Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Overview Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Toxicities Conclusions
GLOSSARY
allogeneic stem cell transplantation A method for delivering high-dose chemothreapy followed by bone marrow or stem cells from a donor. These stem cells are expected to reconstitute the marrow as well as aid in preventing relapse of the disease. autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) A supportive measure that allows delivery of high-dose chemotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplant involves collection of the patients own stem cells for later use after high-dose chemotherapy in order to decrease the time of potentially life-threatening cytopenias. donor lymphocyte infusions In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or multiple myeloma who relapse after allogeneic SCT, infusions of lymphocytes from their SCT donors can result in durable remissions.
graft-versus-disease effect A potentially benecial effect of transplant in which donor lymphocytes recognize the disease of the recipient as foreign and aid in the reduction of tumor burden as well as prolongation of remissions. graft-versus-host disease A potentially fatal complication of allogeneic transplantation in which immune cells of the donor graft mount an immune response against tissues of the recipient. hematopoetic stem cells (HSC) Pluripotent progenitor cells capable of both self-renewal and differentiation, and usually CD34 . HSC may be found in the bone marrow, peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood. stem cell mobilization The process of increasing the availability or peripheralization of CD34 cells in the blood, allowing repeated leukapheresis procedures to be performed, if needed, for the collection of CD34 stem cells.
253
254
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
as well as differentiate. The outcomes of stem cell cycling and division are regulated by adhesion molecules and cytokines in poorly understood ways. With hematopoietic stem cell support in either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), high doses of chemotherapy and radiation can be administered to patients meeting standard criteria for SCT without incurring prolonged life-threatening periods of pancytopenia. Standard criteria for allogeneic or autologous transplantation usually include an age threshold (less than 55 for allogeneic and 70 for autologous), adequate cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal function, no signicant comorbid disease, and the capacity to understand and consent to the treatment. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is useful in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia (AML, ALL), aplastic anemia (AA), myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma (MM), severe combined immunodecency disorder (SCID), and congenital anemias. Allogeneic grafts contain T lymphocytes that may respond to recipient or host antigens. The success of allogeneic transplant is therefore limited by potentially lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, the al-
loreactive potential of the graft may facilitate a graftversus-disease effect. This effect has been developed further in the form of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) given months posttransplant in order to treat relapse in CML and MM. Autologous stem cell transplantation has been successful in non-Hodgkins lymphoma and Hodgkins disease (NHL, HD), multiple myeloma, primary systemic amyloidosis (AL), and some solid tumors.
Peripheral blood
Patients
Bone marrow
Peripheral blood
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
255
cells will also replace bone marrow for allogeneic transplantation. Autologous stem cell mobilization and collection are often associated with the recovery phase following myelosuppressive salvage therapy. After chemotherapy, patients receive hematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or GM-CSF to enhance rebound hematopoiesis. Stem cell mobilization can also be performed with growth factors alone in either cancer patients or, on an investigational basis, in prescreened healthy donors for allogeneic transplant. Another source of stem cells is umbilical cord blood. To date there have been over 600 transplants performed using umbilical cord blood and the preliminary reports are encouraging. However, technical and ethical aspects of umbilical cord blood collection, storage, and use are not yet comprehensively delineated. Limitations of autologous SCT include the potential for relapse secondary to contamination of stem cell components by clonal tumor cells and the lack of an alloreactive graft-versus-disease effect. Although purging or the selection of CD34 HSC may reduce tumor cells in autologous grafts, a clear-cut benet for such manipulations has not been dened prospectively in randomized trials (Fig. 1). In addition, another area of active investigation remains the manipulation of the immune system after autologous SCT by means of immune modulators such as interleukin2 or with cancer vaccines.
60 and 20%, respectively. Thus allogeneic SCT is currently recommended for patients under 55 in chronic phase with an HLA identical donor. In the case of patients in the accelerated phase or blast phase, age plays a larger role. The survival of patients transplanted in the accelerated phase is worse than that of chronic phase patients. Patients in blast phase have very poor post transplant survival and a high probability of relapse. In patients who relapse after allogeneic SCT for CML, lymphocyte infusions from their SCT donor (DLI) can be effective treatment.
