget profile. Budget profile is maintained in tcode OKOB where you have the option of selecting controlling area currency/ object currency/ transaction currency. Regards, Mayank *Assign points if useful.
Edward Pliner

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:23 AM response to: Mayank Agrawal in
E-mail this message
Reply
Mayank Thank you for your answer, I have already done it but it did not help, possible there are any other settings?
Mayank Agrawal

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:43 AM response to: Edward Pliner in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Edward, I have done it several times and it works. Check the following: y If you want to plan on the basis of object currency, make sure you have selected the object currency in the budget profile.
Make sure that you assign the correct budget profile in the project master
In basic data tab of the project master, you assign the Project currency. Check the currency.
Now when you plan in tcode CJ30 you will find the currecy mentioned in the project master.
Edward Pliner

E-mail this message
Reply
I set user defined currency in budget profile and the made setting as you did. Possible reason that I set user defined currency but not object currency? Regards Edward
Back to Thread List Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Pages: 1
Thread: What are the Special Sales document types ?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
neha dhillon
What are the Special Sales document types ?

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:33 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear SAP Gurus What are the Special Sales document types ? Regards ND Re: What are the Special Sales document types ?
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:37 AM in response to: neha dhillon E-mail this message
Vivek Sahni
Reply
ND Special Sales document types are :1.SO-Rush Order. 2.G2-Credit 3.RE-Return order 4.KN 5.RK-Invoice Correction request Regards Vivek
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: change price after stand costing run

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 5 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 10:28 AM Last Post By: Mayank Agrawal
DUNBAR XUE
change price after stand costing run

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 8:29 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
After I released the stand cost of material A , and at the end of the month ,I want to change the price manually by "mr21", but the system error message"A current or future cost estimate exists" what can I do ?
nilesh joshi
Re: change price after stand costing run

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:50 AM to: DUNBAR XUE in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Dunbar You have to reorganize the costing run again by using Tcode CKR1. and then u may use MR21 for changing the price manually. May this helpful to you.Let me know if not work. Regards Nilesh
DUNBAR XUE

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:56 AM to: nilesh joshi in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Yes ,thanks for ur help, I know if I delete the stand cost with "ckr1",and I can use MR21 change price . but ,is it necessary? coz I must revaluate the value of total stock . delete std cost estimate one by one may cause heavy workloading.. many thanks
Mayank Agrawal

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:02 AM response to: DUNBAR XUE in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Just check in the material master if there is any price in the future price filed in Accounting 1/costing 2 tab.
Regards, Mayank DUNBAR XUE


E-mail this message
Reply
Mayank there is stand cost in accounting 1 and costing 2 ,current price,any suggestions?
Mayank Agrawal

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 10:28 AM in response to: DUNBAR XUE
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Your answer is not clear. If you have some value in the future price field in accounting 1 tab OR Planned price under future price in Costing 2 tab, then system will now allow you to change the cost. You need to first release the price so that it goes to current price and then change the change the price manually. Come back to me if I am missing something. Regards, Mayank
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Product cost summary by MRP Controller

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
suryanarayana b...
Product cost summary by MRP Controller

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:20 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi SAP Gurus, Do we have any report to get Product cost summary by MRP controller? Best Regards surya
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Standard Costing

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Henry Paul
Standard Costing
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 9:05 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Sap Friends, In sap standard cost calcullating every month (periodically) but my client want to change standard cost every two weeks or one week. is it possible? if i change the price every week or every two weeks what are the effects client going to be face. please let me know what are the transcation code for to change the standard cost. Also same client are going to use SAP Business All-in-one, pre configure sap program. Sap business All-in-one always keeping standard price, there is no moving average price. i beleive sap all-in-one we can 't change price are periodically but not sure. just i want to know sap business all-in-one we can change standard price by-weekly or any time as per client requirement. if we changing the stardard price in sap business all in one what are the setting i have to do..what are t-code i have to use. kindly give me advise and difference between the price update traditional implementation and sap business all in one. Regards Paul
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Dummy Profit Center
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 8:26 AM Last Post By: Manju Sagwal
EMENEM
Dummy Profit Center

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 2:56 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Can any one explain what is a dummay profit center? What is the signifiacnce of it ? When do we normally use it? Do we use it when the clinet want to combine CC and PC hierarchy ? I would appreciate your reply Gurus Gey godd points EMENEM
saurabh bagri
Re: Dummy Profit Center

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 5:45 AM to: EMENEM in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi , If PCA is active in ur client then its important to create a dummy PC so that in case of any assignment is missing from the MM or SD side the entry is posted to dummypc by the sys. Its is creted while updating the PCA hirerarchy. regards Saurabh
dinush wijesekara

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 8:22 AM to: EMENEM in response
E-mail this message
Reply
hi , adding something more to the earlier answer. The dummy profit center is updated in data transfers whenever the object to which the data was originally posted (cost center, order, and so on) is not assigned to a profit center. This ensures that the data in Profit Center Accounting is complete. You can later send the data on the dummy profit center to the other profit centers using assessment or distribution. dinush
Manju Sagwal

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 8:26 AM in response to: EMENEM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Dummy profit center: The dummy profit center is the default profit center to which data is posted when the corresponding object has not been assigned to a profit center. You can find out which objects are not assigned to profit centers by analyzing the postings assigned to the profit center. You can also assess or distribute data from the dummy profit center to the desired profit centers. Use: It may happen that some objects in your system are inadvertently left without an assignment to a profit center. In this case, postings to accounts which are defined as revenue or cost elements are assigned to the dummy profit center of the controlling area to which the object posted to belongs. This ensures that your internal and financial accounting data are reconciled. There are two places where you can create a profit center: y y In the application menu, under Master Data -> Profit Center -> Individual Processing -> Create In Customizing for Profit Center Accounting, under Master Data -> Profit Center -> Maintain Profit Centers.
I hope it will help. If helpful, please assign points. Regards, Manju

Pages: 1 Back to Thread List Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Thread: Advance payment to vendor through FBCJ

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 8:02 AM Last Post By: Samrat Roy
Samrat Roy
Advance payment to vendor through FBCJ

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:02 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, While we are paying salary/imprest/other/travel advance to Employee vendor through t/code FBCJ which has no Spl GL. This payment gets debited automatically in Employees account ( 350110). Whereas salary advance should go to GL code 320080, imprest/other advances should go to GL code 320140 and Tour advance should go to GL code 320100. Kinldy tell me if we want to pay vendor advance through FBCJ in cash where Special GL indicator option is not given in SAP, how we can pass entry through this FBCJ ?. Because in F-48 there is a option for Bank A/C GL. With Regards, Samrat
Balaji
Re: Advance payment to vendor through FBCJ

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:45 AM to: Samrat Roy in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Yah we have User Exit for it using which we can post the Down payments in cash journal. Regards Balaji
Samrat Roy
Re: Advance payment to vendor through FBCJ

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 8:02 AM to: Balaji in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,, Kindly tell me if there is an option for User Exit in cash journal, how we can
see it that user exit is available here for guiding to abaper. Beside User Exit can we pass the entry through F-02 by changing document type and posting keys. Is it possible ? Regards, Samrat
Thread: Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 14, 2008 7:48 AM Last Post By: Pankaj Agarwal
Pankaj Agarwal
Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:28 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Experts When we r doing costing then the error is displayed Cost element 58021100 is not assigned to a cost component and we have maintioned it in OKTZ , but still problem is there. Thanks & Rgds Pankaj Agarwal
Elaine Fitzsimons
Re: Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:49 AM to: Pankaj Agarwal in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hello Pankaj Sorry to ask such a simple question but is the cost component assigned in the Costing Variant the one you are checking in OKTZ? Also is there the possibility that an origin group assigned could be causing the error? When you say you have maintained it, do you subsequently run the costing again but the error still occurs? /Elaine Edited by: Elaine Fitzsimons on Jul 9, 2008 9:50 AM
Pankaj Agarwal

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 11:42 AM to: Elaine Fitzsimons in response
E-mail this message
Reply
yaa dear its still having error. rgds pankaj agarwal
Pankaj Agarwal

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:48 AM response to: Pankaj Agarwal in
E-mail this message
Reply
ok fine
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Costing run

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
supriya yelaman...
Costing run
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:21 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
As per current costing variant ZPC1 the costing run runs only for normal MMSA, not for consignment MMSA, if we want to run costing for consignment MMSA, creating normal MMSA and doing costing runBut we want to do costing run for consignment MMSA, how we can do we maintained all the steps, but it is not pikcing value from consignment MMSA value. Please advice
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Assesment To Product Cost Collector

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Fifi
Assesment To Product Cost Collector

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:18 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear All Do you know how to do assesment from cost center to Product cost Collector based on activity quantity that input by Production planning modul? Thanks
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Assesment To Product Cost Collector

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Fifi
Assesment To Product Cost Collector

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 7:18 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear All Do you know how to do assesment from cost center to Product cost
Collector based on activity quantity that input by Production planning modul? Thanks
Thread: Settlement doubt - KO88

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Threads: [ Previous | Next ] E-mail this message
Samrat Roy
Settlement doubt - KO88

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 11:25 AM
Reply
Hi,, While I run Settlement through KO88, after Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Varinace calculation and finally Settlement then I cannot find the output of Settlement i.e, What will be the exact result after running Settlement through KO88. Kindly give me urgent solution. With Regards, Samrat
yudha setiawan
Re: Settlement doubt - KO88

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 11:34 AM to: Samrat Roy in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, you can tick "check trans. data" in KO88. After settlement, you can tick detail list in report of KO88 run. The result of KO88 can be price difference or WIP. Re: Settlement doubt - KO88
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 1:41 PM to: Samrat Roy in response E-mail this message
Balaji
Reply
Hi, In period end activities Order Status should be PCNF then First Calculate the WIP using KKAX Settlement of WIP using KO88 Here the accounting entry is posted with Dr Inv WIP A/c Cr. Inv Change WIP (Consumption A/C) Process the order and confirm the process with status as TECHO, CNF, DLV Claculate the WIP using KKAX here the values are updated as Zero values. Calculate the Variances using KKS2 Now final settlement using KO88 Here the Accounting Entry is generated with Dr WIP Offset A/c (consumption) Cr. WIP Stock Adj A/c (Stock) Dr. Production Variance A/c ( Consumtion) Cr. Production Variance Offsett A/c (Consumption) Regards Balaji
Samrat Roy
Re: Settlement doubt - KO88

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 6:55 AM response to: Samrat Roy in
E-mail this message
Reply
Thanks for the answer.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: WIP calculation

