REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10TH FLOOR LANSING

CITY HALL 124 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE AGENDA FOR JULY 25, 2011

TO THE HON. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: The following items were listed on the agenda in the City Clerk's Office by 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 21, 2011, in accordance with Section 3-103(2) of the City Charter and will be ready for your consideration at the regular meeting of the City Council on Monday, July 25, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers, 10th Floor, City Hall.
I. II. III. ROLL CALL MEDITATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE READING AND APPROVAL OF PRINTED COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS

Approval of the Printed Council Proceedings of July 11, 2011

IV. CONSIDERATION OF LATE ITEMS

(Suspension of Council Rule #9 is needed to allow consideration of late items. Late items will be considered as part of the regular portion of the meeting to which they relate.)
TABLED ITEMS SPECIAL CEREMONIES

V. VI.

1.
VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII.

Tribute; Declaring Monday, July 25, 2011 as Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing

COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY CLERK COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS

(Time, place, purpose, or definition of

event 1 minute limit)

SPEAKER REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS MAYORS COMMENTS SHOW CAUSE HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS (Legislative matters consist of the

following items on the agenda: public hearings, resolutions, ordinances for introduction, and ordinances for passage. The public may comment for up to three minutes. Speakers must sign up on white form.)

A.

SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS

1.

In consideration of an ordinance of the City of Lansing to add Chapter 1285 to the Lansing Codified Ordinances to Require and Encourage Provision of Bicycle Parking

XIII.

COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATIVE MATTERS A. B. REFERRAL OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSENT AGENDA

1.

BY COUNCIL MEMBERS KATHIE DUNBAR, ERIC HEWITT, TINA HOUGHTON, BRIAN JEFFRIES, DERRICK QUINNEY, ALYNNE ROBINSON AND JESSICA YORKO a. Tribute; In recognition of New Mount Calvary Baptist Churchs 47th Anniversary

2.

BY COUNCIL MEMBER JESSICA YORKO a. Tribute; Declaring Monday, July 25, 2011 as Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing

3.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING a. b. c. Act-2-2011;. Construction of Lansing 2011 Federal Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) Waverly Road Pathway Act-5-2010; Conveyance of Easement on LBWL Riverfront Property to AT&T SLU-2-2011; 1122 W. Holmes Road, request by Esteban Chavez to utilize property located at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3 (Logan Shopping Center) for a Church

4.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES a. Confirmation of Appointment of Edwina Marshall to the Human Relations and Community Services Board for a 1st Ward Term to Expire June 30, 2013 Appropriation of Community Funding to Lansing for Cesar E. Chavez for its Latino/Tejano Showcase to be held September 10, 2011

b.

5.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS a. Confirmation of Appointment of Anthony McCloud to the Board of Water and Light Board of Commissioners for a 3rd Ward Term to Expire June 30, 2015

6.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS a. b. Workers Compensation Claim #2011768MLM10 2011-2013 Principal Shopping District Special Assessment

C. D. E.

RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION REPORTS FROM COUNCIL COMMITTEES ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION and Setting of Public Hearings

1.

BY COUNCIL MEMBER JEFFRIES, CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING a. Introduction of Z-1-2011; 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoning the property at this location from "DM-3" Residential District to "D-1" Professional Office District to allow the building at this location to be used for administrative offices for the Neogen Corporation, and setting a Public Hearing for August 22, 2011 Introduction of Z-2-2011; 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoning the property at this location from "J" Parking District to "F" Commercial District to allow for future construction of a building on the area of the site that is currently zoned J Parking, and setting a Public Hearing for August 22, 2011 Introduction of an Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and setting a Public Hearing for August 8, 2011

b.

c.

F.

ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE

1.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES a. Adoption of an ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to add Chapter 876 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances establishing a procedure for recognition of a Service Organization, as described by MCL 432.103(k)(ii) Adoption of an Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 805 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by eliminating the requirement that each auction held in the city be separately licensed

b.

2.

BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES a. Adoption of an Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 1046 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by making changes approved by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and required by Federal Law

XIV. XV.

SPEAKER REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON CITY GOVERNMENT RELATED MATTERS REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS; COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS; AND OTHER CITY RELATED MATTERS (Motion that all items be

considered as being read in full and that the proper referrals be made by the President)
1. REPORTS FROM CITY OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS

a. b.

Letter from the City Clerk submitting Minutes of Boards and Authorities placed on file in the City Clerks Office Letter(s) from the Mayor re: i. Floodplain Development Management; Designating an Enforcing Agency and Designating Regulated Flood Hazard Areas

2.

COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, AND OTHER CITY RELATED MATTERS

a.

Letter from the State of Michigan Liquor Control Commission providing 15-Day notice of an application from Golden Temple, Inc. requesting to Transfer Ownership of 2011 Specially Designated Distributor (SDD) and Specially Designated Merchant (SDM) licensed business located at 815 W. Edgewood Blvd., Suite B from I&J, Inc. Letter from Mary Sabaj, Ingham/Lansing Community Corrections Manager regarding Fiscal Year 2012 State Funding Application, Michigan Department of Corrections and Sub-Contracts for Community Corrections Programs Letter from the Historical Society of Greater Lansing regarding the establishment of a local historical museum Letter from the Lansing Neighborhood Council in support of an Application for Community Funding submitted by Wexford Montessori School PTA for its Community Celebration to be held August 27, 2011 Letter from Kyle Vandecar of 630 Hillcrest Ave., East Lansing in response to a Snow and Ice Removal Assessment for Winter 2010-11 for property located at 650 Louisa St.

b.

c. d.

e.

XVI.

MOTION OF EXCUSED ABSENCE

XVII. REMARKS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS XVIII. REMARKS BY THE MAYOR OR EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT XIX. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CITY GOVERNMENT RELATED MATTERS (City government

related matters are issues or topics relevant to the operation or governance of the city. The public may comment for up to three minutes. Speakers must sign up on yellow form.)
XX. ADJOURNMENT

CHRIS SWOPE, CITY CLERK

Persons with disabilities who need an accommodation to fully participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerks Office at (517) 483-4131 (TDD (517) 483-4479). 24 hour notice may be needed for certain accommodations. An attempt will be made to grant all reasonable accommodation requests.

CITY OF LANSING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held on Monday, July 25, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th Floor Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering an Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Add Chapter 1285 to the Lansing Codified Ordinances to require and encourage provision of bicycle parking. For more information please call 483-4177. Interested Persons are invited to attend this Public Hearing CHRIS SWOPE, LANSING CITY CLERK

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN, TO ADD CHAPTER

3 1285 OF THE LANSING CODIFIED ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE AND ENCOURAGE 4 PROVISION OF BICYCLE PARKING. 5 6 THE CITY OF LANSING ORDAINS: Section 1. That Chapter 1285 be and is hereby added to the Codified Ordinances of the

7 City of Lansing, Michigan, to read as follows: 8 CHAPTER 1285. BICYCLE PARKING 9 1285.01. DEFINITIONS 10 FOR PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER: 11 A PBP GUIDELINES MEANS THE 2ND EDITION OF THE BICYCLE PARKING

12 GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE 13 PROFESSIONALS. 14 BICY CLE LOCKER MEANS A LOCKED COMPARTMENT FOR THE STORAGE OF A

15 SINGLE BICYCLE. 16 BICY CLE PA RKING SPA CE MEANS A SECURE STRUCTURE DESIGNED AND

17 AVAILABLE EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE STORAGE OF A BICYCLE. 18 BICY CLE ROOM MEANS A LOCKED ROOM USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE STORAGE

19 OF BICYCLES, WITH ACCESS LIMITED TO USERS OF BICYCLES TO BE STORED IN 20 THE ROOM.

21

LONG-TERM BICY CLE PA RKING SPA CE MEANS A BICYCLE PARKING SPACE THAT

22 IS COVERED AND ENCLOSED ON ALL FOUR SIDES.

1
C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-1.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 SHORT-TERM BICY CLE PA RKING SPA CE MEANS ANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACE 2 THAT IS NOT A LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE. 3 1285.02. REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY 5 STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 1285.04 OR SECTION 1285.05 FOR WHICH, 6 AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE, A SITE PLAN MUST BE 7 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING OFFICE. 8 1285.03. BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES 9 (a) TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE AND UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THIS 10 CHAPTER, PROPERTY OWNERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONFORM TO THE APBP 11 GUIDELINES, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING OFFICE. 12 (b) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: 13 (1) DURING THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN 14 SECTIONS 1285.04 AND 1285.05, BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THIS 15 CHAPTER SHALL BE LIT AT AN ILLUMINATION LEVEL OF AT LEAST .4 16 FOOTCANDLES. 17 (2) BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF AN 18 ENTRANCE TO THE STRUCTURE. 19 (3) BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE ADEQUATELY MAINTAINED AND KEPT 20 FREE OF MUD, DEBRIS, ICE, AND SNOW. 21 (c) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, EACH 22 SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THE 23 PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER MUST SUPPORT A BICYCLE IN AN UPRIGHT

2
C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE--l.LAN\LOCALS-l\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 POSITION; ALLOW BOTH THE BICYCLE FRAME AND THE FRONT WHEEL TO BE 2 LOCKED; BE SECURELY ANCHORED TO A HARD SURFACE, SUCH AS ASPHALT, 3 CONCRETE, OR BRICK PAVERS, MEASURING AT LEAST 6 FEET BY 2 FEET; AND BE 4 CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS THAT RESIST CUTTING, RUSTING, BENDING, AND 5 DEFORMATION. 6 (d) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, LONG7 TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 8 THIS CHAPTER MUST BE PROVIDED IN (1) BICYCLE LOCKERS THAT ENSURE 9 ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR SIMULTANEOUS USERS; (2) BICYCLE RACKS IN 10 LOCKED CAGES; OR (3) BICYCLE ROOMS. 11 (e) THE FOLLOWING BICYCLE RACK STYLES, AS DESCRIBED IN THE 12 RECOMMENDED RACKS AND ACCEPTABLE RACKS SECTIONS OF THE APBP 13 GUIDELINES, SATISFY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER FOR THE SPECIFIED 14 NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES: 15 (1) EACH INVERTED U BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 2 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. 16 (2) EACH POST AND RING BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 2 BICYCLE PARKING 17 SPACES. 18 (3) EACH WALL-MOUNTED BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE PARKING 19 SPACE. 20 (4) EACH WHEELWELL-SECURED BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE PARKING 21 SPACE PER WHEELWELL. 22 (5) EACH MODIFIED COATHANGER BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE 23 PARKING SPACE PER MODIFIED COATHANGER.

3
C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-1.LAN\LOCALS-4\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLEPARKING 1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 (6) EACH TWO-TI KR OR DOUBLE DECKER BICYCLE RACK PROVIDES 1 BICYCLE 2 PARKING SPACE PER TRAY. 3 1285.04. BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON LAND USE 4 (a) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION: 5 (1) EVERY 24 INCHES OF BENCH SEATING SHALL BE COUNTED AS ONE SEAT. 6 (2) NUMBERS RESULTING FROM THE PRESCRIBED FORMULAS SHALL BE 7 ROUNDED UP FROM 1A TO THE NEXT WHOLE NUMBER IN CALCULATING THE 8 NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. 9 (b) NO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE G-1 BUSINESS DISTRICT 10 UNLESS OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED, IN WHICH CASE A 11 NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES EQUAL TO 5% OF THE NUMBER OF OFF12 STREET PARKING SPACES, WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES, 13 IS REQUIRED. IN ALL OTHER DISTRICTS, PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PROVIDE 14 THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR THE BENEFIT OF 15 THE CORRESPONDING SPECIFIED STRUCTURES: REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 2 FOR EVERY 10 DWELLING UNITS 2 FOR EVERY 50 SEATS IN THE MAIN UNIT OF WORSHIP 2 FOR EVERY 50 UNITS 2 FOR EVERY 500 SQUARE FEET OF USABLE FLOOR AREA, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 3 0

STRUCTURE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL CHURCHES LODGING ATHLETIC CLUBS AND FITNESS CENTERS LIBRARIES AND MUSEUMS PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS AND SHOPPING CENTERS RETAIL STORES NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS'
rnrnTr inr nr,
A

irrr\Tr r

A T nT

r1rnQ QT(^^T A T Q U

AT T TTT

4
C:\DOCUME-4\KREEVE4l.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise \BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011

CLINICS, AND MEDICAL CENTERS GAS STATIONS SPORTS ARENAS AND STADIUMS THEATERS AND AUDITORIUMS EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS OFFICES NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED 2 FOR EVERY 250 SEATS, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30 2 FOR EVERY 100 SEATS, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30 2 FOR EVERY 24 SEATS 2 FOR EVERY 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF USABLE FLOOR AREA, WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 2 FOR EVERY 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF USABLE FLOOR AREA, WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 2 FOR EVERY 20 VEHICLE PARKING SPACES, WITH A . MAXIMUM OF 30 2 FOR EVERY 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF USABLE FLOOR AREA, WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 AND A MAXIM UM OF 30 2 .FOR EVERY 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 10

INDUSTRIAL, MANUFACTURING, WHOLESALE, AND RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENTS

COMMERCIAL OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES

CONSUMER REPAIR SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS

CEMETERIES, MAUSOLEUMS, AND PARKS

1
2 1285.05. LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 3 EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSIT 4 5 (a) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, NUMBERS RESULTING FROM THE 6 PRESCRIBED FORMULAS SHALL BE ROUNDED UP FROM
%2

TO THE NEXT WHOLE

7 NUMBER IN CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED LONG-TERM BICYCLE 8 PARKING SPACES.

9 (b) NO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE G-1 BUSINESS

10 DISTRICT. IN ALL OTHER DISTRICTS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIREMENTS 11 IMPOSED BY SECTION 1285.04, PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PROVIDE THE

5
C:\DOCUME-1\KREEVE-I.LAN\LOCALS-1\ Temp \XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 FOLLOWING NUMBER OF LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR THE 2 BENEFIT OF THE CORRESPONDING SPECIFIED STRUCTURES: 3 (1) STRUCTURES IN WHICH MORE THAN 40 EMPLOYEES WORK AT ANY GIVEN 4 TIME: 2 FOR EVERY 40 EMPLOYEES. 5 (2) BUS STATIONS: 2 FOR EVERY BUS BAY. 6 1285.06. ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES TO OFFSET REQUIRED OFF7 STREET PARKING SPACES 8 9 THE NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 1284 10 WILL BE REDUCED BY ONE SPACE, WITH A MAXIMUM REDUCTION OF 20% OF 11 THE NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 1284, 12 FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: 13 (a) EVERY 6 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IN EXCESS OF THOSE 14 REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER; 15 (b) EVERY 6 BICYCLE PARING SPACES COVERED BY A PERMANENT STRUCTURE 16 APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR IN EXCESS OF THE NUMBER OF 17 LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER. 18 1285.07. WAIVERS 19 (a) A PROPERTY OWNER MAY SEEK A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 20 THIS SECTION BY SUBMITTING A WRITTEN APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF 21 ZONING APPEALS. THE APPLICATION MUST: 22 (1) IDENTIFY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 23 (A) A DEMONSTRABLE FINANCIAL BURDEN THAT WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY 24 IMPAIR THE PROPERTY OWNER'S FINANCIAL ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT OR 25 STRUCTURALLY ALTER THE STRUCTURE; OR 6
C:\DOCUME-l \KREEVE--l.LAN\LOCALS-l \Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 (B) MEASURABLE AND DEMONSTRABLE LACK OF DEMAND FOR THE BICYCLE 2 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THIS CHAPTER, AS DEMONSTRATED BY A 3 CONSUMER SURVEY OR OTHER METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE ZONING 4 ADMINISTRATOR. 5 (2) IDENTIFY THE EXTENT TO WHICH, AND THE MANNER IN WHICH, THE 6 PROPERTY OWNER IS CAPABLE OF AND WILLING TO FULFILL THE OBJECTIVES 7 OF THIS CHAPTER BY PARTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS REQUIREMENTS OR ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FULFILLING ITS OBJECTIVES. 9 (b) UPON RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 SUBSECTION (a), THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS SHALL EITHER GRANT OR 11 DENY THE WAIVER, INCLUDING ANY CONDITIONS FOR PARTIAL COMPLIANCE. 12 IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO GRANT OR DENY THE WAIVER OR GRANT THE 13 WAIVER SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION OF PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, THE BOARD OF 14 ZONING APPEALS SHALL CONSIDER WHETHER THE APPLICANT HAS 15 DEMONSTRATED, TO HIS OR HER SATISFACTION, ONE OF THE BASES FOR A 16 WAIVER REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (a)(1); THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE 17 APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED GOOD FAITH BY OFFERING PARTIAL 18 COMPLIANCE OR ALTERNATIVES PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (a)(2); THE 19 CHARACTER OF THE STRUCTURE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS; AND THE IMPACT OF 20 THE WAIVER ON THE CHARACTER OF THE STRUCTURE'S SURROUNDINGS AND 21 OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY. 22 1285.08. DOWNTOWN BICYCLE PARKING PLAN

7 C:\DOCUME-l\KREEVE-l.LAN\LOCALS -1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

Draft #1.6 March 29, 2011 1 THE PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT IS ENCOURAGED TO INCLUDE A BICYCLE 2 PARKING PLAN FOR THE G-1 BUSINESS DISTRICT IN ITS [ ]. 3 Section 2. All ordinances, resolutions or rules, parts of ordinances, resolutions or rules

4 inconsistent with the provisions hereof are hereby repealed. 5 Section 3. Should any section, clause or phrase of this ordinance be declared to be

6 invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof 7 8 other than the part so declared to be invalid. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect on the 30th day after enactment, unless given

9 immediate effect by City Council. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

8
C:\DOCUME-l\KREEVE-l.LAN\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\BICYCLE PARKING_1285 D.doc

P'j

BY COUNCILMEMBER A'LYNNE ROBINSON, KATHIE DUNBAR, ERIC HEWITT, TINA HOUGHTON, BRIAN JEFFRIES, DERRICK QUINNEY, JESSICA YORKO RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, New Mount Calvary Baptist Church held its first service on August 16, 1964, at the YWCA at 217 Townsend Street in Lansing, Michigan; and WHEREAS, throughout their history, they have had three Pastors; Reverend Ferdinand S. Fritz, Reverend Columbus Clayton, and Reverend Dr. Lonnie J. Chipp; and WHEREAS, Reverend Fritz was Pastor from August 12, 1964 until his passing on December 20, 1984, basing his ministry on teaching and discipleship, developing the Urban Center for Continuing Education and Counseling where he regularly taught classes in Lansing and Muskegon; and WHEREAS, after Reverend Fritz' passing in 1984, the Church continued without a pastor. Reverend Columbus Clayton assumed the pastorate on October 27, 1985 and remained Pastor until his resignation on December 22, 2007; and WHEREAS, as Pastor, Reverend Clayton promoted community involvement, and developing new preachers; he was President of the Pastor Conference, and was the driving force in the building of the current edifice and the church's third and final relocation; and WHEREAS, when Reverend Clayton left the parish, it would be almost two years again before the Church had a pastor; and WHEREAS, Reverend Dr. Lonnie J. Chipp was named Pastor in late 2009, bringing renewed vitality and interest in evangelism, discipleship, and focusing on meeting the holistic needs of the church body and the community; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby, wishes to congratulate New Mount Calvary Baptist Church on their 47 th Anniversary. We wish you continued success!

