Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FEATURES
Crime
In addition, the woman who had seen Cazorla on the street and identified him to police, had, years earlier, also pointed police to another man who was subsequently acquitted thanks to DNA tests. In Cazorlas case, however, the judges paid little attention to the forensic information, basing their verdict instead on the victims testimonies, which were described as being consistent, solid and forceful. In effect, they ignored the possibility that the victims might have made a mistake. Cazorla is not alone in being a victim of bad memory. According to the US NGO Innocence Project, more than 80 percent of people wrongly convicted were put behind bars because of mistaken identifications by victims and witnesses. No similar statistics are kept in Spain. Part of the problem is that correctly conducting an identification process is not easy. An interesting experiment was carried out for a recent television documentary El quinto por la izquierda by La Marea Productions. A group of 300 participants were shown a video of a purse snatch-
Studies show that people forget a criminals face with the passage of time False identification accounts for 80 percent of flawed convictions
ing and the face of the thief was displayed on the screen giving viewers more time to get an impression than would normally be the case during a real crime. They were subsequently asked to identify the bag snatcher in a lineup. The conditions were considered optimal. The participants were not stressed and they knew that what they were doing was putting their memories to the test and not trying to identify a criminal. Even so, only 52 percent of participants answered correctly by pointing out that the thief was not among the people lined up in front of them five minutes after they had watched the video. Two days later, the proportion of people who got it right dropped to 25 percent. The results suggest that in a real-life line up between 48 percent and 75 percent of the witnesses would have identified innocent people. In a separate test, the purse snatcher from the video was placed among the people in the lineup. But even then, he was only correctly identified by 32 percent of the witnesses five minutes after seeing the video, and
by only 13 percent two days after the viewing. Few people would knowingly lie in such a situation and possibly send an innocent person to jail. So why then do they trust their memories when they point to an innocent person in a lineup and identify them without any doubt as the law requires? Mind distortion is to blame, and it means that an innocent persons face can easily become that of the criminal in the victims mind. We know that the precision of an identification depends on various factors difficulties seeing the face, high stress levels, the passage of time, inadequate police lineups but on the other hand we dont know so much about the reasons that cause victims and witnesses levels of certainty to vary, explains Margarita Diges, a professor of psychology at Madrids Autonomous University and an expert in so-called testimony psychology. Other than internal, individual reasons, one way to increase the certainty of a witness is to lead them to believe that they are right, such as showing them a photo and then calling that that person to participate in a lineup, Diges said. It has been empirically proven that there is no relationship between a victims level of certainty and the precision of the identification. However, despite all the evidence and tests, what we see in reality with the police and judicial system is that, when the victim is absolutely certain they have identified their assailant, that certainty is taken as a guarantee of precision even when exculpatory scientific evidence exists, such as DNA samples, she said. The key moment occurs when a witness or the victim thinks that the person they are shown in a photo is the criminal. If that first identification is repeated then the victim or witness will consistently continue to identify that person with increasing levels of uncertainty. Irregularities on the part of police handling the identification process can therefore have dramatic consequences. A photo shown repeatedly, a suspect spotted in the police station before the lineup, or a lineup in which only one person looks remotely similar to the criminal can lead to innocent people being convicted and the guilty remaining free. Besides Cazorlas case, several such episodes have come to light in Spain in recent years. In the summer of 2009, the Supreme Court acquitted Henry Osagiede, a Nigerian man convicted on two counts of sexual assault and armed robbery. He had been the only black man in the police lineup and the two victims of the attacks had previously identified without any doubt another man who was able to prove his innocence.