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Tedi Lim
WIP calculation
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 5:21 AM
E-mail this messag e
Repl y
Dear CO Gurus, Could any of you give any input about this information messages : In period 6, I run the Mass WIP calculation the T-code is KKAO. When I review the calculation result, the WIP value is okay (as expected) but there is an information message like this : Plan cost <= actual cost. Cannot use method of apportionment (K,R) Message no. KJ228 Diagnosis This procedure apportions the results analysis data calculated in results analysis to the line IDs in proportion to the difference between the total planned costs and the actual costs. In this case, however, the actual costs are greater than or equal to the total planned costs. This means the method of apportionment cannot be used. If the <DS:DE.VERTEIL_UM>redistribution>Redistribution indicator in the Expert Mode of the valuation methods in Customizing is set to "A", the reserve portion is set to zero for the line IDs for which the difference between plan and actual is less than zero. The reserve is then only distributed to the line IDs with a positive difference between plan and actual. In this case, the apportionment is not applicable because there are no line IDs for which the
difference between plan and actual is greater than zero. The pair (K,R) means (line ID category, results analysis form). The line ID categories are: K = costs P = costs of commissions and complaints The results analysis forms are: B = work in process R = reserves for unrealized costs P = reserves for commissions and complaints Procedure When you press ENTER, the system will attempt to select another method of apportionment. The search will use the following sequence: Apportionment numbers (based on the apportionment number defined under Define Update for Results Analysis) Apportionment numbers, with apportionment numbers per line ID = 1 Only the value of the open period is distributed using the changed method. Otherwise, you can go into Customizing in the Valuation Methods for Results Analysis and choose a method of apportionment for the selected results analysis version that apportions the values differently.
Because this only an information message I just continue with the next step which the settlement T-code CO88, and in here I found that the production order that have the above information message the WIP value is not settle, the message is "No accrued amount to be settled" I don't know why is not settled. When I try to analyze the information message, it leads me to a customizing menu OKG3 which is an expert menu for Valuation method of result analysis. This customizing menu is for Product Cost by Sales Order which is for Make to Order, but what I customize in here is Make To Stock. So could any of help me, thank you very much for your help. Tedi
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Control Panel Your Reward Points
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Questions
Thread: FERT materials costed without error even if Accounting VIew is not maintain
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
acel manalo
FERT materials costed without error even if Accounting VIew is not maintain
Posted: Jul 14, 2008 4:43 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Gurus, Please help with this scenario. in our client, they were able to run cost estimate for FERT materials even if accounting view is not maintained in the material master. in my understanding, costing run should generate error report that accounting view does not exist. Please advice. Thanks!
Pages: 1
Thread: Cosxt center and profit center hierarchy

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
EMENEM
Cosxt center and profit center hierarchy

Posted: Jul 14, 2008 2:54 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Gurus, I am new in this field.and require guidance. I have a client from financial services and has asked me to create CC and PC hierarchy. He wants 2 hierachies with alternatetive heirarchy. Tjey have parent company 1 Four subsidiaries that makes it 5o company codes Each company code has 4 divisions ( line of business) They roll up from lower level to the top level that is line of business.Lowerlevel is Branch ( channel)>District>Region> Business unit(m products)> Line of business. Thie is present hierarchy. In the new hierarchy he wants to comebine the PCA and CCA Hierarchies as one and add more channels besides Branch he wants internet, Telebanking etc.with a Dummy Profit center. Can any one give me a suggestion how to create it or any expert has created it then can you forward it? Pleae i need it ASAP and you get high reward points EMENEM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Creating a Library in Report Writer for FI-SL

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Adela Cambiasso
Creating a Library in Report Writer for FI-SL

Posted: Jul 13, 2008 6:53 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hello everybody, When creating a library (table ZZGLTRS) for Report Writer for FI-SL I have the following message: "Table ZZGLTRS is not installed in Report Writer" and the description of the message says: "The Report Writer can only report on tables if the attributes of these tables that are relevant for reporting are defined in control tables. This is not the case for table ZZGLTRS" Does anybody knows what does this "control tables" mean? Should I activate this ZZGLTRS table somewhere to be used in report Writer? Thanks in advance!!! Adela.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Collective processing error when order revaluation when month end
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Qing LI
Collective processing error when order revaluation when month end

Posted: Jul 13, 2008 6:20 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, When we used two SAP IDs to have revaluation simultaneously on two plants respectively message KI 761 is displayed: "Revaluation is locked by user ...". I got the corresponding SAP notes 207292 and followed it, specified selection criteria more precisely, but didn't work. So please kindly guide me and your any information will be appreciated.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: IO error - REconstruction required?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 7:43 PM Last Post By: Meghan Carew
Meghan Carew
IO error - REconstruction required?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 8:07 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Is there a reconstruct program for Internal orders? In KOB2 I have an internal order that is not being updated. There are two lines in the report, one shoing the actual and one showing the commitment. The report should only show 1 line with the residual commitment amount. Any advice would be apprecaited! Thanks in advance! Edited by: Meghan Carew on Jul 11, 2008 8:48 PM
Sreenivas Kadiam
Posts: 831 Registered: 8/4/06 Forum Points: 1,868
Re: IO error - REconstruction required?

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 11:13 AM response to: Meghan Carew in
E-mail this message
Reply
Use T Code SE38 and execute the program RKANBU01 mentioning the IO which assigned in PR/PO. Regards Sreenivas
Meghan Carew
Re: IO error - REconstruction required?

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 7:43 PM to: Sreenivas Kadiam in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Thanks Sreemivas, this is exactly what i was looking for.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: cost centre

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
shankar chitupolu
cost centre
Posted: Jul 12, 2008 6:29 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
there are so many cost centres in one company code. i want to know the real scenario. can any one tell me the actual thing. i.e. how many cost centres used in one company code. give examples. and what are the remaining cost centres at the end of the fiscal year. iam in confusion. why because while doing product cost planning we are taking the overheads from the cost centres, at the same time how the system takes the actual values.please help me.
Pages: 1
Thread: Cost Components

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 6:09 PM Last Post By: Jigar Thakkar
s sq
Cost Components
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:29 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
HI All, What are the cost components for the WIP process. I understand this is been defined in the Overhead key for the Materials in the Production order. I would like to know the Cost components which are added as the factors of production in the WIP Process. I can see the cost components in the Costing sheet as a calculation procedure. Is there any separate transaction code/node/report which gives me the components for the overhead calculation. Ex: for material X overhead costs may be: Admin Oh Sell OH Labour OH etc., This is required for the auditing purpose as certain overheads like Sell and Admin OH are not be added as the Cost of production in WIP as per accounting standards. So we need to show exactly what components are adding to the production cost. Pls help me in this regard, Thanks and regards, S Sq Edited by: s sq on Jul 12, 2008 12:34 PM
Jigar Thakkar
Re: Cost Components

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 6:09 PM response to: s sq in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Friend, Please go to OKTZ - Define Cost Component Strcuture. I hope it will be helpful to you. Regards, Jigar
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: cost of goods sold report

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 12:04 PM Last Post By: Ijaz Hussain Bu...
fico sap
cost of goods sold report

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 5:17 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all, Is there any standard report for Cost of goods sold by production order?Please let me know how to see cogs report by production order. Let me know how to calculate this cogs . Thanks, Sai. Edited by: fico sap on Jul 11, 2008 1:42 PM
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

Re: cost of goods sold report

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 12:04 PM in response to: fico sap
E-mail this message
Reply
Friend Order shows material cost & activity cost ; you can charge over head as well Means; Total order cost = Material cost+Activty Cost+FOH
You can check order wise planned vs actual cost KOC4 if useful assign points. bukhari
Thread: finished goods inventory

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 11:57 AM Last Post By: Ijaz Hussain Bu...
jay jay
finished goods inventory

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 12:21 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
hi experts, I got a problem regarding finished goods inventory. I used mb51 t.code and got closing stock value with closing quantity. but the value is not matching with finished goods G/L account. why it is not matching? and in mb51 t.code i used finished goods store and got the finished materials closing stock and qty. after that i have taken those materials whatever i got in mb51 and posted in mb5b. then i got the finished goods value with qty. qty is matching but value is not matching. why it is not matching with mb51 and mb5b. please reply me. urgent. thanks & reagards
jay Jigar Thakkar

Re: finished goods inventory

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:23 PM response to: jay jay in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Friend, As you will be maintaining the finished goods inventory on Standard Price. GL account will be hitting by relavant price by relevant quantity. So the point is, you will running the stadard cost estimate for that product and finished stock will be calculated by standard price. so your quantity will be matching but stock value will differ from material master and GL Account. Regards, Jigar
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

Re: finished goods inventory

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 11:57 AM response to: Jigar Thakkar in
E-mail this message
Reply
yes jigar is right bukhari
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: WIP
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
kaipa narasimha
WIP
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:51 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
At presently i m using the scenario of product cost by order while trying to post the WIP my system is not allowing me to post because of non assignment of line id's but actually i had assigned the line id's .. can any body help me in solving the problem i will award you full points if i can solve it.. Re: WIP
Posted: Jul 12, 2008 11:54 AM in response to: kaipa narasimha E-mail this message Reply
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

Friend Have you maintained posting rule in WIP (OKG8) bukhari
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: WIP
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

WIP
Posted: Jul 12, 2008 11:43 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi System calculating correctly production order wise WIP. My client require ; Stage wise Qty & Value of each production orders in WIP. Have you any solution. thanks bukhari
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Can i assign budget to stock a/c at time

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Inderjit Singh
Can i assign budget to stock a/c at time

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 10:16 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Can i assign budget to stock a/c at time. Regards Inderjit Singh
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: cost element-BDC

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 9:14 AM Last Post By: N.M.B
N.M.B
cost element-BDC
Posted: Jul 12, 2008 6:57 AM
Reply
Hello Gurus, Can anyone please give some idea to prepare functional spec. for cost element for BDC. Thanks in advance N.M.B
N.M.B
Re: cost element-BDC

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 7:47 AM response to: N.M.B in
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear friends, i need it very urgent
sarma tadikonda

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 8:43 AM response to: N.M.B in
E-mail this message
Reply
Why you need a BDC for cost element creation? You can do it by usign LSMW very few feilds and not a complex one. ALternatively you can create Cost elements by using OKB2 and OKB3 and then SM35. Its a pure excel format. Try considering this option than BDC.
N.M.B

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 9:14 AM in response to: sarma tadikonda
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Sharma, Thanks for your reply. But how can we create master data through BDC. How can we give functional specification for that Pls clarify my doubt N.M.B
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Product costing operation

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Samrat Roy
Product costing operation

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 6:29 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,, Kindly guide me how Overhead calculation, Variance Analysis, Settlement and Assement operaions are done ? What is the actual function of individual operaion ? What will be journal entries for each of the operaion ? Before run product costing operation through CK40n is these steps are necessary ? Kindly guide me clearly by describing step by step functions. With regards, Samrat
rau moder
Re: Product costing operation