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
257
diagnosis a white blood cell count 20,000/ l or poor prognosis cytogenetics such as t(4;11), t(8;14), or t(9;22). The presence of extramedullary disease or failure to respond to initial chemotherapy may also provide a basis for consideration of allogeneic SCT. The use of allogeneic SCT in adults with ALL has been complicated by high rates of GVHD and relapse and by the lack of randomized trials in which patients receive allogeneic SCT in rst CR or at relapse.
eral cytopenias, and a tendency to progress to AML. The pathogenesis of MDS is not completely understood. MDS are associated with certain cytogenetic abnormalities and usually occur during the sixth and seventh decade. The percentage of blasts in the marrow and cytogenetics, where available, remain the most useful prognostic indicators at this time. Many therapies have been used to treat MDS, including hormones, differentiation agents, growth factors, and combination chemotherapy. Chemotherapy has been toxic in older patients with MDS. Experience with SCT for MDS began in the 1980s and, as of 1996, 251 patients had been transplanted at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (FHCC) in Seattle, Washington. The 3-year cumulative nonrelapse mortality was 42%, the disease-free survival was 41%, and the incidence of relapse was 17%. Predictors of nonrelapse mortality were increased patient age and disease duration, whereas predictors of relapse were advanced disease and poor risk cytogenetics ( 3 abnormalities, 7). Good prognostic indicators associated with increased disease-free survival were youth, good risk cytogenetics (normal, deletion Y, isolated abnormalities of 5 or 20), and less advanced disease morphology. Currently, it is recommended that allogeneic SCT be considered for patients under 55 years of age who have lifethreatening cytopenias, increased blasts, poor risk cytogenetics, and an appropriate HLA-matched related donor.
E. Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Data on allogeneic SCT in patients with NHL are difcult to evaluate because there have been few controlled trials. There has been one study comparing allogeneic and autologous SCT in NHL. Results demonstrated a decreased relapse rate in the allogeneic group,
D. Myelodysplasia
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) encompass a series of clonal stem cell disorders characterized by the impaired maturation of hematopoietic cells, periph-
FIGURE 1 (A) CD34 selected HSC from a patient with multiple myeloma are shown. CD34 cells are heterogeneous with respect to proliferative capacity and lineage commitment. Totipotent stem cells comprise about 5% of the total and have the appearance of small lymphocytes. CD34 cells that are committed to become myeloid or erythroid progenitors appear blastic. (B) A myeloid colony is shown, a colony-forming unit granulocytemacrophage (CFU-GM) having grown in semisolid medium innoculated with mobilized blood CD34 cells. CFU-GM represents the progeny of a single CD34 cell committed to the myeloid lineage. (C) Polymerase chain reaction results using patient-specic primers for the clonal myeloma light chain gene show that contamination is present even after CD34 selection (Gene, plasmid containing patient sequence; BM0, bone marrow at diagnosis; BM12, bone marrow at 1 year). A randomized prospective phase III trial in myeloma failed to demonstrate that CD34 selection to purge contaminating tumor cells increased the response rate or provided a survival benet, although tumor cell contamination of stem cell components was reduced by several logs. See color insert in Volume 1.
258
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
albeit with a higher treatment-related mortality in that group as well. Furthermore, there was no survival advantage for the allogeneic SCT group. Preliminary studies have been conducted with minimally myeloablative regimens supported with allogeneic PBSC. Twenty-one patients with recurrent or primary refractory DLCL were treated and 42% survived disease free beyond 1 year. Further study of so-called miniallo transplants using allogeneic PBSC are clearly warranted in this population. Allogeneic SCT has been employed in select NHL patients who have relapsed after autologous SCT.
sues of timing and patient selection, however, remain controversial, particularly since transfusion therapy alone can provide signicant benets for decades. The development of improved forms of iron chelation therapy, as well as the promise of gene therapy, may inuence the decision to seek early allogeneic SCT. At the same time, however, the availability of SCT with umbilical cord blood stem cells provides enhanced opportunities for successful allogeneic SCT at an early age in many cases.