BY COUNCILMEMBER JESSICA YORKO RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, the Power of We Consortium AmeriCorps State members mobilize thousands of volunteers each year in projects that create a more healthy, inclusive environment for Ingham County residents; and WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members teach children and adults how to eat healthier through nutrition education, cooking demonstrations, and school gardens; and WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members encourage exercising by promoting active transportation, improving the non-motorized transportation environment, and hosting educational events; and WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members support local projects that increase Lansing area residents' access to healthy food, such as community gardens, farmers markets, community supported agriculture, and gleaning programs; and WHEREAS, the Consortium AmeriCorps members create and expand environmental stewardship programs at our parks and nature centers; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby, wishes to proclaim July 25, 2011, Power of We AmeriCorps Day in the City of Lansing and to thank the Power of We Consortium, Michigan Community Service Commission, and their volunteers for their dedication and service to the city of Lansing and its residents. We wish you success in the future!

BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING Act-2-11, Lansing 2011 CMAQ Waverly Road Pathway WHEREAS, the Lansing Public Service Department requests authorization to construct the Lansing 2011 CMAQ Waverly Road Pathway project, which is funded on an 80/20 basis through the Federal Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) program; and WHEREAS, this project is part of a series of four connected projects in an intergovernmental effort to make nonmotorized travel more accessible to the southwest section of Lansing; and WHEREAS, the project involves the construction of a non-motorized path along the ease side of Waverly Road between Starlight Lane and Cooley Drive, and acquisition of portions of six parcels to provide right-of-way for this path; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met with property owners and residents along proposed pathway, and has coordinated with affected agencies, including the Board of Water and Light, Consumers Energy, AT&T, fiber optic providers, Parks & Recreation-Forestry, Public Service-Operations & Maintenance, and CATA; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the Planning Board reviewed the location, character, and extent of the proposal in accordance with its Act 33 Review procedures and found that: bicycle travel along Waverly Road is currently close to impossible due to the high volume of vehicular traffic, the project is consistent with the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission "Regional Long Range Transportation Plan 2035" and Lansing's Complete Streets Ordinance, The project provide bicycle transportation opportunities to southwest Lansing, including the properties along the corridor, The essential character of the neighborhood will be unchanged, and the proposed acquisitions are necessary and appropriate to complete the project; and WHEREAS, the Board voted unanimously (4-0) to recommend approval of Act-2-11, to acquire portions of six parcels and to construct a non-motorized path along the east side of Waverly Road between Starlight Lane and Cooley Drive; and WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Planning Board and concurs therewith; WHEREAS, all property values were based on based on the land values contained in the Assessor's records and confirmed with the City Assessor; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lansing City Council hereby approves Act-2-11, Lansing 2011 CMAQ Waverly Road Pathway, and to acquire portions of six parcels, legally described as: Portion of 2505 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-151-001) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel, then east 9.0', south 104.95', west 9.0' and north 104.95' to the point of beg nning, an area of approximately 945 square feet, in the amount of $6180.00, i Portion of 2515 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-151-011) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 17.0', south 148.5', west 17.0' and north 148.5' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 2525 square feet, in the amount of $3700.00, Portion of 2615 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-153-021) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 165.0', west 6.0' and north 165.0' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 990 square feet, in the amount of $1,200.00, Portion of 3017 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-303-031) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 22.0', south 15.0', west 20.0', south 172.0', west 12.0' and north 187.0' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 2544 square feet, in the amount of $6,100.00,

Portion of 3101 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-351-001) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 120.0', west 6.0' and north 120.0' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 720 square feet, in the amount of $1,275.00, Portion of 3301 S. Waverly Road (33-01-01-30-351-081) Beginning at the northwest corner of the parcel then east 6.0', south 165.0', west 6.0' and north 165.0' to the point of beginning, an area of approximately 990 square feet, in the amount of $2,400.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor, on behalf of the City, is hereby authorized to sign and execute all documents necessary to effectuate the aforementioned transaction(s), subject to their prior approval as to content and form by the City Attorney, and take all steps necessary to complete the project.

RESOLUTION # BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING Act-5-10, Conveyance of Easement on LBWL Riverfront Property (PPN 33-01-01-23126-070) to AT&T

RE:

WHEREAS, the Lansing Board of Water and Light requests that the City convey an easement to AT&T for existing and future communication facilities on LBWL property; and WHEREAS, the property is located on the Red Cedar River, north of Crego Park and south of the 1-496 ramp to US 127, and is bisected by a CSX railroad ROW; and WHEREAS, the Rivertrail is located on the north shore of the Red Cedar, on the south edge of the parcel; and WHEREAS, the requested easement is "L"-shaped, running in a N-S direction with the Francis Street ROW (extended), and jutting southeasterly to the Red Cedar River, all north of the CSX ROW; and WHEREAS, the easement contains language that protects a well located on the property, and has been revised to address early concerns about protecting the Rivertrail; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the location, character, and extent of the proposed easement in accordance with its Act 285 Review procedures, and found that: 1. 2. 3. the requested easement is necessary and appropriate for continuation, service, and possible expansion of AT&T service to the Lansing area, the proposed easement will not interfere with the LBWL use of the property or the Rivertrail, the easement language protects the City from damage to its water supply and the Rivertrail; and

WHEREAS, the Lansing Planning Board, at its meeting on May 3, 2011, voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of Act-5-10, the request by the Board of Water and Light to grant AT&T an overhead utility easement; WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Planning Board and concurs therewith; and WHEREAS, the proposed conveyance provides that the property is currently used for the River Walk and kept open for public park purposes, that AT&T shall take no action which would obstruct the public park use of the property, specifically including ingress and egress, that no cell towers will be build on the easement area, and that the grantor must give prior approval to trim or remove trees, vegetation, or landscaping. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approves Act-510, and authorizes the conveyance of an easement on Board of Water & Light property located on the Red Cedar River, north of Crego Park and south of the 1-496 ramp to US 127 (PPN 3301-01-23-126-070) to AT&T for the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), said easement legally described as:

Easement Area No. 1 A one rod (16.5 foot) wide area centered on the following described overhead communications line: Beginning on the north line of the Property at a point that is 302 feet, more or less, westerly of the N.E. corner of the Property; thence S 01 W 99.5 feet, more or less, to a utility pole (Point A); thence continuing S 01 W 75.5 feet, more or less, to a utility pole; thence S 6640' E 39 feet, more or less, to a utility pole (Point B); thence S 7450' E 157 feet, more or less, to the S.E. side of the Property (also being at the N.W. edge of the Red Cedar River).. Easement Area No. 2 A one rod (16.5 foot) wide area centered on the following described overhead communications line: Beginning at Point A (a utility pole) described above; thence S 2045' E 97 feet, more or less, to Point B (a utility pole) described above. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the administration, on behalf of the City, is hereby authorized to sign and execute all documents to complete these transactions, subject to prior approval as to form by the City Attorney.

BY THE COMMITTEE OF DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING SLU-2-2011 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3 Church in the "F" Commercial District WHEREAS, the applicant, Esteban R. Chavez, has requested a Special Land Use permit (SLU2-2011) to establish a church in the building at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3 (Logan Shopping Center); and WHEREAS, the property is zoned "F" Commercial District, where churches are permitted subject to obtaining a special land use permit; and WHEREAS, a review was completed by staff evaluating the character, location and impact this proposal would have on the surrounding area and the impact on the environment, utilities, services and compliance with the Zoning Code and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on May 3, 2011, at which the applicant spoke in favor of the request and no other comments were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board (based upon testimony, evidence and the staff report) at its May 3, 2011 meeting, voted (5-0) to recommend approval of SLU-2-2011 to permit a church at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing regarding SLU-2-2011 on July 7, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Committee on Development and Planning has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Planning Board and concurs therewith; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approves SLU-22011 to establish a church at 1122 W. Holmes Road, Suite 3, with the condition that the applicant agrees, in writing, that it will not object to the issuance of liquor licenses on or within 500 feet of the property on which the church is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Special Land Use permit shall remain in effect only so long as the petitioner fully complies with this resolution, and if the petitioner fails to comply, the Special Land Use permit may be terminated by City Council Resolution. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that in granting this request, the City Council determines the following: 1. 2. 3. The proposed church is compatible with the essential character of the surrounding area, as designed. The proposed church will not change the essential character of the surrounding area. The proposed church will not interfere with the general enjoyment of adjacent properties.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

The proposed church will not impact adjacent properties as it will not be detrimental to the use or character of the property under consideration. The proposed church will not impact the health, safety and welfare of persons or property in the surrounding area. The proposed church can be adequately served by essential public facilities and services. The proposed church will not place any demands on public services and facilities in excess of current capacities. The proposed church is consistent with the intent and purposes of the Zoning Code and the Southwest Area Comprehensive plan. The proposed church will comply with the requirements of the "F" Commercial District.

DRAFT
BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, the Mayor made the appointment of Edwina Marshall as a First Ward Member of Human Relations and Community Service to Expire June 30, 2013 WHEREAS, the Committee on General Services met on July 18, 2011 and took affirmative action; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby confirms the appointment of Edwina Marshall as a First Ward Member of Human Relations and Community Service to Expire June 30, 2013

DRAFT

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

BY THE COMMITTEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, the Mayor made the appointment of Anthony McCloud of 3708 Glasgow Drive, Lansing, MI 48911to the Third Ward Position on the Board of Water and Light Board of Commissioners for a term to Expire June 30, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Relations Committee met on July 25, 2011 and took affirmative action; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council, hereby confirms the appointment of Anthony McCloud of 3708 Glasgow Drive, Lansing, MI 48911 to the Third Ward Position on the Board of Water and Light Board of Commissioners for a term to Expire June 30, 2015.

D AFT

BY THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, the City of Lansing is named as defendant in a workers' compensation action, 2011768MLM10, involving alleged work related injuries/illnesses; WHEREAS, it is proposed that the action be resolved by virtue of entering into a settlement agreement, in which, the City of Lansing would agree to pay Plaintiff the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) in exchange for a complete redemption and release of the City from any past, present, and future liability regarding any alleged injuries/illnesses whatsoever; WHEREAS, the proposed settlement is recommended by the Mayor, the Department of Human Resources, the City of Lansing's Fund Administrator, and the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lansing City Council hereby approves payment of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) pursuant to said proposed settlement agreement as a full and final settlement of said action. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Law Department is authorized to prepare and execute the requisite documents to complete settlement of the aforementioned lawsuit.

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

Es4

R FT
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE Council Member Jeffries, Chair of the Committee on Development and Planning introduced: An ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, providing for the rezoning of a parcel of real property located in the City of Lansing, Michigan, and for the revision of the district maps adopted by Section 1246.02 of the Code of Ordinances. Property identified as: Z-1-2011, 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoning from "DM-3" Residential district to "D-1" Professional Office district The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning. BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING Resolved by the City Council of the City of Lansing that a public hearing be set for Monday, August 22, 2011, at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Tenth Floor, Lansing City Hall, 124 West Michigan Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, for the purpose of approving and/or opposing the Ordinance for rezoning: Z-1-2011, 601 N. Pennsylvania Avenue, rezoning from "DM-3" Residential district to "D-1" Professional Office district

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE Council Member Jeffries, Chair of the Committee on Development and Planning introduced: An ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, providing for the rezoning of a parcel of real property located in the City of Lansing, Michigan, and for the revision of the district maps adopted by Section 1246.02 of the Code of Ordinances. Property identified as: Z-2-2011, Part of 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoning from "J" Parking District to "F" Commercial District The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning. BY THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING Resolved by the City Council of the City of Lansing that a public hearing be set for Monday, August 22, 2011, at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Tenth Floor, Lansing City Hall, 124 West Michigan Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, for the purpose of approving and/or opposing the Ordinance for rezoning: Z-2-2011, Part of 2331 N. Larch Street, rezoning from "J" Parking District to "F" Commercial District

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

Sri c
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE Council Member Jeffries, Chair of the Committee on Development and Planning introduced: An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972 as amended The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING By Council Member Jeffries RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LANSING, that a public hearing be set for Monday, August 8, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th Floor Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering an Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972 as amended. Interested Persons are invited to attend this Public Hearing

ORDINANCE ADDRESSING FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS OF THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE City of Lansing, Ingham County, MI Ordinance number
An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended. The City of Lansing ordains: Section 1. AGENCY DESIGNATED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state construction code, in accordance with Section 8b(6) of Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, the Building Official of the City of Lansing is hereby designated as the enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, State of Michigan. The City of Lansing assumes responsibility for the administration and enforcement of said Act through out the corporate limits of the community adopting this ordinance. Section 2. CODE APPENDIX ENFORCED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state construction code, in accordance with Section 8b(6) of Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, Appendix G of the Michigan Building Code shall be enforced by the enforcing agency within the City of Lansing. Section 3. DESIGNATION OF REGULATED FLOOD PRONE HAZARD AREAS. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Entitled "Ingham County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)" and dated 8/16/11 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) (FIRMS) panel number(s) of 26065C; 0013D, 0014D, 0018D, 0020D, 0108D, 0126D, 0127D, 0128D, 0129D, 0131D, 0132D, 0133D, 0134D, 0136D, 0137D, 0139D, 0141D, 0142D, 0143D, 0144D, 0151D, 0153D, 0154D, 0161D, 0162D, and 0170D dated 8/16/11 are adopted by reference for the purposes of administration of the Michigan Construction Code, and declared to

be a part of Section 1612.3 of the Michigan Building Code, and to provide the content of the "Flood Hazards" section of Table R301.2(1) of the Michigan Residential Code. Section 4. REPEALS. All ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. PUBLICATION. This ordinance shall be effective after legal publication and in accordance with the provisions of the Act governing same. Adopted this (Year). This ordinance duly adopted on (Date) at a regular meeting of the (Name of Adopting Body) and will become effective (Date). Signed on (Date) by (Printed/Typed Name), Clerk of the (County, City, Village, or Township) of (Name of Unit of Government). Attested on (Date) by (Printed/Typed Name) Title: Chair, Mayor, Supervisor, or President of the (County, City, Village, or Township) of (Name of Unit of Government). (Signature), (Signature), (Date) day of (Month),

NFIP MI MOD ORD non-computer fill-in, UPDATED 4/5/2011

PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE An. Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to add Chapter 876 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances establishing a procedure for recognition of a Service Organization, as described by MCL 432.103(k)(ii) Is read a second time by its title. The Ordinance was reported from the Committee on General Services and is on the order of immediate passage. By Council Member Quinney

COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR HEWITT HOUGHTON JEFFRIES QUINNEY ROBINSON WOOD YORKO

YEAS

NAYS

ADOPTED

FAILED

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

Zit

PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 805 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by eliminating the requirement that each auction held in the city be separately licensed Is read a second time by its title. The Ordinance was reported from the Committee on General Services and is on the order of immediate passage. By Council Member Quinney

COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR HEWITT HOUGHTON JEFFRIES QUINNEY ROBINSON WOOD YORKO

YEAS

NAYS

ADOPTED

FAILED

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

ray
PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Lansing, Michigan, to Amend Chapter 1046 of the Lansing Codified Ordinances by making changes approved by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and required by Federal Law Is read a second time by its title. The Ordinance was reported from the Committee on General Services and is on the order of immediate passage. By Council Member Yorko

COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR HEWITT HOUGHTON JEFFRIES QUINNEY ROBINSON WOOD YORKO

YEAS

NAYS

ADOPTED

FAILED

THIS ITEM NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINT

Chris Swope

Lansing City Clerk

July 22, 2011 President Robinson and Members of the Lansing City Council 10th Floor City Hall Lansing, MI 48933 Dear President Robinson and Council Members: The Minutes from the Meetings of the following Boards and Authorities of the City of Lansing were placed on file in the City Clerk's Office and are attached for your information and review. BOARD NAME Board of Public Service Employees' Retirement System Board of Trustees DATE OF MEETING June 9, 2011 June 23, 2011

If my staff or I can provide further assistance or information relative to the filing of these minutes, please contact us at 483-4131.

CIs Swope, CIVIC Lansing City Clerk

Lansing City Clerk's Office Ninth Floor, City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI 48933-1695 517-483-4131 517-377-0068 FAX www.lansingmi.gov/clerk clerk@lansingmi.gov

REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF PUBLIC SERVICE JUNE 9, 2011

PRESENT: ABSENT: STAFF: Paul Baerman, Ron Bloomberg, Dale Copedge, Matt Flechter, James Marshall, Rory Neuner, and Alfreda Schmidt Shirley Rodgers Chad Gamble, and Dean Johnson

VISITORS: None 1) CALL TOORDER: Chair Baerman called the meeting to order at 11:50 a.m., at the Lansing Public Service Department Wastewater Treatment Plant. a. Roll Call Excused Absences: Shirley Rodgers b. 2) CITIZENCOMMENTS: None 3) APPROVALOFBOARD MINUTES: MAY 12, 2011

e
r*ti, .^. n''
tom]

Mr. Bloomberg moved, Mr. Flechter seconded, MOTION CARRIED UNANMIOUSLI to approve the minutes submitted for May 12, 2011. 4) ACTION ITEMS: r u

Mr. Bloomberg made a motion for a resolution thanking Dale Copedge for his thirteen plus years of service on the Public Service Board and express the Board's appreciation for his experience, expertise, perspectives and contributions to the Board and to the City in that respect, Ms. Schmidt seconded, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Copedge thanked everyone and stated it was a pleasure to serve. Mr. Gamble also thanked Mr. Copedge for his continued service and his expertise. 5) COMMUNICATIONS: None 6) REPORT OF OFFICERS: Engineering Section: A written report was distributed. Mr. Marshall questioned flooded basements-impact, responsibility, etc. Mr. Johnson answered those questions.