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 7:44 PM to: Samrat Roy in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Samrat, WIP The WIP calculation process valuates the unfinished products (work in process). In the Product Cost by Order component, the work in process is valuated at actual costs. Work in process is the difference between the debit and credit of an order that has not been completely delivered. This method determines the work in process for each production order by calculating the difference between the actual costs incurred and the actual costs settled (that is, the difference between the debits for goods issues, internal activity allocations, external activities, and overhead on the one hand, and the credits for goods receipts on the other). Once the last part of the order lot has been delivered to stock, any remaining work in process must be canceled so that the order costs can properly be settled to stock. The status of the order determines whether WIP calculation creates or cancels the work in process. If the order has the status REL (released), the system can calculate work in process. Once the order receives the status DLV (Delivered) or TECO (Technically completed), the work in process calculated in a previous period is canceled. Variances The system compares the control costs with the target costs and assigns the variances to variance categories. The variances are assigned to variance categories in the following sequence: Input price variance
Resource-usage variance Input quantity variance Remaining input variance Mixed-price variance Output price variance Lot size variance Remaining variance Variance = 0 if only partial Goods Receipts has been performed. Variance = amount if only complete Goods Receipts has been performed. Settlement During the Production process, process orders are debited with actual costs. Each time goods are received into inventory, the system valuates the receipt and credits the process order accordingly. The actual costs posted to an order can be more or less than the value with which order was credited when the goods receipt was posted. When you settle the process order, this difference between the debit and credit of the process order is transferred to Finance and other components. The following can happen during the Settlement Process. The order balance can be reduced to zero by transferring to Financial Accounting the difference between the preliminary inventory valuation(goods receipt) and the actual costs incurred. The total variance can be transferred to profitability segments in Profitability Analysis(COPA) This enables to get the additional contribution margin. Overhead Use overhead calculation to allocate overhead through percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rates. The basis for the allocation is the primary cost elements that you posted as overhead costs. In the manufacturing industry, for example, these are usually the labor and material costs. To perform an overhead costing, you need to define control data during Customizing and include this in a Costing Sheet. The Costing Sheet combines all parts of the overhead costing and determines the rules for calculating the values to be posted. The Costing Sheet is comprised of a Calculation Base, Overhead Rate, and Credits. Assessments Assessment is a method of internal cost allocation by which you allocate (transfer) costs from a sender cost center to receiver CO objects (orders, other cost centers, and so on) using a secondary assessment- cost element.
If this is useful,please assign points. Thanks, Rau Samrat Roy Re: Product costing operation
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 12:37 PM in response E-mail this Reply
to: rau moder Posts: 70 Registered: 12/15/07 Forum Points: 0
message
Hi,, Kindly tell me which step should be first here. Mention the steps serially. with regards, Samrat
rau moder

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 3:16 PM to: Samrat Roy in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Samrat, 1.Overhead calculation 2.WIP 3.Variance calculation 4.Settlement 5.Assessment If this is usefull,assign points. Thanks, Rau
Samrat Roy

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 8:16 AM to: rau moder in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi. You have mentioned the steps serially. Kindly tell me before " COSTING RUN" through CK40n or CK11n what will be actual sequences of COSTING RUN operation ? ie, 1.Overhead calculation 2.WIP 3.Variance calculation 4.Settlement 5.Assessment Then start "Costing Run" or start Costing run first and above mentioned sequence will be later operation or "Costing Run" operation will be after Settlement operation(4) i.e before Assessment operation(5). Kindly tell me as early as possible
With Regards, Samrat Edited by: Samrat Roy on Jul 12, 2008 8:18 AM
Thread: Account Group : for Profit Center List Orient Report

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

Account Group : for Profit Center List Orient Report

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 12:02 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Sapians I've created account groups as follows: 1>P& L 2>Sales 3>Raw Mat 1 4>Raw Mat 2 System shows profit on top. My client need following : a) P&L at end of report b) Total of node 3 & 4 thanks bukhari
Madhav Nanduri
Posts: 126 Registered: 3/2/07
Re: Account Group : for Profit Center List Orient Report

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 4:20 PM to: Ijaz Hussain Bu... in response
E-mail this message
Reply
I am not sure if you are using Report Painter to develop the report, but if
Forum Points: 214
yes, then in the report definition, if you go to Formatting - Report Layout and click on the tab Rows, you have option to display the totals either at the top or at the bottom of the account groups. Thanks Madhav Nanduri
Ijaz Hussain Bu...

Re: Account Group : for Profit Center List Orient Report

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 6:27 AM to: Madhav Nanduri in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, I am just using profit center list oriented reports so that i was created account group. I again try and make groups as follows and result is OK. Sub-Sub-Group Sub Group Main group.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: New Business Transactions in Controlling

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2008 12:00 AM Last Post By: Deloitte Chile
Deloitte Chile
New Business Transactions in Controlling

E-mail this message
Reply
Dear SDN Members I am in transaction KANK assign the business transaction into number range group, but I found new element, these ones are: GPDP Distribution Primary Costs JRPU JRPV KTDA COPA: TOP-DOWN: Actuals PNV1 PRC: Activity Backflush That anyone know theses?? And where can I assign these My groups are: Primary postings Planning Transactions Assessment, Distribution, Order Settlement (Internal) Primary Postings I copied it from controlling area 0001 Thanks Ariel Edited by: Deloitte Chile on Jul 7, 2008 5:33 PM
Eli Klovski
Re: New Business Transactions in Controlling

Posted: Jul 7, 2008 5:37 PM to: Deloitte Chile in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You do not have to assign all business transactions available in KANK to the number ranges. Only the ones, you know you will use in your system. Some of them are actually results from the components, you might never use in your project. For example, GPDP transaction refers to IS component. Regards, Eli
Deloitte Chile

Posted: Jul 7, 2008 5:47 PM to: Deloitte Chile in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Eli
Forum Points: 0
Thanks for your answer, its my first time that i see these element, for that reason i want to be sure if is really necesarry to include its into a group Do you know where can I find the meaning of these? Ariel Eli Klovski

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 9:39 AM to: Deloitte Chile in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Ariel, You can look through OSS, and 'hunt it down' there. Though, as I said, I wouldn't bother myself with this. There are about 200 business transactions and only 10% of them is usually used in one project. Regards, Eli
Deloitte Chile

Posted: Jul 12, 2008 12:00 AM response to: Eli Klovski in
E-mail this message
Reply
Ok Eli Anyway thanks for your help Kind Regards Ariel
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Planning config in cost center accounting
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
bobba gokul
Planning config in cost center accounting

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 7:52 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear All, Can some one share me with configuration of Planning in cost center accounting. Thanks and Regards, Gokul.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: CO-PA
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
sam rao
CO-PA
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 5:41 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
hi all can body help me please Types KE24 VBRP Diff, OS 730400 -30450 699950 OG 3300 -1500 1800 RK 329846 -1031596 -701750 Grand Total 1063546 -1063546 0 give me the reason for the differance of the both the KE24 report and VBRP table data any devlopment side settings needed for this plaese give me the advice ASAP thanks rao
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Does anyone know about WOTC?

This thread is locked - replies are not allowed.
Search Forum
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 5:23 PM Last Post By: Karl Helm
miceal tim
Does anyone know about WOTC?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 7:34 AM
E-mail this message
Hi Folks, I am a businessman I want to go for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit! Does anyone know the procedure of it, so that I can enjoy its benefit? If you people have any knowledge regarding this, please let me know. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks for any help! Re: Does anyone know about WOTC?
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 5:22 PM to: miceal tim in response E-mail this message
Karl Helm
Hi,
sorry, but this is not the forum for such questions. Therefore I'm locking this thread.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Vendor Spend Report

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 5:00 PM Last Post By: Prakash
Prakash
Vendor Spend Report

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 4:49 PM
Reply
Hello All Is anyone aware of any report which will give me a vendor spend analysis including invoice numbers and cost centres? Thanks in advance
Prakash
Re: Vendor Spend Report

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 5:00 PM in response to: Prakash
E-mail this message
Reply
Sorry wrong forum
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: This is not the logical system of controlling area 2000

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 4:59 PM Last Post By: Karl Helm
Varsha
This is not the logical system of controlling area 2000

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 6:50 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, While creating Activity type / price planning in kp26....i am getting the the information like... "This is not the logical system of controlling area 2000".. but i am using the company code 3000 which is assigned to the controlling area 2000.... so...kindly tell me how to come out of this.... Thanks in advance..
Madhav Nanduri
Re: This is not the logical system of controlling area 2000

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 4:10 PM response to: Varsha in
E-mail this message
Reply
What is the error message number you are getting? Thanks Madhav Nanduri
Karl Helm
Re: This is not the logical system of controlling area 2000

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 4:59 PM response to: Varsha in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,
I assume the error is either KC028 or COCORE081. In any case: please check if you have activated an ALE scenario for the relevant controlling area in TA OKKP1. Then check if the logical system differs from the system defined for you client in TA SCC4. If this is the case, then that is the reason for the error. Regards Karl
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Profit Center Default at Delivery

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 6 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 4:40 PM Last Post By: Rukshana Sameem
Rukshana Sameem
Profit Center Default at Delivery

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 11:07 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi All i am stuck on an issue where the req is that for a freight condition which is determined on the Delivery Document, there should be a default PC however i tried doing a default PC assignment under 'Assign GL acct to Default PC' but even after this, it picks the material master PC is there any way i can fulfil this req... Thank u all Rukshana
Anil Kumar Ramp...

Re: Profit Center Default at Delivery

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 8:00 AM in response to: Rukshana Sameem
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Try tcode 3keh regards Anil
Vivek Sahni

E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Friend As per my opinion, the relevant solution in this case would be using -
Transaction Code 3KEH Reward points,if found useful. Regards Vivek Sahni Rukshana Sameem

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 3:18 PM response to: Vivek Sahni in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi there thank u very much for the reply - however, even after i define the derivation rule in 3KEH, the freight condition defaults to the Material master Profit Center Any other suggestions would be very helpful Rukshana
Daniela Kallenb...

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 4:16 PM in response to: Rukshana Sameem
E-mail this message
Reply
Hello, til posting goods issue to the external customer ALWAYS the material profit center is taken. This is the SAP Standard. This ensures that the postings will be consistent. Cheers, Daniela
Rukshana Sameem

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 4:35 PM in response to: Daniela Kallenb...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi there thanks for the info, but i want to overwrite this i already did that using user exit at the order level, however, now i want a further overwrite at the Delivery Document for the freight condition, where i want the freight to hit another Service Cost Center. Any Suggestions?? Rukshana
Rukshana Sameem

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all i am still in the process of looking to overwrite the PC on the Delivery Document and i still havent found a solution.. i think the reason is that the the freight Condition (which i want to overwrite) is on the Line Item details and the PC (which gets copied from the material master) is on the header detail.
What can i do to rectify this - i have tried, 3KEH and Substitution, but both arent working... is there a User Exit i can implement for this, and even if i do, whats the condition criteria i can specify on the user exit.. any help wil be greatly appreciated thank u very much Rukshana
Thread: Profit Center Default at Delivery

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 6 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 4:40 PM Last Post By: Rukshana Sameem
Rukshana Sameem
Profit Center Default at Delivery

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 11:07 PM
Reply
Hi All i am stuck on an issue where the req is that for a freight condition which is determined on the Delivery Document, there should be a default PC however i tried doing a default PC assignment under 'Assign GL acct to Default PC' but even after this, it picks the material master PC is there any way i can fulfil this req... Thank u all Rukshana
Anil Kumar Ramp...


E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Try tcode 3keh regards Anil
Vivek Sahni

E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Friend As per my opinion, the relevant solution in this case would be using Transaction Code 3KEH Reward points,if found useful. Regards Vivek Sahni
Rukshana Sameem

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 3:18 PM response to: Vivek Sahni in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi there thank u very much for the reply - however, even after i define the derivation rule in 3KEH, the freight condition defaults to the Material master Profit Center Any other suggestions would be very helpful Rukshana
Daniela Kallenb...