F. Multiple Myeloma
Standard allogeneic SCT has also been performed in MM patients, usually under the age of 55. Thirty-ve to 60% of all patients receiving HLA-matched allografts achieved CR. The peritransplant mortality in historical cohorts, however, is 40 to 60%, with female gender, stage I disease, one course of prior treatment, and CR prior to SCT being favorable prognostic factors for allogeneic SCT. The long-term survival is about one-third. Encouraging results have been obtained employing allogeneic SCT with less aggressive conditioning regimens, often including Fludarabine and Melphalan instead of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation, and allogeneic PBSC instead of marrow. Reduced regimen-related toxicities and mortality have been observed in several small studies.
H. Congenital Anemias
Thalessemia major, sickle cell anemia, and Fanconis anemia are among the congenital anemias that have been successfully treated with allogeneic SCT. The is-
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
259
In the case of follicular lymphoma, the results of phase II studies indicate that remission duration may be prolonged in relapsed follicular lymphoma after HCT as compared with those patients who received standard chemotherapy. However, no survival advantage has been demonstrated. Because median survival is longer for patients with follicular lymphoma than for patients with other NHL, the long-term effect of transplant, such as secondary AML or MDS, should be considered. Consideration therefore should be given to delaying SCT until relapse. The major cause of treatment failure in NHL is relapse of disease. In the future, approaches to SCT for NHL may remedy this problem by providing better cytoreductive regimens, by performing SCT earlier in the disease process, and nally by consolidating therapy with either radiation or immunotherapy prior to or after SCT.
B. Hodgkins Disease
HD is one of the success stories of modern oncology. With conventional chemotherapy, approximately 50% of patients can be cured. However, 25% of patients with HD never achieve CR and a similar percentage of patients who achieve CR will relapse. The poor results in some relapsed patients with salvage chemotherapy led to an interest in high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous SCT based on the theory that increased dose intensity would increase cell kill. Despite intercenter variability in patient selection, numerous phase II studies reported CR rates greater than 40% after SCT, some reporting rates as high as 70%, with disease-free survival rates as high as 50% at 5 years. Overall, based on these robust phase II results, high-dose chemotherapy with SCT has become an accepted modality of treatment for relapsed or primary refractory HD. Randomized studies have not been performed, but the responses are clearly better than those achieved with conventional salvage chemotherapy. Moreover, the transplant-related mortality is under 5%, making SCT an approach whose safety may be superior to salvage chemotherapy. It is hoped that more effective preparative regimens will be found in the future to improve the survival curve and decrease the rate of relapse.
260
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
cells responsible for producing these light chains, investigators hypothesized that one could halt the deposition process. In patients eligible for autologous SCT, this hypothesis was conrmed using G-CSF for stem cell mobilization and intravenous melphalan for high-dose therapy. CR was achieved in over half of the patients and improvements in all types of amyloid-related organ dysfunction were documented. However, the initial experience at multiple centers was complicated by a 100-day mortality rate that averaged 25%. It became obvious that because of visceral reserve limited by deposition disease, AL patients have greater toxicity in SCT than patients with MM receiving the same high-dose therapy. This has led to improvements in patient selection. One current recommendation is that SCT should not be offered to AL patients with symptomatic cardiac amyloid and recurrent pleural effusions or syncope, or to patients over the age of 50 with more than two major systems compromised by AL (of heart, liver, kidneys, and peripheral nerves). Therefore, autologous SCT for select patients with AL is a new and often effective therapy for an otherwise uniformly fatal disease. Future directions include the development of clinical trials of SCT following heart or liver allografts.
55%, autologous 48%, and chemotherapy 30%, with a statistically signicant improvement in survival for allogeneic and autologous SCT as compared with chemotherapy. However, the North America study group conducted a similar study and found that the 4-year DFS for chemotherapy, autologous HCT, and allogeneic HCT was 35, 37, and 42%, respectively. The most important pretransplant prognostic factor was cytogenetics. Patients with poor risk cytogenetics did better with allogeneic transplant. Overall studies indicate that for patients with AML who lack an HLA-matched sibling donor and who are older than 50, autologous SCT may be a viable option in those with either standard risk or poor risk cytogenetics. In patients with good risk cytogenetics, however, SCT likely represents a form of rst-line salvage therapy if a chemotherapy regimen containing high-dose cytarabine fails.