Public Service Board June 9, 2011

Page 2

Mr. Marshall asked for clarification and additional information on parts of the report. Discussion followed. 7) DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Mr. Gamble asked for the Board's opinion on the three options for the Residential pilot areas for the Single Stream Recycling collection via CART. He announced that a Commercial Pilot program will also be starting in the future. The Board would like an update of the status of the CART program in relation with the Single Stream Recycling. Mr. Gamble stated a tour of the construction site at Operation and Maintenance Division could be done at the same time. All agreed the October meeting will be held at Operation and Maintenance/CART facility for a tour and update. Mr. Gamble gave the Board a summary of the final draft of The City of Lansing 2012 Wet Weather Control Plan. Discussion followed. Mr. Gamble presented the construction plans for the new Transfer Station and Central Garage at the Operation and Maintenance/CART facility on South Street. Discussion followed. Mr. Gamble showed the Board the Master Plan for the City of Lansing called "Design Lansing" it is the first Master Plan that has been developed since fifty plus years. 12:51 p.m. Mr. Johnson left. Mr. Gamble passed out the Naturalization Pilot to the Board. This is a resolution based on the reduced schedules (furlough days), and budget to keep these areas mowed. Discussion followed. Ms. Schmidt asked about the story in the Lansing State Journal today of the River Trail near Elm Street just east of GM Factory that is destroyed. Mr. Gamble stated it is Parks Mileage money that will repair the trail, which should start later this month. Mr. Marshall question Pump Station life expectancy, and capacities. Mr. Gamble gave information. Mowing has been a real challenge this spring. Lansing received 6.8 inches of rain for the month of May, and 14.98 inches so far this Spring, which is the largest amount in recorded history. 1:15 p.m. Mr. Copedge left 8) OTHER BUSINESS: a. Topics for future meetings i. Procedure for projects that qualify for multiple funding sources ii. Local Street Improvement iii. Green Design iv. Wet Weather Project

Public Service Board June 9, 2011 v. vi. Sidewalks Single Stream Recycling

Page 3

9) PENDING ITEMS: The meeting adjourned at 1:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Janette Tate, Recording Secretary

OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY OF LANSING EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Regular Meeting City Council Conference Room 10th Floor, City Hall Lansing, MI June 23, 2011 Thursday, 8:30 a.m.

The Board met in regular session and was called to order at 8:58 a.m. Present: Dedic, Kraus, Munroe, Parker, Robinson (9:15), Rose - 7 Absent: Trustee Bernero, McCaffery, Singleton Others: Karen E. Williams, Finance Department; Attorney Kenneth Lane, Clark Hill (representing the City Attorney's Office; John Jackson, Asset Consulting Group; Scott Rubin, Brian Holland, Artio Global Investments. Secretary's Report. 0 new member(s), 0 reinstatement(s), 0 refund(s), 0 transfers, 0 retired. Total active membership: 506. Total deferred: 54. Refunds made since the last regular meeting amounted to $0.00. Retirement allowances paid for the month of May, 2011 amounted to $1,659,621.09. Total retirement checks printed for the ERS System: 840. 1 death(s), John C. Wabake, died 5/22/2011, (Traffic - retired 1/5/1993), age 75, no beneficiary. Eligible domestic relations orders received: 0. Domestic relations orders pending: 0. Eligible domestic relations orders certified: 0. It was moved by Trustee Parker and supported by Trustee Munroe to approve the Official minutes of the Employees Retirement System Regular Meeting of May 19, 2011. Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0 It was moved by Trustee Kraus and supported by Trustee Parker to approve the Official minutes of the Joint Employees Retirement System and the Police and Fire Retirement r- r-,., System Boards meeting of May 19, 2011 Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0 There were no public comments for items on the agenda.
N> (7, N P1

m
2 P1
CD

C.t

Employees Retirement System Regular Meeting of June 23, 2011 Page 2 It was moved by Trustee Munroe and supported by Trustee Parker to approve the following Request for Regular Age and Service Retirement: Murdock Jemerson (Parks - Executive Management), 11 years, 11 months, age 60, effective June 14, 2011. Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0. There were no requests for duty disability retirements. Ms. Williams reported that the Retirement Office received the Medical Director's Report for Case #2011 -E0317 and the report was forwarded to the disability subcommittee for review. Trustee Kraus reported that the disability subcommittee reviewed Dr. Roth's report for Case #2011 - E0317 and recommends concurrence with the Medical Director's evaluation to approve non-duty disability retirement. It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to concur with the Medical Director's report to approve the non-duty disability retirement of Case #2011 E0317. Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0. There were no Requests for Refunds of Accumulated Contributions. It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to excuse Trustee McCaffery from the Employees. Retirement System Meeting of June 23, 2011. Adopted by the following vote: 5 - 0 Mr. Scott Rubin and Mr. Brian Holland of Artio Global Management provided a performance review of City of Lansing Retirement System investment. Mr. Rubin provided an overview of the Firm, the Artio Global Team and account summary. Mr. Holland reviewed the Calendar Year Performance for 2010 and 2009, and the portfolio risk characteristics. Mr. Brian Hollard provided an overview of the Artio Global philosophy, process and market strategy. Trustee Robinson arrived to the meeting. The Employees Retirement Board discussed with John Jackson, the Artio Global Investment underperformance for 2008 - 2010 relative to its benchmarks. The Board discussed replacing the Artio Global investment and asked John Jackson to provide recommendations to the investment subcommittee.

Employees Retirement System Regular Meeting of June 23, 2011 Page 3 The Board moved to the Real Estate Investment Subcommittee Report. Trustee Rose reported that the subcommittee reviewed three potential replacements for ING Clarion. The committee received good presentations from JP Morgan and Prissa II and it was hard decision between the two firms. Trustee Rose felt that Prissa II met their goals better and were not weighted with a lot of industrial properties. Trustee Rose felt that Prissa II had a better balance of properties within the east and west coast. Trustee Parker also reported that he liked the Prissa II value-added approach. The subcommittee recommendation was to hire Prissa II. John Jackson reviewed Prissa II entrance and exit strategy for investments. The Board will commit a certain dollar amount and then Prissa II will call for the capital when needed. Mr. Jackson also explained how Prissa II acquires properties for the portfolio. Mr. Jackson also explained the differences between JP Morgan, Prissa II and the current manager, ING Clairon. Asset Consulting Group has recommended 5% real estate investment. The current investment is 1% with ING Clairon. John Jackson stated that the Board keep at 1% allocation to ING Clarion, and pull the money for capital calls from the overweighted assets in the portfolio. It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to hire Prissa II and pull the capital calls from the over weighted asset in the portfolio, then slow withdraw from ING Clarion. Adopted by the following vote: 6 - 0 John Jackson reviewed the replacement strategy for Artio Global. He reported that Asset Consulting generally provided six possible investment managers for the Board to narrow down to 2-3 finalists for interviews. Attorney Ken Lane reviewed the Election Policy and the Board requested that the current draft be revised with alternatives. Attorney Lane also reviewed the current Disability Application Review Policy. Trustee Dedic suggested that the criteria should be that a duty disability applicant should only be evaluated for the job in which he was injured. Attorney Lane stated that Trustee Dedic's suggestion would require an amendment to the Ordinance. Attorney Lane provided a draft for the Frequently Asked Question Document for the Employees Retirement System. The Board requested another month to review with corrections made by the Retirement Office.

Employees Retirement System Employees Retirement System Regular Meeting of June 23, 2011 Page 4 Attorney Lane reported that the City of Lansing did not get the lead plaintiff position for the litigation against China Integrated. Attorney Lane provided an update of the Invacare possible litigation. Milberg is waiting for a response to its letter outlining the concerns regarding Invacare's product. Milberg has reported that lnvacare may voluntarily take care of the issue and they may not be a need for litigation. Attorney Lane reviewed the Fraud Monitoring Policy. John Jackson also discussed that he was checking with other firms to advise the Board regarding a dollar amount for the policy. Attorney Lane suggested a $50,000 dollar amount threshold in which the fraud monitoring firms would not bring litigation issues to the Board. Attorney Lane discussed the dollar amount with Milberg and Robbins, Gellar. Attoirney Ken Lane provided a legislative update that summarized the pending Michigan House and Senate Bills and recently adopted Public Acts. He reviewed HB 4060 and 4123. The HB 4156 would require public pension system boards to publish its annual report, budget, and a listing of all expenditures on a website. Trustee Rose and Trustee Robinson discussed costs to the retirement system keep a retirement website updated with the required information if passed by the Michigan legislature. Attorney Ken Lane also discussed HB 4223 and SB 7. Senate Bill 7 would create the "Publicly Funded Health Insurance Contribution Act" to require that all public employees pay a certain percentage of the overall cost of the health insurance. Attorney Lane stated that as the current bill is written, it does not apply to retirees. Attorney Ken Lane reviewed the Public Act 38 of 2011 that amended the Michigan Income Tax law to tax public pensions, depending the age of the taxpayer. Trustee Dedic moved the ERS Ordinance Status and Board policies to pending until the next meeting. Karen Williams distributed the handbook updates to trustees and Attorney Ken Lane reviewed the updated table of contents. Karen Williams updated the Board that she provided a demonstration on the Retirement Calculation worksheets for the State of Michigan group working on pension software. Karen Williams distributed the Securities Lending and Board Expense Monthly report for May. John Jackson provided a review of the Investment Report for the month ending May 31, 2011.

Attorney Ken Lane reported that EFI Actuaries has returned a signed original copy for the contract for actuarial services. It was moved by Trustee Rose and supported by Trustee Parker to adjourn the meeting. Adopted by the following vote: 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11:01 a.m. Minutes approved on Jerry Ambrose, Secretary Employees' Retirement System

Scott Dedic, Chairperson Employees' Retirement System

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

9th Floor, City Hall 124 W. Michigan Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48933-1694 (517) 483-4141 (voice) (517) 483-4479 (TDD) (517) 483-6066 (Fax)

Virg Bernero, Mayor

TO: FROM: DATE:

City Council President A'Lynne Robinson and Council Members Mayor Virg Bernero July 21, 2011

RE: Resolution-Authorizing Floodplain Development Management- Designating an Enforcing Agency and Designating Regulated Flood Hazard Areas

The attached correspondence is forwarded for your review and appropriate action. VB/rh Attachment

"Equal Opportunity Employer"

City of Lansing

Inter-Departmental
Memorandum

To: From: Subject: Date:

Virg Bemero, Mayor Susan Stachowiak, Zoning Administrator CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - Floodplain Development Management July 20, 2011

Please forward this resolution to City Council for placement on the Agenda. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please give me a call.
Attachments

"Equal Opportunity Employer"

INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE Council Member Jeffries, Chair of the Committee on Development and Planning introduced: An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended The Ordinance is referred to the Committee on Development and Planning RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING By Council Member Jeffries RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LANSING, that a public hearing be set for Monday, August 8, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 10th Floor Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI for the purpose of considering an Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, State of Michigan, under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended. Interested Persons are invited to attend this Public Hearing

MICHIGAN COMMUNITY RESOLUTIONTO MANAGEFLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the City of Lansing, in Ingham County, MI currently participates in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMAs) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by complying with the program's applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for the purposes of significantly reducing flood hazards to persons, reducing property damage, and reducing public expenditures, and providing for the availability of flood insurance and federal funds or loans within its community, and WHEREAS, the NFIP requires that floodplain management regulations must be present and enforced in participating communities, and utilize the following definitions which also apply for the purposes of this resolution: 1. Flood or Flooding means: a. A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from: 1) the overflow of inland or tidal waters, 2) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, 3) mudflows, and b. The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding, as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this definition. 2. Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) means an official map of a community, as may have been issued by the FEMA, where the boundaries of the flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) related erosion areas having special hazards have been designated as Zone A, M, and/or E. 3. Floodplain means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see definition of flooding). 4. Floodplain management means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works, and floodplain management regulations. 5. Floodplain management regulations means zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as a floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance), and other applications of police power that provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. 6. Structure means a walled and roofed building that is principally above ground, gas or liquid storage facility, as well as a mobile home or manufactured unit.

WHEREAS, the Stille-Derossett-Hale Single State Construction Code Act", Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended (construction code act), along with its authorization of the state construction code composed of the Michigan Residential Code and the Michigan Building Code [and its Appendices (specifically Appendix G)] contains floodplain development and management regulations that comply with the FEMA NFIP minimum floodplain management criteria for flood prone areas, as detailed in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR), Section 60.3, and WHEREAS, by the action dates of this document, the City of Lansing affirms the responsibility to administer, apply, and enforce the provisions of the construction code act and the state construction code, specifically the Michigan Residential Code and the Michigan Building Code, to all construction within its community boundaries, and NOW THEREFORE, to maintain eligibility and continued participation in the NFIP, 1. The City of Lansing directs its Building Official to administer, apply, and enforce the floodplain management regulations as contained in the state construction code (including Appendix G) and to be consistent with those regulations by: a. Obtaining, reviewing, and reasonably utilizing flood elevation data available from federal, state, or other sources pending receipt of data from the FEMA to identify the flood hazard area and areas with potential flooding. b. Ensuring that all permits necessary for development in floodplain areas have been issued, including a floodplain permit, approval, or letter of no authority from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality under the floodplain regulatory provisions of Part 31, "Water Resources Protection," of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended. c. Reviewing all permit applications to determine whether the proposed building sites will be reasonably safe from flooding. Where it is determined that a proposed building will be located in a flood hazard area or special flood hazard area, the construction code act enforcing agent shall implement the following applicable codes according to their terms: 1. Floodplain management regulation portions and referenced codes and standards of the current Michigan Residential Code. 2. Floodplain management regulation portions and referenced codes and standards of the current Michigan Building Code. 3. Appendix G of the current Michigan Building Code. d. Reviewing all proposed subdivisions to determine whether such proposals are reasonably safe from flooding and to ensure compliance with all applicable floodplain management regulations. e. Assisting in the delineation of flood hazard areas; providing information concerning uses and occupancy of the floodplain or flood-related erosion areas, maintaining floodproofing and lowest floor construction records, cooperating with other officials, agencies, and persons for floodplain management. f. Advising FEMA of any changes in community boundaries, including appropriate maps. g. Maintaining records of new structures and substantially improved structures concerning any certificates of floodproofing, lowest floor elevation, basements, floodproofing, and elevations to which structures have been floodproofed.

2. The City of Lansing assures the Federal Insurance Administrator (Administrator) that it intends to review, on an ongoing basis, all amended and revised FHBMs and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and related supporting data and revisions thereof and revisions of 44 CFR, Part 60, Criteria for Land Management and Use, and to make such revisions in its floodplain management regulations as may be necessary to continue to participate in the program. 3. The City of Lansing further assures the Administrator that it will adopt the current effective FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS), FHBMs, and/or the FIRMs by reference within its Floodplain Management Map Adoption Ordinance or similarly binding ordinance documentation. Community: Officer Name: Signature: Witness Name: Signature: Date Passed: Title: Date: Title: Date:

ORDINANCE ADDRESSING FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS OF THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE City of Lansing, Ingham County, MI Ordinance number
An Ordinance to designate an enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing located in Ingham County, and to designate regulated flood hazard areas under the provisions of the State Construction Code Act, Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended. The City of Lansing ordains: Section 1. AGENCY DESIGNATED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state construction code, in accordance with Section 8b(6) of Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, the Building Official of the City of Lansing is hereby designated as the enforcing agency to discharge the responsibility of the City of Lansing under Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, State of Michigan. The City of Lansing assumes responsibility for the administration and enforcement of said Act through out the corporate limits of the community adopting this ordinance. Section 2. CODE APPENDIX ENFORCED. Pursuant to the provisions of the state construction code, in accordance with Section 8b(6) of Act 230, of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, Appendix G of the Michigan Building Code shall be enforced by the enforcing agency within the City of Lansing. Section 3. DESIGNATION OF REGULATED FLOOD PRONE HAZARD AREAS. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Entitled "Ingham County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)" and dated 8/16/11 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) (FIRMS) panel number(s) of 26065C; 0013D, 0014D, 0018D, 0020D, 0108D, 0126D, 0127D, 0128D, 0129D, 0131D, 0132D, 0133D, 0134D, 0136D, 0137D, 0139D, 0141D, 0142D, 0143D, 0144D, 0151D, 0153D, 0154D, 0161D, 0162D, and 0170D dated 8/16/11 are adopted by reference for the purposes of administration of the Michigan Construction Code, and declared to

be a part of Section 1612.3 of the Michigan Building Code, and to provide the content of the "Flood Hazards" section of Table R301.2(1) of the Michigan Residential Code. Section 4. REPEALS. All ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. PUBLICATION. This ordinance shall be effective after legal publication and in accordance with the provisions of the Act governing same. Adopted this (Year). This ordinance duly adopted on (Date) at a regular meeting of the (Name of Adopting Body) and will become effective (Date). Signed on (Date) by (Printed/Typed Name), Clerk of the (County, City, Village, or Township) of (Name of Unit of Government). Attested on (Date) by (Printed/Typed Name) Title: Chair, Mayor, Supervisor, or President of the (County, City, Village, or Township) of (Name of Unit of Government). (Signature), (Signature), (Date) day of (Month),

NFIP MI MOD ORD non-computer fill-in, UPDATED 4/5/2011

MICHIGAN LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION (MLCC)

7150 Harris Drive, P.O. Box 30005 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7505

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

LOCAL GOVERNMENT 15-DAY NOTICE

[Authorized by R 436.1105 (2d) and (3)]

July 15, 2011 LANSING CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CLERK 124 W MICHIGAN LANSING, MI 48933-1694 Request ID #: 619632

The Michigan Liquor Control Commission has received an application from GOLDEN TEMPLE, INC. REQUESTS TRANSFER OWNERSHIP 2011 SDD & SDM LICENSED BUSINESS LOCATED AT 815 W EDGEWOOD, SUITE B, LANSING, MI 48912, INGHAM COUNTY FROM I & J, INC. STOCKHOLDER: OPINDER KAUR 3010 NORTHPOINTE DR, APT C, JACKSON, MI 49201 H: 571-879-2322 B: 517-5052796 Specially Designated Merchant (SDM) licenses permit the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises only., Specially. Designated Distributor (SDD) licenses permit the sale of alcoholic liquor, other than beer and wine under 21 per cent alcohol by volume, for consumption off the premises only. For your information, part of the investigation of the application is conducted by the local law enforcement agency and investigative forms will be released to them either in person or by mail. Although local governing body approval is not required by the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Rules and Related Laws for off-premise licenses, the local governing body, or its designee, may notify 'the Commission at the above address within 15 days of receipt of this letter if the applicant location will not be in compliance with all appropriate state and local building, plumbing, zoning, fire, sanitation and health laws and ordinances, or if the applicant is considered ineligible due to other factors. All conditions of non-compliance must be outlined in detail, indicating the applicable laws and ordinances. A copy of the law and/or ordinance may be submitted with the notification. If you have any questions, please contact Unit 3 of the Retail Licensing Division at (517) 636-0204 een

LC-3104(Rev. 09/05) Authority: R436.1105(2d) and (3) Completion: Mandatory Penalty: No License

The Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, disability, or political beliefs. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you may make your needs known to this agency.

TO: FROM: DATE: RE:

Lansing City Council Mary Sabaj Ingham/Lansing Co July 15, 2011 FY2011-2012 State Funding Application, MDOC Contract and Sub-contracts for Community Corrections Programs

^,^ r4t9 Oorrections . nager

Lansing City Council, Each year the State Community Corrections grant funding application is approved by the Ingham County Board of Commissioners and the Lansing City Council. I have attached the Resolution as passed by the Board of Commissioners on June 28, 2011 and a copy of the Application. In order for the State Community Correction Advisory Board to approve the application, the deadline for local approval is August 18, 2011. The Ingham/Lansing Community Corrections Advisory Board respectfully requests City Council approval of the 2011-2012 Annual Funding Application.
The MDOC-Office of Community Alternatives grant application and subsequent grant award will provide State funding for the following Community Corrections programs for State fiscal year 2011-2012: Pathways Employment Program provided by Peckham, Inc. Relapse Prevention & Recovery Program provided by C-E-I Community Mental Health Holistic OUIL III Program Enhancements (HOPE) provide by C-E-I Community Mental Health Cognitive Change Groups provided by National Council On Alcoholism Program Referral & Gatekeeper Services provided by Community Corrections staff Day Reporting services provided by a vendor yet to be determined Community Corrections Advisory Board Administration Program Total Additionally, Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Services to be provided by CET- Community Mental Health - House of Commons, National Council on Alcoholism - Glass House $70,737 $47,200 $46,347 $34,650 $12,500 $43,350 $62,000 $316,784
1,3

and Holden House and other out of county programs valued at: Thank you for your consideration and action on this request.