E-mail this message
Reply
Hello, til posting goods issue to the external customer ALWAYS the material profit center is taken. This is the SAP Standard. This ensures that the postings will be consistent. Cheers, Daniela
Rukshana Sameem

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 4:35 PM in response to: Daniela Kallenb...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi there
Forum Points: 26
thanks for the info, but i want to overwrite this i already did that using user exit at the order level, however, now i want a further overwrite at the Delivery Document for the freight condition, where i want the freight to hit another Service Cost Center. Any Suggestions?? Rukshana
Rukshana Sameem

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all i am still in the process of looking to overwrite the PC on the Delivery Document and i still havent found a solution.. i think the reason is that the the freight Condition (which i want to overwrite) is on the Line Item details and the PC (which gets copied from the material master) is on the header detail. What can i do to rectify this - i have tried, 3KEH and Substitution, but both arent working... is there a User Exit i can implement for this, and even if i do, whats the condition criteria i can specify on the user exit.. any help wil be greatly appreciated thank u very much Rukshana
Pages: 1
Thread: Error Message in executing MRRL (ERS) transaction.

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 4:00 PM Last Post By: Madhav Nanduri
Sudhakar Taduvai
Error Message in executing MRRL (ERS) transaction.

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 8:13 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, I am working in 4.7 EE version and I configured the Evaluated Receipt Settlement process. While executing tcode MRRRL the system is giving the following error: *Message No. M8446 ERS settlement: No message was found for partner 103948/company code 1000* Please help me to solve this issue. Regards Sudhakar Edited by: Sudhakar Taduvai on Jul 11, 2008 10:44 AM
Madhav Nanduri
Re: Error Message in executing MRRL (ERS) transaction.

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 3:58 PM in response to: Sudhakar Taduvai
E-mail this message
Reply
Have you configured the messaging in T.Code M806? Thanks. Please ensure that you have maintained all the partner functions in this t.code. Edited by: Madhav Nanduri on Jul 11, 2008 3:59 PM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Cost center tables

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 3:08 PM Last Post By: SAPADDICTED
*SAPWORLDMR* SA...
Cost center tables

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:42 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, what are cost centers tables ? I'm looking for the user responsible of a cost center and I want to find his/her username Best regards
SAPADDICTED
Re: Cost center tables

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 3:08 PM in response to: *SAPWORLDMR* SA...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, look at CSKS table. Regards
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: How we can automatically create COST ELEMENTS ?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 2:41 PM Last Post By: Vivek Sahni
neha dhillon
How we can automatically create COST ELEMENTS ?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:01 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Dear Gurus How we can automatically create COST ELEMENTS ? Nd
Jigar Thakkar
Re: How we can automatically create COST ELEMENTS ?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:17 PM response to: neha dhillon in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Friend, Go to OKB2 and enter the GL Account number to be created as a cost element automatically and give the relevant cost element category. I hope this will find useful to you. Regards, Jigar
Jigar Thakkar

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You can also execute the batch input session by giving validity period. T Code is OKB3. Regards, Jigar
Vivek Sahni

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi neha You will be able to create automatically Cost elements by specifying :1.Cost Element 2.Cost Element Interval 3.Cost Element Category for the Cost Elements Reards Vivek
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: how to assign default cost center to exchange differences ?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 2:21 PM Last Post By: Eric Cartman
Chundi Venkata ...

how to assign default cost center to exchange differences ?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 12:38 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all, Default costcentre for currency exchange differences missing in the
Forum Points: 0
company code. How to assign ? Please answer at the earliest. regards narasimha rao Re: how to assign default cost center to exchange differences ?
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 2:21 PM in response to: Chundi Venkata ... E-mail this message Reply
Eric Cartman
Posts: 3,151 Registered: 8/22/07 Forum Points: 6,244
hi, to the G/L account/cost element you have to link a cost center. This can be done in OKB9. hope my answer is early enough... :) hope this helps ec
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Blocking Cost Centers and Profit Centers at a Mass level

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 5 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 1:12 PM Last Post By: Daniela Kallenb...
Lakshman
Blocking Cost Centers and Profit
E-mail
Reply
Sai Ve...
Centers at a Mass level

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 6:04 AM
this message
Dear SAP Friends, My Client was earlier using 4 company codes.Now all 4 comapny codes have been consolidated into a Single company code Brief description of the Issue: The Client wants to block posting to several Cost Centers and Profit Centers (around 1000) belonging to closed/consolidated company codes. Could anyone please help in addressing the Issue i.e. how to block postings to cost centers and profit centers at a mass level. Thanks a lot Sai Venkat
Anil Kumar Ramp...

Re: Blocking Cost Centers and Profit Centers at a Mass level

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 7:38 AM to: Lakshman Sai Ve... in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You can control posting to this cost & profit centres with Roles & Authorization, I you have done Revamp consolidation 4 ccode to one, son whenever you created user in new co code give authorization for profit centres & cost centre of new company code only Re: Blocking Cost Centers and Profit Centers at a Mass level
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 11:29 AM in response to: Lakshman Sai Ve... E-mail this message Reply
Daniela Kallenb...
Hi, you can use trx. KE56 to remove the company code assignment from the profit center for all closed/consolidated company codes. Cheers, Daniela
Lakshman Sai Ve...


Posted: Jul 9, 2008 6:04 PM to: Anil Kumar Ramp... in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Anil, I am sorry but to clarify further, the consolidation was rather in the nature of merger wherein out of 4 existing company codes, 3 company codes were merged with the 4th company code. So all the 4 company codes have the same set of cost centers and profit centers. As you have advised to restrict the access via Role authorization, all the users have access to same set of cost centers and profit centers in the old 3 company codes and also the 4th company code into which all the other 3 company codes were merged.
Please let me know in case you any other clarifications. Thanks Sai venkat Lakshman Sai Ve...

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 6:07 PM to: Daniela Kallenb... in response
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Daniela, I tried to use T-code KE56 but getting an error message that "Cost center 000XXXXX is assigned to profit center 000XXXXX. Process terminated" Could you help me to proceed further. Thanks Sai Venkat
Daniela Kallenb...

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 1:12 PM in response to: Lakshman Sai Ve...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, ok.. you have first to clear the connections between the account assignments and the profit center. You can check with trx. 1KEF which profit center is assigned to which cost centers/materials etc. Here you have to remove the profit center in the respective company codes. Afterwards you can deselect the company codes with trx. KE56. Cheers, Daniela
Thread: Creation of Operating Concern after Controlling Area

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 12:56 PM Last Post By: Balaji
Sangeeta
Creation of Operating Concern after Controlling Area

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 11:29 AM
Reply
Hi SAP Gurus, Need your help on this one: Our client is implementing FICO in phase 1 without COPA & Product Costing. COPA will be taken up in Phase 2 when MM & SD are also implemented. Will I have to create an Operating Concern now in Phase 1 along with the Controlling Area? or will I be able to create an Opearting Concern alone later in Phase 2? Points will be assigned to useful answers. Thanks & Regards, Sangeeta
Balaji
Re: Creation of Operating Concern after Controlling Area

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 12:56 PM in response to: Sangeeta
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Its not necessary to create in the first phase you can create it at any time. Now you can create Controlling Area with out COPA late when all the modules have completed the configuration then you can create Operating Concern. Bcz you need to know the Characteristics and Values fileds which have to flow into COPA. You need to Know the SD Condition Types for revenue Value
fileds. And also Cost Component Structure with COsting Key for MM value Fields. So its better to have Operating concern after config and testing of all the modules. Regards Balaji
Thread: Status field in CKMLPP tale

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Vaskar Banerjee
Status field in CKMLPP tale

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 11:43 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
HI all, What does the STATUS field in CKMLPP table suggest. How the Material selection for ML run is affected by the change of this field value. Regards, Vaskar
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Result analysis - are reserves for imminent losses with COSR?
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Yuka
Result analysis - are reserves for imminent losses with COSR?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 10:21 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, I'm trying to customising result analysis and would like to calculate reserves for imminent losses. In case the reserves for imminent losses are realized, WIP are mandatorily canceled and apportioned as Cost of Sales.In table COSB ABKAT(WIPR) are cancelled and ABKAT(COSR) are realized. However It's unexpected behavier. I'd like to calculate imminent losses with WIP,not with Cost of Sale. Is it possible? Please help me. Regards, Yuka
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Urgent Help in Standard Costing

Search Forum
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 10:04 AM Last Post By: Henry Paul
Henry Paul
Urgent Help in Standard Costing

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:03 AM
E-mail this message
Dear sap friends Company want to use standard costing in sap, however they are changing their standard costs sometimes in the middle of the month and various times per month. The discussion is around what the best practice should be and to understand why theya re changing these so frequently. Accordingly we will need to find a soultion for them and/ or they need to be educated and use standard costing as it should be. Kindly give me your advise about the standard price changing every time in the best practise. what i suppose to give them feed back and what is the best soultion i can provide the client. Regards, Henry Moderator: Please observe the forum rules. This is the second thread of yours we have to lock due to an inappropriate thread title - please DO NOT use the word "urgent" in the title. Edited by: Karl Helm on Jul 11, 2008 9:58 AM
Sateesh Kumar V...

Re: Urgent Help in Standard Costing

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:21 AM Paul in response to: Henry
E-mail this message
Hi Henry, Due to several factors price fluctuation occurs in company. Due to transportation prices hike, oil price hike, labor hike, raw material price hike etc, it will effect to your material. Thats why the management is thinking the change of price regularly.' Best practise is to run the standard cost estimate at month end.Irregular price changes will occur price differece and mangement loose the confidence of customer also. sateesh
Henry Paul
Re: Urgent Help in Standard Costing

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:54 AM Sateesh Kumar V... in response to:
E-mail this message
Hi Satesh, As per your email we can change the standard price only period end. if customer wants to change middle of month or weekly what i suppose to be do.. what advice i can give to the client. also can you explain to me about standard price, and document price. i got a note standard price and document price difference will go to variance. please explain standard price and documnet price. When they are calcuallating vairance. Regards Paul
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Control Panel
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Reward Points Your Questions
Thread: Product Costing Scenarios - with End User Documents

Search Forum
Back to Thread List
SAPGURU
Product Costing Scenarios - with End User Documents

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:41 AM
Hi, I am working on Product costing.Kindly send me the scenarios what will be involved with respective to Manufacturing client.and i need to prepare the End User Guides.Kindly send them to E-mail address removed y o please give me clear picture of product costing(flow-what is the process flow if we use product costing)
Thanks Sap Guru Moderator: please observe the forum rules - thread locked Edited by: Karl Helm on Jul 11, 2008 9:56 AM
Thread: Settlement profile

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 9:46 AM Last Post By: ravi prasad
ravi prasad
Settlement profile
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 4:24 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi All, Can we use same settlement profile in Both internal order and Production order Its urgent, Points will be awarded Thanx Ravi
Madhav Nanduri
Re: Settlement profile

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:48 PM response to: ravi prasad in
E-mail this message
Reply
You can use the same settlement profile, but it does not make sense to use the same one. The reason being, in the production order, you will be settling the variances and you may want to book the entry to P&L Accounts, whereas your internal orders can either be settled to P&L Accounts (if its an expense related order) or to Assets in case of Capital Orders. Depending on your requirement, you can use the settlement profile, if the settlement parameters are the same. Thanks, Madhav Nanduri
Sridhar Vasudevan

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:50 PM response to: ravi prasad in
E-mail this message
Reply
Technically yes, but suggest using separate profiles!
ravi prasad

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:44 AM response to: Madhav Nanduri in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Madhav, Thanx for the reply . can you help in the issue product cost by sales order also? Please reply on that Regs ravi
ravi prasad