VICTIM OF MISIDENTIFICATION. Ricardo Cazorla spent nearly three years in prison for rapes he didnt commit. The Supreme Court overturned his convictions based on DNA evidence that a court in the Canary Islands had refused to take into account. / rafa avero
Rafael Ricardi was sentenced for rape and spent 13 years in prison. He was innocent. His misfortune was that he had been a drug addict, living a rough life on the streets. Ricardi was an almost stereotypical typical victim of a botched police identification process: persons who because of their economic and social status have few people to help them, no money for good lawyers, and a lifestyle that often leaves them unable to account for their whereabouts. Some cases are simply mindboggling. Jorge Ortiz was convicted of armed robbery even though one of the two victims did not identify him and another
Crime
FEATURES
withdrew her original testimony just before the trial when she was shown a photo of the man who was the real criminal. The judge did not care. He based his ruling on one victims original testimony and, to add insult to injury for Ortiz, the sentence was upheld on appeal by the Supreme Court with the Constitutional Court refusing to even hear his case. In the end, he was released thanks to the efforts of the victim, who had campaigned on his behalf. He had spent two and a half years in prison. Not only do victims, witnesses, the police, prosecutors and judges make mistakes, but when they do, the justice system has a hard time acknowledging them and correcting them. In theory,
Police at a crime scene reconstruction escort murder suspect Enmanuel Martnez who, along with his girlfriend, is charged with leaving a man to die inside the trunk of an automobile in Valencia. / carles francesc
Julio Ros say ex-inmates have tough time adjusting. / carlos rosillo
Mind distortions allow victims to think an innocent person is a criminal No politician wants to champion the rights of a wrongly accused rapist
once a sentence has been handed down it is unchangeable no matter if it goes against the most basic principles of common sense. That is what happened to Ahmed Tommouhi and Abderrazak Mounib, two Moroccan immigrants convicted for a series of rapes in Tarragona and Barce-
lona in 1991. Four years later, the real rapist, a Spaniard, was identified, but Tommouhis and Mounibs innocence could only be proven in one rape where DNA evidence was available. But they had to continue serving their sentences for the other crimes. Mounib died in prison in 2000. Tommouhi spent a total of 15 years behind bars before he was released in 2006. The Supreme Court did not revoke the sentences he had received because the rules for appeals are very strictly defined: the convict must prove their innocence, and in this case there was no DNA to test. The government took nine years to decide whether or not to pardon him. It ultimately refused few politicians want to be seen releasing rapists (even innocent ones) from prison. And that points to another problem. False convictions usually occur in cases where the crimes are so severe that public pressure on the police and the courts to make someone pay is high. Braulio Garca Jan, a journalist, recently published a book on Tommouhi and Mounibs case called Justicia potica (Poetic justice), based on four years of research that he has recounted in detail on his blog ladoblehelice. com. What has come to light through his work is not just a
course. It cant be used for everything. Spain needs to find effective alternatives to prison. Theres no space for more prisoners in our prisons. Ros recalls how, soon after starting to practice as a lawyer, a friend introduced him to a young man who had just been released. He had drug problems and nowhere to sleep. He ended up in my house, the professor says. The young man was one in a long line of ex-prisoners who have passed through Ros home on their way from prison to life in society. He has moved out of
the city so he and his guests can have more space and tranquility. Prison is hard, he says. Society doesnt realize what its like to be a prisoner its total devastation. Among Ros guests were once two prisoners who had spent more than 20 years behind bars. In the end both committed suicide. One of them stole my stereo system. He went before a judge, confessed to what he had done and said he wanted to go back to prison; he didnt know how to live outside. He took his own life a few days later, Ros recounts.
handful of victims with flawed memories, but a string of errors in the police and judicial investigations. One of the girls who made a mistake in the identification, as DNA tests later proved, saw both the innocent men before the lineup, Garca Jan notes. And she saw them as suspects: Tommouhi was handcuffed and being guided to a cell. She and a dozen other victims were sitting in the hallway of the courtroom when the defendant was escorted by her. Curiously, she didnt identify Mounib the first time when the Civil Guard showed her his photo. But days after the victim of another rape identified him, she also came forward and accused him. Years later, the victim admitted that she didnt even look at the other people in the lineups. And though she said she had no doubt, she got it wrong. It is a common problem, but
judges, Garca Jan says, argue that official irregularities do not have any effect on how precise the identification is. It seems surprising that with so many cases of innocent people being wrongly convicted, judges seem intent on ignoring the findings of psychology studies on testimony. In the current judicial culture, particularly with regard to crimes of a sexual nature, there are three clichs: that the judge has a special ability to see the truth; that testimony is solid evidence; and that the victim should be afforded added credibility, so therefore what they say should suffice, notes Perfecto Andrs Ibez, a Supreme Court justice. They are clichs that are clearly undermined by testimony psychology and none of them are true. But that doesnt matter because they form part of the dominant public opinion
and make judicial work easier. On the other hand, courts often have to work on the basis of material photographic identifications, for example obtained on questionable grounds. There is no viable alternative to exercising justice with respect to the presumption of innocence and procedural guarantees. The fear of acquitting must be lost, even knowing that it will be unpopular, Ibez said. And to me it seems necessary for the change in judicial culture to be accompanied by another no less profound change in the culture and practices of the media, the top court justice said. Recent scientific studies show that false memories are generated in a different part of the brain than real ones. If that could be easily tested, it might save dozens or hundreds of innocent people from ending up behind bars.