$495,670 c-. rn
o-.

N)

ADOPTED-JUNE 28, 2011 Agenda Item No. 18 Introduced by the Law Enforcement and Finance Committees of the: INGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION AND ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FOR INGHAM COUNTY/CITY OF LANSING COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS AND AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS FOR FY 2011-2012 RESOLUTION #11-204 WHEREAS, the State Community Corrections Advisory Board, the Ingham County Board of Commissioners, and the City of Lansing approved the Ingham County/City of Lansing Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the State Community Corrections Advisory Board, the Ingham County Board of Commissioners, and the City of Lansing approved the Application for State of Michigan Community Corrections Act Funds for FY 2011-2012; and WHEREAS, the FY 2011-2012 Application provides for the continuation of the following CCAB Plans and Services programming and the Drunk Driving Jail Reduction and Community Treatment Program with a portion of Ingham County's allocation of State Community Corrections funds; Relapse Prevention and Recovery ($47,200) and House of Commons program enhancements (H.O.P.E.) ($46,427) to be provided by C.E.I. Community Mental Health, Employment Services ($70,737) to be provided by Peckham Vocational Industries, Inc; Jail-Based Case Management services ($12,500) to be provided by CCAB staff; Cognitive Change Groups ($34,650) to be provided by National Council on Alcoholism, and for Day Reporting services ($43,350) to be provided by a vendor yet to be determined; and WHEREAS, the FY 2011-2012 grant award provides Ingham County with the use of residential beds (estimated 28 per day) with M.D.O.C. contracting directly with residential providers rather than with local jurisdictions for a projected value of $495,670; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the FY 2011-2012 Application, residential services are to be provided by Community Programs, Inc., Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services, Kalamazoo Probation Enhancement Program, Inc., the Home of New Vision, National Council on Alcoholism, and C-E-I Community Mental Health - House of Commons; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the FY 2011-2012 grant award, the County may enter into subcontracts for the purpose of implementing Plans and Services and DDJR/CTP programs and services identified in the Community Corrections Plan and Application; and WHEREAS, the Subcontractors for Plans and Services and DDJR/CTP programming are willing and able to provide the services that the County requires. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering into an Agreement with the M.D.O.C. for Ingham County/City of Lansing Community Corrections for FY 20112012 for $285,437 in CCAB Plans and Services and administration funds, $31,347 in Drunk Driving Jail Reduction and Community Treatment Program funds for a total of $316,784 and for the use of an estimated 28

ADOPTED-JUNE 28, 2011 Agenda Item No. 18 RESOLUTION #11-204 residential beds per day for a value amounting to $495,670 for the time period of October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering into subcontracts for CCAB Plans and Services programming from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 with National Council on Alcoholism for the actual cost of Cognitive Change groups not to exceed $34,650; with Peckham Vocational Industries, Inc. for the actual cost of employment services not to exceed $70,737; and with C-E-I Community Mental Health for the actual cost of Relapse Prevention and Recovery services not to exceed $47,200. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a resolution to authorize the subcontract for Day Reporting services ($43,350) will be presented to the Board of Commissioners once the vendor has been selected and approved by the CCAB. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ingham County Board of Commissioners authorizes entering into a subcontract for DDJRICTP and Plans and Services programming with C-E-I Community Mental Health for program enhancements (H.O.P.E.) at the House of Commons not to exceed $46,347. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that entering into the subcontracts is contingent upon entering into the Agreement with the State. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the subcontracts are contingent throughout the subcontract period on the availability of grant funds from the State of Michigan for these purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board Chairperson and County Clerk are authorized to sign any necessary contracts/subcontracts consistent with this resolution subject to approval as to form by the County Attorney. LAW ENFORCEMENT: Yeas: Celentino, Holman, De Leon, Copedge, Schafer, Dragonetti Nays: None Absent: None Approved 6/16/11 FINANCE: Yeas: Schor, Tsernoglou, Nolan, Bahar-Cook, McGrain, Dougan Approved 6/22/11 Nays: None Absent: None

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

"Expecting Excellence Every Day"

Office of Community Alternatives

Community Corrections Plan and Application Fiscal Year 2012

CCAB Name:

Ingham/Lansing

Application Type:

A nnual/Full

Email the application to: and, Send one copy of the application to:

MDOC-OCCCa?michigan.gov DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Office of Community Alternatives P.O. Box 30003 Lansing, Michigan 48909

DUE DATE.: June 1, 2011

NOTE: CCABs in a multi-year contract will need to complete SECTION I (A, B, C) as well as the new BUDGET form and program descriptions for any proposed program changes.

Page 1 of 13

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION "lick her Name of CCAB: 1x_ Genera Contact information:
Name: Title: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Contact Person (manager) Mary Saba]

11

Federal I.D. Number: Fiscal Agent

1
CC4BGhairperson

CCAB Manager 121 E. Maple St., P08 319 Mason

MI 48854 517-676-7232 517-676-7214

Carol Koenig Commissioner P.O. Box 319 Mason

MI 48854 517-676-7200 517-676-7264

Judge Janelle Lawless 30th Circuit Judge 313 W. Kalamazoo Lansing

MI 48901 517-483-6436 517-483-6536 CC lawless@ingham.org

msabaj@ingham.org

Bc koenig@ingham.org

Type of Community Corrections Board: City/County Counties/Cities Participating in the CCAB: Ingham County and City of Lansing May24, 2011 Date application was approved by the local CCAB: Date application was approved by county board(s) of commissioners (and city council): Date application was submitted to OCA: June 1, 2011

June/July2011

B: CCAB Membership
Representirsg:

--

------

Name (and email if available

Major Sam Davis so sdavis@ingham.org . County Sheriff: jkraus@lansingmi.gov Lt. James Kraus Chief of Police: cc canady@ingham.org Hon. Clinton Canady Circuit Court Judge: fdeluca^a ci.lansing.mi.us Hon. Frank Deluca District Court Judge: cc lawless@ingham.org Hon.. Janette Lawless Probate Court Judge: be koenig@ingham.org Carol Koenig County Commissioner(s): cebicy@corncast.net Rev. Charles Bicy Service Area: pa dunnings@ingham.org Stuart Runnings f1! County Prosecutor: tbarger@4grewal. corn Thomas Barger Criminal Defense: johnsondiversified@gmail.corn Neal Johnson Business Community: Vacant Communications Media: Vacant (Circuit Probation Supervisor is in process of local appontment) Circuit/District Probation: pacificguidance@yahoo.com Scott Schultz Monica Jahner moni@att.net General Public: dquinney@ci.lansing.mi.us Derrick Quinney City Councilperson: -^ When were your bylaws last updated (send copy)? March 14, 1991 Does your CCAB have a "definition of a pattern of violence" that excludes offenders from any PA511 programming? Y ES (submit with your application documents)

Page 2 of 13

C: Summary-

fly

summarize the key p oints

of

our Community Corrections

Pln:

,-. (all'neld permit carringe i ezur.ns) 1. What programs, practices and policies contribute to a reduction of (or maintenance of low) prison commitment rates: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. a. How do they contribute to reduced/maintained PCRs? b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to reductions in your PCR: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 2. What programs, practices and policies contribute to improved jail utilization? Click here to enter text. How do they contribute to improved jail utilization? a. b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to improvements in your jail utilization: Click here to enter text.

Page 3 of 13

A: INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN:

Strafegic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have been established' by the.Officeof Community Alternatives;in acco:raancewith` Pubiic Act 511 and State Board priorities. CCABs will be required to establish-Objectives and Strategies based upon OMNI Felony Disposition,;JPIS, CCIS and local data that will supportState Goals and Priorities. Strategic Issues are identified

as Felony Dispositions Jail Utilization and Local Priorities, local lead

OCA will provide the CCABs WithOMNIFelony.Disposition and .J PIS data. CCABs shall analyze this data alongwith CCIS data (reports'run locally from Case Manager) and develop Key Objectives and supporting;Strategiesthot will toward attainment of. Goals and Priorities established by the State Board and OCA, as well as local objectives and priorities promoted in the comprehensive plan.

A thorough review of the data should include: m Overall PCRs, rates within sentencing guideline ranges, PCRs within Group 1 and Group 2 offense categories status at time of`offense and technica',l probation violationPCRs Reference. hanges in PCRs compared to prior years Cti er c: n s in your C .=+, C./area that influence change (n to 'p olders, policies, merlin Trim s, offe characteristics, etc.) Review your past.OCA funding proposals for icees

Example:
:ar the Strategic Issue of Felony nikpositiors, cn uusider the rt-.t- I Goal and Priority :s eun^^^ed on the^follow:ir^ pag o ^by DCA. ,E t blish oibjertI. as r ^^^c nd complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment r atei^lnta pry to prison commitment rates. For e, ample: 1. Reduce PV comrnitment rate from 32% to 25 2. Reduce Straddle rate to from 43%to 35% Under each OBJECTIVE outline in I:!Ilet form those STRATEGIES(steh s ) ro be taken, including continuing, new an i -I will support the attainment ofthe objecti. revis sl programs, or established and revised policies or prac i 011E i r ab have specified. Identify if these are "new", ontinuations or' rno iinications.'' Dr for sI ort term ('this fisc0 l term implementation. Keep in mind that all of the programs for wnich you are requesting;PAsil runding shoul:a be identified as strategies. Additionally, policies and !practices you propose (such as targeting specific populations or characteristics) are also strategies. Strategies may applylto more than one objective and shy ld bP m bea'ted under each objective as appropriate. or Example, the objective or " Reduce PV rate from 32% to 25% " may have the following strategies: 1. Initiate structured sentencing with jail followed by RS followed by community Cognitive Behavioral Treatment program that targets Level 2 and 3 probation violators. (New, FY 2012) 2. Target PVs Level 2 and 3 PVsas priorities for'Residential Services. (Continuation) The same strategies (with modirlcations) would be appropriate for the objective of reducing the PCR of Straddle Cell offenders. Further OMNI data analysis may support an additional strategy of: 3. Target CJRP eligible straddle cells, especially those from Group 2 without MDOCstatus for local sanctions' including

Page 4 of13

i3. Felony Disposition analysis

(NOTE RegionalCLA sshoulqcomMete analysis=rur ea 1 count^^. Par r n tr ims are permitted in this section Strategic Issue: Felony Dispositions Public Act 511 of 1933 stipulates that counties shall deeelopa conununity corrections comprehensive plan and pro ide an explanation of how the count,' or counties prison commitment rat till be reduced b, ciLerting non-violent offenders ar,ci pros, r ec rIL ism eduction while public safety is maintained The ^;ct i: intended to en:our a e n, particli,ation iri 0)01rnuniCt cooeel hint prepranis of ofender, 'one ..clue' lHL el .^e sentenced to imprisonment in a state correctional facile', orj iii, s:ho -Would not in^recce li^e ;sl: to pubic safety, have not demonstrated a pattern of lerit -behasior, and do not have a criminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses. Goal: Reduce demand for prison resources and related auadetary requirements Reduce prison commitment of offenders who can and f `i . iy sancrior,ed arid Treated In Pie communi ty by fo llnwni ine, the principl e s of effec tive in, colon (1 I heed. respon_vl
m

Priority:

anuresis forms tf'a' do sis for your ovecrl 'e and s rated I_5. A l'sec . connection between dote aoc,! i,'sis oft!ectiees Gnd proposed programmiriq (strotegies)`.mdy result in denial or (=de-Iona/ 0001'01/01 Of your ' roc. L3 Usrng OMN Felon p 1. 2. Drs ositron aa'ta supo red b OCA fog CY 2.009 anal 2010: _

A re felony dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable?

Slight Increase - from 1,346 to 1,361 ( State A vg. 20.5%)

Describe changes within SGL categories. Report rates and elaborate: Overall Prison Commitment Rate (PCR): 2009: 11.1% 2010: 15.5% Straddle cell PRC: 2009: 12.9%

2010: 18.7% (Total Dispositions up 11.7%) (State A vg. 32.8%) (85.5% with PRV of 35 or greater) (42.6% parole or circuit court status at time of offense) Straddle Cell Groupl: 2009: 16.1% 2010: 11.9% Straddle Cell Group 2: 2009: 10.9% 2010: 17.5% (Total Dispositions up 19.4%) Option A CIRP eligible PCR: 2009: 16.5% 2010: 20.2% (1 of 3 lowest PCRs in State) (State A vg. 37.4%) PV Technical PCR: 2009: 6.3% 2010: 4.5% (Total Dispostions up 4.2%) (State A vg. 19.4%) OUIL Ili: 2009: 8.2% 2010: 11.7% (11 Straddle, 1 Presump., Total Dispositions up 6.1%) (State A vg. 32.8%) (82% with PRV of 60 or higher) (90.9% agent recommended prison) (State A vg. 18.8%) Overall, PCRs in all categories are very low even with slight increases in some categories. In categories where slight increases occurred, there were also increases in the total number of dispsitions. The PCR for higher range straddle cell offenders is one of the 3 lowest in. the State. 3. 4. W hat, if any, significant changes are reflected in distribution of dispositions among SGL categories? significant increase occurred in the PCR The most

Can you attribute any changes to strategies/programs in your comprehensive plan? 1. PCRs remain low for alt PA 511 program target populations - sentenced felony probation violators, straddle cells, and OUIL Ills 2. Jail Earned Early Release policies and electronic monitoring options for pretrial defendants, probationers, and eligible inmates who have served 50% of their sentences assist with managing the jail population and open up beds for targeted straddle cell offenders (see CJRP eligible PCR.)

Page 5 of 13

3. CCA B Jail-based Case Management facilitates the timely transfer of inmates sentenced to residential for treatment and frees up jail beds in order to retain targeted populations locally

5. Describe any changes in criminal justice system stakeholders that may have contributed to changes in rates:
None

6. Describe any changes in felony populations or offender characteristic that warrant a change in your plan: 7. Provide additional analysis you feel necessary to explain your prison commitment rates here: enter text. 713-2: Key Objectives and Strategies it NOTE: Click here to

Plan

target populations, objectives and strategies remain in line with felony population and jail utilization data.

objectives are not re ,ell ed; objecrl .'es adoa1d be measurable and i_ro^ Isle sufficient detail so Hearten can be monitored. Each objective should he followed be at least one stratee, Isten action policy, program) that will help ^^on ',eve your object' e a y^o^.l ,id above If you did not pro ale anal p si; es mould be supported by the aria II uujectlaa; an i sL. ai ^. ed tC tiler population Or Grul_!p 2 pC)paletloil, vJO Wouldn t (J (3np an Cr K?en In mind that all programs to v^J oLd on al"e Ieci 1_sting fur P m am -onsldereci strategies bL sure Lo cea I, dentify them as strategies 1. Objective #1: Maintain overall PCR between 11% and 15% Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return [enter)):
hive
e i r o.1l e ire i -

1. Probation supervisory review of all prison recommended cases; modifying where appropriate to utilize collaborate case management for those who can be safely and effectively diverted to a local sanction. (Continuation - Long Term)

2. Utilize structured sentences for targeted populations that include, as appropriate, reduced jail sentences followed by residential placement followed by Day Reporting, Cognitive Change Groups, and OP/lOP Substance A buse treatment and other services to facilitate successful community integration (Continuation - Long Term) 3. Continue all strategies and policies that effectively open local jail beds for felony offenders targeted for local retention, including the Sentinel electronic monitoring program, earned early release policies, in jail programming, utilization of PA 511 programs in lieu of or in reduction of jail time, pretrial pre-arraignment bond recommendations and community supervision, implementation of Pretrial Risk A ssessment Project, and CCA B Gatekeeper &Program Referral Services (Continuation - Long Term) 2. Objective #2: Maintain straddle cell PCR between 17% and 19%

Strategies in support of Objective #2:

Target straddle cell offenders, with an emphasis on Group 2 offenses, as a priority population for structured sentences that include reduced jail sentences followed by residential followed by Day Reporting and Cognitive. Change Groups and other treatment and services to facilitate successful community integration. 3. Objective #3: Maintain technical probation violation PCR between 4% and 7%

Strategies in support of Objective #3:

Target felony Level 2 and 3 probation violators as a priority population for structured sentences that include reduced jail sentences followed by residential followed by Day Reporting and Cognitive Change Groups and other treatment and services to facilitate successful community integration.

Page 6 of 13

O-

4. Objective #4: Maintain OUIL III PCR between 8% and 12% Strategies in support of Objective #4: Target OUIL 111 convicted offenders for reduce jail sentences followed by residential treatment, including PA 511 HOPE program, stepping down to PA 511 Relapse Prevention and Recovery prograrn 5. Objective #5: Click here to enter text. Strategies in support of Objective #5 : Click here to enter text.

o OMNI data to tract; changes in prison commitment rates that mere identified as objectives. Monitor arid report on changes in local circumstances or offender populations/character ostics that prevent attainment of your objectives. _Use CCIS data tc uetgrrmine the utilisation of your ping ram am.: ;our erg t o p,o ulations What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? Community Corrections staff, the CCAB and Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee (JUCC) address jail utilization issues on an on-going basis. Objectives will be monitored by Community Corrections. In cases where objectives are not being met or if implementation issues arise, Community Corrections staff will work with the appropriate department(s), the CCAB and/or the JUCC to facilitate implementation and/or develop and implement strategies to meet objectives.

Page 7 of 13

C: Jail Utilization Analysis:

(NOTE Pe renal CC Ls sir uld on ' pieit airal' ;County Ingham

RDC (including 665 offline beds) Utilization as 97.2% % of RDC Operational 601 Click here to Click here to Click here to Click here to Click here to beds #$ and 90.4% enter text. enter text. enter text. enter text. enter text. ofRDC 1. Does your county have a written county jail population management plan per PA 139 of 2007? YES (describe it here and submit a copy with your application) 2. In CY 2010, did your sheriff initiate a reduction in population because the jail exceeded 95% of RDC for 5 consecutive days per Public Act 140 of 2007? NO If YES, explain how this was carried out: Click here to enter text. 3. In CY 2010 how many times did the county declare an official (in writing) jail overcrowding state of emergency (over 100% of RDC for 7 consecutive days) per Public Act 140 of 2007? 0 4. Does your jail submit JPIS data? YES (comment on accuracy of JPIS reports) 5. What vendor or jail management software is used to report jail utilization? Currently ID Networks transitioning to V isionair Jail - target date Sept.., 2011
is

For, h ceunty,i Current Jail Utilization Click here to Click here to Click here to enter text. enter text. enter text, Click here to Click here to Click here to enter text. enter text. enter text. Click here to Click here to Click here to enter text. enter text. enter text.

Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text: Click here to enter text.

Click here to enter tent. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.

Strategic Issue: Jail Utilization Jail resources should be prioritized for _ise by' : idus con. icted of crimes aiiut persons earl r offender s :.ho present a higher risk of recidivism or risir -o rice norslic Local comprehensi^.^: community corrections plans should reduce the demand for rail beds by diverting non violent and lower-risk offenders, pi ornate reciairism reduction s^,hile maintaining pub l ic ,-fet^,% and reduce jai over
11

Goal:

Oner ate l or I^jail th n capau h tail reties: TIH oh,ta county. Priority: Improve jail utilizatieni ano reduce need to beard inmates in other facilities: avoid releases unuer emergency overcrowding act; maintain jail below the rated design capacity
OT

Or

TM'.

tn=

C-1: Using JPIS data (or local data as available} provide an analysis of local jail utilization including the average daily populations/lengths of stay of jail populations including felon and misdemeanant utilization, sentenced and unsentenced populations, partially sentenced populations, boarders, and offense categories. (Regionals: use carriage return [Enter] to separate information by jail) 1. This application uses combination of data depending on the jail -JP'S & local jail data 2. Are bookings up, down, or stable? Elaborate: Overall, bookings are down (8.2%) from 9,176 in 2009 to 8,422 in 2010 3. Describe changes in ADP or AvLOS for major population groups: The felony population A DP has declined by 15.7% (60.5 beds) while the overall ALOS has remained stable. The misdemeanor population ADP has increased by 12.6% (15.4 beds) with the overall ALOS also remaining stable. 4. Provide additional information to explain your jail utilization here including changes in stakeholders, law enforcement priorities, bed closures, etc.: Lansing Police Department (LPD) bookings through the LPD Detention Unit have been declining an average of 6.8% per year since 2006. LPD is the largest law Page 8 of 13

enforcement agency in the County and, therefore , has the greatest impact on the local criminal justice system.
C 2:.Describe i l olicfes and, practices 1. 2.

that influence jail population:

Y ES (describe) Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee, Chaired by CCA B Manager, includes representatives from all local CJ agencies and departments. 3. How are sheriffs good time and trustee credits awarded/forfeited? Sheriffs Good Time (GT) is 1 day for every 6 served and eligible inmate workers get day for day eared early release (EER) credit. GT and EER credit is awarded up front; GT days may be deducted for misconduct. If an inmate worker is fired, credit is given for any EER days earned. Inmates may also earn EER credit of I day for every 2 in-jail program sessions attended. Jail commitments may specify that an inmate is not eligible for any or for certain types of EER credit. Inmates may also be eligible to be released on GPS tether after 50% of their sentenced is served.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Is the jail "closed" to certain types of offenses/offenders/warrants? NO Does the jail accept boarders from other counties? NO If YES, what is the daily rate charged for a boarder? Click here to enter text. Does the jail have a county-imposed cap on local bed utilization to provide space for boarding? YES If YES, report number of boarders and the % of the RDC for all boarders. 193 -29% of RDC Does the jail accept Parole Violators on M DOC detainers? Y ES (what is the daily rate paid) $35.00 &$36/day Does the jail accept MDOC or Federal boarders under contract? YES If YES, what is the daily rate charged. for MDOC and/or Federal boarders? MDOC: $36/day IDRP Federal: $59.17/day. $30.00/day for

Does the jail have a "bed allocation plan"? NO Does the county have a "jail task force" in place to address jail utilization issues?

Immigration
9. What was the revenue from boarders for CY 2010? $2,474,279 10. What was the revenue from County Jail Reimbursement in CY 2010? $333,181 11. Which CJRP "option" did the county select for FY 2011? Option A - $43.50 Straddle PRV 35+... Which will the county select for FY 2012 if given an opportunity to change? Option A - $43.50 Straddle PRV 35+... 12. Does the jail operate a work release program (offenders leave the jail to work and then return to the jail)? YES If YES, how many beds (number and % of RDC) are work release beds? 4 How much are offenders charged to be on work release? $50/day (may be less on case-by-case basis) 13. Does the jail accept weekend sentences? ' YES If YES, approximately how many weekenders book in each weekend? 12 includes those sentenced to consecutive weekends (9) and sobriety court PV s (3) 14. Provide additional analysis you feel is necessary to explain your jail utilization here: JPIS data shows an overall

average daily population (ADP) decline from . 690 in 2009 to 646.5 in 2010. Local data shows that in CY 2009, there were 240 overcrowded days, 55 early release occurrances with 2,058 inmates released early. In CY 2010, there were 66 overcrowded days (-72.5%), 8 release occurances (-85.4%), and 263 inmates released early (-87.2%.) So, far in CY 2011 overcrowding has not been an issue as there have been only 2 overcrowded days and 0 early releases. JPIS data shows an overall decline in the felony population of 22.9%. The overall average length of stay (A LOS) remained stable. OMNI data shows an 11.7% increase (38) in straddle cell felony dispositions in FY 2010; 37 of the 38 were Group 2 Offenses. Jail sentences increased for Straddle/Group 2 by 18. Of the 1,361 total felony. dispositions in 2010, 84.4% are retained locally with 81.4% receiving some jail time. JPIS data shows the following target population A DP reductions: 1.) unsentenced felons down by 12.9% from 222.5 to 193.8 with the overall A LOS remaining about the satire; 2.) felony probation violators down by 28.7% from 73.8 to 52.6; and 3.) OUIL III down by 28.2% from 17 to 12.2 with a slight reduction in the overall average length of stay from 34.4 to 32.2 days. W ith 54-A and 55th District Sobriety Courts enrolling OUIL Ill felony cases, those receiving jail time are either not eligible for or are failures of the Sobriety Courts.
Page 9 of 13

JPIS data shows an increase of 12.6% in the misdemeanant population from 2009 to 2010. Local data shows that the sentenced misdemeanor population increased from 33.7% of beds available for local use in 2009 to 44.1% in 2010 with the A LOS remaining stable. The total number of inmates in this category have continued to increase since 2008 (up by 36%.)

The felony pretrial population continues to be the largest population even with the noted decline. This FY , an additional Pretrial Services Investigator position was added to provide pre-arraignment bond recommendations for felony charged defendants in the Lansing, 54-A District Court A lso added was direct community supervision for approx. 100 defendants. Continued enhancements of Pretrial Services will include implementation of the Pretrial Risk A ssessment Project with Luminosity, Inc. this FY . It is important to note that, due to the continued decline of County genera/ fund revenue, on January 1, 2011 another jail post was closed, reducing local beds from 472 to 408 (64.) This post was closed completely and is not being rented out at this point. A dditionally, by the end of CY 2011 federal funds that have been available to cover the cost of GPS electronic monitoring (EM) for an A DP of 30-40 indigent defendants, probationers, and inmates released after serving 50%. of their sentences will be exhausted. EM services will then revert back to a client pay basis for all grant funded participants, unless additional grant funding is found. The impact of these two factors on the A DP will continue to be monitored to determine if current strategies need to be modified or new ones developed.

C 3: Key Objectives NOTE:

and

Strategies

Flee obj ectives are not required; objectives should be measureshle an: pl e, Lae sufficient detail so prog[ ass :an be monitored Eh H .) 1 n-use shoulcl be folle o at least one strafe u s pmnshn that ' ill bel i action poi' \ our ohlettRe si [ijutives and in i should be f ,ou curl not infer tit}; tl^is LOS i ^i of misdemeanants in ,,our ailslosis sou e.ouldn't de elnp an objec-i e e related to that po Refer to the most recent JPIS data ,or your local data/snapshot if you don t have JPIS) Keep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies Be sire to clearly identify them as strategies.
Edd UiTO, 1

1. Objective #1: Contra/ early releases due to overcrowding at 2010 levels or below. Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return):

Pursuant to JPMP, release sentenced inmates scheduled for release within3 days; local ordinance violators, unsentenced inmates held on $10,000 bond or less; unsentenced and sentenced for child support who have served 50% of their sentence, and prior to counton day 7 of overcrowding sentenced inmates scheduled for release within 12 days. (Continuation - Long Term)
1.

2. Continue Earned Early Release (EER) policies granting day for day EER for inmate workers and 1 EER day for every 2 injail program sessions (Continuation-Long Term) 3. Increase untilization of electronic monitoring inmates eligible to complete their sentences on EM (Continuation- Long Term) 4. Target felony straddle cell offenders and probation violators for graduated sanctions that include residential and other
Page 10 of 13

PA511 programs in reduction of jail time (Continuation - Long Term) 5. Target higher range intermediate cell felony offenders for PA511 programs in lieu of or in reduction of jail time. (Continuation-Long Term) 6. Circuit probation supervisors to review of all fresh jail sentences to ensure that jail alternatives, imcluding residential and other PA511 programs, are being recommended and to modify recommendations where appropriate (Continuation Long Term) 7. Target pretrial defendants and sentenced misdemeanor probation violators for PA511 funded Day Reportingin lieu of incarceration. (Continuation - Long Term.) 2. Objective #2: Reduce ADP of felony pre-sentenced population by 10% and ALOS by 10% in all JPIS categories. Strategies in support of Objective #2: 1. Increase use of electronic monitoring and Day Reporting for pretrial defendants in lieu of incarceration (ContinuationLong Term) 2. Implement Luminosity, Inc. Pretrial Risk Assessment Project to provide objective standards for bond recommendations (New - Long Term)
3. Maintain Pretrial Services direct supervision optionin lieu of incarceration (Continuation-Long Term)

3. Objective #3: Reduce overall. ALOS for felony alcohol related cases to 30 days or less Strategies in support of Objective #3: 1. Target OUIL Ill intermediate straddle cell offenders for HOPE programs l & 11 in lieu of or in reduction of jail time (Continuation - Long Term 2. Divert eligible OUIL ill offenders to 54-A and 55th District Court - Sobriety Courts in lieu offal/ time (Continuation Long Term)
3. Target OUIL Ill probation violators and straddle cell offenders for repeated residential treatment in lieu of or in

reduction of jail time (Continuation - Long Term) 4. Objective #4: Click here to enter text. Strategies in support of Objective #4: Click here to enter text. 5. Objective #5: Click here to enter text. Strategies in support of Objective #5 : Click here to enter text.

Use JPIS data (or local snapshot if JPIS isn't available)to'track changes in objectives.
kloniLor and repore On changes in lo Cal Clrcb atLalnrnent o- yourobjectives.

jail

utilization That .ere identified as

,Larce or Cifender DJpU a5li^n CilararIstics that pi ey. enr

Use'CCIS-data to;determine the; utilization of your

programs

What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? Community Corrections staff the CCAB and Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee (RUCC) address jail utilization issues on an on-going basis. Objectives will be monitored by Community Corrections. In cases where objectives are not being met or if implementation issues arise, Community Corrections staff will work Page 11 of 13

to

with the appropriate department(s), the CCA B and/or the JUCC to facilitate implementation and/or develop and implement strategies to meet objectives.

Page 12 of 13

tl

Present any local priorities such as development of criminal justice coordinating councils, jail expansion/repair, public ieducation etc., which have not been identified in the abpve sections:

1. Continue CBT based education level program for male inmates conducted by Community Corrections. The program provides inmates with the opportunity to earn early release credit for participation and eligible participants are linked with Pathways Employment Program staff and other community resources before release. 2. Co-sponsor with Circuit and District Probation and Ingham County Parole, the 4th season of W omen A chieving Success workshops for female probationers and parolees. W orkshops are held every other month in lieu of a report day. Participants attend 1-1/2 hour workshops on a variety of topics such as The Power of Our Choices, W omen's Issues Related to A ddiction and Recovery, Empowerment. A W omen's Community Resource Day to be held in the South Precinct gymnasium is also planned for October 2011. 3. W ork will continue to develop and expand Community Re-Entry Planning for inmates leaving the jail. Community Corrections was not awarded th SA MSHA grant that was submitted in 2010. Consequently, other grant funding will be pursued and options explored that use existing resources.

Page 13 of 13

Administration Administration is defined as those activities and related costs that have been incurred for the overall executive and administrative functions of the local office or other expenses of a general nature that do not relate solely to the operation of a specific program as defined/approved within the local plan. They are costs that by their nature are administrative in support of the overall duties and functions of the local OCA. This category must also include its allocable share of fringe benefits, costs, operation and maintenance expenses, and if applicable, depreciation and interest costs. NOTE: A SUPPLY has a life expectancy of less than a year (paper, toner, folders, urine testing supplies, etc.) while EQUIPMENT has a.life expectancy of more than a year (fax machine, PBT, leaf blower). The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text after a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage. returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.
F r.A
a 6

T.v "3i

fzV ? B

a. b. c. d. e.

f.

1 utr^" } $^s' D 0 2' Name and title of CCAB manager: Mary Saba], CCA B Manager Name(s) and title(s) of clerical and/or administrative support staff: Jill Bauer, A dministrative A ssistant to the Controller (as of June 27, 2011) Is there a request for funding of other administrative or support personnel such as IT, human resources, etc.? NO If so, describe: NA How frequently are CCAB meetings held? Regular meetings are held on the 3rd Tuesday of every other month, additional meetings are scheduled as needed: Describe what is done to prepare/prepare board members for CCAB meetings and who (manager, clerical, etc.) does what: The A genda is prepared by the CCA B Manager to include action items that. need to be addressed, as well as discussion and update items. A dvisory Board members may also requests items for discussion. Minutes are prepared by the CCA B Manager and attached for approval. Packets are prepared for CCA B members that includes the A genda, a Summary Sheet of action items, any background materials for agenda items and data reports. Do your CCAB meeting agenda include the following items (please remember to forward agenda and meeting minutes to our office): {* ^^ 6 r,4 ..w,.s.

F', `.

<e W

S9

r t ^ .

J^

.c....

^ ^_xe -

i. Review of prison commitment rates/recent sentencing trends: ii. Jail utilization/state of crowding: iii. Program utilization in general and by targeted populations: CI

iv. Status of contractual conditions (if applicable): v. Status of contractual objectives: vi. Correspondence from Lansing Office of Community Alternatives:

Page 1 of 5

vii. viii.

Expenditures and reimbursements to date:

What other items are typically on your meeting agenda? The A genda may not formally include all of the listed items above at each meeting. However, information is provided in report form that covers this information. If there is something that needs to be addressed, the topic will be added as an agenda item. A genda items also will include discussion and information about programs, program development, and other local strategies that are implemented to address prison and jail utilization (e.g., Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee activites and reports, Pretrial Services and Jail Re-entry initiatives.)

g.

Describe how expenditure reports are processed and forwarded to OCA in Lansing:

Invoices are submitted to the CCA B Manager, CCA B Manager prepares a voucher that is processed by County Financial Services. A ll invoices, vouchers and payments are handled pursuant to County policy. Expenditure reports are prepared by the accountant assigned to Community Corrections, the reports are provided to the CC4B Manager for review and submission to OCA ,
h. How often does the manager meet with, visit, and evaluate contracted programs?

Quarterly Program Provider Meetings, Scheduled Program Evaluations, and as needed Explain: Program evaluations are conducted and subsequently scheduled based on the determined need to verify compliance with contractual requirments and/or verify progress toward addressing identified deficiencies. The CCA B Manager attends groups sessions and visits program sites annually. Regular communication occurs via phone and e-mail to address questions, concerns, and other issues that arise.
Answer the following two questions only if PA511 funds support the CCAB manager's salary: i. How many staff does the manager directly supervise? I - CCAB Staff

Consultant
ii. How much time is spent training, evaluating or disciplining staff? The Staff

Consultant has been in this position for 15 years. This staff person participates in training as required (e.g. COMPA S and other MOCA and MA CCA B sponsored training)
j. How often does the manager meet with probation supervisors/officers? Community

k.

I.

Corrections works closely with Circuit Court Probation supervisors and agents, often on Explain: CCA B Manager provides agent training at least once a year, a daily basis. and for all new staff and attends staff meetings as necessary. A Circuit Court Probation Supervisor has always been a member and regular participant of the CCAB, Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee. There is a tot of collaboration and communication. How often does the manager meet with the prosecutor? Formal meetings as needed Explain: Most often communication or work is done with the Deputy Prosecuting A ttorney. Meetings are held with the Prosecuting A ttorney as needed. A n annual training is also provided for the prosecuting attorneys. How often does the manager meet with judges? Formal meetings as needed Explain: Community Corrections has a good relationship with the Circuit and District Judges.
Page 2of5

On a regular basis, most communication and work is done wth the Circuit Court Deputy A dministrator. Judges will contact Community Corrections directly with specific questions and concerns and Community Corrections staff will do the same. The Circuit Court Deputy A dministrator is a member and regular participant of the Jail . Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee. There is a lot of collaboration and communication. m.How often does the manager meet with the sheriff/jail staff? As needed Explain: The Jail A dministrator has always been a member and regular participant of the CCA B, Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee. There is a lot of collaboration and communication. n.. How often does the manager meet with financial support staff? As needed Explain: A County Financial Services accountant is assigned to Community Corrections and issues are addressed as needed. Most communication is through phone and e-mail. o. How often are CCIS data reports run and reviewed for accuracy? monthly Explain: W ith the new COMPA S Case Manager the process is to run reports monthly and cross check with invoices and program staff for accuracy. Considerable time is required to enter and quality control COOS programdata, ranging from 4- 6 hours per month. Ingham continues to enter residential program data to have access to more detailed information. The time required to enter data has increased since the COMPA S still is not able to populate fields with OMNI data. p. How much time is spent reviewing OMNI and jail data? Jail data daily/OMNI at least monthly Explain: Jail population trends are tracked through a variety of reports that include Inmate W orker Earned Early Release, Jail Snap Shots, Bookings and Booking Trend Charts for all Courts, A DP, Overcrowding (release occurances, early releases, days overcrowded.) OMNI data is downloaded into the "OLD" CCA MIS desktop from a data file provided by Circuit Court Probation because is not yet available in COMPA S Case Manager, OMNI data is used to prepare a monthly Circuit Court Disposition report that is reviewed and distributed. A variety of Community Corrections Resource Management Reports are distributed weekly/monthly to a network of local criminal justice system stakeholders and elected officials. q. How much time is estimated to be spent developing the plan and application? Preparation of the application document itself takes approx. 2-1/2 weeks. This does not include the time needed to review data. Changes and problems with application formatting, information required; etc. impact preparation time. Describe when and how the plan is developed: Plan development is really an on-going process that includes monitoring OMNI and jail data along with current strategies and programming and making modifications where appropriate. Community Corrections staff begins thinking about the application process in March and programming is discussed at the March CCA B meeting. The CCA B Manager is responsible for preparing the document and is assisted by the Staff Consultant who provides local data. r. Describe the involvement of other stakeholders or subcommittees in data analysis or plan/program development. The CCA B Manager also Chairs the Jail Utilization Coordinating Committee and Electronic Monitoring Oversight Committee which is helpful to the Community Corrections planning and program development process. The data maintained by Community Corrections is often the catalyst far discussion and Page 3 of 5

strategy development for the Community Corrections Plan and programs, as well as other initiatives such as Pretrial Services enhancements, electronic monitoring, automatied kiosk reporting, in jail programming, Earned Early Release policies, Jail Population Management Plan development. Community Corrections has s. How are utilization. and expenditures monitored? Program utilization is monitored reported weekly to judges and agents to increase awareness. Expenditures are monitored on a monthly basis through voucher preparation and monthly expenditure reports. t. What actions are taken when programs are under- or over-utilized? The first course of action is to regularly report utilization systemwide so that all stakeholders are aware. This information is distributed on a weekly basis. Community Corrections works with program staff and Circuit Court Probation Supervisors to determine what factors are contributing to utilization problems, as well as to develop a plan to address them. Program staff are encouraged to maintain communication and visibility with agents. Community Corrections ensures that information about program services and how to access services is thourough and use friendly. On occasion, the MDOC area manager has been brought into the discussions. u. Who develops the subcontracts for CPS funded services? County Corporate Counsel in conjunction with the CCA B Manager.
v. Who calculates jail bed days saved and how much time is devoted to that task? CCAB

Manager, calculated mid-year and end of year pursuant to the formula developed for each program.
w. What specific tasks are assigned to clerical support and what is the frequency and amount of time dedicated to those tasks? Orders supplies; inputs time sheet, a-mails CCAB Agenda if there is no clerical support, describe clerical tasks/frequency and time demands if performed by the manager: Community Corrections staff does all

word processing, copying, filing, phone answering, and any other clerical tasks other than those listed in section w. above.
x. Does the county have procurement or purchasing policies for contractual services, supplies, and/or equipment? Y es Describe: Supplies and equipment must be

purchased from V endors registered with the County; Computer equipment, software, etc. must be purchased through our MIS Department; contractual services are procured through a Request for Proposal process that is controlled by the County Purchasing Department
y. Please describe the county's policies on travel expense reimbursement (mileage, meal allowance, etc.): Ingham County has a 17 page Travel Policy. Generally, The amount

to be reimbursed for mileage is determined by the IRS Standard Mileage Rate Method. Mileage is computed on the shortest route between the point of departure and the destination, No meal allowance is allowed for travel completed the same day, otherwise supporting receipts must be provided and reimbursement made pursuant to IRS Meals and Incidental Expenses (M&IE).
z. Does your county have the facilities to host training (such as for cognitive programs or application training)? YES How many can your facilities comfortably accommodate?