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 9:46 AM response to: ravi prasad in
E-mail this message
Reply
HI vasudevan, Thanx for the reply . Please try answering my question product cost by sales order . I dont have any idea on that could yoy please brief me on that , i mean the steps. Thanx in advance ravi
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Material ledger single level run error

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 6 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 8:17 AM Last Post By: Vaskar Banerjee
Vaskar Banerjee
Material ledger single level run error

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi All, During last month ML run, we faced a problem. For some of the Material of certain Material Type even Single level run could not be done. On analysis we found that for these materials previous periods ML run was not done. We are not sure why in previous months system did not select these materials for ML. Because in the Change data for Material master there is nothing of that sort which discriminate those materials in the earlier periods but picked the same in the last period. Now we have closed last month ML with errors for those materials, but we cannot let this continue for future months. Can any one tell me how to exclude those materials in future runs, because those materials are not to be used for any movement in future and the stock balance has already been made to zero. And give the probable cause, or where can we find the reason why those materials got picked last month ML run but not in periods prior to that. Regards, Vaskar
Karl Helm
Re: Material ledger single level run error

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:29 AM response to: Vaskar Banerjee in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Vaskar,
if you want to discard certain materials from the closing process I would suggest setting the ML status of the relevant materials to 70 (closing entry completed). This can be done by implementing the MLHELPDESK (see SAP note 364368) and then running MLHELP_SET_PP_STATUS_70 (this is the only MLHELPDESK report that is released for customer use). But you will have to check for possible revaluation amounts (see SAP note 645083). The reason is that you probably had movements in the relevant periods (GI/GR/IR etc.), i.e CKMLPP-STATUS is 30 or higher. Regards Karl
Vaskar Banerjee

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:52 AM response to: Karl Helm in
E-mail this message
Reply
Thanx Karl, Firstly this is to inform you that for most of those materials there has not been any movements for past few months and not even in the last month. So I am not able to understand what change has triggered system to select those materials in the last month but left out in prior periods. Secondly I am not able to understand the MLHELP_SET_PP_STATUS_70 thing. I have never used it and I am not sure whether we have it installed or not. Is it an add-on to standard SAP? Please tell me how can we run that report. Or if not installed, is there any other way by which we can change the status of the Material to 70. Thanks Vaskar
Vaskar Banerjee

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 1:12 PM response to: Karl Helm in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Karl, Thanks for your reply. It helped me to change the status of the materials. But still I have a doubt whether any other material may be picked up in the next month or not. So if you can give an idea of exactly what is responsible for the system to behave like that. What are the criteria for materials to get selected for ML run. regards, Vaskar
Karl Helm

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 1:38 PM response to: Vaskar Banerjee in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,
glad to hear that. In regard to the cause please check the following: y y SE16 MBEW table for one of the affected materials/valuation area. Take note of the KALN1 number SE16 CKMLPP table -> enter the MBEW-KALN1 number in the KALNR and select one of the previous periods (POPER field). Now check the entry in the STATUS field and come back to me with the info.
Regards
Karl Vaskar Banerjee


Posted: Jul 9, 2008 2:51 PM response to: Karl Helm in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Karl, I have checked the status value. It is 20 in one of the prior periods in which it was not picked by the system and remains same for the last period still it got picked. regards, Vaskar
Vaskar Banerjee

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 8:17 AM response to: Karl Helm in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Karl, As per your advice I have verified the status. It remains same as 20 for last few months. Though with the same status the system did not pick those materials in prior months but in the last month it picked. Regards, Vaskar
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Which TCODE to view CE4xxxx_ACCT data?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 6:40 AM Last Post By: Jigar Thakkar
Kevin Chan
Which TCODE to view CE4xxxx_ACCT data?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 4:24 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi everyone, My company is using cost-based COPA. I found that there're two very big tables stores the COPA data, CE1xxxx and CE4xxxx_ACCT. I use TCODE KE24, which can extract the data from CE1xxxx table for form report. But how about CE4xxxx_ACCT table? What's the usage of this table? Any TCODE can retrieve data from it and form report? Thanks a lot, Kevin
Jigar Thakkar
Re: Which TCODE to view CE4xxxx_ACCT data?

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 6:40 AM response to: Kevin Chan in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, The system created following structures in COsting Based COPA 1. CE1XXXX (Where XXXX is operating concent code) - Actual Line item table 2. CE2XXXX - Plan line item table 3. CE3XXXX - Summery Record by profitablity Segment 4. CE4XXXX - Profitability Segment Definition Now to see the strcutures, Go to KEA0, Now in data Structure Tab Page Click on DISPLAY.Now you will see the Data Structure CE1XXXX. So now double click on it. You will be able to see the fields of CE1XXXX. If you want to Change the Table, Press SHIFT + F5. Enter the database table CE4XXXX. You will see the fields for that database structure. I hope you understood and found useful Regards, Jigar
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: pm order settlement error " substitution not active in controlling area"
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 11, 2008 5:43 AM Last Post By: Ediga Shrihari
Ediga Shrihari
pm order settlement error " substitution not active in controlling area"

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 5:17 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
hi fico experts, I am facing problem while doing settlement (ko88) of pm order, the error is "substitution" is not active in controlling area" but I was able to do settlement (ko88) of cs order in same client without any error. have checked up the pm settlement rule for both orders, and found okay. pl help in giving solution to overcome the above error. thanks in advance Srihari PS: The above is error is coming in same client, while doing testing scenerio (after updating of patch level from 14 to 19 in client)
Jigar Thakkar
Re: pm order settlement error " substitution not active in controlling area"
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:28 AM response to: Ediga Shrihari in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Which error message you are getting? Can you eloborate your error in descriptive manner? Regards, Jigar
Sai Krishna Val...

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:09 AM response to: Ediga Shrihari in
E-mail this message
Reply
If you receive error K5 110, apply the note 1161685 dt. 17.04.2008 assign points
Ediga Shrihari
Posted: Jul 11, 2008 5:43 AM in response to: Sai Krishna Val...
E-mail this message
Reply
hi after applying note, problem solved, note is from patch 20 level thanx so much regards Srihari
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Welcome, Udit Sheth
Thread: About the PCA

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
zhao gang
About the PCA

Posted: Jul 11, 2008 3:56 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all: can anyone here please tell me what's the difference when i use the PCA(profit center accounting) or not in the CO moudle? especially the difference in the daily work when i operate the sap system.for example the goods movement in the MM , when post the documents and so on. Thanks&Best regards! Edited by: zhao gang on Jul 11, 2008 9:57 AM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Summarization levels rebuilding
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 3 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 11:20 PM Last Post By: Niki Shah
Niki Shah
Summarization levels rebuilding

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Right now we have issues with rebuilding the summarization level. It's updating but while executing the reports, it's not showing the write amount. It's not updating any records with summarization level. Can anybody please help me with this to resolve. Your time and help will be really appreciate. Thanks & Regards, Niki Shah.
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: Summarization levels rebuilding

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 9:14 PM response to: Niki Shah in
E-mail this message
Reply
Check the selection status profile, may be some of the orders have been marked for deletion and hence, those values are not being picked up?
Niki Shah

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 10:56 PM response to: Sridhar Vasudevan in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Sridhar, Thanks for the reply. I dont understand where you want me to see? Can you please explain little bit in detail OR can you please give me path or tcode where I can check? Thanks & Regards, Dhaval.
Niki Shah

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 11:20 PM in response to: Niki Shah
E-mail this message
Reply
HI Sridhar, I checked it and it's not related with this. Thanks for your time. Please help me with your another thought.
Thanks & Regards, Dhaval.

Thread: Enter only one non-statistical account assignment (J1IIN)

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 9:25 PM Last Post By: Sridhar Vasudevan
Rambabu Yeminedi
Enter only one non-statistical account assignment (J1IIN)

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Friends, We are facing one problem relating to controlling. Here we are assigning internal order in sales order for scrap sales and we are doing order related billing. we are maintaining different GL accounts for billing and Exicse accounts for Excise and this accounts are cost elements. when we are doing the billing system is not creating any error message and we are activated COPA also. So in billing COPA document is generating. we are tried to post the excise invoice for this billing document using the standard transaction code J1IIN.
But system is giving the error message "Enter only one non-statistical account assignment" Please suggest. Regards Ram Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: Enter only one nonstatistical account assignment (J1IIN)

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 9:25 PM in response to: Rambabu Yeminedi
E-mail this message
Reply
The system does not recognize whether it should be assigned to the sales order or to the internal order probably. There is every possibility of program error, please refer to oss notes like 170014.
Pages: 1
Thread: Creation of a new costing variant to cost production orders

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Alanis Smith
Creation of a new costing variant to cost production orders

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 12:18 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi all,
Forum Points: 0
Currently the business is only able to cost a vehicles production order at the standard cost value which is determined at the start of the year. During the year a number of the purchasing values will be updated with a new contract price, this increase will not be reflected in the standard cost until the end of the year. The business would like a new costing variant which will cost an already created vehicle in SAP by its production order at the Current Cost (current purchasing info record value). It will need to be calculated in the following way: Purchased material - at purchase cost from info record (see below for applicable exchange rate). Manufactured material - child material to be at purchase cost (from info record). Routing cost (labour\overhead, etc) at current criteria. No allowance for CPI. WHAT DOES_CPI_MEAN_? Exchange rate: ideally, fields are provided to input exchange rate. If this is not possible then apply current months exchange; FRAs - current rate from the info record. Summary of total material cost by origin code with ability to drill down to line level. The output of the report will need to be similar to the layout of a production order but with only the current value displayed. We have some problems to understand this request: we don't know the transaction which is used by the users to costificate a production order and what does it mean "CPI". We are not sure on the feasibility of the costing variant requested because it must consider both actual costs and standard costs. It should costificate in this way: (Actual Cost of Row Material * Bom's standard qty) + (Standard price * Standard production time (in the routings). Could you help us? Many thanks to all of you, best regards. Alanis Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: Creation of a new costing variant to cost production orders

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 9:20 PM in response to: Alanis Smith
E-mail this message
Reply
You can create a new costing variant with a valuation variant that points to inforecords for material prices. Go to OKKN t-code and create the required configuration and start using the new costing variant to measure the current cost of making vehicles.
Pages: 1
Thread: Cost of production

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
jay jay
Cost of production
E-mail this message
Reply
hi experts, I want to know the cost of production, cost of sales and closing stock of finished goods as on particular date with qty and value. how can i get this report? please reply anybody. urgent. thanks & regards jay
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: Cost of production

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 9:12 PM in response to: jay jay
E-mail this message
Reply
Closing stock could be taken as on a date as it is a balance sheet item. Check MB5B for stock on a given date. You may resort to COPA reports to or analyze relavant GL account for cost of sales and cost of production.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Material ledger postings in COPA

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 8:57 PM Last Post By: Madhav Nanduri
Neha
Material ledger postings in COPA

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:26 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
HI, Can somebody tell me how to look for the material ledger postings in COPA? Thanks in advance Neha
Madhav Nanduri
Re: Material ledger postings in COPA