E. Solid Tumors
Given its success in other diseases, high-dose therapy with autologous SCT has also been attempted in germ cell tumors, neuroblastoma, and breast cancer. Beginning at Indiana University in 1986, a small percentage of patients with germ cell tumors who had multiple relapses were shown to respond to high-dose therapy with SCT. These results were conrmed in multiple other studies, and, more recently, high-dose therapy with SCT has been studied as primary therapy for patients with poor risk primary mediastinal germ cell tumors. Neuroblastoma is a tumor of the peripheral nervous system that affects children under the age of 15. Forty percent of patients have low or intermediate risk tumors and can be treated with conventional therapy to achieve substantial long-term survival. The other 60%, however, cannot achieve long-term survivals with conventional therapy. High-dose therapy and autologous SCT have improved the long-term survival of some high-risk patients. Studies to enhance long-term survival for a larger percentage of patients are ongoing. These involve improved induction regimens, the use of biological agents such as monoclonal antibodies as adjuncts, and modulation of drug resistance. The use of SCT in patients with metastatic (and high-risk) breast cancer is one of the most revealing
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
261
medical stories of the recent past. Mobilized blood stem cells made SCT less morbid at a time when American hospitals sought to expand services and income, transplant physicians to develop SCT programs, and biotech companies to nd new markets. Concurrently, breast cancer medicine became a major political affair and breast cancer patients and their families struggled as part of a growing community with decisions about what the best treatments might be. The initial justication for high-dose therapy with SCT was that there was no other therapy that achieved complete responses in metastatic disease. Unfortunately, the appropriate phase III trials, designed to determine whether a survival benet attached to SCT, were difcult to perform for many reasons. Finally, upon their completion (a credit to oncology as a clinical science), overall survival in metastatic breast cancer was not shown to be improved with SCT. Whether the use of autologous SCT for high risk breast cancer will be revisited with new drugs such as bone chelating radiopharmaceuticals is unclear at this time.
parity between donor and recipient. GVHD can occur early in SCT and be immediately life-threatening (acute GVHD), involving the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver, or it can occur months after SCT (chronic GVHD) as a deleterious and often debilitating syndrome similar to severe scleroderma, requiring chronic steroid treatment. Selective CD8 T-cell depletion or improved prophylactic regimens, including the use of intravenous cyclosporine and new immunosuppressive agents, such as mycophenolate, may help decrease the incidence of acute GVHD in the HLA identical setting. Moreover, the use of T-celldepleted grafts in the setting of related HLA haploidentical SCT can decrease the incidence of GVHD. Of note, the use of unmanipulated allogeneic PBSC appears to be associated with no increase in acute GVHD but possibly with an increased incidence of chronic GVHD.
B. Regimen-Related Toxicities
The toxicities of both allogeneic and autologous SCT are primarily related to the treatment regimens and include acute bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Furthermore, the convalescent phase is often marked by gastrointestinal incapacities, marked fatigue, and cognitive difculties. As cytotherapies emerge as a major force in the treatment of cancer, these side effects will become targets for novel drugs and trials, particularly involving the use of agents promising to protect the gastrointestinal tract, such as keratinocyte growth factor.
262
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
The future of SCT, then, will involve research to help decrease the risks and improve the long-term outcomes so that patients who are free from disease may go on to lead full and normal lives.