The largest conferene room can accommodate 60-65 classroom style and 70-75 theater style Would you be interested in hosting training? Y ES
Page 4of5

aa. Does your county have a computer lab available for computer-based training? Y ES How many can your computer lab comfortably accommodate? 1 teacher and 9

students

Would you be interested in hosting training? YES

Page 5 of 5

CCAB: Ingham/Lansing Local Program Name: Program Referral & Gatekeeper Services to z oi o `s o e> Service Provider: Community Corrections end^ CCIS Service Type: 125 - Gatekeeper a0 QO r Total Projected Enrollment (for Gatekeeper): 165 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to enter text. Projected Early Jail Releases (for JPM): Click here to enter tent. Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: Click here to enter text. List projected enrollment/release by member county: Click here to enter text.

9# ^ g

Gatekeeper and Jail Population Monitoring are necessary processes or FUNCTIONS rather than programs as we typically think of them. GATEKEEPER Gatekeeping includes initial screening for program eligibility (not assessment) such as determining if the offender meets established target and preliminary eligibility criteria (SGLs, crime group, PV status, number of priors, etc.) and the subsequent referral and enrollment in programming as appropriate. Gatekeepers will complete CCIS data entry for program enrollment and may need to maintain waiting lists if programs are over utilized. In CCABs where there are no outside contracts (all services are delivered by managers or CCAB staff) a Gatekeeper program description may not be necessary. Determining eligibility and enrollment into the program can be done at the individual program level. Contact the program section manager or your grant coordinator with questions. Projections should be based on the total number of PA511 program referrals that will need to be screened for eligibility, referred, and enrolled in Case Manager. Subsequent data entry such as termination/discharge from programming and calculating jail bed savings is a function under administration. JAIL POPULATION MONITOR (JPM) Jail Population Monitoring is ONLY appropriate for jails with acute overcrowding where the primary function is to expedite EARLY release of offenders to avoid overcrowding emergencies. A JPM is NOT to simply facilitate the movement of offenders into already-ordered programs (this could be Gatekeeping) but to expedite releases to immediately reduce the ADP of the jail. JPM impact must be monitored so that local practices can be adjusted to AVOID the incarceration of those who are consistently released Projected enrollment should not be all offenders booked into the jail but the number that are projected to be successfully moved out of the jail (not into jail-based programming). OCA supports the following:

Page 1 of 5

G$

o Counties seeking JPM funding should have a written jail population management plan per Public Act 139 of 2007. The plan should reflect the use of the JPM to address overcrowding. o Funding should be limited to a period of years to permit local authorities to make policy changes to avoid jail crowding. ANSWERAILQUESTIONS'USING NA IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRA:i

The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.
of

0e'O

!! retc :

a. b. c. d. e.

g 4 il PaPA ATI This service functions as a Gatekeeper for PA511 as well as non-PA 511 programs. Are eligibility criteria for all PA511 funded programs established in Case Manager (or through some local system if not using Case Manager)? Explain: Case Manager Are offenders referred for screening for a specific program or for any program for which s/he may be eligible? Explain: specific programs List referral sources and how referrals are made for screening and enrollment:

fo

KEE^PE R l

s l

Referrals are received from probation agents, jail command staff, in jail program staff.
How else are offenders identified for program screening/enrollment? In addition to the referral sources above, a list is generated from the jail data base that searches text fields for programs and Community Corrections monitors court notes received from Circuit Court. All of these sources are cross referenced to ensure that every inmate is identified. What proportion of program enrollment is via direct referrals rather than Gatekeeper initiated placements? 100% Describe the steps taken to determine offender eligibility for a program: For PA511

f. g.

programs, the Gatekeeper screens for eligibility through the referring agent also making sure that referral documents are immediately forwarded to the program for review, then eligibility is confirmed with program staff once referral documents are received. For non-PA 511 programs, eligibility is confirmed with the appropriate agency. Eligibility is always confirmed prior to approval for transfer and prior to the scheduled outdate.
h. i. Do all offenders ultimately enrolled in PA511 programming have judicial orders mandating participation? YES Explain: Click here to enter text. Estimate how long it takes to determine initial eligibility and complete Case Manager/CCIS data entry for a new offender: 20-30 minutes For an established offender: If the data is in Case Manager and it only necessary to add, then 10-15

minutes. This includes the time required to make connections to screen for eligibility.
j. k. I. Do you meet with the offender to do the screening or work from referral documents? Explain: No What PA511 programs does this Gatekeeper screen/refer for? Click here to enter text. Describe non-PA511 programs/services that offenders may be referred to: MidSouth

funded substance abuse inpatient treatment, private pay inpatient treatment, there have been some faith based residential programs as well.

Page 2 of 5

lq

m. Describe the process of referring an eligible offender to PA511 programs (what do you do) and how long it takes: A fter an inmate and that inmate's agent is identified and the inmate is determined to be eligible, a group e-mail is created that links the

gatekeeper with the assigned probation agent, program staff, and jail command staff and sent as notification that the inmate is approved for a bed pending a lien check for outstanding warrants and the identification of any other problems that would delay the inmate from leaving on their scheduled out date. A t this point, the Gatekeeper acts as a coordinator and problem solver to address any issues that arise (see section p. below.) W hen all issues have been resolved, the Gatekeeper notifies all relevant parties that the inmate is ready to be transported to the program. Jail staff notifies the Gatekeeper of the transport date which is then provided to everyone in. the e-mail link, including the referring agent. The time it takes to successfully see the process through to the. inmate's arrival at the program depends on the number and nature of the requirements and/or obstacles encountered. It can range from an est.30 minutes, if no problems are encountered, up to several hours or more over the course of days to problem solve with process participants. A n est. average that includes those inmates presenting issues to be resolved would be 50 minutes for this part of the process. The process. continues with the Gatekeeper following the resident through the program. The Gatekeeper is notified if the resident walks-away, as well as consulted if other problems arise that often might result in a return to jail. Upon discharge, the case is closed in the Case Manger system. A t minimum, this adds an additional 10 minutes.

n.

How is the referral source notified of offender enrollment or ineligibility?

Immediately via phone or e-mail. In cases, where it is determined that an inmate does not meet eiligibility criteria for ordered programs or funding sources, work begins immediately to identify an alternative and work through the required process to enable release on the scheduled out date. 3.7% ($12,500) o. What proportion of your requested CPS budget is in this line item?
p. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of this service not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this function: The Gatekeeper function addresses in advance the many obstacles that can delay or stop a placement, (e.g. commitment language, pending charges, outstanding warrants, court events, completion of S/A assessments, medication needs, medical conditions and required tests, expediting agency decisions, funding agency and program policies, and transport issues.) The Gatekeeper also fields a variety of questions on a regular basis from agents, program and jail staff, and occasionally judges that are specific to the Gatekeeper function.

Page 3 of 5

Many of the residential programs Ingham County has dealt with over the years say that Ingham has the best process for facilitating and expediting placements, as well as assisting with program planning because they are often advised months in advance of the actual placement. The Gatekeeper also, provides constant monitoring of residential utilization and regular reports that are distributed o a network of judges, probation agents/officers, jail staff, program staff, so that adjustments can be made and problems addressed.

(Gatekeeper description is complete - Go to #3) ^^alop^latn $ . o or. , oEafe ,

_. ,.

w3

'

Does the County where this service is requested have a written jail population management plan per Public Act 139 of 2007? Choose an item. b. Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Part I) that this program is designed to address: Click here to enter text. c. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? Click here to enter text. d. What is the rated design capacity of the jail (s) prior to any bed closures? Click here to enter text. e. What is the current operational capacity of the jail (s) after bed closures? Click here to enter text. f. List the average daily population as a % of the rated design capacity of each jail where this service is requested: Click here to enter text. g. What data/information is used for targeting inmates for release? Click here to enter text. h. Describe circumstances under which you are called upon to recommend releases: Click here to enter text. i. Describe the process for identifying and recommending inmates for release and how long that process takes: Click here to enter text. j. Is the judge/probation officer notified of offender release? Choose an item. k. Describe how inmate releases, recommended releases, and successful movement documented: Click here to enter text. I. Do you track released inmates by characteristics such as crime class, offense type, legal status,. guideline range, etc.? Choose an item. m.How do you report offender movement to your CCAB and OCA? Click here to enter text. n. Is information on offender releases used for future planning such as bypassing jail with immediate program placement for specific offenses/offenders? Choose an item. o. What proportion of your requested CPS budget is in this program line? Click here to enter text, p. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the service not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this function: Click here to enter text, Ali R. GE R 1' As ate ' ee pingan v :1V1a,r notniec"esta y roggran sp edifie a p c o ntri buti ons ()war h e below objectives may o f be obvious . Answer as appropriate being z `careftt to t ao u bie c aunt D ailcla s saved in 7PM o r G a t e he^^nQ AN i to pro gta 'n s
C

a.

Page 4 of 5

..A

L,

a.

rr

frr,N

A
r , ,L::

Will this program reduce prison commitments? YES 1. If YES, clearly describe how: This program frees up jail beds for straddle cell offenders and level 2 and 3 probation violators targeted for local retention. Will this program impact jail utilization: YES i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this NA program: ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe 90% of 165 successful completion = 149 x how your estimate was calculated: 90 ALOS = 13,410 jail days saved Ili. If jail bed days saved can not be calculated, how is impact of this service documented? NA Is this program intended to impact recidivism? NO NA If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: epor 'n the u a "%a " ..t"., . '' cpcators,at a minimum: tPAW,graCyiPerforma s^oP ,,ap o , p ,) -' Di n (JR LOS p P C.)')j Pi ,In esi
i. "
r

bi

. ,

w.,.

o q-,,,i Percett e r that LCIS c n r o k.I.D Aia.

. 11

. .:-

-)ot'-)o eou i)

D p Ile, le to ,` our r a eroInler-PS - r rehalon ecFr , ,

n ) ,

-cd

,)

- d

^Cf

em

t itu

arm
b

the

'
_' C erDer o

JPi.1

F X511 Eland

D:)

fl

L.

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. 90% of those inmates eligible to be released to residential programs are transferred within 5 days or less of the "eligible to go" date 5.

Page 5 of 5

- _a u CCAB: Ingham/Lansing Local Program Name: Pathways Employment Services Service Provider: Peckham, Inc. CCIS Service Type: 815 - Employment Services Projected Enrollment: 48 Projected Length of Stay: 120 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to enter text. Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: Residential: Community: Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: Click here to enter text.

List projected enrollment by member county:

Click here to enter text.

GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for. New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations. Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. G00 is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs. Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Port I) that this program is desiened to address:
Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due to overcrowding, Based onyour objective(s), what r-your target po,pulatronP Sentenced felons, fresh sentences an d probation violations, with a priority on probation violators

Page 1 of 5

Describe tf elDrogramc a. Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results.

Sentenced felons with a 0-9 or greater SGL score on a fresh sentence and probation violators with a 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 30 days in jail who are unemployed, under-employed or have an unstable work history.
b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? NO ii. Who completes the assessment? NA iii. Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? NA iv. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level of treatment per the assessment? NA Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence YES Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? recommendation? NA How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Probation agents may make a referral after obtaining an amended court order. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.

c.

d.

e.

Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifies eligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCIS reporting process. Maintain PCRs in all target categories and controljail population and early releases due to overcrowding.
f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.

g. h.

Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Corrections will notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned in in the CCIS reporting process: If determined to be ineligible the participant is terminated,unless continued participation is authorized by the CCA B Manager. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Monthly CCIS reports are submitted by program staff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff
Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations.). NA ii. Number of sessions per week per cohort (group): Initially participants will

participate in an Orientation and the Job Readiness, Job Search and Job . Retention classes. Participants may be required to retake any of the classes as determined by the Employment Specialist. iii. How many cohorts? Participants will, at a minimum, participate in the Orientation, the 3 structured classes, 1 Job Club session per week until employment is obtained. Contact with the Employment Specialist will be
Page 2 of 5

maintained on a weekly basis, including visits to the job site where appropriate, and will decrease as the participant demonstrates success in maintaining employment over time. iv. Length of sessions: Classes are 2 hours in length
v. Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills than others, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for program completion? Length of stay is based on a period of stable employment up to 180 days. Identify what skills are taught in this program: The importance of attendance,

vi.

appropriate clothing, hygiene, dependable transportation, and appropriate attitude. How to successfully maintain a job by addressing work place behavior, relationships with supervisors and co-workers and understanding work place rules, including role playing on how to resolve specific work place situations that may arise. Haw to address a criminal background with a prospective employer, create a strength based resume and complete an application using strength based principles, including practicing skills through mock interviews and role play. Individual work will identify and address unique barriers to getting and maintaining employment.
vii. Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatment locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program: Using a

system approach for programs and services, the Employment Specialist will also present information through the in jail CBT program, establishing finks with inmates prior to their release. W orking with the . new Day Reporting provider selected this FY , the Employment Specialist will provide workshops for Day Reporting participants.
viii. ix. x. Are individual sessions part of the program? YES If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? NA On what basis would individual sessions be used? The Employment Specialist

will determine whether individual sessions are needed to address specific needs. This will be determined by working with participants in the classes or at any point that individual guidance and support are warranted throughout the program.
Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: The program's Employment Specialist has 12 years experience

providing employment services for hard to place populations; 9 years with Peckham, Inc. working specifically with the felony offender population; holds Global Career Developer Facilitator certification, was trained in Motivational Interviewing by Elizabeth Fabiano, and has lob Development training. j.
How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Invoices will include the names of all

participants served in the billing period, types of classes and dates completed, dates for all job club sessions attended, dates of all individual sessions attended.
k.

How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral Page 3 of 5

source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Monthly written progress

reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent. A gent's are notified of intake and noncompliance immediately.
1. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Pathways is

an individualized program able to provide intensive employment services for felony probationers with significant barriers. However, through the class and Job Club structure, the program is able to efficiently and effectively assist clients with a range of employability barriers. Services decline in intensity as participants successfully obtain and maintain employment. W hen employment has been secured, the program provides job retention support, including acting as a liason between employer and employee, as well as assisting with job upgrades. This FY the program is moving to a new office space in the V eterans Memorial Courthouse in the same building with Cicuit Court Probation. The close proximity to the Probation Depart. will enhance the referral process and accessabliity to program services, as well as communication with referring agents. The space will be furnished by Peckham to provide a classroom setting and will be equipped by Peckham with technology to facilitate class presentations and access to computers for job search and resume development.
pr 2gram mast eo tt u: IC= C,n , of Is nllr .i^^=` JJi e S Id Irre huulcj he nbeto,een th u bjec rr. ,s end.str.egi2 identified in Phrt 1 01 ,o'_e flpp i i:ntion, t'n7 r s eligibility m totedaboveana :your response here a. nd

b.

c.

Will this program reduce prison commitments? YES i. If YES, clearly describe how: Pathways is used as part of a structured sentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate local programming to target straddle cell offenders and level 2 at 3 probation violators for local retention. The program is used in lieu of or in reduction of jail sentences to open beds for offenders targeted for local retention. Will this program impact jail utilization: YES i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this program: Participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 30 days in jail. ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe how your estimate was calculated: Projected days saved: 1,410 65% successful completion of 72 total participants = 47; 47 participants x 30 days saved = 1,410 Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: Pobation violators are a target population. Maintaining low PCRs and reducing jail utilization for this population will reflect status toward achieving reduced recidivism. New offenses and probation violations will also be tracked for the duration of program participation.

Page 4 of 5

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required status of thefollowing Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: CoT recommends that 755, ofPA511 funded orogram enrokees e .om this:prograrMs . prima] ;birdatl uHi disco lr?^_ n e. ici Hint i_ CUS S..on pop: i TIC0S l;l 1ppc!"5 ci or Ch i en ask tl^c c1 nag In n CRs, Cc ed I:ragr it I. Till .`dill r iiect status rn\vard achievement of our obj tl .'?Isl. Track li bed d' saved I-apalinabl_ an `,UUI h ocram d

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 60% of participants will be competitively placed within 3 months of enrollment. 2. 50% of participants will retain employment for 3 months. 3, 80% will indicate overall satisfaction with program services resulting in axn average score of 4.5 on the Consume Satisfaction Survey.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB: Ingham/Lansing Local Program Name: Cognitive Change Groups t Service Provider: National Council on A lcoholism CCIS Service Type: C01 - Cognitive Programming Projected Enrollment: 36 Projected Length of Stay: 105 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to enter text. Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: Residential: Community: Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: Click here to enter text. List projected enrollment by member county: Click here to enter text. GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for. New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations. Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. GOO is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRA_IVI The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs. Identify the objective(s) from your felony..and/or jail analysis (Part I) that this prggirarn is designed to address: Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due to overcrowding. Basedon your objective(s), what is your targetr , o , elation ? ,u2 Sentenced felons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on straddle cell SGLs and level 2 and 3 probation violators Pagel of 5
II

Describe the program: a. Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results.