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:57 PM in response to: Neha
E-mail this message
Reply
Check the configuration in KEI1 and determine to which value field the ML differences are getting posted in COPA. You can then run reports on that value fields to determine the ML postings. Thanks, Madhav Nanduri
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: okb9
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
vivek yacham
okb9
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:21 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi SAP experts, Can any one tell me if there is any spesific place or T Code for recociliation of FI and CO Pls? Your help is much apriciated. Vivek
Madhav Nanduri
Re: okb9
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:44 PM response to: vivek yacham in
E-mail this message
Reply
KALC transaction will help you to identify the differences between CO and FI. It can also help you in posting the differences. Thanks, Madhav Nanduri
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: okb9
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:45 PM response to: vivek yacham in
E-mail this message
Reply
In Pre New-GL scenario, use KALC for CO reconciliation with FI. When new GL is active, it is always reconcilied.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: KKBC_ORD to include Work Center

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Peter Zaborowski
KKBC_ORD to include Work Center

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:53 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Everyone, Is there a way to include "Work Center" as a column to the report generated with KKBC_ORD? We have a few of the same activities that are are used within many different work centers and would like to see the work centers that are used in the detailed expense. Thanks, Pete
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: CO03
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 6:23 PM Last Post By: rau moder
rau moder
CO03
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 11:10 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi All, When i'm analysing CO03-->Goto-->Cost-->Analysis.i'm getting different result for production order costs? last week,i can see overhead cost in target cost column(Target cost = standard cost) and now i cant see for newly created production orders. At what point the target cost will be calculate in Production order?any help is appreciated. Thanks, Rau
yudha setiawan
Re: CO03
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:21 AM response to: rau moder in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Target cost will be shown at the time good receipt has been done. Target cost = standard cost, as long as no good receipt taken, system don't know which standard cost uses. Re: CO03
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 4:21 PM response to: yudha setiawan in E-mail this message
rau moder
Reply
Hi Yudha, Thanks for your reply. i cant see overhead after GR and i can see Raw material and labor,but no overhead on tager cost column. we have costing sheet created and everything is working fine like KGI2
t.code.but i cant see in target costs column. Thanks, Rau Dragan Manojlov
Re: CO03
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 4:29 PM response to: rau moder in
E-mail this message
Reply
If you havent target costs, it means that you are not released cost estimate for finished products. Go to ck11n and ck24 and do it.
rau moder
Re: CO03
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:23 PM response to: Dragan Manojlov in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Dragan, Thanks for your reply. i have released cost estimate,but not showing overhead cost on target cost columns. Thanks, Rau
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: primary and secondary cost element

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 2:43 PM Last Post By: Vivek Sahni
nitin aggarwal
primary and secondary cost element

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 2:35 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Plaese let me know difference between primary and secondary cost element Re: primary and secondary cost element
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 2:43 PM in response to: nitin aggarwal E-mail this message
Vivek Sahni
Reply
Hi Nitin You will find following information as useful in diffentiating between Primary & Secondary cost element. Primary cost elements are like materail costs, personnel costs, energy costs... where a corresponding GL account exists in FI..to allow costs to flow... Secondary cost elements are like production costs, material overheads, production overheads, they can be created and administered in only CO. These are used in internal cost allocation, overhead calculation, settlement transactions., it does not flow to FI... Primary Cost Element
When cost element carriers cost between FI and CO they are called Primary, the link is established GL A/c = Cost element(Primary). A question may arise as to whether all GL accounts are cost element, it again depends upon the business requirement, where COPA is active then revenue account (GL) are also cost elements, where COPA is not active then revenue account (GL) should not be made as an cost element. Example.... Again cost of goods sold particularly in VAX (make to stock) is not an cost element, where the same COGS in VAY (make to order) is a cost element. Price Difference account should not be made as cost element. Entry while booking expenses Travel Expenses A/c - with Cost Centre Dr. Rs.YY (will be a GL A/c and cost element) - entries flows to CO thru FI To Cash A/c Cr. Rs.YY Secondary Cost Element
When cost element carries cost with in CO, then they are called secondary cost element. Example.... - Take Product Costing On manufacture of the goods the cost of the above product (production order) is arrived at accumulating material cost + operational cost + overheads (%), additive cost if any. The cost of operation is accumulated in cost centre be it production / production service / service cost centres, while booking FI entries. Those operational cost has to be allocated to production order based on operational activities carried on and its cost involved in it. Those operation activities in CO are termed as activity types and has to link the same in KP26 with rates and cost centre (ie., sender cost centre and receiver production order). Reward points, if found useful. Regards VIVEK SAHNI
Thread: data flow from profit centers to copa

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 2:05 PM Last Post By: Daniela Kallenb...
chandra shekar
data flow from profit centers to copa

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:38 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, please explain me how the data flow from profit centers to copa? Thanks in Advance Regards, Chandu
Daniela Kallenb...
Re: data flow from profit centers to copa

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 2:05 PM in response to: chandra shekar
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi chandra, profit center accounting is only a receiving application which means that PCA receives relevant information from MM/FI/SD/HR/CO etc but does not send data to these applications. Therefore there is no data flow from PCA to CO-PA. Vice versa there is a data flow. Cheers, Daniela
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Copa Condition type errors
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Henry Paul
Copa Condition type errors

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 5:08 AM
Reply
Hi Sap Friend,
What to check the copa condition type, which already assinged to sales value. Where can i go and check it out in profitablity analysis. I want to check condition type : ZSC4 (Which already created by sap, there is some values going to this condition type but there so value wrong in this condition type so that i have to go and check this condition type. kindly let me know where i go and check it out.
Regards
H Paul Jigar Thakkar

Re: Copa Condition type errors

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:43 AM response to: Henry Paul in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Friend, Please go to following path IMG > Controlling > Profitability Analysis > Flows of Actual Values > Transfer of Billing Documents > Assign Value Fields Now check whether which condition type is assigned to COPA Value fields Hope it found useful Regards, Jigar
Balaji
Re: Copa Condition type errors

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 1:52 PM response to: Henry Paul in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Check the Pricing Procedure first and see the GL determination for the Account key Assigned in the proceduer against the Condition type. Then find out which value fiedl has to assigned to that Condition type in
orde to make the values flow in COPA. Now use KE4I or the Above mentioned menu path and assign or check the Value Field against the condition type. Regards Balaji
Thread: Variance calculation doubt

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Samrat Roy
Variance calculation doubt

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:38 AM
Reply
Hi,, While I run Variance calculation through KKS2 I found the value in Target cost and Allocated Actual cost , but no values in Actual cost and WIP. Here Taget cost and Allocated actual cost values are different. These are available while click on Cost element tab in KKS2 Kindly guide me as early as possible why values are not coming in Actual cost and WIP and what is the actual reason for different values under Target cost and Allocated Actual cost ? With Regards,
Samrat Edited by: Samrat Roy on Jul 10, 2008 8:40 AM Balaji
Re: Variance calculation doubt

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 1:25 PM in response to: Samrat Roy
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You need to settle the Varinace against the order in order to reverse the WIP and post the Variance. And also see that the costing run has been done for the material. (Target Cost Determination) Also check that GR has been made against the Order. (Final Cost) Actually the Actaul cost is determined against the GI for that Order and that materail sholud have the costing run for the period. Actual cost is determind by the Price control in the particular master multiplied by the quantity confirmed in the production. Regards Balaji
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: how to delete cost element after posting data

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 1:22 PM Last Post By: Elaine Fitzsimons
chandra shekar
how to delete cost element after posting data

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:44 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, i got a requirement. Now we are using one element.now i have don't want to use cost element. I want to use only General ledger account.how to delete that cost element. Thanks in Advance Regards, Chandu
Balaji
Re: how to delete cost element after posting data

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 1:13 PM response to: chandra shekar in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Go to table CSKB and delete the Cost element. Regards Balaji
Elaine Fitzsimons
Re: how to delete cost element after posting data

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 1:22 PM to: chandra shekar in response
Repl y
Hello Chandu, You use transaction code KA04 to delete a cost element, enter the validity period of the master data to completely remove the master data. However this is only possible if there is no dependent data i.e. no postings have occured. If postings have occured you will have to delete these postings before you can remove the cost element. Note 551506 is the FAQ note for CO, below is an extract of one of the points: =================================== Question: What must I do to delete master data, for which transaction data already exists? Answer: Changes to the order criteria of the master data in Overhead Cost Controlling can either only be deleted on specific key dates (see Note 62716) or after you delete all existing transaction data for this master record. To do this, it is necessary to use the 'Trash can' pushbutton to delete for the manually planned values, setting to zero alone does not suffice. Even if you deleted all transaction data, the tax rates for the master data remain in individual cases. To delete these tax rates, there are various reports: for
COKA rates of RKPLNC18 (LC 51513) and for CSSL rates of RKPLNC29 (LC 129584). ==================================== The following programs are also available to remove plan, actuals: RKACOR20 Correction Program: Delete CO Documents With Origin in External Acctg. RKCORR12 Correction Program: Delete Unnecessary COBK_INDX Entries RKPLNC18 Delete COKA Entries for Cost Center and Cost Center/Activity Type RKPLNC25 Delete COKA entries for one cost element RKPLNC31 Delete COSL record without COKL RKPLNC39 Delete COKP records without COKA RKPLNC41 Delete COSS with Business Transaction RKPL if no COKL Record Exists Regards, Elaine
Thread: Difference between Assesment,Distribution and allocation

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 1:05 PM Last Post By: Manju Sagwal
chandra shekar
Difference between Assesment,Distribution and
E-mail this message
Reply
allocation
Posts: 12 Registered: 4/30/08 Forum Points: 0 Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:40 PM
HI, What is the difference between Assesment, Distribution and allocation.
Thanks in Advance, Regards, Chandu Ragini Tiwari

Re: Difference between Assesment,Distribution and allocation

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, 1. In distribution we allocate primary costs of a cost center.Assessment is a method of allocating primary and secondary costs.In assessment we have to assign primary cost element or group of primary cost element to assessment cost element. 2. Primary cost element is retained in Distribution whereas its not retained in Assessment 3. Allocation through assessment is useful when the composition of the costs is unimportant for the receiver. For example, the assessment of cafeteria costs to a cost center need not be broken down further.. Allocation is a process of assessing or distributing amounts and quantities from one sender object to one or more receiver objects - for example, from one cost center to multiple cost centers.
Manju Sagwal
Re: Difference between Assesment,Distribution and allocation

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, 1) Allocations: Allocations enable you to periodically allocate amounts and quantities from sender objects to receiver objects. The two main types of allocations are assessment and distribution. You can allocate both plan and actual data. You perform the allocation using the allocation cycle function. You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities should be allocated from sender object to receiver object. To effect the allocation, you have to make various settings in Customizing. You make the settings in Customizing under Financial Accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Periodic Processing -> Allocation. 2) Assessment: A business activity used to allocate quantities and
amounts (actual and plan values) from one sender object to one or more receiver objects. The assessment process posts the sender amounts to an assessment account. The SAP system then allocates the amounts from the assessment account to the receiver(s) - not directly from the original sender account. The assessment works in the same way as the distribution. However, with the assessment, the debit and credit postings do not occur under the original account or the original cost element but under an assessment account or an assessment cost element. The information of the original account/original cost element are lost. 3) Distribution: A business activity used to allocate quantities and amounts (actual and plan values) from one sender object to one or more receiver objects. The distribution process distributes the balance(s) from the original sender(s) to the receivers. The original sender account is credited and the original receiver account is debited by the distribution. The debit and credit postings for the distribution occur under the original account/original cost element with which the amounts and quantities are posted at the sender. The information of the original account/original cost element remains intact. I hope it will help. If helpful, please assign points. Regards, Manju
Thread: commission posting
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Aabir Guha
commission posting
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 11:05 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
What is commission posting?
Manju Sagwal
Re: commission posting