V. CONCLUSIONS
Stem cell transplantation has been established as a useful therapy for hematologic malignancies and some solid tumors. Some patients, however, still die in allogeneic SCT because T lymphocytes cause fatal GVHD and many are not cured in autologous SCT because disease recurs post-SCT. Disease may recur because the tumor was not completely eliminated or because the stem cell component was contaminated with tumor cells that home to sites of prior disease. For these reasons, manipulated or engineered stem cell grafts continue to attract interest. Approaches to graft engineering include methods of T-cell depletion designed to minimize GVHD without compromising the potential for graft-versus-disease effect, as well as purging with monoclonal antibodies or selection of CD34 stem cells in order to eliminate contaminating tumor cells. However, to date, no form of engineered graft has shown itself to be superior to unmanipulated components with respect to survival in phase III trials in autologous SCT or allogeneic HLA identical SCT. In allogeneic-related HLA haploidentical SCT, it is generally agreed that T-cell depletion is required to reduce the risk of acute GVHD. With the apparent superiority of mobilized allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells over bone marrow in a recent large trial, and the promise of minimally myeloablative allogeneic SCT using PBSC, continued success with unmanipulated components is likely to continue. Nevertheless, should the CR rates for autologous SCT in NHL, HD, and MM increase due to advances in treatment, such as the use of new agents or of post-SCT tumor vaccines, the role of tumor cell contamination of stem cell components in disease recurrence post-SCT will likely increase as well. The applications of cytotherapies will evolve and expand over the coming decades. Hematopoietic stem cell transplants may provide methods for inducing lifelong tolerance to xenografts or allow novel treatment of autoimmune diseases, whereas the discovery
and use of nonhematopoietic stem cells may help minimize the toxicities of cancer therapy or cure nonmalignant disorders. For example, the infusion of fetal islet cell progenitors may provide a treatment for severe diabetes. The future of stem cell transplantation and cytotherapies in general will require advances in our understanding of stem cell biology and transplantation immunology and will continue to depend on patients courageous enough to participate in well-designed clinical trials.
Bibliography
Anderson, J. E., and Thomas, E. D. (1997). The Seattle experience with bone marrow transplantation for myelodysplasia. Leukemia Res. 21S1, 51a. Appelbaum, F. R. (1997). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Semin. Oncol. 24, 114123. Apperley, J. F. (1998). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 5, 445453. Attal, M., et al. (1996). A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 9197. Aversa, F., et al. (1998). Treatment of high-risk acute leukemia with T-cell-depleted stem cells from related donors with one fully mismatched HLA haplotype. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 11861193. Bensinger, W., et al. (1999). A prospective, randomised trial of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or marrow (BM) for patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Blood 94, 368a. Buckley, R., et al. (1999). Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of severe combined immunodeciency. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 508516. Cassileth, P., et al. (1998). Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in rst remission. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 149156. Comenzo, R. L. (2000). Hematopoietic cell transplantation for primary systemic amyloidosis: What have we learned. Leukemia Lymphoma 37, 245258.
S T E M C E L L T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N
263
Comenzo, R., et al. (1998). Dose intensive melphalan with blood stem cell support for the treatment of AL amyloidosis: Survival and responses in 25 patients. Blood 91, 36623670. Dazzi, F., Szydlo, R., and Goldman, J. (1999). Donor lymphocyte infusions for relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after a stem cell transplant: Where we now stand. Exp. Hematol. 27, 14771486. Gluckman, E., et al. (1997). Outcome of cord-blood transplantation form related and unrelated donors. N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 378381. Good, R. A. (1987). Bone marrow transplantation for immunodeciency diseases. J. Med. Sci. 294, 6871. Kyle, R. A. (1999). High-dose therapy in multiple myeloma and primary amyloidosis: An overview. Semin. Oncol. 26, 7483. Moore, M. A. (1999). Turning brain into blood: Clinical applications of stem-cell research in neurobiology and hematology. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 605. Moskowitz, C., et al. (1999). The International Prognostic Index predicts for outcome following autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed and primary refractory intermediate-grade lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 23, 561567.
Nimer, S., et al. (1994). Selective depletion of CD8 cells for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation: A randomized controlled trial. Transplantation 57, 8287. Shpall, E. J. (1999). The utilization of cytokines in stem cell mobilization strategies. Bone Marrow Transplant 23S2, 1319. Stadtmauer, E., et al. (2000). Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 10691077. Thomas, E. D. (1999). Does bone marrow transplantation confer a normal life span)? N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 50. Thomas, E. D., Blume, K., and Forman, S. (1999). Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, 2nd Ed. Blackwell, Oxford. Vescio, R., et al. (1999). Multicenter phase III trial to evaluate CD34 selected versus unselected autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Blood 15, 18581868. Weissman, I. (2000). Translating stem and progenitor cell biology to the clinic: Barriers and opportunities. Science 281, 14421446.