Sentenced felons: fresh sentences with 0-9 or greater SGL score and probation violators with 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of 90 days in jail. Not to include felony non-support convicted offenders. Sentenced Misdemeanants: Probation Violator with 1 prior in lieu of or in reduction of 30 days in jail, prior violation may not be for non-support conviction.
Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? NO ii. Who completes the assessment? NA iii. Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of. treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? NA iv. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the. recommended level of treatment per the assessment? NA c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence YES recommendation? Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? NA d. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? b.

Felony Probationers: A gent recommendation at Probation V iolation Hearing Misdemeanants: Referred by assigned District Court probation officer
e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.

Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifies eligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCIS reporting process.
f. Describe your process for. addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.

Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Corrections will notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned in in the CCIS reporting process. If determined to be ineligible, the participant is terminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCAB Manager. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Monthly CCIS reports are submitted by program staff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff
h. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations). ii.

Thinking for a Change, also incorporates SA MSHA A nger Management Number of sessions per week per cohort (group): 1 Intake, Introduction & Orientation, 2 group sessions per week for 10 weeks stepping down to 1 group
Page 2 of 5

session per week for 10 weeks, followed by an exit interview

iii. iv. v. How many cohorts? 30 Length of sessions: 1.5 hours Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills than others, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for program completion? 32 Identify what skills are taught in this program:

vi.

Phase I: Intro/Orientation; SelfA wareness, V alue Clarification, Time Management Phase Il: Thoughts Influence Behavior, A nger Management -Control Plans, Paying A ttention to Our Thinking, Recognizing thinking that leads to trouble and finding new thinking to replace it; the Agressions Cycle, Knowing your feelings, Cognitive Restructuring, Understanding the feelings of others and responding appropriately Phase Ill: Interperson Skill Building, A ssertiveness - Conflict Resolution Model, Stop and Think, Problem Description, Goal Setting; Choices and Consequences, Choose, Plan. Do, Evaluate, Problem Orientation, Problem and Goal Definition, Generating A lternatives
Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatment locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program: viii. Are individual sessions part of the program? NO ix. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? NA x. On what basis would individual sessions be used? NA Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: The group facilitator has an MSW with 2 years + experience with group facilitation and has been trainined in the curriculum being provided. How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Invoices will include the names of each participating probationer with the date of each group session attended. Backup vii.

j.

documentation includes sign-in sheets. The Individual Case Plan, progress notes for each session signed by the group facilitator, discharge plan, monthly progress reports and all communications with referring agents, and pre- and post tests are all documented and maintained in the client file .
k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Monthly written progress

reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent. A gent's are notified immediately of intake, termination and noncompliance.
Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: National

Council on Alcoholism took over as the program vendor after termination of the subcontract with the prior vendor. The process has been one of revitalizing the
Page 3 of 5

program and building relationships with the probation department. Referrals have not yet met projected numbers, but have been gradually increasing as agents become more familiar with the program and the faciliator. In addition to group sessions, services include pre- and post testing, individual case plan, and discharge plan; am P r' ^a- lip of the fol .,ng r^^ acrd t i tea Uou!d c01 - 1 i ,..ecn th ot^j l trait( ins id-ntT e d in Pert! o:o^ir en Dhcat^on i,sui tar ing and
^

eli te noted above and your response here. a. Will this program reduce prison commitments? YES i. If YES, clearly describe how: Cognitive Change programming is used as part

of a structured sentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate local programming to target straddle cell offenders and level 2 & 3 probation violators for local retention. The program is also used in lieu of or in reduction of jail sentences to open beds for offenders targeted for local retention. YES b. Will this program impact jail utilization:
i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this Felony participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or in program:

reduction of jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of the program. Misdemeanor participants are sentenced directly to the program in lieu of a minimum of 60 days of jail time or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 60 days pending successful completion of the program.
Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe how your estimate was calculated: Projected days saved: 2,880 65% successful completion of 50 participants = 33; 10% or 3 participant x 60 days saved = 180 days; 90% or 30 participants x 90 days saved = 2,700; 2,700+ 180=2,880 Is this program intended to impact recidivism? Y ES i. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: This program targets ii.

c.

felony probationer criminal thinking. Maintaining a low PCR and a reduction in jail utilization for this population will reflect status toward achieving a reduction in the recidivism rate. Participant, new offense convictions and probation violations will also be tracked for the duration of program.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: 5 Ph511 ^undcd i ogram eniol1Ees Jie from this prog am s 0C - ec nimens_ priine, erges population Tn :1^sc^^aira yes ca_-nden ng and focuses on populations in suoeort of your oojectrvejsj. rDP are r P0- hI _d upon ,,r cur ,)[cg[am ^hjcctI e per r To, c^. , utu -in e, i a,Ecti (sl. Tr -^:/ail _iP^^o^_i^ :r I. Ti Jai jail bed days _a _. ed if applicable to your i oel _.m de ign. li d. T r aci- successful srid unsuccessful terminations from the program Tr :c: the succc,aru uri_uccossTul a ^cbarge 'from- probs11on - program UreS
CGMIDIEtIOP5, DI

11

6.

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly

Page 4 of 5

3-1

0,

4,

=e1 = 1(

ln;l

di

acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary.

1. 80% of program participants will demonstrate an understanding of improved understanding of

cognitive intervention concepts to be measured by a pre- and post test.

Page 5of5

CCAB:

Ingham/Lansing

e
x
f

z;

,7

CFI-CA/1H
F"CCh[' C f
:

C. mr nity i orransInc 1a

National Council on Alcoholihm 2

Home ol 1^'t :,
Vi-'on

i;` PLr

L' .

12 eA a xn,

a' Piny

Cc -

+[

Glick here to r te Click here to enter text.

lick here tr Click here to enter text.

Click here to text. Click here to enter text.

Click hero to Iter -"- = Click here to enter text.

,a7ect^

i.

Click here to enter text. ickhcro to Click here to enter text.

here tc er text. Click here to enter text. Click

here

Click here to enter text. Click here to erne! t Click here to enter text.

hE text. Click here to enter text.

Ieh

CI^fLCI LCT^L.

Click here to enter text. Click hereto tex Click here to enter text.

V^I

do r.cted ADP

to

Click here to enter text.

Click here to er text Click here to enter text.

" :C3.'^a^'r ^EiY2tL:.B' _ K^'^S,Y.^vY::'.+"ir]t<93"frT...lT ..,.'7S9a"Sw7.c'4.'^Wyimx., s:2t'Z".L'i^:Jd.D

..-A a,..".. w..

.:'.:ttisS7.sx.x.a.5`X.'i..Rx5:5

LY.^G:..:.:_.rsta:{: :&.7...,fdlri:'.J.^ .S^

::-:: ;fy^:.:^'riSJ^+a^Cik.^,ut;,,.k,^h ...:^.:.:_w 4'ei.J."a

Are offenders assessed for type of residential placement (substance abuse treatment v. half-way house Page 1 of 2

prior to order/referral to the program? Explain: For substance abuse treatment programs, substance abuse assessments are conducted and must indicate the need for inpatient/residential treatment pursuant to A SA M criteria.

Are referrals to residential processed by the local manager/staff or do probation officers make direct referrals to the program? Explain: A ll referrals are made through and approved by the Community

Corrections Gatekeeper.
Is residential enrollment captured in Case Manager? Yes Describe any use of CPS funds in your plan to support non-core services at residential programs. Clearly describe at which RS vendor and type of non-core service: CPS and DO.IR funds are used for the

Holistic OUIL III Program Enhancements (HOPE) program at the CEI-CMH House of Commons How is non-core service enrollment captured in Case Manager? CCIS information is forwarded to Community Corrections for input into Case Manager
Do you count bed days saved for participation in residential programs? YES If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for residential participation.

However, jail sentences include a 90 day sentence reduction pending successful completion of the residential program.

Page 2 of 2

CCAB:

Ingham/Lansing
Day Reporting

Local Program Name:

Service Provider: being determined through RFP process this FY CCIS Service Type: D04 - Day Reporting Projected Enrollment: Sv Projected Length of Stay: 105 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to enter

tl

text.
Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: Residential: Community: Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: Click here to enter text. List projected enrollment by member county: Click here to enter text. SUPERVISION SERVICES Supervision programs include Day Reporting, Electronic Monitoring, Intensive Supervision and Pretrial Supervision. It may be proposed that Day Reporting be eliminated as a program type since service typically delivered under DR could be funded under Case Management or Intensive Supervision. PA511 funds can not be used to provide Electronic Monitoring Services for MDOC probationers unless it is for pretrial supervision of a probationer with a new charge (call your grant coordinator for exceptions). When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. Supervision programs are not intended to simply provide access to substance abuse testing absent other supervision activities. Costs associated with Substance Abuse Testing may be incurred as "supply" costs in this program's budget if testing is part of the program design. OCA recommends that an objective pretrial assessment be used before defendants are referred for pretrial supervision. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONSUSING A" IF'NOT APPLICABLETO THIIS*ARTICULAR PROGRAM.

The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.
Identify the objective(s) from your felony and/orjail analysis (Part I) that this program is designed to address:

Maintain PCRs in all target categories and control jail population and early releases due to overcrowding. 2 Based on your objective(s) 4 what Islyourtarget population? Sentenced felons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on straddle cell SGLs and level 2 and 3 probation violators.

Page 1 of 5

escrlb'e' 'he program

a. b. Is an assessment required to determine eligibility? NO Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable.

Sentenced felons: fresh sentences with 0-9 or greater SGL score and probation violators with 0-6 or greater SGL score in lieu of or in reduction of 90 days in jail. Not to include felony non-support convicted offenders. Felony Pretrial Defendants: Referred in lieu of incarceration. Sentenced Misdemeanants: Probation V iolator with 1 prior in lieu of or in reduction of 30 days in jail, prior violation may not be for non-support conviction. Enrollment in Cognitive Change Program is also required for felony and misdemeanant participants.
c. d. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? YES How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program?

Felony probationers: also by agent recommendation at Probation V iolation hearing Pretrial Defendants: referred by Circuit Court Pretrial Services Misdemeanants: Referred by assigned District Court probation officer
e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process?

Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifies eligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through CCIS reporting process.
f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.

Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Corrections will notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned in in the CCIS reporting process. If determined to be ineligible, the participant is terminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCA B Manager. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? CCIS data is gathered by program staff and forwarded to Community Corrections staff for quality control and COMPUS/CCA MIS entry
h. Office Visits: Are offenders supervised through (select all that apply): EMS: TX Reporting: TX System (e.g. OffenderLink): U Field Contacts:

Other (describe): Click here to enter text. I. If using electronic monitoring or other technology (including phone systems) answer and clearly explain the following (use NA if not applicable to your program). NOTE: The

MDOC charges $6.50 per day for radio frequency or Sobrietor units with monitoring, or,
$7.75 per day for both. i. What kind of equipment/system: NA ii. Vendor for equipment/service: NA Page 2 of 5

j.

Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/offender/day (clearly describe): Is there a separate cost associated (by program and/or vendor) with installation/set-up? NA . v. Who does the equipment installation/retrieval? NA vi. Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance? NA What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender?

iii. iv.

NA

Felons and Misdemeanants: Program report days will be coordinated with the *Cognitive Change Group sessions provided by National Council on Alcoholism. Phase l: 3 report days per week for 5 weeks on days that participant is not attending a Cognitive Change Group. Phase II: 2 report days per week for 4 weeks on days that participant is not attending a cognitive change group. Agents may reduce by one or add up to 2 days to reward compliance or to provide consequences for noncompliance with probation conditions. Phase Ill: 1 report day per week for 6 weeks on a day that participant is not attending a cognitive change group. Agents may add up to 2 days per week to provide consequences for noncompliance with probation conditions. Pretrial Defendants: Reporting frequency will be determined by Court Order or Pretrial Services Supervisor. k. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined?

For the felony and misdemeanants populations, reporting frequency is determined by the program design. In Phase ll, the supervising agent may increase by 2 days or decrease by one day the reporting frequency per week, In Phase the supervising A gent may add up to 2 days per week. Pretrial Defendants: Frequency determined by Court Order or Pretrial Services
Supervisor

What happens during a typical "report" and how long is it estimated to take? The program design requires participants to physically report at the appropriate frequency (see above) for a minimum of three hours per report session. . A needs assessment is conducted and an individualized plan for success is developed with the full involvement of the participant. Based on individual need, appropriate referrals are made and also communicated to the assigned probation agent or Pretrial Services supervisor for non-program services (e.g., GED, substance abuse treatment, and employment assistance, housing resources, etc.) Based on individual need, appropriate referrals are made and communicated to the participant and to their assigned probation agent or Pretrial Services contact for nonprogram services (e.g., GED, substance abuse treatment, and employment assistance, housing resources, etc.) During reports, progress relative to compliance. with probation requirements is discussed and progress on the particpant's plan for success is reviewed, updated and modified as Page 3 ofS

appropriate. Documentation verifying off-site activities is reviewed with the participant. On-site activites may include work on Cognitive Change Group and GED homework, filling out job applications, participating in supervised on-site activities and workshops, and mapping out personal action steps to achieve plan goals. Through the RFP and vendor selection process the scope of on-site activities will be finalized and incorporated into the program subcontract. m. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? YES Approved off-site activities are randomly verified and documented (e.g. employment, school, support groups, treatment etc.) n. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services? YES o. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity? YES, p. This program provides drug/alcohol testing. q. Explain involvement in 'p' above including the.frequency/cost of testing if provided: Click here to enter text. r. How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Invoices will include the name of each participant with each report date during the billing period. Backup documentation maintained by the provider will include sign-in sheets. Client files maintained by the provider will include documentation of intake, all report dates, length of stay and activities per report session signed by the attending supervisor, discharge plan, monthly progress reports and all communications with referring agents. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Monthly written progress reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent. Agent's are notified immediately of intake, termination and noncompliance. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: This program is intended to add another level of supervision and contact with a focus on providing guidance and support for successful re-entry into the community from jail and to help all participants succeed in the community. It provides an opportunity to identify problems and address them before formal probation violation is required, as well as an opportunity to encourage and reward compliance and progress. Reporting and on-site activities are structured so as not to interfere with employment, school attendance, other treatment activities, or compliance with other court ordered obligations. .. - ,-. t r - -- r, f. pro rcm neustrrsieet a.t feaet one,of th ,^,a,llo^ ^ir'g abrccex a, ai d thre sho' id Le CL c,
}fib" 3 w^ ^a tF. aYar,

s.

t.

'Na }. ^...ti

bet ,,''een the C61ea'EWes and sua_es es identified in Pert n e^i g 1Hr noted aUo e and your i aose rye erv

of g nus appl- icati_n yoar La gating ar

N

a.

Will this program reduce prison commitments?

Y ES

Page 4 .of

VI)

If YES, clearly describe how: Day Reporting is used as part of a structured sentence in conjunction with jail and/or other appropriate local programming to target straddle cell offenders and level 2 & 3 probation violators for local retention. The program is also used in lieu of or in reduction of jail sentences to open beds for offenders targeted for local retention. b. Will this program impact jail utilization: YES i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this program: Felony participants are sentenced to this program in lieu of or in reduction of jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of the program. Misdemeanor participants are sentenced directly to the program in lieu of a minimum of 60 days of jail time or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 60 days pending successful completion of the program. ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe how your estimate was calculated: Projected days saved: 2,856 65% successful completion of 56 participants = 36; 15% or 8 participants x 42 days saved (using JPIS ALOS presentenced status/sentenced after admission) = 336 days; 85.% or 28 participants x 90 days saved = 2,520; 2,520 + 336 = 2,856 c. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: This program targets felons with straddle cell SGLs and probation violators. Maintaining a low PCR and reductions in jail utilization for these target populations will reflect status toward achieving a reduction in the recidivism rate. Participant new offense convictions and probation violations will also be tracked for the duration of program. 5.. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: o=_>11 un L 0C r a ioi1 aierI ti1 1 R irom'hi I l_ H o iar^ at l Tiny t ^ctp. pulaticrr. n'n^ gnu ^ o_uses u1 oopulutioin n^t support o,our objecti ' c Tack the changes in PCP_, CDP LOS a,sed aeon ye_ir srcgram o ricctc , u pei Part IThs v vill r f leet stct^,^ il: ;ycui t ^c^i ;sl c Ida T i^ 1[ Ian. ', ,uC i t o^i= rl. T -ruand c^i lice- Tal er1roar )n, LIM ^. Tracr tnc_ucae d! iLrlisLioaz _Tul d ,1^ ioM F;rob3tori nor pr=AOM c ampietions/raiiures

i.

1.sall

6.

1.

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as securing of identification, completion of other monitored programs and conditions, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. 60% of program participants will meet objectives as defined in their individualized plan for
success.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB: Ingham/Lansing Local Program Name: Relapse Prevention and Recovery t c; Service Provider: C-E-1 Community Mental Health CCIS Service Type: G18 - Substance A buse (Outpatient) Projected Enrollment: 60 Projected Length of Stay: 196 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Click here to enter text. Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: Residential: Community: Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: Click here to enter text. List projected enrollment by member county: Click here to enter text. GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. Use of individual sessions should be ' described when asked for. New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations: Cognitive; Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. G00 is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICADLETO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM . The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down

option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.
Identify the objective(s) fron^zkyourielonyand/or jail analysis designed to address:
Maintain PCRs in all cate g ories

(Part I)'that this program is

and control jail population and early releases due to overcrowding.

Gaspedon your objective(s)) whatis yourtarget.population? Sentenced felons, fresh sentences and probation violations, with a priority on: straddle cell SGLs, level 2 and 3 probation violators, and QUIL 111 convictions 2

Page 1 of 5

? Describe the program: a. Based on what your program is intended to address (treatment effects) within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results.

A ftercare: Sentenced felons successful completing residential treatment (having been assessed as needing residential level treatment), SGL of 0-9 or greater or 0-6 or greater on a probation violation, in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 90 days in jail Outpatient: Sentenced felon (fresh sentence or probation violation) with an SGL of 0-9 or greater of 0-6 on a probation violation in lieu of or in reduction of a minimum of 60 days in jail, assessed as needing outpatient level treatment, relapse following residential or community-based outpatient treatment program.
Priority

populations: straddle cell SGLs, probation violators, OUIL ill conviction,

b.

Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? Y ES

Referred probationers must be assessed as needing outpatient level treatment pursuant to A SA M criteria ii. Who completes the assessment? Third party assessment provider
Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? Y ES iv. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level of treatment per the assessment? Y ES, agents Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? Sometimes, however there are cases when the Court orders an iii.

c.

assessment and compliance with assessment recommendations as part of the sentence ( fresh cases and PV s) Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? Y ES
d. e. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? NA Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process.

Probation agents make referrals based on eligibility criteria, program staff verifies eligibility prior to enrollment, Community Corrections confirms eligibility through COGS reporting process.
f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.
Pro gram staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Corrections will notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned in

in the CCMS reporting process. If determined ineligible, the participant will be terminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCA B Manager. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Monthly COOS reports are submitted by program staff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff
Page 2 of 5

h.

Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations).