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:57 PM in response to: Aabir Guha
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, A commission case is posted when the acceptance check of the commission case has been successfully run and a processing target has been selected for the posting. If you simulate the commission case, no posting takes place. When a commission case is successfully posted (no "pending" postings), a commission case document is additionally posted. If processing errors occur, this data is stored in a structure that corresponds to the transfer structure (primary document). Commissions are posted like costs in broker collections. Costs only differ from commissions in that they do not occur on a regular basis, and usually there is no payable in the broker account before the broker reports the costs. Posting Commissions: When items of the "commissions" category are posted, the system assumes that the amount posted refers to a commission in the broker account. You can enter different values in the fields Partner, Insurance object, Contract account: 1) Broker, Broker contract, Broker contract account: In this case all items are selected that do not refer to a certain customer contract. 2) Business partner, Contract, Customer contract account: In this case all items are selected that refer to the specified customer contract. The reference to an insurance policy is produced by entries in the commissions line items. If no open items were defined previously for the item (by a proposal
or manual selection), all open items assigned to the specified partner, contract and account, and belonging to the category Commissions, are selected during posting. I hope it will help. If helpful, please assign points. Regards, Manju
Thread: Periodic reposting of revenue

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Sangeeta
Periodic reposting of revenue

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:30 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi SAP Gurus, Pls help me on this one: Total rebate received (revenue element) from vendor is collected (statistically) in the Head Office Profit Center. From here, it has to be moved to the different stores (Profit Centers) on the basis of COGS in each store using variable portions. We are not implementing COPA, so there is no real posting of revenue happening.
I have tried assigning an internal order1 to the revenue element to collect the revenuein the head office so that I can distribute it using Periodic Reposting. I tried 2 methods: 1) I first created orders2&3 which I assigned to the Stores profit centers. Then I tried to post from order1 to 2& 3. But I got the error "The segment contains no receivers (Message no. GA733)" 2) I then created cost centers (which allowed statistical posting of revenues) which I assigned to the Stores profit centers. Then I tried to post from order 1 to the 2 cost centers. But I got the same error. Could anyone please help me out with this???? Regards, Sangeeta
Thread: Tables for the production order costs

Search Forum
Back to Thread List
MHP
Tables for the production order costs

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:40 AM
E-mail this message
Hi all, I want to know the tables from where i can get---1) Planned cost of the production order----materials, activities, overheads. 2) Actual cost of the production order----materials, activities, overheads. Regards, MHP Moderator: Crossposting - thread locked. Edited by: Karl Helm on Jul 10, 2008 9:45 AM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Actual Assessment

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
venkata raju kh...
Actual Assessment
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Experts,
I want to create Actual Assessment Cycle and receivers cost centers should receive the value based on Actual Amount. Pl advise. Raju
venkata raju kh...

Re: Actual Assessment

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 12:55 PM response to: venkata raju kh... in
E-mail this message
Reply
Any responses please.....................
Suresh Kumar

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 1:17 PM to: venkata raju kh... in response
E-mail this message
Reply
hi, u can create assessment cycle in ksu1, ksu2 - change ksu5 - execute Regards, suresh
Vinod Digumarthy

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Did you use these values in the assessment cycle: Sender Values Sender Rule: 1 Posted Amounts Share In: 100% Actual Values Selected Receiver Tracing Factor Receiver Rule: 1 Variable Portions Var. Portion Type: 1 Actual Costs
Pawan Kumar

E-mail this message
Reply
Please create Actual Assessment Cycle by TCode KSU1. Keep receiver tracing factor as Actual Amount. Give Group of Cost Element and try. Hope this will solve your problem. Regards,
Pawan Kumar Manju Sagwal


Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:56 AM in response to: venkata raju kh...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You can create Actual Assessment Cycle by TCode KSU1. To create assessment cycles and assessment segments, go to the SAP Easy Access screen and choose Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> General Ledger -> Periodic Processing -> y Closing -> Allocation -> Actual Assessment/Actual Distribution -> Create

Thread: account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 7:09 AM Last Post By: Cyrus Minab
shrikant patil
account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Gurus, I am getting 'account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible' this error when i tried initial entry of stock. I check the settings in Tcode OMWD and OBYC, they are fine but still getting that error. can anyone please help me with this. Regards, Shrikant
shrikant patil
Re: account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 5:16 PM response to: shrikant patil in
E-mail this message
Reply
continue from previous message...... When i tried to use MB1C Tcode rather MIGO for initial entry of stock i got "determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 ZOB 3000 not possible" error can anyone please have look into it. thanks
Rukshana Sameem
E-mail this message
Reply
Hiya if u are sure that u have defined all the entries in GBB and the relevant combinations, then check for the offsetting entry to GBB - which is BSX and make sure u have entered all account assignments there too Hope this helps Rukshana
shrikant patil
E-mail this message
Reply
Thanks for reply. Yes, I have checked those settings. seems fine. still getting same error. Regards,
Cyrus Minab
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:09 AM response to: shrikant patil in
E-mail this message
Reply
There could be a problem with the movement type 561 and value or quantity string. Check table 156S and also trans. OMWN.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: commission posting

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Aabir Guha
commission posting
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 11:05 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
What is commission posting?
Manju Sagwal
Re: commission posting

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:57 PM in response to: Aabir Guha
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,
Forum Points: 106
A commission case is posted when the acceptance check of the commission case has been successfully run and a processing target has been selected for the posting. If you simulate the commission case, no posting takes place. When a commission case is successfully posted (no "pending" postings), a commission case document is additionally posted. If processing errors occur, this data is stored in a structure that corresponds to the transfer structure (primary document). Commissions are posted like costs in broker collections. Costs only differ from commissions in that they do not occur on a regular basis, and usually there is no payable in the broker account before the broker reports the costs. Posting Commissions: When items of the "commissions" category are posted, the system assumes that the amount posted refers to a commission in the broker account. You can enter different values in the fields Partner, Insurance object, Contract account: 1) Broker, Broker contract, Broker contract account: In this case all items are selected that do not refer to a certain customer contract. 2) Business partner, Contract, Customer contract account: In this case all items are selected that refer to the specified customer contract. The reference to an insurance policy is produced by entries in the commissions line items. If no open items were defined previously for the item (by a proposal or manual selection), all open items assigned to the specified partner, contract and account, and belonging to the category Commissions, are selected during posting. I hope it will help. If helpful, please assign points. Regards, Manju
Thread: Periodic reposting of revenue

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Sangeeta
Periodic reposting of revenue

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:30 PM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi SAP Gurus, Pls help me on this one: Total rebate received (revenue element) from vendor is collected (statistically) in the Head Office Profit Center. From here, it has to be moved to the different stores (Profit Centers) on the basis of COGS in each store using variable portions. We are not implementing COPA, so there is no real posting of revenue happening. I have tried assigning an internal order1 to the revenue element to collect the revenuein the head office so that I can distribute it using Periodic Reposting. I tried 2 methods: 1) I first created orders2&3 which I assigned to the Stores profit centers. Then I tried to post from order1 to 2& 3. But I got the error "The segment contains no receivers (Message no. GA733)" 2) I then created cost centers (which allowed statistical posting of revenues) which I assigned to the Stores profit centers. Then I tried to post from order 1 to the 2 cost centers. But I got the same error. Could anyone please help me out with this???? Regards, Sangeeta
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
New content since your last visit
Updated content since your last visit
Thread: Tables for the production order costs

Search Forum
Back to Thread List
MHP
Tables for the production order costs

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 8:40 AM
E-mail this message
Hi all, I want to know the tables from where i can get---1) Planned cost of the production order----materials, activities, overheads. 2) Actual cost of the production order----materials, activities, overheads. Regards, MHP Moderator: Crossposting - thread locked. Edited by: Karl Helm on Jul 10, 2008 9:45 AM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Actual Assessment

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
venkata raju kh...

Actual Assessment
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Experts, I want to create Actual Assessment Cycle and receivers cost centers should receive the value based on Actual Amount. Pl advise. Raju
venkata raju kh...


Posted: Jul 9, 2008 12:55 PM response to: venkata raju kh... in
E-mail this message
Reply
Any responses please.....................
Suresh Kumar

E-mail this message
Reply
hi, u can create assessment cycle in ksu1, ksu2 - change
ksu5 - execute Regards, suresh Vinod Digumarthy


E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Did you use these values in the assessment cycle: Sender Values Sender Rule: 1 Posted Amounts Share In: 100% Actual Values Selected Receiver Tracing Factor Receiver Rule: 1 Variable Portions Var. Portion Type: 1 Actual Costs
Pawan Kumar

E-mail this message
Reply
Please create Actual Assessment Cycle by TCode KSU1. Keep receiver tracing factor as Actual Amount. Give Group of Cost Element and try. Hope this will solve your problem. Regards, Pawan Kumar
Manju Sagwal

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:56 AM in response to: venkata raju kh...
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You can create Actual Assessment Cycle by TCode KSU1. To create assessment cycles and assessment segments, go to the SAP Easy Access screen and choose Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> General Ledger -> Periodic Processing -> y Closing -> Allocation -> Actual Assessment/Actual Distribution -> Create

Thread: account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 4 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 7:09 AM Last Post By: Cyrus Minab
shrikant patil
account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Gurus, I am getting 'account determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 3000 not possible' this error when i tried initial entry of stock. I check the settings in Tcode OMWD and OBYC, they are fine but still getting that error. can anyone please help me with this. Regards, Shrikant
shrikant patil
E-mail this message
Reply
continue from previous message...... When i tried to use MB1C Tcode rather MIGO for initial entry of stock i got
"determination for entry CAGB GBB 0001 ZOB 3000 not possible" error can anyone please have look into it. thanks Rukshana Sameem
E-mail this message
Reply
Hiya if u are sure that u have defined all the entries in GBB and the relevant combinations, then check for the offsetting entry to GBB - which is BSX and make sure u have entered all account assignments there too Hope this helps Rukshana
shrikant patil
E-mail this message
Reply
Thanks for reply. Yes, I have checked those settings. seems fine. still getting same error. Regards,
Cyrus Minab
Posted: Jul 10, 2008 7:09 AM response to: shrikant patil in
E-mail this message
Reply
There could be a problem with the movement type 561 and value or quantity string. Check table 156S and also trans. OMWN.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: settlment receiver?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 14 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 6:48 AM Last Post By: yudha setiawan
Eric Van Zundert

settlment receiver?
Posted: Jul 8, 2008 11:21 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi friends, I have material X and Y. Both in the same sales order. I create 2 production orders. Product X has settlement receiver MAT, product Y has settlement receiver SDI. How can this happen? Where can I look to change it always to MAT? Thank you in advance, Eric van Zundert
Jigar Thakkar
Re: settlment receiver?

Posted: Jul 8, 2008 11:26 AM response to: Eric Van Zundert in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Please check the Allocation Structure KSES. Also check the Settlement Profile assigned to it. Regards, Jigar
Ijaz Hussain Bu...