Truthought - Charting a New Course Thinking Curriculum & Haze/don Relapse Prevention Skills program ii. Number of sessions per week per cohort (group): 1 intake interview, 2 group sessions per week for 10 weeks stepping down to 1 group session per week for 1b weeks, followed by an exit interview
iii. iv. v. How many cohorts? 38 Length of sessions: 1.5 hours Understanding that some participants may take longer to master skills than others, how many sessions, on average, are anticipated for program completion? 38 Identify what skills are taught in this program: RP&R blends the Truthought:

vi.

Charting a New Course curriculum with the Hazeldon Relapse Prevention Skills program. Truthought teaches participants to identify and evaluate thinking barriers and replace them with responsible thinking correctives. The Haze/don curriculum teaches participants how to keep recovery strong by identifying triggers, cravings, and situations that put them at risk for relapse; develop a plan to prevent using and reoffendingl; and build a trustworthy support network to help them stay sober and crime free.
vii. Identify if/how offenders transition between various phases or treatment RP&R locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program:

follows residential treatment as an aftercare component and is also available to sentenced felony probationers (fresh sentence or probation violation) who have relapsed following outpatient level treatment received in the jail or in the community
viii. Are individual sessions part of the program? NO ix. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? NA x. On what basis would individual sessions be used? NA Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: The RP&R group facilitator has a BS in Criminal Justice from MSU, has group facilitator experience with very difficult populations. Has received CMH Substance Abuse Program required training including addiction theory and relapse prevention and was trained in the Truthought curriculum. How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Invoices will include the names of each

j.

participating probationer and the number of Phase I or II group sessions 'attended.

k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Monthly written progress

reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent. A gent's are notified of intake and noncompliance immediately.

Page 3 of 5

Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically As an identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program:

aftercare component, this program adds to the continuum of care and available support for those who have completed residential and are transitioning back into the community. Because RP&R technically falls between OP and /OP and offers a different curriculum than other local programs, it is an excellent alternative to repeating OP for those experiencing relapse after residential or other outpatient programs. RP&R also requires and monitors weekly participation in A A or SMA RT Recovery support groups.
JL M
T,

1:A I

n^

re . ,

f li!o

Il!

LIi

and

1 in rein gets. __n d i c lID u;lb L. ,t'Y ii YES a. Will this program reduce prison commitments? i. If YES, clearly describe how: RP&R is used in conjunction with residential
1d

e should b is- soon-teen, snood 1_ a n> 1 ativir, your t Il

treatment as an alternative to prison for felony offenders with a straddle cell SGL and for level 3 probation violators, both of which are target populations.
b. YES Will this program impact jail utilization: clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this i. If YES, Participants are sentenced to RP&R in lieu of or in reduction offal/ program:

time that includes residential in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of the program. Participants sentenced directly to RP&R are sentenced to the program in lieu of a minimum of 30 days of fail time or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 30 days pending successful completion of the program.
Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe how your estimate was calculated: Projected days saved: 4,350 75% successful completion of 60 participants = 50; 10% or 5 participants x 60 days saved = 300 days; 90% or 45 participants x 90 days saved = 4,050; 4,050 + 300 = 4,350 Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: RP&R specifically targets ii.

c.

felony probationer relapse and criminal thinking. A reduction in the probation violation commitment rate for new offenses will reflect status toward achieving a reduction in the recidivism rate. New offenses and probation violations will also be tracked for the duration of the program.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: , ii: from this pi colain: A51L fen -1 i p Q r,9nl ne 01 Li ^( Iecielnr_'ioOLlla^ U c oil pis pulitlcns in llne end Trio H ne,obII T bepLilatlon e Illll`, % ehJcLii siinourt Traci t i le changes in PCB_, 4DP arldjor LOS based uuon your program oa;ect! _s. per Part I. ThisI,it rut':ct_tntustoe.drd nchie,iemcn of ,;ourobjeo*-r.'els). Task d Tr I ,u l bee do s
_n ud - if

Ila

applicable to your
si

plc:

am

esign

ssful and unsuccessful temat ens frn ,i she pn ga ll en; IICiii i rOu`n:: for l,r uccessful/unsuccessful do-

r_: r

Page 4of5

Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. 1. 70% of program participants will be involved in a meaningful activity such as employment, school, and/or volunteer work by the time they are successfully discharged. 2. 80% of program participants will self report an increase in overall satisfaction with their quality of life as measured by a pre- and post Life Status Questionnaire. 3. Known relapse events will be tracked from the time of program enrollment and the length of time between relapse events for the duration of the program and correclated with SGL scores.

Page 5 of 5

CCAB:Ingham/Lansing Local Program Name: Holistic OUIL Ul Program Enhancements (HOPE) Service Provider: CEI-Community Mental Health - House of Commons CCIS Service Type: ZOO - Other Projected Enrollment: 23 Projected Length of Stay: 70 Does this program also use DDJR funding? YES If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? 18 Program Location (select all that apply): Residential: Community: Jail: Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation Click here to enter text. If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: Click here to enter text. "Other" programming/services not already identified by a CCIS Service Type/Code Before requesting funding for an "Other" coded program, discuss with your grant coordinator to ensure the design can not be funded under an existing code. Be prepared to thoroughly justify the need for the program/service and how it clearly relates to a stated objective. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING " NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS` PARTICULAR PROGRAM. The form permits text, uses drop-down options, and permits additional text when a drop-down option with further instructions is selected. Some text entries where longer responses are anticipated permit carriage returns [press Enter] to create separate paragraphs.

Maintain OUIL .111 PCR at 8% to 12% and reduce the ALOS in jail by an average of 30 days. Felony OUIL ill convicted offenders - fresh sentenceswith intermediate and straddle cell SGLs and level2 and 3 probation violations

a. Is an assessment required to determine eligibility?

YES Substance Abuse (S/A) Assessment with ASAM criteria indicating need for residential level S/A treatment

b. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable.
Sentenced OUIL 111 felons with intermediate and straddle cell SGL scores who meet all eligibility for House of Commons residential substance abuse treatment services (DDJR funding: must be intermediate cell or straddle cell with PVR less than 35)

Page 1 of 4

House of Commons eligibility criteria.: A ssessed as needing residential level S/A treatment pursuant to A SA M criteria 0-9 or greater SGL score on fresh sentence 0-6 or greater SGL score on a probation violation
c. d. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? NO How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? All OUIL 11!

convicted residents of the House of Commons are automatically offered program enrollment
e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process? The

House of Commons program Director identifies eligible OUIL I!l program participants, Community Corrections monitors eligibility through CCIS and ensures that program services are charged appropriately between DDJR and CPS.
f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility.

g.

Program staff communicates ineligibility to referring agent. Community Corrections will notify program staff and referring agent in cases where eligibility is questioned in in the CCIS reporting process. If determined ineligible, the participant will be terminated, unless continued participation is authorized by the CCA B Manager. THOROUGHLY describe this program/service: Holistic OUIL Ill Pprogram Enhancement (HOPE). services address the physiological deficiencies of the recovering alcohol addicted resident and work in conjuction with the cognitive based S/A treatment provided at the House of Commons. HOPE services are designed to improve the general health and well-being of participants for the purpose of improving the overall treatment. result. A ccupunture and nutritional therapy reduce cravings, alleviate mood swings, balance body chemist)/ and help to repair the physiological damage done by the. alcoholism. By reducing the stressors associated with poor health and the struggle to remain abstinent, residents are able to engage in and maintain amenability to treatment and achieve a better result. HOPE program services: 2 -1 hour full body accupuncture sessions per week to reduce stress, cravings, and Improve general health and sense of well-being 4 - Nutritional Therapy Group Sessions teach and provide particpants with nutritional information and specific tools that help curb and eliminate cravings, stab!ize blood sugar levels, balance body chemistry and repair damage resulting from alcohol addiction and to assist with the transition experienced by abstaining from alcohol. A n A ssessment is conducted and an A ction Plan is developed for each participant that includes outcomes to be achieved, action steps and strategies for achieving and maintaining change. Group sessions include instruction on making appropriate food choices and behavior modification techniques including role playing, guided imagery, and other exercises using state management, conditioning and anchoring tools. Daily meals provided meet nutritional guidelines developed for recovering alcoholics. By not adequately addressing the physiology of the alcohol addicted offender,
Page 2 of 4

treatment dollars are used to their maximum potential. Studies show that well nourished recovering alcoholics remain sober longer because brin chemicals stay more balanced, there are fewer emotional/mood ups and downs which act as triggers causing increased withdrawal symptoms and relapses. 90% of alcoholics show marked hypoglycemic challenges. W hen hypoglycemia is controlled through proper nutrition, desire/cravings disappear. A dditionally, the right foods can repair years of damage caused by alcohol abuse.
h.

The felony OUIL ill population is targeted for structured sentences that reduce jail time followed by residential treatment. W ith OUIL Ill offenders being diverted to the 54-A and 55th District Court Sobriety Courts, offenders who are sentenced in Circuit Court or sentenced on probation violations in Circuit Court or in District Court due to failure in Sobriety Court are the more serious and chronic of this population. A continuum of care that expedites the onset of structured, effective, long term community-based treatment for this population is critical to reducing recidivism and maintaining public safety.
Why is this program/service critical to your plan?

i. j.

The House of Commons program in conjunction with HOPE provides the Court with a continuum of treatment that can starts in the jail with the CMH-CA TS program followed by HOC Rresidential - HOPE followed by Relapse Prevention & Recovery A ftercare. Monthly CC1S reports are submitted by program How is CCIS data gathered/entered? staff and entered into Case Management program by Community Corrections staff.
How are delivered services (for billing purposes) and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? invoices submitted include documentation (sign-in sheets for all sessions and invoices signed by the accupunturist and nutritional

therapist) providing the resident names, dates of service, and type of service.
k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Monthly written progress reports are provided to the participant's assigned agent. Agent's are notified immediately of intake, termination and noncompliance.
Y?^! f - ` .il::: . T y .,, . fli d !^'J:^Y^.,::'1 .I n'Ei 1'~r Maji: { H ^. 1./' '.. ..^...y.9,tur^.'y+J^LY .. xyy.:iY^^ .. ' ^.r 1'..w: J a 7!; ''^ YTr IT, ifsgf x, :ad: }; x jt(R%'rl: 1'^ i i f I ^,^`1 U{' tif^f N4Y^i^ {'C* 4i NA, t[1L!^ ^^/{(I i ^^l^ Y..^. ^.: k, h . 1'-n FMi\ :^i^:, /p . ..`^.,.Gy ...;..-.^ a .> ^ , . r^. x. -z-.:.... .ry^ : ^ . -^{,,..{ :, : ...?L...liw '.v-, H r ^Y't.',.^..,i .{IY?'V :jt.. tIK uY.yj l:S _5 ...+ > ,::;:s, r ! i t.:r,t1 , F".:.... gy p ..1.
3{'w 41.

j.

[Et
S

"r

:^ i

t^',"

"^

wr

art;

w^

>~ ]^

I . J-'..j 1.{ ,I ^ ryk . .^ ^,S e ll.. w-k: f!`' YE.'".'K::te ]^.il. Y$:sl` Iii -At,: 1 r _-_:1...3a".Tr c ' ^ +:5(!...:{' .a:s^el 'Y ,'.^,fn+. ^ :'^r^2' ^ I sa(IPpf1 uJ Ix ^0 ^m U ^ i1 3 ^t^I^ O f 1tl t7 7 j{^ x YES a. Will this program reduce prison commitments? I. If YES, clearly describe how: HOPE is used in conjunction with residential treatment following jail as an alternative to prison for felony offenders with a straddle cell SGL and for level 3 probation violators, both of which are target populations.

s^ *pL vd0 ; jf ^Fnd^ F -S .R.^ .Y 5. ->J ^ c }...'v t:. .8 S Yy e 3.1 ' . ( T1'.'E "j^ r^r t .-GM ^ .fk.-..",\.rr r.u 4 ':7J y, k C^ .^ p` ^i:rA s 'SC tc :aL '149 yt Y >^ Ye m ^7 .f ;x ^,;p: ^Y3. :3 2`^ :d^! ;. } 'T ^ 1 .E1A.^..'F..^. , 3{.wPv, fz . r .ii-Sr :^'y S'i.^ . x.,. ,4_ t..r.,. ...l:x1za:,:a^: ''-F=,^^^."^,11:..u ` . ,'u:w . . v.d3'.-;

ai+r

b.

Will this program impact jail utilization:

Y ES

Page 3 of 4

c.

i. If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for this Participants are sentenced to HOC - HOPE in lieu of or in reduction program: of jail time in lieu of a minimum of 90 days in jail or jail sentences are reduced by a minimum of 90 days pending successful completion of the program. ii. Estimate how many jail bed days will be saved due to this program and describe how your estimate was calculated: Projected Days Save: 1,530 75% successful completion of 23 participants = 17; 17 x 90 days saved = 1,530 Is this program intended to impact recidivism? Y ES Program termination due i. If YES, describe how and how it will be measured: to new offenses and/or probation violations will be tracked for the duration of the program and also throughout the duration of the Relapse Prevention and Recovery Aftercare program.

6. Develop additional performance indicators based on the specifics of your program design. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. 1.

80% of HOPE participants will report improved quality of fife including sleep, mental clarity, concentration and stress level after completing treatment to measured using Likert Scale scores on pre- and post Life Satisfaction surveys 2. 70% of HOPE participants will demonstrate improvement in general health categories including weight, blood pressure, gastrointestinal distress to be measured based on preand post general health assessments conducted by the HOC program nurse.

Page 4of4

realer IA1min/1a
.O e 12095 - Lansing, MI 48901
3a-3>

w,L asin iElistr

Dear Friend: The Historical Society of Greater Lansing is pleased to announce that it is beginning establish a local historical museum devoted to telling the stories of the people and businesses located in Greater Lansing. In conjunction with this goal, we would like to invite you to take part in our first museum fundraiser, a silent auction, this fall. All money raised from this event will be used for the future development of a Lansing history museum. The event will take place on Saturday, October 8, 2011 from 4:00pm-7:OOpm at Comerica Bank in downtown Lansing, located at 101 N. Washington Square. In 1947, the Historical Society of Greater Lansing was formed to promote Lansing's history through educational programming and to collect historical items that would someday be exhibited in a local history museum. As the years passed, our vision for establishing a local history museum faded. In late 2010, the historical society decided to reclaim this original goal and has begun work to establish a historical museum devoted to the Greater Lansing area. Our museum fundraiser will only be successful with the help of the Greater Lansing community. Enclosed in this letter you will find a donation form. In order to make this event a success, we will raise funds two different ways: both through event sponsorships and through the donation of items to be auctioned. We would like to ask you to consider making a donation of whichever sort you fmd most appropriate for your business. For more information or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by calling 517-282r-a 0671 or e-mailing me at vrmaryinqslicOobal.net . Thank you in advance for your support,

VALERIE MARVIN President Historical Society of Greater Lansing

Greater Lansing
P.O. I g ix 12095 - Lansing, MI 48901 wwwoLansingHistoryoorg The Historical Society of Greater Lansing is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit corporation.

Silent Auction Event Sponsorships & Auction Donations

HSGL Silent Auction - Saturday, October 8, 2011 - 4:OOpm-7:OOpm Comerica Bank, 101 North Washington Square, Downtown Lansing $5,000 - Platinum Sponsor

Top billing on all promotional materials, full-page advertisement in auction booklet (back cover or inside covers), 8 tickets to event
$1,000 - Gold Sponsor

Full-page advertisement in auction booklet, 6 tickets to event

$500 - Silver Sponsor

Half-page advertisement in auction booklet, 4 tickets to event

$250 - Bronze Sponsor

Third-page advertisement in auction booklet, 2 tickets to event

$100 - Copper Sponsor

Name included in list of sponsors in auction booklet, 2 tickets to event

(See reverse for advertising information)

Auction Item Donation

I can help the Historical Society by donating the following auction item(s):

Item Value $ I will mail my items Please pick up my donation; it will be available for pick-up by Donor Information Name Address City Phone State E-mail Zip

I understand that my donation may be used by HSGL in any way necessary to benefit HSGL Programs. Signature Date Make checks payable to the Historical Society of Greater Lansing.

Advertising Information Below are representation of the sizes of advertisements for various levels of sponsorship. Advertisements must fit inside these dimensions to fit appropriately in the event program. Your black and white camera ready artwork should be in PDF or JPG format at 300dpi resolution, if possible. Please email artwork by September 16, 2011 to davemarvin@sbcglobal.net . If you have any questions or would like us to help prepare an advertisement, please feel free to call David Marvin at (517) 282-1156. Full Page Ad Finished Size 5" x 8" Vertical

Third Page Ad Finished Size 5" x 2.75" Vertical

Half Page Ad Finished Size 5" x 4" Vertical

July 18, 2011

Dear Lansing City Council Community Funding Committee:

I am writing on behalf of

Lansing Neighborhood Council to express support for Wexford Montessori Magnet School PTA. for activities and games for the August 27, 2011 Community Celebration at New Mount Calvary Baptist Church.

Wexford PTA became before the committee on June 20 `'', to seek the donations to assist in this yearly function that is supported by community organizations on the Southside of Lansing. Wexford was told to seek co-applicant for this event, and we have graciously agreed to join in with them for this great occasion. If anything else is needed from us in reference to them being able to secure the $500,00 funding for this event, please feel free to contact me at (517) 393-3998, or Janet Robinson (Wexford PTA) at 517 7121077. look forward to participating in another event that supports and bring together a well deserving neighborhood, school and community organization.
We

Sincerely,

Cheryl A. Risner
Will Career Academy 5015 Wise Fload, Room F200 Lansing, Michigan 40911
Phono.(517) 3993-9063 Fax (517) 393-9085

lansingneighborhoods.com !&..-4- -- 7//

'/t
'd

n .1717 'N

Wd88

IIR

8l 'l n r'

July 6, 2011

Chris Swope Office of the City Clerk Lansing, MI Re: Response to notice of snow violation - 650 Louisa Dear Mr. Swope: Today _l received two notices regarding snow removal at a registered rental property I own at 650 Louisa St. I protest the city's claim that I -am responsible for charges related to snow removal -at that property. The ordinance states that the city shall post a notice of snow violation at the property and -mailnotice to the property owner before the city clears the snow. I did not receive notice by mail which presumably should have been mailed to me the day of the violation or very shortly thereafter. The tenant who was there throughout the winter never indicated that any notice was left at the property. I contend that the city did not comply with the requirements of the ordinance-which left me no, way to know of a violation-or. the city 's_intent_tnelem. snow._ I received two notices of a public hearing. Does-the city-claim-two-different-instances of snow removal? Neither notice states a date of violation or date of snow removal. This, along with the city's failure-to provide the 24-hour notice by mail, calls into question whether there was any violation or snow removal.

I claim that there was no snow violation. At the least, the city did not follow the requirements of the ordinance by mailing me a 24-hour notice. This is my protest of any charge or special assessment related to a snow violation or snow clearing at 650 Louisa. Please respond in writing to confirm that there will be no charge or assessment. Sincerely,

CKyle Vandecar 630 Hillcrest Ave. East Lansing MI 48823

CD

0 if