Posted: Jul 8, 2008 12:10 PM response to: Jigar Thakkar in
E-mail this message
Reply
Check Settlement Profile and leave blank field of Default Object Type or enter MAT. Cheers
Eric Van Zundert


Posted: Jul 8, 2008 12:56 PM response to: Ijaz Hussain Bu... in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, I checked. But that cannot be the case. Maybe the material type?
Any suggestions are welcome. Regards, eRic. Shrikant Rakate


Posted: Jul 8, 2008 4:14 PM response to: Eric Van Zundert in
E-mail this message
Reply
Check OPUV, default settlement rule should be PP1 or PP2. It seems either your prod order type or plant are different for your 2 PP orders. Also check the settlement rule in CO02, goto Header->Settlement rule, MAT should be specified in first column CAT. Regards
Eric Van Zundert


Posted: Jul 8, 2008 7:42 PM response to: Shrikant Rakate in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Correct, the default is PP1. But why SDI and MAT for the same PP ordertype and the same plant?? Any suggestions? Something on the material? Best Regards, Eric.
rau moder

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Check your material strategy group on MRP3 tab in Material master. Thanks, Rau
Eric Van Zundert


Posted: Jul 8, 2008 8:06 PM response to: rau moder in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Strategy group is for both materials X and Y the same! Any suggestions? Thank you, Eric.
sasi n

E-mail this message
Reply
hi can u tell the error message. other wise go to OMS2 ther u select the check boxes for ur material type.onse u open the screen u will understand .from their it will pick the MAT settilment. Re: settlment receiver?
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 6:47 AM response to: sasi n in E-mail this message Reply
Eric Van Zundert

Hi, I also thought the oms2 transaction should provide the solution. But Q and V update are for material X and Y the same! What can it be? Any suggestions? Best Regards, Eric.
Shrikant Rakate

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, It appears to me account assignment issue related to SD-MM. Not sure what exactly it is. Regards
sasi n

E-mail this message
Reply
hi if it wotks kaindly fallow this. plz compare the both materails wat are changes u faind in material master plz see the linkages .hear stratagey group got different settilemnt profile linkage u gest see .bus sales order one procument tab wher reqirment type is linked with this reqirment classand class is linked with strategy may be from ther it is picking i am not sure . u plz kaindly go through it. Re: settlment receiver?
Posted: Jul 9, 2008 8:18 PM response to: Eric Van Zundert in E-mail this message Reply
Radha N
SDI means `sales order item'. If your material is non-valuated, system automatically assign the settlement reciever SDI. Check the material master for Account assignment category (i think 'E' is assigned) Check the Requirement type for the requirment class and strategy group combination. In the requirement class you can find the check mark for `sales order item'. If you don't want sales order item, remove check mark and give 'valuation' M in the same screen.
First ensure your material is valuated or non-valuated. If it is non-valuated, the current settings are correct. Regards Radha Eric Van Zundert

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 8:21 PM response to: Radha N in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Both material types are valuted! Thank you, Eric.
yudha setiawan

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, You say that you have 2 material line item in Sales Order.Then, you have 2 production order which is material X and Y. Settlement of production order for material X is MAT, but settlement of production order for material Y is SDI. Am i right?? Check if there is possibilities that material Y is make to order (good receipt of Pro to customer stock). If it is like that, then it means your customer stock is non valuated. This is the reason why settlement for production order material Y is SDI.
Pages: 1
Thread: Material master - profit centre
Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
sagar kamath
Material master - profit centre

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:24 AM
E-mail this message
Reply
hi, i have 2 plants under one company code. and each plant has a unique profit centre. my requirement is system should not allow to use the other plant profit centre. EX: AAA is company code BBB and CCC are plants unde AAA company code BB is profit centre for BBB plant CC is profit centre for CCC plant. *in the above scenario BB cant be used for CCC plant and CC cant be used for BBB plant* how to make the same setting.... same controlling area for both profit centre.. any user exit, BADI, Routins.....pl.. let me know Edited by: sagar kamath on Jul 10, 2008 9:56 AM
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: Shipment cost transfer to COPA

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 6:13 AM Last Post By: TCS Consultant
TCS Consultant
Shipment cost transfer to COPA

E-mail this message
Reply
Hi How can I transfer Shipment cost to COPA . I am using Both Costing and Accounting based COPA. Mapped Billing Conditions to Value fields. But shipment cost arises before to billing document. Hence I am not able to see Shipment Conditions in KE4I to map to Value fields. To map to Shipment conditions where can i do the configuration. Also tried by linking value field to corresponding GL code and changing field status variant of GL code. But no use. Also requested other alternatives. Thanks in Advance.
Radha N
Re: Shipment cost transfer to COPA

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 8:09 PM response to: TCS Consultant in
E-mail this message
Reply
You can enter new entries for Shipment Conditions in KE4I to map the value fileds. Or You can map shipping costs in PA transfer structure for directi posting for FI in KEI1. But it is not advisable. Radha
TCS Consultant
Re: Shipment cost transfer to COPA

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 6:13 AM response to: Radha N in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi Radha, I tried to map IN KE4I but shipment cost conditions are not related to Billing
document hence theare conditions are not coming here. Pls let me know using account base copa can we have report based on material and billing document wise Thanks
Thread: Are there any SLA's

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 10, 2008 12:01 AM Last Post By: Ramesh Threads: [ Previous | Next ] Reddy Na...
srinivasulu kop...
Are there any SLA's

E-mail this message
Reply
Are there any SLA 's in the production support?
Ramesh Reddy Na...

Re: Are there any SLA's

Posted: Jul 10, 2008 12:01 AM in response to: srinivasulu kop...
E-mail this message
Reply
There will be Service Level Agreement between client and service provider in production support. We have three levels. Critical,
Urgent and Normal. We have minimum time of initial response and maximum time for resolving the issues.
Thread: How to get the budget trough KSB1 Tcode?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
STANISLAS BRESIN
How to get the budget trough KSB1 Tcode?

E-mail this message
Reply
Hey ho, Here is the issue : is there a way to get the budget trough KSB1 Tcode? If not, is there an other transaction to be able to extract Datas with actuals and budget at cost element detail? Many thanks! Stan B
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: How to get the budget trough KSB1 Tcode?

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:21 PM in response to: STANISLAS BRESIN
E-mail this message
Reply
Planning is done at cost center/Cost element level - one amount.
But actual line items happen as and when event happen. You can try S_ALR_87013611 - Cost Centers: Actual/Plan/Variance and then drill down to the line item level.
Thread: Transaction CK33 ?

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
mohammed ibrahim
Transaction CK33 ?
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi All, Can anyone tell me the use of the transaction code CK33. I am a technical consultant and working on an object of FI-CO. I want to know about the tn. code CK33 in detail. Will reward for the response. Thanks, Ibrahim.
rau moder
Re: Transaction CK33 ?

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 4:48 PM in response to: mohammed ibrahim
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi,
Report that compares two cost estimates for materials on the basis of the itemizations. You can use this report to compare two itemizations. The report compares the characteristics item number, item category, cost element, resource, material, cost center, plant/work center, cost center/activity type, operation number, BOM item, assembly indicator, and cost component. If this useful,please assign points. Thanks, Rau
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: Transaction CK33 ?

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 10:11 PM in response to: mohammed ibrahim
E-mail this message
Reply
Generally, standard cost estimates are derived before a finished or semifinished material is produced. So that the actual cost of production can be compared with the standard. The standard costs act as a budget that can be compared with. Assume that there are two bikes manufactured in two colors, one in red and the other blue. You can use this t-code to see how the cost differs between these two products.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Thread: FI Vs PCA difference

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Preeti Agarwal
FI Vs PCA difference
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi SAP Gurus , I have an urgent problem in report .There are couples of clearning documents which are not apperaing in PCA report .These document donot have any amount in 1st local currency , 2nd local currency but have an amount in 3rd local currency . according to our company configuation : 1st local currency =GBP=company code 2nd local currency = DEM= Group currency 3rd local currency =GBP some more points 1 )3rd currency is depend on 1st currency 2) i have checked profit centre currency which is GBP as well. 3) above document are clearning document of revluation documents ( revaluation of GL account which take place on month end ) Please please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! help me . Point will be awarded . Many Thanks Edited by: Preeti Agarwal on Jul 9, 2008 8:10 PM
Sridhar Vasudevan
Re: FI Vs PCA difference

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 9:57 PM response to: Preeti Agarwal in
E-mail this message
Reply
Refer to note 413345 for possible relevant information.
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Control Panel
Welcome, Udit Sheth Your Reward Points Your Questions
Thread: WIP Problem

Search Forum
Watch this Thread
Back to Thread List
Replies: 2 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: Jul 9, 2008 8:55 PM Last Post By: Radha N
Radha N
WIP Problem
Posted: Jun 3, 2008 11:48 AM
Reply
Ours is make to order scenario. Before settlement of production order, if we run KKAX, WIP is showing zero balance. After settlement of production order, before settlement of sales order we are running KKAK, there the wip report is showing process of completion 97% and remaining 3% is going to WIP account. Actually it is full settlement. we want 100% completion... where can i check these settings?? It is not scrap becasue, no scrap in BOM. Thanks & Regards Radha
Balaji
Re: WIP Problem

Posted: Jun 3, 2008 2:31 PM response to: Radha N in
E-mail this message
Reply
Hi, Check the settlement rule for the order for percentage settlement. If order status is not TECHO then it will be shown in WIP but if order status is TECHO there will be no WIP. If any WIP is there settle the order in WIP stage and change the status to TECHO , then again run WIP to reverse the WIP of previous entry and then run the variances and finally settle the variances. Regards Balaji
Radha N
Re: WIP Problem

Posted: Jul 9, 2008 8:55 PM response to: Radha N in
E-mail this message
Reply
solved by Maintaining FBNL Status for RA
Forum Points: 378
Pages: 1
Back to Thread List

Welcome

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Welcome

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Post Goods Issue without reference to order

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

Post Goods Issue without reference to order

E-mail this message

Re: Post Goods Issue without reference to order

E-mail this message

Check the field status variant on GL (OBC4)

Re: Post Goods Issue without reference to order

E-mail this message

I have already done it

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

Powered by Jive Software

Expert Forums SAP Solutions ERP Financials - Controlling

Thread: backup of Cost Center

Reply to this Thread

Watch this Thread

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

backup of Cost Center

E-mail this message

Re: backup of Cost Center

E-mail this message

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

Powered by Jive Software

Expert Forums SAP Solutions ERP Financials - Controlling

Thread: Controlling-Cost Centre Accounting.

Reply to this Thread

Watch this Thread

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

jalla nageswar ...

Controlling-Cost Centre Accounting.

E-mail this message

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

Powered by Jive Software

Welcome, Udit Sheth

Expert Forums SAP Solutions ERP Financials - Controlling

Thread: cash journal

Reply to this Thread

Watch this Thread

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

E-mail this message

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

Powered by Jive Software

Expert Forums SAP Solutions ERP Financials - Controlling

Thread: How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?

This question is not answered.

Reply to this Thread

Watch this Thread

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]

How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?

E-mail this message

Dear SAP Gurus How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ? ND

Re: How would you calculate ACCRUED COSTS ?

E-mail this message

Back to Thread List

Threads: [ Previous | Next ]